Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CONTEXT
As Gabriel and Lang (1995) observe, modernity conspires
against fixed identities, making the construction of self-identity an
interminable, reflexive and symbolic project. Our identities are not
simply the productof our personal relationships, lifestyle decisions
and consumer choices; they are constituted by the ways in which we
write these into our own "coherent, yet continually revised, biographical narratives" (Giddens 1991:5). The construction of such
narratives becomes particularly problematic in postmodern society, which highlights the fluid and fragmented nature of identity
(Bauman 1996; Elliott and Wattansuwan 1998; Firat and Dholakia
1998). Similar challenges and problems exist on social as well as
personal levels:
A group's identity, like personal identity, is problematic; it
must be fought over andforged out ofshared experiences and
traditions; it must discard attributions imposed upon the
group by others; it must discover and celebrate its own
continuity with the past; it must choose who its friends and
enemies are, where its boundaries lie, what its symbols are
and so on (Gabriel and Lang 1995:85)
Such concerns resonate with those addressed in the literature
on national identity. The nation-state-a fusion of the political (the
state), the social (society) and the cultural (the nation)-is largely a
creation of modernity and the Enlightenment (Hague 1996). As
McCrone (1992:9) observes.
Modernity had aligned the national economy, polity and
culture so that citizenship and an allegiance to the sovereign
684
FINDINGS
The youngadults provided rich and detailed accountsof a wide
range of ads and their meanings. Throughout the discussions and
sortingexercises, it became evident that informants categorized ads
in many different ways, and it was in this context that the perceived
origins of ads emerged as a theme. The main distinctions made were
between "Scottish" and "English" ads, and between "British" ads
and those from Europe, America, and elsewhere. The cues guiding
their categorizations, and the meanings associated with the different categories, are discussed below.
Scottish ads
"Scottish" ads were discussed as a distinct category, although
as Papadopoulos (1993) would predict, attributing a place of origin
to ads was not always straightforward. Informants generally considered an ad for a Scottish product to be a Scottish ad, although
several people suggested that an ad for Irn-Bru, a soft drink brand
which has seeped into the fabric of Scottish culture, "had probably
been made in England". Indeed, Irn-Bru's advertising at the time
was created by the London-based agency Lowe-Howard-Spink.
The murky issue of origin is also highlighted by some discussions
about an ad for Persil detergent, which informants knew was the
product of a multinational company. Despite the product's origins,
this ad was described as a "genuine Scottish advert" because it
featured a popular Scottish actor and portrayed the characters and
rural setting in an amusing but authentic light.
When informants talked about Scottish advertising, they often
associated it with low-budget ads, many of which were "local" or
"regional". The terms "local" and "regional" were often used
interchangeably, but some informants referred to national ads
which had been dubbed into local or regional accents as "regional".
One informant suggested that
// 's quite nice to see local, you know, regional adverts on telly
like that. Cos you know a lot of Persil ones are all sort of
London-based... [male graduate workers 21-24]
Whatever their merits in this respect, however, these ads were
universally condemned as "cheap", "tacky", "horrible" and "nasty".
Local television commercials were described as "blip adverts",
sometimes lasting only five seconds, using "elevator music" and
"wonky pictures", and often broadcast at three in the morning.
Local cinema ads (particularly those for restaurants) were similarly
ridiculed; these were typically described as extremely low-budget,
with "bad,crackling prints" used for yearsonend,andhaving"little
or no thought put into them". Only slightly higher up the evolutionary ladder was a long-standing television campaign for a furniture
warehouse which featured a Scottish sports presenter. Informants
dissected these ads with distaste, unimpressed by the choice of
celebrity or the production techniques involved:
/ think he must have been cheap to get.,.they thought "Och,
he's cheap, he's Scottish, everyone will love him" [unemployed female 21-24]
you can relate to". Informants also spoke favorably about ads which
featured familiar parts of Scotland:
It's good to see an advert showing your own country as well.
The Tennent's one. A s soon as he walked down Princes Street,
the statue, the castle behind it, and Bianco's at the west endI ken [know] where he is! [male workers 18-20]
Scottish vs Englisli ads
When informants discussed Scottish ads, thoughts of their
English neighbors were rarely far away. Various comments indicated a degree of self-consciousness, and a concem with how
Scottish ads would be perceived in England. Forexample, a young
male student said that he "would hate English people to see Scottish
ads-it might give them the wrong impression". On the other hand,
an ad for a Scottish utilities company was admired partly because
It pushes Scotland, you know what I mean? I think they're
maybe shown in Britain so English people will be able to
picture it more... [male workers 18-20]
I'm proud to be a Scot...if I see that Loch Ness one, ifI see an
English person or someone from somewhere else looking at
that, they might think it's pretty... [unemployed males 18-20]
Consistent with Hague's (1996) notion of Scotland as
"England's friend a(/enemy",varlouscomments indicated a sense
of rivalry. For example, a male student noted that an ad featuring a
famous footballer "didn't go down too well in Scotland cos he's
English". When Scottish ads were discussed in relation to English
ones, Scotland was often thought to suffer by comparison:
You see an English advert and then you see a Scottish one and
you think the advert's so bad compared to the English one. And
you feel like Scotland's second best cos they make crap adverts
[male students 18-20]
Although they thought that Scottish ads were generally inferior to English ones, informants often accounted for this on financial grounds. Thus, two female graduate workers discussed a
Scottish ad which had not impressed them. One suggested that the
advertisers"...couldn't afford anybody nice",and the otherchipped
in with "couldn't afford an English person!". Similarly,
You would maybe look at it and say well, you can tell it's
Scottish because not as much money has been spent on it as the
English would spend on it. [unemployed males 21-24]
In anothergroup, it was recognized that some English ads were
also low-budget, but this was seen to be relative, as "there's more
affluence down there". Running through many comments was a
general sense of Scotland and Scottishness being excluded or
marginalized. This was expressed at a very general level by one
informant, who suggested that television in general had been
"Englishified":
... there's talk of Britain, it's never Scotland and England, it's
England and Britain. That's what I hate. Even Northern
Ireland and Scotland's all Britain, and England's a place on
its own [unemployed females 18-20]
Several informants complained that English magazines or
television programs contained ads for products which were not
DISCUSSION
Clearly, the findings presented above relate to a particular
group, situated in a particular time and place. Nonetheless, they
raise some interesting issues for discussion and future research.
Firstly, these findings offer some support for the broader perspective on country-of-origin advocated by Askegaard and Ger (1997).
The young adults clearly considered ads to have a place of origin,
and they were involved in creating images and meanings around
those places of origin. This suggests that advertisers should pay
careful attention to the range of cues which consumers may use to
make inferences about an ad's origins. Given that ads may be seen
as an aspect of a brand's personality (Biel 1990), the perceived
origins of an ad may play a role in influence perceptions about the
brand. This may be of particular interest to advertisers seeking to
overcome negative perceptions associated with a brand's origins,
such as those discussed in the animosity model of foreign product
purchase (Klein et al 1998).
The ease with which informants made sense of a whole range
of cues within the ads, and the critical manner in which they
evaluated these, lends some support to the notion of consumers as
advertising literate. The young adults certainly showed themselves
to be agile and active readers ofadvertising texts (Scott 1994). They
were competent and confident consumers of advertising, and more.
Friestad and Wright (1994) argue that consumers respond to persuasive communications based on their intuitive theories and "folk
knowledge" about persuasion. In this study, the young adults'
discussion of various advertiser objectives, options and budget
restrictions indicates the possession of well-developed "schemer
schema" (Wright 1986) and the ability to adopt the role of surrogate
strategists in their encounters with advertising.
Literacy does not refer to a neutral set of skills, however, but
to how, why, and in what context those skills are applied (Maybin
1993). This perspective is as relevant to advertising as it is to olher
REFERENCES
Anderson, Benedict (1983), Imagined Communities: Reflections
on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, London: Verso
Askegaard, Soren and Ger, Guliz(1997), Product-Country Images:
Towards a Contextualized Approach, in Basil G. Englis and
Anna Olofsson (eds), European Advances in Consumer Research, 3, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 5058
Bauman, Zigmunt (1990),"Modernity and Ambivalence", in Mike
Featherstone (ed). Global Culture: Nationalism, Globalization
and Modernity, London: Sage
Bauman, Zigmunt (1996) "From Pilgrim to Tourist-or a Short
History of Identity", in Stuart Hall and Paul du Gay (eds).
Questions of Cultural Identity, London: Sage, 18-36
Biel, Alexander (1990), "Love the Ad. Buy the Producll",Admap,
September, 21-25
Brown, Alice, McCrone, David, and Paterson, Lindsay (1996),
Politics and Society inScotland, London: Macmillan Press Ltd
Cohen, Robin (1995), Frontiers of Identity: the British and the
Others, London: Longman
Colley, Linda (1992), Britons: Forging the Nation, 1707-1837,
New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Cova, Bernard (1997), "Community and Consumption: towards a
Definition of the 'Linking Value' of Product or Services",
European Journal of Marketing, 31 (3/4) 297-316
Crick, Bernard (ed) (1992) National Identities: the Constitution of
the United Kingdom, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers
Scott, Linda (1994) "The bridge from text to mind: adapting readerresponse theory to consumer KsezxcW, Journal of Consumer
Research, 21, December, 461-480
Smith, Anthony (1986), The Ethnic Origins of Nations, Oxford:
Basil Biackwell
Smith, Anthony (1995), Nations and Nationalism in a Global Era,
Cambridge: Polity Press
Spradley, J.P. (1979) The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt,
Rinehart and Winston
Stern, Barbara B (1989) "Literary criticism and consumer research:
overview and illustrative analysis". Journal of Consumer Research, 16, December, 322-334
Wright, Peter (1986) 'Schemer schema: consumers' intuitive
theories about marketers' influence tactics', in RJ. Lutz (ed)
Advances in Consumer Research, 13, Provo, UT: Association
for Consumer Research, 1-3
Zagratzki, Uwe (1996) A Small Nation's Dilemma-Scotland's
Struggle for a Cultural Identity, Scottish Tradition, 21,1-29