Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bioresource Technology
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biortech
h i g h l i g h t s
Hyperthermophilic, alkalophilic, halophilic bacteria enriched from oil well.
Bacterial consortium enhanced oil recovery at 96 C in core ood studies.
96 C is the highest temperature reported for Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery.
Microbial metabolites aiding oil recovery at 96 C were identied.
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 10 January 2014
Received in revised form 12 March 2014
Accepted 15 March 2014
Available online xxxx
Keywords:
Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery (MEOR)
Sand pack
Core ood
Hyperthermophile
a b s t r a c t
A consortium of bacteria growing at 91 C and above (optimally at 96 C) was developed for the recovery
of crude oil from declining/depleted oil reservoirs having temperature of more than 91 C. PCR-DGGESequencing analysis of 16S rRNA gene fragments of NJS-4 consortium revealed the presence of four
strains identied as members of the genus Clostridium. The metabolites produced by NJS-4 consortium
included volatile fatty acids, organic acids, surfactants, exopolysaccarides and CO2, which reduced viscosity, emulsied crude oil and increased the pressure that facilitated displacement of emulsied oil towards
the surface. NJS-4 enhanced oil recovery by 26.7% and 10.1% in sand pack trials and core ood studies
respectively in optimized nutrient medium comprised of sucrose and sodium acetate as carbon/energy
source and urea as nitrogen source (pH 79, 96 C, and 4% salinity). Nutrient medium for MEOR was
constituted using commercial grade cheap nutrients to improve the economic viability of MEOR process.
2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
1. Introduction
A petroleum reservoir is a subsurface pool of hydrocarbons contained in porous or fractured rock formations. There are three main
stages by which oil is recovered from reservoir. The rst stage is
the primary recovery stage where oil is recovered due to natural
energy inherent in the reservoir. Expansion of the dissolved gas
following reduced pressure as a consequence of drilling operations
is usually responsible for the driving energy that carries oil to the
surface. When inherent pressure of reservoir tends to fall, secondary recovery methods are applied. In this method external uid or
gases are injected to maintain reservoirs pressure. Primary and
secondary oil recovery processes can account for 3040% oil
productions leaving behind about 55% of oil as residual oil in the
reservoirs (Sen, 2008). A third stage of oil recovery called tertiary
recovery or enhanced oil recovery involves chemical ooding, thermal recovery and miscible displacement involving carbon dioxide
(CO2), hydrocarbon or nitrogen injection. Enhanced oil recovery
methods are not cost effective (Al-Sulaimani et al., 2011). So there
is need to develop alternate strategy for oil recovery.
Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery (MEOR) is one among the
most promising novel approaches that can be potentially
implemented with an exceptionally low operating cost (Lazar et
al., 2007). MEOR processes can be categorized into three main
types. (i) In the rst type of MEOR process, bacteria are grown ex
situ. The culture broth, with or without bacterial cells, is injected
in the oil wells in a process similar to chemical ooding. The
microbial metabolites such as organic acids, biosurfactants and
solvents, then remove adhered oil as well as parafn deposits from
well surfaces including tubing, rods, etc. Such type of MEOR
process helps overcome clogging related problems which reduce
oil production. This process is usually applicable to oil reservoirs
rich in parafn contents where parafn clogs the well bores
decreasing the efciency of oil recovery. (ii) In the second type of
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.109
0960-8524/ 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Please cite this article in press as: Arora, P., et al. Development of a microbial process for the recovery of petroleum oil from depleted reservoirs at 91
96 C. Bioresour. Technol. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.109
Please cite this article in press as: Arora, P., et al. Development of a microbial process for the recovery of petroleum oil from depleted reservoirs at 91
96 C. Bioresour. Technol. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.109
Table 1
Nutritional and growth parameters affecting growth of NJS4.
Parameters
Characteristics
Temperature range
Optimum
temperature
pH range
Optimum pH
Salt range
Optimum salt
concentration
Cystine HCL
requirement
Utilizable carbon
source
Most suitable
carbon source
Utilizable nitrogen
source
85107 C
96
Most suitable
nitrogen source
Optimized medium
for growth
Growth period
Pathogenicity
511
79
111% w/v
4% w/v
00.5 g/L
Glucose, sucrose, lactose, starch, sodium citrate and
sodium acetate
Sucrose
Ammonium sulphate, urea, potassium nitrate,
ammonium nitrate, Di-ammonium hydroxy
orthophosphate (DAHOP), ammonium chloride
Urea
Sucrose (1%), sodium acetate (%), urea (0.5%), K2HPO4
(0.7%), KH2PO4 (0.3%), trace element solution (1 ml/L),
pH = 9
14 days
Non toxic in oral and dermal pathogenicity testing
NJS4 and CO2 production was the highest when glucose was used
as carbon- and urea as nitrogen source. Growth was the lowest
when Di-hydrogen ammonium phosphate was used as a source
of nitrogen. Several species of Clostridium have been reported to
utilize a wide range of carbohydrate substrates (Rainey et al.,
2009). Interestingly, sodium acetate has not been included as an
utilizable substrate for Clostridium in the same description.
Evolution of large quantities of gases is a desired trait in MEOR
as it increases the reservoir pressure and the dissolution of carbon
dioxide which is known to cause oil swelling, viscosity reduction
and increase permeability due to solubilization of carbonate rocks
(Al Sulaimani et al., 2011). In the present investigation NJS4 consortium produced signicant quantities of gas when grown in presence of fermentable substrates (56 ml/g sucrose at 96 C). Carbon
dioxide was the major component (>48 mM) of gas produced by
NJS4. Hydrogen was produced in traces and Methane was not detected in the GC analysis. CO2 yield reported here was signicant
as compared to the previous report wherein Bacillus licheniformis
produced 21.4 mM CO2 at 50 C and reported oil recovery of
922% (Yakimov et al., 1997). In another study, genetically
engineered bacteria produced 11.44 mM CO2 at 45 C resulting in
1725% oil recovery (Xu and Lu, 2011). Dissolution of carbonaceous rocks is also caused by organic acids produced by
microorganisms resulting in increased reservoir permeability and
porosity. Enhanced organic acid production by NJS4 was observed
in this study when sucrose was the source of carbon and ammonium sulfate/potassium nitrate/ammonium nitrate as nitrogen
source (Table 2). NJS produced 508 mg/L of exopolysaccharide
(EPS) when sucrose and acetate were used as carbon- and urea
as nitrogen source (Table 2). EPS has been reported to improve
sweep efciency and enhance oil recovery by selective plugging
of high permeability zone redirecting the water-ood to oil-rich
zones in the reservoir and by altering the wettability of reservoir
to displace more oil from the formation rocks (Lazar et al., 2007).
Biosurfactant production was monitored in terms of emulsication index (EI). The highest EI (43%) obtained with sodium acetate
as carbon source provided evidence that the NJS4 had the ability to
produce surface active agents, which can reduce the interfacial
tension, thus enhancing oil mobility. Higher biosurfactant production by NJS4 with sodium acetate as compared to that with
carbohydrate substrates was contradictory to previous reports
where biosurfactant production is enhanced by mono-, di- or
polysaccharides (Prasad et al., 2013). EI has been repeatedly used
to evaluate the potential of microorganisms to produce biosurfactants. Prasad et al. (2013) reported high EI of 85% for Pseudomonas
aeruginosa MTCC2297. The lower EI observed in the present
investigation could be attributed to the lower growth of
hyperthermophilic consortium at 96 C as compared to that of
mesophilic MTCC2297 strain at 37 C. NJS4 also produced organic
solvents including methanol (12,650 mg/L) and ethanol (77 mg/L)
in a medium containing sucrose & sodium acetate as carbon source
and urea as nitrogen source (Table 2). These organic solvents also
aided in solubilization of oil.
Ability of NJS4 to enhance crude oil recovery was evaluated in
sand pack trials and core ood studies using medium that consisted of sucrose (supported high growth and CO2 production)
and sodium acetate (high biosurfactant production) as carbon
source, urea as nitrogen source and yeast extract in trace amount
to satisfy growth factor requirement. Precipitation resulting from
the partial denaturation of carbohydrate at high temperature was
negligible when urea was used as a nitrogen source. Oil recovery
by NJS4 was 26.7% over oil in place as against to only 1% in uninoculated control (Table 3). Shavandi et al. (2011) reported 70%
residual oil recovery in sand pack studies. Signicantly higher oil
recovery reported in that study may be attributed to MEOR
performed in mesophilic temperature (30 C) using light oil. It
Please cite this article in press as: Arora, P., et al. Development of a microbial process for the recovery of petroleum oil from depleted reservoirs at 91
96 C. Bioresour. Technol. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.109
Table 2
Metabolite analysis of NJS4 consortium grown in media supplemented with various carbon or nitrogen sources. Metabolites were analyzed after incubation of 14 days at 96 C.
CO2 (mM)
a
b
c
d
Cell density
E.Ib (%)
EPSc
Maleic
Carbon source
Glucose
Lactose
Sucrose
Starch
Sodium acetate
Sodium citrate
48.6
39.8
36.5
33.2
29.58
22.6
16.0 107
8.0 107
4.0 107
1.6 107
4.0 106
2.4 107
20
43.3
40
+
+
+
Nitrogen source
Urea
Ammonium sulphate
Potassium nitrate
DAHOPd
Ammonium chloride
Ammonium nitrate
Sucrose + Na acetate + Urea
48.1
23.7
19.1
14.6
19.3
22.6
49.02
4.0 107
3.2 107
8.0 106
1.2 107
1.6 107
2.8 107
8.0 106
9.4
10.3
6.6
26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+(508 mg/L)
Solventsa (mg/L)
Formic
Acetic
Met
Eth
273.6
47.34
448
56.77
301.2
104
41.6
2193
5301
859
160
1974
737
753
602
50
828
927.7
404
454
720
308.3
193
354
5900
12,650
77
Table 3
Oil recovery in sand pack trials and core ood studies.
Sand pack study
Volume of sand
Void volume
Volume of residual oil in column after water ooding
Oil recovered after 14 days of incubation at 96 C
Percent oil recovery
500 ml
192 ml
90 ml
24 ml
26.7%
Value
Type of oil
Pour point
Specic gravity
Viscosity gravity constant (VGC)
Heavy
31 C
0.842
0.7873
Sandstone Berea
7.0 cm
3.8 cm2
23.8 ml
620 mD
18.3 ml
37.40%
10.10%
500 ml
192 ml
90 ml
24 ml
26.7%
may be noted that the oil used in the present study was heavy oil
and also MEOR was performed at 96 C.
Efciency of NJS4 to enhance oil recovery was also investigated
by core ood trials. Characteristics of the crude oil and core used in
this experiment are described in Table 3. In the core ood study, oil
recovery was 10.1% over residual oil saturation (ROS). Previous report has described 5.6% increase in oil recovery at 70 C in an oil
displacement system employing the injection of bacteria (Jinfeng
et al., 2005). MEOR at temperatures exceeding 82 C was never
reported in 1970s. Wilhelms et al. (2001) suggested that MEOR
related activities such as partial degradation of hydrocarbons were
inhibited at temperatures higher than 8090 C. Failure to cultivate
reservoir organisms at temperatures above 82 C was reported by
Bernard et al. (1992). Stetter (2006) could cultivate reservoir
4. Conclusion
The results show that the consortium, characterized as hyperthermophilic, halophilic, and anaerobic microorganisms, presented
the ability to improve the recovery of heavy oil in sand pack and
core ood assay. This culture produced metabolic products which
interacted with oil and increased its mobility. The mechanisms
involved were the reduction of interfacial tension by surface-active
agents, reduction of oil viscosity by acids and solvents, repressurization by gases and wettability change by biopolymer.
Acknowledgements
Gratefully acknowledged: (i) Financial assistance from Institute
of Reservoir Studies, ONGC, Ahmedabad and (ii) CSIR-JRF to Preeti
Arora by Government of India.
References
Al-Sulaimani, H., Joshi, S., Al-Wahaibi, Y., Al-Bahry, S., Elshae, A., Al-Bemani, A.,
2011. Microbial biotechnology for enhancing oil recovery: current
developments and future prospects. Biotechnol. Bioinform. Bioeng. 1, 147158.
Babcock, J.A., Lal, B., Soni, B., 2009. Process for enhanced oil recovery using a
microbial consortium. US Patent WO 2009009382 A2.
Bernard, F.P., Jacques, C., Aquitaine, E., Michel, M., Elf-Biorecherches, S., 1992.
Indigenous microorganisms in connate water of many oil elds: a new tool in
exploration and production techniques. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference
and Exhibition, 47 October 1992, Washington, DC. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/
24811-MS.
Jinfeng, L., Lijun, M., Bozhong, M., Rulin, L., Fangtian, N., Jiaxi, Z., 2005. The eld pilot
of microbial enhanced oil recovery in a high temperature petroleum reservoir. J.
Pet. Sci. Eng. 48, 265271.
Lazar, I., Petrisor, I.G., Yen, T.F., 2007. Microbial enhanced oil recovery (MEOR). Pet.
Sci. Technol. 25, 13531366.
Muyzer, G., Hottentrger, S., Teske, A., Waver, C., 1995. Denaturing gradient gel
electrophoresis of PCR-amplied 16S rDNAa new molecular approach to
analyse the genetic diversity of mixed microbial communities. In: Akkermans,
A.D.L., van Elsas, J.D., de Bruijn, F.J. (Eds.), Molecular Microbial Ecology Manual,
second ed. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 3.4.4.13.4.4.22.
Please cite this article in press as: Arora, P., et al. Development of a microbial process for the recovery of petroleum oil from depleted reservoirs at 91
96 C. Bioresour. Technol. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.109
Shavandi, M., Mohebali, G., Haddadi, A., Shakarami, H., Nuhi, A., 2011.
Emulsication potential of a newly isolated biosurfactant-producing
bacterium, Rhodococcus sp. strain TA6. Colloids Surfaces B 82, 477482.
Stetter, K.O., 2006. Hyperthermophiles in the history of life. Philos. Trans. R. Soc.
Lond. B 361, 18371842.
Wilhelms, A., Larter, S.R., Head, I., Farrimond, P., di-Primio, R., Zwach, C., 2001.
Biodegradation of oil in uplifted basins prevented by deep-burial sterilization.
Nature 411, 10341037.
Xiao, M., Zhang, Z.-Z., Wang, J.-X., Zhang, G.-Q., Luo, Y.-J., Song, Z.-Z., Zhang,
J.-Y., 2013. Bacterial community diversity in a low-permeability oil
reservoir and its potential for enhancing oil recovery. Bioresour.
Technol. 147, 110116.
Xu, Y., Lu, M., 2011. Microbially enhanced oil recovery at simulated reservoir
conditions by use of engineered bacteria. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 78, 233238.
Yakimov, M.M., Amro, M.M., Bock, M., Boseker, K., Fredrickson, H.L., Kessel, D.,
Timmis, K.N., 1997. The potential of Bacillus licheniformis strains for in situ
enhanced oil recovery. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 18, 147160.
Zhou, J., Bruns, M.A., Tiedje, J.M., 1996. DNA recovery from soils of diverse
composition. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62, 316322.
Please cite this article in press as: Arora, P., et al. Development of a microbial process for the recovery of petroleum oil from depleted reservoirs at 91
96 C. Bioresour. Technol. (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.109