Professional Documents
Culture Documents
white paper
Introduction
Wi-Fi networks are seeing increased utilization and load across organizations in most
industries. High-density wireless networks are typically considered to be environments
where the number of client devices and required application throughput exceed the
available capacity of a traditional coverage-oriented Wi-Fi network design. In
these situations, even a well-designed wireless network that provides coverage at
good signal strength and SNR (signal-to-noise ratio) throughout the desired coverage
area is insufficient to ensure high performance due to inadequate capacity. The
limiting factor is available airtime. Since Wi-Fi relies on a shared and unbounded
medium (that is, the air), clients and access points must contend for available airtime
to transmit data.
The Wi-Fi link between a client and access point is shared among all clients within
range of one another on a particular frequency. Therefore, signal strength as an
indication of link quality is not analogous to a wired link connection indicator.
Instead, aggregate capacity demands must be determined across the entire client
population and the network must be designed to distribute the load effectively
across the available spectrum. Spectral capacity, channel utilization, interference,
frequency reuse, and regulatory requirements become the critical design variables in
addition to coverage and signal strength. This requires a detailed analysis of client
capabilities, application requirements, facility characteristics, and the appropriate
use of sufficient access points. The goal is to segment clients into the smallest possible
collision domains (different radio frequencies) while maximizing the use of available
spectral capacity.
This whitepaper outlines a set of simple principles that you can use as a basic guide
when designing your high-density network. This list of principles is not meant to be
comprehensive but rather a quick overview of the most important items to take into
account.
This document presents a condensed overview of the design recommendations in
the High-Density Wi-Fi Design and Configuration Guide, which is available on the
Aerohive.com website.
Wi-Fi
Radio Type
Channel
Support*
Channel Width
Transmit
Power Output
Maximum
Data Rate
20 MHz/40 MHz
Feature
Phones
802.11b/g
1-11
20 MHz Only
11dBm
54 Mbps
Smart Phones
802.11n
1x1:1
1-11
20 MHz Only
11 dBm
65-72 Mbps
Tablets
802.11n
1x1:1
1-11, 36-48,
149-161
20 MHz Only
11-14 dBm
65-72 Mbps
Netbooks
802.11n
1x2:2
1-11, 36-48,
149-161
20/40 MHz
11-17 dBm
72 Mbps (Up)
144/300 Mbps
(Down)
Low-End
Laptops
Mid-Range
Laptops
802.11n
2x2:2
802.11n
2x3:2
1-11
20 MHz Only
17-20 dBm
144 Mbps
20/40 MHz
17-20 dBm
144/300 Mbps
High-End
Laptops
802.11n
3x3:3
20/40 MHz
17-20 dBm
216/450 Mbps
VoIP Handsets
802.11a/b/g
20 MHz Only
11-16 dBm
54 Mbps
1-11, 36-48,
149-161
1-11, 36-48, 5264, 100-140,
149-161
1-11, 36-48,
149-161
* This chart references channels from the FCC regulatory domain only.
Principle #4: Identify the Target Application Throughput Level for Each Device Type
Once the client devices and radio capabilities have been identified, determine the
applications that will be used and the application performance requirements
(throughput and QoS) for each device. A thorough understanding of the application
requirements will provide the necessary information to design a network that meets
organizational needs. Through this process, the organization can identify the critical
and non-critical applications used on each device and establish the target
application throughput level per device that is required for successful operation.
Common application classes and typical bandwidth requirements are listed in the
table below. Additionally, the recommended QoS class for both Layer 2 and Layer 3
is provided. The QoS classes are based on common network best practices, but
should be tailored to each environment to ensure integration with existing network
policies and consistent end-to-end QoS implementation.
Web-browsing/email
WMM 0 (BE)/DSCP 0
Application Class
WMM 5 (VI)/DSCP
AF41 (34)
WMM 4 (VI)/DSCP
CS4 (32)
WMM 4 (VI)/DSCP
CS4 (32)
WMM 4 (VI)/DSCP
CS4 (32)
WMM 5 (VI)/DSCP
AF41 (34)
11.5 Mbps
25 Mbps
Apple TV 5 streaming
2.58 Mbps
Apple FaceTime6
900 Kbps
500 Kbps
WMM 0 (BE)/DSCP 0
Printing
1 Mbps
WMM 0 (BE)/DSCP 0
File Sharing8
5 Mbps
WMM 0 (BE)/DSCP 0
WMM 4 (VI)/DSCP
CS4 (32)
WMM 4 (VI)/DSCP
9
10
Thin-client (example: RDP , XenDesktop )
85150 Kbps
CS4 (32)
WMM 4 (VI)/DSCP
Thin-client (with video or printing)
6001,800 Kbps
CS4 (32)
WMM
4 (VI)/DSCP
Thin-apps (example: XenApp 11)
20 Kbps (per App)
CS4 (32)
Uses available
WMM 1(BK)/DSCP
Device Backups (example: cloud services)
bandwidth
CS1 (8)
WMM 3 (BE)/DSCP
VoIP Call Signaling (example: SIP)
5 Kbps
CS3 (24)
WMM
6 (VO)/DSCP
VoIP Call Stream (codec 12 dependent)
2793 Kbps
EF (46)
These application classes are provided as a generic reference only. Network administrators
should research specific application requirements from the product developer.
E-Learning and Online Testing
24 Mbps
Principle #6: The 5 GHz Frequency Band Offers Greater Capacity than the 2.4 GHz Band
The amount of available unlicensed spectrum bounds the total capacity of a Wi-Fi
network composed of multiple co-located and adjacent cells. A cohesive wireless
network requires coverage overlap between adjacent cells to facilitate
uninterrupted service for mobile clients as they roam through the environment. A
high-density wireless network also requires co-located Wi-Fi radios serving the same
coverage area to meet the capacity demands of a large client population. All Wi-Fi
stations, including access points that operate on the same frequency, must contend
for airtime with one another. Therefore, placing multiple access points that are
operating on the same channel within the same physical service area does not
increase capacity. It has the opposite effect of increasing medium contention and
effectively reducing capacity.
It is critical that co-located and adjacent Wi-Fi cells operate on different frequencies
to reduce medium contention (co-channel interference) and increase network
capacity. When APs contend for airtime with one another, wireless professionals often
refer to it as co-channel interference (CCI) because it indicates improper network
design and can often be avoided. However, it is not truly interference and would be
more accurately described as co-channel contention. When Wi-Fi stations operate
on nonoverlapping frequencies, they cannot receive transmissions from one another,
and it less likely that their transmissions will interfere with one another. In effect, by
segmenting groups of Wi-Fi stations onto different frequencies, the collision domain is
made smaller. This serves to reduce medium contention to a smaller group of stations
and thereby increases capacity within each cell.
The total amount of spectrum available in the unlicensed frequency bands serves as
an upper bound for aggregate Wi-Fi network capacity. Sufficient spectral capacity is
required to provide both sufficient network capacity within a single coverage area
through the use of co-located APs and to provide enough nonoverlapping channels
for a channel reuse plan that minimizes co-channel interference between adjacent
coverage areas.
Significant differences in the amount of available unlicensed spectrum between the
2.4 GHz ISM band and the 5 GHz UNII bands influences network design. The 2.4 GHz
ISM band is comprised of only three nonoverlapping 20 MHz channels that can be
used for Wi-Fi networks (22 MHz-wide channels in the case of HR-DSSS used with
802.11b).
In Japan, four nonoverlapping channels are available, but channel 14 is restricted to
DSSS/CCK modulation (802.11b) and OFDM modulation (802.11g/n) cannot be used.
Due to the relatively sparse amount of spectrum available in the 2.4 GHz band, there
are typically not enough channels for multiple co-located APs to serve a high-density
client population without negatively affecting the nonoverlapping channel reuse
plan and introducing significant levels of co-channel interference. Therefore, in a
high-density network design, only a single 2.4 GHz AP radio should provide service
within a physical coverage area. Minimizing CCI between adjacent 2.4 GHz cells is a
primary high-density WLAN design consideration, yet even with sound design
practices, it is often not possible to completely eliminate CCI in the 2.4 GHz
frequency band due to inadequate spectral capacity.
The 5 GHz UNII bands comprises four unique frequency bands and a total of 23
nonoverlapping 20-MHz channels (24 channels when including UNII-2 Extended
channel 144, which was added with the 802.11ac amendment, and 25 channels
when including ISM channel 165). In contrast to the 2.4 GHz ISM band, the 5 GHz
bands offer much more spectral capacity for Wi-Fi networks. This facilitates greater
separation between access points operating on the same channel and allows for a
better frequency reuse plan. In high-density environments, multiple 5 GHz AP radios
can be physically co-located, using different channels, in order to increase capacity.
These factors make 5 GHz operation essential for successful high-density Wi-Fi network
deployments.
10
Principle #8: Provide High Quality Signal throughout the Coverage Areas
When designing a network for capacity, clients should connect to access points at
the highest data rates possible to maximize application throughput. This improves
overall network capacity by reducing individual client airtime utilization. Since airtime
is shared among all clients operating on the same channel and within range of one
another, this allows either additional clients to be supported or additional throughput
for existing clients.
11
This effectively reduces the Wi-Fi cell size at which clients should be associated to
individual APs. As clients move farther from the AP and signal strength declines
toward the -67 dBm threshold, they should be able to discover and roam to an
alternate AP that can continue to provide a sufficiently high-strength signal. This
requires that network administrators design the Wi-Fi network so that AP coverage
areas provide overlap at or above -67 dBm. When compared to a coverageoriented network, designed to provide signal in all locations at much lower levels (72 dBm for example), this effectively reduces cell sizing and distance between APs.
Access points will be located in closer proximity to one another in capacityoriented Wi-Fi networks.
12
The result of co-channel interference is that the Wi-Fi access points are effectively
sharing airtime and capacity with one another. For this reason, network administrators
cannot add capacity by simply installing more access points. Doing so without
careful consideration of the existing channel plan could result in access points
operating on the same channel within contention range of one another, which
results in capacity being shared between the APs rather than providing additional
capacity. Instead, additional access points should be integrated into the Wi-Fi
network design to operate on nonoverlapping channels to increase overall network
capacity.
Network administrators should design Wi-Fi cell overlap between neighboring APs on
different channels at -67dBm or greater and develop a channel plan that minimizes
co-channel interference between APs on the same channel below -85 dBm.
13
14
15
16
17
18
Principle #13: Use WPA2 (CCMP/AES) or Open Security, and Enable QoS
To use 802.11n data rates, the use of either WPA2-CCMP/AES or Open security is
required. Avoid selecting TKIP or WEP, which would result in limiting client operation to
legacy (802.11a/b/g) data rates per Wi-Fi Alliance certification requirements.
Use one of the following network security options:
19
20
A three spatial-stream 11n client might be able to send a large amount of traffic
within its allocated airtime, while a single spatial-stream 11n client might only be able
send a smaller amount of traffic. However, both clients get the same amount of
airtime to use unless you enable Dynamic Airtime Scheduling to allocate airtime
based on a dynamic assessment of a clients current throughput level versus a
defined Service Level Assurance (SLA) throughput level. This results in higher
throughput for faster clients without negatively penalizing slower clients.
21
Summary
Wireless networking offers many benefits over wired connections at the network
edge, including increased user mobility, always-on access to information and
resources, and improved productivity. Consumer adoption and understanding of
wireless technologies has proven rapid and substantial and has translated into
increased adoption within the workplace and in public venues. The coalescence of
several Wi-Fi networking trends is making deployment of high-density networks
increasingly common.
Design your high-density WLAN with sufficient focus on network planning and design
and ensure the network equipment that is purchased and deployed is capable of
delivering both high performance and intelligent features to optimize the use of
limited spectrum. Only through proper requirements gathering, network design,
configuration, and continual optimization can a Wi-Fi network be deployed that
meets the demands of a dense client population.
22
About Aerohive
Aerohive Networks reduces the cost and complexity of todays networks with cloudenabled, distributed Wi-Fi and routing solutions for enterprises and medium sized
companies including branch offices and teleworkers. Aerohives award-winning
cooperative control Wi-Fi architecture, public or private cloud-enabled network
management, routing and VPN solutions eliminate costly controllers and single points of
failure. This gives its customers mission critical reliability with granular security and policy
enforcement and the ability to start small and expand without limitations. Aerohive was
founded in 2006 and is headquartered in Sunnyvale, Calif. The companys investors
include Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, Lightspeed Venture Partners, Northern Light
Venture Capital and New Enterprise Associates, Inc. (NEA).
Corporate Headquarters
Aerohive Networks, Inc.
330 Gibraltar Drive
Sunnyvale, California 94089 USA
Phone: 408.510.6100
Toll Free: 1.866.918.9918
Fax: 408.510.6199
info@aerohive.com
www.aerohive.com
EMEA Headquarters
Aerohive Networks Europe LTD
The Court Yard
16-18 West Street, Farnham
Surrey, UK GU9 7DR
Phone: +44 (0) 1252 736590
Fax: +44 (0) 1252 711901
WP10121d