Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WACC = (1 t) rd (D / V) + rE (E/V)
T = corporate tax rate
rD = Cost of debt before tax
rE = Cost of equity after tax
D = Market value of Debt
E = Market value of Equity
V = Firm Value (D + E)
Each of the above variables are determined as follows:
T, Tax Rate
Tax Rate is equal to:
Total Taxes Paid / Total Income Before Taxes = 175.9 / 398.9 = .44 = 44%
These numbers are provided by the case study in Exhibit 1 in year 1987.
D, Market Value of Debt
D = .60; from Table A given as a target value for Debt per capital
E, Market Value of Equity
E = .40; from Table A assuming 60% of Marriotts target leverage goes to
debt, the remaining portion of its capital must go to equity:
(as V = D+E, so E must equal V-D)
V, Firm Value
V = .40 + .60 = 1
The remaining two components of WACC are the most major and influential. To solve for
these one must determine more key variables.
rD, Cost of debt
The case provides U.S. government fixed-rates for the current time period
which shows what Marriott would likely be paying on debt. Also, Marriott is
comprised of three primary divisions and one (lodging) uses long- term debt
and the other two (restaurant and contract services) use short-term debt. To
determine the exact rate of debt it is necessary to calculate a weighted
average amongst the potential interest rates for debt. From Table B, 30-year
(long-term) is 8.95% and 10-year (short-term) is at 8.72%.
Government Interest Paid = (8.95 + 8.72 + 8.72) / 3 = 8.80%
Full cost of debt is not just average government interest but also Marriotts
debt rate premium above the government average. As such:
To be converted back to a firm leverage level, apply the market value of debt and equity for
D and E of the equations
L = .6983 [1 + (1 - .44) ] = 1.2849
T, Tax Rate
Total Taxes Paid/Total Income Before Taxes = 175.9/398.9 = 44%
*Numbers are from year 1987.
D, Firms Value of Debt
The firms debt from 1987 is provided in exhibit 1: $2,498.8million
E, Firms Value of Equity
The firms equity from 1987 is provided in exhibit 1: $810.8million
V, Firms Value
The firms value is Debt + Equity: $3,309.6million
T, Tax Rate
Total Taxes Paid/Total Income Before Taxes = 175.9/398.9 = 44%
*Numbers are from year 1987
D, Firms Value of Debt
The firms debt from 1987 is provided in exhibit 1: $2,498.8million
E, Firms Value of Equity
The firms equity from 1987 is provided in exhibit 1: $810.8million
V, Firms Value
The firms value is Debt + Equity: $3,309.6million
RD, Cost of Debt Before Taxes
Table A in the case study provides the Debt Rate Premium Above
Government for restaurants (1.80). Table B provides the government
interest rates for 1988 for a 1-year maturity (6.90); a 1-year maturity was
used since the restaurants division is consider short-term. In determining
the cost of debt for restaurants, the following formula was used:
RD = Government Interest Rate + Debt Rate Premium for Restaurants
therefore, RD = 6.90 + 1.80 = 8.70%
RE, Cost of Equity After Taxes
Ultimately, the CAPM formula (RF + [RF - RM]*) was used to determine the
cost of equity. However, in order to use this formula, we must first determine
they unlevered for restaurants. To find the unleveraged , we took the sum
of the weighted unlevered betas. Six companies were used in calculating the
unlevered beta; the companies most similar to the restaurants division were
weighted more heavily. Once the weight was determined, the weighted beta
was determined. The unlevered beta was then calculated for each
comparative restaurant using the following formula:
u = /1+(1-T)(D/E)
u = Weighted unlevered beta for each comparative company
L = u [1+(1-T)(D/E)]
L = Beta for the restaurants division (levered)
u = Weighted unlevered beta for the restaurants division