Professional Documents
Culture Documents
h i g h l i g h t s
The effect of stabilization on resilient modulus of a Class F y ash by the means of cyclic triaxial testing.
Although the conning pressure supplied by air was practical to use, it was difcult to maintain exact target pressure.
Under the same stress paths samples having higher cement or lime contents exhibited lower strains.
The rate of axial strains under corresponding stress paths decreased with increasing cement or lime content.
There was a nonlinear relationship between axial strain and deviator stress.
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 27 July 2013
Received in revised form 5 December 2013
Accepted 16 December 2013
Available online 9 January 2014
Keywords:
Highway
Fly ash
Resilient modulus
Pavement analyses
Mechanistic-empirical design
Cyclic triaxial testing
Indirect tensile testing
a b s t r a c t
The disposal of industrial by-products constitutes a mounting problem of global dimensions. Among
these, the disposal of y ash is very problematic, for the increasing demand for electricity from coal burning power stations has been resulting in growing amounts of stockpiled y ash, inevitably causing environmental problems. The use of this y ash in road pavements provides an opportunity to use high
volumes of this material, however, the ash needs to be stabilized to improve its performance when utilized in upper pavement layers. Because the principal input in mechanistic-empirical analyses is resilient
modulus, the aim of this study is to investigate the effect of stabilization on resilient modulus of a Class F
y ash.
2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
One of the most signicant detriments for the modern world is
waste production, with billions of tons of waste being generated
each year around the world. As a result of this, considerable attention has been given to the utilization of waste materials and other
by-products from different production processes. In the recent past
these materials were simply stockpiled and dumped as waste. In
the last few decades, however, the increasing amount of waste production and the diminishing availability of land ll sites have restrained the dumping of waste products. Therefore, the industries
producing waste materials now face an increasing nancial burden
(cost of disposal) and community concern regarding the potential
risk to the environment.
M. Aysen Lav, A. Hilmi Lav / Construction and Building Materials 54 (2014) 1016
2. Structure of highways
In general, highways consist of two parts: the pavements and
foundation. The pavements are engineering structures that separate the trafc loading (the tires of vehicles) from the foundation
(which is usually natural soil, also called subgrade) of roads. Subgrades are generally weak materials and may not be able to bear
the stresses induced by wheel loads. Therefore, pavements are
needed to decrease the stress to a tolerable level in the subgrade.
As an engineering structure, pavements should not fail during their
design life. Unlike most civil engineering structures, pavement failure does not happen unexpectedly like the collapse of a bridge or
building, but gradually deteriorates over time. That means that
the emergence of cracks and the accumulation of plastic deformation up to an unallowable level are considered as design failures.
This pavement failure eventually decreases or totally eliminates
the function of the structure. Pavement design aims to prevent
the failure of the pavement over its design life which is usually
2030 years.
Regarding the design of y ash pavements, mechanistic-empirical methods are preferred as empirical design methods are restricted to the range of classical pavement materials. In the
mechanistic-empirical method, the stress induced by wheel loading is calculated in order to identify the mechanical responses in
the structure (pavement analysis), usually by means of purpose
built computer programs. The mechanical responses are basically
deections, stresses, strains and displacements. In order to perform
a pavement analysis, the fundamental properties of the y ash
(along with other pavement materials used) should be measured.
Stiffness is the most important fundamental property of a pavement materials and it is expressed by resilient modulus, which
can be obtained by advanced laboratory tests explained below.
11
and the minimum particle sizes were 116 and 0.13 lm for cement,
and 152 and 0.2 lm for lime.
As mentioned previously, y ash should be stabilized to improve its performance when utilized in upper layers of pavements
since stress and strains due to vehicle loadings are signicant at
the top layers of pavements. In addition, Class F ashes exhibit lower
stiffness than Class C ashes due to their low calcium content. However, an uncommon application of 100% y ash base with no additive or aggregate was attempted in 1988 at Fulshear, Texas, USA.
After placement and compaction, the average compressive
strength increased only 255 kPa, with between 7 days and 28 days
of curing. Also, in four months time it was seen that the asphalt
layer at the top became corrugated in some sections. The trial
was considered to be a failure [2] and, henceforth, that kind of testing was not again attempted.
In our study, cement and lime were used separately to stabilize
the y ash. These were mixed as percentages by total weight (e.g.
10% lime or cement stabilized y ash means that 10 g stabilizing
agent was mixed with 90 g of y ash). All of the stabilized samples
that required curing before testing were wrapped in plastic bags
and cured in a room with controlled humidity and temperature
(23 C and 50% humidity) until the test date.
12
M. Aysen Lav, A. Hilmi Lav / Construction and Building Materials 54 (2014) 1016
Fig. 2. Repeated load indirect tensile modulus test results for lime stabilized y ash
samples.
Fig. 1. Repeated load indirect tensile modulus test results for cement stabilized y
ash samples.
cylindrical sample. The system is not able to represent all conditions (triaxial) because two of the principal stresses are equal (conning stress or cell pressure). There are a few true triaxial
machines available with rigid boundaries using a cube sample
[11], but the common triaxial system gives good results and is suitable for testing of pavement materials. Although the method is
ranked number one by AUSTROADS [6] for the testing of granular
pavement materials, it is equally effective on stabilized pavement
materials, including waste materials [12,13].
In pavement layers under trafc loading, each stress has a constant value from overburden, and the passing wheel load causes an
additional transient value. Transient stress may be simulated by
deviator stress (vertical), while the overburden is simulated by
conning pressure (horizontal). Consequently, the repeated load
triaxial test corresponds to actual stress conditions, however, for
the lower section of the stabilized y ash layers, tensile stresses
may be developed in the horizontal direction (due to exure) and
this situation cannot be reproduced in the repeated load triaxial
test. According to Brown [14], this case may not diminish the
M. Aysen Lav, A. Hilmi Lav / Construction and Building Materials 54 (2014) 1016
Fig. 4. Effect of lime content and curing on indirect tensile strain for single pulse of
300 N.
13
14
M. Aysen Lav, A. Hilmi Lav / Construction and Building Materials 54 (2014) 1016
Fig. 11. Nonlinear resilient modulus of 10% cement stabilized y ash samples.
Fig. 12. Nonlinear resilient modulus of 10% lime stabilized y ash samples.
M. Aysen Lav, A. Hilmi Lav / Construction and Building Materials 54 (2014) 1016
15
Table 1
Laboratory testing program.
Test method
Complying standard
Parameters obtained
ASTM D 4123
7,28,180,300
90
MR k1 fr
MR k1 hk2
where MR is the Resilient modulus, h is the sum of the principal
stresses (sum of the rst stress invariant/bulk stress; r1 + r2 + r3),
k1 and k2 are the constants depend on the cement or lime content.
Although it is generally used for granular materials, the kh
model closely ts the triaxial results of stabilized y ash as presented in Figs. 512. According to Raad and Figueroa [33], the model is valid even for h values that approach failure for granular
materials, but the usual practice is to apply stresses well below
failure to avoid excessive permanent strains with which this study
compiles this rule.
6. Summary of testing program
In order to keep the readers follow testing program easier, all
the laboratory testing program is summarized in Table 1.
7. Environmental concerns
While the aim of current studies has been to investigate the
suitability of y ash as pavement material where high amounts
of the material may be used, this utilization also raises some concerns that the toxic elements in y ash may leach out to the environment. Although this concern is beyond the scope of this paper, a
detailed leaching study of this material has been carried out and
published. This study found that the material is not hazardous in
terms of leaching characteristics [34].
8. Discussion and conclusions
In this study, repeated load indirect tensile and repeated load
triaxial (cyclic triaxial) tests were carried out to investigate the effects of stabilization on resilient behavior of y ash as pavement
material with the following outcomes:
16
M. Aysen Lav, A. Hilmi Lav / Construction and Building Materials 54 (2014) 1016
[3] Frocht MM. Photoelasticity. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 1964.
[4] Kennedy TW, Hudson WR. Application of the indirect tensile test to stabilized
materials. Highway Res Rec 1968;235:3648.
[5] Kennedy TW. Characterization of Asphalt pavement materials using the
indirect tensile test. Assoc Asphalt Pavement Technol 1977;46:13249.
[6] AUSTROADS Pavement Design A. Guide to the structural design of road
pavements. AUSTROADS: Publication; 1992: No. AP-17/92.
[7] De Vos KB, UMATTA. Universal materials testing apparatus for asphalt and
unbound specimens. Reference and Operating Manual. IPC Limited; 1992.
[8] ASTM D 4123. Standard test method for indirect tension test for resilient
modulus of bituminous mixture. Am Soc Test Mater 1996;04(03):4235.
[9] Seed HB, McNeill RL. Soil deformation under repeated stress applications. In:
Proceedings of conference on soils for engineering purposes. Mexico; 1957.
[10] Grainger GD, Lister NW. A laboratory apparatus for studying the behaviour of
soils under repeated loading. Geotechnique 1962;12:314.
[11] Lanier J, Zitouni Z. Development of a data base using the grenoble true triaxial
apparatus. In: Proceeding of the international workshop on constitutive
equations for granular non-cohesive soils. Cleveland; 1988. p. 4758.
[12] Ullidtz P. Pavement analysis. Elsevier Science Publisher B.V.; 1987.
[13] Leite FC, Motta RS, Vasconcelos KL, Bernucc L. Laboratory evaluation of
recycled construction and demolition waste for pavements. Constr Build Mater
2011;25:29729.
[14] Brown SF. Improved framework for predicting permanent deformation in
asphalt layers. Trans Res Rec 1975;537:1829.
[15] FHWA. Predictive Design Procedures. VESYS Users manual. Report No. FHWARD-77-154. US Federal Highway Administration; 1978.
[16] Hicks GR, Monismith CL. Factors inuencing the resilient response of granular
materials. Highway Res Rec No. 45 1971:1531.
[17] Allen JT, Thompson MR. Resilient response of granular materials subjected to
time dependant lateral stresses. Trans Res Rec No. 510 1974:113.
[18] Brown SF, Selig ET. The design of pavement and rail truck foundations, cyclic
loading of soils: from theory to design, In: OReilly, Brown (Editors). Blackie;
1991. p. 249305.
[19] AASHTO Guide for design of pavement structures. American Association of
State Highway and Transportation Ofcials. Washington (DC); 1993.
[20] TRB Test Procedures for characterising dynamic stress strain properties of
pavement materials, special report 162. Transportation Research Board.
Washington (DC); 1975.
[21] Kalcheft JV, Hicks GR. A Test procedure for determining the resilient response
properties of granular materials. J Test Eval 1973;1:4729.
[22] Brown SF. Repeated load testing of a granular material. J Geotech Eng Div,
ASCE 1974:82541.
[23] Mallick RB, El-Korchi T. Pavement engineering. 1st ed. Boca Raton: CRC; 2009.
[24] Bilodeau JP, Dore G. Relating resilient behaviour of compacted unbound base
granular materials to matrix and interlock characteristics. Constr Build Mater
2012;37:2208.
[25] Brown SF, Pell PS. An experimental investigation of the stresses, strains and
deections in layered pavement structure subjected to dynamic loads. In: 2nd
International conference on structural design of asphalt pavements. Ann Arbor
(USA); 1967. p. 487504.
[26] Hicks RG, Monismith CL. Prediction of the resilient response of pavements
containing granular layers using non-linear elastic theory. In: Proceedings of
the 3rd international conference on asphalt pavements; 1972; 1: 41029.
[27] Huang YH. Pavement analyses and design. 2nd ed. New Jersey: PearsonsPrentice-Hall; 2004.
[28] Kim D, Kim JR. Resilient behaviour of compacted subgrade soils under
repeated triaxial test. Constr Build Mater 2007;21:14709.
[29] Brown SF, Pappin JW. Analysis of pavements with granular bases. Trans Res
Rec 1981;810:1722.
[30] Brown SF, Pappin JW. Modelling of granular materials in pavements. Trans Res
Rec 1985;1022:4551.
[31] Lee SW, Fishman KL. Waste products as highway materials in exible
pavement system. J Trans Eng, ASCE 1993;119:43349.
[32] Fossberg PE. Load-deformation characteristics of three-layer pavements
containing cement-stabilized base. PhD Dissertation. University of California
at Berkeley; 1970.
[33] Raad L, Figueroa JL. Load response of transportation support systems. Trans
Eng J, ASCE 1980;106:11128.
[34] Lav AH, Kenny PJ. Leaching characteristics of eraring (NSW) y ash as road
base material. Road&Trans Res, ARRB 1997;6:5263.