You are on page 1of 6

Performance appraisal rating

In this file, you can ref useful information about performance appraisal rating such as
performance appraisal rating methods, performance appraisal rating tips, performance appraisal
rating forms, performance appraisal rating phrases If you need more assistant for performance
appraisal rating, please leave your comment at the end of file.
Other useful material for you:
performanceappraisal123.com/1125-free-performance-review-phrases
performanceappraisal123.com/free-28-performance-appraisal-forms
performanceappraisal123.com/free-ebook-11-methods-for-performance-appraisal

I. Contents of getting performance appraisal rating


==================
Even though some major companies like Microsoft have decided to eliminate their stack ranking
systems, the controversial employee review process will never go away entirely.
Industries like defense and aerospace, for example, tend to value execution over creativity, so
need a way to measure and compare employees. Ranking workers on a bell curve that features a
set number of high, average, and poor performers meets that need.
But increasingly companies are moving in the opposite direction, and using an entirely ratingsfree system.
While it's still only a small fraction of businesses, around 6% according to Cliff Stevenson of
The Institute For Corporate Productivity, big names like Adobe, Expedia, and FedEx are among
the companies that no longer rank their employees. Instead, they focus on incremental or
divisional goals rather than on individual ones.
Advocates of stack ranking argue that such measures are required to spur internal competition
and weed out poor performers. However, companies that have stopped grading employees
altogether have seen positive results in employee engagement and no negative impact on any
performance metric, Stevenson's research found.
"The very concept of the performance review is very backwards-looking; it's 'What did you do
over the past year?'" Stevenson said. "Instead, they started looking more at development and
enabling employees for the coming year."

Feedback becomes continuous rather than being delivered a few times a year in an extremely
high-stress meeting.
"The concept is that you get your feedback not once a year or quarterly, but as things happen,"
Stevenson said. "As you finish a project, your manager has the discretion to come to you then
and talk to you about success or areas for development as they see fit."
It's a completely different, and arguably superior, way to manage people than rating and ranking
them.
The rigid, quarterly, numbers-focused stack ranking system came about as an effort to manage
large, distributed, and unwieldy workforces. But in an age when we have better data and a better
idea of what makes people tick, it's not necessary.
Especially for small businesses, where individual employees have an outsized impact on a
company's performance, touching base and rewarding employees as needed is a much better
option.
==================

III. Performance appraisal methods

1. Essay Method
In this method the rater writes down the employee
description in detail within a number of broad categories
like, overall impression of performance, promoteability
of employee, existing capabilities and qualifications of
performing jobs, strengths and weaknesses and training
needs of the employee. Advantage It is extremely
useful in filing information gaps about the employees
that often occur in a better-structured checklist.
Disadvantages It its highly dependent upon the writing
skills of rater and most of them are not good writers.
They may get confused success depends on the memory
power of raters.

2. Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales

statements of effective and ineffective behaviors


determine the points. They are said to be
behaviorally anchored. The rater is supposed to
say, which behavior describes the employee
performance. Advantages helps overcome rating
errors. Disadvantages Suffers from distortions
inherent in most rating techniques.

3. Rating Scale
Rating scales consists of several numerical scales
representing job related performance criterions such as
dependability, initiative, output, attendance, attitude etc.
Each scales ranges from excellent to poor. The total
numerical scores are computed and final conclusions are
derived. Advantages Adaptability, easy to use, low cost,
every type of job can be evaluated, large number of
employees covered, no formal training required.
Disadvantages Raters biases

4. Checklist method
Under this method, checklist of statements of traits of
employee in the form of Yes or No based questions is
prepared. Here the rater only does the reporting or
checking and HR department does the actual evaluation.
Advantages economy, ease of administration, limited
training required, standardization. Disadvantages Raters
biases, use of improper weighs by HR, does not allow
rater to give relative ratings

5.Ranking Method
The ranking system requires the rater to rank his
subordinates on overall performance. This consists in
simply putting a man in a rank order. Under this method,
the ranking of an employee in a work group is done
against that of another employee. The relative position of
each employee is tested in terms of his numerical rank. It
may also be done by ranking a person on his job
performance against another member of the competitive
group.
Advantages of Ranking Method
Employees are ranked according to their
performance levels.
It is easier to rank the best and the worst
employee.
Limitations of Ranking Method
The whole man is compared with another
whole man in this method. In practice, it is very difficult
to compare individuals possessing various individual
traits.
This method speaks only of the position where an
employee stands in his group. It does not test anything
about how much better or how much worse an employee
is when compared to another employee.
When a large number of employees are working,
ranking of individuals become a difficult issue.
There is no systematic procedure for ranking
individuals in the organization. The ranking system does
not eliminate the possibility of snap judgements.

6. Critical Incidents Method

The approach is focused on certain critical behaviors of


employee that makes all the difference in the
performance. Supervisors as and when they occur record
such incidents. Advantages Evaluations are based on
actual job behaviors, ratings are supported by
descriptions, feedback is easy, reduces recency biases,
chances of subordinate improvement are high.
Disadvantages Negative incidents can be prioritized,
forgetting incidents, overly close supervision; feedback
may be too much and may appear to be punishment.

III. Other topics related to Performance appraisal rating (pdf,


doc file download)
Top 28 performance appraisal forms
performance appraisal comments
11 performance appraisal methods
25 performance appraisal examples
performance appraisal phrases
performance appraisal process
performance appraisal template
performance appraisal system
performance appraisal answers
performance appraisal questions
performance appraisal techniques
performance appraisal format
performance appraisal templates
performance appraisal questionnaire
performance appraisal software
performance appraisal tools
performance appraisal interview
performance appraisal phrases examples
performance appraisal objectives
performance appraisal policy
performance appraisal letter
performance appraisal types

performance appraisal quotes


performance appraisal articles

You might also like