Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2012
Abstract
Keywords: numerical simulation, DC electric arc furnace, arc plasma, temperature field,
flow field
PACS: 52.50.Nr
DOI: 10.1088/1009-0630/14/4/10
Introduction
Studies in the field of metallurgy, production of refractories, and other industrial sectors have been carried out for many years. The expertise gained in the use
of a variety of metal treatment equipment leads to the
conclusion that DC electric arc furnaces (EAF) can be
effectively used in many technological applications [1] .
A twin-electrode DC submerged electric arc furnace
(SAF) was designed for MgO-crystal production. This
technique was also found as another effective method to
grow high quality MgO single crystals [2] . Because the
environment for crystal growth is significantly affected
by the arc behavior, a fundamental understanding of
the heat and fluid flow in the arc plasma is necessary.
Due to the hostile environment for observing the process occurring in the inner zone of the furnace, numerical simulations for similar processes are used to obtain
detailed information in some studies. USHIO et al. [3]
and SZEKELY et al. [4] conducted numerical simulations of a DC EAF using the turbulent Navier-Stokes
and Maxwell equations to predict the contributions of
the different mechanisms of heat transfer from the arc
to the bath. Recently, QIAN et al. [5] studied the arc
plasma by a similar method, and obtained some results
for different arc currents and anode-cathode distances.
WANG et al. [6] used the PHOENICS software package
to solve the governing equations and gave useful conclusions in arcs heat transfer and bath circulation. The
simulated results illustrated above [36] were all compared with experimental data by BOWMAN [7] . In his
study, BOWMAN measured plasma velocity distribu supported
Mathematical model
by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (No. 2008AA03A325)
(rv vr ) +
v +
(v vz )
r r
r
z
1 P
h v
v
1 vr i
=
+
e
+
r
r
r
r
r
1 v
1 h
vr i
h v
+
2e
+
+
e
r
r
r
z
z
1 vz i 2e 1 vr
v
v
vr v
+
+
+
.
r
r r
r
r
r
(3)
1
vz
vr
P
+ jr B +
e r
+
=
z
r r
r
z
(4)
1
1 vz
v
vz
e
+
2e
.
+
+
r
r
z
z
z
Energy conservation
1 (rvr h) 1 (v h) (vz h)
+
+
r
r
r
1
Ke h
1 Ke h
=+
r
+ 2
r r
cp r
r cp
+
z
Fig.1
5kB
+
2e
2.1
jr 2 + jz 2 + j 2
Sr
jr h jz h j h
+
+
cp r
cp z
cp
(5)
Hydrodynamic problem
Under the above assumptions, the governing equations can be expressed as follows:
Mass conservation
1
1
(rvr ) +
(v ) +
(vz ) = 0.
r r
r
z
(1)
rvr2 +
(vr v ) +
(vr vz )
r r
r r
z
P
vr 1 h 1 vr
1
=
2re
+
e
+
r
r r
r
r
r
h vz
v
v i
vr i
+
e
+
+
r
r
z
r
z
1 v
vr
v2
2e vr
+ jz B .
+
r
r
r
r
r
322
Ke h
cp z
(2)
(6)
The laminar components are derived from kinetic theory while the turbulent components are determined using the k turbulence model.
In the k turbulence model, incorporated into the
present calculations, the eddy viscosity t and eddy
thermal conductivity Kt are obtained from
t = C
k2
t cp
, Kt =
,
P rt
(7)
WANG Zhen et al.: Arc Plasma Behavior in a Submerged DC EAF for the Production of Fused MgO
where k is the turbulence kinetic energy, is the dissipation rate of the turbulence kinetic energy, P rt is the
turbulent prandtl number, and C is one of the constants of the model.
Two turbulence variables k and are obtained by
solving
1 (vr rk) 1 (v k) (vz k)
+
+
r
r
r
1
t k
= t +
r l +
r r
k r
+
1
r2
t k
t k
l +
+
l +
,
k
z
k z
(8)
and
1 (vr r) 1 (v ) (vz )
+
+
r
r
r
z
2
1
t
r l +
= C1 t C2 +
k
k
r r
r
1
+ 2
r
t
l +
+
l +
,
z
z
=2
vz
z
vr
r
1 v
vr
+
r
r
C1
C2
P rt
1.44
1.92
1.0
1.3
0.09
0.9
2.2
Electromagnetic problem
2.3
(9)
2 #
2
2
vr
vz
vz
v
+
+
+
+
r
z
z
r
Boundary conditions
2 #
r
J = 2JC 1
.
(13)
RC
The radius of the cathode spot is defined as
r
I
RC =
,
JC
2
1 vr
v
v
+
+
.
r
r
r
(10)
The constants in the turbulence model equations are
listed in Table 1.
Table 2.
where
"
Table 1.
(14)
where I is the arc current, and the average cathode current JC is given to be 3.5107 A m2 in the present
calculations [9] .
Surface
T (K)
(V)
ABB
vr = v = vz = 0
4000
Formula(13)
(/z) = 0
BBCC
vr = v = vz = 0
4000
(/z) = 0
(/z) = 0
CCDD
P =0
(T /z) = 0
((/z) = 0
(k/z) = 0
(/z) = 0
DDEE
vr = v = vz = 0
2000
(/r) = 0
(k/r) = 0
(/r) = 0
EEF
vr = v = vz = 0
3100
(/z) = 0
FA
vr = v = 0
(T /r) = 0
(/r) = 0
(k/z) = 0
(/z) = 0
323
2.4
Technique of solution
P L PN m
m1
i=1
i,k
k=1
i,k
< 0.01,
(15)
max
where is a general dependent variable, L and N are
the total number of nodes in the r- and z-directions,
respectively, and m is the number of iterations.
To validate the algorithm of the model, a comparison is made with BOWMANs measurements [7] in free
burning DC arcs. The temperature contours for an
arc of 2160 A with a length of 0.07 m are plotted in
Fig. 2(a). In Fig. 2(b) a comparison of the calculated
results from the model with the experimental data on
the axial temperature in the arc is shown. As is seen,
the temperature calculated is higher than the measured
one. The possible reason is that the assumption of LTE
is not valid near the cathode spot region. The flow field
is presented in Fig. 3(a). In Fig. 3(b) a comparison in
the axial velocity of the calculated results to the experimental data is shown. It can be seen that both match
well.
324
WANG Zhen et al.: Arc Plasma Behavior in a Submerged DC EAF for the Production of Fused MgO
in Fig. 6(b). These characteristics of a shorter arc may
lead to a higher efficiency of heat transfer. The arc efficiency here is defined as the ratio of the power absorbed
by the surrounding materials to the total power in the
arc.
The effect of the arc length on the pressure distribution at the anode surface is shown in Fig. 7. A
maximum pressure appears at the center of the anode. Blocked by the lateral wall, the pressure becomes
slightly higher near the fridge of the anode. It is apparent from this figure that a shorter arc length results in a higher pressure. Such a high pressure means
that the force generated by the impingement of the arc
jet on the bath surface can be very significant. The
arc plasma photographed by JONES et al. [8] exhibited
to be a high velocity turbulent self-constricted jet. A
crater-like depression caused by the arc in the surface
of the bath is clearly shown. The temperature, flow and
current density fields of the bath are then believed to
be significantly affected by the force. The interaction
between the arc plasma and the molten bath is worthy
of further study.
325
a. A model for a DC arc was developed. The predicted arc temperatures and velocities agree well with
the experimental data by BOWMAN.
b. The behavior of arcs in SAF for MgO production
is predicted by the model, including the temperature
field, the velocity field, and the pressure distribution
on the anode surface.
c. The calculated results show that the maximum
pressure at the anode surface is in an order of magnitude of 104 Pa, and the pressure distribution is affected by the arc length significantly. Modeling of the
bath considering impingement of such a jet is worthy
of further study.
d. The circulation of the high temperature air under
the electrode bottom in SAF can lead to a higher arc
efficiency, especially for a shorter arc.
References
Q = E J,
(17)
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Fig.8 Effect of arc length on the arc power and arc efficiency
326
Conclusions