Inputs-costs, Capacities, Demands

Demand Region Production and Transportation Cost Per 1,000,000 units

Supply Region
N. America
S. America
Europe
Asia
N. America
81
92
101
130
S. America
117
77
108
98
Europe
102
105
95
119
Asia
115
125
90
59
Africa
142
100
103
105
Demand
12
8
14
16
Decicsion Varibles
Supply Region
N. America
S. America
Europe
Asia
Africa
Contstraints
Supply Region
N. America
S. America
Europe
Asia
Africa

Demand Region - Production allocation (Million Units)

N. America
S. America
Europe
Asia
0
0
0
0
12
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
16
0
0
10
0

Excess Capacity
0
-20
0
-20
3
N. America

Unmet Demand
Objective Function
Cost

S. America
0

10851

Europe
0

Asia
0

Cost Per 1,000,000 units

Africa

Fixed Cost($)
115
100
111
74
71
7

Africa

Low Capacity
6000
4500
6500
4100
4000

Plants (1=open)
0
0
0
0
7

Africa
0

Fixed Cost ($)

10
10
10
10
10

Plants (1=open)
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
1

9000
6750
9750
6150
6000

High Capacity
20
20
20
20
20

Microsoft Excel 14.0 Answer Report

Worksheet: [Book1.xlsx]Sheet3
Report Created: 5/13/2015 10:13:01 AM
Result: Solver found an integer solution within tolerance. All Constraints are satisfied.
Solver Engine
Engine: GRG Nonlinear
Solution Time: 1.156 Seconds.
Iterations: 14 Subproblems: 8
Solver Options
Max Time Unlimited, Iterations Unlimited, Precision 0.000001, Use Automatic Scaling
Convergence 0.0001, Population Size 100, Random Seed 0, Derivatives Forward, Require Bounds
Max Subproblems Unlimited, Max Integer Sols Unlimited, Integer Tolerance 1%, Assume NonNegati
Objective Cell (Min)
Cell
$B$14

Name
baltimore atlanta

Original Value Final Value

0
0

Variable Cells
Cell
$B$14
$C$14
$D$14
$E$14
$F$14
$G$14
$H$14
$B$15
$C$15
$D$15
$E$15
$F$15
$G$15
$H$15
$B$16
$C$16
$D$16
$E$16
$F$16
$G$16
$H$16
$B$17
$C$17
$D$17
$E$17

Name
baltimore atlanta
baltimore boston
baltimore chicago
baltimore denver
baltimore omaha
baltimore portland
baltimore plants (1=open)
cheyene atlanta
cheyene boston
cheyene chicago
cheyene denver
cheyene omaha
cheyene portland
cheyene plants (1=open)
salt lake atlanta
salt lake boston
salt lake chicago
salt lake denver
salt lake omaha
salt lake portland
salt lake plants (1=open)
memphis atlanta
memphis boston
memphis chicago
memphis denver

Original Value Final Value

0
0
0
1.5999936
0
2.8
0
1.2
0
1.3999944
0
2.2
0
0
0
0
0
1.6000016
0
2.8
0
1.2
0
1.4000014
0
2.2
0
0
0
0
0
1.6000016
0
2.8
0
1.2
0
1.4000014
0
2.2
0
0
0
0
0
1.6000016
0
2.8
0
1.2

$F$17
$G$17
$H$17
$B$18
$C$18
$D$18
$E$18
$F$18
$G$18
$H$18

memphis omaha
memphis portland
memphis plants (1=open)
cwichita atlanta
cwichita boston
cwichita chicago
cwichita denver
cwichita omaha
cwichita portland
cwichita plants (1=open)

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

1.4000014
2.2
0
10
1.6000016
2.8
1.2
1.4000014
2.2
1

Constraints
Cell
$B$22
$B$23
$B$24
$B$25
$B$26
$B$29
$C$29
$D$29
$E$29
$F$29
$G$29
$B$14
$C$14
$D$14
$E$14
$F$14
$G$14
$B$15
$C$15
$D$15
$E$15
$F$15
$G$15
$B$16
$C$16
$D$16
$E$16
$F$16
$G$16
$B$17
$C$17

Name
baltimore excess capacity
cheyene excess capacity
salt lake excess capacity
memphis excess capacity
cwichita excess capacity
unmet demand atlanta
unmet demand boston
unmet demand chicago
unmet demand denver
unmet demand omaha
unmet demand portland
baltimore atlanta
baltimore boston
baltimore chicago
baltimore denver
baltimore omaha
baltimore portland
cheyene atlanta
cheyene boston
cheyene chicago
cheyene denver
cheyene omaha
cheyene portland
salt lake atlanta
salt lake boston
salt lake chicago
salt lake denver
salt lake omaha
salt lake portland
memphis atlanta
memphis boston

Cell Value

Formula
0 $B$22>=0
0 $B$23>=0
0 $B$24>=0
0 $B$25>=0
21 $B$26>=0
0 $B$29=0
0 $C$29=0
0 $D$29=0
0 $E$29=0
0 $F$29=0
0 $G$29=0
0 $B$14>=0
1.5999936 $C$14>=0
2.8 $D$14>=0
1.2 $E$14>=0
1.3999944 $F$14>=0
2.2 $G$14>=0
0 $B$15>=0
1.6000016 $C$15>=0
2.8 $D$15>=0
1.2 $E$15>=0
1.4000014 $F$15>=0
2.2 $G$15>=0
0 $B$16>=0
1.6000016 $C$16>=0
2.8 $D$16>=0
1.2 $E$16>=0
1.4000014 $F$16>=0
2.2 $G$16>=0
0 $B$17>=0
1.6000016 $C$17>=0

$D$17
$E$17
$F$17
$G$17
$B$18
$C$18
$D$18
$E$18
$F$18
$G$18
$H$14:$H$18=Binary

memphis chicago
memphis denver
memphis omaha
memphis portland
cwichita atlanta
cwichita boston
cwichita chicago
cwichita denver
cwichita omaha
cwichita portland

2.8 $D$17>=0
1.2 $E$17>=0
1.4000014 $F$17>=0
2.2 $G$17>=0
10 $B$18>=0
1.6000016 $C$18>=0
2.8 $D$18>=0
1.2 $E$18>=0
1.4000014 $F$18>=0
2.2 $G$18>=0

nts are satisfied.

ward, Require Bounds

%, Assume NonNegative

Integer
Contin
Contin
Contin
Contin
Contin
Contin
Binary
Contin
Contin
Contin
Contin
Contin
Contin
Binary
Contin
Contin
Contin
Contin
Contin
Contin
Binary
Contin
Contin
Contin
Contin

Contin
Contin
Binary
Contin
Contin
Contin
Contin
Contin
Contin
Binary

Status
Binding
Binding
Binding
Binding
Not Binding
Binding
Binding
Binding
Binding
Binding
Binding
Binding
Not Binding
Not Binding
Not Binding
Not Binding
Not Binding
Binding
Not Binding
Not Binding
Not Binding
Not Binding
Not Binding
Binding
Not Binding
Not Binding
Not Binding
Not Binding
Not Binding
Binding
Not Binding

Slack
0
0
0
0
21
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.5999936
2.8
1.2
1.3999944
2.2
0
1.6000016
2.8
1.2
1.4000014
2.2
0
1.6000016
2.8
1.2
1.4000014
2.2
0
1.6000016

Not
Not
Not
Not
Not
Not
Not
Not
Not
Not

Binding
Binding
Binding
Binding
Binding
Binding
Binding
Binding
Binding
Binding

2.8
1.2
1.4000014
2.2
10
1.6000016
2.8
1.2
1.4000014
2.2

inputs-Cost, capacities, demands (for telecom optic)

demand city production and tranportation cost per 1000 units
supply city
atlanta
boston
chicago
denver
omaha
portland
baltimore
1675
400
685
1630
1160
7650
cheyene
1460
1940
970
100
495
1200
salt lake
1925
2499
1425
500
950
800
memphis
380
1355
543
1045
665
2321
cwichita
922
1646
700
508
311
1797
demand
10
8
14
6
7
11
decision variables
supply city
baltimore
cheyene
salt lake
memphis
cwichita

demand city- production alocation

atlanta
boston
chicago
denver
omaha
0
8
2
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
10
0
12
0
0
0
0
0

constraints
suply chain
baltimore
cheyene
salt lake
memphis
cwichita

excess capacity
8
0
0
0
0
atlanta

unmet demand
objective function
cost=

boston
0

47401

chicago
0

denver
0

(1000 units)
portland
0
0
7
11
0
0
0
0
0
0

omaha
0

portland
0

fixed cost ($)

capacity
7650
18
3500
24
5000
27
4100
22
2200
31

000 units)
plants (1=open)
1
1
0
1
0

inputs-Cost, capacities, demands (for telecom optic)

demand city production and tranportation cost per 1000 units
supply city atlanta
boston
chicago
denver
omaha
portland fixed cost (
baltimore
1675
400
685
1630
1160
7650
7650
cheyene
1460
1940
970
100
495
1200
3500
salt lake
1925
2499
1425
500
950
800
5000
memphis
380
1355
543
1045
665
2321
4100
cwichita
922
1646
700
508
311
1797
2200
demand
10
8
14
6
7
11
decision variables
demand city- production alocation (1000 units)
supply cityatlanta
boston
chicago
denver
omaha
portland plants (1=open)
baltimore
0
8
2
0
0
0
1
cheyene
0
0
0
6
7
11
1
salt lake
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
memphis
10
0
12
0
0
0
1
cwichita
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
constraints
suply chainexcess capacity
baltimore
8
cheyene
0
salt lake
0
memphis
0
cwichita
0
atlanta
unmet dem

boston
0

objective function
cost=
47401

chicago
0

denver
0

omaha
0

portland
0

capacity
18
24
27
22
31

lants (1=open)

xij
0
0
0
0
0