TEST PROJECT

MOBILE
ROBOTICS
Competitor Information
Document
WSC2015_TP23_pre_EN

Submitted by:
The Competitor Information Development Team
Members:

Anton van den Brink NL

Paulo Villiger BR
Ulrich Karras DE
Masahiro Itoh JP
Mohammad Al-Shamsi AE
Eric Lo HK
Bob Tone CA

WorldSkills International
Keizersgracht 62-64, 1015 CS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
www.worldskills.org, Tel: +31 23 5311071, Fax: +31 23 5310816
WSC2015

CONTENTS
CONTENTS............................................................................................................. 2
INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... 3
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECTS AND TASKS..................................................................4
THE CUSTOMER SERVICE DEPARTMENT COURT ELEMENTS........................................5
THE COMPETITION PRODUCT..................................................................................7
OVERALL COMPETITOR EVALUATION.......................................................................8
CRITERIA A, B, C AND D EVALUATION CHECK LIST....................................................9
COMPETITOR PRESENTATION GUIDELINE/STRUCTURE.............................................17
ROBOT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION TASKS...........................................................18
EQUIPMENT SAFETY.............................................................................................19
WORLDSKILLS ROBOT COMPONENT COLLECTION...................................................19
INSTRUCTIONS TO COMPETITORS.........................................................................22

INTRODUCTION
The

Customer Service Robot task requires Competitors to:

Design/Fabricate/Manage (Program) a Competitor Built Autonomous Robot capable of compiling

orders in a future MERIAL Customer Service Department

DESCRIPTION OF PROJECTS AND TASKS

Prior to coming to So Paulo Competitors will:
1. Design and Build a Mobile Robot capable of functioning in 100% Autonomous Control Mode
Note:
If a Competitors Robot Design requires Active Robot to Laptop Communication while a Task
Evaluation Run is in progress then it will be a 100% Competitor Responsibility to provide and
manage this process. There will be NO WIFI-support available on the Court.
2. Create a computer based presentation (Power Point) that shows the full extent of their preSao Paulo activities.
Note: Competitor presentations should include:
(a)Images and Minimal Amounts of Text presenting the evolution of their Robot Design
(b)Images and Minimal Amounts of Text presenting their Strategy for completing the Task
(c)Images and Minimal Amounts of Text presenting the Overall Robot Assembly Process
along with details related to specific systems (Electrical/Mechanical/Programming)
(d)Images and Minimal Amounts of Text presenting details related to any Custom Fabricated
Components
(e)Images and Minimal Amounts of Text presenting the Rationale for including components
from outside the WorldSkills Mobile Robot Component Collection
3. Dis-assemble their Robot to component kit level prior to shipping it to So Paulo
Note: Competitors Competition Day One AM Activity will be, within a Maximum of Two Hours, to
re-assemble their Robot and create a set of basic programmes suitable for demonstrating their
Robots Core Performance Capabilities.
Note: Familiarization Day (C-2) can NOT be used to assemble the Mobile Robot. This day is only
intended for Competitors to check whether all components, assembly parts, wires and tools are
available and to check whether individual parts (like motors, sensors, and control unit) are still
functioning after shipping.
4. Competitors will present their made in advance Power Point Presentations on Competition
Day One
Competition Days Two, Three and Four will involve Evaluation Task Runs that will take place on
MERIAL Customer Service Department Courts that provide the following:
(a)Each Court provides Two Side by Side Independent Customer Service Departments
(b)The Product (Eqvalan and UlcerGuard) quantities and placement positions are the same in
BOTH Customer Service Departments
(c)Five to six Teams of Competitors are expected to share the pair of Customer Service
Departments in each court during Work Periods
(d)Teams of Competitors must be prepared to have their Evaluation Task Runs on either the
Left or Right Side of the Customer Service Department Court on which they conduct their
Task Preparation Activities.
(e)There are NO Restrictions on how many Products a Competition Robot may possess at
one time. It is a Competitor Decision how often they will travel to the Product Source
Shelf/Assembly Table.
(f) Robots MUST deliver Complete Customer Orders to the Customer Counter on a Single
Pallet.

THE CUSTOMER SERVICE DEPARTMENT COURT ELEMENTS

The Customer Service Environment Floors will be the DEFAULT competition facility floor (likely
concrete).
Note: The Evaluation Environment presents Multiple Mobility and Object Management Cues.
It is a Competitor Decision to determine which Cues they will utilize when managing their
Autonomous Robot.
Fixed Position Entities: Product Source Shelves, Pallet Stack, Order Assembly Table and
Customer Counter
Tape Lines that are Aligned with the Centre Point of the Entity they are referencing
The Perimeter Court Wall will be 600mm
Tall to enable it to extend 85 mm above
the Top of a ten Product Package on the
Top Shelf of the Product Source Shelf. This
is intended to provide a clean, consistent
back drop for the Product on the Top Shelf.

Barcode 39 Bar Codes printed on 10 by 15

cm Labels

11cm by 11cm Grid

Patterns with the Outer
Ring always White and
the First Inner Ring
always Black to
establish a Consistent
Frame
The Centre 7 by 7
Grids 1cm Squares
can be either Black or White and are used
to generate the Unique Patterns
A Word File Grid_Pattern_Builder has
been provided to enable Competitors to
generate accurate Grid Patterns using
Words Table/Borders and Shading
Properties during their Competition
Preparation
Note: The Grid Patterns and the Bar Codes in
this document and in the Sample Animations
are EXAMPLES ONLY. The Final Competition
Grid Patterns and Bar Codes will be set as
part of the 30% Change immediately prior to
the start of the competition.

Product Source Shelves

Each Customer Service Environment has
its own Product Source Shelf
The product on the shelves includes:
a Single boxes of Eqvalan and UlcerGuard
(g)Three box packages of Eqvalan and
UlcerGuard
(h)Ten box packages of Eqvalan and
UlcerGuard
Note: Package Sets will be bound together
using
Clear Shrink Wrap
The product on the shelves are identified
by:
a Black and White Grid Patterns, and
b 10cm by 15cm Bar Code Labels
Tape Lines on the floor point to the Center of each Single product box or Multiple box
package
Note: If Competitors decide to use Product Photos as a Mobility Management Cue then it is a
Competitor Responsibility to provide their Own Product Photos.
Note: All Teams will be provided with UlcerGuard and Eqvalan samples for use during their
preparation activities.
The Assembly Table/Robot Starting Position
Each Customer Service Environment has its own
Assembly Table
Assembly Tables are positioned along the
Evaluation Environments 20cm tall Centre
Divider
Robots Start of the Task Position will be set in
Sao Paulo during the 30% Change Discussions
immediately prior to the competition
Assembly Tables are identified by Black and
White Grid Patterns and 10cm by 15cm Bar
Codes
Assembly Tables have a Tape Line aligned with
the Table Centre
Assembly Tables provide an Optional Location for
Robots to use when assembling Customer Orders

The Customer Order Pallets

Each Customer Order Department has a Stack of
four Pallets
The Pallet Location is identified by Black and
White Grid Patterns and 10cm by 15cm Bar
Codes and a Tape Line aligned with the Pallet
Stand Centre
Note: The Proposed on the Floor Tape Lines will NOT
be provided IF the nature of the facility floor does
not support positioning them accurately and
securely.
Note: If a floor placement for the Tape Lines is not
possible then Tape Lines will be placed on the Front
Edges of the Shelves and Pallet Stand.

The Customer Order Counter

Each Customer Order Department has its own Customer Order Counter
Each Customer Position along the counter is identified by a Black and White Grid Pattern
and 10cm by
15 cm Bar Code Label
Each Customer Position has a Tape Line pointing to the Centre of the Customer Space

THE COMPETITION PRODUCT

The Competition product is MERIALs UlcerGuard and Eqvalan in:
1 Individual 50 by 50 by 250 mm Boxes weighing approximately 30 grams each
2 Package sets of 3 Boxes 50 by 150 by 250 mm weighing approximately 90 grams each
3 Package sets of 10 Boxes 100 by 250 by 250 mm weighing approximately 300 grams
Note: The Product Packaging does NOT look exactly as shown in these images
UlcerGuard
Eqvalan

OVERALL COMPETITOR EVALUATION

Competitor Evaluation will be based on the Pattern presented in the image below:

The Check List below provides the structure on which Competitors will be evaluated in the
following criteria:

Work Organization Value 10 Marks

Communication and Interpersonal Skills Value 10 Marks
Design Value 25 Marks
Fabrication and Assembly Value 5 Marks

Note:
The Presentation Content Samples presented in the Benchmarks sections below
represent suggested presentation content only and MUST NOT BE INTERPRETED as
setting Minimum Content Guidelines.
Given the 10 minute Presentation Limit and the restricted time likely to be
available for questioning it is expected that NO Team will present all of the
content suggested below.
For Criteria C3 to C8 below Competitors should keep in mind indicators that are aligned to
industry practice, for example, identification of functional requirements/specifications, listing
of brainstormed concepts/ideas, selection of concept/idea, enhancement to chosen
concept/idea, actual design, fabrication, assembly and testing.

CRITERIA A, B, C AND D EVALUATION CHECK LIST

A1

A2

Criteria: Work Organization and

Management Total Value 10 marks
Team Space Condition 1.5 Marks
per Day
Benchmarks:
Workspace management is an ongoing requirement
Workspace Status Evaluations will
be conducted at Random Times
throughout the 4 Competition
Days
Robots must be secured/mounted
on a stand to ensure that if a robot
drive system unexpectedly
engages the robot cannot drive
OFF the workbench
Safety and Efficiency are the
primary goals of workspace
management and the placement
of tools, materials will be viewed
from the perspective of whether or
not they are contributing to a safe
and efficient workspace
Examples:
no tools or waste on the floor
cables are not allowed to be
spanned over walkways
food/drinks only in closed
bottles/boxes while working IF
the Expert Jury Panel decides
these items will be allowed in
the workspaces
tools with blades must have
their blades protected when not
in use
tools should be mainly in their
boxes
Competitors have to wear
protective clothes according to
the WS Health, Safety and
Environment policy and
regulations. NOTE: The Expert
Jury Panel will provide
Competitors, during their in Sao
Paulo Briefings, with the
specific requirements for when
the wearing of protective
glasses/gloves will be required
Arrival On Time and Fully Prepared in
the Shared

Acceptable

Not acceptable

B1

B2

Group and at their Assigned

Competitor Court
Spaces 1.0 Marks per Day
Benchmarks:
Time management is an on-going
requirement
Competitor adherence to set
schedules regarding when and
where they should be will be
monitored during all competition
days
Examples:
Always on time = Acceptable
Late by more than 1 minute =
Unacceptable
Criteria: Communication and
Interpersonal Skills Total Value 10
Marks
Co-operative Behaviour with
Opponents in the Shared
Competition Court Space 1.5 Marks
per Day
Benchmarks:
Space and Time Restrictions in the
competition space will be tight
Competitor Interactions with their
Opponents will be observed
throughout the competition period
with respect to their contributing
to creating a fair and equitable
access to shared spaces for all
participants
Examples:
Note: Competitors may arrive late
to or even choose to skip an
Assigned to the Team Shared
Court Robot Preparation Time
Competitors still in the Shared
Court Space 30 seconds after
their Team Shared Court Robot
Preparation Time has ended =
Unacceptable
Co-operative Behaviour with their
Compatriot Team
Member 0.5 Marks per Day
Benchmarks:
WSI Mobile Robotics is a Team
Competition
Competitor Interactions with their
Compatriot will be observed
throughout the competition period
It is expected both competitors
will be making strong

Acceptable

Not acceptable

B3

C1

contributions to addressing the

competition requirements
Examples:
Both Competitors actively
contributing to the Teams
performance = Acceptable
One Competitor observed to be
leaving the clear bulk of the
work to their partner =
Unacceptable
Co-operative Behaviour with Experts
0.5 Marks per Day
Benchmarks:
Competitor Interactions with
the Experts managing the
competition experience will be
observed throughout the
competition period
It is expected Competitors
interactions with Experts will be
conducted in a respectful
manner
Criteria: Design Total Value 25
Marks
The Competitors Prepared In advance
Power Point Presentation will be the
Primary Evaluation Vehicle for the
Design Criteria
Identification of the Robot Mobility
Base Unit requirements needed to
address the Clients needs 3 Marks
Benchmark:
Identification of all essential
destination locations within the
Evaluation Environment
Identification of the environmental
features defining destination
locations within the evaluation
environment
Identification of the Mobility
Management Utilities
(Sensor/Other) used to support
Robot Movement Management
Explain and reason why the robot
can move to all essential
locations within the Evaluation
Environment
Explain and reason (using different
sensors) why the robot can detect
all essential locations with
needed accuracy

Acceptable

Not acceptable

C2

C3

C4

Identification of the Object

Management System (OMS)
requirements needed to address the
Clients needs 3 Marks
Benchmarks:
Identification of the Target Object
Characteristics
Identification of the Target Object
starting and ending location
characteristics
Identification of the Target Object
Management Systems Movement
Characteristics (Degrees of
Freedom)
Identification of the Object Gripper
Details, Core Function Pattern /
Specific Gripper Management
(Sensors / Other)
Explanation of the Strategy they
have selected to meet the Clients
Needs 3 Marks
Benchmarks:
Presentation of their overall
strategy for dealing with Customer
Orders of all types
Presentation of the Evolution of their
Overall Robot Base Unit Design 3
Marks
Benchmarks:
A sequential display of the
concept development from initial
sketches through to final test
videos
Visualize the electric circuit for the
Emergency Stop on the robot
Visualize the interface structure
between PC programming
environment and robot controller
Visualize the interface structure of
sensor signal and robot controller

C5

C6

C7

Presentation of the Evolution of their

Overall Object Management System
Design 3 Marks
Benchmarks:
A sequential display of the
concept development from initial
sketches through to final test
videos
Explain and demonstrate the
programming language structure
Demonstration of motor control
function
Demonstration of Cartesian
movement functions
Demonstration of navigation
functions
Demonstrate how to use the
available sensors in the software
Demonstrate how to operate the
OMS in the software
Demonstrate how to download a
programme into the controller
Presentation of the
Electrical/Electronic Systems of their
Robot and Object Management
Systems 3 Marks
Benchmarks:
A sequential display of the
concept development from initial
sketches through to final test
videos
Presentation of the Mechanical
Systems of their Robot and Object
Management Systems 3 Marks
Benchmarks:
A sequential display of the
concept development from initial
sketches through to final test
videos

C8

Presentation through a Video Clip of

their Robot/Object Management
Systems Performance Capabilities
demonstrated at home during their
WSC2015 Competition Preparation
Activities 4 Marks
Benchmarks:
A video displaying of the
completion of task samples at all
three task levels
Acceptable: The video shows at
least:
robot drives forward and
backwards at least 2m
robot turns left and right
robot picks up a box from
shelves with at least two
different heights
robot picks up a pallet from the
floor and puts it on a table
robot shows signal light while
driving
Competitor demonstrates
function of emergency-stopbutton.
filming directions support the
recognition of the above
video lasts no more than 5
minutes, therefore speeding up
the video during monotonic
robot movements is allowed
video has enough quality
(enough light, nearly no
shaking, resolution at least
480p)
A video of a complete test run
is NOT necessary for an
acceptable rating
Criteria: Fabrication & Assembly
Total Value 5 Marks

Acceptable

Not
Acceptable

D1

D2

Frame Assembly meets Industry

Standards for fit and alignment of
components 1 Mark
Benchmarks:
Examination of the Robot
Frames Structural Integrity (fit
between connected
components, accuracy of
component alignment angles,
sizes etc.)
Construction drawing with all
measures and tolerances
Verification of measures and
tolerances
Object Management System meets
Industry Standards for fit and
alignment of components 1 Mark
Benchmarks:
Examination of the Object
Management Systems
Structural Integrity (fit between
connected components,
accuracy of component
alignment angles, sizes etc.)
Construction drawing with all
measures and tolerances
Verification of measures and
tolerances

D3

Wiring installation meets Industry

Standards for secure/safe
installation 1 Mark
Benchmarks:
Examination of the Robots
Wiring (secure wire placement,
efficient wire organization,
inclusion of appropriate fusing
and master safety switch)
Examples:

D4

Acceptable: all wires are

fixed to the chassis (for
example with cable binders).
There is special protection
for wires applied where they
have to go over metal edges
(paddings or guiding rails
or...).
Wires cross each other only
when necessary.
For every connector a strain
relief must be considered
(maybe small extra wire
loops in front of the
connectors)
Base Unit Core Mobility
Demonstration 1 Mark:
Acceptable:
Robot drives 1m forward on a
line (+/- 5% or 10% difference
to end position in any direction
is tolerated)
Robot drives backwards to start
position (+/- 5% or 10%
difference to end position in
any direction is tolerated)
Robot is back in start position:
robot turns left to a position 90
degrees from starting position.
It has not to stay in place,
because maybe a team chooses
a steering-mechanism which
can't turn in place (+/- 10
tolerance)
Robot turns right to a position
180 degrees from last position
(+/- 10 tolerance) 1 Mark

D5

Object Management System Core

Functionality Demonstration
involving Reaching Out/Taking
Possession of a Target
Object/Releasing the Target Object
onto the Floor/Returning the Object
Management System to its Starting
Configuration 1 Mark
Acceptable:
Robot can pick up one box
(Competitor can choose which
one single/3-pack/10-pack)
from the assembling table and
can put it back. No need for
accurate positioning.

COMPETITOR PRESENTATION
GUIDELINE/STRUCTURE
Competitor Presentations must adhere to the following guideline/structure:
(i) All Competitor Presentations will be submitted in Power Point file format
(j) All Competitor Presentations will be linked together in a master Auto-play file to support
All Competitor Presentations being played on a continuous basis on screens in the
Mobile Robotics Competition Space.
(k)All Competitor Presentations will adhere to a Maximum Run Time of ten Minutes on
Auto Play.
(l) Competitors will set the Per Slide Display Time that will apply to their presentation
when it is in Auto-play Mode along with the Slide to Slide Transition Format.
(m) All Competitor Presentations should Maximize the use of pictures/video clips
(n)All Competitor Presentations MUST include the videos confirming their Robots Mobility
and Object Management Capabilities as demonstrated at home during their
Competition Preparation Experiences.
(o)All Competitor Presentations should utilize a Minimum Amount of Text.
(p)When Text is included in a slide it must be displayed in either English only or English
and the Competitors Native Language.
The Competitor Presentation should identify the Team/Country either in a Title Page only and
in an on all slides Header/Footer.
Competitor Presentations and Robot Assembly will be evaluated on Competition Day One.
1 Presentation files must adhere to the maximum 10 minutes run time in auto-play format
when being presented to the general competition visitors
5. When competitors are making their presentation to the evaluation panel they will be
allocated a minimum 20 minute time block. If scheduling constraints permit an allocation
of 30 minutes will be the maximum time block provided per team. The questioning
process may involve a translator.
6. During their presentation to the evaluation panel the Competitors will have to run their
presentation continuously and take questions at the end of the presentation.
Work Organization and Management along with Communication and Interpersonal Skills will
be evaluated on an on-going basis over the 4 Competition Days.
Robot Performance will generate 50 Marks in the following two Evaluation Criteria:
Programming Testing and Adjustment 20 Marks
Performance Review and Commission 30 Marks
Robot Performance Evaluation Tasks will take place on Competition Days 2, 3 and 4.

ROBOT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION TASKS

NOTE: The Customer Orders above are SAMPLES ONLY

1 All Evaluation Task Runs will require the Robot to assemble (Place the Requested
Product(s) on a Pallet) and deliver the Customer Order(s) to the Correct Customer Space
along the Customer Counter.
2 The sequence Customer Orders are delivered to the Customer Counter is a Competitor
Decision.
Example: Deliver to Customer B first then to Customer A and Customer C or Deliver to
Customer C first then to Customer B and Customer A
3 Marking will be conducted AFTER the Evaluation Task Run has been completed.
4 Evaluation Task Run Marking involves two items:
(a)Has the correct order been delivered to the correct customer?
(b)How long did the Order Processing take?
7. The total marks per Task Evaluation Run will be determined based on:
a The Task Run Level (one item orders / two item orders / three item orders)
b The Number of Task Evaluation Runs at each level
c All Task Evaluation Runs will involve serving three customers
8. The marks distribution within a single Task Evaluation Run will be distributed as follows:
a 25% awarded if Customer Ones Order is correctly delivered independent of time taken
to deliver the order
(a)25% awarded if Customer Twos Order is correctly delivered independent of time taken
to deliver the order
(b)25% awarded if Customer Threes Order is correctly delivered independent of time
taken to deliver the order
9. 25% assigned for Time Taken and awarded on the following basis:
(a)Awarded ONLY IF ALL Three Customer Orders have been correctly delivered
(b)Mark calculated based on the following formula: Team Time / Fastest Qualifying Team
Time (0.25 X Total Available Single Evaluation Task Run Value) = Time Mark Awarded
The Single Task Evaluation Run Values will be set when the Task Evaluation Run Schedule and
the number of Task Evaluation Runs expected per team per level are known.
The Marks Value per level will award different per Task Evaluation Run Marks for each Task
Level to reflect the escalating difficulty involved as you move from sets of one item to two
item to three item orders.
Note: An Evaluation Task Run will be considered ended when the Robot Object Management
System has moved completely clear of the Third Pallet on the Customer Counter.
Note: Competitors will be provided a 15 minute Time Block to Finalize their Robot
Preparation and conduct an Evaluated Task Run but Competitors can only use a Maximum of
10 minutes for their actual Evaluated Task Run.
Note: A Robot MUST have a Safety Light on the Robot that indicates the Robot is moving.
This light is expected to be ON when the Robot is moving and OFF when the Robot is
stationary.
Note: The functionality of the Safety Light will be evaluated during the Robot Assembly
Inspection/Basic Core Performance Demonstration (Move Forward/Backward/Turn Left/Turn
Right/Primary Object Management System Functionality Features)

EQUIPMENT SAFETY
All Robot and Object Management System Circuits must meet Industry Safety Standards.
Appropriate fusing for Electrical Circuits.
An Easily Accessible Master Shut-Off Switch for use in the event of a Major Robot
Malfunction.
Note: ALL Competitor Provided Equipment MUST be Inspected, Certified and Approved by
WSI-Brazil BEFORE their use will be permitted.

WORLDSKILLS ROBOT COMPONENT COLLECTION

The WorldSkills Robot Component Collection will be provided to ALL participating National
Teams with delivery expected to be completed by the end of December, 2014.
A detailed component list will be available at the beginning of November, 2014.
Competitors are expected to utilize the provided equipment when building their robot.
Examples:
The Primary Drive Motors included in the WSI Components Collection cannot be replaced
with more powerful motors.
Competitors are restricted to using the sensors and other information gathering hardware
provided in the WSI Components Collection and cannot purchase / use additional sensors /
information gathering hardware.
In March, 2015 after all Experts and Competitors have had direct experience with the WSI
Component Collection a Mobile Robotics Forum Discussion/vote will set the degree of robot
dis-assembly required prior to coming to So Paulo.
The list below provides a Description of what the WorldSkills Robot Component Collection will
include. A web based source will be created to provide all competitors with equal access to
technical information related to the components. Teams are restricted to using these
components exclusively to build their competition robots. Competitors cannot add any
additional electrical/pneumatic components, motors, sensors, gears, wheels or other
performance specific components when building their robot. Competitors may add additional
frame / structural components.
Description

Qt
y

Brackets and Structural Components

Aluminium Channel 38 X 38 with hub
pattern (460 mm Length)
Aluminium Channel 38 X 38 with hub
pattern (300 mm Length)
Aluminium Channel 38 X 38 with hub
pattern (150 mm Length)
Aluminium Channel 38 X 38 with hub
pattern(115 mm Length)
Aluminium Channel 38 X 38 with hub
pattern(38 mm Length)
90 Degree Single Angle Channel Bracket

90 Degree Hub Mount

Channel Bracket A

Channel Connector Plate (Package of 2)

90 degree Angle Bracket

Aluminium Flat Bracket 100 mm Length

4
2
2
4
8

Comments

INSTRUCTIONS TO COMPETITORS
1 Competitors will be assigned an Exclusive Use Work Space where they will conduct ALL of
their Robot Assembly / Programming Activities.
2 Competitors will be assigned an Evaluation Court and will use this court space for ALL of
their Robot Preparation Activities and for their Performance Evaluation Experiences.
3 Competitors may use Two Computers in their Work Space but they can bring ONLY ONE
computer to their assigned Evaluation Court.
4 Competitors must ensure their Object Management System does NOT damage the Product
Boxes.
Note: Each Evaluation Court will have a Right and Left Side MERIAL 20?? Customer Service
Department.
Competitors MUST be prepared to have their Robot run Marked Task Evaluation Experiences
on either the Right or the Left MERIAL 20?? Customer Service Department.
The Right and Left MERIAL 20?? Customer Service Department Layouts have been
configured to support NO need to alter Competitors Programs based on whether they are on
the Left or the Right court space.
Competitors are expected to demonstrate True Fair Play and Co-operation at all times but
most particularly when they are sharing the court spaces during the Work Periods.
Competitors are responsible to bring to the competition site and to use exclusively during the
competition the Robot they have Designed and Built.
Competitors are expected to bring ALL of their Competition Equipment in a container no
larger than One Cubic Meter.