Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dayalpur (Faridabad)
PROJECT REPORT
SUBMITTED AS PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE
REQUIREMENT FOR THE PCBSC NURSING AFFILIATED TO
PANDIT DAYAL SHARMA UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH
SCIENCES IN ROHTAK
Miss.Shaka Rani
Signature
of the Candidates
Miss.Usha
Rani
Miss.Susheela Devi
Miss. Meenakshi
Meenakshi,
Miss.Renu,
Mr.
Vinaya
Chandran
In
partial
Date:
Place :
Signature of the Guide
Ms. Sonia John
Department of Mental Health
Nursing.
Date:
Place :
Date:
Place :
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
O Give thanks to the Lord for He is good!
For His mercy endures forever
- Psalms 107:1
We
would
like
to
convey our
heartful
gratitude
to
Sujith
We thank to our staff who had been with us & being with us & who
had been the source of inspiration throughout this course of study
RESEARCH ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES
To
assess
the
existing
knowledge
level
of
diabetic
patients
on
demographic variables.
To develop an infoamtion Booklet on management of Diabetes Mellitus
BACKGROUND
Diabetes is a major health problems being faced by modern society of
today all over the world and India is predicted to have the most number of
people with Diabetes Mellitus by the year 2015. Once one
has develop
Diabetes, it cannot be cured but fortunately enough can be managed very well
and quality of life can be improved under wellness programme involving diet,
exercise, and medicine.
METHODS
The study was conducted in the month of May 2013 at selected hospital in
Faridabad. an administrative approval was obtained from concerned authority
in Faridabad.
RESULTS
The result indicate that majority of the respondents (32.5%) were between 4150 years of age group. Majority of respondents (70%) were male. Majority of
respondents (57.5%) were belong to Hindu religion. Majority of respondents
(50%) were belongs to joint family. Majority of respondents (65%) were married.
35% of respondents were educated upto high school. Majority of respondents
(35%) are private employee. Majority of the respondents (52.5%) has a history
of Diabetic Mellitus. Majority of the respondents (40%) were received
information from electronic media. Among the sample 29 (72.5%) had
inadequate knowledge, 9 (22.5%) had moderately adequate knowledge and 2
(5%) had adequate knowledge. Demographic variable such as age, sex, religion
type of family, marital status, monthly income of the family, source of
information were found to be non significant at 0.05 level.
Demographic
The study reflects that there is lack of knowledge even in the educated
population. So thereby, an information Booklet is developed on management of
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER NO.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
TITLE
INTRODUCTION
OBJECTIVES
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
METHODOLOGY
DATA ANALYSIS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
SUMMERY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
ANNEXURES
PAGE NO.
1-4
5-10
11-16
17-24
25-54
55-57
58-60
61-63
64-66
67-91
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE
NO.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Diabetes Mellitus
Classification of Respondents by source of
47
11
information
Frequency and percentage distribution of
49
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
of
Respondents
Respondents
Respondents
Respondents
Respondents
Respondents
Respondents
Respondents
Respondents
by
by
by
by
by
by
by
by
by
age group
sex
religion
type of family
marital status
educational status
occupation
monthly income
family history of
PAGE NO.
29
31
33
35
37
39
41
43
45
51
13.
52-53
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE
NO.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
FIGURES
PAGE NO.
10
18
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
44
11
the family
Classification of Respondents by family history of
46
12
Diabetes Mellitus
Classification of Respondents by source of
48
13.
information
Frequency and percentage distribution of
50
LIST OF ANNEXURES
SL NO.
TITLE
1
Certificate of content validity
2
Lists of experts consulted for the content
PAGE NO.
67
68
69-90
91
INTRODUCTION
The word Diabetes was coined by Aretacus of separated. The word taken from Greek
diabainein, and literally means passing through or Siphon, a reference to one of
diabetes major symptoms of excessive urine discharge. The word became diabetes
from the English adoption of the medieval Latin diabetes. In 1965 Thomas Willis added
Mellitus to the name (Greek mel-honey) when he noted that a diabetics urine and
blood has a sweet taste. In 1776it was confirmed the sweet taste was because of an
excess of sugar in the blood. The ancient Chinese tested for Diabetes by observing
whether ants were attracted to a person is urine and called the ailment Sweet urine
disease
in
clinical
practice
in
Indian
context,
increasing
urbanization,
Medical management for clients with Diabetes Mellitus includes restoring and
maintaining blood glucose levels to as near normal as possible by balancing diet,
exercise and the use of oral hypoglycemic agents or insulin in general, when Diabetes
Mellitus is successfully managed clients avoid the complication of hypoglycemia and
hyperglycemia.
Initial as well as ongoing client education is vital in helping the client manage
this chronic condition. Interventions must be individualized to the clients goals, age,
life. Style, nutritional needs, malnutrition activity level, occupation, type of Diabetes
Mellitus and ability to independently perform the skills required by the management
plan.
1.
W.H.O:-
The world health organization (WHO) has estimated that there will be 350
million people with Diabetes is the world by 2012. WHO develop a program for
worldwide Diabetes Mellitus is increasing rapidly in China and India and other
countries, where the standard of living is increasing in association with their increase
in obesity. Diabetes Mellitus increasing not only in the Western world as it has been for
many years, but also in Mid Eastern countries for reasons there are unclear.
WORLDWIDE:-
0.6 million males and 0.54 million females with diagnosed Diabetes in enlarged
and Wales in 2008, and over half (60 and 53% respectively) where aged 50-74 years.
Because the population in ageing the members male and females with diagnosed.
Diabetes is projected to use to 0.84 million (37%) and 0.67 million (24%) respectively,
in specific prevalence. From 2004-2008 the increases were 24% in 0-24 years old
males, 18% in 24-29 years old men, 15% in 50-74 years old men and 14% in men
aged 75 years. In female, the increases were 17, 2018 and 12% respectively, if
prevalence increase by 10% from 2008-2023, the number of males with the diagnosis
is projected to rise by 36% to 0.74 million, given a 20% increase prevalence, the
number of female is projected to rise to 1.9 million (78% increase) and 8.7 million
(67% increase) respectively in 2013.
2.
According to International Diabetes Federation (IDF) estimated that in 2010,
the five countries with the largest number of people with diabetic are India,
China the United States, Russia and Brazil. The IDF also reported that in
2010, the five countries with the highest Diabetes prevalence in the adult
population all Norway, the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Bahrain. Low and middle
income countries for the greatest burden of Diabetes.
According to ADA and CDC, total ADC 23.8 million (7.8%, CDC 24 (8%).
Undiagnosed 5.7 million, Pre Diabetes 57 million, New case per years 1.6
million is previous over 20 years of age. Prevalence under 20 years age-186,000
or 0.22%. This equals about in every 400-600 children with Diabetes Mellitus.
Prevalence in person aged 20 years and older 23.5 million (or) 10.7% of all
people in this age group. Prevalence in person aged 20 years and older 12.2
million (or) 23.1% of all people in this group. Prevalence in men aged 20 years
and older 12 million (or) 11.2% prevalence in women age 20 years and older
11.5 million or 10.2% Non-Hispanic white 14.9 million (or) 19.8% NonHispanic blacks 3.7 million or 14% of this group. American Indians and
Alaskan natives 14.2%
Adjusted for age over 20 years for patient of the Indian Health service
16.5% (Total), 60% (Alaskan) and 29.3% (Southern) (Arizona) of these
population have Diabetes. Adjusting again for age 20 (or) above 6.6% of nonHispanic whites 7.5% of Asian Americans. 10.4% of Hispanics and 11.8% of
non-Hispanic blacks have Diabetes Mellitus.
population based study conducted in sic large cities from different region of
India, the prevalence was the highest in Hyderabad (16.6%) followed by
Chennai (13.5%), Bangalore (12.4%) Kolkatta (11.7%), New Delhi (11.6%) and
Mumbai (9.3%) A recent study from rural Maharastra showed a high prevalence
of 4.3%. The prevalence of self reported Diabetes was 5.6& in this study
population.
4.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVES
OPERATIONAL DEFINITIONS
Assessment
:- It
refers
to
management
knowledge
of
Diabetes
of
diabetic
patient
by
using
refers
to
on
structured
questionnaire.
Knowledge
:- In
this
study
knowledge
the
level
of
Diabetes Mellitus.
5.
Diabetic patients
Information
Booklet
ASSUMPTION:
HYPOTHESIS:
DELIMITATION
6.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
A conceptual framework is a group of concepts and a set of proportions
that spell out the relationship between them.
Conceptual framework deals with abstractions (concepts) that are
assembled by virtue of their relevance to a common theme. Conceptual
framework play several inter-related roles in the process of science. It serves as
a spring board for the generation of researcher hypothesis and can provide and
important context for scientific research.
It is the process of mixing from an abstract idea to a concrete proposal.
It helps investigator to organize their thinking observation interpretation and
goal direction.
The conceptual framework represents a less formal attempt of organizing
a phenomena. Conceptual models deals with concepts that are used as
building blocks and provide a conceptual perspective regarding inter-related
phenomena which are closely structured.
A conceptual frame work is a network of intra-related concepts that
provide a structure for organizing and describing the phenomenon of interest
research studies are based on a theoretical conceptual framework that facilities
to visualizing the problem and places the variable in a logical context.
BEHAVOIUR OUTCOME:It refers toward attaining positive health outcome for the old age people
those who are effected Diabetic Mellitus. The investigator has modified the
health promotional model for the present study.
8.
BEHAVIOUR OUTCOME :-
9.
10.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
I. STUDIES RELATED TO DIABETES MELLITUS:A study was conducted on life style risk factors and new onset Diabetes
Mellitus in adults. The objective of the study was to determine how life style
factors assessed in combination, relate to new-onset Diabetes in a broad and
relatively unselected population of adults. The sample include low risk life style
group were defined by physical activity level above the median, dietary score
(higher fiber intake and poly unsaturated to saturated fat ratio, lower trans-felt
intake and lower mean glycemic index) in the top 2 quintiles, never smoked or
farmer smoker more than 20 years ago or far fewer than 5 pack years; alcohol
use; body mass index less than 25 and waist circumference of 88cm for women
or 92cm for men. The finding shows that during 34539 person years, 337 new
cases of drug treated Diabetes Mellitus occurred (9.8 per 100 person years).
After adjustment for age, sex, race, education level, and annual income, each
life style factor was independently associated with incident Diabetes over all the
rate of incident Diabetes was 35% lower (relative risk, 0.65; 95% confidence
interval 0.59, 0.71) for each 1 additional life style factor in the low risk group.
11.
A study was conducted on Diabetes risk factors Diabetes and Diabetes care,
across sectional mail study. Self completed survey and retrospective chart
review were used the objective of the study was to comprehensively describe
Diabetes-related risk factors and quality of care. The sample include ninety
seven patients with Diabetes and 495 with other diseases. In the mail study 84
with Diabetes in the self completed survey and 101 diabetic patient chart
reviews. The finding showed that most residents without Diabetes had recently
had their blood pressure and cholesterol checked 60.4% were trying to control
their weight and 73.9% were exercise regularly. Those with Diabetes reported a
greater uptake of healthy living messages and had a mean HbAIC of 7.3% total
cholesterol of 5.0 mmol L(-1):12.9% had a diastolic blood pressure greater than
or equal to 85 mmHg foot checks were infrequent (18%)
II. STUDIES
RELATED
TO
KNOWLEDGE
OF
DIABETIC
PATIENTS
corresponding cities triggered patients to contact the study nurse and reduce
activity until temperature normalized the findings show that enhanced therapy
group had fewer foot ulcers than the standard therapy and structured foot
examination groups (enhanced therapy 8.5 Vs standard therapy 29.3%,
P=0.0046 and enhanced therapy Vs structured foot examination groups were
4.37 and 4.71 times more likely to develop ulcer than patients in the enhanced
therapy group14.
A study was conducted on quality evidence for life style management and
glycemic control in adults. A quasi experimental study was used to evaluating
life style (diet and or physical activity) modification and life style control date
13.
source included bibliographic data base, manual reference search and contract
with study others. The kindly show that search strategy generated 4,572
citations. The majority of citations were not relevant to the study objective in
this retrospective study morbidity obese with Diabetes Mellitus treated with a
very low carbohydrate diet15.
A study was conducted on beliefs and practices among people with Diabetes
Mellitus. A structures question knowledge, beliefs and practices regarding
Diabetes was administered to 199 persons with Diabetes (92.5%) mean age
(SD) was 53 (11) years. Mean deviation of Diabetes (SD) was 8 (7) years in men
and 9 (6) years in women men had a significantly better knowledge score that
women (P=0.02) there was no significant difference in the beliefs an practices
scores. Score were classed as good (60%) in only 13.6% of participants for
knowledge, 17.6%.
14.
more than 70% total mortality among patients with type 2 Diabetes. The
association of physical activity physical fitness, and changes in the life style
with the risk of type 2 Diabetes has been assessed by number of prospective
studies and clinical trials in the past decade. Several studies have also
evaluated the joint associations of physical activity, body mass index and
glucose levels with the risk of type 2 Diabetes these studies showed that
moderate or high levels of physical activity or physical fitness and changes in
the life style can prevent type 2 Diabetes18.
20
15.
A study was conducted on exercise prescription. For patients with diabetes and
pre-diabetes. Diabetes Mellitus and pre-diabetic conditions such as impaired
fasting glucose and impaired glucose-tolerance (Igt) are rapidly increasing in
prevalence exercise training often in combination with other life style
strategies as beneficial effect on preventing concept of Diabetes and improve
glycemic control in those with pre-diabetes in addition exercise training
improve cardiovascular risk profile, body composition and cardio-respiratory
fitness, all strongly related to better health outcomes based on the evidence it
16.
METHODOLOGY
methodology and procedure adopted by the researcher for the conduction of the
study. It presents in detail about the research approach, research design, the
settling, population, sample and sampling technique, instrument used for data
collection, data collection procedure and plan for data analysis.
RESEARCH APPROACH:-
The research approach indicates the procedure for conducting the study.
It guides the researcher what to research, whom to analyse and interpret the
results in view of the nature of the problem selected for the study and the
objectives to be accomplished a descriptive research approach was considered
as appropriate for the study.
RESEARCH DESIGN:-
Research design refers to the researchers over the plan for obtaining
answers to the research questions and it spells out the strategies that the
researcher adopt to develop information that is accurate, and interpretable. The
present study assess the knowledge on management of Diabetes Mellitus
among diabetic patients. Research design selected for the study was descriptive
design.
17.
DEMOGRAPHIC VARIABLES :
Demographic
variables
under
the
study
are
age,
sex,
religion,
The setting is the location where the study is conducted. The current study was
conducted in Apoorva Hospital Faridabad.
SAMPLE : -
SAMPLING TECHNIQUE:-
19.
SAMPLING CRITERIA :-
1. Inclusive criteria :
1. The patients who are diagnosed as either type I or type II Diabetes
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Mellitus
Patient age group between 35-55 years
Those who are willing to participate in the study.
Patients who are available at the period of study
Patients who can read and write English & Hindi
Patients of both gender.
20.
DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENTS:The tool is divided into section I and II
Socio demographic data contain 10 items on age, sex, religion, type of family,
marital status, educational status, occupational status, income, family history
of Diabetes Mellitus and source of information on knowledge regarding
management of Diabetes Mellitus.
Section II :-
Diet
Medication
Exercise
Foot care
Complication
For each questionnaire four opinion were given and only one correct answer, for
each correct answer, the score was 1. If answer was wrong the score was given
as o. the highest score was 35.
21.
Content Validity
PILOT STUDY :
Pilot study is the trail run of the methodology planned for the major project,
the purpose of the study is two fold, to make improvement in the research
projects and to detect problems that must be solved before the major study is
attempted.
22.
The purpose of pilot study was as follows:-
purposive sampling technique. Subject for they were selected for the pilot study
by purposive sampling technique. Subject for the pilot study possessed the
same characteristics as that of samples for main study. After the data
collection, the data were analyzed and it was found feasible to conduct main
study.
hospital, Medical Surgical department. The data collection was done in month
of March 2013 and data collected from 35 patients with diabetes mellitus. The
objective and nature of the study was explained to the patients. Confidentiality
was assured to all the patients to get their co-operation through the process of
data collection. A questionnaire was administered which is compressed of two
sections. Demographic variables and standardized tool for assessing the
knowledge regarding management of Diabetes mellitus among diabetic patients.
Section III : Association between knowledge score and selected base line
variables.
CONCLUSION :-
This chapter gives a brief description of the methodology adopted for the study
which includes the research approach, design, setting, population, sample
sampling
24.
DATA ANALYSIS
Statistical Analysis is a method of rendering quantities information
meaning and intelligently statistical procedure enable the researcher to reduce
summarize, evaluate, interpret and communicate numeric information.
The data was collected from the respondents before giving information
booklet. The collected information was organized, tabulated, analyzed and
interpreted using descriptive and inferential statistics. Analysis was
done
25.
PRESENTATION OF THE DATA:-
To begin with the data were entering in master data sheet tabulation
and
stoical processing. The data are analyzing and interpreting using descriptive
and inferential statistics. The data were presented on following headings.
26.
Characteristic
Category
s
Age
30-40 years
10
25
41 50 years
13
32.5
51-60 years
12
30
Sex
61 & above
Male
5
28
12.5
70
Religion
Female
Hindu
12
23
30
57.5
Muslim
12
30
Christian
12.5
Others
Nuclear
0
18
0
45
Joint
20
Extent
Married
2
26
5
65
Unmarried
20
Widow/Widower
10
Educational
Divorce/Separated
Primary
2
10
5
25
Status
Secondary
12
30
High School
14
25
P.U.C
2
3.
4.
5.
6.
Type of family
Marital Status
7.
8.
Occupation
House wife
10
25
Private employee
14
35
Self employee
13
32.5
Retired
7.5
Monthly Income
27.
Rs.1000
12.5
of the family
Rs.1000 2000
10
25
Rs.2001-3000
10
25
15
21
37.5
52.5
Family history
Rs.>3000
Yes
10
of D.M
Source if
No.
Electronic media
19
6
47.5
40
information
Printed media
10
Health professional
10
25
Family members /
10
25
relatives / friends
28.
Sl No
1
2
3
4
Age Group
30-40 years
41 50 years
53-60 years
61 & above
Total
N=40
F
10
13
12
5
40
%
25
3.2.5
30
12.5
100
Table 1 (1) indicates the majority of subject belongs to 41-51 years that is
about 32.5% of subject in this study
29.
30.
Table 1 (b)
Sl No
1
2
Religion
Male
Female
Total
N=40
Frequency
28
12
40
Percentage
70
30
100
31.
32.
Table 1 I
Sl No
1
2
3
4
N=40
Religion
Hindu
Muslim
Christian
Others
Total
Frequency
23
12
5
0
40
Percentage
57.5
30
12.5
0
100
33.
34.
Table 1 (d)
Sl No
1
2
3
Religion
Nuclear
Joint
Extend
Total
N=40
Frequency
18
20
2
40
Percentage
45
50
5
100
35.
36.
Table 1 (e)
Sl No
1
2
3
4
Type of family
Married
Unmarried
Widow/Widower
Divorce/Separated
Total
N=40
Frequency
26
2
8
4
40
Percentage
65%
5%
20%
10%
100
37.
38.
Table I (f)
N=40
Sl No
Educational
Frequency
Percentage
1
2
3
4
5
Status
Primary
Secondary
High School
PUC
Graduate & above
Total
10
12
14
2
2
40
25
30
35
5
5
100
39.
40.
Table I (g)
N=40
Sl No
Educational
Frequency
Percentage
1
2
3
4
Status
House wife
Primary Employee
Self Employee
Retired
Total
10
14
13
3
40
2.5
42.5
32.5
7.5
100
41.
42.
44.
Table I (i)
Sl.
No.
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Mellitus
Yes
21
52.5
No
19
47.5
Total
40
100
45.
46.
Table I (j)
Sl.
Source of information
Frequency
Percentage(%)
16
40
10
10
25
relatives/
10
25
Total :
40
100
No.
1
Electronics media
Printed media
Health professional
Family
members
friends
47.
48.
SECTION II
FREQUENCY AND PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF
RESPONDENTS ACCORDING TO PRE TEST KNOWLEDGE
LEVEL OF MANAGEMENT OF DIABETES MELLITUS
Respondents
Knowledge level
Category
Number
Percentage(%)
Adequate
>75%
51-75%
22.9
<50%
29
72.5
Total
40
100
Knowledge
Moderate
Knowledge
Inadequate
Knowledge
CONCLUSION
The above table shows the majority of respondents (72.5%) had
inadequate knowledge, 9 respondents (22.5%) had moderate knowledge,
and 2 respondents (5%) had adequate knowledge in pre test knowledge
level on management of Diabetes Mellitus.
50.
SECTION-III
Classification o respondents on diet, medication exercise and
complications.
N-40
Respondents knowledge(%)
S.No.
Knowledge
Statements
Mean
Mean %
S.D.
Aspects
1
Diet
2.52
36
15.57
Medication
10
2.48
24.8
15.26
Exercise
0.75
18.75
4.62
Foot care
10
2.48
24.8
15.26
Complication
0.75
18.75
4.62
51.
SECTION IV
DATA ON ASSOCIATION OF KNOWLEDGE ON MANAGEMENT OF DIABETES MELLITUS
AMONG DIABETIC PATIENTS WITH THEIR SELECTED DEMOGRAPHIC VARIABLES
SL
.
N
O
DEMOGRAPH
IC
VARIABLES
RESPONDENTS KNOWLEDGE
CATEGO
RY
INADEWQUA
TE
n
%
1
Age
Sex
Religion
Type of family
ADEQUAT
E
n
%
50
40
10
10
41-50
years
69.23
23.08
7.69
13
51-60
years
10
83.33
16.67
12
100
22
78.57
17.86
3.57
28
Female
58.33
33.33
8.34
12
Hindu
18
78.26
17.39
4.35
23
Muslim
66.67
25
8.33
12
Christian
60
40
Others
Nuclear
11
61.11
33.33
5.56
12
Joint
17
85
10
&
Male
D
f
P
V
A
L
U
E
5.33
NS
0.
0
5
0.
0
5
0.
0
5
TOTA
L
30-40
years
61
above
2
MODERAT
E
n
%
X2
VALU
E
1.75
NS
2.05
NS
Extended
50
50
3.95
NS
0.
0
5
52.
VARIABLES
Marital
status
Educational
status
Occupation
Monthly
income of
the family
Family
history of
Diabetic
Mellitus
Source of
information
10
Married
Unmarried
Widow/
Widower
Divorce /
Separated
Primary
Secondary
High school
PUC
Graduate &
above
House wife
Private
employee
Self
employee
Retired
19
1
6
73.08
50
75
5
1
2
19.23
50
25
2
0
0
7.69
0
0
26
2
8
75
25
10
10
9
0
0
100
83.33
64.29
0
0
0
2
5
1
1
0
16.67
35.71
50
50
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
50
50
10
12
14
2
10
9
100
65.29
0
4
0
28.57
0
1
0
7.14
10
14
10
76.92
15.38
7.7
13
100
<1000
1001-2000
2001-3000
>3000
Yes
No
5
9
8
7
11
18
100
90
80
46.67
68.75
94.74
0
1
2
6
5
1
0
10
20
40
31.25
5.26
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13.33
0
0
5
10
10
15
21
19
Electronic
media
Printed
media
Health
profession
11
68.75
31.25
16
32
50
25
25
70
20
10
10
2.65
NS
0.05
27.12*
0.05
15.12*
0.05
12.26
NS
0.05
9.05*
0.05
8.09
NS
0.05
Family
Professional
90
53.
10
10
Table 13, depicts the association between demographic variables and knowledge of Diabetic
patients. The results shows educational status, occupation, family history of Diabetes Mellitus
were found to be significant at 0.05 level. Other demographic variables such as age, sex, religion,
type of family, marital status, monthly income of the family, source of information were found to
be non significant at 0.05 level.
54.
DISCUSSION
The primary aim of the study is to assess the knowledge regarding management of
Diabetes Mellitus among diabetic patients in Apoorva hospital at Faridabad with a view
to develop information booklet (on management of Diabetes Millitus). The study was also
Majority of the Respondents (32.5%) were between 41-50 years of age group.
55.
A study was conducted on knowledge of Diabetes, its treatment and complication among
diabetic patients. A cross sectional survey using structured questionnaire, the number
of sample is 101. The result shows that 90 patients had Type II Diabetes and 11 had
Type 1 Diabetes of the 101 patients. 51 thought the Diabetes to be incurable, 50
patients did not know the risk factors involved in the development of Diabetes. The study
confirms that patient knowledge about the treatment and complication o preventive
aspects. There is a definite need to empower patients with the knowledge required to
help the obtain maximum benefit from their treatment for Diabetes. 22
3. ASSOCIATION
BETWEEN
DEMOGRAPHIC
VARIABLES
AND
57.
CONCLUSION
The study was conducted to assess the knowledge level on management of Diabetes
Mellitus among diabetic patients, those who are admitted in selected hospitals at
Faridabad. In the present study 40 diabetic patients are respondents were selected by
using convenience sampling method procedure.
The research approach adapted to the present study is a descriptive design with a
view to assess the knowledge level on management of Diabetes Mellitus among diabetic
patients. The data were collected by using self administered questionnaire. The data was
interpreted by suitable statistical methods.
The present study assessed the level of knowledge among diabetic patients those
who are admitted in selected hospitals and it was found that 75.5% of diabetic patients
were having inadequate knowledge, 22.5% of diabetic patients were having moderate
knowledge level 5% of diabetic patients were having adequate knowledge.
NURSING IMPLICATIONS
The findings of the study have implications on the field of nursing practice, nursing
education, nursing research and nursing administration.
NURUSING PRACTICE :
Several implications can be drawn from the present study for nursing practice.
2. The nurse plays an important role in health promotion and managing Diabetes
Mellitus.
58.
3. Education programmes with effective teaching strategies with informational
booklets motivate people to follow healthy practice in day to day life, involving
changes in life style.
4. Every nurse should make use of this result to update the knowledge to help the
diabetic patients those who are admitted in the hospital to increase there
knowledge on management of Diabetic Mellitus by means of health education.
NURUSING EDUCATION :
2. Nursing students should be made aware of their role in health promotion and
disease prevention in the present and future years, which may help in achieving
the goal of health for all.
3. Nurse at post graduate level have to develop there skill in assessing the patients
knowledge on management of Diabetes Mellitus and preparing health teaching
material according to the needs of diabetic patients.
NURSING RESEARCH :
1. Various methods may be used to strengthen the knowledge of the people by the
investigator which should be publishing for the benefits of diabetic patients those
who are admitted in the selected hospital.
59.
2. There is a need of extensive and intensive research in this area, so that strategies
for educating nurse in managing Diabetes Mellitus can be develop.
3. She should also encourage and depute nurses to participate in such programmes
conducted by any other voluntary organization.
60.
SUMMARY
The primary aim of the study was to assess the knowledge on management of
Diabetes Mellitus among diabetic patients in selected hospitals at Faridabad.
OBJECTIVES :
1)
2)
3)
Hypothesis :
The students selected conceptual frame work for the study was based on modified
Penders health promotion model 2002.
Review of literature helped the students to develop the conceptual frame work, criteria
for assessing knowledge on management of Diabetes Mellitus among diabetic patients.
The study design consisted of a descriptive approach with the descriptive survey design.
The study population is 35-65 years of adults from selected hospitals in Faridabad.
Purposive sampling method was adopted. The study consisted of 40 samples.
The tool developed and used for data collection was structured knowledge questioners on
10 items related to demographic variables of adult and selection to consist of 35 items
related to management of Diabetes Mellitus diabetic patient in selected hospitals at
Faridabad.
Content validity of tool was established by 5 experts. The main study was conducted in
the month of May in selected hospitals at Faridabad. Structured knowledge questioner
schedule of demographic variables and knowledge on management of Diabetes Mellitus
in 35-65 years of adult were assessed.
The data gathered were analysed and interpreted according to the objectives. Descriptive
statistics were used. Mean median and standard deviation with graphical presentation of
data. Inferential statistics was used to test hypothesis at 0.05 level significance. Chisquare test was applied for finding association of knowledge on management of Diabetes
Mellitus with selected demographic variables respectively.
The result shows that 29 (72.5%) were having inadequate knowledge, 9(22.5%) were
having moderate knowledge and 2 (5%) were having adequate knowledge.
The finding of the present study regarding the aspects of diet the mean score was
2.52(36%), in medication the mean score was 2.48(24.8%), in exercise the mean score
was 0.75 (18.75%), in foot care the mean score was 2.48 (24.8%), in complication the
mean score was 0.75(18.75%).
62.
Association between demographic variables like occupation, education, family history of
Diabetes Mellitus is found to be significant. And there exist a non-significant association
with other selected demographic variables such as age, religion, type of family, marital
status, monthly income, source of information.
63.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1)
2)
Lukkmann and souensen of medical surgical nursing, nursing care of client with
endocrine disorders of pancreas.
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
Centers for disease control and prevention (2008) national diabetes fact sheets
retrived april 2008 from http//www.cdc.gov.accdphp/ddt/fact.htm
8)
All
India
diabetes
control
association
national
http//www.govt/ind/diabetes/min.nib.pubmed
diabetic
fact
sheets.
9)
10)
Long term benefits from lifestyle interventions for diabetes prevention, time to
expand the efforts, fuomilehtal etal diabetes care 2011.34
S10-S14
64.
11)
12)
13)
14)
15)
16)
17)
Belvine Perry, Florida, Judge in the sacey Anothony trial reprimanding law
18)
HUG, lakka, TA,K pipelainen to, Tuoilento J Diabetes unit department of health
promotion and chronic disease prevention, national public health institutes
mannerherimintie-166, FIN-0030, Heisinki-Finland
19)
20)
65.
21)
22)
Bruce D.G., Davis W.A., Diabetes education and knowledge in patients with
Diabetes. The Fremantale Diabetes study J. Diabetes comp 2007: 17:82-9
23)
66.
ANNEXURE I
CERTIFICATE OF CONTENT VALIDITY
This is to certify that the tool developed by Miss. Arti Memoria, Miss. Tenzin Saldon,
Miss. Tiljy.K.K, Miss. Shakarani, Miss. Usharani, Miss. Susheela Devi, Miss. Meenakshi,
Miss. Renu, Mr. Vinaya Chandran final year PCBSB Nursing student of Florence College
of Nursing Faridabad is validated by undersigned and can proceed with this tool and
conduct the main study for dissertation entitled a descriptive study to assess the
Date:
Place :
Signature of the experts
67.
ANNEXURE II
68.
Annexure III
Demographic Profile
Introduction :-
1. Age in years.
a) 30-40
b) 41-50
c) 51-60
d) 61 & above
2. Gender
a) Male
b) Female
69.
3. Religion
a) Hindu
b) Muslim
c) Christian
d) Others
4. Type of family
a) Nuclear
b) Joint
c) Extended
5. Marital Status
a) Married
b) Unmarried
c) Widow/Widower
d) Divorce/Separate
6. Educational status
a) Primary
b) Secondary
c) High School
d) PUC
e) Graduate and above
7. Occupational Status
a) Housewife
70.
b)
c)
d)
e)
Private Employee
Self employee
Retired
Agriculture
11.
Diabetes Mellitus.
a) Electronic media (T.V. Radio, Internet)
b) Printed Media (News Paper, Magazine, Book)
c) Health professional (Doctor, Nurse)
d) Family Members/ relatives/ friends.
71.
Section B
Introduction:-
[
[
]
]
]
[
[
[
]
]
]
[
[
[
]
]
]
[
[
[
]
]
]
72.
]
]
]
]
]
]
[
[
[
]
]
]
[
[
[
]
]
]
[
[
[
]
]
]
[
[
[
]
]
]
[
[
[
]
]
]
[
[
[
]
]
]
[
[
]
]
Medication
8. Oral hypoglycemic agents are effective in
a) People with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
b) People with type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
c) People with gestational Diabetes Mellitus
9. Insulin help to
a) Increase the blood glucose level
b) Maintain blood glucose level
c) Decrease the electrolyte level
73.
c) Room temperature
14. The angle of insertion of insulin syringe in
Obese patient is
a) 90o angle
b) 45o angle
c) 30o angle
[
[
[
]
]
]
74.
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
Exercise
18. A diabetic patient should do exercise at least
a) 30-45 minutes/day
b) 1 hour/day
c) 2-3 hours/day
[
[
[
]
]
]
[
[
]
]
c) Twice in a week
75.
[
[
[
]
]
[
[
[
]
]
]
[
[
[
]
]
]
[
[
]
]
76.
c) Moist
[
[
[
]
]
]
[
[
[
]
]
]
77.
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
78.
]
]
]
79.
SECTION-A
: , .
() .
1. .
) 30-40
) 41-50
) 51-60
) 61
2.
)
)
3.
)
)
)
)
80.
4.
)
)
)
5.
)
)
) /
) /
6.
)
)
)
)
)
81.
7.
)
)
)
)
)
8. _____________ .
9. , /
.
) / 1
) /
10. ____________________ _______ .
11. .
) ( , )
) (, , )
) (, )
) / / .
82.
SECTION-B
: -
, , 3
1.
)
)
)
2.
)
)
)
3.
)
)
)
83.
4.
)
)
) AMIA
5.
) ,
) ,
) ,
6.
)
)
)
7.
)
)
) 2
84.
8.
) 2
) 1
)
9.
)
)
)
10.
)
)
)
11.
)
)
)
12.
)
)
) Intramuscular
85.
13.
)
)
)
14.
) 90o
) 45o
) 30o
15. ,
)
)
)
16.
)
)
)
86.
17.
)
)
)
18.
) 30-45 /
) 1 /
) 2-3 /
19.
)
)
)
20.
)
)
)
21.
)
)
87.
)
)
22.
)
)
)
23.
)
)
)
24.
)
)
)
25.
)
)
)
88.
26.
)
)
) ()
27.
)
)
)
28.
)
)
)
29.
)
)
) Bared
30.
)
)
)
89.
31.
)
)
)
32.
)
)
)
33.
)
)
)
34.
)
)
)
35. tangling
)
)
)
90.
Annexure IV
Answer And Scores Key
ITEM NO
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
CORRECT RESPONSES
C
A
A
A
C
B
B
A
B
B
A
SCORES
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
12
13
14
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
A
B
A
C
A
A
B
C
A
A
C
B
A
C
A
A
C
A
B
C
A
B
A
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Total
91.