Rezultat

(v4.
03)
ArcelorMittal Composite Bridge Predesign

Preliminary design software for composite bridges
PRELIMINARY DESIGN NOTE
Company : Universitatea Tehnica Cluj-Napoca

User name : Pop Paul
Project name : Structuri compuse otel-beton
Project reference :
Comment :
Date : 01.02.2015
Universitatea Tehnica Cluj-Napoca

(v4.03)
Project reference :
Comment :
All the preliminary design notes done by our company and/or by any other subsidiaries of the ARCELORMITTAL group of
our choice are based on the information received from the Customer. These preliminary design notes are given for guidance
only. As such, they do not commit our company and/or any other subsidiary of the ARCELORMITTAL group to the
achievement of a result expected by the Customer and/or any third person. These preliminary design notes cannot replace
all the preliminary design notes which shall be done by an external engineering office chosen by the Customer. Our
company and/or any other subsidiary of the ARCELORMITTAL group cannot be held liable for any loss or damage, directly or
indirectly sustained as a result of the use of the preliminary design notes done by our company and\or by any other
subsidiaries of the ARCELORMITTAL group, whatever the origin of the damage.

Date : 01.02.2015
Page 1 / 19
F:\...\COMPLET PAUL\VARIANTA 1\PAUL.APM

(v4.03)
Project reference :
Comment :
DATA
ROAD BRIDGE - Conventional beam and slab superstructure
Eurocodes EN
Span length 1 = 24.000 m
3 spans

Slab dimensions
Width = 10.000 m
Thickness = 30.0 cm
Haunch = 15.0 cm
5 beam lines (Distance to left-hand edge of deck slab)
Line 1 : 1.500 m
Centre distance = 1.750 m
Line 2 : 3.250 m
Line 3 : 5.000 m
Line 4 : 6.750 m
Line 5 : 8.500 m
Shear studs : 19x175
Reinforcement ratio = 3.0 %
Top layer : 70 %
Distance to top of slab = 4.0 cm
Bottom layer : 30 %
Distance between bottom of slab = 4.0 cm
Propping :
No propping of main beams during deck slab concreting.
Overhang :
Overhang formwork suspended from the two outermost beams only.

An equivalent superimposed dead load is taken into account in the calculation of the slab weight
Reinforcing steel
fy = 500.00 N/mm
Structural steel S355 (WITH reduction of yield strength with thickness)

3
Density = 7850 kg/m

Concrete Class C35/45
Density = 2650 kg/m
-6
Shrinkage strain = 200.10

Temperature difference between slab and beams = 10 C
Material properties used in calculations
Yield strength of the steel of girders
Yield strength of the reinforcing steel
fy = 345.0 MPa
fy = 500.0 MPa

Date : 01.02.2015
Page 2 / 19

(v4.03)
Project reference :
Comment :
Modulus of elasticity
Limit compressive strenght of concrete
Ecm = 34077 MPa

fck = 35 MPa
Steel sections
span 1
Left-hand edge beam
HE 1000 M
Intermediate beams
HE 1000 M
Right-hand edge beam
HE 1000 M
Left-hand edge beam
HE 1000 M
span 2
Intermediate beams
HE 1000 M
HE 1000 M
Left-hand edge beam
HE 1000 M
Intermediate beams
HE 1000 M
HE 1000 M
span 3
Cracked regions
Support lines
LH side (m)
RH side (m)
C0
P1
3.600 (15 %)
4.350 (15 %)
P2
4.350 (15 %)
3.600 (15 %)
C3
Footways and restraint systems

LH footway width: 1.500 m
RH footway, width: 1.500 m
LH restraint system, distance to LH edge of deck slab 1.500 m
RH restraint system, distance to RH edge of deck slab 1.500 m
Bridge class : 1
Superimposed dead loads of deck surfacing or ballast, footways or maintenance walkways etc - SDL1
3
Footways
Thickness = 20.0 cm
LH footway width = 1.50 m
RH footway width = 1.50 m
Density = 2000.0 kg/m
Waterproofing
Thickness = 3.0 cm
Surfacing
Thickness = 8.0 cm
Parapets
left-hand side
right-hand side
x = 0.10 m
x = 0.10 m
q = 1.00 kN/m
q = 1.00 kN/m
Restraint system
left-hand side
right-hand side
x = 1.50 m
x = 1.50 m
q = 1.00 kN/m
q = 1.00 kN/m
3
3

Date : 01.02.2015
Page 3 / 19

(v4.03)
Project reference :
Comment :
2
Distributed load = 5.00 kN/m
Live loads on footways

Left-hand footway
Width of loaded area = 1.50 m
Distance to slab edge = 0.00 m
Right-hand footway
Width of loaded area = 1.50 m
Distance to slab edge = 0.00 m
Definition of truck load models

Abnormal load :
None
Fatigue load model :
Load model on both edge lanes

Mean gross weight of truck : 600. kN
Number of trucks : 2.00 millions per year and slow lane
Service life (years) : 100
Support height ajustments and settlements

Height adjustments
Settlements
Support line No. 0
0 mm
0 mm
Support line No. 1
0 mm
0 mm
Support line No. 2
0 mm
0 mm
Support line No. 3
0 mm
0 mm

Date : 01.02.2015
Page 4 / 19

(v4.03)
Project reference :
Comment :
Assumptions for calculation and checks

Calculation coefficients
Diaphragms
Coefficient for inertia = 0.10

Coefficient for mass = 0.10
Slab elements
Coefficient for inertia - longitudinal = 1.00

Coefficient for inertia - transverse = 1.00
Serviceability Limit States

Deflection due to live loads limited to 1/ 500 of span length
Partial safety factor for the structural steel
Partial safety factor for shear resistance of studs
M,ser = 1.00
v = 1.25
Ultimate Limit States

Partial safety factors :
for sections resistance
for buckling resistance
for slab concrete strength
for shear resistance of studs
M0 = 1.00
M1 = 1.10
c = 1.50
M = 1.15
Fatigue Limit States

Ff = 1.00
Partial safety factors for fatigue loading

Top flange :
Partial safety factor for fatigue strength
Detail category
Mf = 1.15
80 MPa
Bottom flange :
Partial safety factor for fatigue strength
Detail category
Mf = 1.15
160 MPa

Date : 01.02.2015
Page 5 / 19

(v4.03)
Project reference :
Comment :
Weighting factors for SDL1 :
Increase
Reduction
Waterproofing
1.20
0.80
Surfacing
1.40
0.80
Footways
1.00
1.00
Adjustment factors applied to load model 1 (UDL + TS) :

Q1
Qi (i>1)
q1
qi(i>1)
qr
Class 1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Class 2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Class 3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
The class of the bridge is : Class 1

Partial factors for loads - Combination factors :
Partial factors for loads (ULS) :
G = 1.35
Q = 1.35
Q = 1.50
P = 1.00
G,set = 1.20
S = 1.00
Permanent loads
Traffic loads
Other variable loads
Height adjustments
Settlements
Shrinkage
Combination factors :
0
'1
gr1a TS
0.75
0.75
0.00
0.80
gr1a UDL
0.40
0.40
0.00
0.80
gr5
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
TK
0.60
0.60
0.50

Date : 01.02.2015
Page 6 / 19

(v4.03)
Project reference :
Comment :
LIST OF LOAD CASES

No.
Symbol
Name of load case
PP
Self-weight
SS
SDL1
15.54
SS+
Increased SDL1
15.54
SS-
Reduced SDL1
15.54
EQ
SDL2
15.54
TH+
Simpl. temp. load +DTC
15.72
TH-
Simpl. temp. load -DTC
15.72
RE
Concrete shrinkage
15.72
Modular ratio
-
Eigenmode
6.16
10
UDL
Load model 1 UDL
6.16
11
TS
Load model 1 TS
6.16
12
TR
Load on footways
6.16

Date : 01.02.2015
Page 7 / 19

(v4.03)
Project reference :
Comment :
LIST OF ULS COMBINATIONS

ULS combinations
1
10
11
12
PP
SS+
SS-
EQ
TH+
TH-
RE
UDL
TS
TR
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.35
0.81
1.35
1.35
1.35
0.81
0.54
1.01
0.32
0.54
1.01
0.32
0.54
1.01
0.32
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.50
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.50
1.50
0.54
1.01
0.32
1.35
1.00
1.35
1.35
0.81
1.35
1.00
1.35
1.35
0.81
1.00
0.54
1.01
0.32
1.00
0.54
1.01
0.32
1.00
0.54
1.01
0.32
1.00
0.54
1.01
0.32
1.35
1.35
1.35
10
1.35
1.35
1.35
11
1.35
1.35
1.35
12
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50

Date : 01.02.2015
Page 8 / 19

(v4.03)
Project reference :
Comment :
LIST OF SLS COMBINATIONS

Characteristics SLS combinations
1
10
11
12
PP
SS+
SS-
EQ
TH+
TH-
RE
UDL
TS
TR
1.00
1.00
0.60
1.00
1.00
0.60
1.00
0.60
1.00
1.00
0.60
0.60
1.00
1.00
0.60
0.60
1.00
1.00
0.60
0.40
0.75
0.24
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
10
1.00
11
1.00
12
1.00
13
1.00
14
1.00
15
1.00
16
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.40
0.75
0.24
1.00
1.00
0.40
0.75
0.24
1.00
1.00
0.40
0.75
0.24
1.00
0.60
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.60
1.00
0.60
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.60
0.60
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.60
0.60
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.60
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.40
0.75
0.24
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.40
0.75
0.24
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.40
0.75
0.24
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.40
0.75
0.24

Date : 01.02.2015
Page 9 / 19

(v4.03)
Project reference :
Comment :
Frequent SLS combinations

1
10
11
12
PP
SS+
SS-
EQ
TH+
TH-
RE
UDL
TS
TR
17
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.50
0.40
0.75
0.24
18
1.00
1.00
0.50
19
1.00
20
1.00
21
1.00
22
1.00
23
1.00
24
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.40
0.75
0.24
1.00
0.50
0.40
0.75
0.24
1.00
0.50
0.40
0.75
0.24
1.00
0.50
1.00
0.40
0.75
0.24
1.00
0.50
1.00
0.40
0.75
0.24
1.00
0.50
1.00
0.40
0.75
0.24
1.00
0.50
1.00
0.40
0.75
0.24

Date : 01.02.2015
Page 10 / 19

(v4.03)
Project reference :
Comment :
Quasi-permanent SLS combinations

1
10
11
12
PP
SS+
SS-
EQ
TH+
TH-
RE
UDL
TS
TR
25
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.50
26
1.00
1.00
27
1.00
1.00
1.00
28
1.00
1.00
1.00
29
1.00
1.00
1.00
30
1.00
1.00
1.00
31
1.00
1.00
1.00
32
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.50
1.00
1.00
0.50
1.00

Date : 01.02.2015
Page 11 / 19

(v4.03)
Project reference :
Comment :
Infrequent SLS combinations

1
10
11
12
PP
SS+
SS-
EQ
TH+
TH-
RE
UDL
TS
TR
33
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.60
0.80
0.80
0.48
34
1.00
1.00
0.60
35
1.00
36
1.00
37
1.00
38
1.00
39
1.00
40
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.80
0.80
0.48
1.00
0.60
0.80
0.80
0.48
1.00
0.60
0.80
0.80
0.48
1.00
0.60
1.00
0.80
0.80
0.48
1.00
0.60
1.00
0.80
0.80
0.48
1.00
0.60
1.00
0.80
0.80
0.48
1.00
0.60
1.00
0.80
0.80
0.48

Date : 01.02.2015
Page 12 / 19

(v4.03)
Project reference :
Comment :
ESTIMATED QUANTITIES
Structural steel sections :
Steel grade : S355
Lengths (m)
Position
Span
Number
Profile
Nominal
On/Under
Sum
Weight (t)
Pre-camber (cm)
HE 1000 M
24.00
0.20
24.20
42.195
4.3
HE 1000 M
29.00
0.00
29.00
50.562
3.9
HE 1000 M
24.00
0.20
24.20
42.195
4.3
134.951
Shear connectors :
Position
Span
Number
Weight (t)
997
0.428
1233
0.529
1000
0.429
1.386
Slab concrete :
2
Surface of slab : 770.00 m
Volume (m3)
Position
Span
77.4
93.6
77.4
248.4
NB :
- The indicated beam lengths and pre-cambers correspond to span lengths.
Supply specifications may differ, depending on the position of any splices.
Constraints associated with fabrication, finishing, transport, and handling are to be checked on a case-by-case basis.
- The quantities indicated for beams do not include stiffeners, bearing plates, diaphragms, end plates, etc.
These items are to be added in accordance with the features of the structure.
- The number of shear connectors given includes a flat 30% increase over the theoretical quantity
to take account of fabrication practice.

Date : 01.02.2015
Page 13 / 19

(v4.03)
Project reference :
Comment :
Mass on slab :
Waterproofing (t)
Surfacing (t)
Footways (t)
Subtotal (t)
Span 1
12.096
32.256
28.800
73.152
Span 2
14.616
38.976
34.800
88.392
Span 3
12.096
32.256
28.800
73.152
TOTAL
38.808
103.488
92.400
234.696

Date : 01.02.2015
Page 14 / 19

(v4.03)
Project reference :
Comment :
NUMBER OF CONNECTORS
19x175 : d = 19.0 mm - h = 175.0 mm
Row 1
Row 2
Row 3
Row 4
Row 5
254
165
159
165
254
997
0.428
315
204
195
204
315
1233
0.529
254
164
164
164
254
1000
0.429
3230
1.386
span
NB :
Total
Weight (t)
- The number of shear connectors given includes a flat 30% increase over the theoretical quantity
to take account of fabrication practice.

Date : 01.02.2015
Page 15 / 19

(v4.03)
Project reference :
Comment :
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Summary for bridge
Criterion : LTBuckling (Ultimate Limit State)
Max. ratio = 0.91
< 1.00
SATISFACTORY
Combination No.7
Beam line No.5 - Cross-section No.27 : Position = 24.00 m (intermediate support)
_________________________________
Summary for span No. 1
Max. ratio = 0.83
< 1.00
SATISFACTORY
Combination No.7
Max. ratio = 0.91
< 1.00
SATISFACTORY
Combination No.7
Max. ratio = 0.83
< 1.00
SATISFACTORY
Combination No.7
Checking minimum reinforcement criterion

Reference : EN 1994-2:2005 7.4.2
Slab reinforcement ratio : 3.00 %
The criterion is satisfied for all design cross-sections, for 20 mm diameter bars.

Date : 01.02.2015
Page 16 / 19

Rezultat

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Rezultat

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

(v4.

ArcelorMittal Composite Bridge Predesign

PRELIMINARY DESIGN NOTE

Company : Universitatea Tehnica Cluj-Napoca

Universitatea Tehnica Cluj-Napoca

User name : Pop Paul

Universitatea Tehnica Cluj-Napoca

Span length 2 = 29.000 m

Distance to top of slab = 4.0 cm

Distance between bottom of slab = 4.0 cm

No propping of main beams during deck slab concreting.

Overhang formwork suspended from the two outermost beams only.

Structural steel S355 (WITH reduction of yield strength with thickness)

Density = 7850 kg/m

Density = 2650 kg/m

Shrinkage strain = 200.10

User name : Pop Paul

Universitatea Tehnica Cluj-Napoca

Ecm = 34077 MPa

Left-hand edge beam

Right-hand edge beam

Left-hand edge beam

Right-hand edge beam

Left-hand edge beam

Right-hand edge beam

Footways and restraint systems

Density = 2000.0 kg/m

Density = 2400.0 kg/m

Density = 2400.0 kg/m

User name : Pop Paul

Universitatea Tehnica Cluj-Napoca

Distributed load = 5.00 kN/m

Live loads on footways

Width of loaded area = 1.50 m

Distance to slab edge = 0.00 m

Width of loaded area = 1.50 m

Distance to slab edge = 0.00 m

Definition of truck load models

Fatigue load model :

Load model on both edge lanes

Support height ajustments and settlements

Support line No. 0

Support line No. 1

Support line No. 2

Support line No. 3

User name : Pop Paul

Universitatea Tehnica Cluj-Napoca

Assumptions for calculation and checks

Coefficient for inertia = 0.10

Coefficient for inertia - longitudinal = 1.00

Serviceability Limit States

Ultimate Limit States

Fatigue Limit States

Partial safety factors for fatigue loading

User name : Pop Paul

Universitatea Tehnica Cluj-Napoca

Weighting factors for SDL1 :

Adjustment factors applied to load model 1 (UDL + TS) :

The class of the bridge is : Class 1

User name : Pop Paul

Universitatea Tehnica Cluj-Napoca

LIST OF LOAD CASES

Name of load case