Professional Documents
Culture Documents
S C IE N C E
Math+Statistics=GreatBeach
Reading
JUL29,20148:03AMEDT
ByPeterR.Orszag
aA
IfyouhaveavacationcomingupinAugustandyourelookingforafunbooktoreadthatwill
alsoenlightenyou,itwouldbehardtobeatJordanEllenbergsHowNottoBeWrong:The
PowerofMathematicalThinking.Ellenberg,amathprofessorattheUniversityofWisconsin,
showshowmathematicsandstatisticshelpusunderstandtheworldbetterbutdoessoinaway
thatskipstheformalitiesandallowseveryonetofollowtheargument.Andthelessonsare
powerful.
Heresanexample.DuringWorldWarII,theU.S.militarywastryingtooptimizethearmor
platingonitsairplanes.Officialsnoticedthatthebulletholesinplanesreturningfromcombatin
Europefollowedcertainpatterns:Thereweremorepersquarefootinthefuselagethaninthe
enginesection.Theyfiguredthattheythereforeneededtoaddmoreprotectiontothefuselage,but
wantedhelpindetermininghowmuchmoretobalancetheextraprotectionagainstthelossof
fuelefficiencyandmaneuverability.
ThemilitarytookthisproblemtoAbrahamWaldoftheStatisticalResearchGroup.Wald,who
spentmostofhiscareerasastatisticsprofessoratColumbiaUniversity,camebackwitha
surprisinganswer:Addnoplatingtothefuselage.Instead,addittotheenginearea.
Wald'sreasonwasthatunlesstheenemywasforsomeoddreasonsuccessfullytargetingthe
fuselages,thebulletholesonthereturningplanesshowedwheretheplanescouldwithstandattack
andstillsurvive.Thepaucityofbulletholesontheenginecasingsofthereturningplanes
suggestedthathitstothatareatendedtobringdowntheplane.Returningplanes,inotherwords,
http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-07-29/math-statistics-great-beach-reading
1/3
6/16/2015
wereabiasedsampleoftheplanesthatwereattacked.Thelesson:Thinkaboutwherethebullet
holesarent.
AnotherexampleofsubtlebiasesinvolvesBerksonsfallacy,namedafterthemedicalstatistician
JosephBerkson.Assume,forexample,thatsomeonehasnoticedthateconomistshardlyeverdrink
DietCokeand,toseeiftheobservationisstatisticallycorrect,gathersinformationabouteveryone
whodrinksDietCokeandeveryonewhoisaneconomist.Berksonsfallacyshowsthattheresult
willsuggestanegativecorrelationbetweenDietCokeandbeinganeconomist,evenifthereisnt
one.
Why?Assumethereare1,000peopleinasmalltownwheretheanalystdecidestothestudythe
subject:250residentsdrinkDietCoke,200ofthemareeconomists,and50ofthemareeconomists
whodrinkDietCoke.AnanalysisofthosewhoeitherdrinkDietCokeorareeconomistswould
include50economistswhodrinkDietCoke,150economistswhodontdrinkDietCoke,and200
noneconomistswhodrinkDietCoke.Theanalysiswouldthussuggestthateconomistsweremuch
lesslikelytodrinkDietCoke(50outof250)thannoneconomists(200outof200).
Youcanseetheheadlines:DrinkDietCokeifyouwanttoavoidbeinganeconomist!Butthat
conclusionwouldbewrongfortworeasons.Thefirst,asyoumayalreadyknow,isthatcorrelation
isnotcausation.Berksonsfallacy,though,suggeststhecorrelationitselfismisleading.Inreality,
25percentofbotheconomistsandnoneconomistsdrinkDietCokethereisnocorrelation
betweenoneandtheother.(Theproblemisthatthesurveydidnotincludethenoneconomists
whodontdrinkDietCoke.)
EllenbergshowshowmanyrealworldconclusionssufferfromBerksonsfallacyevenromantic
frustrations(includedinasectionpartiallytitledwhyarehandsomemensuchjerks?).Healso
writesabouthothandsinbasketball,astatisticalanalysisoftheBibleandhowunlikelyeventscan
happenalot,ifgivenenoughchances.
OurpublicdiscoursewouldbemuchimprovedifthebasiclessonsofHowNottoBeWrong
werebetterappreciatedincludinghoweasyitistobemisledbystatisticalbiasesandsimplistic
extrapolations.Andthoughthetopicsareweighty,Ellenbergswritingisnot.Itmightjustbethe
firstmathbookyoucanenjoyreadingonthebeach.
Tocontactthewriterofthisarticle:PeterOrszagatorszagbloomberg@gmail.com.
Tocontacttheeditorresponsibleforthisarticle:MaryDuenwaldatmduenwald@bloomberg.net.
http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-07-29/math-statistics-great-beach-reading
2/3
6/16/2015
http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-07-29/math-statistics-great-beach-reading
3/3