Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1007/s12035-014-8928-x
Introduction
The toxicological consequences due to heavy metal exposure
from anthropogenic and environmental sources have been
recognized as a major health concern globally [1, 2]. Among
the group of heavy metals with proven toxicity in human, lead
(Pb), a ubiquitous pollutant in the ecosystem, is known to be
highly neurotoxic [3] and developmental neurotoxic [4]. The
major Pb-induced neurological disorders reported in humans
and experimental animals are behavioral abnormalities, learning impairment, decreased hearing, impaired cognitive function, etc. [5]. Despite several in vitro [6, 7], in vivo [8, 9] and
epidemiological [10] studies, the exact mechanism(s) of Pbinduced neurotoxicity in both fetus/children and adults have
still not been elucidated and are also not well understood.
However, among the several proposed mechanisms of Pbinduced neurotoxicity, the oxidative stress-mediated apoptosis
is the most prominent [1113]. Pb exposure increases the
levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and intracellular
Ca2+, which in turn disturbs the mitochondrial membrane
potential, leading to release of mitochondrial cytochrome-c
in the cytoplasm by activating caspase cascade-mediated apoptotic cell death [1416]. It also disturbs the antioxidant
defense system via thiol binding [17, 18] and by its calcium
mimicking ability [15]. Previous reports showed significant
altered manifestations of Pb intoxication due to individuals
Mol Neurobiol
Mol Neurobiol
Ca2 i K d FoFmin=FmaxFo
Mol Neurobiol
Table 1 Real-time PCR: the sequences of primers for real-time PCR were
Gene name
-actin
CYP-2E1
GSTA4-4
p53
Bax
Bcl2
HSP70
Caspase-9
Caspase-3
Mol Neurobiol
specific monoclonal antibodies. For immunocytochemical analysis studies, cells were seeded in PLL-pre-coated eight-well
chamber slides at a density of 1104 cells/well. After the exposures, the cells were washed with PBS (100 l/well) and stained
with Mitotracker dye (100 nM) for 1 h at 37 C, then fixed in 4 %
paraformaldehyde. Cells were then washed twice with PBS and
incubated for 15 min in PBS containing 0.02 % Triton100 and
0.1 % BSA to block the nonspecific binding sites. The cells were
then incubated with primary antibodies of Cytochrome-c and
Bax for 24 h. The antibodies were diluted in PBS containing
0.02 % Triton100 and 0.1 % BSA. The cells were then washed
three times with PBS and re-incubated for 2 h at room temperature with secondary anti-primary immunoglobulin G (IgG)
conjugated with rhodamine fluorescence dye (Calbiochem,
USA). Cells were visualized under upright microscope (Nikon
Eclipse 80i equipped with Nikon DS-Ri1 12.7 megapixel camera, Japan) and quantified by measuring the change in percent
area of protein expression with the help of Leica Qwin 500
Image Analysis Software (Leica, Germany).
Caspase-9/3 Activity Caspase-9/3 activity was assessed as per
the protocols of the manufacturer (Biovision, Catalog no. K119
and K106, USA). After exposure to Pb (10 M), ethanol
(200 mM), Pb (10 M)+ethanol (200 mM), NAC (10 M),
and Pb (10 M)+ethanol (200 mM)+NAC (10 M) for 24 h,
cells were pelleted, re-suspended in pre-chilled extraction buffer (50 l), and incubated on ice for 10 min. The samples were
then centrifuged for 5 min at 500g, and supernatant (50 l/
well) was transferred to 96-well culture plates. Assay buffer
(50 l) and substrate conjugate (5 l) of caspase-9 and caspase3 were added, mixed well, and incubated for 1 h at 37 C in
dark. Upon completion of incubation period, cells were mixed
thoroughly and read absorbance was read at 405 nm for both
caspases. The values of exposed groups were compared with
unexposed control sets, and the data were expressed as a
percentage of control. Cells exposed to H2O2 (100 M) for
6 h under identical conditions were used as a positive control.
Statistical Analysis Results were expressed as meanstandard error of mean (SEM) for the values obtained from at
least three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was
performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and
Dunnetts multiple comparison test using GraphPad Prism
(Version 5.0) software. The valves */#p<0.05 were considered
as significant, ** /##p < 0.01 more significant, and *** /
###
p<0.001 highly significant.
Results
Cytotoxicity Studies A concentration-dependent decrease in
the percent cell viability was observed in PC12 cells exposed
to Pb (10200 M) for 24 h. Pb concentration at 10 M was
Mol Neurobiol
Mol Neurobiol
Fig. 1
the exposure to Pb (10 M)+ethanol (200 mM) with antioxidant (NAC 10 M) in comparison to LPO induction due to
Pb (10 M)+ethanol (200 mM) exposure. Moreover, cells
exposed to H2O2 (10 M) for 6 h have also shown highly
significant increase in the levels of LPO (Fig. 4b).
Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Flow cytometric analysis
clearly showed that co-exposure to Pb (10 M) and ethanol
(200 mM) induced maximum reduction (19.3 %) in mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) compared with individual
exposures to Pb 10 M (15.7 %) and ethanol 200 mM (7.4 %),
respectively. On the other hand, NAC (10 M) reduced the
adverse effect of Pb (10 M)+ethanol (200 mM) by 15.8 %
when given together. Cells exposed to H2O2 (100 M) for 6 h
have also shown a significant reduction (17.0 %) in MMP
(Fig. 5)
TUNEL Assay Pb- and/or ethanol-induced apoptosis was also
assessed using the TUNEL assay with the help of FACS
analysis (Fig. 6). Exposure to Pb and ethanol separately was
found to induce apoptosis of 7.9 and 3.9 %. These changes
were synergistic in case of co-exposure to Pb and ethanol, i.e.,
12 %. Pb and ethanol induced apoptotic changes, which could
be reverted back towards the basal level (6.8 %) in cells
simultaneously exposed to NAC (10 M) (Fig. 6)
Transcriptional Changes Pb and/or ethanol exposureinduced alterations in the mRNA expression of marker genes
associated with oxidative stress and apoptosis and are presented in Fig. 7. Though, the individual exposures to Pb and
Fig. 2 Measurement of
intracellular Ca2+ levels (nmol/l)
in PC 12 cells. Cells exposed to
Pb (10 M) and/or ethanol
(200 mM) at various time periods
from 5 to 60 min. *p<0.05,
**p<0.01, ***p<0.001
(unexposed control vs.
experimental group)
Mol Neurobiol
Fig. 3 ROS generation
measurement by fluorescence
microscope using 2,7dichlorodihydrofluorescein
diacetate (DCFH-DA) dye. a
Cells (1106) received exposure
of Pb (10 M), ethanol
(200 mM), Pb (10 M)+ethanol
(200 mM), NAC (10 M), and Pb
(10 M)+ethanol (200 mM)+
NAC (10 M) for 24 h.
Following the exposure, cells
were incubated with DCFH-DA
(20 M) for 30 min at 37 C, and
then, microphotographs were
taken by Nikon phase contrast
cum fluorescence microscope
(model 80i), and for fluorescence,
quantification was done using
Leica Q win500 image analysis
Software. b Relative
quantification of fold induction in
ROS generation by intracellular
image analysis, receiving the
exposure of Pb (10 M), ethanol
(200 mM), Pb (10 M)+ethanol
(200 mM), NAC (10 M), and Pb
(10 M)+ethanol (200 mM)+
NAC (10 M) at 24 h. Cells
exposed to H2O2 (100 M) for
6 h under identical experimental
conditions and served as positive
control. */#p<0.05, **/##p<0.01,
***/###p<0.001,*=p<0.05;
**p<0.01, ***p<0.001
(unexposed control vs.
experimental group); #p<0.05,
##
p<0.01, ###p<0.001 (compared
between treated groups)
Discussion
The working hypothesis for the present investigation was to
study, whether the co-exposure of non-cytotoxic concentrations of Pb and ethanol leads to oxidative stress which further
precedes apoptotic condition in PC12 cells, a most
Mol Neurobiol
Fig. 4 Analysis of oxidative stress marker glutathione and lipid peroxidation. a Levels of glutathione (GSH) expressed in nanomoles per milligram protein following the exposure of Pb (10 M), ethanol (200 mM),
Pb (10 M)+ethanol (200 mM), Pb (10 M)+ethanol (200 mM)+NAC
(10 M), and NAC (10 M) after 24 h. b Levels of lipid peroxidation
(LPO) expressed in nanomoles per 10 mg protein following the exposure
of Pb (10 M), ethanol (200 mM), Pb (10 M)+ethanol (200 mM), Pb
(10 M)+ethanol (200 mM)+NAC (10 M), and NAC (10 M) after
24 h. */#p<0.05, **/##p<0.01, ***/###p<0.001, *p<0.05; **p<0.01,
***p<0.001 (unexposed control vs. experimental group); #p<0.05,
##
p<0.01, ###p<0.001 (compared between treated groups)
oligodendroglia by decreasing the expression of genes associated with myelination, insulin-responsiveness and mitochondrial functions, and increased indices of apoptosis, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, lipid peroxidation,
DNA damage, and deregulated acetylcholine homeostasis
[3033].
We observed an increase in the production of [Ca2+]i, ROS,
and associated oxidative stress in cells receiving either Pb or
ethanol individually. However, cells co-exposed to Pb and
ethanol demonstrated more pronounced levels of [Ca2+]i,
ROS production, and oxidative stress. Pb is reported to induce
oxidative stress by inhibiting the enzymatic activity by its
binding to the active thiol site, while ethanol-induced oxidative stress results due to conversion of ethanol into acetaldehyde [48]. Based on the results, it may be concluded that Pb
and ethanol synergistically induce the adverse effects. The
synergistic response for oxidative stress under the influence
of co-exposure to Pb and ethanol in experimental animals has
been reported to be associated with increased production of
ROS [49]. ROS are oxygen-containing molecules, such as
hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), superoxide anion (O2), and hydroxyl radical (HO) that are involved in redox signaling. To
confirm the ROS redox signaling under identical experimental
conditions, PC12 cells were exposed to H2O2 (100 M for
6 h), which served as positive control. H2O2-induced ROS
production was similar as in the case of Pb and/or ethanol,
suggesting involvement of similar signal transduction pathways. The significant reduction in ROS in the presence of a
known antioxidant, NAC, with co-exposure to Pb and ethanol
in PC12 cells, further confirms the involvement of ROS in
toxicity. NAC works as a GSH precursor, and is an important
cellular antioxidant and plays a major role in protecting the cells
against oxidative stress through direct scavenging of ROS [50].
NAC treatment provided a sufficiently strong antioxidant defense system, resulting in restoring LPO and GSH of cells
exposed to a combination of Pb and ethanol. A similar kind
of effect had also been noticed in SHSY5Y cell line, which was
treated with the antioxidant NAC against arsenic and dopamine
[51]. Thus, the present study demonstrated that the cytotoxicity induced by the co-exposure to Pb and ethanol could be
attenuated by antioxidant NAC (data not shown), suggesting
that increased ROS generation and reduction in antioxidant
defense system are responsible for the decreased cell viability.
The abundant amount of oxygen supply to the brain and
high lipid contents in the cells make brain cells more susceptible to oxidative stress-mediated toxicity of Pb and ethanol.
The limited regeneration and repair capacities of neuronal
cells also add to that. A dose-dependent loss in cell viability
was observed after independent exposure to Pb and ethanol.
The magnitude of viability loss was significantly increased
upon co-exposure to both Pb and ethanol. This increase in the
loss of cell viability could be correlated well with the increased production of ROS and subsequently associated
Mol Neurobiol
Mol Neurobiol
Mol Neurobiol
Mol Neurobiol
Mol Neurobiol
Fig. 10 Induction in the activity
of caspase-9/3 in PC12 cells
following the exposure of Pb
(10 M), ethanol (200 mM), Pb
(10 M)+ethanol (200 mM),
NAC (10 M), and Pb (10 M)+
ethanol (200 mM)+NAC
(10 M) for 24 h. a Induction in
the activity of caspase-9. b
Induction in the activity of
caspase-3. Cells exposed to H2O2
(100 M) for 6 h under identical
conditions were used as a positive
control. */#p<0.05, **/##p<0.01,
***/###p<0.001,*p<0.05;
**p<0.01, ***p<0.001
(unexposed control vs.
experimental group); #p<0.05,
##
p<0.01, ###p<0.001 (compared
between treated groups)
Mol Neurobiol
Fig. 11 Schematic flow diagram
to represent apoptotic pathway
involved in PC12 cells exposed to
Pb and/or ethanol
more pronounced increase in oxidative stress and apoptosis than to the independent exposures to Pb and
ethanol.
Acknowledgments The authors are grateful to the Director, IITR, Lucknow, India, for his keen interest in the study. Financial support from Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science & Technology, Government of
India, New Delhi, India [Grant No. 102/IFD/SAN/PR1524/20102011];
Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science & Technology,
Government of India, New Delhi, India [Grant No. SR/SO/Z 36/2007/91/10];
and Council of Scientific & Industrial Research, Government of India, New
Delhi, India [Grant No. BSC0111/INDEPTH/ CSIR Network Project] is
acknowledged. Indian Council of Medical Research, (ICMR), New Delhi,
India, is acknowledged for providing the fellowship to Dr. Vivek Kumar. The
funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to
publish, or preparation of the article.
Conflict of Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Briggs D (2003) Environmental pollution and the global burden of
disease. Br Med Bull 68:124
2. Tong S, von Schirnding YE, Prapamontol T (2000) Environmental
lead exposure: a public health problem of global dimensions. Bull
World Health Organ 78:10681077
3. Florea AM, Busselberg D (2006) Occurrence, use and potential toxic
effects of metals and metal compounds. Biometals 19:419427
4. Giordano G, Costa LG (2012) Developmental neurotoxicity: some
old and new issues. ISRN Toxicol 2012:814795
5. Zheng W, Aschner M, Ghersi-Egea JF (2003) Brain barrier systems:
a new frontier in metal neurotoxicological research. Toxicol Appl
Pharmacol 192:111
Mol Neurobiol
6. Kolesarova A, Roychoudhury S, Slivkova J, Sirotkin A, Capcarova
M, Massanyi P (2010) In vitro study on the effects of lead and mercury
on porcine ovarian granulosa cells. J Environ Sci Health ATox Hazard
Subst Environ Eng 45:320331
7. Mrugesh T, Dipa L, Manishika G (2011) Effect of lead on human
erythrocytes: an in vitro study. Acta Pol Pharm 68:653656
8. Conterato GM, Augusti PR, Somacal S, Einsfeld L, Sobieski R,
Torres JR, Emanuelli T (2007) Effect of lead acetate on cytosolic
thioredoxin reductase activity and oxidative stress parameters in rat
kidneys. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 101:96100
9. Dewanjee S, Sahu R, Karmakar S, Gangopadhyay M (2013) Toxic
effects of lead exposure in Wistar rats: involvement of oxidative
stress and the beneficial role of edible jute (Corchorus olitorius)
leaves. Food Chem Toxicol 55:7891
10. Hu H, Shih R, Rothenberg S, Schwartz BS (2007) The epidemiology
of lead toxicity in adults: measuring dose and consideration of other
methodologic issues. Environ Health Perspect 115:455462
11. Lidsky TI, Schneider JS (2003) Lead neurotoxicity in children: basic
mechanisms and clinical correlates. Brain 126:519
12. Lu X, Jin C, Yang J, Liu Q, Wu S, Li D, Guan Y, Cai Y (2013)
Prenatal and lactational lead exposure enhanced oxidative stress and
altered apoptosis status in offspring rats hippocampus. Biol Trace
Elem Res 151:7584
13. Sanders T, Liu Y, Buchner V, Tchounwou PB (2009) Neurotoxic
effects and biomarkers of lead exposure: a review. Rev Environ
Health 24:1545
14. Chen L, Yang X, Jiao H, Zhao B (2003) Tea catechins protect against
lead-induced ROS formation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and calcium dysregulation in PC12 cells. Chem Res Toxicol 16:11551161
15. Flora SJ, Saxena G, Mehta A (2007) Reversal of lead-induced neuronal
apoptosis by chelation treatment in rats: role of reactive oxygen species
and intracellular Ca(2+). J Pharmacol Exp Ther 322:108116
16. He L, Poblenz AT, Medrano CJ, Fox DA (2000) Lead and calcium
produce rod photoreceptor cell apoptosis by opening the mitochondrial permeability transition pore. J Biol Chem 275:1217512184
17. Aimo L, Oteiza PI (2006) Zinc deficiency increases the susceptibility
of human neuroblastoma cells to lead-induced activator protein-1
activation. Toxicol Sci 91:184191
18. Patra RC, Rautray AK, Swarup D (2011) Oxidative stress in lead and
cadmium toxicity and its amelioration. Vet Med Int 2011:457327
19. Hernandez M, Margalida A (2009) Assessing the risk of lead exposure for the conservation of the endangered Pyrenean bearded vulture
(Gypaetus barbatus) population. Environ Res 109:837842
20. Brust JC (2010) Ethanol and cognition: indirect effects, neurotoxicity
and neuroprotection: a review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 7:
15401557
21. Crews FT, Braun CJ, Hoplight B, Switzer RC 3rd, Knapp DJ (2000)
Binge ethanol consumption causes differential brain damage in young
adolescent rats compared with adult rats. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 24:1712
1723
22. Haorah J, Knipe B, Leibhart J, Ghorpade A, Persidsky Y (2005)
Alcohol-induced oxidative stress in brain endothelial cells causes
bloodbrain barrier dysfunction. J Leukoc Biol 78:12231232
23. Singh AK, Jiang Y, Gupta S, Benlhabib E (2007) Effects of chronic
ethanol drinking on the blood brain barrier and ensuing neuronal
toxicity in alcohol-preferring rats subjected to intraperitoneal LPS
injection. Alcohol Alcohol 42:385399
24. Costa LG, Guizzetti M, Burry M, Oberdoerster J (2002) Developmental
neurotoxicity: do similar phenotypes indicate a common mode of action?
A comparison of fetal alcohol syndrome, toluene embryopathy and
maternal phenylketonuria. Toxicol Lett 127:197205
25. Goodlett CR, Horn KH, Zhou FC (2005) Alcohol teratogenesis:
mechanisms of damage and strategies for intervention. Exp Biol
Med (Maywood) 230:394406
26. Mulholland PJ, Self RL, Stepanyan TD, Little HJ, Littleton JM,
Prendergast MA (2005) Thiamine deficiency in the pathogenesis of
Mol Neurobiol
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.