Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/260085655
DOWNLOADS
VIEWS
59
31
1 AUTHOR:
Carmen Gasparotti
Universitatea Dunarea de Jos Galati
32 PUBLICATIONS 14 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Abstract: Formal safety assessment (FSA) is a structured and systematic methodology, aimed at
enhancing maritime safety by using risk and cost-benefit assessment. Formal safety assessment (FSA)
represents IMOs response to the necessity of a modern approach of the process of establishing
regulations in order to improve safety at sea. Black Sea pollution has now reached an unprecedented
level, the biggest polluter being hydrocarbons. While the level of safety at sea has in general improved in
recent years, accidents still occur and improvements are still desirable. An important role in oil pollution
is played by the offshore and the tanker accidents. The aim of the work proposed herewith is to present
the steps of risk assessment methodology that could be incorporated in the whole process of the FSA.
Risk assessment results stay on base of risk management to the adoption of measures for risk control,
prevention and reduction in operating ships at sea and to the recommendation for decision-making bodies
and regulators to bring risk to the lowest possible level. The best reduce measures of risk are established
based on cost-benefit analysis.
Keywords: formal safety assessment, risk assessment, hazards identification, decision making.
1. INTRODUCERE
Poluarea Mrii Negre a atins n ultimul timp
proporii dramatice. Sursele i cauzele sunt
multiple: evacurile de ape uzate, deeurile
industriale, scurgeri de hidrocarburi din activiti
de foraj i extracie n zonele marine, operaii de
transport, transfer, rafinare i depozitare.
n bazinul Mrii Negre sunt descrcate anual
110 000 tone de petrol, din care cel mai mare
poluator sunt sursele continentale, Dunrea fiind
cel mai mare poluator. El aduce anual 53 000 tone
de petrol n mare, dar i sute de tone de cadmiu,
mercur, plumb, zinc, crom. De asemenea, sunt
1.
INTRODUCTION
RISCULUI
LUAREA
pentru
luarea
deciziilor
va funciona.
2.4. Evaluarea alternativelor de prevenire,
protecie i msuri de atenuare. Analiza costbeneficiu de evaluare a opiunilor
Msurile RCM selectate trebuie s fie, de
asemenea, atractive din punct de vedere al
eficienei costurilor, astfel nct beneficiul obinut
va fi mai mare dect pierderile financiare suferite
ca urmare a adoptrii.
Scopul acestui pas este de a identifica i
compara beneficiile i costurile asociate cu
punerea n aplicare a fiecrei RCO identificate i
definite anterior.
Fiecare opiune potenial de reducere a
riscului este evaluat att din punct de vedere a
contribuiei sale la reducerea riscului ct i din
punct de vedere al beneficiilor opiunii i a
costurile punerii n aplicare. Se efectueaz analiza
cost-beneficiu a opiunilor i, astfel, se decide care
opiune trebuie selectat i pus n aplicare.
Criteriile cost-beneficiu definesc punctul de la
care beneficiile unei opiuni de control a riscurilor
au o pondere mai mare dect costurile sale, i, prin
urmare, arat dac RCO este necesar a face
riscurile " aa de mici nct s devin rezonabil
practicabile" (ALARP). O reprezentare grafic a
principiului ALARP este prezentat n Fig. 4.
Costurile sunt exprimate n termeni de costuri
ale ciclului de via i pot include iniial, costuri de
operare, de formare, de inspecie i certificare, etc.
3. CONCLUZII
REFERENCES
Andreassen E., Kristoffersen L., Spouge J., Torhaug R.,