Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Venkat Viswanathan
April 23, 2015
Key Concepts:
Lagrangian formulation of classical (Newtonian) mechanics, path of minimal action, quantum mechanical amplitude, path integration, Schrdinger
equation, quantum mechanical modes.
Classical Mechanics
Classical mechanics, also called Newtonian mechanics, is based Newtons
laws of motion which govern the motion of macroscopic objects. It allows
a continuous spectrum of energies and a continuous spatial distribution
of matter. Newtons laws of motion are:
1. First Law When viewed in an inertial reference frame, an object
at rest tends to stay at rest and that an object in uniform motion
tends to stay in uniform motion unless acted upon by a net external
force.
2. Second law An applied force F~ on an object equals the time rate of
change of its momentum p~, leading directly to the equation F~ = m~a,
where m is the mass of the object (independent of time), and ~a is the
acceleration.
3. Third law For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction
Various mathematical formulations exist for describing motion of objects in classical mechanics, which are useful in understanding quantum
mechanics. We begin with the Lagrangian formalism, which is based on
the principle of stationary action. The lagrangian, L, of a particle
is defined as the difference between its kinetic energy, T , and potential
energy, V , using generalized coordinates for space, q = (qx , qy , qz , ....),
and time, t, for describing the motion as:
m 2
q V (q, t)
(1)
2
The action, S, is defined as the integral of the lagrangian between
two given instants of time (where q = dq
dt ) as:
L = T V =
t2
S=
L(q,
q, t) dt
(2)
t1
(3)
As the end points are fixed at q1 and q2 , the perturbation has the
condition q1 = q2 = 0. Using the definition of S as in Eq. (2), we
have:
Z
t2
S [q + q ] =
L(q + q,
q + q, t) dt
t1
Z t2
L(q,
q, t) + q
t1
t2
= S [q ] +
q
t1
L
L
+ q
dt
q
q
(4)
L
L
+ q
dt
q
q
t2
S =
t1
Z t2
L
d L L
L
L t2
q
q
+ q
dt = q
dt (5)
q
q
q t1
dt q
q
t1
=0
dt q
q
(6)
d2 q V
=0
dt2
q
(7)
d2 x
d2 x
+ kx = 0 2 + 2 x = 0
2
dt
dt
(9)
q
k
Where = m
is called the characteristic frequency. Considering
x = 0 at t = 0 and x = v = v0 at t = 0, we get the equations describing
the particles motion as:
x(t) = A sin(t) + B cos(t) =
v0
sin(t)
(10)
dx
= v0 cos(t)
(11)
dt
Like the Lagrangian formulation, the Hamiltonian formulation of
classical mechanics describes the the equations of motion, albeit using a
different quantity, H, called the hamiltonian, which is defined as the
sum of the kinetic and potential energies as:
v (t) =
m 2
q + V (q, t)
(12)
2
The hamiltonian of the particle in Example 2, would hence be:
H = T +V =
1
1
1
mv 2 cos2 (t) + 2 v02 sin2 (t) = mv02
(13)
2 0
2
2
Which is independent of time.
From these two simple examples we infer some key conclusions. Classical mechanics predicts particle motion to be deterministic, i.e. the conditions of a particle at a given time will chart out its future trajectory.
The Lagrangian formulation teaches us that particle traverses along a
path that action S to be an extremum. A particle that is free from
the influence of any external potential (and thus forces) will maintain a
constant velocity, as proposed by Newtons first law of motion. Finally,
the motion of a particle in a stationary or time independent potential
will be governed by the constraint of maintaining constant total energy
H = T + V , as described by the Hamiltonian formulation.
H=
Quantum Mechanics
Although classical mechanics is successful when applied for macroscopic
objects, several experimental observations demonstrate the inadequacy
of classical mechanics in treating microscopic phenomena. For example:
1. The Rayleigh-Jeans formula for spectral intensity of black body radiation, which was based on laws of mechanics, electromagnetic theory
and statistical thermodynamics failed for short wavelengths in what
was called as the Ultraviolet Catastrophe. Max Planck later postulated that the oscillating atoms of a black body radiate energy only in
discrete, i.e. quantized amounts which was found to be in agreement
with experimental observations (Fig. 3).
2. The interference patterns that arise from light impinging on a doubleslit experiment, originally done by Young, brought into forefront
the fact that light and matter can display characteristics of both
classically defined waves and particles. Young showed by means of
a diffraction experiment that light behaved as waves. He also proposed that different colors were caused by different wavelengths of
light (Fig. 4).
3. The photoelectric effect, explained by Albert Einstein, which is
the phenomenon of emission of electrons from a metallic surface that
is subjected to electomagnetic radiation. In case light was only a
wave, the energy contained in one of those waves would depend only
on its amplitude, i.e. on the intensity of the light. Other factors, like
the frequency, should make no difference. However, electron emission
was found to occur at a threshold frequency (not intensity) and the
maximum kinetic energy of the emitted electrons was found to depend
on the frequency of the incident light (Fig. 5).
Quantum mechanics shows, that physical processes are not predetermined in a mathematically exact sense. The particle motion is
not restricted to a single path determined by the principle of least
action; instead all the paths, as shown in Fig. 2, have a probability of occurring. We define the probability P (2, 1) of going from
2 = (q2 , t2 ) to 1 = (q1 , t1 ) in terms of a total amplitude K (2, 1), such
that P (2, 1) = |K (2, 1)|2 . Using the previously defined quantity, action S of a particular path, the total amplitude can be considered as
a sum of contributions [q (t)] from each and every path connecting
1 to 2, such that:
X
K (2, 1) =
[q (t)]
(14)
all paths
[q (t)] = C. exp(
12
K [2, 1] = C
exp(
allpaths
2i
S [q (t)]) d[q (t)]
h
(16)
All objects are quantum mechanical in nature, i.e. they traverse along
paths with probabilities dictated by the action S of each path. Macroscopic objects that have comparably large masses have actions which
are large when compared to the quanta of action which is h. Therefore,
macroscopic objects posses only one dominant path which determines
their behavior; this path corresponds to the classical path q as determined by S = 0. While such a formulation smoothly merges into Newtonian mechanics for macroscopic physical processes, it has far reaching
implications on the interpretation of microscopic physical processes.
As discussed before, the amplitude K (2, 1) is related to the probability of going from 1 to 2. To find the probability of locating a particle
at a location q at time t, we define the wave-packet (q, t) to give the
time-dependent probability distribution P (q, t) = |(q, t)|2 . Using the
condition that the probability must be Markovian, we can write:
[ q 2 , t2 ] =
(17)
h (q, t)
h2 2 (q, t)
= 2
+ V (q, t)(q, t)
2i
t
8 m q 2
(18)
This equation is the famous Schrdinger equation that forms the basis
of most of quantum mechanical calculations. Using ~r as the position
vector, the same equation can be expressed in 3 dimensions as:
h (~r, t)
=
2i
t
h2
2
+
V
(
~
r
,
t
)
(~r, t)
8 2 m
(19)
H = E
(20)
(21)
Figure 6: The potential barriers outside the 1-D box are infinitely large,
while the interior of the box has a constant, zero potential.
d2
+ G2 = 0
dx2
Where G2 =
8mE 2
.
h
(23)
= C1 sin(Gx) + C2 cos(Gx)
(24)
8mEn
h2
(25)
This implies:
En =
h2
n2
8mL2
(26)
2
nx
sin(
)
(27)
L
L
One can easily extend this to 3-dimensions, which instead of n would
result in nx , ny , nz . However, what is more important here is to understand the quantization of the energy levels in terms of n. For varying n,
we get different solutions of the Schrdinger equation in 1-dimension, as
shown in Fig. 7.
Next, we look at the quantum-mechanical analogue of the particle in
a harmonic potential field.
n (x) =
n =
Where a4 =
h2
4 2 k
n!2n a
1/2
Hn
x2
exp 2
a
2a
x
(29)
n+
1
2
h
2
(30)