Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(10)
(11)
(12) Levenspiel, O., and Walton, J. S.,Chem. Eng. News, 27, 1999
(1949).
(13) Logwinuk, K., thesis, Cae Institute of Technology, 1948.
(14) Mickley, H. S., and Trilling, C. A,, IXD.EKG.CHEM.,41, 1135
(1949).
(15) Philips Tech. Ret., 11, 91 (1949).
(16) Vreedenberg, H . A , , Conference on Fluidization Technology,
Soc. Chem. Ind. (London), June 1952.
(17) Vreedenberg, H. h., General Discussion on Heat Transfer,
Inst. Mech. Engrs. (London) and Am. Soc. Mech. Engrs.
(1951).
RECEIVED
f o r review January 3, 1953.
Autothermic Processes
Properties and Reactor Design
C. VAN HEERDEN
STAATSMIJNEN IN LIMBURG, GELEEN, THE NETHERLANDS
OF A U T O T H E R M I C PROCESSES
1242
c(T,
- To)
intersection other than 0 (b' in Figure 2). This will occur when
the reaction is too slow or the heat of reaction too small. In that
case autothermic reaction is not possible.
One important property of autothermic reactions can be deduced from Figure 2. Because of the characteristic S-shape of
the heat production curve, the stationary state, S, will lie in the
region of almost complete conversion. This conclusion is in full
agreement with practical experience. For instance, when burning solid fuels the oxygen content of the exit gases is always very
low, and in flames either the fuel or the oxygen is completely consumed, even a t the
limits of flammability.
Stability of Autoreactants
thermic
Practical Reactions.
examples
of autothermic processes are normally
much more complicated than the
7
1Reo;;or
} -
Figure 1.
Simple Diagram
Autotherm io Processes
of
schematic approach
outlined.
Nevertheless, it is possible to draw some general conclusions from the diagram of Figure 2 about the way in which the stable state, represented by S, is effected by a variation in operating conditions,
The most important variable in this respect is the feed rate of
the reactants, If the feed rate is increased, the fractional conversion a t any value of the reaction temperature will decrease.
This means that curve a will shift to the right, while the constant value, approached a t high temperature, will remain the same
(see Figure 3). I n the absence of heat losses to the surroundings,
the slope of the straight line is independent of the feed rate. Thus,
a t a continued increase of the feed rate, curve a will ultimately
arrive at position a'. A t a still further increase a stable equilibrium no longer exists and the reaction cuts out.
and b" and a t a further decrease of the feed rate, the reaction will
be quenched.
Thus it can be understood t h a t for any autothermic process
there exist an upper and a lower limit for the feed rate. Beyond
these limits the reaction cannot proceed autothermically. Because of the rapid change of reaction rate with temperature, these
limits are generally very wide apart, while in the whole region
between these limits the conversion will be almost complete.
A typical example of quenching due to a too low value of the
feed rate is the extinction of a stove when the air is throttled
down too much. The blowoff limit of flames is an example of the
upper limit of feed rate.
Dilution of the reactants with-some inert component has an
effect similar to the reduction of the feed rate. If it is remembered that all heat quantities in Figures 2 and 3 are taken per
gram mole of one of the reactants, it is clear that the slope of the
heat consumption line increases proportionally with the degree of
dilution.
If it is assumed that the reaction is of the first order, the acurve will not change for a given value of the residence time.
Thus it follows that there is an upper limit of dilution above which
the reaction is quenched. Examples of this phenomenon are the
limits of flammability of a mixture of air and, say, methane.
Here too, the conversion between the limits is almost completein poor flames the conversion of the methane fuel, in rich flames
that of the oxygen.
f
//
Tr
Figure 3.
1243
@?\.g
~~
.O n
55
:g
CL"
c
0
7z
L
TO
Figure 4.
which means that the heat content of the outlet gases above the
inlet tempkrature equals the heat of reaction produced in the
column. This is approximately equivalent to the statement that
the temperature difference between inlet and outlet gases is proportional to the fractional conversion.
To facilitate the calculations, the following assumptions are
made:
1. There is no temperature difference between the catalyst
granules and the interstitial gas.
2. The temperature in the catalyst bed is constant in any
cross section of the converter.
3. As a consequence of the second assumption, the rate of
heat exchange between the ascending and descending currents of
gas is represented by an over-all heat transfer coefficient, U ,
which is constant throughout the converter. In the following
calculations this rate of heat exchange will be expressed in terms
C
of the height of transfer unit, H = 7 ,where C is the feed rate
Ila
expressed as heat capacity per unit time and a is the total heat
exchanging surface per unit of length of the converter.
4. The heat capacity of the gas is independent of temperature
and conversion; the temperature rise, 7, of the reacting gas
corresponding to the adiabatic formation of 1% of ammonia is
constant and equals 15" C.
5. The reaction velocity satisfies the well-known relation of
Temkin ( 2 ) .
ture but also decreases the reaction yield. Thus, for those processes where this slope can be varied-for instance, by a variation
of the degree of heat exchange between outlet and inlet-it is
advantageous to choose the conditions such that the slope of b is
as great as possible (b' in Figure 4). Under these conditions, at
the limit of stability the conversion will reach its maximum.
This important point will be discussed more fully in the next section, which deals with the calculation of ammonia synthesis
converters.
catalyst bed
heat
tubes
exchanger
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
1244
inlet
Figure 5.
where I< is the equilibrium constant and IC the temperature-dependent rate constant. After some modifications, substituting
a nitrogen to hydrogen ratio of 1 to 3 and the temperature dependency of k , this relation can be written as:
dz
2.4 X 1012
= F(2,
T)=
+ z)(l
P-3/*(1
20,000
-_
_ X
- z)'&
T,,O C.
0.02
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
950
760
650
590
540
T,,
c.
To.l,O C.
840
680
580
530
490
-L
T , for
500
420
370
340
320
Mole
Fraction/M.
1.6
0.23
0 048
0 017
0.007
Tl = To when x =
\Y
- at
dx
some values of z :
T2 = T I when x = 0
Outlet
dz
(4)
(5)
When solving such a problem by the method of stepwise integration, one starts a t one end of the column with given values of T I ,
TB,and z and integrates step by step until the other end is reached.
For the present problem this procedure is not possible, as the two
boundary conditions (Equations 4 and 5) are given a t different
ends of the column. Thus for x = L,z or Tz is unknown. For
2 = 0, temperature Tt ( T I = T 2 )a t the top of the column is unknown.
This difficulty was solved in the following way: Starting from
an arbitrary value of the top temperature, T t , at x = 0, the stepwise integration was carried out until x = L. It is clear that this
arbitrary choice will not lead t o the correct value TOof T I (2)at
x = L. The integration is repeated for a number of different
values of T,,and in this way the temperature difference between
the ends of the heat exchanger tubes, T 2 T I ( L ) = 9,as found
by stepwise integration, is calculated as a function of Tt.
The relation found is represented by curve a in Figure 7 and
the general shape of the curve can be understood easily.
9 6oo.
I
I
400.
(3)
June 1953
Tt P U
1245
inlet percentage of 1.5% of ammonia, the equilibrium temperature equals 1080' C. Thus, in all calculated curves like t h a t in
Figure 7, 0 is zero for Tg = 1080" C. In the region between low
temperature where the reaction rate is practically zero and the
equilibrium temperature where the reaction rate becomes zero
again, the 0, Tt curves will show a maximum. For those points of
the $-curve which satisfy the condition 0 = Tt - Tothe corresponding solutions satisfy the boundary condition of Equation 5 .
This means t h a t curve a in Figure 7 must be intersected by
straight line b. The diagram of Figure 7 is then equivalent to t h e
diagram of Figure 4. Point of intersection 0 corresponds with
the nonreacting state, 1 with the state of ignition, and S with the
steady reaction state.
9 M ~
700
OJ
0
If 0 is multiplied by the heat capacity of the feed the equivalence between the diagram of Figure 7 and Figure 4 becomes more
direct. Yet the a-curve in Figure 7 does not correspond with the
heat of reaction, as it does in Figure 4, but with the heat transferred from the reaction space to the heat exchanging tubes.
Generally, it can be said that any specified problem will have its
own diagram, depending on the way in which the integration of
the differential equations is carried out. Such a diagram will
always consist of a n a-curve, giving some heat quantity determined by the reaction rate function and a b-curve, giving some
heat quantity determined by the boundary conditions, both as
functions of some reference temperature.
In Figure 8 the complete temperature and concentration distribution is given corresponding to the steady state, S, in Figure 7.
Moreover, the variation of the equilibrium temperature throughout the converter is given. From this figure it is clear that the
converter owes its stability to the fact t h a t for an important part
the reaction proceeds in the direct vicinity of chemical equilibrium, where (between points P and &) the reaction rate has a
negative temperature coefficient.
The complete calculation was repeated for higher values of the
H.T.U.-that is, for lower values of the heat exchanging capacity
of the converter. The resulting a-curves for H
6 and 7.5
meters are also given in Figure 7. 4 t H = 7.5 meters the limit of
1246
01
0
4
6
8
1
Distance from top (m)
c;
-,Ua C
V , and U
d.8,
this aa-
1000.
length of column
f7 I
800
""I
c
Ua
\\\
1 N~ + 3 H* + N H ~
2
reaction rate constant
height of column, m.
total pressure, atm.
quantity of heat produced, respectively, consumed per gram mole
of one of the reactants
Tt 1%)
U = over-all heat transfer coefficient
Figure 10. Relation between 6 and Tt for Different Values of Catalyst
5
= distance from the top of the colActivity
umn, m.
= linear gas velocity in empty catalyst
u
vessel, m./sec.
z
= mole fraction of ammonia, dimensionless
Thus the four curves of Figure 10 also apply by approximation to
0 16
= F(z, T ) = modified reaction rate function, m.-l
the conditions f = 1 and v = - meters per second. Again in
f
T = temperature, O C.
agreement with practice, it follows that a n increase in the gas
To = inlet temperature of reactants
velocity necessitates a n increase in the heat exchanging capacity
TI = temperature in heat exchanger tubes
T z = temperature in catalyst bed
and, consequently, operation at a higher temperature level.
T I = equilibrium temperature
T , = temperature of maximum reaction rate
CONCLUSION
To.r = temperature (<T,) where the reaction rate = 0.1 X
maximum rate
The elaborate calculations on the ammonia synthesis converT , = temperature of isothermal reactor
ters have proved t h a t the special features of this autothermic
T , = temperature of isothermal reactor at the steady
reaction state
process can be understood completely from the diagrams given in
Tt = temperature at the top of the column
Figures 7 and 10. Moreover, it is clear t h a t for practical calculaTi = ignition temperature
tions of this k i d these diagrams are indispensable. T h a t the
T
= temperature rise of synthesis gas at the adiabatic
results of these calculations are also in quantitative agreement
formation of 1% of NH, ( T = 15' C.)
iy
= temperature difference between top of the column
with practice is only a confirmation of the reliability of the reacand gas inlet
tion velocity relation of Temkin and of the correctness of the
H.T.U. values used.
LITERATURE C I T E D
It is remarkable that the elementary considerations given in
(1) Loon, W. van, dissertation, Delft, 1952.
this paper, which are essential for a right understanding of all
(2) Temkin, M., and Pyzhev, Y., Acta Physicochim. U.R.S.S., 12,
autothermic processes, have not been presented before.
327 (1940).
Another very important application of the principles involved
can be found in the combustion and gasification of solid fuels in
ACCEPTED
March 30, 1953.
RECEIVED
for review January 3, 1953.
k
=
L =
P =
QP,,=
AND
R O B E R T L. P I O F O R D
It is possible t o choose as the reacting component in the 901vent a material whose speed of reaction with the solute is so
rapid t h a t the chemical solvent is completely depleted a t the
gas-liquid interface. I n this case, the mass transfer is increased
in a manner different from the gas-phase effect mentioned above.
While pure physical absorption occurs in the liquid near the interface as usual, the liquid-phase resistance is decreased, owing t o
the increased concentration gradient a s a result of the rapid liquidphase reaction.
Finally, it is often most advantageous to employ a reversible
1247