Professional Documents
Culture Documents
* Chevron U S .A.,
J. R. M A R K E L L O * and J. F. R E A D ?
Inc. and t Department of Geological Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institiitc
and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24601, U.S.A.
ABSTRACT
The Nolichucky Formation (0-300 m thick) formed on the Cambrian pericratonic shelf i n a shallow
intrashelf basin bordered along strike and toward the regional shelf edge by shallow water carbonates
and by nearshore clastics toward the craton. Lateral facies changes from shallow basinal rocks to
peritidal carbonates suggest that the intrashelf basin was bordered by a gently sloping carbonate ramp.
Peritidal facies of the regional shelf are cyclic, upward-shallowing stromatolitic carbonates. These
grade toward the intrashelf basin into shallow ramp, cross-bedded, ooid and oncolitic, intraclast grainstones that pass downslope i n t o deeper ramp, subwave base, ribbon carbonates and thin limestone
conglomerate. Ribbon limestones are layers and lenses of trilobite packstone, parallel and wave-ripplelaminated, quartzose calcisiltite, and lime mudstone arranged in storm-generated, fining upward
sequences (1-5 cm thick) that may be burrowed. Shallow basin facies are storm generated, upward
coarsening and upward fining sequences of green, calcareous shale with open marine biota; parallel to
hummocky laminated calcareous siltstone; and intraformational flat pebble conglomerate. There are
also rare debris-flow paraconglomerate (10-60 cm thick) and shaly packstone/wackestone with trace
fossils, glauconite horizons and erosional surfaces/hardgrounds. A 15-m thick tongue of cyclic carbonates within the shale package contains subtidal digitate algal bioherins which devcloped during
a period of shoaling in the basin.
Understanding the Nolichucky facies within a ramp to intrashelf basin model provides a framework
for understanding similar facies which are widely distributed in the Lower Palaeozoic elsewhere. The
study demonstrates the widespread effects of storm processes on pericratonic shelf sedimentation.
Finally, recognition of shallow basins located on pericratonic shelves is important because such basins
influence the distribution of facies and reservoir rocks, whose trends may be unrelated to rcgional
shelf-edge trends.
INTRODUCTION
The major aim of this paper is to describe a carbonate r a m p t o shallow basin transition associated
with a n intrashelf depression on a pericratonic platform. Particular emphasis is placed on the description
o f the facies and possible processes (especially storinrelated types) involved in their formation.
The Late Cambrian Nolichucky Formation and
time-equivalent rocks in the Appalachian Valley and
Ridge Province of Virginia developed o n the regional
carbonate shelf o r Appalachian miogeocline (Palmer,
1971a; Williams, 1978) within and peripheral to a
shallow basin upon the shelf (Fig. I).The regional
0037-0746/8 1/OSOO-0573 $02.00
ic)
5 74
NEARSHORE
C L A S T I C S OF
PRECAMBRIAN/
C A M B R I A N ARC
NOLICHUCKY
INTRASHELF
BASIN
PELITIC
F A C I E S OF
PIEDMONT
200 KMS
STRATIGRAPHIC SETTING
NW
Copper l i i d g e ~ ~ o n o c o c l i c a g u Formations,
e
330520 m thick (Rodgcrs, 1953; Harris, 1964) (Fig. 2).
The Honaker Dolomite (300-350 ni thick) contains stromatolitic dolomites and a massive upper
unit of oolitic dolomite 20-30 in thick (Fig. 2). The
Elbrook Formation is up to 520 ni thick, and consists
of cyclic stromatolitic limestone and dolomite units
overlain by oolitic dolomite (30-40 m thick), and a n
upper member, the Widener Limestone (46 m thick)
composed of ribbon rock and ooid and intraclast
limestones (Fig. 2).
The Upper Cambrian (Franconian and Trempealeauan) Conococheague and Copper Ridge Forma-
A'
B'
,,
~
/
f
100
KM
PALINSPASTIC BASE
B'
0RIBBON ROCK
LIMESTONE
A'
OOlD PACKSTONE
x x
wy
??
GLAUCONITE
HARDGROUNDS
SEOIMENTARY DIKES
TRILOBITE ZONAL
BOUNDARIES
Fig. 2. Nolichucky Formation stratigraphy, regional cross-sections. A palinspastic base map modified from Dennison
RC Woodward (1963) and Dennison (1970) was used to construct stratigraphic cross-sections, and palaeogeographic
maps. Inset map of south-west Virginia (palinspastic base) shows locations of cross-sections. AA' is normal to the
regional shelf trend, BB' is parallel to the shelf trend. Vertical arrows represent measured sections. Dotted lines on crosssections are trilobite zonal boundaries (Derby, 1965); from base to top, zones are Bolaspidellu, Ceduriu, Crepicephalus
and Aphelurpis.
576
STAGE
STAGE
2 NOLICHUCKV
STAGf
MIDDLE L S I MfMBER
[EARLY CREPICEPHALUSI
Fig. 3. Geographicdistribution of Upper Cambrian lithofacies in Virginia during three phases of Nolichucky deposition.
to the south-east (Fig. 2) and consists of cyclic, flatpebble conglomerate, oolitic and stromatolitic limestone and dolomite, and minor quartz sandstone.
The Copper Ridge Formation (up to 330 m thick) is
the north-western equivalent of the Conococheague
Formation (Fig. 2 ) and consists of stromatolitic and
oolitic dolomite with minor quartz sandstone.
The Nolichucky Formation contains five members
(Fig. 2):
\
LLOW SUBTIDAL
FAIR W E A T H E R WAVE B A S
TOP
MaynardviffeLimestone4 > 50 m thick; limestone-dolomite ribbon rock, and minor oolitic,
intraclast and stromatolitic carbonates.
Upper Shale Member--0-56 m thick, shale, siltstone, interbedded skeletal and pellet limestone
and limestone conglomerate.
Middle Limestone M e m b e r 4 - 2 0 m thick, cyclic
shaly limestone and algal bioherms.
Lower Shale M e m b e r 4 1 2 5 m thick; lithologically similar to Upper Shale Member.
Lower Limestone Member (or Maryville Limestone, usually mapped separately from the
Nolichucky Formation)4-77 m thick; limestone-dolomite ribbon rock, ooid, intraclast
and pellet limestones that pass up into shaly
pellet, skeletal and conglomerate limestone.
Base
The Nolichucky and adjacent formations (Fig. 2)
contain four lithofacies suites which make up the
ramp-to-basin transition. These are: ( 1 ) cyclic carbonates (Elbrook-Honaker, Conococheague-Copper
Ridge Formations and Nolichucky Middle Limestone); (2) ooid and oncolitic carbonates of the
shallow ramp (Upper Honaker-Elbrook, and part
of the Maryville and Nolichucky Lower and Middle
Limestones); (3) ribbon carbonates of the deeper
ramp (Maryville Limestone, Nolichucky Lower
Limestone and Lower Shale, the Elbrook Widener
Limestone Member, and the Maynardville Limestone) and; (4) shale facies of the intrashelf basin
(Nolichucky Lower and Upper Shale). The geographic distribution of facies during several phases
of NoIichucky deposition are illustrated in Fig. 3.
Inferred lateral facies relations are shown in Fig. 4
and lithofacies are summarized in Table 1.
Cyclic platform carbonates (Table I ) of the ElbrookHonaker and Copper Ridge-Conococheague Formations occur adjacent to Maryville and Maynardville
oolitic and ribbon carbonates (Fig. 2). The ElbrookHonaker beds are partly time equivalent to Nolichucky strata (Figs 2 and 3). Copper Ridge-Conococheague rocks that overlie Nolichucky beds have
grossly similar cycles to those of the ElbrookHonaker Formations, with occasional quartz-rich
units at tops of cycles. The cycles are generally 1-5 m
Bedding and
structures
Biota
Diagenesis
Regionally extensive
cycles; mainly sheet-like
units; bioherms range
from discrete columns to
coalescent structures;
conglomerates. Form thin
sheets and lenses
Geometry and
thickness
Shale, calcareous
quartz siltstone, 1st.
conglomerate and
skeletal 1st.. arranged
in upward-coarsening
and upward-fining
sequences (up to 4 m
thick)
Lithologies
Nolichucky, lower
and upper shale
members
Shale facies
facies
Intrashelf basin
Occurrence
Environment
Ribbon rocks of
Maynardville, Maryville, Nolichurchy
lower 1st
Thin ooid grst. and
oncolite intraclast
grst/wkst
Thin ooid/oncolite
grainstone
Peritidal carbonate
platform
Cyclic stromatolitic
facies
Early dolomitization Of
upper parts of cycles. Late
dolomitization of basal
parts of cycles
Elbrook-Honaker
Shallow-ramp sand
shoals
Thick units of
ooid grainstone
Sheets up to 40 m thick,
10 to 100 km wide, peripheral t o embayment
Maryville, Nolichucky
lower Ist., middle 1st. and
Maynardville 1st
Deep ramp
578
Interpretation
Thick ooid grainstones (and oncolite intraclast grainstones) are interpreted as transgressive lime sand
sheets, bars or beach ridges that form on the shallow
ramp between tidal-flat, cyclic carbonates and subtidal fine-grained ribbon limestone and shales (described later). Similar up-dip lime sands have been
described from the Holocene of the Persian Gulf
(Loreau & Purser, 1973), the Yucatan Shelf (Logan
eta/., 1969), and Shark Bay (Hagan & Logan, 1974),
and the Jurassic ramp of Texas and Alabama (Ahr,
1973). The 20-40 m thick Elbrook-Honaker dolomitized ooid grainstone resembles facies of modern
ooid shoals (to 5 n i depth) which contain rippled and
megarippled sediments, are commonly unburrowed,
and composed of small ooids (less than 0.5 mm),
minor skeletal debris, pellets and fibrous cements
(Ball, 1967: Loreau &Purser, 1973; Hine, 1977).The
thick ooid units formed where the ooid lithotope
occupied the same geographic position for a long
period of time (i.e. rate of sedimentation equalled
MARYVILLE LIMESTONE
THRUST
'1
579
LOWER
LIMESTONE
MEMBER
WIDENER
LIMESTONE
MAVNAROVILLE
LIMESTONE
3.
'
CRYPTALGALAMINITE
OIGITATE/THROMBOLITE STROMATOLITE
NW
9.
5
SE
0010 GRAINSTONE
0NCOLITE;INTRACLAST
GRAINSTONE
~~
CONGLOMERATE
RIBBON ROCK
SHALE
COVERED INTERVAL
Fig. 5. Columnar sections: ribbon rock and grainstone sequences. Sections I , 2, Maryville Limestone; Section 3,
Nolichucky Lower Limestone Member; Section 4, Widener Limestone; Section 5 , Maynardville Limcslonc. Sections
are located on stratigraphic cross-section (insel).
37
$ I I ) 2s
580
Fig. 6. Ooid and oncolite carbonate rocks of the shallow ramp. (A) Photomicrograph of ooid grainstone, Maryville
Limestone. (B) Photomicrograph of cross-laminated oncolite intraclast grainstone. Note oncolites (arrows) with dark
Renulris in cores and lighter outer coats of Girvnnelh. (C) Photomicrograph of oncolite packstone/wackestone. Note
erosion surfaces (arrows) and doloniitiLed oncolite (D).
58 1
Inrerpretatiori
Thin ooid grainstone and interbedded oncoliteintraclast grainstones are similar to modern ooid and
intraclastic sand ribbons and shoals (0-3 m deep)
on high-energy sublittoral platforms (Hagan &
Logan, 1974), in that sediments have well-defined
layering, hardgrounds, small ooids (average 0.3 niin
diameter), reworked ooid and skeletal grains, intraclasts of ooid grainstone and skeletal limestone, and
calcareous algae attached to clasts.
Some oncolite intraclast sands interbedded with
fine-grained ribbon limestones, and which contain
marine fibrous cement, interstitial mud/micrite
cement and asymmetric oncolite coats of algal intraclasts, may have formed in slightly deeper parts of,
or peripheral to active shoals (cf. Hine, 1977). Alternating coarse and fine layers, basal erosional surfaces
with oncolitic and intraclastic lags and rotated
asynimetric oncolites mixed with concentrically
coated oncolites, suggest that these sediments were
intermittently reworked during storms. Cornnion
fibrous cements in the Cambrian lime sands indicate
submarine lithification of sands that were immobile
for long periods (Ball, 1967; Shim, 1969; Hagan &
Logan, 1974). Periodic reworking of these formed
intraclasts. Some Reriulcis algal clasts formed in place
by encrustation of skeletal grains, but others may be
boundstone fragments transported from shallow
water biohernis.
R I B B O N C A R B O N A T E FACIES O F T H E
DEEPER RAMP
Ribbon carbonate facies make up parts of the Maryville Limestone, Nolichucky Lower Limestone and
Widener Limestone, are common in the Nolichucky
Lower Shale and Middle Limestone Meiiibel-s, and
comprise the Maynardville Limestone (Figs 2 and 5 ) .
They onlap Elbrook -Honaker grainstone and stromatolitic carbonates to the south-east and north-east,
and interfinger with and underlie Nolichucky shale
facies to the north-west and south-west (Figs 2
and 5). They also overlie Nolichucky shales and interfinger with and underlie Conococheague and Copper
Ridge Formation stromatolitic carbonates (Fig. 2).
The ribbon carbonates occur in sequences u p to
40 ni thick, interbedded with ooid and oncolite grainstone, carbonate conglomerate and shale (Fig. 5).
Stromatolitic carbonates are locally associated with
Maynardville ribbon facies (Fig. 5). The ribbon carbonates (Fig. 8A) consist of nodular skeletal limestones, fining-upward layers (skeletal limestonepellet limestone-lime mudstone) and dolomottled
layers, that form a gradational sequence from undisturbed primary sedimentation units to burrowhomogenized units. Regionally correlative glauconitic beds and hardgrounds (Fig. 2) occur in the
ribbon rocks, and parallel regional ooid packstone
sheets and biostratigraphic zonal boundaries of
Derby (1965).
Skeletal limestones of ribbon carbonates
582
Fig. 7. Skeletal limestone lithofacies of the deeper ramp. (A) Photomicrograph of close-spaced, micrite-cemented
hardgrounds in packstone. (B) Photomicrograph of hardground that truncates grains and cement in grainstone. Dark
grains are glauconite. (C) Photomicrograph of multigeneration cl st (arrow) with four erosion sufaces. (D) Photomicrograph of in-place, upward branching Renulcis colonies (arrow ) encrusting intracIast. Note hardground near top
of picture (H).
Interpretation
Compaction and pressure solution have played a n
important role in the development of ribbon rock
fabrics in which argillaceous dolomite seams contain
close-packed stylolites. Burrows, argillaceous laminae, and lime mudstone layers are common loci for
pressure solution and dolomitization. Similar fabrics
interpreted as the products of pressure solution and
dolomitization have been described by Logan &
Semeniuk (1976) and Wanless (1979). However,
583
Interpretation
Fining-upward sequences
Fining-upward layers in the ribbon rocks are interpreted as storm-reworked, deeper-ramp carbonates
that formed below normal wave base. This is indicated by the strafigraphic position of the ribbon rocks
between shallow-ramp ooid grainstones and intrashelf basin shales, by the lack of features indicative
of exposure, and by the similarity of the finingupward sequences to ancient storm deposits described
by Brenner & Davies (1973), Bowen, Rhoads &
McAlester (1974, p. 96, fig. 4), Ager (1974), Kelling
& Mullin (1975), DeRaaf, Boersma & van Gelder
(1977) and Kreisa (1979). All these occur in subtidal settings adjacent to or interbedded with shales
and other fine sediments, have basal erosion/scour
surfaces, skeletal concentrations, parallel and smallscale hummocky lamination and mud caps.
Such fining-upward layers are generated by erosion
and redeposition of sediments during and following
storms. Basal erosion surfaces form as high-energy
storm waves scour and suspend bottom sediments,
and redeposit winnowed material as storm lags
(Brenner & Davies, 1973; Bowen et al., 1974; Kreisa,
1979), whereas the calcisiltites and their lamination
types form under waning storm-energy conditions as
suspended fines settle from suspension (Reineck &
Singh, 1972; Harms eta/., 1975; Hamblin &Walker,
1979; Kreisa, 1979).
The transition from parallel t o hummocky and
wave-ripple cross-lamination within the calcisiltites
may relate to waning energy conditions. The parallellaminated calcisiltites may form above basal scours/
shell lags by deposition from storm-generated density
currenls while storm water levels are still high
(Hamblin &Walker, 1979); by suspension deposition
of storm-suspended sediment under the influence of
wave-, tide- or wind-driven currents (Reineck &
Singh, 1972); and/or by deposition of sediment under
584
585
147
MO
145
SKELETAL LIMESTONE
MAYNARDVILLE
CONGLOMERATE
CALCAREOUS SILTSTONE
/PELLETAL CALClSlLTlTE
0
-SHALE
141
139
MARYVILLE
anz
-SCOUR
BASE
GLAUCONITE
Fig. 9. Columnar sections : shale-siltstone-conglomerate sequences, Nolichucky Lower and Upper Shale Members.
Positions and widths of arrow stems at index column represent stratigraphic locations and thickness of shale intervals
magnified in adjacent columns.
decreased during storm dissipation. Finally, waveripple cross-lamination forms as a traction lamination, commonly produced by oscillatory waves associated with tidal currents (Harms et a/., 1975) and
probably reflects lower suspended load in the water
column, lower currents (Allen, 1970, p. 170) and
possibly decreased water depths, than the planar and
hummocky types.
Lime mudstone and argillaceous dolomite caps of
fining-up sequences are low-energy suspension
deposits formed by deposition of storm-suspended
fine sediment (Bowen et a/., 1974; DeRaaf et al.,
1977; and Kreisa, 1979), and accumulation of fines
either generated in situ o r carried on to the deeper
ramp between storms. The common occurrence of
lime mud layers overlain by argillaceous dolomite
caps may result from settling of lime mud before
platy, lower density clay minerals. It may also be
caused by influx of terrigenous fines on to the deeper
ramp during and following storms, when rivers in
flood debouched into the basin.
Fig. 8. Ribbon rock lithofacies. (A) Outcrop photograph of ribbon rock (light layers are limestones; dark layers are
dolomitic). (B) Polished slab of fining-upward sequences. Scale in millimetres. (C) Photomicrograph of fining-upward
sequences showing basal scours (arrows), skeletel packstones and dolomitized mud caps (dark). 1 cm bar scale on left.
(D) Photomicrograph of lamination in pellet limestones of fining-upward sequences. Note erosional boundary at base
of upper set (arrow). (E) Photomicrograph of burrowed lime mudstone. Note geopetal filling of burrows with sediment
and cement. (F) Polished slab of dolomottled ribbon rock.
586
J . R . Markcllo a i d J . F. Rcad
Shale facies of the Nolichucky Formation are interpreted as shallow basin facies formed below normal
wave base because they are stratigraphically furthest
from peritidal facies, are enclosed by subtidal ribbon
rocks, are fine grained, and lack features suggestive
of shallow-water deposition or emergence. These
facies are similar to shale sequences from intrashelf
basins in the Cambrian (Aitken, 1978) and Mesozoic
(Eliuk, 1978). Depositional slopes were very low,
indicated by horizontal regional time markers (zonal
boundaries, glauconite and hardground horizonr,
ooid packstone sheets, sedimentary dike layers and
Middle Limestone Member; Fig. 2), and by the
general lack of turbidites, slump structures and intraformational truncation surfaces which are associated
with steeper platform margins. Estimates of water
depths during deposition of shale lithofacies range
from a few metres (estimated from Middle Limestone
upward-shallowing cycles containing basal shales)
to a few tens of metres (estimated from thickness
of the Upper Shale/Maynardville Limestone
587
Fig. 10. Shale and siltstone lithofacies. (A) Cutcrop photograph of Nolichucky shale and interbedded siltstone. Staff
(bottom centre) is 1.5 m long. (B) Outcrop photograph of small compacted sedimentary dyke in shale. (C) Polished slab
photograph of planar to hummocky laminated siltstone. Scale in cenlimetres.
1.
Iiiterpretatioii
These occur as 1-10 cm thick beds (Fig. IOC) in 0.32 m thick siltstone intervals of coarsening-upward
sequences (Figs 9 and 10A). Siltstones are sharp
based, thinly laminated with shale partings and, in
coarsening-upward sequences, siltstone beds thicken
and shale partings thin upward. Locally, siltstones
have thin conglomerate interbeds.
Siltstone beds (Fig. 1OC) contain parallel, hummocky and rare wave-ripple lamination (1-2 cm
amplitude, 10-30 cm wavelength). Single beds may
consist of one lamination set or of several sets separated by basal erosion surfaces. Laminae are 1-3 mni
thick, continuous, parallel, basal erosion surfaces
thicken over crests of hummocks and thin into
troughs. Parallel lamination, the most abundant
lamination type, comprises complete siltstone beds
o r occurs in lower parts of beds and grades u p into
hummocky lamination. Wave-ripple lamination is
589
590
Fig. 1I . Limestone conglomerate lithofacies. All photographs are of polished slabs and all scales in centimetres.
(A) Slab of conglomerate that overlies limestone. Note edgewise and fanned orientation of some clasts, and platy clast
shapes. (3) Conglomerate with multigeneration clasts of pellet liniestone/skeletal packstone (M). Note burrows preserved
in clasts (B). (C) Slab ofconglomerate (20 cm thick) that is enclosed i n shale and occurs north-west (basinward) ofshallowramp, thick, ooid grainstones. It contains large multigeneration conglomerate clasts(M), and sediments of oolitic skeletal
sand. (D) Slab of paraconglomerate with lime mudstone clasts i n shaly lime mud matrix.
by compaction, and V-shaped brittle fractures are
filled by inter-clast sediment o r cement.
Inter-clast sediment ranges from lime mudstone to
grainstone, but in most conglomerates is skeletal
intraclast packstone composed of poorly sorted,
rounded to angular, skeletal material (trilobites,
echinoderms, phosphatic brachiopods, and rare
sponge spicules), intraclasts, lime mud, rare ooids,
glauconite, quartz silt, and columnar and equant
calcite cement. Inter-clast lime mud is commonly
dolomitized and locally is iron oxide stained.
Rare mud-supported paraconglomerates (up to
45 c m thick) occur in the Upper Shale Member
5-10 m above the Middle Limestone Member, where
they are enclosed in thick shales and are associated
with compacted sedimentary dikes. These conglomerates have planar scoured bases overlain by thin
basal laycrs of coarse skeletal packstone, and grade
into overlying shales. They consist of unoriented,
unsorted, poorly rounded t o angular clasts of bur-
rowed lime mudstone, lesser laminated pellet limestone, and skeletal wackestone in lime mud matrix
(Fig. 1 1 D).
Inteupretatioii
59 I
592
Interpret ation
Ooid packstone
Fig. 12. Ooid packstone facies of the intrashelf basin. (A)Ooid packstone, Middle Limestone Member. Note megarippled
top overlain by shale and the centimetre scale (arrow). (3)Photomicrograph of ooid packstone with sediment-filled
bedding plane parting (arrows) that separates cemented ooid packstone beds. Coarse crystalline ooids are dolomitized.
( C ) Photomicrograph of ooid packstone; platy ooid nuclei are mainly trilobite fragments.
Interpretation
Ooid packstones are interpreted on the basis of
stratigraphic setting as subtidal sand sheets that
accumulated in shallow basin settings, s-award of
nearshore grainstone shoals and deeper-ramp, ribbon
carbonate environments. The ooid packstones differ
from the other ooid sediments in that they occur in
extensive thin sheets overlain by shales, have preserved megarippled bedding surfaces, and are packstones with large ooids (1-4 mm) with pronounced
radial fabrics, open marine fossil asemblages and
glauconite.
Holocene oolitic sediments similar to Nolichucky
ooid packstones are forming in protected Persian
Gulf lagoons where ooids are moved only during
storms, and sustained low-energy periods allow for
precipitation of thick radial oolitic cortexes (Loreau
& Purser, 1973). Similar ooid packstones occur in
intrashelf basin shale facies of the Mesozoic shelf,
Canada, where they also have pronounced radial
fabrics (Eliuk, 1978) and in the Cambrian inshore
basin facies of Canada (Aitken, 1978). The radial
fabrics may be partly diagenetic, although they
probably reflect primary radial fabrics that were
either aragonitic or high Mg calcite. Megaripple
bedforms on subwave base oolitic sediments are
generated during periodic high tides and large storms,
and are preserved because of the subwave base setting
and possible stabilization of sediments by subtidal
algal films (Bathurst, 1975).
593
C O M P A R I S O N WITH OTHER
INTRASHELF B A S I N SEQUENCES
The Nolichucky intrashelf basin has facies that are
similar to those in intrashelf basins in the Cambrian
of the United States and Canada (Palmer, 1971b;
Aitken, 1978) and the Mesozoic of Canada (Eliuk,
1978). They are bordered toward the regional shelf
edge by shallow-water carbonate platforms that
periodically shoaled to tidal levels. Consequently
these rimming platforms commonly have interbeds
of carbonate tidal flat facies. Width of the rimming
platform for the Appalachians is not known. However, rimming platforms may have ranged from 20
to 400 km wide in the Cambrian of Western Canada
(Aitken, 1978), and up to 30 km wide in the Mesozoic
of eastern Canada (Eliuk, 1978).
Inshore basins may be extremely large. Aitken
(1978) suggests the Cambrian basin of Western
Canada was 1900 km long by 700-1 10 km wide. In
the Appalachians, the basin may have been 800 km
long by 300-400 km wide. The Mesozoic intrashelf
basin in eastern Canada appears to be smaller
(500 km long by 70 km wide; Eliuk, 1978).
Slopes into the intrashelf basins appear to be low,
probably of the order of a few metres per kilometre.
Consequently, facies transitions from the platform
into the basin are typically ramp-like and lack the
turbidites and megabreccias that seem to characterize
steep shelf edges. Instead, the facies grade from lime
sands into muddy carbonates and then into shale
sequences. An important feature associated with the
transition is that thick ooid grainstone bodies may
be located irnmediately.behind the rimming platform.
lntrashelf basins appear to be bordered toward the
craton by nearshore clastics which are locally introduced via delta-systems and redistributed by marine
currents. Intrashelf basin fills common:y are olivegreen shale, calcisiltite, quartz siltstone, open marine
skeletal limestone and locally, radial-ooid packstone.
Flat pebble conglomerates, glauconite and hardgrounds are common, particularly in the Cambrian
examples. Finally, and of great importance, is that
basin fills appear to be dominantly subtidal facies
that may have formed below fair weather wave base.
CONCLUSIONS
( I ) Upper Cambrian (Dresbachian) facies of the
Nolichucky and adjacent formations accumulated
within and peripheral to a shallow intrashelf basin on
594
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This paper is based on an M.S. Thesis by J. R.
Markello, under the supervision of J. F. Read.
Thanks are given to W. D. Lowry, C. G . Tillman,
George A. Grover, Jr, Ronald D. Kreisa and J. D.
Aitken for helpful discussion and for ci-itical review
of the manuscript. Technical assistance was provided
by Bryan Roberts and Greg Lumpkin (field work),
by Sharon Chiang, Martin Eiss and Carol Markello
(drafting), by Sue Bruce and Gordon Love (photography), and by Susan Roth and Donna Williams
(typing). Financial assistance was provided by Earth
Sciencss Section, Nat ional Science Foundation grants
DES 75-15015 andEAR75-15015 to J. F. Read,and
by grants from the Department of Geological Sciences,
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University;
a Grant-in-Aid of Research from Sigma Xi, the
Scientific Research Society of North America; and a
Grant-in-Aid from the American Association of
Petroleum Geologists. The senior writer wishes to express much appreciation to his wife, Carol, who
aided in preparation of illustrations and provided
abundant emotional support throughout the project.
REFERENCES
AGER,D.V. (1974) Storm deposits in the Jurassic of
the Moroccan High Atlas. Pulueogeogr. Pulueoclirii.
Pulueoccol. 15, 83.~93.
595
596
JAMES,
N.P. (1977) Facies model 8. Shallowing-upward
sequences in carbonates. Ceosci. Cut?.4, 126-136.
JONES,B. & DIxON, O.A. (1976) Storm deposits in the
Read Bay Formation (Upper Silurian), Somerset
Island. Arctic Canada (an application of Markov chain
analysis). J. sediin. Petrol. 46, 393-401.
KAZMIERCZAK,
J. & GOLDRING,
R. (1978) Subtidal flatpebble conglomerate from the Upper Devonian of
Poland : a multiprovenant high-energy product. Geol.
Mas. 115, 359-366.
KEITH, B.D. & FRltDMAN, G . M . (1977) A slope-basinplain model,Taconicsequence, New Yorkand Vermont.
J . sedini. Petrol. 41, 1220-1 241.
KELLING,G. & MULLIN,P.R. (1975) Graded liniestones and limestone-quartzite couplets: possible
storm-deposits from the Moroccan Carboniferous.
Seclim. Ceol. 13, 161-190.
KREIS4, R.D. (1979) Storm gencrated sedimentary
structures in the Martinsburg Formation (Upper
Ordovician) of southwest Virginia. Southeastern Ser.
Abst. Prug. geol. Soc. Am.
KSIAZKIEwfCz, M. (19523) Submarine slumping in the
Carpathian flysch. Antils Soc. @'ol. Pologne, 28, 123150.
LOCHMAN-BALK,
C. & WILSON, J.L. (1958) Cambrian
biostratigraphy in North America. J . Paleont. 32, 312350.
LOGAN,B.W. et a/. (1969) Carbonate sediments and
reefs, Yucatan shelf, Mexico. Meill. Am. Ass. Petrol.
GeoL 11, 1-196.
LOGAN,B.W. & S E M E N I UV.
K , (1976) Dynamic metamorphism; processes and products in Devonian carbonate rocks, Canning Basin, Western Australia.
Spec. Publ. .yeol. Six. Aust. 6, 138 pp.
LOHMANN,
K.C. (1976) Lower Dresbachian (Upper
Cambrian) platforni to-basin transition in eastern
Nevada and western Utah: an evaluation through
lithologic cycle correlation. Bri~liam Young Univ.
Ceol. Stud. 23, 1 11-1 22.
LOREAU,
J . P . & P U R S ~ RB.H.
,
(1973) Distribution and
ultrastructure of Holocene ooids in the Persian Gulf.
In: ThePersicrn Gulf (Ed. by B.H. Purser), pp. 279-3223.
Springer-Verlag, New York.
MCCAVE,1.N. (1972) Transport and escape of finegrained sediment from shelf areas. In: Shelf Sediment
Tran.vport: Pruce.rs anel Pattern (Ed. by D.J.P. Swift
et at.), pp. 225-248. Dowden, Hutchison and Ross,
Penn.
MASTERS,
C.D. (1967) Use of sedimentary structures in
determination of depositional environments, Mesaverde
Formation, Williams Fork Mountains, Colorado. Bull.
Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol. 51, 2033-2043.
MAZZULLO,
S.J. & FRIEUMAN, G.M. (1975) Conceptual model of tidally influenced deposition on margins
of epeiric scas: Lower Ordovician (Canadian) of eastern
New York and southwestern Vermont. Bull. Ant. Ass.
Petl.ol. Ct.01. 59, 2 123-2 141.
PALMER,
A.R. (1971a) The Cambrian of the Appalachians and eastern New England regions, eastern
United Sates. In: The Cui~ihrirniof the New World
(Ed. by C. H. Holland), pp. 169-217. Wile) (Interscience), New York.
PALMER,
A.R. (1971b) TheCamhrian of the Great Basin
and adjacent areas, western United States. In: The
SHINN,
E.A. (1969) Submarine Iithification of Holocene
carbonate sediments in the Pcrsian Gulf. Set/inicnro/og.P,
12, 109-144.
J. (1974) Searching for prehistoric earthquakes in
lake sediments. Eeirthei. ItiJ Bull. 6, 3-9.
SIMS, J.D. (1975) Determining earthquake recurrence
intervals from deformational structures in young
lacustrine sediments. Trctorruphj~s.29, 141-1 52.
S r J U L I ~ NP., & HULXRT,C. (1975) Evolution of the
Taconian orogcn in ihc Qucbcc Appalachians. Am. J .
Sci. A. 215, 337-362.
SWIF'T, D.J.P. (1976) Continental shelf sedirncntation.
1II : Murine Sedinient Trumpori and Enviroritirentu/
Managenierit (Ed. by 'D.J. Stanley and D.J.P. Swift),
pp. 31 1-350. Wiley, New York.
SIMS,
TRUSWFLL,
J.F. (1972) Sandstone sheets and related
intrusions from Coffee Bay, Transkei, South Africa.
J . sedirn. Petrol. 42, 578-583.
WANLFSS,H.R. (1979) Limestone response to stress:
pressure solution and dolomitization. J . .seciiin. Petrol.
49,437-462.
WATERSON,
C.D. (1950) Note on the sandstone injections of Eathie Haven, Cromarty. Geol. Mug. 87, 133139.
WILLIAMS, D.M. (1976) Clastic dykes from the Pre-