-------- Forwarded Message -------Subject: RE: Recent Response from Kent PSD ?

Fwd: CO/00076/15
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 06:49:13 +0000
From: Samantha Hamer <sammihamer@ymail.com>
To: PSD General Enquiries Kent <professional.standards@kent.pnn.police.uk>
emma.pearce@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk, patientexperience@kmpt.nhs.uk,
CC:
derrick@hamer400706da.plus.com <derrick@hamer400706da.plus.com>
P.s I did not agree to any sort of formal interview or anything like that I agreed to just a chat
keeping an open mind & with some hope I might finally find a professional police officer, I could
not have been more wrong.
My parents and many others can equally contest to the huge impact on me & my optomism there
might finally be a positive turn around before despite my doubts. Equally another problem at with
Aspergers is that I can be blind to people's motives at the time, yet despite that be profoundly
effected & all the more spun out a deliberately taken advantage of, which I feel DI Greenan was
fully awaire of and in effect targeted that to deliberately & profoundly effect me in a significant
manner, which it did for weeks after.
It's equally on record I have been positively screened for ASD, within a psycologists report, along
with IQ deficits in another and equally received DLA for many years & am currently reciting it's
replacement PIP. Equally my eldest son also has ASD. I equally despite everything am far too
trusting, I am equally fundimentally honest, so I don't myself emidiately think of needing a 3rd
party with me I can get overwhelmed and wrapped up in my thoughts too much. Hence why there is
ASD CJS guidence and other Mental Health Guidence. This equally applies to other matters too,
my ability to use vocabulary Is not a measure of the way my mind works, or how vulnerable and
easily effected I can be. Fine when in my work around good people, why I've only encountered all
this once I became a victim of significant crimes.

On 2 July 2015 07:26:05 BST, Samantha Hamer <sammihamer@ymail.com> wrote:

Dear DI Chapman & Emma at the IPCC,
Sorry, because your contunied responses defy any logic, in terms of basic rules of police conduct let
alone the contextual circumstances laid out in numerous emails already. Emma, Please could you
read the full email & ask this to be escalated.
In short having previously worked within a 24 hr news operation, namely Sky before I hit
becoming a target of abuse and exploitation I rather had a lot of experience of time codes having
started out at Avid Technology, based at the European HQ at Pinewood studios. So as you might
imagine I've equally seen many stories and equally documentaries, current affairs etc in the making
to be a little more informed irrespective of the effects of both abuse & corrupt police etc, etc. In
short the whole recording amounts to deliberate intimidation, harassment & bullying
for its ultimate desired objective to effect both my Aspergers and trigger the same mentality upon
me as my very abusers. It was psycological warfare, very much shown in its peristaltic bias, tone
and aggressiveness.
I only suggested coming in, to have a NORMAL chat, although already on back foot as the
circumstances in which DI Greenan got in touch out of the Blue seemed dodgy due to his senior

rank and the fact it's in effect Joanne Manjelicks (Aka Ian Watkins Woman) the woman who created
a load of drama to get me to call her last year, who then boasted about having just totally played the
IPCC in a meeting with them around that time & to the extent she was getting off on telling them
stories, when she was all along & still was wholly implicated in abuse & facilitating abusive
scenerios in her adult worker role, and was also going on about having to lean on powerful clients
to get her off her then being charged with I believe child rape images etc. She also checking how
much I might know about her as it became clear, there are links to the people that abused me,
children & got me unlawfully done for Harassment, even though I was running interference after
covertly filming enough to nearly get an investigative documentary setup with ORMEDIA &
Channel 4, hence having to run interference or I'd have stood out a mile due to there connections on
equally the Kinky & Swinger scenes.
So in short is was a world away from a NORMAL chat (on the very thin false pretense of finally
helping me as a victim), having had context of such with police for the majority of my life, either as
a witness reporting crime, or as a victim of crime, friends of family & even family being police
officers. Quite simply DI Greenan was as manipulative, calculating and psycological abusive as my
own abusers, bar actual physical violence & sexual abuse, but at many points I feared real violence.
Why after first listening to the recording, I could not listen to it all & have not been able to revisit
listening to it myself. Let alone do actually read the ASD CJS Guidence too.
Honestly this seemingly not sinking in (which to be frank is wholly unbelievable as a senior officer)
after repeating myself so many times from the outset, is more intimidation in itself, so please can
my complaint & it's investigation be escalated. As all this and other matters truly require futher
investigation not merely as complaints including yourself at this point. In fact somthing a DC Heart
was supposed to start doing at South Yorkshire Polices behest and other Kent Police officers before
him? It just seems you cannot be trusted to investigate when this is your behaviour really?
Considering I am very much having sucididal thoughts due to so much bringing all the more back it
building & building, your responses are truly a very dangerous tactic. I really do fear for any
vulnerable victims that face the same as I am, as such could ammount to in effect murder by proxy.
Regards,
Samantha Hamer
On 30 June 2015 10:34:26 BST, PSD General Enquiries Kent
<professional.standards@kent.pnn.police.uk> wrote:
Dear Miss Hamer,
Following my e mail sent to you on 16th June 2015, I have read your
e mail dated 19th June 2015 which was CCd to Kent Police
Professional Standards.
Im afraid your e mail does not respond to my request to identify the
specific excerpts of the meeting you had with D.I. Greenan, where
you allege that he was bullying and intimidating.
As per my request in the letter which I sent to you, can you please
identify the specific minute and second of the sections of the
recording where D.I. Greenan is bullying or intimidating you.
In the absence of any specific excerpts from the recording in which

you identify this behaviour, I will not review the recording again and
will submit my report for a decision to be made in respect of this
complaint.
Kind regards,
DI Chapman
Professional Standards Department
From: Samantha Hamer [mailto:sammihamer@ymail.com]
Sent: 19 June 2015 00:25
To: Raj Chada; BStPrix@hja.net
Cc: jcockburn@hja.net; UK CSAPT; emma.pearce@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk; PSD General
Enquiries Kent; carol.povey@nas.org.uk
Subject: Recent Response from Kent PSD ? Fwd: CO/00076/15

Dear Raj & All,

Just wondering if anyone is actually going to help, as officers like DI
Greenan getting away with not being equally investigated wider, is about
safegaruding child and vulnerable people, not about me. More so
considering the telling cirumstance in which he got in touch with me out of
the Blue of the back of Joanne Mjadzelics (Ian Watkins and a dodgy
as heck herself, for what she admited directly to me, getting powerful
people/clients to get her off her charges) fronting it on Twitter and then
me raising with Sussex Police actually.
I spoke to my father about this and where perplexed, as Ive repeated and
repeated the wider context & the actually overiding dodgy of DI Greenan,
motives for his bulling (that being the bigger question) in writing to Kent
Police & PSD Department directly after the event, more than putting one
word within a several hour session of intimidation at his hands. Context and
I will copy all on the email correspondence directly once Ive dug it all out,
however Kent PSD do obviously have it all as it was direct to them (pretty
sure I copied you at the IPCC too) ?
The recording and relating information other than those emails as yet, here
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/k5nu2pw9floq2ut/AACNK42Th75QidbVrBev4UKa?dl=0
What stands out is that this should not wait for the results of any appeal
considering the safgaurding risks. Equally that there is an expectation that
my legal represenatives should be dealing with such, as per the Legal
Obudsman too. Why are you not simply putting in another legal aid
application, mirroring Covent Garden Family law for thew very fact as per
then (then rightly and responaily helping and jumping in to put in place a
none-molestation order in additon to Police bail conditions against Rose
May, abusing me, even though not there area of Law) the effects of my own
abuse now, making your direct practical help all the more a need. What DI
Greenan was trying to take advantage of along with my Aspergers traits, tyo
possibly push me over the edge, and it really did have very nearly the
desired effect, not being able to go out for weeks after.

Not forgetting there are many more officers that need investigating, not
merely within Kent Police, a vid while at least feeling more safe, some
restbite from it all in Vancouver last year. Then feeling an ethical obligation
to go down to Cuba and check out the links to all this there.
https://youtu.be/mfiP3J7ecMs
So whats going on with ALL, seriously, is anyone going to start to do the
Right thing?
Regards,
Samantha Hamer
-------- Forwarded Message -------Subject: CO/00076/15
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 11:23:57
+0000
From: PSD General Enquiries Kent
To: 'sammihamer@ymail.com'

Dear Miss Hamer,

Please find attached a letter from DI Chapman of the Professional Standards
Department and a further letter dated 16th March 2015 which was sent by
DI Chapman to Kellys Solicitors, for your attention.
Kind regards,
Hayley
Hayley Bish
PA to Head of Professional Standards Department
Kent Police
Direct Ext: 19-3007
Tel: 01622 653007
Email: pa.professional.standards@kent.pnn.police.uk
This email and any other accompanying document(s) contain information
from Kent Police and/or Essex Police, which is confidential or privileged.
The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s)
or bodies to whom it is addressed. The content, including any subsequent
replies, could be disclosable if relating to a criminal investigation or civil
proceedings. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or other use of the contents of this
information is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please
notify us immediately by contacting the sender or telephoning Kent Police
on 01622 690690 or Essex Police on 01245 491491, as appropriate.

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus

software.
www.avast.com
This email and any other accompanying document(s) contain information
from Kent Police and/or Essex Police, which is confidential or privileged.
The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s)
or bodies to whom it is addressed. The content, including any subsequent
replies, could be disclosable if relating to a criminal investigation or civil
proceedings. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or other use of the contents of this
information is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please
notify us immediately by contacting the sender or telephoning Kent Police
on 01622 690690 or Essex Police on 01245 491491, as appropriate.
-Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.