Professional Documents
Culture Documents
04
07
09
10
15
16
18
20
21
23
27
30
32
t would seem Finance Minister Arun Jaitley was well aware of the huge burden of
expectations he was carrying on his shoulders this time, when he rose to present the
Budget for 2015-16.
Taking off from the view that the world now
thinks it is Indias chance to fly, Jaitley put
together a Budget which, if one joins the dots,
sets the stage for a new economic order in India.
Alongside, acutely aware of the need to push
growth despite the new GDP calculations, the
finance minister has taken the route of pushing
public investment for the purpose while veering
slightly away from the fiscal consolidation path
for the moment.
India and increased infrastructure spend. Measures like New Bankruptcy legislation, startup
entrepreneurs funds, GST rollout by FY 2016,
deferral of GAAR will definitely support the
cause of ease of doing business in India.
Adds Rajiv Lall, executive chairman, IDFC: Its
a development oriented budget and not a populist budget. A welcome shift in direction.
However, BMR Advisors chairman Mukesh Butani expresses mixed reactions. From a policy
standpoint, the FM has engineered the Budget
around the Prime Ministers initiatives such as
Make in India, Swachh Bharat, and Skill in
India. The focus on black money and curing the
economy of this menace seems to have taken
centrestage. The impetus to infrastructure,
agriculture and education sectors is laudable
though the much expected big bang reforms are
yet in the waiting.
Impact under watch
With the overall macro situation now benign
and inflation coming under control, Jaitley realizes this was his best chance to lay the broad
reform framework in place, and execute the
various elements over time. However, what will
be keenly watched is how the Budget initiatives
play out in the days and months ahead and
whether Jaitleys gamble on growth actually
pays off.
As BMRs Rajiv Dimri points out: Much of the
reforms process outlined in the budget proposals needs to be realized through tangible steps
over the year. It remains to be seen how reforms
unfold and take shape in terms of GST implementation and TARC recommendations. Impact
on prices would be interesting to watch with
budget proposals withdrawing service tax exemptions on construction of airports and ports,
government services, increase in service tax
rates and higher additional duties on petrol and
diesel.
While the ultimate test for Jaitley will be in how
the various Budget proposals are implemented,
the finance minister does deserve full marks this
time round for putting forward a Budget which
aims to address multiple challenges. As a statement of intent, it gets full marks. And that is a
pretty good beginning.
Copyright 2012 Firstpost
n the film My Fair Lady, when Prof Higgins returns home after successfully showcasing Eliza Doolittle at a society event, his
friend Colonel Pickering breaks into song - 'tonight old man, you did it, you did, you said you
would do it and indeed you did.
Many would like to sing that to finance minister
Arun Jaitley after his budget speech today. Yes,
it was devoid of Big Bang Reforms, but after the
Economic Survey yesterday which advocated a
more incremental approach, this was expected.
But he has done a series of small things, which
together will add up to an effect similar to what
a few big ticket reforms will.
When he said the budget would provide a roadmap for accelerating growth, enhancing investment and passing on the benefit of the growth
process to the common man, woman, youth
and child: those, whose quality of life needs to
be improved these were not empty words. The
budget has delivered on each of these.
Jaitley has given infrastructure spending a big
push without pushing up the fiscal deficit hugely
Most importantly, Jaitley has given infrastructure spending a big push without pushing up
the fiscal deficit hugely (though he has relaxed
the fiscal consolidation roadmap).
The main problem areas have been identified
and addressed. The problem of stuck projects
and lack of new investments had been flagged
time and again. It was well known that a lot of
this was due to the problem of sovereign clearances, which just dont come.
Theres a planned legislation to set up a preexisting regulatory mechanism to take care of
multiple prior permissions. While this will take
its time in coming (theres going to be an expert
committee that will draft this), what will come
sooner is setting up projects in a plug-and-play
mode. Which means the government will first
The minister also proposed additional deduction of Rs 25,000 for differently-abled persons, increasing the limit from Rs.50,000 to
Rs.75,000.
He also proposed to increase the limit of tax
deduction from Rs.1 lakh to Rs.1.25 lakh in case
of severe disability.
Investment in Sukanya Samriddhi Scheme will
B. The Centre has proposed to launch Atal Pension Yojana to provide a defined pension based
upon the contribution and its period. The govt
will contribute 50% of the contribution limited
to Rs 1,000 per year, for 5 years, in the new accounts opened before December 31, 2015.
C. The finance minister announced Pradhan
Mantri Jeevan Jyoti Bima Yojana that will cover
both natural and accidental death risk of Rs 2
lakh at a premium of Rs 330 per year for everyone in the age group of 18-50.
Copyright 2012 Firstpost
Similar increases are proposed on cigars, cheroots and cigarillos. Last year, the finance minister had hiked duty by 22 percent. Even custom
duty on tobacco haso been increased to Rs 70
per kg from the Rs 60.
The finance minister also proposed to hike service tax from 12.36 percent to 14 percent. Making air travel, eating out and mobile bills more
expensive. Going out for concerts and sports
events will call for shelling out extra bucks due
to the service tax hike.
Even aerated sugary drinks like colas and packaged water are likely to piche the pocket a bit
for deduction under section 80C of the incometax and any payment from the scheme shall not
be liable to tax.
s far as goodies for the common man are concerned, there was nothing much in the budget
presented by the finance minister Arun Jaitley today.
The tax deduction allowed on the payment of health insurance premium was increased to Rs
25,000 from the current Rs 15,000. This will lead to tax savings of Rs 1,030-Rs 3,090, depending
on which tax bracket you fall into. For senior citizens this limit was increased to Rs 30,000 from
the current Rs 20,000 per year.
Also, for very senior citizens of the age 80 years or more, who are not covered by health insurance,
a deduction of Rs 30,000 per year has been allowed on expenditure incurred on their treatment.
For expenditure incurred towards specified diseases of serious nature, very senior citizens will now
be allowed a deduction of Rs 80,000, in comparison to the earlier Rs 60,000.
The one good development has been an increase in the limit of deduction allowed on investing
in the National Pension Scheme(NPS) to Rs 1.5 lakh from the current Rs 1 lakh, under Section
80CCD.
In fact, Jaitley has also proposed an extra deduction of up to Rs 50,000 for investing in the NPS,
over and above the Rs 1.5 lakh.
Oh, and the transport allowance exemption has been increased from the current Rs 800 to Rs
1600. That should be a huge help indeed.
Hence, net-net the budget does not have much to offer to the middle-class taxpayer. The question
that arises here is that why should the budget have goodies to offer to the middle-class taxpayer
every year? Ultimately, a stable income tax policy is also very important.
That is indeed a fair point. Nevertheless, when the government is working towards bringing down
the tax rate for corporates, why shouldn't something be on offer to the middle-class tax payers as
well? That's a question worth asking.
The finance minister Arun Jaitley in his speech said: The basic rate of Corporate Tax in India at
30% is higher than the rates prevalent in the other major Asian economies, making our domestic
industry uncompetitive. Moreover, the effective collection of Corporate Tax is about 23%.
Along with bringing down the tax rate for corporates, Jaitley also said that we do not get that tax
due to excessive exemptions. A regime of exemptions has led to pressure groups, litigation and loss
of revenue. It also gives room for avoidable discretion. The suggestion here was that along with
income tax rates coming down, the exemptions that are allowed to corporates will come down as
well. The idea seems to be that at lower rates more corporate taxes can be collected.
Along with the budget every year, the government also releases a document called the statement
of revenue foregone. The estimates and projections are intended to indicate the potential revenue
gain that would be realised by removing exemptions, deductions, weighted deductions and similar
measures, the statement points out.
As can be seen from the above table, the revenue foregone number of the central government for
this financial year is Rs 5,89,285.2 crore. This is higher than the fiscal deficit of Rs 512628 projected for this financial year.
Nevertheless, it is important to point out that the revenue foregone number is based on certain assumptions. The estimates are based on a short-term impact analysis. They are developed assuming that the underlying tax base would not be affected by removal of such measures...The impact
of each tax incentive is determined separately, assuming that all other tax provisions remain unchanged. Many of the tax concessions do, however, interact with each other. Therefore, the interactive impact of tax incentives could turn out to be different from the tax expenditure calculated by
adding up the estimates and projections for each provision.
So the revenue foregone figure needs to be looked at with these limitations in mind. Having said
that, the government of India is losing out on revenue because of the exemptions and deductions.
There is no denying that.
As can be seen from the above table, corporate India is a major beneficiary of all the exemptions
and deductions. If one adjusts for personal income tax, the revenue foregone for the central government still comes in at a whopping Rs 5,48,850.6 crore for 2014-2015. While this number maybe
notional, there is clearly no denying that corporates benefit immensely out of the deductions and
exemptions that have crept into our tax laws over the years.
In fact, bigger the corporate the more deductions and exemptions they take. Corporates, which
make an operating profit within the range of Rs 0-1 crore have an effective tax rate of 26.89%
Those in the Rs 50-100 crore range have an effective tax rate of 24.29%. Whereas those making a
profit of greater than Rs 500 crore have an effective tax rate of 20.68%.
The overall rate is 23.22%. Jaitley wants to push up this rate of actual tax paid by bringing down
the corporate tax rate to 25% from the current 30%, over the next four years. The hope also seems
to be that at lower tax rates more taxes will eventually get paid.
The question is why can't the same logic be applied to individual tax payers? Around 3% of Indians
pay income tax. If more corporates are likely to pay more tax at lower rates, can't the same assumption be made for individual tax payers as well? Further, like the corporates income tax laws,
can't the personal income tax laws simplified as well?
Copyright 2012 Firstpost
This is something that the finance minister Arun Jaitley needs to answer. May be he will in the
days to come.
(Vivek Kaul is the author of the Easy Money trilogy. He tweets @kaul_vivek)
inance Minister Arun Jaitley today presented the Union budget for FY16 in the
backdrop of easing inflation and interest
rates but continued growth challenges which
the government needs to address. Jaitley announced plans for a universal social security
system that would give poor Indians access to
subsidised insurance and pensions. Tax benefits were proposed on health insurance, raising the exemption ceiling to Rs. 25,000 from
Rs. 15,000. For senior citizens, the exemption
would be up to Rs 30,000. The finance minister
also proposed to provide coverage for accidents
and death to the poor for just Rs. 12 a year.
Jaitley raised the tax incentive limit for investment in pension fund by Rs. 50,000, taking it
to Rs. 1.5 lakh. But here's the biggest setback:
Service tax has been hiked from 12.3 percent to
14 percent, which means everything from eating
out, to ordering in, going to the theatres is all
going to get expensive.
The 3 achievements of Govt have been PM's
Jan Dhan Yojana, transparent auctions &
Swachh Bharat, said Jaitley: Here are the highlights of his speech in parliament:
The world is predicting it is India's chance
to fly and credibility of the economy has been
re-estbalished. Not only is ours the second best
performing stock markets among the big economies, but India is poised to be the fastest-growing economy
Reuters
Reuters
Coal bearing states will get several lakhs of
crores thanks tot he coal block auction
50 lakh toilets have already been constructed
in 2014-2015 and we will achieve our target of
six crore toilets
GST will be put in place as a state of art indirect tax system by April 1st 2016
allocation will take care of the family planning agenda and the new AIIMS," Population
Foundation of India executive director Poonam
Muttreja has been quoted as saying in a report
in The Times of India.
The announcement of the five more AIIMS need
to be taken with a pinch off salt as this is not
going to happen in the foreseeable future. The
July budget had also proposed to set up four
AIIMS-like institutions in Andhra Pradesh,
West Bengal, Maharashtra and Uttar Pradesh.
The fund set aside was a meagre Rs 500 crore.
There is no update on what has happened to
this plan yet. But with the cut in the health allocation last year, there is no reason to believe
that the government has made any headway on
this.
Coming back to the immediate issues in the
healthcare sector, one has to look at the allocation in the context of the spreading swine flu in
the country. According to a PTI report, citing
health ministry statistics, swine flu has claimed
1,041 lives as of 28 February while the number
of people affected by the virus crossed 19,000.
In this context, as the healthcare sector experts
point out, it is urgently needed to allocate funds
to control such disease outbreaks.
The allocation itself is too low. As a percent of
total expenditure it is just 1.86 percent, which
is also the second lowest in the last 10 years.
The lowest was in 2012-13, when the allocation
stood at Rs 25,539 crore, which was just 1.81
percent of the total expenditure that year.
However, this is nothing new in India. As per
data, India's health and family care allocations
have on an average always remained a low 1.96
percent of the total expenditure over the last 10
years (without taking into account the 20 percent cut in 2014-15). Next year's allocation is
lower than this 10-year average.
Copyright 2012 Firstpost
As per an analysis of new income tax proposals, an individual aged below 60 years can make
additional saving of up to Rs 24,596 a year if
his or her annual income is above Rs 10 lakh
but below Rs 1 crore. For senior citizens in this
income bracket, savings would be little lower at
Rs 21,630.
At the same time, senior citizens above 60 years
of age would have to pay additional tax of Rs
64,550 a year if their annual income is more
than Rs one crore.
For the individuals below 60 years of age, with
annual income of over Rs one crore, the additional tax works out to a little lower at Rs
61,271, according to an 'impact report' prepared
by consultancy major PwC for the income tax
proposals made by Finance Minister Arun Jaitley in his Budget yesterday.
Jaitley has announced increasing the super-
He is still trying to project an upbeat perception of 8.5 percent growth in GDP and at the
same time curtailing all big spending. This is the
quandary that the finance minister expects the
common man to understand, and this is what
will not be in the noise that even the pink dailies
will not explain on Page One.
Not tinkering with the tax rates for the middle
class or asking them to take care of themselves
may not go down well. But some things will long
be remembered - as the strokes of Chris Gayle
- after the pink newspapers have become packing papers and the noise in the studios shift to a
new controversy.
i) For instance, laying down a roadmap for
reducing corporate taxes, and reforming the
corporate tax structure by removing exemption. This is Jaitleys 'saral' taxation attempt for
the corporates. This will occupy centerstage in
industry associations as they lobby heavily for
retaining the exemptions. Tax consultants who
Copyright 2012 Firstpost
delivery budget.
On the eve of the budget itself, the Chief Economic Advisor was very realistic in helping us
moderate our expectations.
The proposed Investment and Infrastructure
Fund has brought a mild cheer to the industry
but the atmosphere for investments does not
see a big change. For fiscal deficit to be brought
down, the government must trigger the investment cycle. Without any reduction in interest
rates, it does not seem possible. Investments
have not kicked off in the last eight months
(from 38 percent to 32 percent).
Behind each of these laws stands a large community of vested interests backing it and the
fight to repeal or amend them will be fought
tooth and nail. Not just individuals like insurance agents or companies that benefit from
weak regulations, but dont be surprised if
pushback to these reforms comes from some of
the regulators themselves, notably the Reserve
Bank of India and the Insurance and Regulatory
Development Authority of India.
Indias international financial centre will occupy the time zone thats currently lying vacant,
between Singapore to the East and Dubai to the
West. But thats only semantics. If it rises to
the occasion, it will be able to pull back a lot of
markets that India has lost. Much depends on
execution, some of which has begun. Phase 1,
for instance, is in an advanced stage of completion, and institutions such as World Trade Centres, State Bank of India, and a Bombay Stock
Exchange tower have already committed to it.
he Narendra Modi government has unleashed a war on black money like never
before. A new law with very heavy penalties has been promised.
Given the subdued sentiment in the private sector and the cold response to the public private
partnership (PPP) route, public investments
had to step in. This was something emphasised
in both the Mid Year Economic Analysis as well
as the Economic Survey which spoke about public investment playing a catalytic role.
creative accounting.
But like always it has come at the cost of capital
expenditure theres been a 15 percent cut over
the budgeted estimates. The subsidy bill is down
too, but once again it is on account of lower oil
prices which brought down both the fertiliser
and petroleum subsidies.
The food subsidy bill was supposed to bring in
considerable savings because of the delayed
rollout of the National Food Security Act but
that didnt happen. The revised estimates of
food subsidy are 6.6 percent higher than the
budget estimates.
But a course correction seems to be on the cards
this year. Pressure has to be kept up on the government to stay this course.
Revenue expenditure needs to be pruned and
subsidies are the only item that lend themselves
to pruning. Jaitley will be excused for deviating from the glide path this year. He will not be
excused if he strays again.
ew Delhi: Aviation has been largely ignored in the Union Budget for 2015-16,
as most of the sector's demands such as
giving airlines infrastructure status and bringing down taxation on MROs have been ignored.
Besides, air travel in business class or first class
could get more expensive as the rebate available
earlier has been reduced.
Also, it remains to be seen if the announcement by Finance Minister Arun Jaitley that this
Government may look at divestment or strategic
sale of loss making PSUs could have any implication for the ailing Air India. For 2015-16,
Jaitley has provided only Rs 2,500 crore against
the airline's demand of Rs 4277 crore. Air India's net loss came down to Rs 5,389 crore in
FY14 compared with Rs 5,490 crore in FY13 and
Rs 7,559.74 crore in FY12.
In the Budget, Rs 80 crore has been provided to
the Airports Authority of India, of which Rs 22
crore has been earmarked for the new Greenfield airport coming up in Pakyong, Sikkim.
Amber Dubey, partner and India head, aerospace and defence, KPMG, termed the Budget
as a disappointing day for aviation. He lamented that long pending industry demands of tax
rebates on Aviation Turbine Fuel, Maintenance
Repair and Overhaul services (MRO), airports
Copyright 2012 Firstpost
Except, for announcing the Rape Crisis Centres and some small cosmetic initiatives, no big
schemes, awareness drives or support infrastructure was built in the last year. Let's say the
Modi government followed in the footprints of
all the earlier governments, making vacuous announcements that were hardly followed up with
action.
This year round too, women's safety figured
for a fleeting moment in the budget, with no
schemes or initiatives announced by the FM
himself. If the women and child development
ministry's track record in the area is anything
to go by, adding Rs 1,000 crore to the Nirbhaya
fund seems like a patchwork on the ministry's
dismal performance in the last year.
Jaitley has effectively eased the burden of women's safety off his shoulders by announcing an
impressive amount of money for the purpose
of safety. Now, he can conveniently point at
the women and child development ministry in
terms of how they plan to use it.
Copyright 2012 Firstpost
udget 2015 failed to provide any concrete road map for the government's
ambitious green energy targets. Finance
Minister Arun Jaitley shared no details on the
implementation and financing of solar, wind,
biomass and hydro energy projects in the country.
Technology.
Anmol Jaggi, director, Gensol Consultants, says,
"The excise cut on copper wire and tin alloy
for solar PV cell manufacturing is again a good
move but the impact on project cost is not even
0.5 percent."
India is today a 1,000 MW per year solar market; the government wants to increase this 100
times in the next seven years.
"Unlike rail and roads, tax-free bonds have not
been specifically proposed for renewable energy," says Anish De, partner infrastructure and
government services, KPMG India. "Given this,
any funds from tax-free bonds will now have to
come out of the general pool of infrastructure
bonds," he says.
Even though the government has conceptualised forming a holding company to facilitate
capital mobilisation of state-run banks, this will
inance minister Arun Jaitley faced a major dilemma before presenting the Union
budget on Saturday. The Indian economy
was not seeing enough fresh investments which
was hurting present and future growth. In fact,
fresh investments in the economy have been
consistently slowing, from 34.7 percent (as a
percentage of GDP) in the first quarter of 201112 to 30.1 percent at the end of the second quarter of the current fiscal (2014-15).
Jaitley chose to bite the bullet. I want to underscore that my government still remains firm on
achieving the medium-term target of 3 percent
of GDP. But that journey has to take into account the need to increase public investment.
The total additional public investment over and
above the revised estimates is planned to be Rs
1.25 lakh crore out of which Rs 70,000 crore
would be capital expenditure from budgetary
outlays. I will complete the journey to a fiscal
deficit of 3 percent in three years, rather than
the two years envisaged previously, the finance
minister said in his budget. The target that he
has set for the next three years is 3.9 percent
(2015-16), 3.5 percent (2016-17) and 3 percent
(2017-18) respectively. The additional fiscal
space will go towards funding infrastructure
investment, said Jaitley.
Pushing for public investment is certainly the
right thing to do especially when the private
sector investment pipeline is dry, says R Seashasayee, vice-chairman, Ashok Leyland Ltd.
The new GDP numbers revealed that the growth
was coming through efficiency and not from an
expanding economy. Without fresh investment
into the economy, this growth will start to slip
again.
Jaitley has also attempted to tackle another
important issue freeing up major infrastructure projects that are embroiled in various
litigations. The government will introduce the
Public Contract (Resolution of Disputes) Bill
to streamline institutional arrangements for
resolving various disputes. This will free up a
large number of infrastructure projects caught
in legal tangles. He has also promised to revisit
and revitalise the public-private partnership
model. These measures should give a fillip to
investment in the economy and more so, in the
badly needed infrastructure space.
This article was first published in Forbes India.
Copyright 2012 Firstpost
inance Minister Arun Jaitley on Saturday presented the Narendra Modi governments first
full budget, promising to revive the economy from what he termed was a period of gloom.
The minister said the country was now the fastest growing economy and, earning praise from
Prime Minister Narendra Modi who said the budget was practical and pro-poor, pro-growth, promiddle class, pro-youth.
Among the highlights of Jaitleys speech were: No change in personal Income Tax, Health Insurance Premium deduction hiked from Rs 15,000 to Rs 25,000; for senior citizens to Rs 30,000,
transport allowance exemption hiked to Rs 1,600 from Rs 800 per month, additional 2% surcharge
on people earning over Rs 1 cr; Direct Taxes Code (DTC) dropped, Rs 50,000 deduction for contribution to New Pension Scheme, Corporate Tax cut to 25% over next four years.
Click on the image below to view the full text of the Budget speech:
All three are needed, but are essentially draconian in nature. They will enable the taxman
and the investigating agencies to wield enormous power against citizens. The potential for
corruption and graft will escalate, not reduce
if these powers are not counter-balanced with
safeguards. Draconian laws can be justified only
if people are offered a chance to come clean. Or
else, they will not work.
For example, the Finance Bill includes a proposal to amend the Income-Tax Act to prohibit acceptance or payment of an advance of
Rs20,000 or more in cash for the purchase of
immovable property. Quoting of PAN is being
made mandatory for any purchase or sale exceeding the value of Rs 1 lakh.
This sounds innocuous, but how will any taxman know if I have paid more than Rs 20,000
in cash when I buy property when reported
transactions may anyway be undervalued to
avoid stamp duty? Will this be done by intrusive checks of bank accounts or by aggressively
querying property sellers and buyers?
Then again, the finance minister announced
that third party reporting entities would be
required to furnish information about foreign
currency sales and cross-border transactions.
Provision is also being made to tackle splitting
of reportable transactions. To improve enforcement, CBDT and CBEC will leverage technology
and have access to information in each others
database.
It is always a good idea for the Central Board
of Direct Taxes (CBDT) and the Central Board
of Excise and Customs (CBEC) to share data;
presumably, the data will also be shared with
the Enforcement Directorate which looks at the
foreign money laundering angle. One also presumes that the reference to splitting or reportable transactions includes domestic real estate,
which is where this happens often in order to
avoid higher stamp duties.
Once again, without safeguards built into the
law, citizen data will be in the hands of tax
sleuths who could misuse the information for
various reasons. Also, the mere access to data
should not be a license to launch fishing expeditions against all and sundry. The law clearly
needs to draw a balance between the need to
prevent black money generation and the citizens right to non-intrusive surveillance and
privacy.
The third issue is the draconian nature of the
penalties proposed. Just as giving rapists a
death sentence does not do much to deter rape,
laws with excessive punishments may not do
much to deter potential crooks. It is the certainty of punishment that is vital. This needs
Copyright 2012 Firstpost
supply of black money will diminish if discretionary power in the hands of decision-makers
can be reduced dramatically or eliminated.
The last issue is being addressed partly at the
central level by holding auctions for scarce
resources (spectrum, coal), by reducing red tape
in central clearances (green nod, wildlife nod,
etc) and by eliminating inspector raj.
But at the state level, these discretionary powers remain entrenched. And the sector with the
highest potential for future generation of black
wealth (and benami ownership) is real estate,
where the sheer number of municipal and other
clearances needed ensures that more black
money is generated and stored in benami properties.
The stock issue and the flow issue are also interrelated. If I am sitting on a huge stash of black
money, I cannot use it without insisting that I
make future payments in black money. Or I will
have to send it abroad through the hawala route
and bring it back by calling it foreign investment. Excessive black money stock ensures that
black money will continue to be generated in
future too, even when the laws change to make
punishments more stringent.
The only realistic way to deal with the stock issue is to offer an amnesty scheme so that some
of the high levels of black wealth held abroad or
at home can now be tapped and put to constructive use to aid the poor and for building infrastructure.
First, black money faces both a stock issue (accumulated black wealth generated during years
of crony socialism and a controlled economy)
and a flow issue (creation of more black money
due to lopsided or high taxes, the need for
massive election funding, and the retention of
discretionary power in ministerial and bureaucratic hands.
The elimination of avenues for the deployment of black money held abroad the use of
participatory notes to invest in Indian stocks
anonymously will also have a negative impact on foreign flows, with bad consequences
for the stock markets and investor sentiment.
Once again, banning P-notes will need counterbalancing the stoppage of flows by encouraging
them through an amnesty scheme.
iPad
Android
iPhone