FGD Retrofit Options

ANDRITZ air pollution control
Hightech solutions are often based on simple ideas

Retrofitting of Large
Combustion Plants
Ch. Patterer, 31.10.2012, Vienna
Energy Community Workshop, October 2012
Energy Community Workshop

Table of content
Overview of the Andritz Group

WET Flue Gas Desulphurisation (W-FGD)
DRY Flue Gas Desulphurisation (D-FGD)
Comparison of WET and DRY FGD Solutions
WET and DRY FGD Projects under Execution
2
ANDRITZ Energy & Environment
The ANDRITZ GROUP

Overview
Company
ANDRITZ AG, Graz, Austria (Group headquarters)
More than 180 production and service sites worldwide
Employees: approximately 17,400 worldwide (as of June 30, 2012)
Key figures 2011
Order intake: 5,707 MEUR
Sales: 4,596 MEUR
Net income (including non-controlling interests): 232 MEUR
Equity ratio (as of end of 2011): 21 %
Products and services
Plants and services for hydropower stations, the pulp and paper industry, solid-liquid
separation in the municipal and industrial sectors, the steel industry, and the
production of animal feed and biomass pellets
Company Profile
A world market leader in most business areas
HYDRO
40-45%*
Electromechanical equipment
for hydropower
plants (mainly turbines and generators); pumps;
turbo generators
PULP & PAPER

30-35%*
Systems for the

production of all
types of pulp and
of certain paper
grades (tissue,
cartonboard);
boilers
SEPARATION
10%*
Equipment for the

mechanical and
thermal solid/
liquid separation
for municipalities
and various
industries
METALS
10%*
Systems for the

production and
processing of
stainless steel
and carbon steel
strips; industrial
furnaces
* Long-term average share of the ANDRITZ GROUPs total order intake
ANDRITZ Energy & Environment GmbH company presentation October 2012
FEED & BIOFUEL

5%*
Systems for the

production of
animal feed
pellets (pet and
fish food) and
biomass pellets
(wood, straw)
Strengthening of the Market Position

Growth through organic expansion and acquisitions
2006
2007
2008
2008
2010
2010
2010
2011
HYDRO
VA TECH HYDRO
Tigp
GE Hydro business
GEHI (JV)
Precision Machine
Hammerfest Strm (55.4%)
Ritz
Hemicycle Controls
1997
1998
2000
2002
2004
2005
2008
2012
2012
METALS
Sundwig
Thermtec
Kohler
SELAS SAS Furnace Div.
Kaiser
Lynson
Maerz
Bricmont
Soutec
1992
1996
2002
2004
2004
2004
2005
2006
2009
2009
2010
SEPARATION
TCW Engineering
Guinard
3SYS
Bird Machine
NETZSCH Filtration
Fluid Bed Systems of
VA TECH WABAG
Lenser Filtration
CONTEC Decanter
Delkor Capital Equipment
Frautech
KMPT
1990
1992
1994
1998
1999
2000
2000
2000
2002
2003
2003
2003
2004
2005
2005
2006
2006
2006
2007
2007
2008
2009
2010
2010
2011
2011
2011
2011
PULP & PAPER

Sprout-Bauer
Durametal
Kone Wood
Kvaerner Hymac
Winberg
Ahlstrom Machinery
Lamb Baling Line
Voith Andritz Tissue LLC (JV)
ABB Drying
IDEAS Simulation
Acutest Oy
Fiedler
EMS (JV)
Cybermetrics
Universal Dynamics Group
Ksters
Carbona
Pilo
Bachofen + Meier
Sindus
Kufferath
Rollteck
Rieter Perfojet
DMT/Biax
AE&E Austria
Iggesund Tools
Tristar Industries
Asselin-Thibeau
FEED & BIOFUEL

1995 Jesma-Matador
2000 UMT
2005 Chemes Strojarne
4.596
3.283
3.610
3.554
3.198
2.710
1.110 1.225
1.481
1.744
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Sales of the ANDRITZ GROUP (MEUR)
Important Key Figures Q2 and H1 2012 at a Glance

Satisfactory business development
Unit
H1 2012
H1 2011
+/-
Q2 2012
Q2 2011
+/-
2011
Order intake
MEUR
2,554.4
3,644.5
-29.9%
1,193.2
1,978.5
-39.7%
5,706.9
Order backlog (as of end of period)
MEUR
6,935.9
7,249.0
-4.3%
6,935.9
7,249.0
-4.3%
6,683.1
Sales
MEUR
2,437.8
2,011.1
+21.2%
1,252.1
1,087.4
+15.1%
4,596.0
EBITDA
MEUR
184.7
157.0
+17.6%
98.2
88.3
+11.2%
386.2
EBITA
MEUR
155.6
131.6
+18.2%
83.1
75.5
+10.1%
331.5
EBIT
MEUR
143.1
123.1
+16.2%
76.4
71.1
+7.5%
312.7
EBT
MEUR
149.8
127.1
+17.9%
79.7
72.1
+10.5%
321.7
Financial result
MEUR
6.7
4.0
+67.5%
3.3
1.0 +230.0%
9.0
Net income (including non-controlling interests)
MEUR
107.5
89.7
+19.8%
57.1
50.9
+12.2%
231.5
Cash flow from operating activities
MEUR
119.4
206.8
-42.3%
88.2
55.7
+58.3%
433.8
Capital expenditure
MEUR
34.5
23.5
+46.8%
15.0
13.2
+13.6%
77.0
EBITDA margin
7.6
7.8
7.8
8.1
8.4
EBITA margin
6.4
6.5
6.6
6.9
7.2
EBIT margin
5.9
6.1
6.1
6.5
6.8
17,420
16,119
+8.1%
17,420
16,119
+8.1%
16,750
Employees (as of end of period)
ANDRITZ Share
Solid performance, broad research coverage
Performance June 2001
(ANDRITZ IPO) until
June 30, 2012:
ANDRITZ: +1,444%
ATX: +60%
Relative share price performance of the ANDRITZ

share versus the ATX since the IPO:
Performance in
H1 2012:
ANDRITZ: +23%
ATX: -2%
Market capitalization
ANDRITZ as of
June 30, 2012:
4,215 MEUR
Broad research coverage
Baader Bank, Berenberg Bank, Cheuvreux, Commerzbank, Deutsche Bank, Erste Bank, Goldman Sachs,
Hauck & Aufhuser, HSBC, J.P. Morgan, Kepler Capital Markets, RCB, UBS
Note: On April 23, 2012, the ANDRITZ share was split in a ratio of 1:2. All share price data and key figures were adjusted accordingly.
1 June 2001: IPO at 2.63 EUR/share 2 June 2003: Secondary Public Offering at 2.85 EUR/share 3 Closing price as of March 30, 2012: 40.52 EUR
Air Pollution Control within ANDRITZ

Diversified product range and a clear focus
ANDRITZ GROUP
Air Pollution
Control
Wood
Processing
Recovery &
Power
Fiber and
Chemical
Pulp Drying
Steam generators and plants
Pulp &
Paper
Services
Mechanical
Fiber
Preparation
Pulping
Power plant services
Paper
Technology
WET Flue Gas Desulphurisation (W-FGD)

Limestone based open spray tower technology
WET Limestone Flue Gas Desulphurization

Well proven technology for high removal efficiencies
Clean
gas
Raw
gas
Gypsum
Limestone
powder
Process characteristics:
Open spray tower optimized by advanced CFD tools
Removing of acid gaseous pollutants (SO2, HCl, HF)
Low operation cost due to low sorbent costs (limestone)
Low maintenance costs
Beneficial use for solid product (marketable gypsum)
Most used technology worldwide
Performance data:
High SO2 removal rate:
SO3 removal rate:
Dust removal rate:
High HCl removal rate:
Capacity:
Flue gas volume flow:
SO2 concentration:
up to 99 %
up to 70 %
up to 80 %
up to 99 %
4.8 Mio. m3/h (std,wet)

up to 30,000 mg/m3 (std,dry)
Applications:
Power stations (bituminous coal, lignite, fuel oil, ..)
Industry (cement, steel, ..)
10

Tailor made solutions for each application
Advantages:
11
Low operation cost
Low maintenance costs
Limestone as available and cheap absorbent
Producing marketable gypsum

One process step for various pollutants
Water
Clean
gas
Raw gas
Gypsum
Oxidation air
Limestone
12
Removing of acidic gaseous

pollutants (SOX, HCl, HF) and
dust
WET Limestone FGD Process and Auxiliary Systems

Highly efficient and maintenance friendly
Absorber, Oxidation
Air System, Slurry
Recirculation
Waste Water
Discharge
Ash Removal
System
Gypsum
Dewatering
and Storage
System
13
Limestone Storage,
Slurry Preparation
System
FGDplus as Enhancement of the Open Spray Tower

Reduced investment as well as operation costs
Redispersed
Droplets
Liquid
Bulk
Raw
Gas
Velocity magnitude (regions only) [m/s]
Scrubber with adapted mass-transfer regime
Optimized combination of high removal and fine removal
within the absorption zone
Increase SO2-removal efficiency for high inlet concentration
Maximize dust, aerosol and HM removal
Decrease of invest costs
Number of spray banks
Absorber height (sump, absorption zone)
Pump size
Decrease of operation costs
Pressure at nozzles
Decrease of liquid to gas ratio
Optimized behavior at variable load conditions
Capacity:
Flue gas volume:
up to 4.8 Mio. m3/h (std,wet)
SO2 concentration: up to 30,000 mg/m3 (std,dry)
Applications:
Upgrade of existing absorber
New installations
14
Basic Wet Flue Gas Cleaning Chemistry

Overall chemical reactions
Sorbent
Wet FGD Process Product
Ca(OH)2
SO2
CaSO3 * H2O +
H2O
(1)
Ca(OH)2
SO3
CaSO4 * H2O +
H2O
(2)
Ca(OH)2
SO2
CaSO4 * H2O +
H2O
(3)
O2
CaSO4 * H2O
CaSO3 * H2O +
15
O2
Ca(OH)2
CO2
CaCO3
Ca(OH)2
2 HCl
CaCl2 * 2 H2O
Ca(OH)2
2 HF
CaF2
(4)
+
H2O
(5)
(6)
2 H2O
(7)
Basic Sorbent Requirements for Wet Flue Gas Cleaning

Sorbent quality significantly impacts the system efficiency
Limestone
Unit
minimum
preferred
CaCO3
[wt. %]
> 90
> 95
MgCO3 *)
[wt. %]
< 4.0
< 2.0
Inerts
[wt. %]
< 6.0
< 3.0
Grain size distribution d90 (powder)
[m]
< 63 90
< 44 63
Grain size (pebbles)**)
[mm]
< 80
according to Andritz standard

reactivity test
[/to]
~ 35 55
Reactivity
Average middle European price
*)
**)
16
Considered as soluble and reactive

In case of onsite crushing and milling plant
Basic Wet Flue Gas Cleaning Performance Figures

High removal efficiencies for various trace components
Removed trace component
normal
maximum
Sulphur dioxide
SO2
[%]
90 - 97
~ 99
Sulphur trioxide
SO3
[%]
50 - 60
~ 70
Hydrochloride
HCl
[%]
90 - 97
~ 99
Hydrofluoride
HF
[%]
95 - 97
~ 99
[%]
50 - 75
~ 80
[%]
75 - 80
~ 95
Particulate matter
Mercury *)
Hg
Heavy metals **)

*)
**)
17
Unit
[%]
for oxidized Mercury

Sb, As, Pb, Cr, Co, Cu, Mn, Ni, V, Sn
Mainly accomplished by pre

wet FGD dust removal
DRY Flue Gas Desulphurization (D-FGD)

Circulating dry scrubbing (CDS)
DRY Flue Gas Cleaning Based on CFB Technology

Basic process characteristics
19

No moving parts in the flue gas path
Circulating fluidized bed
with intense and turbulent
contact between solid
sorbent and flue gas
Filter designed for very high solids amounts
Water injection for

re-activation of
absorbent
Water
Hydrated lime
CFD optimized
turboreactor inlet
including venturi
nozzle(s)
20
Raw gas
from boiler
Clean
gas
Product recirculation and discharge

Single step process for high removal efficiencies
Dry flue gas cleaning optimized by advanced CFD tools

Dry flue gas cleaning is based on fluidized bed technology
Removing of acid gaseous pollutants (SO2, HCl, HF)
Low investment costs
Applicable for installation up to 600 MWel
Performance data:
Water
Hydrated
Lime
Raw gas
from boiler
Clean
gas
FGD product
(for disposal mainly)

High dust removal rate:
High HCl removal rate:
up to 99 %
up to 99 %
up to 99.99 %
up to 99 %
Capacity:
Flue gas volume flow: 50,000 to 1.2 Mio. m3/h (std, wet)
SO2 inlet concentration: up to 20,000 mg/m3 (std, dry)
Application:
21
Small to middle sized power stations

Industry (cement, steel, ..), EfW and biomass plants
CDS Process and Auxiliary Systems

A simple system for high performance
Sorbent System
Turboreactor, Baghouse Filter,
Product Recirculation System
Process Water
Product Discharge System

22
Basic Dry Flue Gas Cleaning Chemistry

Overall chemical reactions
Sorbent
Dry FGD Process Product
Ca(OH)2
SO2
CaSO3 * H2O +
H2O
(1)
Ca(OH)2
SO3
CaSO4 * H2O +
H2O
(2)
Ca(OH)2
SO2
CaSO4 * H2O +
H2O
(3)
O2
CaSO4 * H2O
CaSO3 * H2O +
23
O2
Ca(OH)2
CO2
CaCO3
Ca(OH)2
2 HCl
CaCl2 * 2 H2O
Ca(OH)2
2 HF
CaF2
(4)
+
H2O
(5)
(6)
2 H2O
(7)
Basic Sorbent Requirements for Dry Flue Gas Cleaning

Sorbent quality significantly impacts the system efficiency
Hydrated lime Ca(OH)2
Unit
minimum
preferred
Content of free, reactive Ca(OH)2
[wt. %]
> 80
> 90
Moisture
[wt. %]
<2
<1
Specific surface (BET-method)
[m2/g]
> 15
> 18
Grain size distribution d50
[m]
<8
<5
[/to]
Burnt lime CaO*)
Unit
minimum
preferred
Content of free, reactive CaO

not sintered, soft burnt
[wt. %]
> 85
> 90
Rest CO2
[wt. %]
<5
<3
t60 value
[min]
<4
<2
Mean particle diameter d50
[mm]
<2
< 0,2
[/to]
*)
24
In case of onsite hydration plant

~ 150 180
~ 70 100
Basic Dry Flue Gas Cleaning Performance Figures

High removal efficiencies for various trace components
Removed trace component
normal
maximum
Sulphur dioxide
SO2
[%]
90 - 95
~ 99
Sulphur trioxide
SO3
[%]
95 - 98
~ 99
Hydrochloride
HCl
[%]
90 - 97
~ 99
Hydrofluoride
HF
[%]
95 - 97
~ 99
[%]
99.9 99.95
~ 99.99
[%]
90 - 95
~ 97
[%]
95 98
~ 99
Particulate matter
Mercury
Hg
Heavy metals *)
*)
25
Unit
Sb, As, Pb, Cr, Co, Cu, Mn, Ni, V, Sn
Basic Dry Flue Gas Cleaning Arrangement

Compact layout and small footprint
26

Compact layout and small footprint for 2 x 145 MWel
27

Revised design reduces investment costs significantly
28
Dry Flue Gas Cleaning in Operation

A view into the Turboreactor beneath the venturi nozzles
29
WET or DRY Flue Gas Desulphurisation Solutions

A comparison of two well proven technologies
Wet FGD versus Dry FGD

Operation costs versus investment costs
About 85 to 90 % of installed FGDs worldwide are based on wet technology.
The reasons are mainly lower operational cost (cheap limestone can be used,
dry FGDs operate with more expensive burnt lime) and the production of
commercial grade gypsum.
However, there are also arguments for dry FGD. For certain applications and for
smaller power stations dry FGD might be the better solution. Which are the
selection criteria to choose the right system?
Dry FGD
Wet FGD
31
Selection Criteria WET versus DRY FGD (1 of 3)

Sorbent costs and basic design parameters
Parameter
WET FGD
DRY FGD
100,000 4,800,000
m3/h (std, wet)
50,000 1,200,000
m3/h (std, wet)
~ 1,100 MWel
~ 150 MWel (lignite)

~ 300 MWel (hard coal)
SO2 removal efficiency
> 99 %
up to 99 % (95 %)
Sorbent consumption
CaCO3 (limestone)
SF 1.03
CaO / Ca(OH)2
SF 1.3 1,8 (depending
on removal efficiency)
Sorbent costs
(middle European)
35 /to
70 /to
Water consumption
100 %
80 %
Possible dust inlet

concentration
< 200 mg/m3 (std, dry)

Dust removal in wet
FGD limited
< 125 g/m3 (std, dry)

High dust removal in
dry FGD
Flue gas volume

Installed boiler
capacity
32
Remark
Capacity just for
information, flue gas
volume is decisive
Yearly operating
hours to be
considered
Dry FGD may be

interesting for retrofit
(ESP performance
in old plants)

Beneficial product use and waste discharge
Parameter
WET FGD
DRY FGD
Remark
SO3 removal
< 50 %
> 99 %
Important for oil fired

boilers
FGD product
Commercial grade
gypsum
OR disposal gypsum
Product for disposal

(CaSO3/CaSO4)
Is beneficial product
use required?
What are the
disposal costs?
Waste water
If commercial grade
gypsum is produced,
waste water has to be
discharged
Waste water free

system
Can waste water be

discharged?
What kind of waste
water treatment is
required?
higher
lower
~ 30 Mo
~ 24 Mo
Lower pressure drop

especially for part load
Lower power
consumption for
auxiliary equipment
Maintenance cost
Erection period
Power consumption /
pressure drop
33
Has to checked on a
case by case basis

Boundary conditions for retrofit projects
Parameter
WET FGD
DRY FGD
Remark
Condition of existing
stack
Existing stack has to

be modified in all
cases long outage
of boiler
Existing stack can most

of the times be used
without modification
Stack condition has

to checked in case
of dry FGD
application
Boiler ID fan
Lower pressure drop

possible that
existing ID fan can be
modified and used
20 100 %
20 100 %
Flue gas
recirculation < 60 %
is necessary for dry
FGD applications
Saturation temperature
50 60 C
75 85 C
Required stack
outlet temperature
has to be checked
Operation flexibility
Flue gas temperature

at FGD outlet
34
WET versus DRY FGD Case Study 1 (Lignite)

660 MWel, 11,000 mg/m3 (std, dry) 2.8 Mio. m3/h (std, wet)
Parameter
WET FGD
DRY FGD
Sorbent consumption
48 to/h
50 to/h
Sorbent costs per year
~ 11.8 Mio.
24.5 Mio.
1 wet scrubber
3 dry scrubbers
(7,000 operating hours)
Equipment
Remark
12.7 Mio. higher
sorbent costs per
year for dry FGD
Water consumption
Electrical power
consumption
Invest costs
*)
Emission limit: 200 mg/m (std, dry)
Based on usual boundary conditions and

requirements only a wet FGD installation is
financially reasonable
35
WET versus DRY FGD Case Study 2 (Hard Coal)

200 MWel, 3,500 mg/m3 (std, dry) 0.7 Mio. m3/h (std, wet)
Parameter
WET FGD
DRY FGD
Sorbent consumption
3.9 to/h
3.4 to/h
Sorbent costs per year
~ 0.82 Mio.
1.43 Mio.
1 wet scrubber
1 dry scrubber
38 m3/h
28 m3/h
Less with dry FGD
Electrical power
consumption
~ 2,000 kWh/h
~ 1,500 kWh/h
Less with dry FGD
Amount of FGD
product
8.0 to/h
Gypsum
6.0 to/h
Landfill
Landfill costs have

to be evaluated
Waste water discharge
1.5 m3/h
100 %
70 %
(6,000 operating hours)
Equipment
Water consumption
Invest costs
*)
36
Emission limit: 200 mg/m (std, dry)

Remark
0.61 Mio. higher
sorbent costs per
year for dry FGD
Dry FGD can be

used as waste water
sink
Executive Summary
The market share of CDS based FGD systems will increase
The Andritz Turbo-CDS technology has been installed in 21 coal fired
power plants (35 turboreactor trains) in Europe, China and USA with a total
capacity of > 2,000 MWel.
Due to numerous advantages in comparison to wet FGD and semi-dry
spray absorption the CDS based technology has gained a considerable
share in the flue gas cleaning market
Most important is the possibility to remove nearly all pollutants apart from
CO and NOx in one process step
The CDS technology is waste water free and can be used as waste water
sink
Single vessel units for boiler sizes up to 300 MWel are state of the art
37
Projects under execution

ANDRITZ air pollution control
Karlsruhe, Germany
Customer: EnBW
Start Up: 2012
Wet limestone FGD

Technical data:
Fuel:
Hard coal
Capacity:
1 x 910 MWel
Flue gas volume:
2,500,000 m/h (std,wet)
SO2 inlet:
3,800 mg/m (std,dry)
Removal efficiency:
> 95%
Technology/Supply:
ESP, ash handling system, flue gas system, absorber,
limestone slurry supply, gypsum dewatering and
storage, installation & commissioning
39
Lnen, Germany
Customer: Trianel
Start Up: 2012, Consortium: SIEMENS / IHI / AE&E
Wet limestone FGD

Technical data:
Fuel:
Hard coal
Capacity:
800 MWel
Flue gas volume:
2,000,000 m/h (std,wet)
SO2 inlet:
Removal efficiency:
95.0%
Technology/Supply:
Civil engineering, absorber, ducts, limestone slurry
supply, gypsum dewatering and storage, booster fan,
waste water treatment plant, installation &
commissioning
40
Turceni, Romania
Customer: SC Complexul Energetic,Turceni SA
Start Up: 2012
Wet limestone FGD

Technical data:
Fuel:
Lignite
Capacity:
4 x 330 MWel
Flue gas volume:
2,800,000 m/h (std,wet)
SO2 inlet:
Removal efficiency:
96.4%
Technology/Supply:
Turnkey plant, 4 absorbers, flue gas system incl. flue
gas fans, limestone slurry preparation plant, gypsum
dewatering and storage, installation & commissioning
41
Ledvice, Czech Republic

Customer: CEZ a.s.
Start Up: 2013
Wet limestone FGD

Technical data:
Fuel:
Lignite
Capacity:
1 x 660 MWel
Flue gas volume:
2,517,800 m/h (std,wet)
SO2 inlet:
Removal efficiency:
> 96%
Technology/Supply:
Civil works, absorber, ducts, limestone storage and
slurry system, gypsum dewatering system, installation
& commissioning Turnkey project
42
Prunerov, Czech Republic

Customer: CEZ a.s., Skoda Praha Invest
Start Up: 2014
Wet limestone FGD

Technical data:
Fuel:
lignite
Capacity:
3 x 250 MWel
Flue gas volume:
3 x 1,010,800 m/h (std,wet)
SO2 inlet:
Removal efficiency:
89,2%
Technology/Supply:
Turnkey wet FGD plant, 3 absorbers, auxiliary
systems
43
Slovnaft, Slovak Republic

Customer: MOL, Slovnaft a.s
Start Up: 2011
Wet limestone FGD

Technical data:
Fuel:
Mixed petroleum residue
Capacity:
820 MWth
(5 existing, 2 new boilers)
Flue gas volume:
2 x 505,000 m/h (std,wet)
SO2 inlet:
Removal efficiency:
93.1%
Dust outlet:
20 mg/m (std,dry)
Technology/Supply:
Turnkey FGD plant after refinery power plant,
2 absorbers, steam reheater, limestone preparation,
gypsum dewatering, 2 gypsum silos
44
Ludwigshafen, Germany
Customer: BASF
Start Up: 2012
Dry sorption
Technical data:
45
Fuel:
Waste water sludge
Flue gas volume:
2 x 80,000 m/h (std,wet)
Hg inlet:
0.3 mg/m (std,dry)
Hg outlet:
0.03 mg/m (std,dry)
PCDD/PCDF inlet:
12 ngTE/m (std,dry)
Sorbent:
Activated carbon
Yunus Emre, Turkey

Customer: Adularaja Enerji
Start Up: 2013, Installed after CFB boiler without pre-dedusting
Dry FGD (Turbo CDS with ESP)

Technical data:
46
Fuel:
Lignite
Capacity:
2 x 145 MWel
Sulfur content:
up to 3.5%
Flue gas volume:
2 x 610,000 m/h (std,wet)
SO2 inlet:
up to 15,000 mg/m (std,dry)

1,100 mg/m (std,dry) to TS
SO2 in clean gas:
< 200 mg/m (std,dry)
SO2 removal:
> 80 % in TS plant
> 98.5 % total
Sorbent:
CaO and fly ash from CFB

boiler
Timisoara, Romania
Customer: Community Timisoara
Start Up: 2013
Dry FGD (Turbo-CDS)

Technical data:
Fuel:
coal
Capacity:
150 MWel
Flue gas volume:
650,000 m/h (std,wet)
SO2 inlet:
Removal efficiency:
93.1%
Dust outlet:
20 mg/m (std,dry)
Technology/Supply:
Turnkey Turbo CDS plant after coal-fired CFB boiler,
CDS-reactor, fabric filter, absorbent storage and
preparation, product handling and storage.
47
Tocopilla, Chile
Customer: AES
Start Up: 2013, 2014
Dry FGD (Turbo CDS)

Technical data:
Fuel:
coal
Capacity:
2 x 140 MWel
Flue gas volume:
2 x 600,000 m/h (std,wet)
SO2 inlet:
Removal efficiency:
80 %
Dust outlet:
45 mg/m (std,dry)
Technology/Supply:
Turnkey Turbo CDS plant after coal-fired power plant, 2
reactors, fabric filters, absorbent storage and preparation,
product handling and storage, desalination plant
48
Ventanas, Chile
Customer: AES
Start Up: 2013, 2014
Dry FGD (Turbo CDS)

Technical data:
Fuel:
coal
Capacity:
1 x 120 MWel, 1 x 220 MWel
Flue gas volume:
1 x 550,000 m/h (std,wet)

1 x 910,000 m/h (std,wet)
SO2 inlet:
Removal efficiency:
80 %
Dust outlet:
15 mg/m (std,dry)
Technology/Supply:
Turnkey Turbo-CDS plant after coal fired power plant, 1 reactor,
fabric filters, absorbent storage and preparation, product
handling and storage, desalination plant
49
ANDRITZ Energy & Environment GmbH

Waagner-Biro-Platz 1
8074 Raaba, Austria
Phone: +43 (316) 501 0
Fax: +43 (316) 501 482
info@aee-austria.at
www.andritz.com/aee
Legal Disclaimer
All data, information, statements, photographs, and graphic illustrations contained in this presentation are
without any obligation to the publisher and raise no liabilities to ANDRITZ AG or any affiliated companies, nor
shall the contents in this presentation form part of any sales contracts, which may be concluded between
ANDRITZ GROUP companies and purchasers of equipment and/or systems referred to herein.
ANDRITZ AG 2010. All rights reserved. No part of this copyrighted work may be reproduced, modified or
distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in any database or retrieval system, without the prior written
permission of ANDRITZ AG or its affiliates. Any such unauthorized use for any purpose is a violation of the
relevant copyright laws.
51
Flue Gas Cleaning Expert Conference 2011, ANDRITZ Energy & Environment

FGD Retrofit Options

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

FGD Retrofit Options

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ANDRITZ air pollution control

Hightech solutions are often based on simple ideas

Energy Community Workshop, October 2012

Energy Community Workshop

Overview of the Andritz Group

ANDRITZ Energy & Environment

The ANDRITZ GROUP

ANDRITZ Energy & Environment

PULP & PAPER

Systems for the

Equipment for the

Systems for the

* Long-term average share of the ANDRITZ GROUPs total order intake

ANDRITZ Energy & Environment GmbH company presentation October 2012

FEED & BIOFUEL

Systems for the

Strengthening of the Market Position

PULP & PAPER

FEED & BIOFUEL

ANDRITZ Energy & Environment

Sales of the ANDRITZ GROUP (MEUR)

Important Key Figures Q2 and H1 2012 at a Glance

Order backlog (as of end of period)

Net income (including non-controlling interests)

Cash flow from operating activities

Employees (as of end of period)

ANDRITZ Energy & Environment

Relative share price performance of the ANDRITZ

ANDRITZ Energy & Environment

Air Pollution Control within ANDRITZ

Steam generators and plants

ANDRITZ Energy & Environment

Power plant services

WET Flue Gas Desulphurisation (W-FGD)

WET Limestone Flue Gas Desulphurization

4.8 Mio. m3/h (std,wet)

ANDRITZ Energy & Environment

WET Limestone Flue Gas Desulphurization

Low operation cost

Low maintenance costs

Limestone as available and cheap absorbent

Producing marketable gypsum

ANDRITZ Energy & Environment

WET Limestone Flue Gas Desulphurization

ANDRITZ Energy & Environment

Removing of acidic gaseous

WET Limestone FGD Process and Auxiliary Systems

ANDRITZ Energy & Environment

FGDplus as Enhancement of the Open Spray Tower

ANDRITZ Energy & Environment

Basic Wet Flue Gas Cleaning Chemistry

Wet FGD Process Product

ANDRITZ Energy & Environment

Basic Sorbent Requirements for Wet Flue Gas Cleaning

Grain size distribution d90 (powder)

Grain size (pebbles)**)

according to Andritz standard

Considered as soluble and reactive

ANDRITZ Energy & Environment

Basic Wet Flue Gas Cleaning Performance Figures

Heavy metals **)

for oxidized Mercury

ANDRITZ Energy & Environment