Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/jcsr
Abstract
This paper deals with the behaviour of composite beams with particular focus on the effective slab width, which is required for simplified
structural analysis and design. Current design codes propose values for the effective width which are mostly a function of the beam span
ignoring in this way the influence of other important parameters. Several 3D numerical simulations are conducted in this paper in order to
illustrate these parameters and accordingly a new methodology is suggested for evaluating the effective width. The proposed approach is easier to
apply in comparison with other existing methods based on stress integration, and provides effective width values which result in a more reliable
representation of the actual beam state when simplified analysis is carried out. The application of the new method indicates that the effective width
is mostly related to the actual slab width and, in many cases, the values obtained can significantly differ from those proposed in design codes.
Validation of the new approach is carried out through comparison of simplified 2D models with the results obtained from a recent experimental
investigation as well as from more complex 3D numerical simulations.
c 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Effective width; Shear lag; Composite beams
1. Introduction
The enhanced stiffness, strength and ductility of composite
steelconcrete beams in comparison with RC and steel
counterparts, which result from the synergy between the two
materials, have been recognised for many years [17,30]. The
consideration of this type of member in the design process is
treated in a similar manner to that of steel and RC members,
i.e. through the application of traditional T-section analysis and
employment of simplified 2D models for the structural analysis.
This simplification however involves a number of assumptions,
most notably regarding the definition of the portion of slab
mobilised, referred to as the effective width. When a composite
beam deforms, shear strains develop in the slab and cause a
shear lag effect. This consists of non-uniform distributions of
normal stresses across the slab width and the non-planarity of
the slab cross-section. The effective width allows consideration
of this effect and it is typically used both for the structural
analysis and design stages.
The effective widths prescribed by current design codes
were established many years ago and are based on research
Corresponding author.
1318
1
[x ] y=0
+ b2
b2
x dy.
(1)
tslab
2
t
+ slab
2
tslab
2
x dydz
b2
[x ] y=0 dz
(2)
1319
when compared to their European counterparts. In AISC 36005, no guidance is provided for continuous beams. However,
in the commentary document of the code [6], a simplified
approach is suggested for evaluating stiffness of continuous
composite beams which considers a weighted average of
second moments of area in the positive and negative bending
moment regions of the beam.
The effective width recommendations available in most
code provisions were derived on the basis of gravity loading
conditions. Therefore, different values of the effective width
would be expected for composite beams under lateral loading
conditions such as those due to seismic actions [21,16].
Eurocode 8 [14], specifically addresses this scenario by
proposing different effective widths to those prescribed in
Eurocode 4. In addition, Eurocode 8 also distinguishes between
effective widths for use in analysis and for strength calculations.
The values proposed are mostly a function of the span length
but are also dependent on column dimensions. Due to the
significant differences between the effective widths proposed in
Eurocode 4 and those proposed in Eurocode 8, designers may
encounter some difficulties during the design process.
In addition to the effective width proposals provided for
composite beams in building structures, similar recommendations are available for composite bridges. A detailed summary
and comparison of these proposals can be found elsewhere [4,
18]. It is worth mentioning that most provisions propose the effective width as a function of the span length and limited by the
distance between adjacent beams. However, in the AASHTO
specifications [1], the effective width is also a function of the
slab thickness. Another important observation is that most recommendations for building and bridge structures do not differentiate between effective widths for use in analysis and for
strength evaluation.
4. Detailed numerical assessment
1320
larger the slab width, the lower the shear stiffness. Two new
composite beams are analysed in which the slab widths are
taken equal to 1.5 m and 3.5 m, respectively. The mid-span
stress distributions at the mid-surface are plotted in Fig. 5. As
expected, the shear lag effect is more evident for larger slab
widths.
A second parameter which is directly related to the inplane shear stiffness of the slab is its thickness. For thicker
slabs, the shear stiffness is higher and therefore the presence
of shear lag is attenuated. This trend is illustrated by observing
the stress distributions plotted in Fig. 6. It is clear that when
the slab thickness is smaller, the variation of the longitudinal
1321
Fig. 8. Top surface longitudinal stress distributions across slab width at midspan for increasing levels of deformation.
1322
Fig. 11. Top surface transverse stress distribution along the centreline of the
composite beam.
M
M
Ieq =
.
E Ieq
E
(3)
1323
1324
1325
E (N/mm2 )
f y (N/mm2 )
(%)
Structural steel
Reinforcing steel
210 000
210 000
317
554
1
2
Table 2
Concrete properties of the B4 specimen
Property (N/mm2 )
Value
E
fc
ft
36 744
41.60
3.32
with the case when the code effective width (L/4) is employed.
The excellent prediction provided by the 3D model is also
worth noting, although this model is computationally much
more demanding.
The local response is now examined by comparing the
momentcurvature relationships evaluated at the central region
of the composite beam which is under pure bending conditions.
The results from the various 2D models are compared with the
3D model due to absence of test results. In all the models,
the curvatures are obtained from the strain gradients of the
beam element representing the steel section, and the results
are presented in Fig. 20. The curves clearly illustrate the better
estimate provided by the 2D models adopting effective widths
larger than that proposed by the code. However it should be
mentioned that, for the same level of vertical deformation, large
effective widths lead to an overestimation of curvatures.
1326
K 2D /K 3D
b
0.8b
L/4 0.6b
1.03
0.97
0.89
1327