Professional Documents
Culture Documents
L1-3
PPT-2
L4-6
PPT-3
L7-9
PPT-4
L10-12
PPT-5
L13-15
2. You will have already encountered these concepts in school physics and in
undergraduate fluid mechanics/dynamics courses.
3. One way of stating the principle is: If an object is wholly or partially
immersed in a fluid its weight appears to be reduced by an amount equal to the
weight of the fluid it displaces.
5. These three conditions have important implications for the design and operation of any Underwater
Intervention System.
6. You may also recall from your previous studies that the total weight of an object can be considered
to act at an imaginary point called the Centre of Gravity* (G) whereas the weight of the fluid
displaced acts an imaginary point called the Centre of Buoyancy (B). The relative location of G and
B are also important factors in the design of underwater vehicles.
7. The fundamental concepts are well illustrated for a submarine in the following short video clip taken
from a US Navy training film of many years ago.
* Physicists usually prefer the term Centre of Mass
G T Reader Winter 2015
http://www.maritime.org/fleetsub/
http://www.noc.soton.ac.uk/JRD/HYDRO/argo/gallery/operation_park_profile.jpg
G T Reader Winter 2015
Horizontal Motion - 1
1. The profiling float does also move horizontally but in drift mode i.e., as a result of the
underwater currents. In most cases we also require the UIS to be able to move horizontally in a
desired direction and at a desired speed (velocity).
2. The desire for regulated and specified underwater* horizontal movement generally means we will
need some form of propulsion system for the UIS and if the underwater device is not reliant** on
a power feed from the surface, an onboard power system and energy convertor.
3. In recent years a novel solution to the horizontal-vertical motion needs has been developed based
on the buoyancy engines of the profiling float and Archimedess Law of Levers. These UISs are
called Underwater Gliders.
* Depending on the UIS we may also require horizontal movement on the water surface.
** Usually referred to as untethered.
Underwater Gliders
Bing images
Horizontal Motion - 2
1. If we wish to move the vehicle then we will have to overcome the resistance (drag) of the fluid to
the movement. Simply stated the power required to move the vehicle will then be;
Power = Drag Force x Velocity (speed)
2. The drag force will depend mainly on the form and shape of the underwater body and the viscosity
effects (skin-friction) of the fluid at the desired speed.
3. The drag force is proportional to the square of the velocity and hence:
Power Velocity3
4. These are two important relationships as they indicate that even a small increase in velocity will
require a significant increase in power and a large increase in drag. Thus, to reduce the power
requirement for a given speed the reduction of drag is a prime need.
5. The determination of drag forces is a complex subject.
6. Obviously a combination of vertical and horizontal motions will give us a wide-range of 3-D motions.
G T Reader Winter 2015
10
11
12
Two Centuries of
Combat Submarine Development
Soviet Typhoon
Class
Muscle Powered
Nuclear Powered
13
Relative Sizes
178m
Changzhou Tianning
Temple Pagoda
Typhoon
& Ohio
Class
German
Type XXI 1945
HMCS
Windsor
RCN c.
1990
Holland
Turtle c.
1776
14
The
st
21
Century
1. Despite the almost monopoly of the undersea environment by the military (except for fishing*) for
many decades there has been an increasing focus on the underwater environment for non-military
purposes especially over the past 40 years and in particular in this new millennium.
2. In some instances underwater activities over-lap between military and non-military uses. For
example, the acquisition of basic scientific data on the structure and composition of the oceans and
lakes is required for both purposes.
3. The need for the development of UISs, supporting instrumentation, and sensors has in turn lead to
the requirement for the knowledge base of engineers, scientists, and technologies to become more
common throughout their global communities via education programs and research activities.
4. There is then a growing need for more underwater engineers which will likely lead to an almost
exponential rise in career opportunities as the 21st Century progresses and the emphasis on
sustainable development becomes a key to the future health of the planet.
* Although fishing, commercial and recreational, is an underwater activity the operational and control of the endeavor is from either the surface of the sea or
from land except for a few exceptions.
G T Reader Winter 2015
15
2. However, in addition to Civil, Chemical (Petroleum), Mechanical, Materials, Electrical and Electronic
Engineers, there are Ocean Engineers (relatively new), Marine Engineers, Naval Engineers and Naval
Architects who are involved in what we can term underwater or subsea engineering.
3. As we shall see the involvement of System and Software engineers is becoming increasing
important in the underwater environment.
4. As we need to know the physical conditions of the environment or realm under which we, as
engineers, need to design, operate, and maintain the intervention systems then closer relationships
with specialized professions/scientists, in particular oceanographers, hydrographers, and military
strategists is crucial.
5. We also need to bear in mind that we must not repeat our historical ignorance of the sustainability
of land resources and the environmental impact of human activity as we move increasingly faster
to make greater use of the oceans.
G T Reader Winter 2015
16
17
18
http://www.srh.noaa.gov/jetstream//ocean/oceanprofile.htm
19
20
** Various Sources
21
This file is
licensed under
the Creative
Commons
AttributionShare Alike 3.0
Unported
license.
Attribution: I,
Kmusser
22
23
24
Underwater Realm
Density Variations & Layering
As with temperature variations the ocean waters can be divided into three density layers:
the less dense top layer the surface mixed zone;
the pycnocline zone, just mentioned, is a transition zone between the surface mixed
zone, and
the bottom layer where the water remains cold and dense.
The pycnocline is a major controlling element within the ocean system as we shall now see
in a recent video from the Scripps Institute of Oceanography by Professor Peter Franks. The
information contained will also be useful background for our study of Tides, waves and
currents.
25
26
27
28
Precise knowledge
of the properties of
layers is a major
requirement for
both stealth and
detection
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
http://www.smhi.se/en/theme/oxygen-in-the-sea-1.11274
38
39
40
41
42
3. Nevertheless early submarine communication was by wireless telegraphy using Morse code.
These submarines which more accurately should be called submersibles would be at or close to
the sea surface when receiving the signals through an antenna (aerial). Communication was
essentially one-way because of the limitations of vessels transmitter-antenna systems. Even so by
the 1920s* low frequency (16 kHz) signals could be sent to submerged submarines over a range of
3,000 miles (4,800 km) at a depth of just of 6m (21 ft.).
4. So why the need for acoustic communications?
* D F Rivera & R Bansal, Towed Antennas for US Submarine Communications: A Historical Perspective, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, Vol 46, No 1, p 23- 36, Feb 2004.
43
44
45
Underwater Realm
Sound & Acoustics - Measurement
1. The basic equation for determining the speed of sound in sea water is:
C = (1/)0.5 where is the adiabatic compressibility and is the density
2. Both and depend upon salinity, temperature and depth(pressure), it could be expected than an
analytical equation can be derived. While this is the case the accuracy of such an equation is
insufficient for accurate predictions and so a number of semi-empirical equations have been derived
but these are far from simple, e.g., The Mackenzie equation*:
C(T, S, z) = a1 + a2T + a3T2 + a4T3 + a5(S - 35) + a6z + a7z2 + a8T(S - 35) + a9Tz3
where T, S, and z are temperature in degrees Celsius, salinity in parts per thousand and depth in
meters, respectively. The constants a1, a2, ..., a9 are:
a1 = 1448.96, a2 = 4.591, a3 = -5.30410-2, a4 = 2.37410-4, a5 = 1.340,
a6 = 1.63010-2, a7 = 1.67510-7, a8 = -1.02510-2, a9 = -7.13910-13
3. The Mackenzie equation is accurate over a wide range of ocean conditions but there are other
equations which are more accurate over wider ranges they are also even more complicated.*
*http://resource.npl.co.uk/acoustics/techguides/seaabsorption/
G T Reader Winter 2015
46
Underwater Realm
Sound & Acoustics - Measurement
4. For our studies the actual numerical details of the speed of sound equations are not important. The
point is that even the expression for the speed of sound is complicated and is symptomatic of the
area of underwater acoustics. The need for actual measurement is paramount for accurate design
and operation of UISs.
5. In the same way as the operation of high altitude military aircraft provided our initial encounters with
the phenomenon we now call the jet-stream, the need to measure sound speed and acoustic
penetration at increasing depths lead not only to the development of deep diving scientific
submersibles, but also our encounter with the Deep Scattering Layer (DSL).
6. The DSL was discovered when apparently false readings of depth were obtained using echosounders. These false readings were also variable in value depending upon the time of day and the
geographical location of the measurement. This horizontal layer is caused by the vertical
movements of certain marine animals which scatter the sound waves. As with the jet-stream we
have found ways of overcoming the difficulties, but for some it provided a good hiding place for the
submarines of the nations who knew of its existence.
G T Reader Winter 2015
47
48
http://www.openhydro.com/company.html
http://www.marineturbines.com/SeaGen-Products
3. In our studies we focus more on UISs that could produce power from tides, rather than the effect
of tides on more conventional UISs, e.g., submarines.
G T Reader Winter 2015
49
50
* True in the Northern Hemisphere but in the Southern Hemisphere the direction is to the left. ** R
H Stewart, Chapter 9, Op Cit
G T Reader Winter 2015
51
*(http://www.enviroliteracy.org/article.php/545.html)
1. While the surface layers of the oceans are in constant motion as a result
of winds and tides, in deeper waters the ocean motion is due to
thermohaline circulation, which acts like a conveyor belt as the oceans
absorb, store, and redistribute vast amounts of solar energy around the
globe. Without this circulation, places at the same latitude across the
globe would generally have the same average temperatures. However,
because of this circulation, Norway located at similar latitude to
Manitoba, Canada has an average annual temperature that is nearly 20F
warmer*.
2. One lap of the conveyor belt will take a millennium or more.
3. In general, the very weak currents below the surface layers will not have
a significant impact on UISs design. However, the conveyor belt
circulation is considered to have monumental effects on our global
climate
4. Direct measurements of the properties of belt circulation can only be
made by UISs.
G T Reader Winter 2015
52
53
54
Next Lectures
In the next lecture on the (In)visible Ocean we will see how ocean engineers
and scientists together with computer specialists have been able to combine
most of our present knowledge about the underwater realm to produce a
visible topography of the oceans.
Then in the following lectures we will consider some of the attempts that have
already been made to design, develop, and operate UISs in this hostile
environment and in particular the efforts being made to use the oceans as a
source of renewable clean energy.
55
Underwater Intervention
Systems
92-590-54 & 88-590-28 21 January
92-590-64 & 88-590-38 15 January
Lectures 4-6
56
2. We found that the physical characteristics of the oceans, especially vertically, are hugely
different from those we encounter on land.
3. Water* is at least 800 times more dense than air.
4. Pressure rapidly increases with depth at a rate of 1 atmosphere per every 10 metres.
5. For underwater operations, especially vehicular buoyancy effects are the prime controlling
factor.
6. The oceans are virtually impenetrable to visible light** and radio waves, except near to the
surface layers.
7. Acoustics play a major role in the operation of UISs
* In the case of standard sea-water the factor is 832.
** Which is a form of EM radiation
G T Reader Winter 2015
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
Bing Images
64
65
66
67
Nuclear Powered
Royal Navy
US Navy
Russian Navy
German Navy
Royal Australian
Navy
68
69
Examples of Submersibles - 1
Slingsby LR5, submarine
rescue submersible operated
by the Royal Navy. Can
operate at depths to 2,000 ft.
Built by Slingsby of Yorkshire,
UK.
Pisces IV examines the wreck of
an American landing craft from
WWII. Image courtesy of Terry
Kerby, Hawai'i Undersea Research
Laboratory. Can operate to 6,500
ft. Built by International
Hydrodynamics of Vancouver,
B.C., Canada .
G T Reader Winter 2015
Examples of Submersibles 2
71
72
3. In recent times the most popular underwater recreational UISs has become the Diver
Propulsion Vehicle** (DPV) or underwater scooter, but manned, shallow depth submersibles
have also been built, or are under investigation or development.
4. A detailed study of these recreational vehicles is out of the scope of this course but as they
appear to be increasingly popular, and are part of a growing commercial enterprise, we shall
briefly review the application area.
* On average 80% of visible light is absorbed by the time this depth is reached.
** Also used by Naval Special Forces
73
74
Sportsub wet
submersible
G T Reader Winter 2015
75
seabobamerica.com
Aqua Star (of Florida USA) AS 2
Underwater Scooter
http://www.hydrodome.com/hydrobob.html
76
77
78
79
80
81
Cod & The Northwest Atlantic are not the only problem
Oceanworld.tamu.edu
There are many examples of overfishing and ignorant fishing as shown in the diagrams above but
there is a third factor ocean acidification which is also considered to impact the marine-life food
chains above the pycnocline. This acidification is thought to be due to the increases in atmospheric
CO2 caused by fossil fuel usage although this is not universally accepted.
http://www.terpconnect.umd.edu/~mvanhove/climatemyth.html
G T Reader Winter 2015
82
http://pmel.noaa.gov/co2/file/Puget+Sou
nd+Cast
83
84
http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/LOP/researchpublications/prb0807-e.pdf
G T Reader Winter 2015
86
Oil Resources
1. There are 4 main types of offshore drilling of
which three are in common use, semisubmersibles, jackups (platform legs on sea floor)
and drill-ships. In all cases ROVs are used to
support rig maintenance and diver operations,
pipeline laying and pipeline inspections. The
drilling operations themselves can be considered
to be UISs but we generally see just the surface
portions of the oil platforms themselves. The
drilling depths are getting increasingly deeper and
further from the coastline.
2. Offshore is particularly important for the USA but
the recent promising surveys from the Dakotas
may change the priority.
3. Offshore oil drilling, extraction and transportation
is an expensive activity.
G T Reader Winter 2015
http://www.thecqiscotland.org/North/n_reports.htm
88
The largest accidental oil spill in history, The Lakeview Gusher occurred on land in Kern County,
California 1910-1911, and released 1.2 million tons of US Crude. The recent, 2010, Deepwater
Horizon disaster in the Gulf of Mexico released 492,000 tons also in the Gulf of Mexico in 1979. The
IXTOC 1 spill released 454,000 tons.
* Mainly Modified from data and links on University of Texas A&M website http://oceanworld.tamu.edu
89
Exxon
Valdez
* Modified from University of Texas
A&M website
http://oceanworld.tamu.edu
90
Natural seepage accounts for 60% of oil in North American Marine waters.
http://oceanworld.tamu.edu
G T Reader Winter 2015
http://dels.nas.edu/global/osb/Pollution-In-The-Ocean
91
*http://www.buzzle.com/articles/ocean-pollution-facts.html
G T Reader Winter 2015
92
4. The main Ocean Energy developments have been the use of tidal power and thermal energy. The
latter is known as OTEC (Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion) and uses the temperature difference
between the cooler deep and warmer surface ocean waters to run a heat engine.
93
BING Images
G T Reader Winter 2015
94
95
96
97
Note that the following website is worth visiting as a portal of information on energy research http://fern.acadiau.ca/fundy-tidalenergy-demonstration-facility.html
G T Reader Winter 2015
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
1.
2.
The concept of OTEC dates back to the latter part of the 19th
century and OTEC plants have been in operation for several
decades but on a relatively small scale.
3.
There are 3 main types of OTEC system, open-cycle, closedcycle, and hybrid cycle.
105
The Closed Cycle version is considered to have the highest efficiency and is the one which is attracting more present
day attention.
These diagrams have been taken from the paper On the ocean heat budget and ocean thermal energy conversion by Mohammed Faizal and M. Rafiuddin Ahmed, which has
been uploaded to the CLEW site.
G T Reader Winter 2015
106
107
Any Questions?
G T Reader Winter 2015
108
Underwater Intervention
Systems
L7-9 : Naval and Narco Submarines; Submarine
Developments & Technical Design Estimates (1)
109
Bing Images
G T Reader Winter 2015
110
111
2. As it was envisaged that the submarine would spend most of its time on the surface the
advanced porpoise-type hull shape designs were radically changed as these were excellent
for submerged operations but not ideal for surface operations. The main armament was to
be the deck gun although some would have torpedoes.
3. Internal Combustion engines were to provide surface propulsion and the new
electrochemical batteries were to power electrical motors when underwater. Prior to the
start of the war the German Navy successfully developed closed cycle kerosene (SparkIgnition (SI)) and Diesel (Compression-Ignition) engines which could be operated on the
surface and when submerged. The work was stopped completely when a worker was killed
in an explosion with the SI engine fuel system.
* An armistice was signed in 1918 but the peace treaty was not agreed until 1919 and indeed in Russia the war continued into the 1920s.
114
The 2nd World War started with the Japanese invasion of China in 1937, not the German invasion of Poland in 1939 or the attack on the Malay States (Malaysia) Hawaiian
Islands in 1941. It did not finally end until September 1945 .
1. The use of submarines quickly spread to the oceans and the underwater
campaigns by the British in the Gallipoli campaign, and the Germans in the 1st
Battle of Atlantic achieved some success. On the British side a significant number
of the submariners were Canadians.
2. Submarine operational tactics were in their infancy and the escorted convoy
system eventually negated the submarine threat.
3. Between the two major 20th century wars navies continued to develop submarines,
especially with regard to power systems, and again tried to use steam engines, but
the diesel-electrical system dominated. There were no game-changing advances in
either design or concepts of operational use until the 1937 1945* war. Advanced
submarines of the type developed by the Germans (shown in the next slide) were
still very much state-of-the art in terms of design concept over 20 years later.
115
* The U-Boat, Eberhard Rssler, Arms & Armour Press, 1989, ISBN
0-85368-115-5.
2. The British together with Canadian physicists started to develop sound location systems (ASDIC) which they
gave freely to the USA and which became SONAR (Sound Navigation and Ranging). At the same time
scientists all over the world were working on radio direction finding and radio navigation systems. A
successful system for detection and ranging was developed first by the British for enemy aircraft location in
the 1940s and became known as RADAR (Radio Detection and Ranging). Within a couple of years RADAR
systems could also detect submarines, and even the snorkel masts, forcing submarines deeper for longer.
3. With the increasing electronic transparency of the oceans, and the need to significantly improve what is
called the Indiscretion ratio (the ratio of time spent snorting to not snorting), towards the end of the
1937-45 War, and especially in the decade following, the design of submarines basically reverted to the hullshape concepts originally developed by J P Holland and the early pioneers for submerged operations.
4. The next big thing was the development of a successful underwater nuclear powerplant.
* Give Credit Where Credit Is Due, Mark C Jones, Journal of Military History, p987-1012, October 2005 available through the Leddy Library.
** The Dutch called the device a Snulver, the Germans - a Schnorkel, the British - a Snort and the Americans a Snorkel. ibid
117
2. It was perhaps only a matter of time before drug cartels began to use underwater vehicles
to transport illegal narcotics into countries such as the USA. Although most of these
vehicles are semi-submersibles, which skim the surface of the oceans to avoid detection,
recently discovered vehicles are true submersibles/submarines and they have used some
ingenious solutions to design and construct them.
3. These Narco UISs can carry between 5 and 10 tonnes of cocaine per trip.
4. As these illegal vessels have become more sophisticated (and are not subject to
operational and constructional codes!) the methods of interdicting them have had to
improve.
118
Narco
Submarines
and
Submersibles
119
Recap
2. In the analytical treatment that follows, the equation numbers refer to those used in
Chapter 3 of the previously citied book by Hawley, Nuckols, Reader and Potter whose
work will be used in this part of the course.
3. To start with we will assume that the buoyancy (weight-displacement) and stability
requirements have been met for the vehicles under consideration.
We saw earlier that the propulsive power required is drag (or resistance to motion) times the desired
velocity. In the first instance then an understanding of the resistance that will oppose the motion is required.
122
123
So now that we have the basic relationships we will first use the Hydrodynamic approach
to estimate the drag resistance, and hence the propulsive power requirements.
Hydrodynamics, as previously mentioned, is the study of the physics of motion and action
of water as compared to Aerodynamics, which is a similar study but with air as the medium.
The principles of fluid mechanics and dynamics apply equally to both hydrodynamics and
aerodynamics but of course underwater we are dealing with a liquid.
124
125
This is also known as the skin drag or sometimes viscosity drag and is found from
basic fluid mechanics such that:
126
There is a large body of analytical work on attempts to determine the values of these various coefficients.
Numerical analysis has become both increasingly popular as advanced computational facilities have been
developed and more readily accessible, but nevertheless model testing is still required. Each coefficient has
a range of values depending upon the type of vehicle, the envisaged mission, and the work-site environment
(ocean properties).
127
Frictional Resistance, Cf
While there are a number of different semi-analytical expressions for the frictional resistance
coefficient none are universally accepted although the most commonly accepted* is:
128
In order to determine the various coefficients required in design calculations, tow or towing tanks are
constructed where dimensionally similar models can be pulled through the water at various speeds with
specified wave types and the resistance to the motion determined. Many of the major maritime nations plus
a small number of universities have these facilities*. The tanks have high capital and operating costs and
require expert technical support. They are constructed to ITTC (see previous slides) specifications and
operate in terms of experimental methodology** in accordance with ITTC procedures.
Example of a
Tow Tank
** http://ittc.sname.org/2002_recomm_proc/7.5-02-03-01.1.pdf
129
Residual Resistance, Cr
Table 3.1
130
To complete the calculation for the bare hull resistance (eqn 3.4) we need to
evaluate the surface roughness correlation allowance, Cf and the wave making
resistance, Cw. In the latter case this resistance can be ignored if the UISs is
operating at depths greater than the equivalent of 5 hull diameters.
As its description implies, the coefficient, Cf takes account of the resistance due
to the roughness of the bare hull and the holes which are required for venting
or taking on ballast, and several other factors. Typical values for this coefficient
vary between 0.0004 to 0.0009 depending upon the vehicle/UIS. For nuclear
submarines a range of 0.00052 to 0.0007 has been suggested*.
Once we have sufficient information for the bare hull resistance then we will
need to evaluate (estimate) the appendage resistance in order to use eqn. 3.1 to
eqn. 3.3 to determine the propulsive power needs of the UIS.
* V Bukalov and A Narusbayev, Atomic Powered Submarine Design, Sudostroyeniy Publishing House, Leningrad, USSR ( 1964) now St. Petersburg, Russia.
131
Once again as the name implies the appendage resistance is caused by those physical
features which stick out from the basic hull shape. In the case of naval submarines, these
features will include the conning tower (fin or sail), snorkel, and other masts, sonar domes
etc. In commercial UISs these include the robotic arms and exostructure. The exostructure
is defined* as the framework on which everything else hangs: the pressure hull being
merely one of the cargo units suspended within or beneath it.
(3.8)
* W Penzias and M W Goodman, Man Beneath the Sea, Wiley & Son, New York, USA ,1973.
133
Appendage Resistance - 2
134
Appendage Resistance - 3
1. In one of the standard and most important books on underwater vehicle design,
Allmendinger*, has presented a table of coefficients for appendage resistance based on the
type of appendage .
2. Because of the difficulties of separating and precisely defining drag elements in eqn. 3.5,
other than Cf, some designers have adopted a more pragmatic approach.
* EE Allmendinger (Ed), Submersible Vehicle Systems Design, SNAME publication, 1990, ISBN 0-939773-06-6.
135
developments in computational fluid dynamics. However for initial estimates of the total
drag coefficient, Ct, the simple algorithms developed for Hoerner* in the 1960s are still very
useful. These are based on a particular range of hull geometries and can be applied if the
frontal area or the wetted surface area are known or can be calculated.
(3.10)
(3.11)
*S F Hoerner, Fluid Dynamic Drag, Self-published, 1965 Occasionally copies become available on sites like Bookfinder
136
2. The concept of using actual data from a number of vehicles to produce single analytical
expressions which can be used for propulsive power estimates and which take into
account the physical parameters of the UIS usually a submarine/submersible were
developed further in the 1980s. This parametric approach will be dealt with in the next
series of slides.
3. Of course the navies of the world and some commercial designers have very
sophisticated computational methods and programs for calculating power requirements
based on hydrodynamics and coefficients based on actual vehicle and model testing.
These represent Classified or Proprietary information. Thus, other researchers have to
use open literature information in preliminary propulsive power estimates.
137
138
* H A Jackson, Submarine Parametrics, paper #3, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Naval Submarines, RINA, London, UK, 1983.
** V L Russo, H Turner and F W Wood., Submarine Tankers, SNAME, Vol 68, pp 693-728, November 1960, presented at the annual meeting.
139
140
Jacksons Equation
(3.13)
141
142
Hull Shape - 2
1. Most submarines have a parallel middle body section. This is due to a number of
requirements. Firstly, maximum draft size is generally determined by the depth
of water in harbors and the size of dry docks rather than an inability to make the
submarine larger in diameter. Secondly, if more displacement is required (as in
the case of a nuclear weapons fit) and the diameter cannot be increased, then
this results in an extra section of parallel middle body being inserted at the point
of maximum diameter.
2. Hull forms have certain geometric characteristics which influence drag resistance.
Three of the major geometric parameters that strongly influence vehicle
resistance are the L/D ratio, the prismatic coefficient, and the wetted surface
area*.
** B R Clayton, Mechanics of Marine Vehicles, Springer Publishers, ISBN 0-419-12110-2.
143
Hull Shape 3
144
Hull Shape - 4
Figure 3.9 shows the resistance of deeply submerged, steadily moving,
submarines each with a volume of displacement of about 2800 m3,
deduced from model tests on bare hulls. As the slenderness ratio
increases there is a decrease in viscous pressure resistance and a
corresponding increase in vessel surface area, skin friction, pressure
gradient over the rear of the body, and the size of the wake. Alternatively,
a reduction in the slenderness ratio increases both the size of the wake
and the viscous pressure resistance. Between these two extremes is a
minimum value of total resistance which occurs when the slenderness
ratio is about 6. The geometry of the USS Albacore, point 1 on the
diagram, is seen to be near the optimum, which accounts for its success
when operating fully submerged. The USS Nautilus, point 4, was a test
bed for a nuclear power plant and not shape optimized. It is interesting
to note that the Holland submarine of 1895 had a slenderness ratio of
5.26!
Fig. 3.9 is from Hawley et al, 1996 Op Cit.
E S Arentzen and P Mandel, Naval Architecture Aspects of Submarine Design, Trans SNAME Vol 68, p 622676, 1960.
G T Reader Winter 2015
145
146
(3.16)
* I W Dand, The Naval Architecture of an Unmanned Submarine , Trans Institute of Marine Engineers, Vol. 104, Pt 4, p233 -253, 1991.
** S F Hoerner, 1965, Op. Cit.
G T Reader Winter 2015
147
* With consistent
units
**
C Hillenbrand, AUV Primary and Hovering Propulsion Systems Conceptual Design, NUSC, Newport, RI, USA, Report TM #87-2101,1987
148
149
(3.14)
Where:
150
(3.15)
Subscripts c and v refer to the umbilical cable and vehicle respectively.
Typical values of Cd are 1.2 for cables and 0.8 for vehicles based on the frontal area being used as the
characteristic area for non-dimensional coefficients. Obviously, thrust must equal drag when the
vehicle is not accelerating. If we determine the drag resistance then we can estimate the power
requirements using a rule-of-thumb approach whereby a thrust of 160 to 180 Newtons can be
produced for every 0.75 kW of power. This rule-of-thumb was developed by the Canadian company
International Submarines (ISE) based on extensive and thorough testing of various ROVs.*
* Hawley et al, 1996, Op Cit
151
152
1. Now we know the drag resistances we can calculate the estimated power requirements using the ISE
rule-of-thumb of say 220 N per kW to show that the power required to propel the cable will be 10.9
kW and for the vehicle, 1.75 kW. From which it is clear that improving (streamlining) the vehicle
geometry will not significantly change the power requirements due to the overriding influence of the
cable drag.
2. The actual power requirements will likely be higher than these rough estimates because of a number
of factors associated with the operational mission of the ROV. For example the value of the drag
coefficients, Cd, will vary according to the direction taken by the vehicle, i.e., up, down, sideways,
reverse, and moreover the interaction of the water flow in open structured vehicles and those with
appendages will impose additional resistances. It should also be noted that the length of the cable
and the depth of operation will have two different values because the cable hangs in the water. The
cable length will then be approximately 20% longer than the operating depth.
3. When all these factors are taken into consideration, and depending upon the energy conversion
efficiency of the thrusters (motor-propeller combination), the estimated power requirements may
have to be factored by as much as 3 to achieve the operational power needs*.
* J M Anderson and D R Yoerger, Autonomous Bethnic Explorer Model Development, Intervention 92 Conference, p 333-338, San Diego, Ca, USA, 1992.
G T Reader Winter 2015
153
154
155
Next Steps
1. As we have seen from the power equations we will also need to know some
of the physical dimensions of the UISs, e.g., length and diameter, if we which to
calculate the power needs.
G T Reader Winter 2015
2. In the first instance these dimensions will come from the calculations of the
required strength of the hull for the particular mission. In essence if the UIS is
to operate at even modest depths we will need to consider pressure vessel
design. So we will address this issue in the next series of lectures.
3.Finally in looking at the preliminary design of vehicular UISs we will need to
consider the fundamental property of buoyancy.
156
Underwater Intervention
Systems
From Slide 15 L 7-9; + L10-12
157
158
159
160
2. A W/ ratio of 1 implies that a hull will barely support its own weight in water.
3. A ratio less than 1.0 means it will not only support itself but also other equipment which we wish
to place inside the hull.
4. Hence, the lower the W/ ratio, the more efficient the structure is for a given depth.
5. However, none of the commonly used metals such as steel, offers a positive buoyancy at pressures
found in the deepest depths.
161
162
163
(4.1)
164
(4.2)
165
(4.3)
166
167
168
169
170
Other equations have also been developed to forecast the buckling of the stiffened cylinders and
general instability. An example of how the local yield equation (4.17) and the buckling and general
instability equations can be used will also be posted to the project Resources folder in CLEW both for
information and for students selecting particular project topics.
G T Reader Winter 2015
171
172
173
1. In the next series of lectures we will look at underwater robots & drones
and complete our look at Arctic resources.
2. The Knowledge quiz on take place 12 February (64 & 38). This 1 hr
multiple choice quiz will cover materials presented in class, not including
the videos, and will be open book, i.e., you will be able to use your class
notes and the slide decks you have received. The materials to be covered
are up to and including slide 17 of Lecture 12.
ANY QUESTIONS?
174
Underwater Intervention
Systems
Lecture 13-15, Drones, Swarms and the Arctic
06-88-590-38 & 06-92-590-64 Thur 5 Feb 2015
06-88-590-28 & 06-92-590-64 Wed 11 Feb 2015
175
Recap:
1. We have studied the underwater environment and some of its oceanographic aspects
in order to grasp the challenges we face in the use and design of UISs.
2. We have explored the use and development of UISs for naval, commercial, scientific
and recreational purposes. We have also investigated the increased use of UISs for
energy generation and certain criminal activities.
3. We have seen that in order to attempt the preliminary design of vehicular types of
UISs we need methods of calculating propulsive power, buoyancy and strength ( using
thin-shell theory).
4. The vehicular UISs we have considered in detail have been mainly manned vessels
although AUVs and Gliders have been mentioned.
176
177
178
179
Comments on Terminology
1. The terms drone and more recently swarm have come into common usage to describe
unmanned systems on land, sea and air, whether used for military, scientific, commercial or
recreational purposes. Drone, referring to an individual system, and swarm, to a co-operating
cluster of drones.
2. However as we seen there are many different types of unmanned systems and using catch-all
terms such as drone and swarm, can lead to misunderstandings and must be used with care.
3. For example the US Army (Air Force) use what the popular media may call drones but they refer
to them as UASs (Unmanned Aircraft Systems). The Army also use the term swarm but to them
this means Smart Warfighting Array of Reconfigurable Modules. *
4. There are many other examples and as we have discovered there is a multitude of acronyms,
abbreviations and terms in use to describe what often is the same device.
180
181
182
183
Greek Fire:
1. The origins of attacking surface ships at a
distance appears to have been in the Greek
States. Although surface ships were built
with underwater rams nevertheless the
attacker had to get up close and personal.
The next stage was then the Greek*
flamethrower.
2. The figure on the right illustrates the
possible use of Greek-fire.
* Known by other names throughout history see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_fire
G T Reader Winter 2015
184
185
Torpedo Developments 1
1.The Islamic torpedo* cannot be described as an UIS but the concept of sinking or
damaging ships at a distance by a self-propelled device would attract more interest
after the attack by the Turtle on the British Warships during the so-called American
War for Independence.
2. The development of the torpedoes we know today came about in the 19th
century. However, even then although the torpedoes operated underwater they
could be launched from underwater vehicles, surface ships or land. Later the ability
to launch torpedoes from aircraft was developed almost as soon as military aircraft
were developed in the early 20th century.
* The term torpedo was used to describe all manner of naval weapons until the development of the
Whitehead torpedo.
G T Reader Winter 2015
186
Torpedo Developments 2
1. A number of torpedo designs were developed in the late 19th century but the first truly
effective self-propelling torpedo was designed and developed by the British engineer
Robert Whitehead when he was working at Fiume in Italy, then part of the AustroHungarian Empire, now Rijeka in Croatia.
2. The American inventor, Admiral Howell, developed a self-steering torpedo which used a
spinning flywheel to produce a bubble-free wake. The Howell torpedo was used
extensively by the US Navy for over two decades.
3. The British (Irish) mechanical engineer Louis Brennan, whilst in the then Australian
colony, invented what was the practical underwater guided missile. It was used by the
British Army in coastal defence installations.
4. Nikola Tesla, by the turn of the century, had demonstrated radio-controlled torpedoes but
no-one was interested.
G T Reader Winter 2015
187
Torpedo Developments 3
1. The Ottoman Navys submarine Abdl hamid a British built steam powered
submarine in 1888 was the first to fire a torpedo while submerged. The weapon
sank a target ship.
2. However, until the first world war torpedoes were usually launched from surface
ships.
3. In the first world war several nations used submarine launched torpedoes as well as
surface and aerial torpedoes. However, the favored submarine weapon was the
deck gun.
4. This practice continued during the second world war although the submarine
launched torpedo became increasing popular amongst the worlds navies.
5. Today the torpedo (and the guided missile) are the prime armament of the worlds
navies.
G T Reader Winter 2015
188
189
190
191
Gliders-2
1. Over the past 10-15 years underwater gliders have become increasingly sophisticated
and are now widely used by the oceanographic community.
2. Naval forces have also started to take an interest in the use of gliders and indeed have
sponsored research at a number of US and International* universities.
3. World-wide a number of university design competitions have been held involving
underwater gliders.
4. While some universities have worked on the development of existing gliders the
University of Washington (State of Washington) have developed and tested their own
gilder the SeaGlider. While not the only group involved in this glider development
their work is representative of the most advanced R&D.
* e.g., IIT Bombay (Mumbai)
G T Reader Winter 2015
192
SWARM
1. Although we have seen that there is a
military specific definition of SWARM,
the concept of a swarm of bees or ants
working together against a larger
adversary or undertaking a larger mission
impossible with one individual has been
applied to groups of small unmanned
vehicles working in the same way as
bees or ants.
2. Once again universities have become
increasingly involved in the study of
underwater swarms.
G T Reader Winter 2015
193
CoCoRo Swarms
1. CoCoRo Collective Cognitive Robots
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUk-qLfiwlc
194
Multi-vehicle operations.
1. With the advent of increasingly effective electronic sensors and controls the idea of
multi-vehicle operations is coming to fruition.
2. The Graz Swarm is a proof-of-principle lab sized demonstration. Another EU
(European Union) team involving the University of Porto (Portugal) and the University
of Rome have developed larger vehicles which they call drone submarines, but as we
shall see are small AUVs. These drones can work together in groups.
3. Although the two groups mentioned above, along with others, have demonstrated in
the laboratory and at sea, there are still a number of engineering challenges to be
addressed when trying to operate multi-vehicle groups as we shall see from the MIT
video.
195
196
197
198
199
CLIP SEQUENCE
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
200
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KqOFMVDmsw
201
202
203
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFAnaNtXOvw
204
205