Define Causal Determinism, Hard Determinism, Soft Determinism,
Indeterminism, and Libertarianism. The definition for the following words are: Causal Determinism - every event has a cause Hard Determinism - causal determinism is true, and therefore, free action and moral responsibility are impossible Soft Determinism (or compatibilism) - causal determinism is true, but we still act as free, morally responsible agents when, in the absence of external constraints, our actions are caused by our desires Indeterminism - causal determinism is false, since free, uncaused actions that we are morally responsible for are possible Libertarianism is a political philosophy that upholds liberty as its principal objective. Libertarians seek to maximize autonomy and freedom of choice, emphasizing political freedom, voluntary association and the primacy of individual judgment.
2. What is Universal Determinism? State the Thesis of Determinism. What is
fatalism? Universal Determinism is that everything is the effect of some cause or causes and for everything that exists there are antecedent conditions. The theory of Determinism is that for every event, including human action, there exist conditions that could cause no other event. Fatalism is the belief that all events are predetermined and therefore inevitable. 3. List some of the arguments used by libertarians in support of freedom of will. (Hint: the Data of Experience) Some of the arguments used by libertarians in support of freedom of will include: a. I deliberate only about MY behavior b. I deliberate only about future things c. I cannot deliberate about what I shall do, if I already know what I am going to do. d. I cannot deliberate unless I believe that it is "up to me." 4. What is John Searles Solution to the Freewill Problem? John Searles Solution to the Freewill Problem is: Reinterpreting the problem: The traditional debate conflates 2 problems: The question of the sort of freedom that is necessary for moral responsibility. The question of whether or not our actions are causally determined by their antecedents.
5. Explain the distinct philosophical views of the compatibilist and the
incompatibilist as they relate to free will and divine foreknowledge. Humans are either free or they are not. They either possess free will and can use it or they do not have it at all. They either have it and can use it as often as they want to do so or they have only the appearance of free will and really never make decisions or choices devoid of prior influences that determine the outcome of the decision or choice making procedure.