STAIMO Example Report - Training Case 1

ANALYSIS OF SPEED/POWER TRIAL DATA
ITTC 7.5 04 01 1.1 & 1.2

IMO MEPC - 65
Report No. 14325

Sea trials M.V. Bulker
Printing date: Thursday, 18 September 2014
Trial date: Wednesday, 29 May 2013
Calculation date: Thursday, 18 September 2014
Verification of calculation on www.staimo.org with verification code 6593
Report No. 14325
Sea trials M.V. Bulker
Model test report No.

Ship model No.
Propeller models No.
:
:
:
523546
4321
1234
Shipyard
Yard reference
Shipbuilding Inc.
Harbour 1
4711
Ordered by
Bulkers Inc.
Haagsteeg 2, Wageningen
Report No. 14325
CONTENTS
Page
REVIEW OF TABLES AND FIGURES .........................................................................................3
1
INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................4
PARTICULARS OF SHIP AND TRIAL..................................................................................5

2.1 Contractual trial loading condition ...............................................................................5
2.2 Contract loading condition ...........................................................................................5
2.3 EEDI loading condition ................................................................................................6
2.4 Contractual Environmental conditions ........................................................................6
2.5 EEDI Environmental conditions...................................................................................6
SPEEDTRIALS......................................................................................................................7
ANALYSIS OF SPEED TRIAL RESULTS ..........................................................................10

4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................10
4.2 True wind analysis.....................................................................................................11
4.3 Corrections summary ................................................................................................13
4.4 Ideal trial results ........................................................................................................17
CONTRACT / SERVICE CONDITION ................................................................................19

5.1 Contract/Service condition with sea margin ..............................................................23
EEDI CONDITION ...............................................................................................................28
CONCLUSIONS FOR CONTRACT ....................................................................................31
CONCLUSIONS FOR EEDI ................................................................................................32
AUTHENTICITY CHECK ....................................................................................................33
CONDITIONS OF USE OF STAIMO SOFTWARE ....................................................................34
Report No. 14325
REVIEW OF TABLES AND FIGURES

Tables
Table 1 Main particulars in contract trial condition ...................................................................... 5
Table 2 Contract specifications ................................................................................................... 5
Table 3 EEDI specifications ........................................................................................................ 6
Table 4 Contractual environmental conditions ............................................................................ 6
Table 5 EEDI environmental conditions ...................................................................................... 6
Table 6 Main particulars of the ship at trial ................................................................................. 7
Table 7 Environmental conditions during the speed trial ............................................................ 9
Table 8 Measured data................................................................................................................ 9
Table 9 True wind analysis ........................................................................................................ 11
Table 10 Intermediate derived data........................................................................................... 15
Table 11 Corrected speed trial results ...................................................................................... 16
Table 12 Ideal trial results ......................................................................................................... 17
Table 13 Tidal curve during speed trials ................................................................................... 17
Table 14 Overview of model test results ................................................................................... 19
Table 15 Model test results compared with sea trial data under same conditions ................... 19
Table 16 Ideal trial results in Laden/Design loading condition.................................................. 20
Table 17 Intermediate (calculated) values for correction to contract weather condition .......... 21
Table 18 Corrections for environmental conditions in contract loading condition .................... 22
Table 19 Trial results for contract loading condition and contract weather condition ............... 22
Table 20 Trial results for contract loading- and weather conditions with 15% sea margin ...... 23
Table 21 Overview of model test results ................................................................................... 28
Table 22 Model test results compared with sea trial data under same conditions ................... 28
Table 23 Ideal trial results in EEDI loading condition................................................................ 29
Figures
Figure 1 Sign conventions ........................................................................................................... 7
Figure 2 VTW and BTWD for all trial runs ................................................................................. 12
Figure 3 STAWIND table 14 ...................................................................................................... 13
Figure 4 Tidal curve through all trial runs .................................................................................. 18
Figure 5 Speed - power graph................................................................................................... 24
Figure 6 Speed - RPM graph .................................................................................................... 25
Figure 7 RPM - power graph ..................................................................................................... 26
Figure 8 Speed - power graph for EEDI condition .................................................................... 30
Report No. 14325
INTRODUCTION
The sea trials have been performed on board of M.V. Bulker.

The measurements were performed on 29-05-2013 in the Baltic Sea.
The average water depth was 38.0 m with an average wind speed of 8.5 m/s. The average
wave height was 1.7 m with a period of 4.7 sec. The weather conditions during the trials were
judged to be moderate, with respect to ideal weather conditions.
This report gives an overview of the measurements carried out during the speed trials. The
analysis of the measurements and the corrections to arrive at the specified contract service
conditions are described and finally, some conclusions are drawn.
Throughout this report SI units are used unless indicated otherwise. The analysis is based on
the ITTC Guidelines for Speed/Power Trials approved by IMO/MEPC65 for EEDI
determination. The software of the calculations is classified by ABS in PDA Certificate Number
14-HS1152947-PDA, date of issue 26 February 2014, indicating that the software is in
accordance with ITTC and IMO.
This report has been created with STAIMO version 1.2.0.
Report No. 14325
PARTICULARS OF SHIP AND TRIAL
M.V. Bulker with IMO number 1234567 has been built by Shipbuilding Inc.. The main
particulars and some specifications of the ship are presented in the tables below.
2.1
Contractual trial loading condition

Ship type:
Bulk carrier
Superstructure:
Normal
Loading condition:
Ballast
DESIGNATION
Length between perpendiculars
Breadth on WL
Moulded draught on FP
Moulded draught on AP
Moulded displacement volume
SYMBOL
LPP
B
TF
TA
MAGNITUDE
205.50
32.26
7.30
4.80
35477
UNIT
m
m
m
m
m3
Contract loading condition

Ship type:
Bulk carrier
Superstructure:
Unknown
Loading condition:
Laden/Design
DESIGNATION
SYMBOL
TF
TA
Transverse wind exposed area

A
Contract shaft power
PScontract
Contract propeller rotation rate
Ncontract
Contract ship speed
VScontract
Shaft power at MCR
PSMCR
Propeller rotation rate at MCR
NMCR
Shaft power at NCR
PSNCR
Propeller rotation rate at NCR
NNCR
MAGNITUDE
11.50
11.50
69822
Not relevant
8550
110.0
14.20
9500
110.0
8550
106.2
UNIT
m
m
m3
m2
kW
RPM
kts
kW
RPM
kW
RPM
Table 1 Main particulars in contract trial condition
2.2
Table 2 Contract specifications
Report No. 14325
2.3
EEDI loading condition

Ship type:
Bulk carrier
Superstructure:
Not required for analysis (no wind corrections made)
Loading condition:
EEDI displacement
DESIGNATION
SYMBOL
MAGNITUDE
TF
12.80
TA
12.80
78803
Shaft power at EEDI power

PSEEDI
7125
UNIT
m
m
m3
kW
Table 3 EEDI specifications
2.4
Contractual Environmental conditions
DESIGNATION
SYMBOL
Definition
Description
Sea margin
True wind speed
Significant wave height
Significant wave period
Air temperature
Water temperature
Air density
Water density
TAIR
TWATER
AIR
WATER
MAGNITUDE
UNIT
Ideal weather conditions
Deep water, no wind, no

waves and no current
15
0.0
0.00
0.0
15.0
15.0
1.225
1025.0
%
m/s
m
s
deg C
deg C
kg/m3
kg/m3
Table 4 Contractual environmental conditions
2.5
EEDI Environmental conditions
DESIGNATION
Definition
SYMBOL
Description
Sea margin
True wind speed
Significant wave height
Significant wave period
Air temperature
Water temperature
Air density
Water density
TAIR
TWATER
AIR
WATER
MAGNITUDE
EEDI condition
Deep water, no wind, no
waves and no current
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
15.0
15.0
1.225
1025.0
Table 5 EEDI environmental conditions
UNIT
%
m/s
m
s
deg C
deg C
kg/m3
kg/m3
Report No. 14325
SPEEDTRIALS
The measurements were performed on 29-05-2013 in the Baltic Sea.

The measurements were conducted in moderate weather conditions. The average waterdepth was 38.0 m. The water temperature was 20.0 deg C with a density of 1023.0 kg/m3.
The air temperature was 25.0 deg C with an average true wind speed of 8.5 m/s. The average
wave height was 1.7 m with a period of 4.7 sec.
During the speed trials the vessel had the following main particulars.
DESIGNATION
SYMBOL
MAGNITUDE
LPP
205.50
Breadth on WL
B
32.26
TF
4.73
TA
7.28
35040
Midship section area

AM
190.0
Wetted appendage area
SApp
108
Wetted bare hull area (including skeg
SS
8318
and rudder(s), if any)
Projected transverse wind area
A
925
Height of anemometer above sea level
HAnom
42.5
Shaft efficiency
S
0.99
UNIT
m
m
m
m
m3
m2
m2
m2
m2
m
-
Table 6 Main particulars of the ship at trial
For all runs an average time/length between start and finish for each trial run of 10 min was
used.
During each individual run, the environmental conditions were recorded (see Table 7).
Figure 1 Sign conventions
Report No. 14325

General:
________ Air _________
____ Water ____
RUN
RUNTIME POWERSETTING
Temp.
Dens.
Pres.
Temp.
Dens.
[-]
[hh:mm]
[-]
[deg C] [kg/m^3] [mbar]
[deg C] [kg/m^3]
____________________________________________________________________________
1
06:21
50% with
25.0
1.182
1012
20.0
1023.0
2
06:57
50% against
25.0
1.182
1012
20.0
1023.0
3
07:54
75% with
25.0
1.182
1012
20.0
1023.0
4
09:06
75% against
25.0
1.182
1012
20.0
1023.0
5
10:21
75% with
25.0
1.182
1012
20.0
1023.0
6
11:06
75% against
25.0
1.182
1012
20.0
1023.0
7
12:16
85% with
25.0
1.182
1012
20.0
1023.0
8
12:53
85% against
25.0
1.182
1012
20.0
1023.0
9
13:35
85% with
25.0
1.182
1012
20.0
1023.0
10
14:18
85% against
25.0
1.182
1012
20.0
1023.0
11
15:05
100% with
25.0
1.182
1012
20.0
1023.0
12
15:49 100% against
25.0
1.182
1012
20.0
1023.0
Wind:
RUN
HEAD
VS
WD
BAWD
VAW
[-] [deg]
[kts]
[m]
[deg]
[m/s]
____________________________________________
1 170.0
14.01
38
12.5
16.9
2 350.0
13.64
38
237.9
3.2
3 170.0
15.42
38
15.5
16.5
4 350.0
15.31
38
230.2
4.5
5 170.0
15.35
38
14.7
17.2
6 350.0
15.50
38
212.6
4.6
7 170.0
15.78
38
17.5
18.3
8 350.0
16.46
38
265.0
5.1
9 170.0
15.49
38
9.7
19.0
10 350.0
16.70
38
258.2
4.4
11 170.0
15.89
38
13.6
18.8
12 350.0
17.18
38
247.1
3.9
Waves:
RUN
HEAD
VS
HW13 TWV MUWAVD
HS13
TSV MUSWELD
[-] [deg]
[kts]
[m] [s] [deg]
[m]
[s]
[deg]
_________________________________________________________________
1 170.0
14.01
1.5 4.0
0
0.0
0.0
0
2 350.0
13.64
1.5 4.0
180
0.0
0.0
0
3 170.0
15.42
1.5 4.0
0
0.0
0.0
0
4 350.0
15.31
1.5 4.0
180
0.0
0.0
0
5 170.0
15.35
1.7 5.0
0
0.0
0.0
0
6 350.0
15.50
1.7 5.0
180
0.0
0.0
0
7 170.0
15.78
1.8 5.0
0
0.0
0.0
0
8 350.0
16.46
1.8 5.0
180
0.0
0.0
0
9 170.0
15.49
1.8 5.0
0
0.0
0.0
0
10 350.0
16.70
1.8 5.0
180
0.0
0.0
0
11 170.0
15.89
1.8 5.0
0
0.0
0.0
0
12 350.0
17.18
1.8 5.0
180
0.0
0.0
0
RUN
RUNTIME
POWERSETTING
RUNDATE
Air Temp.
Air Dens.
Air Pres.
Water Temp.
Water Dens.
HEAD
VS
WD
BAWD
VAW
HW13
TWV
MUWAVD
HS13
Trial run number

Start time of trial run
Comments for a run
Trial run date
Air temperature
Air density
Air pressure
Water temperature
Water density
Heading
Ship speed over ground
Water depth
Measured relative wind direction at anemometer height
Measured relative wind speed at anemometer height
Significant wave height (wind waves)
Wave period (wind waves)
Relative wave direction (wind waves)
Significant swell height (swell waves)
Report No. 14325

TSV
MUSWELD
Swell period (swell waves)

Relative swell direction (Swell waves)
Table 7 Environmental conditions during the speed trial
An overview of the measured speed, shaft power and propeller RPM during the speed trial
runs can be found in Table 8.
The speed trials were conducted in moderate weather conditions.
Anemometer height
[m]:
Measurement time/duration :
Moulded draught on FP [m]:
Moulded draught on AP [m]:
Moulded displacement [m^3]:
Shaft outer diameter [mm]:
Shaft inner diameter [mm]:
Shear modulus
[N/mm^2]:
42.5
10 min
4.73
7.28
35040
700
0
82649
RUN RUNSET POWERSETTING

VS
PS
RPM
[-]
[-]
[-]
[kts]
[kW]
[rpm]
_________________________________________________
1
1
50% with
14.01
5010
85.8
2
1
50% against
13.64
4958
85.8
3
2
75% with
15.42
7704
97.6
4
2
75% against
15.31
7571
97.6
5
2
75% with
15.35
7723
97.6
6
2
75% against
15.50
7354
97.6
7
3
85% with
15.78
9224
103.0
8
3
85% against
16.46
9049
103.0
9
3
85% with
15.49
9175
103.0
10
3
85% against
16.70
9083
103.0
11
4
100% with
15.89
10352
107.2
12
4 100% against
17.18
10119
107.2
RUN
RUNSET
POWERSETTING
VS
PS
RPM
Trial run number

ID number for runs in same set
Comments for a run
Shaft power
Propeller rotation rate
Table 8 Measured data
Report No. 14325
10
ANALYSIS OF SPEED TRIAL RESULTS
4.1 Introduction
The analysis is performed in five steps:
1. Correct the measured speed/power data towards ideal trial weather conditions.
2. Conversion from the trial loading condition towards the trial condition according to the
contract.
3. Conversion from the ideal trial condition towards the contract loading/weather
condition.
4. Conversion with the specified sea margin towards the agreed service condition.
5. Conversion from the ideal trial condition towards the EEDI loading condition.
In order to determine the performance under ideal weather conditions, corrections have been
applied to each individual run. To correct the individual results for their relative wind, first for
each set of runs the correct true wind speed and direction is determined. After the individual
corrections are made, the weighted true wind average for each set of runs is taken according
to Pascal's Triangle. Based on this weighted true wind average, the runs relative wind vector
is calculated.
Measurements with a too low engine power setting are not taken into account for the ideal trial
curve.
The effect of current is eliminated by averaging the measured speeds with the means of
means method.
To come from ideal trial loading/weather condition to the EEDI condition, the speed power test
results are converted to the EEDI condition on the basis of model test results with no wind, no
waves etc. for trial loading condition and EEDI loading condition.
To determine the achieved speed and RPM values at contract service conditions, the service
power and RPM curve are intersected with the contract power of 8550 kW, MCR power of
9500 kW and NCR power of 8550 kW on the basis of a least square approximations.
To determine the achieved speed and RPM values at EEDI conditions, the power and RPM
curve are intersected with the EEDI power of 7125 kW, on the basis of least square
approximations.
Detailed descriptions concerning the theory behind all corrections are given in ITTC
Guidelines 2012.
Report No. 14325
11
4.2 True wind analysis

To determine the true wind speed and direction, for each set of trial runs the speed vector is
averaged.
Height of anemometer:
42.5
Height of reference anemometer: 10.0
Height correction fac.:
0.81
[m]
[m]
[-]
Averaged wind speed and direction values:

----------------------------------------WINDSET VTWX_average VTWY_average VTW_average BTWD_average
[-]
[m/s]
[m/s]
[m/s]
[deg]
_____________________________________________________________
1
1.57
9.43
9.56
189.4
2
2.24
9.90
10.15
192.8
3
1.58
10.71
10.83
188.4
4
3.62
9.91
10.55
200.1
5
1.95
10.62
10.80
190.4
6
2.17
10.76
10.98
191.4
Final corrected wind speed and direction values:

-----------------------------------------------RUN
RUNSET
WINDSET
VS
VAW
BAWD
VTW
BTWD
VTWC
BTWCD
VAWC
BAWCD
[-]
[-]
[-] [kts] [m/s]
[deg] [m/s]
[deg] [m/s]
[deg] [m/s]
[deg]
___________________________________________________________________________________________
1
1
1 14.01 16.93
12.5 10.01
191.5
7.77
189.4 14.77
10.1
2
1
1 13.64
3.19
237.9
9.12
187.2
7.77
189.4
2.61
263.1
3
2
2 15.42 16.51
15.5
9.12
198.9
8.26
192.8 15.87
11.6
4
2
2 15.31
4.48
230.2 11.28
187.8
8.26
192.8
3.20
274.7
5
2
3 15.35 17.18
14.7
9.75
196.6
8.81
188.4 16.49
9.7
6
2
3 15.50
4.58
212.6 12.09
181.8
8.81
188.4
2.80
262.1
7
3
4 15.78 18.31
17.5 10.85
200.5
8.58
200.1 16.13
15.5
8
3
4 16.46
5.09
265.0 10.25
199.7
8.58
200.1
4.43
283.6
9
3
5 15.49 18.98
9.7 11.21
186.6
8.78
190.4 16.49
10.7
10
3
5 16.70
4.42
258.2 10.44
194.5
8.78
190.4
3.08
276.7
11
4
6 15.89 18.78
13.6 11.00
193.7
8.93
191.4 16.80
11.2
12
4
6 17.18
3.91
247.1 10.97
189.2
8.93
191.4
3.30
279.2
RUN
RUNSET
WINDSET
VS
VAW
BAWD
VTW
BTWD
VTW_average
BTWD_average
VTWC
BTWCD
VAWC
BAWCD
Trial run number

Double run ID for runs in same set
ID number for identical wind conditions
Measured relative wind speed at anemometer height
Measured relative wind direction at anemometer height
Calculated true wind speed at anemometer height
Calculated true wind direction at anemometer height
Calculated average true wind speed at anemometer height
Calculated average true wind direction at anemometer height
Corrected average true wind speed at reference height
Corrected average true wind direction at reference height
Corrected relative wind speed at reference height
Corrected relative wind direction at reference height
Table 9 True wind analysis
Report No. 14325
Figure 2 VTW and BTWD for all trial runs
12
Report No. 14325
13
4.3 Corrections summary

In order to compare the speed trial results with the contract specifications, corrections must be
applied for the weather conditions during the trials.
The measurements are corrected using the following methods:
Ship type:
Bulk carrier
Superstructure:
Normal
Loading condition:
Ballast
Power corrections:
Temperature method: ITTC conventions
Density method:
ITTC conventions
Displacement method: Admiralty coefficient.
The difference between the contract trial displacement and
actual trial displacement is within the limit of 2% displacement.
The displacement used for the calculations is 35040 m^3.
Wind method:
STAWIND method (pre-selected cx values)
Wind table: STAWIND table 14.
Figure 3 STAWIND table 14
Report No. 14325

Wave method :
Swell method:
Spectrum:
Propeller load:
14
STAWAVE1 method (no ship motion due to waves)

STAWAVE1 method (no ship motion due to waves)
No spectrum used
Overload factors as derived from model tests
8.00% ETAD decrease per 100% load increase
Speed corrections:
Water depth method: Lackenby
RPM corrections:
RPM method:
Overload as derived from model tests (based on RPM/power

and RPM/speed)
20.00% RPM increase per 100% power increase
33.00% RPM increase per 100% speed increase Overload as
derived from model tests (based on RPM/power and
RPM/speed)
The corrections are performed according the procedure described in ITTC Guidelines 2012.
All parameters for corrections are treated separately.
Report No. 14325
15
The following intermediate (calculated) values were used:

Gravitational acceleration:
Kinematic viscosity for water on trial:
Air density on trial:
Transverse wind exposed area
9.8067
1.051E-06
1.182
925
[m/s^2]
[m/s^2]
[kg/m^3]
[m^2]
RUN
RUNSET
ReWATER
Cfa
CX
VAWC
RWIND
VAWREF
CXI
RWINDI
[-]
[-]
[-]
[-]
[-]
[m/s]
[kN]
[m/s]
[-]
[-]
______________________________________________________________________________________________
1
1 1.391E+09 1.470E-03
-0.649
14.77
-77.3
7.21
-0.740
-21.0
2
1 1.391E+09 1.470E-03
0.149
2.61
0.6
7.02
-0.740
-19.9
3
2 1.546E+09 1.451E-03
-0.630
15.87
-86.7
7.93
-0.740
-25.5
4
2 1.546E+09 1.451E-03
0.072
3.20
0.4
7.88
-0.740
-25.1
5
2 1.546E+09 1.451E-03
-0.655
16.49
-97.4
7.90
-0.740
-25.2
6
2 1.546E+09 1.451E-03
0.167
2.80
0.7
7.97
-0.740
-25.7
7
3 1.614E+09 1.444E-03
-0.608
16.13
-86.5
8.12
-0.740
-26.7
8
3 1.614E+09 1.444E-03
0.008
4.43
0.1
8.47
-0.740
-29.0
9
3 1.614E+09 1.444E-03
-0.640
16.49
-95.1
7.97
-0.740
-25.7
10
3 1.614E+09 1.444E-03
0.056
3.08
0.3
8.59
-0.740
-29.9
11
4 1.664E+09 1.438E-03
-0.634
16.80
-97.9
8.17
-0.740
-27.0
12
4 1.664E+09 1.438E-03
0.036
3.30
0.2
8.84
-0.740
-31.6
RUN
RUNSET
ETAD
[-]
[-]
[-]
________________________
1
1
0.721
2
1
0.721
3
2
0.714
4
2
0.714
5
2
0.714
6
2
0.714
7
3
0.710
8
3
0.710
9
3
0.710
10
3
0.710
11
4
0.705
12
4
0.705
RUN
RUNSET
ReWATER
Cfa
CX
VAWC
RWIND
VAWREF
CXI
RWINDI
ETAD
Trial run number

Double run ID for runs in same set
Reynolds number for trial run
Frictional coefficient for trial run
Wind resistance coefficient for trial run
Averaged and corrected apparent wind speed
Wind resistance for trial run
Apparent wind speed for ideal trial run
Wind resistance coefficient for ideal trial run
Wind resistance for ideal trial run
Propulsive efficiency for trial run
Table 10 Intermediate derived data
Report No. 14325
16
This has resulted in the following individual corrections and averaged values for M.V. Bulker:
|_______ measurements _______| |____________________ corrections__________________| |_______ corrected ______|
RUN VSM
PSM
PDM
NM
DVS
TEMP DENS DISP
WIND
WAVES
LOAD
dN
VSC
PDC
PSC
NC
[-] [kts]
[kW]
[kW] [RPM] [kts]
[kW] [kW] [kW]
[kW]
[kW]
[kW] [RPM] [kts]
[kW]
[kW] [RPM]
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Run set:
1
1 14.01
5010
4960 85.8 0.14
47.4
9.8 41.2 -555.6 -531.8 -101.4 -4.3 14.15
3869
3909
81.5
2 13.64
4958
4908 85.8 0.14
47.4
9.7 40.8
202.1
0.0
22.5 1.4 13.78
5231
5284
87.2
-------------------------Set averages ideal trial:
13.97
4550
4596
84.3
Note: Power setting too low, this averaged set is disregarded for the speed power curve.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Run set:
2
3 15.42
7704
7627 97.6 0.16
64.4 15.1 63.4 -678.0 -596.5 -108.1 -3.3 15.58
6387
6452
94.3
4 15.31
7571
7495 97.6 0.16
64.4 14.8 62.3
282.3
0.0
32.0 1.5 15.47
7951
8031
99.1
5 15.35
7723
7646 97.6 0.16
64.4 15.1 63.6 -798.8 -766.1 -143.0 -4.5 15.51
6081
6142
93.1
6 15.50
7354
7280 97.6 0.16
64.4 14.4 60.5
292.7
0.0
32.5 1.5 15.66
7745
7823
99.1
15.52
7029
7100
96.2
Note: No remarks on power settings.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Run set:
3
7 15.78
9224
9132 103.0 0.16
73.3 18.0 75.9 -696.2 -902.6 -138.3 -3.8 15.94
7562
7638
99.2
8 16.46
9049
8959 103.0 0.17
73.3 17.7 74.5
338.5
0.0
38.0 1.6 16.63
9500
9596 104.6
9 15.49
9175
9083 103.0 0.16
73.3 17.9 75.5 -807.1 -902.6 -151.8 -4.2 15.65
7388
7463
98.8
10 16.70
9083
8992 103.0 0.17
73.3 17.8 74.7
350.7
0.0
38.9 1.6 16.87
9548
9644 104.6
16.20
8472
8558 101.7
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Run set:
4
11 15.89 10352 10248 107.2 0.16
80.4 20.2 85.2 -855.6 -937.0 -155.2 -4.0 16.05
8486
8572 103.2
12 17.18 10119 10018 107.2 0.18
80.4 19.8 83.3
384.2
0.0
42.8 1.6 17.36 10628 10736 108.8
16.70
9557
9654 106.0
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
General remarks:
- None
RUN
VSM
PSM
PDM
NM
DVS
TEMP
DENS
DISP
WIND
WAVES
LOAD
dN
VSC
PDC
PSC
NC
Trial run number

Measured ship speed (over ground)
Total measured shaft power
Total measured delivered power (PSM*ETAS)
Measured propeller rotation rate
Shallow water speed correction
Delivered power correction for difference
Delivered power correction for resistance
Delivered power correction for resistance
Delivered power correction for efficiency
RPM correction
Corrected ship speed
Corrected delivered power
Corrected shaft power (PDC/ETAS)
Corrected propeller rotation rate
in temperature
in density
in displacement
caused by wind
due to waves (wind and swell waves)
effects of changed propeller loading
Table 11 Corrected speed trial results
Report No. 14325
17
4.4 Ideal trial results

Taking into account the corrections as described in paragraph 4.3, the following ideal trial
points are determined:
VS
PS
N
ETAD
VOL
[kts]
[kW]
[RPM]
[-]
[m^3]
_________________________________________
15.52
7100
96.2
0.714
35040
16.20
8558
101.7
0.710
35040
16.70
9654
106.0
0.705
35040
VS
PS
N
ETAD
VOL
Ship speed (Ideal trial)

Shaft power (Ideal trial)
Propeller rotation rate (Ideal trial)
Propulsive efficiency
Table 12 Ideal trial results
The ideal trial weather condition is defined as: no wind, no waves, deep water, water
temperature of 15 deg C., air temperature of 15 deg C., water density of 1025 kg/m3, air
density of 1.225 kg/m3.
The tidal curve resulting from the analysis is presented in the following table and graph:
RUN
RUNTIME
RUNTYPE
VSM VSM_average
VCX
[-]
[hh:mm]
[-]
[kts]
[kts]
[kts]
_____________________________________________________________
1
06:21
Forward run
14.01
13.83
0.33
2
06:57
Return run
13.64
13.83
0.05
3
07:54
Forward run
15.42
15.36
0.21
4
09:06
Return run
15.31
15.36
-0.10
5
10:21
Forward run
15.35
15.36
0.14
6
11:06
Return run
15.50
15.36
-0.29
7
12:16
Forward run
15.78
16.04
-0.10
8
12:53
Return run
16.46
16.04
-0.59
9
13:35
Forward run
15.49
16.04
-0.39
10
14:18
Return run
16.70
16.04
-0.83
11
15:05
Forward run
15.89
16.54
-0.48
12
15:49
Return run
17.18
16.54
-0.82
RUN
RUNTIME
RUNTYPE
VSM
VSM_average
VCX
Trial run number

Start time of run
Run direction Forward or Return
Average ship speed over ground for run set
Current velocity from based on mean of RUNSET
Table 13 Tidal curve during speed trials
Report No. 14325
Figure 4 Tidal curve through all trial runs
18
Report No. 14325
19
CONTRACT / SERVICE CONDITION
For further analysis towards contract/service conditions, model test data is used to correct the
data to Laden/Design condition.
The following model test results are used:
LOADCONDITION
VOL
T_APP
T_FPP
VS
PS
N
ETAD
[-]
[m^3]
[m]
[m] [kts]
[kW]
[rpm]
[-]
__________________________________________________________________________________
Contract trial condition
35477
4.80
7.30 11.00
2313
66.3
0.726
35477
4.80
7.30 12.00
3035
72.6
0.727
35477
4.80
7.30 13.00
4018
79.6
0.725
35477
4.80
7.30 14.00
5225
86.8
0.720
35477
4.80
7.30 15.00
6728
94.3
0.716
35477
4.80
7.30 16.00
8716
102.5
0.710
35477
4.80
7.30 16.50
9987
107.1
0.705
35477
4.80
7.30 17.00
11503
112.3
0.700
Contract
Contract
Contract
Contract
Contract
Contract
Contract
condition
condition
condition
condition
condition
condition
condition
69822
69822
69822
69822
69822
69822
69822
11.50
11.50
11.50
11.50
11.50
11.50
11.50
11.50
11.50
11.50
11.50
11.50
11.50
11.50
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
14.50
15.00
16.00
3084
4068
5169
6527
7404
8451
10992
73.4
80.4
87.3
94.5
98.4
102.6
111.5
0.700
0.694
0.700
0.700
0.696
0.691
0.690
Powering data based on model test results.

LOADCONDITION
TESTTYPE
VOL
T_APP
T_FPP
VS
PS
N
ETAD
Specified loading condition

Type of performance prediction
Moulded draught at aft perpendicular
Moulded draught at forward perpendicular
Predicted ship speed
Predicted shaft power
Predicted propeller rotation rate
Predicted propulsive efficiency
Table 14 Overview of model test results
The ideal trial points are compared with the model test results in identical weather conditions.
This results in correction factors on shaft power and propeller rotation rate. The weighted
average of these factors will be used as factors on the model test results to calculate the ideal
trial curve in the contract loading condition:
VS
Pm
Nm
Pt
Nt
RUNSUM facPS facN
[kts]
[kW]
[RPM]
[kW]
[-]
[-]
[-]
[-]
__________________________________________________________________
15.52
7681
98.4
7100
96.2
4 0.924 0.978
16.20
9210
104.3
8558
101.7
4 0.929 0.975
16.70
10574
109.1
9654
106.0
2 0.913 0.972
----------Weighted average: 0.924 0.975
This means that based on the speed trials, the vessel performs 7.6% better than expected
according to the model test results.
VS
Pm
Nm
Pt
Nt
RUNSUM
facPS
facN
Ship speed
Shaft power from model test results (ideal weather condition)
Propeller rotation rate from model test results (ideal weather condition)
Shaft power from speed trial (ideal weather condition)
Propeller rotation rate from speed trial (ideal weather condition)
Number of runs per averaged speed point
Shaft power correction factor on model test results
Propeller rotation rate correction factor on model test results
Table 15 Model test results compared with sea trial data under same conditions
Report No. 14325
20
Performance in ideal contract loading condition based on speed/power tests:

VS
Pm
Nm
facPS facN
Ps
Ns
ETAD
[kts]
[kW]
[RPM]
[-]
[-]
[kW]
[RPM]
[-]
_____________________________________________________________________
11.00
3084
73.4
0.924 0.975
2850
71.6 0.700
12.00
4068
80.4
0.924 0.975
3759
78.4 0.694
13.00
5169
87.3
0.924 0.975
4776
85.2 0.700
14.00
6527
94.5
0.924 0.975
6031
92.2 0.700
14.50
7404
98.4
0.924 0.975
6841
96.0 0.696
15.00
8451
102.6
0.924 0.975
7809
100.1 0.691
16.00
10992
111.5
0.924 0.975
10156
108.8 0.690
VS
Pm
Nm
facPS
facN
Ps
Ns
ETAD
Ship speed
Shaft power from model test results (ideal weather condition, contract loading
condition)
Propeller rotation rate from model test results (ideal weather condition,
contract loading condition)
Ship shaft power in contract loading condition, ideal weather condition
Ship propeller rotation rate in contract loading condition, ideal weather
condition
Table 16 Ideal trial results in Laden/Design loading condition
Report No. 14325
21
Contract/Service condition without sea margin

The contract environmental conditions were described as Deep water, no wind, no waves and
no current. The following corrections were made:
Ship type:
Bulk carrier
Superstructure:
Unknown
Loading condition:
Laden
Power corrections for contractual environmental conditions:
No corrections for wind taken into account.
No corrections for waves were taken into account.
Wind method:
None
Wave method :
Spectrum:
None
No spectrum used.
The following intermediate (calculated) values were used:

Contractual agreed meteorological conditions during sea trials: Ideal weather conditions
True wind speed in contract trial condition:
0.0
[m/s]
0.00
[kts]
Wind resistance coefficient in contract condition:
0.00
[-]
Air density in contract trial condition:
1.225 [kg/m^3]
Significant wave height in contract weather condition:
Significant wave period in contract weather condition:
0.00
0.0
[m]
[s]
VS
VS
VAW_c
RWIND
VAW_i RWIND_i ETAD
ETAS
[kts] [m/s]
[m/s]
[kN]
[m/s]
[kN] [-]
[-]
__________________________________________________________
11.0
5.659
5.659
0.0
5.659
0.0 0.700 0.990
12.0
6.173
6.173
0.0
6.173
0.0 0.694 0.990
13.0
6.688
6.688
0.0
6.688
0.0 0.700 0.990
14.0
7.202
7.202
0.0
7.202
0.0 0.700 0.990
14.5
7.459
7.459
0.0
7.459
0.0 0.696 0.990
15.0
7.717
7.717
0.0
7.717
0.0 0.691 0.990
16.0
8.231
8.231
0.0
8.231
0.0 0.690 0.990
VS
VAW_c
RWIND
VAW_i
RWIND_i
ETAD
ETAS
Ship speed
Relative wind speed in contract weather condition
Resistance corresponding with the relative wind speed in contract weather
condition
Relative wind speed in ideal weather condition (no wind, no waves)
Resistance corresponding with the relative wind speed in ideal weather condition
Propulsive efficiency (from model test)
Shaft efficiency
Table 17 Intermediate (calculated) values for correction to contract weather condition
Report No. 14325
22
Environmental corrections for contract loading condition:

VS
PDWIND
PDWAVE
PDLOAD
CPD
CPS
CNS
[kts]
[kW]
[kW]
[kW]
[kW]
[RPM]
[RPM]
____________________________________________________________
11.00
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
12.00
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
13.00
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
14.00
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
14.50
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
15.00
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
16.00
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
Remarks:
- None
VS
PDWIND
PDWAVE
PDLOAD
CPD
CPS
CNS
Ship speed
Delivered power correction for wind
Delivered power correction for waves
Delivered power correction for efficiency effects of changed propeller loading
Total correction on delivered power
Total correction on shaft power
Total correction on propeller rotation rate
Table 18 Corrections for environmental conditions in contract loading condition
Resulting speed/power trial data in contract loading condition:

VS
PS
NS
CPS
CNS
PSC
NSC
[kts]
[kW]
[RPM]
[kW]
[RPM]
[kW]
[RPM]
____________________________________________________________
11.00
2850
71.6
0
0.0
2850
71.6
12.00
3759
78.4
0
0.0
3759
78.4
13.00
4776
85.2
0
0.0
4776
85.2
14.00
6031
92.2
0
0.0
6031
92.2
14.50
6841
96.0
0
0.0
6841
96.0
15.00
7809
100.1
0
0.0
7809
100.1
16.00
10156
108.8
0
0.0
10156
108.8
VS
PS
NS
CPS
CNS
PSC
NSC
Ship speed
Ship shaft power in contract loading condition, ideal weather condition
Ship propeller rotation rate in contract loading condition, ideal weather
condition
Total correction on shaft power
Total correction on propeller rotation rate
Ship shaft power in contract loading condition and contract weather condition
Ship propeller rotation rate in contract loading condition and contract weather
condition
Table 19 Trial results for contract loading condition and contract weather condition
Report No. 14325
5.1
23
Contract/Service condition with sea margin
Resulting service data with 15% sea margin:

VS
Ps
Ns
DP
DN
P
N
[kts]
[kW]
[RPM]
[kW]
[RPM]
[kW]
[RPM]
________________________________________________________________
11.00
2850
71.6
427.4
2.1
3277
73.7
12.00
3759
78.4
563.8
2.4
4323
80.8
13.00
4776
85.2
716.4
2.6
5492
87.7
14.00
6031
92.2
904.6
2.8
6935
94.9
14.50
6841
96.0
1026.2
2.9
7867
98.9
15.00
7809
100.1
1171.3
3.0
8980
103.1
16.00
10156
108.8
1523.5
3.3
11680
112.0
Vs
Ps
Ns
DP
DN
P
N
Ship speed
Ship shaft power in contract loading condition and contract weather condition
Ship propeller rotation rate in contract loading condition and contract weather
condition
Shaft power correction for sea margin
Correction for ship propeller rotation rate as result of sea margin
Ship shaft power in contractual service conditions
Ship propeller rotation rate in contractual service conditions
Table 20 Trial results for contract loading- and weather conditions with 15% sea margin
Report No. 14325
Figure 5 Speed - power graph
24
Report No. 14325
Figure 6 Speed - RPM graph
25
Report No. 14325
Figure 7 RPM - power graph
26
Report No. 14325
27
The contract service curve is intersected with the contract power of 8550 [kW]. A double
quadratic interpolation procedure through the points is used to determine a service speed of
14.82 kts at 101.5 RPM with 15% sea margin at a Laden/Design contract loading condition, a
true wind speed of 0.0 m/s, a significant wave height of 0.00 m and a significant wave period
of 0.0 s.
At a MCR power of 9500 kW a speed is found of 15.21 kts at 104.9 RPM.
At a NCR power of 8550 kW a speed is found of 14.82 kts at 101.5 RPM.
The rotation rate at NCR without sea margin is 103.0 and the contract rotation rate at NCR
was 106.2 RPM.
Therefore the light running margin is -3.00%.
Report No. 14325
28
EEDI CONDITION
For further analysis towards the EEDI condition, model test data is used to correct towards the
EEDI loading condition. The verifier present during the sea trials was M. Verifier from Verfying
Inc..
The following model test results are used:
LOADCONDITION
VOL
T_APP
T_FPP
VS
PS
N
ETAD
[-]
[m^3]
[m]
[m] [kts]
[kW]
[rpm]
[-]
__________________________________________________________________________________
35477
4.80
7.30 11.00
2313
66.3
0.726
35477
4.80
7.30 12.00
3035
72.6
0.727
35477
4.80
7.30 13.00
4018
79.6
0.725
35477
4.80
7.30 14.00
5225
86.8
0.720
35477
4.80
7.30 15.00
6728
94.3
0.716
35477
4.80
7.30 16.00
8716
102.5
0.710
35477
4.80
7.30 16.50
9987
107.1
0.705
35477
4.80
7.30 17.00
11503
112.3
0.700
EEDI
EEDI
EEDI
EEDI
EEDI
EEDI
EEDI
condition
condition
condition
condition
condition
condition
condition
78803
78803
78803
78803
78803
78803
78803
12.80
12.80
12.80
12.80
12.80
12.80
12.80
12.80
12.80
12.80
12.80
12.80
12.80
12.80
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
14.50
15.00
16.00
3259
4299
5462
6898
7824
8931
11616
74.9
82.0
89.1
96.4
100.4
104.7
113.7
0.683
0.677
0.683
0.683
0.679
0.674
0.673
Powering data based on model test results with no wind, no waves etc.
LOADCONDITION
VOL
T_APP
T_FPP
VS
PS
N
ETAD
Specified loading condition

Moulded draught at aft perpendicular
Moulded draught at fore perpendicular
Predicted ship speed
Predicted shaft power
Predicted propeller rotation rate
Table 21 Overview of model test results
The ideal trial points are compared with the model test results in identical weather conditions.
This results in correction factors on shaft power and propeller rotation rate. The weighted
average of these factors will be used as factors on the model test results to calculate the
performance in the EEDI loading condition:
VS
Pm
Nm
Pt
Nt
RUNSUM facPS facN
[kts]
[kW]
[RPM]
[kW]
[-]
[-]
[-]
[-]
__________________________________________________________________
15.52
7681
98.4
7100
96.2
4 0.924 0.978
16.20
9210
104.3
8558
101.7
4 0.929 0.975
16.70
10574
109.1
9654
106.0
2 0.913 0.972
----------Weighted average: 0.924 0.975
This means that based on the speed trials, the vessel performs 7.6% better than expected
according to the model test results.
VS
Pm
Nm
Pt
Nt
RUNSUM
facPS
facN
Ship speed during sea trials

Shaft power from model test results (ideal weather condition)
Propeller rotation rate from model test results (ideal weather condition)
Shaft power from sea trial corrected for ideal weather conditions
Propeller rotation rate from sea trials corrected for ideal weather condition
Number of runs per averaged trial point
Table 22 Model test results compared with sea trial data under same conditions
Report No. 14325

Performance in EEDI loading condition (ideal weather condition):
VS
Pm
Nm
facPS facN
Ps
Ns
ETAD
[kts]
[kW]
[RPM]
[-]
[-]
[kW]
[RPM]
[-]
_____________________________________________________________________
11.00
3259
74.9
0.924 0.975
3011
73.1 0.683
12.00
4299
82.0
0.924 0.975
3972
80.0 0.677
13.00
5462
89.1
0.924 0.975
5047
86.9 0.683
14.00
6898
96.4
0.924 0.975
6374
94.0 0.683
14.50
7824
100.4
0.924 0.975
7229
97.9 0.679
15.00
8931
104.7
0.924 0.975
8252
102.1 0.674
16.00
11616
113.7
0.924 0.975
10733
110.9 0.673
VS
Pm
Nm
facPS
facN
Ps
Ns
ETAD
Ship speed
Shaft power from model test results (ideal weather condition,
EEDI loading condition)
Propeller rotation rate from model test results
(ideal weather condition, EEDI loading condition)
Ship shaft power in EEDI loading condition, ideal weather condition
Ship propeller rotation rate in EEDI loading condition,
ideal weather condition
Table 23 Ideal trial results in EEDI loading condition
29
Report No. 14325
Figure 8 Speed - power graph for EEDI condition
30
Report No. 14325
31
CONCLUSIONS FOR CONTRACT
Based on the speed trial the following conclusions can be drawn:
The speed trials were performed in moderate weather.

A service curve is determined on the basis of the speed trials:
- Corrected for deviations from ideal trial weather conditions;
- Convert to the correct Laden/Design contract loading condition;
- Taking into account the environmental conditions of a true wind speed of 0.0 m/s, a
significant wave height of 0.00 m and a significant wave period of 0.0 s.
- Using a sea margin of 15%
The theoretical background for all corrections is described in ITTC Guidelines 2012.
The achieved speed at the agreed contractual service condition using the service curve is
14.82 kts at 8550 kW and 101.5 RPM.
Speed at MCR using the service curve is 15.21 kts at 9500 kW and 104.9 RPM.
Speed at NCR using the service curve is 14.82 kts at 8550 kW and 101.5 RPM.
The light running margin is -3.00% (the propeller is heavy running).
Report No. 14325
32
CONCLUSIONS FOR EEDI
Based on the speed trial the following conclusions can be drawn:
The speed trials were performed in moderate weather.

An EEDI curve is determined on the basis of the speed trials:
- Corrected for deviations from ideal trial weather conditions;
- Convert to the EEDI loading condition;
- Taking into account the environmental conditions of a true wind speed of 0.0 m/s, a
significant wave height of 0.0 m and a significant wave period of 0.0 s.
- Using a sea margin of 0%
The theoretical background for all corrections is described in ITTC Guidelines 2012 .
The verified speed at the EEDI condition using the EEDI curve is
14.44 kts at 7125 kW and 97.49 RPM

Shiptype: Bulk carrier
Displacement: 78803 m3
Main engine power: 9500 kW
Report No. 14325
33
AUTHENTICITY CHECK
In order to verify that:

the proper software version is used and
the software used is indeed the certified software according to the IMO/ITTC approved
method,
it is possible to verify this calculation by means of a verification code.
The verification code for this calculation is
6593
For verification go to www.staimo.org and fill-in the following data:

STAIMO version number
Ships IMO number
Speed at EEDI condition
1.2.0
1234567
14.44
205.50
The computer program behind the website will inform you whether the correct version of the
software is used and whether the analysis is done according the IMO-ITTC method or with a
computer program / analysis method from an undefined source.
Report No. 14325
34
CONDITIONS OF USE OF STAIMO SOFTWARE

1.
STAIMO is developed on behalf of STA-Group. All rights on the software vest

in STA-Group. It has been made available by STA-Group as Freeware on
www.staimo.org. The person that downloads the Software from the site is
referred to as User.
2.
User shall not transfer or sub license STAIMO or any part thereof to any third
party. The User shall take appropriate measures to ensure the observation of
this clause within his organisation.
3.
STAIMO, including any Service, Support and consultancy, is provided "AS

IS", without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including but not limited
to the warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and noninfringement. In no event shall the authors or copyright holders be liable for
any claim, damages or other liability, whether in an action of contract, tort or
otherwise, arising from, out or in connection with the software or the use or
other dealings in the software.
4.
STA-Group is entitled to withdraw STAIMO from the web site and to cancel
the right to use STAIMO at any time.
5.
User shall observe the information provided on www.staimo.org. User shall

use the most recent version of STAIMO available on the web site at that time.
6.
In case User encounters any error or any problem in the use of STAIMO User
shall inform STA-Group immediately and provide required information on this
problem through info@staimo.org.
By downloading STAIMO, User accepts, and places himself under the obligation to observe
the above Conditions of Use.

STAIMO Example Report - Training Case 1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

STAIMO Example Report - Training Case 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ANALYSIS OF SPEED/POWER TRIAL DATA

ITTC 7.5 04 01 1.1 & 1.2

Report No. 14325

Printing date: Thursday, 18 September 2014

Trial date: Wednesday, 29 May 2013

Calculation date: Thursday, 18 September 2014

Verification of calculation on www.staimo.org with verification code 6593

Report No. 14325

Sea trials M.V. Bulker

Model test report No.

Verification of calculation on www.staimo.org with verification code 6593

Report No. 14325

PARTICULARS OF SHIP AND TRIAL..................................................................................5

ANALYSIS OF SPEED TRIAL RESULTS ..........................................................................10

CONTRACT / SERVICE CONDITION ................................................................................19

EEDI CONDITION ...............................................................................................................28

CONCLUSIONS FOR CONTRACT ....................................................................................31

CONCLUSIONS FOR EEDI ................................................................................................32

AUTHENTICITY CHECK ....................................................................................................33

CONDITIONS OF USE OF STAIMO SOFTWARE ....................................................................34

Verification of calculation on www.staimo.org with verification code 6593

Report No. 14325

REVIEW OF TABLES AND FIGURES

Verification of calculation on www.staimo.org with verification code 6593

Report No. 14325

The sea trials have been performed on board of M.V. Bulker.

Verification of calculation on www.staimo.org with verification code 6593

Report No. 14325

PARTICULARS OF SHIP AND TRIAL

Contractual trial loading condition

Contract loading condition

Transverse wind exposed area

Table 1 Main particulars in contract trial condition

Table 2 Contract specifications

Verification of calculation on www.staimo.org with verification code 6593

Report No. 14325

EEDI loading condition

Shaft power at EEDI power

Table 3 EEDI specifications

Contractual Environmental conditions

Ideal weather conditions

Deep water, no wind, no

Table 4 Contractual environmental conditions

EEDI Environmental conditions

Table 5 EEDI environmental conditions

Verification of calculation on www.staimo.org with verification code 6593

Report No. 14325

The measurements were performed on 29-05-2013 in the Baltic Sea.

Midship section area

Table 6 Main particulars of the ship at trial

Figure 1 Sign conventions

Verification of calculation on www.staimo.org with verification code 6593

Report No. 14325

Trial run number

Report No. 14325

Swell period (swell waves)

Table 7 Environmental conditions during the speed trial

RUN RUNSET POWERSETTING

Trial run number

Table 8 Measured data

Verification of calculation on www.staimo.org with verification code 6593

Report No. 14325

ANALYSIS OF SPEED TRIAL RESULTS

Verification of calculation on www.staimo.org with verification code 6593