Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In the wake of mass shootings like the massacre in Charleston, South Carolina, last
month, media coverage of the violence is all over social media. Often, it focuses on the
killer.
If you're sharing or "liking" stories about these crimes on Facebook, you may be
inadvertently helping perpetuate the violence -- and new research suggests that kids, in
particular, can be led astray by that attention.
"When kids approve of any kind of violent word or statement or gestures or symbols, it
really increases the likelihood that they'll go on to commit violent acts in the future,"
said Dr. Tom Dishion, a psychologist at Arizona State University and the study's lead
author. "Kids are very sensitive to the audience."
The Arizona State University researchfinds that sharing negative or violent news -- and
receiving feedback in the form of "likes" and comments -- may beget aggressive behavior
in children.
While previous research has shown that exposure to violent media overall can increase
aggressive behavior in children, the new study indicates that parents might want to pay
particular attention to the way that their kids are engaging with violent news on social
media.
The researchers don't know whether the same connection applies to adults. But the
study suggests that not "liking" posts about violence on social media may be one way to
halt the spread of violence.
Dishion explained by way of example: A person who posts a racist joke on his or her
Facebook page and receives lots of likes and positive comments will find it easier to use
racist language offline. Similarly, when children who share violence online are
essentially told by their peers that they did the right thing, they're more likely to carry
out violent deeds in the real world.
Peer approval is highly reinforcing for children -- a phenomenon Dishion refers to as the
"Beavis and Butthead effect."
"Kids are very sensitive to peer approval, and they're likely to change their norms and
values based on subtle signs of approval -- or even on the opportunity to have an
audience," he said.
Dishion emphasizes that the media have a role to play here, too. It's possible that the
glamorization of killers -- the most famous recent example being the Rolling Stone cover
of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev -- may inspire mimicry.
"I think it's a good idea to talk more about the victims and less about the perpetrator,"
Dishion said, adding, "People are very sensitive to media, media attention and now
social media."
The Obamas have talked before about the boundaries they set for their children's screen
time. In a 2012 interview with the Stir, the first lady shared the strict rules they follow
and how she's involved in monitoring virtual study groups.
The girls have limited television and screen time -- none during the week unless its
school-related, because now kids are doing these -- they video chat study groups. And
when theyre doing that, I always go in their room to make sure theyre actually talking
about school ... Kids, instead of how we used to call on the phone and talk about
homework, they get on the computer now and chat. So I dont want to interfere with
that, so I monitor with the teacher to make sure that the kids who were studying
together are actually -- that then theyre studying in a way thats helpful.
It's good to know that on this count, the Obamas are setting an example that's worth
considering as we all look for the right way to integrate technology into our lives.
But it's unclear whether the chief executive who famously fought to bring a BlackBerry
into the White House also respects the same boundary. After all, parents need to model
screen sense themselves: Kids tend to use screens as we do, not as we say.
Google Will Soon Let You Buy Things Using Your Voice
Just say what you want and tap to have it shipped. Like
magic.
"Conversational search is also really important -- were seeing more shoppers literally
asking Google to help them learn more about products. So were rolling out new
experiences that answer them right back," Jonathan Alferness, vice president of product
management at Google Shopping, wrote in a blog post.
Here's something to keep in mind if you plan to use voice search for shopping, though:
Google has thus far stored voice data for features like Google Now, so if you're wearing
an Android Wear smartwatch and ask it to "send a text to Sweetie saying 'I love you,'"
that recording is sticking around on Google's servers. You can revisit these precious
moments -- which may now include you asking Google things like "what's the best
electric toothbrush?" -- in the "Voice and Audio Activity" panel in your privacy
dashboard.
It should be noted, of course, that Google says the recordings are kept private, and you
can delete them whenever. You can also disable this history function, though Google
notes the recordings will still "be stored using anonymous identifiers."
The new Purchases on Google feature will be tied to a user's Google account credentials.
So, you won't have to type in your credit card number and send that information to
specific merchants.
According to Alferness' post, the new feature is "in early experiments with a limited
number of retailers." Moving forward, more may be included.