Professional Documents
Culture Documents
indisB'#B,H
peoples
June 1997
i
i
^Nl%
%-tN
ATSIC
soldood _
srioua6roul
rr r
rolsanssl
-t
>g
Contents
Foreword
'10 Point Plan
Key Questions on the
4-9
3.
4.
the 10 Point
title on pastoral
5.
6.
leases?
is
Does
the l0 Point
10-18
19
June 1 997
Copies of this report, and other native title publicatrons
are available on the lnternet at http://www.atsic.gov.au
lssues
saldoad snoueEtpul
lol
sanssl
alltla^!leN pue
lt/l
aql
]l
aruelda::p aq] uo paspq sr upld ]urod 0[ aq] ]eq] surel) ]uauura^o9 aql
']uau]
leq]
srql
1966L raqu-rala6
legislationonthel0PointPlan. Whetherthedraftlegislationclearsuppointsof
uncertainty or simply confuses the issues with its detail remains to be seen. ln
any event, the dramatic impact the 10 Point Plan will have on the rights of
indigenous people is already certain.
ln conclusion, I wish to emphasis that indigenous people have made clear
from the outset that we accept the principle of co-existence with pastoralists,
and that we agree to the confirmation of pastoralists' existing rights, in legislation if that is necessary. However, we are not prepared to see an expansion of
pastoralists' rights at the expense of native title.
lndigenous people remain prepared to take part in bona fide negotiations
with governments and industry groups to develop fair and practical arrangements that will bring certainty for all parties.
@k*
Gatjil Djerrkura OAM
Chairman
ATSIC
The Wik Peoples v Queensland and Ors (1996) 121 ALR 129
Mabo v Queensland (No2) (1992) 175 CLR 1
lssues
966
I raqula^oN
leuolleN
9661
pV
a)ualsixao]
lulod 0 [ aq] 'lle ur 1;y 6urpeaq auo ueqi arou lapun q]lM ]leap are q)rqM ]o
auros 'sanssr aleredas jo Jaqurnu e Ja^o) sburpeeq aql jo aLUoS s6urppaq ..rofeu.r
ua] are
'uorssa5 6uud5
aq] ur luaurerlred olur )t!/1 ol asuodsar aq] puP sluaLupuaure 966 1 aq] 6ur
paler6alur ue a)npollur o1 sasodo.rd
aql
,anol
]uaurura^o9
]uaurpuaue
llrE
's1qbu a;]r] anrleu 6urqsrn6urya pue 6unnpar
+o uorpairp
aql ur raqun+ uana saob ueld ]ulod 0 L aql 's)oas ]uaururo^og aqi q)rqM
,{}ureUa: pasparlur pue firlrqe>1ronn panordu.r aq} ro} adr:ar aqi,i;preq sr srql
'spunor6 raqlo pup
leuorlnlrlsuo3 uo suno) aql ur sa6ualleq) pup uorlualuol
'uorsnluol ur
]lnsa.r
lpnn uorlelsr6al pasodord aq]'rea^ ]sel lno palurod sy
,s1qOu al]l] a^tleu ]ueuodutt {enne du}s s}uaupuautP asaqf
e;doad snoua6rpur o1 uraruol rofeu yo aram 'saseal le]o]sed 1o 6urper6dn
aq] pup 'ssa:ord srl.rel) aq] o1 6ut1e;at slaueu snoup^ 'a1et1oOa5 o] ]q6!U
all] ]o uorlerado aq] 6urura:uor ,{;leoadsa 's}uaupuau.re asoql sa^r}piuasardar
snoua6rpur qlrm uorlellnsuo: alenbape ]noqlrm '966; 6uunp ]uau.turalog aq]
,iq padopanap VIN aq1 o] sluaupuaute xalduo: sla^ol oslp ueld ]utod 0 [ aql
;1!/1
+o
a)eM oql ur sarped ;1e ro1 ,ilurepar ro,t 6utptnotd s;esodotd +o ]as a^tsuaqatduo:
e qIM ]uaulula^og aql paprnotd a^pq sa^tleluasaldat snoua6tpu; 'suotlsanb 6ut
-puelslno a^losa] o1 sraurLu pue slsrlProlsed 'sluauu:ano6 qlrrvt q1tel poo6 ul a1e
-rlo6au o1 ssau6url;rnn lrall] pup ,itessarau 1r uorle;sr6a; ,iq 'paurtluor slstleroped
,to sarl^r]le aleuLrlr6a; aq] 6uraas o1 ]uauaar6e Jroq] palelrpul a^eq slsa.lalul
snouabrpul ,ienn ;errperd pue rej e ur pabeueu aq plnol a)ualsrxa-or Moq pup
'sarped al]t1 a^tlpu qlrnn uotletlo6au pa:tnbat slstletolsed ,(q panstnd salll^lpP
ureual raqiaqM papnl)ur asaql '(y117) DV all1 a^/leN aq] lo uorlerado aq] 1o
]xaluol aq] ur [1re1n:!ued'suol]sonb auos asreJ prp uorst)ap aq]'ssalaqua^aN
slsrlerolsed u-ror; nq6u ou,ienne )oo] uorsllap llA a\I
raploq
asea; lerolsed aq] ]o asoql o1 aleurpJoqns are s1q6u alltl a^tleu 's1q6u asoqi
)ro asr).raxa aq] ur lltlluo) st araq] aiaqM '7 ii o1 6urpror:e la^aMoH sasPal Iaq]
]o srl-r.ra1 aq] rapun slsr;erolsed o1 par.raluol stqOu qllm ]srxa-o) ue) allrl anrleu
]eq] a! 'alu] antleu qsrnOutya [;uessa:au ]ou saop aseal ;etolsed e ;o 1uet6 aqi
]eq] papr)ap pno] q615 a+'1!/1 ul asel 4!/1 aq ul]ino) q6tg aqt ]o uorsr)ap
aq] o] asuodser anr1e1sr6al pasodord tluauuranoD aq] saurllno ueld ]urod 0t aql
leqi '!
lndigenous interests made clear from the outset that they did not accept that
native title was necessarily extinguished in law by the grant of a pastoral lease.
As well, the Nafive Title Act 7993 did not attempt to resolve this matter
by statute. lt was agreed at the time that indigenous Australians would not be
prevented from attempting to establish therr native title rights on pastoral leases
at common law. In fact, relevant provisions of the NtR assume the possible
continued existence of native title on pastoral leases.
The Government knew of the possibility of the continued existence of native
lssues
/66t
ua1
aql
9L 'olpeu )BV
'|i\d
^en
'(er;erlsny
lou
[q
sr saspal
aq1
'pueq lal{}o oqi uO 'al}t} ant}pu 1o saldr:uud aq} }tedsal o} surell }uauula^og
aql 'alll] a^lleu +o luauqstn6utya ]a)uelq lo autl-auo papafat seq ]uaulula^oD
all] 'pueq auo uO upld aq] 1o padse 6utsnluot ]sou.r aq] sdeqtad s! sltll
lerolsed uo
asaseal
1sa1 uorlerpl6ar raq6rq aql iaalu oqM slaploq al]ll a^tleu llp o] alqelte^e
6uraq 1ou sasodrnd teuotltper] ro+ saseal ;etoysed o] ssa)le fuolnlels
salllAl]lP
',
euPld
aql qlrn oldoad snoua6lpu!lo suleruo) uleu aql are leqm '
5. What happens
Where the Right to Negotiate still applies, it will be reduced in scope and
restricted in opeiation so as to result in considerable diminution of its utility in
protecting native title rights. The Right to Negotiate, a central provision of the
NTA, will be effectively reduced to a shadow of its original intent'
lssues
'i!1uno:
leuorlrpel]
aql
,r,,r^:l5lr;:::
asraplorl
.a
]l
auo!l!ullep
,,uolpnpord fueurgrd,, aql 6ufldde;o pa#a aql s! teqln .9
Commentary on each
1. Validation
of acts/grants between
111194
and 23112196
Legislative action will be taken to ensure that the validity of a1y acts or
grints made in relation to non-vacant crown land in the period between
[assage of the Native Title Ad (NTA) and the Wrk decision is put beyond
doubt.
lndigenous representatives have made clear their agreement to the confirmation
of all pastoral acts conducted within the terms of existing pastoral leases.
Typically, this would cover raising livestock and incidental activities such as
establishing fences, yards, bores, mills and accommodation.
The validation of grants is a different question. These grants include many
exploration and mining tenements. All governments were on notice that the
question of native title on pastoral leases had not been resolved in the courts
and that the NTA provides processes (provisions for the Right to Negotiate and
for non-claimant applications) for making such grants with certainty Only
Western Australia extensively used these processes. ln States which chose not to
use the processes, native title holders were effectively denied the Right to
Negotiate, including over some large mining developments.
The Government's proposal for blanket validation of grants is inherently
unfair, offers little to natrve title holders whose rights have been side-stepped,
and rewards those states which have ignored or defied the provisions of the
NTA. Yet, the Commonwealth will provide 75 per cent of the compensation
costs to native title holders with the States to fund the other 25 per cent. ln the
circumstances, this is certainly a generous offer on the part of the Commonwealth.
There may also be problems for one-line validation in meeting Constitutional
requirements in respect of "just terms" compensation, when the people entitled
are in no position to know that their rights have been affected by the validation.
lssues
.o.aooooCor
slq6u allrl
a^rleu +o ]uauqsrnourlxa pa++a leq] s]le asoll] +o uolsualxa paullsnlun uP aq o]
sreadde lpsodord stqj utaql uo slq6u alll] a^tleu asDlaxa o1 alqlssod lllls sl ]l pue
sarn]lnrls Iq paranor ]ou are salnol )lols 'upld ]utod g; ;eurOtto aq1 ut teadde
lou saop al]r] a^tlpu 6utqstn6utya se s)loM tt;qnd qttnn papnl)ut aq plnoM salnol
]P uorsr^ord nnau aq1
aLU :4!Nl +o S Z
a6esn lern11nru6e o1
sra+ar qlrqM aseal ,{ue uo luauqstn6ur}xa }a)uelq luaualdutt o} sa}e}s lo} a)ualll
p o] lunoure plno) srq] 'paproM sr uorle;sr6a; leuq aq] Moq uo 6utpuada6 puel
letny;nru6e {1nri1ou sr puelaq} qOnoql uana sasodtnd letn1;ntu6e apnllutosle
saseal lerolsed auos 'papualur seM uotssossod antsn;:xa alellput ,ieu 6utddotl
a^rsualur arual-oi-alua+ allqM 'ura)uol teln:tyed e a.le sasealJetnl;n:tt6y
'uor6ar IalraqLur;1 aqt ur ,{qraq
]o quou eare 6ururer] Aelr;lur luelel a6te1 e ]o qllpaMUou-lLltol aq] o] luau
-u.ra^og
aLll ,iq
aq] pue suorletodlol 6urploq al]l] o] slted ;euotleu
tuer6
vM
page {;;eutou }ou pnoM puel
1o s1uer6 aql apnllut salduexl al]t] anllpu
aq] +o asn aq1 q6noqt uana lesodotd stq] lapun al]t1 a^rleu qstnOutya lltM sluaul
-utano6 iaqlo o] ro saoua6e
laqlo o] s1uet6 unaotS 'ri1,te1tu.tt5
]uauutano6
'puel uMor) ]uP)e^ ,il1uarn:
1o padsal
aq} a^eq ue:'paqsrnbutlal uaaq 6uolaneq
urslqbu alyl a^rlpu 6ul{uap
}la}+a
}o
{eu LllLlM }o auos 's}uel6 puel alqel^-uou
q)rqM ro dn
ua>1e1
,{ue sapng:ard
'(l
'uorssassod aAtsnllxa
}l
aql
^q
qlrm sleap q)rqM 'paulp/dx1 uep lulod OL aqt:>tlA ]o E'Z ]ulod
1o 6ur;npaq:s
slqOu a;tr1 a^tleu Mel uotl.ttlto) 6utlstxa
,{1}uarnr ;o luauqsrn6utya antle;sl6al e }la#a ,ieLu pasodold uotleult,tuol
aq] ']se) sr ]au aq] aplM Moq uo 6utpuadap 'leq] uJa)uol sr alaq] 'al111 a^rleu
qsrn6urixa saseal lerluaprsa.r pue s1uer6 p;oqaat,t alenud teqt palda:re sl l! ]sllqM
uo
soJnuol ,,eA!snlrxa,,
]o
tl)ea uo
lteluawwo)
aaaaaaaa
a......a
Uel
Commentary on each
3. Provision of Services
lmpediments to the provision of government seruices in relation to land
on which native title may exist would be removed.
This proposal is obscure. lt seems to mean that native title holders will not be
treated the same as ordinary title holders, and will not be able to exercise the
procedural rights of ordinary title holders in respect of the provision of municipal
services by governments and local governments, short of those requiring compulsory acquisition of native title. The proposal is aimed particularly at rural and
remote areas.
Depending on the definition provided for such activities, there is the potential
for significant diminution of native title rights. Local councils may be able to
largely ignore native title holders, leaving indigenous people as onlookers in the
management and control of native title land.
Current provisions in the NTA are adequate to deal with these matters, and
local authorities should be encouraged to negotiate Co-operative arrangements
All activities pursuant to, or incidental to, "primary production" (this will
be based on ihe definition in the Incom e Tax Assessment Act 1934 would
be allowed on pastoral leases including farmstay tourism, even if native
title exists, provided the dominant purpose of the use of the land is
primary production. However, future government action such as upgrad'
ing of iitie to perpetual or "exclusive" leases or freehold, would necessi'
taie the acquisition of any native title rights proven to exist and the
apptication of the regime described in 7 below (except where this is
unnecessary because the pastoralist has an existing legally enforceable
right to upgrade).
Pastoral leases generally limit the rights of pastoralists to grazing and incidental
purposes. The definition of primary production based on the /ncorne Tax Assessment Act 1936 is much wider including agriculture, horticulture, fishing and
forest operations. Lifting the NTA future act processesl from all prrmary production as proposed will provide for States to authorise much more intensive use of
'
5ee G/ossa,y
lssues
o..aooro
Con
8d'6t' g I seEd
pu?Fuaano
's.ra)JoM
s,lPJaua9
saop
roN
;eut6uoqy
ol sa6em lenba ane6 Lllrr.{M asel (tto1pta1 uraqttoN) fuynpulalllp:) 896 [ aq]
'saull] lualal /ilentlelaJ ul palln))o
+o a)eM ar.ll ut 's0/ puP s096; aqt 6utpn1:ul
uauo seq ,tluno: o] ssa))P +o ssol slql ,!]uno: leuorilpPl] llaLl] o] ssal)P
6urneq uror,L pa6erno:stp {lantpe to paluanald uaaq a^ell aldoad leut6ttoqy
,iue4
slueurell
'uorlelst6al
'S
aql
0t
aql
]o
tl)ea uo
lteluawwo) .. o.....
.a....4a
UPl,
Commentary on each
The aftermath of the payment of award wages was the widespread dispossession of Aboriginal communities living on pastoral leases.
The Government's proposal means that those who currently have access will
have that situation confirmed. However, those who have strong traditional
affiliations but have been denied access may not obtain the access they seek
even when they have passed the stringent registration test for their claim.
The requirement for current physical access is illogical, unfair, and rewards
those pastoralists who have obstructed lawful access to traditional country.
lndeed it may encourage pastoralists to deny access prior to the commencement
of the amendments.
curent or former
pastorat leasehold land and national parks, the right to negotiate would
continue to apply in a state or territory unless and until that state or
territory provided a statutory regime acceptable to the Commonwealth
which included procedural rights at least equivalent to other parties with
an interest in the land (eg the holder of the pastoral lease) and compensation which can take account of the nature of co'existing native title
rights (where they are proven to exist).
In relation to mining activity on vacant Crown land, the 10 Point Plan is essentially stating that the GovernmentS previously proposed amendments to the
Right to Negotiate will go ahead. These amendments impact on most parts of
the operation of the Right to Negotiate provisions. They will, among other
changes, make it harder for native title holders to access the Right to Negotiate
(through a more stringent registration test), allow only one Right to Negotiate for
projects (either through exclusion of exploration or through a conjunctive
agreement covering both exploration and mining), and make it easier for
governments to avoid or override negotiations (eg through increased opportunity
for ministerial intervention).
The extingurshment proposals under Point 2 in respect of "exclusive tenures"
will cut out the Right to Negotiate processes altogether for affected areas.
These changes will significantly reduce the rights of indigenous people to
have some say about activity on their land and 9o well beyond the requirements
of workability. The Right to Negotiate reflects the special quality of the attachment that indigenous people have to land. lt reflects indigenous law and custom
and can be seen as an incident of native title. lt is not possible for the Government to significantly reduce the operation of the Right to Negotiate and at the
same time claim to be respecting the principles of native title.
lssues
for lndigenous
Peoples
....
oooo
Con
uo la^er6
sp q)ns
;etnn11e
-6rpur ro1 uorsr)ap 4!/1A aL$ +o sauollno lpo4auaq eql 6ur,!r1;nu sptennol ,{enn
6uo; e saob saseal lerolsed 1o padsar ut a1et1o6a5 o] ]qOlU aq] +o lenoual aql
'sjaplot] al]!] a^lleu aq] ale ,{aqt q:tqnn Jo} puPl
aq] uo s;esodord luaudolanap 6ututul lnoqe a1et1o6au o] {}tunuoddo aq1 patuap
aq lllnn (pue1 unnor: lup)p^ Mou st puel aq] alaqm pue pauopueqP uaaq a^Pq
qlrqM saseal ;erolsed lauro] uana ro) sasPal lelolsed uo st puel asoqM s.laploq
allr] a^rlpu ]eq] sueau ]l 'sraploq al]!] a^rleu 1o slq6u aq] o1 ]uaurrlap ]uel
-rlru6rs ]o sr pup \!A ol asuodsar EluauulanoD aqt 1o 1:adse tofeu e st stql
'(asea1
letolsed
aq] +o raploq aq] s! pap!^old alduexa aqt) puel aq] ur ]satalut ue Lllrm salued
raqlo se s1q6u ;ernpa:otd aules aq1,i1a.raLu staploq al]!] a^lleu tol 6utptnotd
solels aq] ol palqns 'alergobap o] ]q6lu aq] a]eurulla o] sasodotd ueld ]ulod 0L
aqt 'are;d sa>1e1 ,{ltntpe 6ututt-tt 1o uotpodotd let}ue}sqns e }le+ ut alaqM 'saseal
lerolsed JauJol Jo ]ualrn) se qtns 'sainua] ,,antsnl)xa-uou,, o] uotlelat ul
0t aql ]o
q)ea uo t{teluawwo)
........
....a.oa
UOl,
Commentary on each
Under the current NTA any compulsory acquisition of native title rights for the
benefit of a third party must go through the Right to Negotiate procedure.
The 10 Point Plan takes away this right where:
the third party is providing government-type infrastructure (ie private
.
.
These proposals represent a significant loss of rights for native title holders.
ln respect of privately developed infrastructure, this proposal raises
problems of definition between "government-type" infrastructure (para7.2 of
Explanation document) and what is clearly for private purposes. lt is understood
that since the Explanation document was released, this exemption from the
Right to Negotiate has been widened-out to cover dedicated infrastructure
associated with mining projects, ie private purpose infrastructure.
ln respect of towns and cities the proposal means that native title rights will
yield to others, such as subdivision developers, with only the limited procedural
lssues
...ooooo
Coll
aq.t
's..raupur
s.raplor.l allr] a^rlPu o] qloq ]uatul]lap aq] o] aq plnoM slql uolleululla lenlua^a
ro1 pa1a6re1 aq ,{eu.r lpunqr{ al}lj a^lieN Ieuor}eN aq} }eq} sreadde 11 letyedul
ssarord sulel) aql ]eq1 aluapt+uo) utelal o] a.rP staploq al]!] a^lleu ll sluP
sr
jo asr).laxa {ue o} sa}e}S atuos ,iq pa}tqtqxa ustuot}lnl}sqo pue ,{1t1t1soq aq}
uanrb 'ura:uor roleur ,to arp sultell alpueq o1 salels aqI abetno:ua o] salnsealA
,iur}nr:s aso;: arrnbar llrM sutel) 1o luaula6eueul aq} 6utula:uol slesodol6
'pa)nporlu! aq
plnoM apeu aq ol aAeq plnon sulel) n au ql!qr',t ultlllrn asnel) lasuns V
'lqnop puor(aq
lnd aq plnoil au!6ar luaua6eueu Io fuolelnEar q)ns ,(ue rapun slsalalu!
pue sa)Inosal aroqs-#o 'Iale/h o)Pl
ol sluauu.la^oolo A1;lqe aq1
a.......
Uel,
10. Agreements
Measures would be introduced to facilitate the negotiation of voluntary
but binding agreements as an alternative to more formal native title
machinery.
Agreements provide a potentially useful mechanism for dealing with development and native title. However, the other proposals of the t 0 Point Plan may
reduce their utility. There may be little incentive for governments and others to
negotiate agreements if there is to be such an extinguishment of native title and,
where it survives, such a dismantling of the Right to Negotiate.
Reference
For details of the indigenous position in respect
lssues
'allll a^rleu redur l0 qsrnourlxa qlrqM slle rol uollPsuadu0) sujrat ]sn[ o]
pallltua ate taploq alll} a^tleu leql st aul6al ]le alnlnj aql ]o padse iaqlouv
'slqbu allli a^lieu aql allnble
.
^luoslndulol
aql utelqo
lo ls.rapl0q allll a^!leu aql jo luaujaaj6P
leare leq] r0] sjapl0q alI] a^rlpu 0u
asn .
'(lla
marnar luapuadaput
jl
sl ])P
s,]auMo aqi
ll
ptoqae4 o] rr op
]ouuerliffirJ:Lrur]J1,.
'sar;dde a1erlo6ap
o1 1q6rg
aq Isaralur 6ururm
,ir,r,
1t .
:i{reuuns
u1
t66
raue slre luauurarroo ateln6ar qrrqnr sMel aql lelaua6 ut sueaul slql
our!6ar
lre aJnlnj
s1q6;.r
leJnParoJd
eq] ]r prle^ur aq plnom 'sluauaua] 6ururu ,(1]som 'sluerb aql (966 l raqualac
y) 9661 DV apj aNteN eqllo luaui
EZ) uolspap \/yt aq pue (y669 /'rcnueS
-a)uauju.rol aql 10 alep aqt uaamlaq apeu sruerb pue s]re prle^ur ,(ller1uaiod 11e
ur ,,u0rleptle^
la)uelq,,
,i1le;tLlt5
le
uo!lep!le^
laluelq
'saseal
p
py,{q
lerolsed 6a'puel 1o fuobate: aloqm ia^o altll a^rleu io ]uauprped 1o
]uauqsrnburlxa aql 0I sralar ,,luauqstnburlxa talUelg,, auLtl yo pouad e tano
srql sal}rlDei rr;qnd 1o 6utpltnq aqt se qxs tlqbu
alll] a^llpu 6urnurluor q]!M ]ualslsuo)ul asodrnd e roj puel uMOl) luple^ jo
asn aqi ,{q
ro'altrt ploqaa4
lenpt^rput ,iq
'auio)]n0 palerlrqre ue
luauqsrnEuplxa
laluelq
e ro1 'aletlo6au
o] ]qbu e a^eq IlrM slueurel) pup eaploq allll a^rlpu paralsrbaL rfued prrqt e ot
1uer6 e 6u11eu 1o asodrnd aql i01 altll a^rlpu ]o uorlsrnbte fuoslnduot aqi pue
'6ururu 6ursuoqlnp s]le luauJUralo6 io1 teqt 5aprnord Dy allgy a^rleN aql 'tpuel
raq] 0l a^eq aldoad snoua6rpur leq] ]uauqlelle 1er:ads aq] 1o uorlru6otat u;
a1e;1o6ep
ol lr{6!U
........
UPl,
luoTEs