You are on page 1of 1

Federal Register / Vol. 73, No.

7 / Thursday, January 10, 2008 / Proposed Rules 1853

inconsistent with applicable law for revisions concern oxides of nitrogen SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, (NOX) emissions from internal proposal addresses the following local
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission combustion engines and stationary gas rules: SJVAPCD Rule 4702 and
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of turbines. We are proposing to approve SMAQMD Rule 413. In the Rules and
the CAA. Thus, the requirements of local rules to regulate these emission Regulations section of this Federal
section 12(d) of the National sources under the Clean Air Act as Register, we are approving these local
Technology Transfer and Advancement amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). rules in a direct final action without
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not DATES: Any comments on this proposal prior proposal because we believe these
apply. As required by section 3 of must arrive by February 11, 2008. SIP revisions are not controversial. If we
Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, ADDRESSES: Submit comments, receive adverse comments, however, we
February 7, 1996), in issuing this identified by docket number EPA–R09– will publish a timely withdrawal of the
proposed rule, EPA has taken the OAR–2007–1104, by one of the direct final rule and address the
necessary steps to eliminate drafting following methods: comments in subsequent action based
errors and ambiguity, minimize 1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: on this proposed rule. Please note that
potential litigation, and provide a clear www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line if we receive adverse comment on an
legal standard for affected conduct. EPA instructions. amendment, paragraph, or section of
has complied with Executive Order 2. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov. this rule and if that provision may be
12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by 3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel severed from the remainder of the rule,
examining the takings implications of (Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection we may adopt as final those provisions
the rule in accordance with the Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, of the rule that are not the subject of an
‘‘Attorney General’s Supplemental San Francisco, CA 94105–3901. adverse comment.
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk Instructions: All comments will be We do not plan to open a second
and Avoidance of Unanticipated included in the public docket without comment period, so anyone interested
Takings’’ issued under the executive change and may be made available in commenting should do so at this
order. This action proposing approval of online at www.regulations.gov, time. If we do not receive adverse
Maryland’s SIP revision concerning including any personal information comments, no further activity is
emission limitations for NOX and SO2 at provided, unless the comment includes planned. For further information, please
15 coal-fired EGUs does not impose an Confidential Business Information (CBI) see the direct final action.
information collection burden under the or other information whose disclosure is Dated: December 5, 2007.
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction restricted by statute. Information that Jane Diamond,
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.). you consider CBI or otherwise protected Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 should be clearly identified as such and [FR Doc. E8–174 Filed 1–9–08; 8:45 am]
should not be submitted through
Environmental protection, Air BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
www.regulations.gov or e-mail.
pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide, www.regulations.gov is an
Reporting and recordkeeping ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, and EPA
requirements, Sulfur oxides. will not know your identity or contact DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq. information unless you provide it in the Defense Acquisition Regulations
Dated: December 27, 2007. body of your comment. If you send e- System
mail directly to EPA, your e-mail
William T. Wisniewski,
address will be automatically captured 48 CFR Part 252
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
and included as part of the public
[FR Doc. E8–276 Filed 1–9–08; 8:45 am] comment. If EPA cannot read your RIN 0750–AF82
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification, Defense Federal Acquisition
EPA may not be able to consider your Regulation Supplement; DoD Law of
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION comment. Electronic files should avoid War Program (DFARS Case 2006–
AGENCY the use of special characters, any form D035)
40 CFR Part 52 of encryption, and be free of any defects AGENCY: Defense Acquisition
or viruses. Regulations System, Department of
[EPA–R09–OAR–2007–1104; FRL–8512–8] Docket: The index to the docket for Defense (DoD).
this action is available electronically at ACTION: Proposed rule with request for
Revisions to the California State www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
Implementation Plan, San Joaquin comments.
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
Valley Air Pollution Control District San Francisco, California. While all SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend
and Sacramento Metropolitan Air documents in the docket are listed in the Defense Federal Acquisition
Quality Management District the index, some information may be Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to
AGENCY: Environmental Protection publicly available only at the hard copy address requirements for DoD
Agency (EPA). location (e.g., copyrighted material), and contractors to institute effective
some may not be publicly available in programs to prevent violations of law of
ACTION: Proposed rule.
either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the war by contractor personnel authorized
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve hard copy materials, please schedule an to accompany U.S. Armed Forces
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS

revisions to the San Joaquin Valley Air appointment during normal business deployed outside the United States.
Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) hours with the contact listed in the FOR DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
and Sacramento Metropolitan Air FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. should be submitted in writing to the
Quality Management District FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: address shown below on or before
(SMAQMD) portions of the California Francisco Dóñez, EPA Region IX, (415) March 10, 2008 to be considered in the
State Implementation Plan (SIP). These 972–3956, Donez.Francisco@epa.gov. formation of the final rule.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:28 Jan 09, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10JAP1.SGM 10JAP1

You might also like