Professional Documents
Culture Documents
11. Lara EC, Carlos GPJ, Kubodera IT, Margarita MN. Dental arch morphology
of Mazahua and mestizo teenagers from central Mexico. Braz J Oral Sci 2007.
8(2): 92-6.
12. Pundayani PS. Perbandingan lebar lengkung basal dan lengkung gigi rahang
atas pada maloklusi kelas II divisi I dan oklusi normal remaja keturunan Cina
di kodya Yogyakarta. MIKGI 2004; 6(12): 340-3.
13. Swasonoprijo S, Susilowati. Studi banding morfologi dan indeks : kepala,
wajah, hidung pada orang Toraja dan Naulu. Sci&Tech, 2002; 3(3): 28-36.
14. Argyropoulos E, Sassouni V. Comparison of the dentofacial patterns for
native Greek and American Caucasian adolescent. American Journal
Orthodontist 1989; 95: 48-238.
15. Arthadini VD, Anggani HS. Perubahan lengkung gigi di dalam perawatan
ortodonti. M.I. Kedokteran Gigi 2008; 23(4): 199-4.
16. Gunawan S. Perbandingan ukuran dan bentuk lengkung gigi rahang bawah
anatara suku Jawa dan suku Papua. Skripsi. Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi
Universitas Gajah Mada, 2002.
17. Novrida Z. Ukuran dan bentuk lengkung gigi rahang bawah pada mahasiswa
Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Sumatera Utara. (Skripsi). Medan;
Universitas Sumatera Utara: 2007.
18. Hasibuan MK. Ukuran dan bentuk lengkung gigi rahang bawah pada
mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi USU ras Deutro Melayu. (Skripsi).
Medan; Universitas Sumatera Utara: 2009.
19. Lavelle CLB, Foster TD, Flinn RM. Dental arches in various ethnic groups. J
Angle Orthod 1971; 41(4): 293-9.
20. Suri S, Tompson BD, Cornfoot L Cranial base, maxillary and mandibular
morphology in Down syndrome. J Angle Orthod 2010; 80 (5): 861-9.
21. Lindsten R, Ogaard B, Larsson E, Bjerklin K. Transverse dental and dental
arch depth dimensions in the mixed dentition in a skeletal sample from the
14th to the 19 th century and Norwegian children and Norwegian sami
children of today. J Angle Orthod 2002 ; 72(5) : 439-447.
22. Aznar T, Galan AF, Marin I, Dominguez A. dental arch diameters and
relationships to oral habits. J Angle orthod 2006 ;76(3) : 441-5.
23. Olmez S, Dogan S. Comparison of the arch form and dimensions in various
malocclusions of the Turkish population. Open Journal of Stomatology 2011;
1: 158-164.
24. Kuswahyuning S. Perubahan ukuran lengkung gigi sebagai pertimbangan
dalam observasi pada periode gigi geligi bercampur. Kongres Nasional XVI
Persatuan Dokter Gigi Indonesia 1985: 2-6.
25. Taner TS, Hakan, Germec, et al. Evaluation of dental arch width and form
changes after orthodontic treatment and retention with a new computerized
method. Am J Orthod and Dentofac 2004; 126(4): 464-75.
26. Ling JYK, Wong RWK. Dental arch width of Shouthern Chinese. The EH
Angle Education and Research Foundation,Inc 2009; 54-63.
27. Poosti M, Jalali T. Tooth size and arch dimension in uncrowded versus
crowded class I malocclusions. J Contemp Dent Prac 2007; 8(3):1-8.
28. Thu KM, Abdullah N, Jayasinghe JAP, Chandima GL. The maxillary arch
and its relationship to cephalometric landmarks of selected Malay ethnic
group. Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences 2005; 12(1): 29-38.
29. Nojima K, McLaughlin, RP, Isshiki, Y, Sinclair PM. A comparison study of
Caucasian and Japanese mandibular clinical arch form. J Angle Orthod
2001; 71: 195-200.
30. Daldjoeni N. Ras-ras umat manusia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1991.
189-191.
31. Koesoemahardja HD, Nasution FH, Trenggono BS. Antropologi untuk
mahasiswa kedokteran gigi. Jakarta: Universitas Trisakti; 2005: 41-9.
32. Andy RH. Kajian etnik pemilih pilkada Sumut. Kompas. 17 April 2008.
<http://nasional.kompas.com>
33. Priyanto D. 5 jam belajar olah data dengan SPSS 17. Yogyakarta: Andi
Offset, 2009.
34. Braun S, William P, Dana E, Harry L. The form of the human dental arch.
Angle Orthod 1998; 68(1): 29-36.
35. Agnihotri G, Gulati M. Maxillary molar and premolar indices in North
Indians: A Dimorphic Study. The internet Journal of Biological Anthropology
2008; 2(1).
36. Graber TM. Orthodontics principles and practice, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB
Saunders Co, 1972. 176-9.