Professional Documents
Culture Documents
">
now
MAR 2
m 23 2ms
Rita M. Wyatt
Plaintiff,
v.
SunTrust Bank
Defendant.
Comes now Class Member William Spencer Connerat, III, who intends toobject and who does
hereby object to the Class Action Settlement Agreement (ECF No. 62) for the reason that the settlement
proposed is inadequate to provide for the loss incurred by the Defendant'swanton and willful violation of
the Fair Credit Reporting Act. In particular, Mr. Connerat believes that the SunTrust payment ofTWO
HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND ANDNO/100 ($250,000.00) should be increased tenfold, toTWO
MILLION FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND ANDNO/100 ($2,500,000.00) which sum is more reasonable
to comprise liquidated and treble damages, as many have been irreparably harmed bythe callous and
lawless actions of SunTrust Bank in its choice to disobey the law.
Connerat received an offer tojoin SunTrust as a Personal Banker IV, inPalm Harbor, Florida,
with an annual salary of$41,900.00, to start July 1, 2013. He arrived at work on that date, only to find
his hiring manager absent. Aftera morning meeting behind theteller line, Connerat received a call at
work from someone in Boston, Massachusetts, who informed this Class Member that he must leavethe
branch, eventhough he had already worked that morning as a Personal Banker with SunTrust. He had no
choice but to leave the branch. There was noreason given, nor compensation offered to Connerat for his
expenses in coming towork that day, nor for the potential opportunities that he set aside (the opportunity
cost) in order tobegin acareer with SunTrust. This blatant disregard for common decency along with the
personal injury caused tothis Class Member is simply another example of theharm caused bythe
Defendant's unlawful actions. Surely there are other Class Members who suffered in private, as well.
Perhaps they have not the means nor ability to represent themselves in this action. In any event, the silent
suffering of other Class Members must beconsidered in deciding what sum of money SunTrust must
equitably contribute to the Settlement Fund.
Regarding the Motion for Warrant for Arrest, in the factual document presented as page four of
this filing, not numbered, there is aclear and present danger inherent in an existence ofthe documentary
evidence of treason known as the Tacit Admission of Ineligibility (Confession inOpen Court) which
certified copy was filed inCuccinelli v. Sebelius 3:10-cv-OOl 88-HEH (Docket No. 94). In that case,
Connerat's subsequent motion to have a Warrant for Arrest issue was denied because the time to file for
all Amicus Curiae, set bythe judge (Docket No. 159), had lapsed. Connerat is fully apprised ofthe rules
of this court and files such potent, valid, and veritable notice of the unlawful usurpation of the executive
branch of theUnited States of America herewith, res ipsa loquitur. OnNovember 11,2008 he wrote the
lninois Senator and demanded, "Humour this Citizen and remove any doubt" regarding his status under
Article II., Section 1 ofthe U.S. Constitution. Please see attached addendum for filed court documents
and background as to procurement of such evidence, ifwarranted. After receiving aReturn Receipt from
the United States Postal Service that his demand letter was delivered to"The White House Office,"
Connerat issued a final Letter of Redress, (U.S. Constitution, Amendment I) which was delivered in like
manner with aReturn Receipt returned amonth later. In this final letter, fair warning was given tothe
addressee that if no reply was made, apromise torecord such malfeasance would be forthcoming.
Such action of a federal judge, issuing aWarrant for Arrest of one who purports to be President,
isnotone which should behandled with caprice but with thoughtful deliberation. No man is above the
law, but the reality is that deference is given toan official, even if he has attained his position through
deceit and subterfuge. Therefore, inthe alternative, a motion for the judge inthis case to issue an Order
Nisi, declaring that the purported President ofthe United States isineligible to the office, based upon his
owntacit admission inthe Pinellas County Courthouse (six years ago tomorrow) unless hecan contradict
such rebuttable presumption of ineligibility and demonstrate his natural born status within a time certain.
The issue of eligibility isone which has caused consternation among the Citizenry and one which
continues to divide our country. Senator Ted Cruz had to actively renounce his Canadian citizenship
recently. Could one who had to act to renounce allegiance at birth to a foreign country beconsidered
natural bora? Senator Marco Rubioseems to wantthejob yet cannot be considered natural born if the
Castro family still lays claim tohim under Cuban law, since his father was arefugee (and not yet aU.S.
Citizen) when he was born. Does having aKenyan father, one loyal tothe sovereign ofGreat Britain, as
the protectorate of East Africa, with the implication that his progeny, under British law, would also be
British circumvent the natural born Citizen requirement? Connerat's motion and his support given thereto
exclude hypothetical reasoning and speculation. His argument that something must be done, under law,
to disprove the duly filed notice, proffered on the following page, is based onlogic. The Tacit Admission
of Ineligibility (Confession in Open Court) would never have been issued had the objective of Connerat's
fair demand, made before the Electoral Vote, been satisfied. The following cannot be ignored:
It takes a fair judge, one who is impartial and above petty discussions of party, power, and race
(which are far too prevalent in America in the 21st century) torule on the motion(s) presented bythis
Class Member. The current occupant ofthe White House has been artfully dodging this issue of law,
which is not aquestion of politics. Now is the time for ajudge to administer wisdom, byimplementing
an impartial ruling which delivers truth, comports with the Constitution, and brings equal justice toall.
***Mr. Connerat does notintend to appear atthe Fairness Hearing scheduled for this matter and
enters hisobjection and motion(s) individually, pro se, and notthrough counsel.
Signed and respectfully submitted viaU.S.P.S. 1st Class Mail on March 17, 2015.
Counsel for Class and for Defendant served viaU.S.P.S. 1st Class Mail on March 17,2015.
I hereby certify that the foregoing statements made byme are true, tothe best ofmyknowledge.
I am aware that if any ofthe foregoing statements made byme is willfully false, or if not made in good
faith, I am subject to punishment.
^~^G
William Spencer Connerat, III
336 Carl Ave.
Belleair, FL 33762
(727)512-2571
sconnerat@aol.com
S"
November 11,2008
^OMASD.HAtL
wtb 15 2008
r -^
^^SOrcEMfeCouar
Senator Obama:
in the recent election for President I watched your speech (itwas midnight,
here in the East) and I applaud you for the hope, inspiration, and kindness
you have given to many folios. Nonetheless, as a U.S. citizen, who did vote
feeling isthat you truly beiieve inconcepts like famiess, and "fair play."
Humour this Citizen and remove anv doubt
The State ofHawaii is also being summoned. Ifa "tangible interest" is not
this case, ofa citizen ensuring that the Constitution is upheld, then there is
no such concept under Law. It is inour collective best interests that you"
produce the sought document, without burdening the Court.
Clearwater, FL 33762-5559
cc)Mr.Thom;asJ.DoiinellyiEsq.
t% l* OOo2S.(o^H ?^oi
Aoi>: 2. of \<t>
Case 3:13-cv-00662-JRS Document 66 Filed 03/23/15 Page 6 of 15 PageID# 419
First-Class Mail
USPS
Sender Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box
i.iiHJhiH>i>ii>t>,tih).h,iiliiiiiiliiaril>>,l,i,),ilMi
First-CJass Mail
inli.HlM'ui.frMnhl.hluJ.inhhi.inihnhiinnni
1. Article Addressed ta
A. Signature
_ _,
C. DateofDelive
May 3
a Senfaelype
5K^rtffl9dWa8
D Express MaU
Registered
D Insured Mail
P C.O.D.
4. RestrictedDelivery?(BtoaFee)
2. Article Number
DYbs
3. Seryjpe-Type
CSfSorBfladMaH
(TteJsferftwnservfcetetep
DomesticReturn Receipt
n Express MaS
D Registered
D Insured Mall
C.O.D.
4. RestrictedDelivery? (Brfra/=eej
DYes
1Q2S9&C2-M-1S
3>
C/
-^
UNC: 522009SC0055223O&CSC
' \H .^J^hV
A'^jl2''
ORDER OF RECUSAL
THIS CAUSE having come on the Court's Own Motion for recusal of assigned Judge. The
Court having considered the motion and being otherwise fully advised, it isthereupon
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the undersigned Judge does hereby recuse herself from any
further hearings in the above styled cause, and this cause shall be reassigned toanother County Court
Judge on a regular rotation basis.
/Wf
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Clearwater, Pinellas County. Florida, this Tfe day ol
2010.
MYR$\ SCOTTJvic/lARY
County Court Jtwrge
5ot\(j>
/Aoo: ^>^/0
r-3
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
DONE AND ORDERED in Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida on this frfo* day of
"]
,2010.
MY$A SCOTXMgMARY
County Court Judge
Clearwater, FL 33762-5559
Case3:10-cv-00188-HEH
Document93
Filed 09/21/10
Page1of1
A&b-7oPf0
Case 3:13-cv-00662-JRS
Document
66 Filed 03/23/15
Page 11 of
15 PageID# 424
v.
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS,
SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT
THIS MATTER is before the Court on an Optional Motion for Leave to File
Amicus Brief(Dk. No. 92), submitted by W. Spencer Connerat, III. Upon due
consideration, this Motion is GRANTED.
Movant included his Brief as Amicus Curiae with the Motion that he filed with the
Court. The Clerk is therefore directed to file Movant's Optional Motion for Leave to File
Amicus Brief(Dk. No. 92) as Movant's Briefas Amicus Curiae Supporting Plaintiff.
The Clerk is directedto send a copy of this Order to ail counsel of record.
It is SO ORDERED.
M
Henry E. Hudson
<fcgg/Q
Case 3:10-cv-00188-HEH
Document
15903/23/15
Filed 11/24/10
1of 2 425
4^
Case 3:13-cv-00662-JRS
Document
66 Filed
Page 12 ofPage
15 PageID#
v.
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS,
SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT
THIS MATTER is before the Court on a Motion for Summary Judgment and
Warrant for Arrest, submitted on November 15,2010 byamicus curiae W. Spencer
Connerat, III. Upon due consideration, Mr. Connerat is DENIED leave to file this
Motion and Warrant for Arrest, as well as any further filings in this action.
This Court's Order ofJune 3,2010 (Dk. No. 23) set forth an October 4,2010
deadline to file amicus curiae briefs. Mr. Connerat was granted leave to file, and did file,
such a briefon September 17,2010. However, Mr. Connerat was not granted leave to
further participate in this action beyond October4,2010. As such, Mr. Connerat is
denied leave to file anything further in this action.
: Qof \ A
Case 3:10-cv-00188-HEH
Document
15903/23/15
Filed 11/24/10
2of 2 426
foe*.
Case 3:13-cv-00662-JRS
Document
66 Filed
Page 13 ofPage
15 PageID#
The Clerk is directed to lodge the aforementioned document in the Clerk's office
The Clerk is directed to send acopy ofthis Order to W. Spencer Connerat, III by
U.S. mail, and to all counsel of record.
It is SO ORDERED.
tr
/s/
Henry E. Hudson
Date:
fa%* **/
Richmond, VA
\ of )Q
Asp-. \<f>ofi<P
APPROPRIATIONS
,...,,,.
fcousc of &cprcscntatiucs
aStoslnngtoii, BC 20513-0010
vvr;,u'
<
, o, .
;.5,:;!
s: ft t-M:,t.i>M,.,.;;. ,-.?v(.m-?m:;i;
;;^.'Vi"---
March 9, 2011
Dear Spencer:
Thank you for letting me know of your concerns regarding President Barnck Obama's eligibility
to become President of the United States based on his parents citizenship status.
Because of your interest in this regard, you will be pleased to learn of H.R. 1503, a measure that
would have amended the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require the principal
campaign committee of a candidate for electionto the office of President to include with the
committee's statement of organization acopy of the candidate's birth certificate, together with
such other documentation as may be necessary to establish that the candidate meets the
qualifications for eligibility to the Office of President.
Unfortunately, the Congress adjourned without completing action on H.R. 1503. As aresult, this
particular measure will have to be reintroduced sometime during the 112th Congress, which has
already convened. In the meantime, please know that I will keep your concerns about the
citizenship status of President Obama in mind.
Again, thank you for taking the time to contact me regarding this matter of mutual concern. It is
my hope that you will continue to keep me apprised of your interest in legislative issues
important to you. With best wishes and personal regards, I am
Very truly yours,
:. W. Bj
Member of Congress
CWY: vw
"Ifand when asecond rebuke ofthis Citizen's humble request^ manifested, then Ishall seek to record atrue and correct citpy^f
such tacit admission ofineligibility to the Office ofPresident ofthe
United States ofAmerica in the Pinellas County Courthouse."
RE: 522009SC005522XXSCSC
FiledMarchl8,2010
~_
//"
/? /)
J-(j)
^" ^ - ^
4^
MAR 23%
>A Q^r*.;
j,
'fa
to^tiSfcir'
\\\\xV"i
y' "
l&plftyxierir-
.->>