Professional Documents
Culture Documents
10
In a study on the effects of stress on illness, a researcher tallied the
number of colds people contracted during a 6-month period as a function
of the amount of stress they reported during that same time period. There
were three stress levels: minimal, moderate, and high stress. The sum of
squares appear in the ANOVA summary table below. The mean for each
condition and the number of participants per condition are also noted.
Source
Between
groups
Within
groups
Total
Stress Level
Minimal
Moderate
High
df
SS
22.167
MS
14.750
36.917
Mean
3
4
6
n
4
4
4
a.
b.
c.
d.
ANSWER NO. 10
a. Complete the ANOVA summary table.
Source
df
k-1
Between
groups
SS
MS
22.167
11.08
6.79
14.750
1.63
31=2
Nk
Within
groups
12 - 3 = 9
N1
Total
36.917
12 1 = 11
dfw = 12 3
=2
dft = 12 - 1
=9
= 11
MSBetween =
MS Within =
SSBetween
df Between
SSWithin
df Within
22.167
2
14.75
9
= 11.08
= 1.63
2
Figure 1
Rejecte
d
4.26
Fcv
6.79
Fobt
0.05
= Q( k, dfw )
3.95
3.95
=
1.63
4
0.4 075
MS w
n
HSD0.01 =
Q (k, df within )
HSD0.01 =
Q ( 3,9
MS within
n
1.63
4
5.43
5.43 0.4075
5.43 0.638
3.95 0.63 8
MS within
n
2.52
d. What conclusions can be drawn from the F-ratio and the post hoc
comparisons?
0.60 100
60
Figure 1
7
6
5
4
Amount of Stress
3
2
1
0
Minimal
Moderate
High
Stress Level
QUESTION NO. 12
A researcher conducted an experiment on the effect of a new drug on
depression. The researcher had a control group that received nothing, a
placebo group, and an experimental group that received the drug. A
depression inventory that provided a measure of depression on a 50-point
scale was used (50 indicates that an individual is very high on the
depression variable). The ANOVA summary table appears below, alon with
the mean depression score for each condition.
Source
Between
df
SS
1202.313
groups
Within
2118.00
groups
Total
3320.313
Drug Condition
Control
Placebo
Drug
Mean
36.26
33.33
24.13
MS
n
15
15
15
a.
b.
c.
d.
ANSWER NO. 12
a. Complete the ANOVA summary table.
Source
df
(k1)
Between
groups
SS
MS
1202.313
601.15
11.92
2118.00
50.42
3 -1 = 2
(Nk)
Within
groups
45 3 = 42
(N1)
Total
3320.313
45 1 = 44
Drug Condition
Control
Placebo
Drug
Mean
36.26
33.33
24.13
MS Between =
MS Within =
F=
SSBetween
df between
SSWithin
df Within
MSBettween 601.15
=
MSWithin
50.42
1202.313
2
2118.00
42
n
15
15
15
= 601.15
= 50.42
= 11.92
Figure 2
Rejecte
d
3.23
Fcv
11.92
Fobt
HSD0.05
HSD0.05 =
=
=
=
=
Q (k , df within )
MS within
n
MS within
Q ( 3,42
n
3.44
50.42
15
HSD0.01
HSD0.01 =
Q (k , df within )
Q ( 3,42
MS within
n
MSwithin
n
50.42
15
4.37
4.37 3.36
4.37 1.83
8.0
3.44 3.36
3.44 1.83
6.30
d. What conclusions can be drawn from the F-ratio and the post hoc
comparisons?
The amount of effect of a new drug had significant effect on
depression. Specifically, experimental group that received the
drug significant higher effect on depression more the those control
group and placebo group.
SSBetween
SSTotal
1202.31
3320.31
0.36
0.36 100
36
The effect size is 36%, thus knowing the drug control to which
participants were designed can explain 36% of the variability in
depressions.
Figure 2
40
Depression
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Control
Placebo
"
"
Drug Condition
QUESTION NO. 14
A researcher has been hired by a pizzeria to determine which type of crust
customers prefer. The restaurant offers three type of crust: hand-tossed,
thick, and thin. Following are the mean number of 1-inch pieces of pizza
eaten for each condition from 10 participants who had the opportunity to
eat as many pieces with each type of crust as they desired. The ANOVA
summary table also follows.
Source
Participant
df
SS
2.75
Between
180.05
Error
21.65
Total
204.45
Crust Type
Hand-tossed
MS
df
SS
2.73
n
10
Thick
4.20
10
Thin
8.50
10
a.
b.
c.
d.
ANSWER NO. 14
df
n1
SS
2.75
MS
0.30
180.05
90.02
75.01
21.65
1.20
10 1 = 9
Between
groups
k1
31=2
Error groups
(k-1)(n-1) =
18
(2)(9) = 18
Total
N1
204.45
30 1 = 29
Mencari nilai (df)
10
dfb = 3 1
dfe
dft = 30 1
=2
2 - 18
= 29
=29
= 29
= 18
=9
SSParticipant 2.75
=
=0.30
df Participant
9
MS Between =
MSError =
SSBetween
df between
SSError
df Error
180.05
2
21.65
18
= 90.02
= 1.20
HSD0.01
3.55
Fcv
HSD0.01 =
75.01
Q (k, df within )
Q ( 3,18
Fobt
MS within
n
1. 2
10
4.70
4.70 0.12
4. 7 0 0.34
1.60
MS within
n
11
Rejecte
d
MS Error
Q ( 3,18
MS within
n
1.2
10
3.61
3.61 0.12
3.61 0.34
1.23
d. What conclusions can be drawn from the F-ratio and the post hoc
comparisons?
The amount of the crust type had significant effect on pizzeria to
determine. Specifically, thin group significant higher more than thick
and hand-tossed group.
SSBetween
SSTotal
180.05
204.45
0.88
0.88 100
12
88
The effect size is 88%, thus knowing the crust type to which
participants were assigned can explain 88% of variability in pizzeria
to determine.
Figure 3
9
8
7
6
5
pizzeria to determine
4
3
2
1
0
Hand-tossed
Thick
Thin
Crust-Type
13