Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BOEING 737-200,
NEAR MAUI, HAWAII
APRIL 1988
8000 meter
03 Dynamic loads
Ir. Vincent Brugemann
1
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
Dynamic loads
2
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
3
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
1998: InterCityExpress
Munich to Hamburg
Cracks started at inner side of rim
Promoted by wear
4
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
Fatigue
Stress level
Frequency
5
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
Fatigue load
Variable amplitude
6
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
Fatigue loading
Variable amplitude
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
30
20
10
0
-10
T [C]
stress [MPa]
-20
-30
-40
0
10
15
20
stress [MPa]
25
30
t [C]
35
40
time [s]
7
Fatigue load
Constant amplitude
Parameters:
Waveform (block, sine)
Frequency
Stresses (2 required)
Maximum
Minimum
Amplitude
Mean
Stress ratio:
min
R=
max
8
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
Fatigue load
Constant amplitude
Whler curve (S-N curve)
average stress
sigmam
Initiation of cracks
We assume that there are no cracks present if we can not detect
them
Crack growth
Material property
10
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
11
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
first cycle
second cycle
12
Fatigue
Electron micrograph of
fatigue fracture surface
13
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
Fatigue
~2mm
14
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
Dynamic loads
15
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
Impact
Birds
Missiles / Other airplanes
Runway debris
Hail stones
Parts of aircraft
Tools
16
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
17
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
18
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
19
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
20
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
Runway debris
Impact process
strain rate
[s-1]
<10
10-103
103-104
105-106
106-107
>12000
>107
22
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
23
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
ultimate
MPa
E-modulus
MPa
ultimate
%
Ufracture
10-3 J/mm
1400
1700
1500
450
1230
62500
36500
150000
72000
65600
2.3
4.6
1.0
12
5.1
16.1
39.1
7.5
56
37.8
24
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
delaminations
plugging
25
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
Impact testing
Charpy test
Izod test
Drop tower (~10 m/s)
Air gun (~100 m/s or higher)
Structures:
Drop tower or air gun
Determination of BVID
26
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
Impact testing
Charpy and Izod test methods
27
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
28
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
Air Gun
Maximum speed about 100m/s
Air guns can reach higher speeds (up to hypervelocity)
29
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
Dynamic loads
30
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
Stress concentrations
Due to a crack
Governed by K
Stress intensity
31
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
Stress concentrations
W
nom = W-d S
peak
Kt =
nom
nom
peak
P
33
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
Stress concentration
Elliptical hole:
At point A: Kt = 1 +2a/b
At point B: Kt = -1
Question
Kt = 1 +2a/b
Oval
hole
h=3w
Round
hole
Oval
hole
3h=w
d/3
3d
d
A
Kt=3
Kt=1+2d/3d=5/3
Kt=1+2*3d/d=7
35
Question
Kt = 1 +2a/b
36
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
Stress intensity
K = Y a
Stress intensity (K) depends on:
Crack geometry (Y)
crack length (a)
nominal stress ()
37
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
K = Y a
38
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
K = Y a
When K reaches the critical value
Fracture toughness (KIc) is a material property
K Ic
Y a cr
1 K Ic
or a cr =
Y
cr =
K Ic
Y a
39
Dynamic loads
40
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
Impact damage
Metals
At low impact energy: dent
At high impact energy: dent in combination with cracks (when
stress > ultimate on side opposite impact-side)
With thick plate: plugging
Damage can be detected easily
41
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
Impact damage
Composites
Composites are sensitive for impact damage because of:
relatively low interlaminar strength
relatively brittle matrix and fibers
Impact damage
Low energy, Delaminations most on the side opposite the impact-side
Higher energy, Delaminations, and fiber fracture due to the high
bending stresses
43
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
Composites: BVID
44
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
Question
Answers:
1) Low speed: tool drop, airport collisions
High speed: bird impact, ballistic, engine explosion
2) The speed range governs the type of deformation
Low speed: Elastic deformation dominates
High speed: Energy dissipation by plastic deformation and fracture
45
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
Regulations
Development of concepts
Damage Tolerance
Fail safe
Safe Life
46
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
47
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
Safe Life
?
Fail safe
Damage Tolerance
48
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
Damage tolerance
Damage resistance:
Ability to withstand the formation of damage
Damage tolerance:
Effect of damage on the function of the structure
Depends on properties of the structure & of the materials
Residual strength:
Strength of damaged structure
49
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
Summary
Fatigue
Three stages: Initiation, crack growth, failure
Occurs below the yield limit due to micro plasticity
Impact
Deformation process during collision
Effect on structure is dependant on kinetic energy of bodies
50
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering
51
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering