Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Compiled By
NAME
GROUP : D
When a word of phrase picks up its meaning from same other piece of language nearby,
the relationship between the two is called anaphora. A word which gets its meaning in
this way is anaphor, and the piece of language which gives the anaphor its meaning is its
antecedent. In the antecedent of she is that baby girl over that.
Example illustrates a kind of pragmatic anaphora called discourse anaphora. Discourse
anaphora occurs when the anaphor and antecedent are in different sentences. It only
works with certain antecedent. While the antecedent in allow discourse anaphora, do not :
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
The first three sentences are acceptable because the antecedents in these cases provide a
reference for the anaphor she. In contrast, no baby girl and most baby girls and dont
provide a reference for she, since they are quantifiers and this is why anphora doesnt
work in these examples.
Presupposition
The sentence John stopped crying at noon only makes sense if it is assumed T John was
crying just before noon. If I say this to you, and you know that John had not been crying
at all, you would feel that what I say is out of place or that youd been misled. We say
that sentence John stopped crying at noon presupposes that John was crying just before
noon. Many words, phrases, and structures create presuppositions. Here are some
examples of sentences followed by their presuppositions ( in parentheses) :
a. Each of the boys in the room is nice. ( there are some boys in the room.)
b. That pig is fat. ( That is a pig)
In television shows about lawyers add detectives, presupposition is often turned to the
benefit of crafty investigator. Suppose a detective suspects X of committing a murder in
New Jersey, but has no clear evidence that X has traveled there. The detective might
casually ask how was your trip to New Jersey? this sentence presupposes that the
suspect has been there, and so any answer at all with provide the crucial evidence that X
has recently been to New Jersey.
Implicature
The idea that meaning is based in the intentions of speakers is most clearly revealed in
H.P.Grices theory of conversational implicature (Grice 1957, 1975). Very often, when
someone says something, he or she doesnt mean exactly what the words literally mean.
That is, the (speakers) meaning differs from the (semantic) meaning. For example, the
semantic meaning of theres a bear sneaking up behind you! doesnt involve the
concepts of warning : it just report the fact. Grice explained how speakers meaning can
be determined in such cases by positing a cooperative Principle that all speakers anf
hearers assume when speaking to each other :
Cooperative Principle : speakers meaning can be calculated on the basis of
semantic meaning and the assumption that speakers are behaving rationally and
cooperatively.
Grice broke this general principle into four conversational maxims to explain what
rationallity and cooperativeness are :
The maxim of Quality: make your contribution one that is true rather than false.
The maxim of Quantity : provide the information that is required for the purposes
of the conversation, but no more.
The maxim of Relevance : make your contributions relevant.
The maxim of Manner : be clear and orderly in your talk.
People follow the four maxims when they talk, and this helps us figure out what they
mean. Consider (36), for example :
(36) There are three students in the class : Marry, Bob, and Jill.
A: which students passed the exam?
B: Marry and Bob.
In this conversation, in addition to concluding that Marry and Bob passed the exam, A is
likely to infer that Jill didnt pass the exam, but B knows that A would figure this way,
and so said Marry and Bob with the understanding that A would conclude that Jill
didnt pass. In this way, the idea that Jill didnt pass becomes part of the speakers
meaning of Bs utterance. That is, B uses the Cooperative Principle and maxims to
implicate that Jill didnt pass.
(12) Elvis Presley made a peanut butter sandwich and sat down beside the pool.
This sentence seems to mean that Elvis made the peanut butter sandwich before going to
the pool. This before meaning is not part of the semantic meaning of and (as given by
truth conditions); it is an implicature. According to Grices maxim of Manner, we should
present information in an orderly way, and in most cases that includes mentioning events
in the speakers means to say that Elvis made the sandwich before sitting down by the
pool.
Speech acts
Another important figure in the development of pragmatics is John Austin. He pointed
out that when people use language, they are performing a kind of action. He called these
actions Speech acts. Its easy to see the act nature of language when a minister says, i
now pronounce you husband and wife in a wedding ceremony. Based on this sentence
being said by an appropriate person, the enggaged couple becomes a married couple.
Ex :
a. I promise to visit tommorrow.
b. She promised to visit tommorrow.
Example a is known as performative, while example in b is known as constative.
The disticntion between performative and constative may not be as important as the idea
taht all sentences can be used to perform actions of various sorts.
In tryng to understand the various types of acts that sentence may perform, Austin
proposed three levels of speech art :
1. Locutionary acts : grammar internal actions like articulating a certain sound, using
a certain morpheme, referring to a particular person. ( These are the actswhich
fall under phonetics, phonology, morphology, syntax and semantics. They are
usually not of much interest to people studyng pragmatics.
2. Illocutionary acts : actions of communication like assrting a fact, asking a
question, requesting an action, making a promise, or giving a warning.
3. Perlocutionary acts : actions which go beyond communication, like annoying,
frightening, or tricking someone by what you tell them.
For example :
Suppose speaker a says to hearer b
There is a bear sneaking up behind you!
At the locutionary level, a utters the word there and refers to the addresee with the
word
you
(
among
many
other
locutionary
acts
)
At the illocutionary level, A asserts a fact ( that there is a bear sneaking up behind B )
and
warns
B
that
he
or
she
is
in
danger.
At the perlocutionary level, A frightens B and causes B to run away.
Pragmatics summary
Pragmatics is fundamental about how the context of use contributes to meaning, both
semantic meaning and speakers meaning. The core topics of pragmatics are
indexicality, presupposition, implicature, and speech acts.