Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fig. 2
The right side of Fig. 2 shows that, on a field scale, sweep efficiency is affec
ted by viscous fingering and solvent channeling through high-permeability streak
s. Gravity override can sometimes occur because solvent is usually less dense th
an the oil it is displacing.[18][19] When vertical communication is high, solven
t tends to gravity segregate to the top of a reservoir unit and sweep only the u
pper part of that zone. Although gravity override can be a problem in reservoirs
having good vertical communication (such as Judy Creek[20] and Prudhoe Bay[21])
, it is not usually a serious problem for west Texas carbonates,[22] which tend
to be more stratified and have poor vertical communication.
Sweep efficiency on the field scale is usually the single most important factor
affecting performance of a miscible flood. Sweep efficiency can be increased to
some extent by reducing well spacing, increasing injection rate, reconfiguring w
ell patterns, increasing solvent-bank sizes, and modifying the ratio of injected
water to injected solvent (WAG ratio).
Fig. 3 presents part of a considerable body of laboratory evidence that solvent
effectively displaces oil from contacted regions of the reservoir. The graph of
oil recovery as a function of total pore volumes of fluid injected shows the res
ults of a laboratory coreflood conducted at conditions corresponding to the Shar
on Ridge reservoir in west Texas. The waterflood recovered approximately 40% OOI
P. A CO2 flood that followed increased oil recovery to approximately 80% OOIP, d
emonstrating that CO2 can displace a large portion of the residual oil remaining
after a waterflood. Sorm was 10%; the WAG ratio for the miscible flood was 1.
Fig. 3
The schematics at the bottom of Fig. 3 illustrate the pore-level recovery mechan
isms discussed earlier (Fig. 2). At the end of the waterflood, residual oil is a
discontinuous phase that occupies approximately 40% of the pore space. Early in
the miscible flood [3.0 to 3.5 total pore volumes (PV) injected], some of this
oil has been miscibly displaced by solvent from the higher-permeability flow pat
h (on the pore scale). However, some oil also has been initially bypassed by sol
vent. Note that this bypassing at the pore level is much different from solvent
bypassing, which can occur at the field scale because of larger-scale reservoir
heterogeneities. As depicted in the schematic corresponding to late in the flood
(to 7.0 total PV injected), part of this locally bypassed oil is subsequently r
ecovered by extraction and swelling that takes place as solvent continues to flo
w past the bypassed oil. In this case, approximately 30% of the total amount of
oil recovered by the CO2 flood was recovered by extraction and swelling.
Determining miscibility
True miscible displacement implies that injected and displaced phases mix in all
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
[23]).
Fig. 6
Effect of enrichment on recovery in a reservoir study. After Jerauld (sol
id lines are the reference model, and dashed lines are the scaleup model).[24]
Overall industry experience
Fig. 7 shows how incremental ultimate recovery increased with total solvent slug
size for a few projects for which these data were available in the literature.
The interpretations given in this figure are the author s and are not necessarily
those of the project operators. Many of the projects represented in this figure
are ongoing, and the ultimate incremental recovery is an estimate.
Fig. 7
Fig. 8 World incremental oil production caused by gas injection (adapted from bi
ennial reports, Oil & Gas J.).
Miscible injection has been applied successfully in many reservoirs. Field examp
les are presented to illustrate how CO2, enriched hydrocarbons, and N2 solvents
have been used to increase oil recoveries significantly. The resulting experienc
e with miscible projects has made it possible to reliably predict the economic v
iability of new projects in other reservoirs. Advances incompositional simulatio
n enhance the ability to assess miscible flooding and improve its effectiveness.
References
1.? 1.0 1.1 Healy, R.N., Holstein, E.D., and Batycky, J.P. 1994. Status of Misci
ble Flooding Technology. Proc., 14th World Petroleum Congress, Stavanger, 29 May 1
June. 407 416. ? 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 Hadlow, R.E. 1992. Update of Industry
2.? 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 Hadlow, R.E. 1992. Update of Industry Experience Wit
h CO2 Injection. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
, Washington, D.C., 4-7 October 1992. SPE-24928-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/24
928-MS.
3.? Brock, W.R. and Bryan, L.A. 1989. Summary Results of CO2 EOR Field Tests, 19
72-1987. Presented at the Low Permeability Reservoirs Symposium, Denver, 6-8 Mar
ch. SPE 18977. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/18977-MS.
4.? Martin, W.E. 1982. The Wizard Lake D-3A Pool Miscible Flood. Presented at th
e International Petroleum Exhibition and Technical Symposium, Beijing, China, 17
-24 March 1982. SPE-10026-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/10026-MS.
5.? Backmeyer, L.A., Guise, D.R., MacDonell, P.E. et al. 1984. The Tertiary Exte
nsion of the Wizard Lake D-3A Pool Miscible Flood. Presented at the SPE Annual T
echnical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, 16-19 September 1984. SPE-13
271-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/13271-MS.
6.? Da Sle, W.J. and Guo, D.S. 1990. Assessment of a Vertical Hydrocarbon Miscib
le Flood in the Westpem Nisku D Reef. SPE Res Eng 5 (2): 147 154. SPE-17354-PA. ht
tp://dx.doi.org/10.2118/17354-PA.
7.? Johnston, J.R. 1988. Weeks Island Gravity Stable CO2 Pilot. Presented at the
SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 17 20 April. SPE 17351. http://dx
.doi.org/10.2118/17351-MS.
8.? Tiffin, D.L. and Jr., V.J.K. 1988. Mechanistic Study of Gravity-Assisted CO2
Flooding. SPE Res Eng 3 (2): 524-532. SPE-14895-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/1
4895-PA.
9.? Shyeh-Yung, J.-G.J. 1991. Mechanisms of Miscible Oil Recovery: Effects of Pr
essure on Miscible and Near-Miscible Displacements of Oil by Carbon Dioxide. Pre
sented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, 6-9
October 1991. SPE-22651-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/22651-MS.
10.? Stern, D. 1991. Mechanisms of Miscible Oil Recovery: Effects of Pore-Level
Fluid Distribution. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibit
ion, Dallas, Texas, 6-9 October 1991. SPE-22652-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/22
652-MS.
11.? Koch, H.A. and Hutchinson, C.A. Jr. 1958. Miscible Displacements of Reservo
ir Oil Using Flue Gas. Trans., AIME 213: 7.
12.? Clark, N.J., Shearin, H.M., Schultz, W.P. et al. 1958. Miscible Drive Its The
ory and Application. J Pet Technol 10 (6): 11 20. SPE-1036-G. http://dx.doi.org/10
.2118/1036-G.
13.? Hutchinson, C.A. and Braun, P.H. 1961. Phase relations of miscible displace
ment in oil recovery. AIChE J. 7 (1): 64-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aic.69007
0117.
14.? Benham, A.L., Dowden, W.E., and Kunzman, W.J. 1960. Miscible Fluid Displace
ment Prediction of Miscibility. Trans., AIME 219: 229.
15.? Wu, R.S., Batycky, J.P., Harker, B. et al. 1986. Enriched Gas Displacement:
Design Of Solvent Compositions. J Can Pet Technol 25 (3). PETSOC-86-03-06. http
://dx.doi.org/10.2118/86-03-06.
16.? Zick, A.A. 1986. A Combined Condensing/Vaporizing Mechanism in the Displace
ment of Oil by Enriched Gases. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference
and Exhibition, New Orleans, 5 8 October. SPE-15493-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/
15493-MS.
17.? Stone, H.L. 1982. Vertical Conformance in an Alternating Water-Miscible Gas
Flood. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orl
eans, Louisiana, 26 29 September. SPE-11130-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/11130-MS
.
18.? Jenkins, M.K. 1984. An Analytical Model for Water/Gas Miscible Displacement
s. Presented at the SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 15 1
8 April. SPE-12632-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/12632-MS.
19.? Pritchard, D.W.L., Georgi, D.T., Hemingson, P. et al. 1990. Reservoir Surve
illance Impacts Management of the Judy Creek Hydrocarbon Miscible Flood. Present
ed at the SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 22 25 April. S
PE-20228-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/20228-MS.
20.? Dawson, A.G., Jackson, D.D., and Buskirk, D.L. 1989. Impact of Solvent Inje
ction Strategy and Reservoir Description on Hydrocarbon Miscible EOR for the Pru
dhoe Bay Unit, Alaska. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhi
bition, San Antonio, Texas, 8-11 October 1989. SPE-19657-MS. http://dx.doi.org/1
0.2118/19657-MS.
21.? Magruder, J.B., Stiles, L.H., and Yelverton, T.D. 1990. Review of the Means
San Andres Unit CO2 Tertiary Project. J Pet Technol 42 (5): 638 644. SPE-17349-PA
. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/17349-PA.
22.? Moritis, G. 1992. EOR Increases 24% Worldwide; Claims 10% of U.S. Productio
n. Oil & Gas J. (20 April): 51.
23.? 23.0 23.1 23.2 Chang, H.L., Sing Lo, T., Ring, W.W. et al. 1993. The Effect
s of Injectant-Enrichment Level on Oil Recovery in Horizontal, Gravity-Tongue-Do
minated Enriched-Gas Drives. Presented at the SPE Western Regional Meeting, Anch
orage, Alaska, 26-28 May 1993. SPE-26084-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/26084-MS
24.? 24.0 24.1 Jerauld, G.R. 1998. A Case Study in Scaleup for Multicontact Misc
ible Hydrocarbon Gas Injection. SPE Res Eval & Eng 1 (6): 575 582. SPE-53006-PA. h
ttp://dx.doi.org/10.2118/53006-PA
Noteworthy papers in OnePetro
Use this section to list papers in OnePetro that a reader who wants to learn mor
e should definitely read
External links
Use this section to provide links to relevant material on websites other than Pe
troWiki and OnePetro
See also
Designing a miscible flood
Phase diagrams of miscible processes
Equations of state for miscible processes
Compositional simulation of miscible processes
PEH:Miscible_Processes
Category: 5.4.9 Miscible methods
.
Published by
Published by the Society of Petroleum Engineers.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Read
Main page
Random page
Interaction
Toolbox
ApacheCorp
Founding Sponsor
Gold Sponsor
AIME
Gold Sponsor
Pioneer Natural Resources
Silver Sponsor
.
12
..
Now Hiring
Streamsim Technologies
Alloy Metals and Tubes
Powered by MediaWiki
This page was last modified on 12 June 2015, at 10:49.
Privacy policy
About
Disclaimer
Help
Copyright 2012-2015, Society of Petroleum Engineers
.
Public Domain
.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------