Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DURING
the operation of m o d e r n n u c l e a r r e a c t o r
plants, s t r i n g e n t p r e s s u r e - t e m p e r a t u r e l i m i t a t i o n s for
h e a t - u p and cooldown of the r e a c t o r coolant s y s t e m
a r e i m p o s e d to provide adequate safety m a r g i n s a g a i n s t
the p o s s i b i l i t y of f a i l u r e of the f e r r i t i c p r e s s u r e v e s s e l
m a t e r i a l s . B e c a u s e of this c o n c e r n over p o s s i b l e s u b c r i t i c a l or c r i t i c a l f r a c t u r e s in the r e a c t o r v e s s e l , a
l a r g e r e s e a r c h effort over the last decade has b e e n
d i r e c t e d at fully c h a r a c t e r i z i n g the toughness of n u c l e a r
p r e s s u r e v e s s e l s t e e l s as a function of alloy c o m p o s i tion, r e s i d u a l e l e m e n t content, r e a c t o r operating t e m p e r a t u r e , and s t r a i n - r a t e in both u n i r r a d i a t e d and
neutron irradiated material. 1
N u c l e a r p r e s s u r e v e s s e l s t e e l s , such as SA533B-1,
undergo a c l a s s i c a l f r a c t u r e mode t r a n s i t i o n f r o m low
e n e r g y b r i t t l e f r a c t u r e s at low t e m p e r a t u r e s (lower
shelf) to high e n e r g y ductile f r a c t u r e s at higher t e m p e r a t u r e s (upper shelf), as shown by the C h a r p y Vnotch i m p a c t toughness data in F i g . 1.2 T h i s figure
also i n d i c a t e s the m a r k e d d e g r a d a t i o n in toughness
t h r o u g h a shift of the i m p a c t c u r v e to higher t e m p e r a t u r e s f r o m n e u t r o n i r r a d i a t i o n . F r a c t o g r a p h i c obs e r v a t i o n s 3 in such low s t r e n g t h s t e e l s have shown that,
m i c r o s c o p i c a l l y , low t e m p e r a t u r e (lower shelf) f r a c t u r e s o c c u r by a t r a n s g r a n u l a r cleavage m e c h a n i s m
along low e n e r g y cleavage p l a n e s , w h e r e a s at the
upper shelf, f r a c t u r e o c c u r s by a m e c h a n i s m of m i c r o void c o a l e s c e n c e involving the initiation, growth and
c o a l e s c e n c e of s m a l l voids f o r m e d at i n c l u s i o n s , and
second phase p a r t i c l e s . R e c e n t l y a t t e m p t s have b e e n
made to r e l a t e these m i c r o s c o p i c f a i l u r e modes to the
local m e c h a n i c a l c r i t e r i a g o v e r n i n g f r a c t u r e , with the
objective of d e s c r i b i n g m a c r o s c o p i c f r a c t u r e toughness
b e h a v i o r . F a i l u r e at the lower shelf has b e e n modeled
R. O. RITCHIE is Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical
Engineering,Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge,
MA 02139. W. L. SERVER and R. A. WULLAERTare Vice President and President, respectively, Fracture Control Corporation,
Goleta, CA 93017.
Manuscript submitted March 5, 1979.
METALLURGICALTRANSACTIONSA
as s l i p - i n i t i a t e d cleavage f r a c t u r e u s i n g the c r i t i c a l
s t r e s s c r i t e r i o n proposed by Ritchie, Knott, and Rice
(RKR). 4 F a i l u r e at the upper shelf has been modeled
as m i c r o v o i d c o a l e s c e n c e using a s t r e s s modified
s t r a i n c r i t e r i o n o r i g i n a l l y p r o p o s e d by M c C l i n t o c k 5
and adapted by M a c K e n z i e and coworkers.6 S u c c e s s ful a p p l i c a t i o n of such models r e q u i r e s a d e t e r m i n a t i o n
of c r i t i c a l f r a c t u r e s t r e s s and s t r a i n v a l u e s f r o m
notched bend and t e n s i l e t e s t s and a knowledge of p r e cise a n a l y s e s for the e l a s t i c - p l a s t i c s t r e s s and s t r a i n
d i s t r i b u t i o n s ahead of s h a r p c r a c k s , t o g e t h e r with an
e v a l u a t i o n of the m i c r o s t r u c t u r a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t s i z e scales governing fracture.
The p r e s e n t s t u d i e s were i n s t i g a t e d to d e t e r m i n e the
f e a s i b i l i t y of applying such s i m p l e models to p r e d i c t
the v a r i a t i o n of both lower and upper shelf static and
d y n a m i c f r a c t u r e toughness with t e m p e r a t u r e and
s t r a i n - r a t e for two f e r r i t i c alloy s t e e l s utilized in the
c o n s t r u c t i o n of n u c l e a r p r e s s u r e v e s s e l s , n a m e l y
SA533B-1 and SA302B. The work c o n s t i t u t e s an ext e n s i o n of s t u d i e s by P a r k s 7 who showed the a p p l i c a b i l ity of the RKR model to d e s c r i b e lower shelf static
t o u g h n e s s in SA533B-1. F u r t h e r , p r o c e d u r e s a r e
developed for d e t e r m i n i n g the influence of i n c r e a s i n g
n e u t r o n fluence on toughness in i r r a d i a t e d s t e e l , and
p r e d i c t i o n s a r e d e r i v e d for lower shelf f r a c t u r e toughn e s s in i r r a d i a t e d SA533B-1.
FRACTURE MODELS
C r i t i c a l S t r e s s Model
for Lower Shelf T o u g h n e s s
E a r l y s t u d i e s of s l i p - i n i t i a t e d low t e m p e r a t u r e
cleavage f r a c t u r e for Mode I loading in mild s t e e l
indicated that cleavage c r a c k s propagate in an u n s t a b l e
m a n n e r when the m a x i m u m p r i n c i p a l (tensile) s t r e s s
(~yy) ahead of a s t r e s s c o n c e n t r a t o r exceeds a c r i t i c a l
value (crT), which is r e l a t i v e l y independent of both t e m p e r a t u r e and s t r a i n - r a t e , s'9 T h i s c r i t i c a l s t r e s s c r i t e r i o n for cleavage f r a c t u r e p r e d i c t s f a i l u r e to be
ISSN 0360-2133179/1011-1557500.75/0
9 1979AMERICANSOCIETYFOR METALSAND
THE METALLURGICALSOCIETYOF AIME
TEMPERATURE (~
~00
300
-200
200
400
600
I
SA533B WELD
200
UNIRRADIATED
(~)
IRRADIATED AT 2B8~
160
~o
80
100
o- c~N-t)l~a
[31
where,
0
:s(N)
-150
150
300
TEMPERATURE (~
{j~I/(N+I)
[ ,oS J
1558-VOLUME
[aa]
*It should be noted that Eq. [3] is presetated as one representation of the
analytical form of the RKR model, since it is based solely on the HRR asymptotic crack tip singularity, and correspondingly does not reflect the refinements
in the stress distribution derived from more recent finite element solutions, t%13
or the near-tip alterations due to crack tip blunting./4,is Application of the
model is thus best achieved by reference to these specific solutions.
E x p e r i m e n t a l d e t e r m i n a t i o n of c r i t i c a l f r a c t u r e
s t r e s s (a~) v a l u e s is a c h i e v e d by f r a c t u r i n g V - n o t c h e d
bend b a r s at low temperatures.4'9'17,2~'22 T r a d i t i o n a l l y
the v a l u e of o-~ has been c a l c u l a t e d f r o m s l i p - l i n e
field t h e o r y to d e t e r m i n e the m a x i m u m l o c a l t e n s i l e
s t r e s s tayy
" max,) at the notch r o o t at f a i l u r e . W h e r e f r a c t u r e loads a r e w e l l below g e n e r a l y i e l d , H i l l ' s e x p o n e n t i a l s p i r a l s l i p - l i n e s o l u t i o n has b e e n used, 21,22
n a m e ly:
max = 2hi1 + ln(1
o-yy
+ r~y/p)]
[4]
[5]
[1]
"-
]'<N+"
is the a m p l i t u d e of the s t r e s s s i n g u l a r i t y . T y p i c a l
v a l u e s of I, f(N), and/3 a s a function of h a r d e n i n g e x ponent a r e l i s t e d in T a b l e I.*
Fig. 1 - V a r i a t i o n o f C h a r p y V - n o t c h i m p a c t t o u g h n e s s w i t h t e m p e r a t u r e f o r u n i r r a d i a t e d ( u ) a n d i r r a d i a t e d (i) S A 5 3 3 t 3 - 1 , t a k e n f r o m
a weld in t h e beltline region o f t h e p r e s s u r e vessel in t h e Maine
Yankee Nuclear Reactor: .
o'y?;ao = S(N) \ ~ 1
[(1 -
L(K/ y)q
''<"+'>
[2]
Hardening Exponent N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
=3
=5
=9
= 13
= 25
= 49
= 99
f(N)
131
5.51
5.02
4.60
4.40
4.14
3.96
3.84
1.94
2.22
2.46
2.58
2.73
2.83
2.90
5.50
4.52
3.80
3.53
3.24
3.10
3.03
METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONSA
I:" .
x~ v -
15-2 D I A
3A - 1 0 N C T H R E A D
~p : f d~p = 2 1 n ao ,
a min
~/~
a rain
= 1/3 + in (2 + ~ - p
),
[7]
% : c , ;5
[8]
w h e r e cl is a c o n s t a n t d e t e r m i n e d f r o m F i g . 3, then at
i n i t i a t i o n of d u c t i l e f r a c t u r e , ~ = ~* at d i s t a n c e x
P
7
= l * when 5 = 5c. Klc v a l u e s m a y be r e l a t e d to the
c r i t i c a l c r a c k tip opening d i s p l a c e m e n t s (5c) using the
s m a l l s c a l e y i e l d i n g f o r m u l a t i o n : 30
6~ = o.~ K
~
Eay
METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS A
[9]
[101
~p
i n v o l v e s c o a l e s c e n c e by s h e a r l o c a l i z a t i o n b e t w e e n a
n u m b e r of v o i d s n u c l e a t e d a t t h e l a r g e s t p a r t i c l e s ,
v a l u e s of l* f o r s u c h f r a c t u r e a r e g e n e r a l l y f o u n d
t o b e s o m e s m a l l m u l t i p l e of t h e i n t e r p a r t i c l e s p a c ing.5~6~ 16~27~31
12.0
'rm/(r
5
INITIAL ~
SHARP r a ~
BLUNTED CRACK
rrm/tr
M A T E R I A L S AND E X P E R I M E N T A L
PROCEDURES
~1.0
]
0.5
1.0
1.5
]o5
2.0
25
x ,/5
Fig. 3-Distribution of plastic strain (~p) and stress state (o m/0) near
crack tip, from Rice and Johnson small scale yielding solution. L4
Chemistryin WeightPercent
Material
Heat Code
SA533B-1 (HSST
lbA
Plate 02)
SA302B (Surveillancecor- 4bA
relation heat)
Mn
Si
Ni
Cr
Mo
Cu
0.23
1.55
0.009
0.014
0.20
0.67
0.04
0.53
0.003
0.16
0.23
1.47
0.013
0.024
0.26
0.17
0.05
0.52
0.004
0.20
20 ~m
20 ~m
(a)
(b)
Fig. 4 Optical microstructures of (a) SA533B-1 (HSST plate 02) and (b) SA302B (Surveillance correlation heat) showing predominately tempered
bainitic structure.
Table III. Mechanical Properties of Nuclear Pressure Vessel Steels (T--L Orientation)
NDTT
Charpy V-Notch
Energy, UpperShelf
Material
Heat Code
Yield Stress,MPa
UTS, MPa
Elongation*,
Pet
SA533B-1
SA302B
lbA
4bA
481
465
642
625
25.4
25.2
-29
-18
137
60
METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS A
*It is not possible from optical microscopy to make a cle~ar distinction, but
certain studies on HSST Plate O1 of SA533B-1 claim that the blocky ferritic
areas are actually granular bainite since they contain evidence of carbide precipitation. 32
" "
Table IV. Measured V alues of Crotmal
Cleavage Fracture Stress
for Nuclear Pressure Vessel Steels.
(of)*
Material
Static, MPa
DynamicImpact, MPa
SA533B-1
SA302B
1830
1650
2000
1900
K i c ~- K j c
= ~ / g i c E / ( 1 - v2)
[11]
T In (108~L I03~
2
200t~160
~
4
I
6
]
8
I
10
I
12
I
14
I
16
I
-- 1200
-- 1000
120
%,
--
800
-.
~J 1~ .~"'-~l~
80
(ENGLISH UNITS)
(7v(T,~) = 4.55 103 [T In (108/~)1-0"431
"~'1~=~
J~
-/
x ;-;.~ .......
"++m )6...... =
m ~
/
........
,~
.,1,...r
"
-I
-~ 400
4O
200
0
6
10
12
14
16
18
,i
20
22
24
26
28
30
T In (108/~), 103~
METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONSA
63.5
12.
,,3
w84
ii~::
,~2
o 2s.Ao,,,s
38.1
Fig. 6 - S c h e m a t i c diagram of V - n o t c h e d f o u r - p o i n t b e n d s p e c i m e n for
m e a s u r e m e n t o f o; 9 All l e n g t h d i m e n s i o n s are in units of m m .
ROOM TEMPERATURE
Z~ SA533B-1
C) SA302B
1.2
1.0
E x p e r i m e n t a l D e t e r m i n a t i o n of C r i t i c a l F r a c t u r e
S t r e s s and S t r a i n (cry, ~])
C r i t i c a l f r a c t u r e s t r e s s (a~) v a l u e s for lower shelf
slip i n i t i a t e d cleavage in both u n i r r a d i a t e d SA533B-1
and SA302B were d e t e r m i n e d f r o m slow bend and
i m p a c t f o u r - p o i n t bend t e s t s on 45 deg V - n o t c h e d b a r s
(Fig. 6) b r o k e n at t e m p e r a t u r e s o f - 7 3 , - 129, and
-193~
where f a i l u r e o c c u r r e d c a t a s t r o p h i c a l l y by
u n s t a b l e c l e a v a g e well before g e n e r a l y i e l d i n g . Slow
b e n d t e s t s were p e r f o r m e d at an effective c r a c k tip
s t r a i n - r a t e of a p p r o x i m a t e l y 10 -4 s -1, and i m p a c t t e s t s
were p e r f o r m e d at ~ -~ 50 s -1. The n o m i n a l bending
s t r e s s at the onset of c a t a s t r o p h i c f a i l u r e was m e a s u r e d in each t e s t , and using the G r i f f i t h and Owen 25
finite e l e m e n t s t r e s s d i s t r i b u t i o n for this p a r t i c u l a r
g e o m e t r y of t e s t piece, the c r i t i c a l v a l u e s of the
, max
m a x i m u m p r i n c i p a l s t r e s s at the c r a c k tip tayy
= ~ ) were computed (Table IV).*
*Values of yield stress used in the computation were corrected for the particular crack tip strain-rates, as described above,
0.8
E
b
X
0.6
0.4
0.2
0:
1
0.2
I
0.4
I
0,6
I
0.8
I
1.0
~f
Fig. 7 - F a i l u r e i n i t i a t i o n curves for c h a n g m g stress state at r o o m
t e m p e r a t u r e (24~
1 5 6 2 - V O L U M E 10A, OCTOBER 1979
t
1.2
F r a c t u r e s t r a i n (~f) v a l u e s as a function of s t r e s s
state (am~-6) for upper shelf ductile f r a c t u r e in both
s t e e l s were d e t e r m i n e d f r o m c i r c u m f e r e n t i a l l y notched
t e n s i l e t e s t s at 24, 71, and 177~
Unnotched and
notched t e s t p i e c e s (Fig 9 2) with root r a d i i p of 1.27,
1.91, 2.54, 3.81, and 6.35 m m were loaded u n d e r
l o n g i t u d i n a l d i s p l a c e m e n t c o n t r o l , m o n i t o r e d with a n
a x i a l s t r a i n t r a n s d u c e r mounted a c r o s s the notch 9 I n
addition, a d i a m e t r a l s t r a i n t r a n s d u c e r was mounted
in the notch to c o n t i n u o u s l y m o n i t o r changes in the
m i n i m u m d i a m e t e r of the notched c r o s s - s e c t i o n 9
F a i l u r e i n i t i a t i o n was defined as the point when the
a v e r a g e axial s t r e s s (applied load divided by i n s t a n t a n e o u s c r o s s - s e c t i o n a l a r e a ) dropped s h a r p l y p r i o r
to final f a i l u r e . The f r a c t u r e s t r a i n (~f) was c o m puted a s the e q u i v a l e n t p l a s t i c s t r a i n (~p) at this
METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS A
P R E D I C T I O N OF UNIRRADIATED TOUGHNESS
Lower Shelf T o u g h n e s s
The t e m p e r a t u r e d e p e n d e n c e of s t a t i c f r a c t u r e
t o u g h n e s s (Klc) at the l o w e r s h e l f for u n i r r a d i a t e d
SA533B-1 s t e e l , b e t w e e n - 2 0 0 and 0~ is i l l u s t r a t e d
in F i g . 12, t o g e t h e r with c a l c u l a t e d v a l u e s , d e t e r m i n e d
f r o m the RKR c r i t i c a l c l e a v a g e s t r e s s m o d e l 4 f o r
c h a r a c t e r i s t i c d i s t a n c e s of 2, 3, and 4 p r i o r a u s t e n i t e
1.4
METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS A
/% SA533B-1
1.2
(D SA302B
1.0
E s t i m a t i o n of C h a r a c t e r i s t i c D i s t a n c e s (l*)
P r e c i s e d e t e r m i n a t i o n of the c r i t i c a l m i c r o s t r u c t u r a l
s i z e s c a l e for e i t h e r c l e a v a g e o r d u c t i l e f r a c t u r e d e m a n d s at l e a s t that the c o m p l e t e m i c r o m e c h a n i s m s of
f a i l u r e a r e fully u n d e r s t o o d . Since the l o c a l m e c h a n i s m s of c r i t i c a l f a i l u r e e v e n t s in t h e s e s t e e l s a r e not
known, it would be i m p o s s i b l e f r o m f i r s t p r i n c i p l e s to
d e t e r m i n e t h e s e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c d i s t a n c e s . In t h e i r
d e r i v a t i o n of the c r i t i c a l s t r e s s m o d e l f o r c l e a v a g e
f r a c t u r e , RKR 4 found b e s t a g r e e m e n t with e x p e r i m e n t a l
d a t a with a c h a r a c t e r i s t i c d i s t a n c e of two f e r r i t e g r a i n
d i a m e t e r s (l* = 2d = 120 gm) in m i l d s t e e l , but t h e r e
is no r e a l f u n d a m e n t a l p h y s i c a l s i g n i f i c a n c e for t h i s .
In fact, a s P a r k s 7 s t a t e s , " t h e d i m e n s i o n m u s t be
r e g a r d e d a s e s s e n t i a l l y an e m p i r i c a l l y obtained q u a n tity, though p r e s u m a b l y of r e l e v a n c e to m i c r o s t r u c t u r a l
a s p e c t s of f r a c t u r e i n i t i a t i o n . "
H o w e v e r , e x a m i n a t i o n of l o w e r s h e l f c l e a v a g e f r a c t u r e s in SA533B-1 and SA302B (Fig. 10) r e v e a l s that
c l e a v a g e f a c e t s a r e of the o r d e r of the p r i o r a u s t e n i t e
g r a i n s i z e r a t h e r than, s a y , the b a i n i t e p a c k e t s i z e .
F u r t h e r , it is not u n r e a s o n a b l e to p r e s u m e that the
c r i t i c a l f r a c t u r e event is e i t h e r the c r a c k i n g of a g r a i n
b o u n d a r y c a r b i d e o r the p r o p a g a t i o n of the m a t r i x
c r a c k t h r o u g h the next g r a i n b o u n d a r y , i.e., o c c u r r i n g
o v e r the f i r s t few p r i o r a u s t e n i t e g r a i n s f r o m the
c r a c k tip. A c c o r d i n g l y for l o w e r s h e l f t o u g h n e s s p r e dictions characteristic distances were chosen between
2 d and 4 d with d , the p r i o r a u s t e n i t e g r a i n s i z e , m e a s u r e d a s 25 and 33 ~ m for SA533B-1 and SA302B,
r e s p e c t i v e l y , c o n s i s t e n t with p r e v i o u s e s t i m a t e s by
P a r k s .7
At u p p e r s h e l f t e m p e r a t u r e s , the i n i t i a t i o n event for
d u c t i l e f r a c t u r e , w h e r e the d i s p l a c e m e n t s p r o d u c e d by
i n t e r n a l necking b e t w e e n p a r t i c l e s a r e c r i t i c a l , would
not be p o s s i b l e o v e r d i s t a n c e s s m a l l e r than p a r t i c l e
s p a c i n g . Since in the p r e s e n t s t e e l s it is the linkage by
s h e a r l o c a l i z a t i o n b e t w e e n l a r g e v o i d s , n u c l e a t e d at
i n c l u s i o n s , which d e s c r i b e s the i n i t i a t i o n of a c t u a l
d u c t i l e c r a c k growth, 3 a l o w e r bound e s t i m a t e of the
c h a r a c t e r i s t i c d i s t a n c e m u s t be the i n c l u s i o n s p a c i n g .
E x a m i n a t i o n of u p p e r s h e l f f r a c t u r e s in both s t e e l s
(Fig. 11) shows that the s p a c i n g b e t w e e n m a j o r v o i d s
on f r a c t u r e s u r f a c e s is r o u g h l y 50 /~m in SA533B-1
( c o n s i s t e n t with p r e v i o u s i n c l u s i o n d i s t r i b u t i o n
s t u d i e s 3) and 100 to 150 p m in SA302B.
J
160~ (71~
0.8
~
e
0.6
0.4
- -
0.2
I
0.2
I
0.4
I
0.6
I
0.8
I
1.0
I
1.2
gf
Fig. 8 - F a i l u r e initiation curves for changing stress state at 71 ~
1.4
350~ (177~
1.2
1.0
0.8
Z~ SA533B~l
C) SA302B
'4E
0.6
0.4
!
0.2
~o
I
0.2
I
0.4
I
0.6
I
0.8
I
1.0
1.2
~f
Fig. 9 - D u c t i l e failure initiation curves for changing stress state at
177~
20 #m
L20
(a)
(b)
Fig. 10-Transgranular cleavage fractures at lower shelf for (a) SASB3B-1 tested at - 7 8 ~
I
(a)
#mJ
50 #m
I
(b)
Fig. 1 1-Ductile fracture by mJcrovoid coalescence at upper shelf for (a) SA533B-I and (b) SA302B tested at 71~
TEMPERATURE, ~
-300
-200
-100
UNIRRADIATED
STATIC TOUGHNESS
,E
o
o
~ 1 10-2 s -1
100 1
r
--
s
o PRECRACKED CHARPY (T-L)
u,J
z
"1-
9 I-T C O M P A C T (T-L)
60 _
100
120
--R'"PRED,CT,ONS
9 ,,,,,,"'"~ -
80
9 ~ ' ~ o * --3
~
~J
J
o 9
/ l
=4d~ ,'~
v
w
Z
-r
60
. .
SA533B-1.
,,r
-._
40
40
;_
u.
20
20
NDTT
0
-200
-150
-100
-50
TEMPERATURE~
TEMPERATURE, ~F
-300
-200
-100
120
UNIRRADIATED
120
DYNAMIC TOUGHNESS
~5
100 s-I
o
100
80
1-T COMPACT
2-T COMPACT
3-T COMPACT
o
i
o
O 4-T COMPACT
60
8O
5o
w
z
RKR PREDICTIONS
4o ~
4o
20
20
NDTT
A
0
-200
t
-150
-100
-50
TEMPERATURE, ~
TRANSACTIONS
10A,
OCTOBER
1979-1565
TEMFERATURE,~F
-300
-200
-100
I -
0
I
120
120
OYNAMtC TOUGHNESS
100
~3
102s-1
o-f* = 2000 MPa (290 ksi)
100
= 25 ~m (1.0 10-6)
80
-r
P,
o'=3~
RKR PREDICTIONS
60
60
a
o
k-
==
Zo*=4d
40
o,.....~------~
'
40
==
20
2O
NDTT
1
0
-200
-150
-100
TEMPERATURE,~
-50
TEMPERATURE,~
-300 -
. -200
_ _
-100
-. 0
120
SA302B - SURVEILLANCE CORRELATION HEAT - 4bA
120
UNIRRADIATED
STATIC TOUGHNESS
100
e ~ 1 10-Zc I
o-f" = 1650 MPa (239 ksi)
;'o" = 4 d ~
SO
--
~o* = 2
60
RKR PREDICTIONS
2
==
80
-rr.D
~*- = 3
~o
4,0
v-
20
20
NDTT
-200
-150
-300
-5~
.l
TEMPERATURE, OC
TEMPERATURE,~
-300
I
-100
I
-200
120
DYNAMIC TOUGHNESS
~3X
100
100
102s -1
.0
80
Fig. 1 6 - C o m p a r i s o n of critical
stress model (RKR) predictions
with lower shelf dynamic
(impact) fracture toughness
values for unirradiated SA302B.
120
=__
RKR PREDICTIONS
z
3:
(3
so
60
i.-
2
40
o
20
20
NDTT
I
-1B0
0
-200
I
-100
-50
TEMPERATURE,~
TEMPERATURE (~
-300
240
-200
-100
200
100
~
B
"""
; o * = 350,urn
200
7,o* = 300/~ m
STATIC TOUGHNESS
~ 1 X 10 -2 s-1
200
300
d = 25/xm
160
DATA
160
v
~g
(L-T)
120
PREDICTIONS
o
C R I T I C A L STRESS MODEL
~
C R I T I C A L STRAIN MODEL
"
~ o
,.
: o* = 100~m = 4d
: ~ * = 75p-m = 3d
,~
::::
50/~m
= 2t
w
z
(3
4O
40
I NDTT
I
-150
I
-100
I
-50
I
0
[
50
I
100
I
150
TEMPEI~ATURE (~
TEMPERATURE (~
-300
-200
-100
100
200
300
'1
240
SA302B - SURVEI LLANCE CORRELATION HEAT - 4bA
~-
2110
X I0-2s -I
~ 1
,'E
= 33/~m
z
_~
200
UNIRRADIATED
STATIC TOUGHNESS
160 _
t60
DATA
9 PRE-CRACKED CHARPY (T-L)
o 1-T COMPACT (T-L)
~o*
PREDICTIONS
i
120
.....
= 150~m
120
.....
"="'
Zo* = 4 d o
~o* = 100p.m
~"
~~ = 3 d
80
80
,<
40
NDTT
-200
-150
-100
-50
_l
50
100
t
150
TEMPERATURE (~
TEMPERATURE.~
. . . . . .
--1
140
IO0
-100
I
100
2100
3011
z~
100
CODE
:~
t~,o
~ 12I~
; ~ 10-2 s-1
-~--
-.--6----
6O
J'
80
12-13
77-Z~
I~D~CATES INVALID Kic
A
j
60
y~/..4-/
.
9
2O
TEMPERATURE ~
*This represents a wider range of neutron fluences than was first analyzed by
Parks.7
~o-Si,~, % - = 3 d
so
400
I
the RKR c r i t i c a l cleavage s t r e s s model 4 for the p r e d i c t i o n of i r r a d i a t e d toughness at the lower shelf.
N e u t r o n i r r a d i a t i o n is a s s u m e d to i n c r e a s e the yield
s t r e n g t h ~-38 and r e d u c e the work h a r d e n i n g exponent, ~
while l e a v i n g the c r i t i c a l f r a c t u r e s t r e s s for cleavage
( 4 ) unchanged. The c h a r a c t e r i s t i c d i s t a n c e is also
c o n s i d e r e d u n a l t e r e d by i r r a d i a t i o n , s i n c e g r a i n s i z e
and p a r t i c l e s p a c i n g s will r e m a i n the s a m e . T h u s by
m e r e l y u t i l i z i n g the effects of i r r a d i a t i o n on yield and
flow p r o p e r t i e s , the t e m p e r a t u r e dependence of lower
shelf f r a c t u r e toughness as a function of n e u t r o n
fluence can be q u a n t i t a t i v e l y evaluated using the RKR
model, c a l i b r a t e d on u n i r r a d i a t e d m a t e r i a l .
Valid low t e m p e r a t u r e static f r a c t u r e toughness data
for u n i r r a d i a t e d and i r r a d i a t e d SA533B-1 is shown in
F i g . 19. I r r a d i a t e d data a r e shown for n e u t r o n f l u e n c e s
of 1.2 to 1.3, 36 2.2 to 4.2, 36,37,44 and 7.7 to 8.3 1019
n//cm2, 3s,39 E > 1 MeV, at i r r a d i a t i o n t e m p e r a t u r e s b e t w e e n 265 and 297~
U t i l i z i n g the RKR c r i t e r i o n for
cleavage f r a c t u r e in that the c r i t i c a l f r a c t u r e s t r e s s ,
m e a s u r e d in u n i r r a d i a t e d s t e e l (~7 = 1830 MPa), is
a t t a i n e d over a c h a r a c t e r i s t i c d i s t a n c e of 3 g r a i n
d i a m e t e r s ( l , = 3d), p r e d i c t i o n s for the t e m p e r a t u r e
dependence of Kic for these fluences* w e r e made, u s i n g
upper shelf temperatures are still unavailable. Moreo v e r , s o m e c o n c e r n might be r a i s e d o v e r the p r o c e d u r e of using a c h a r a c t e r i s t i c d i s t a n c e f o r i r r a d i a t e d
s t e e l d e t e r m i n e d f r o m u n i r r a d i a t e d d a t a (cf. c r i t i c a l
s t r e s s m o d e l ) . Since it a p p e a r s that the c h a r a c t e r i s t i c
d i s t a n c e f o r d u c t i l e f r a c t u r e m a y be a function both of
the m i c r o s t r u c t u r e (i.e., the i n t e r - i n c l u s i o n s p a c i n g )
and of the a v e r a g e n u m b e r of v o i d s which c o a l e s c e with
the c r a c k tip at c r a c k i n i t i a t i o n , it is by no m e a n s
c e r t a i n that the s a m e n u m b e r of v o i d s w i l l be involved
at f r a c t u r e i n i t i a t i o n in i r r a d i a t e d s t e e l . T h i s is s i m p l y
b e c a u s e the r e d u c e d s t r a i n h a r d e n i n g c a p a c i t y of
i r r a d i a t e d m a t e r i a l will r e s u l t in e a r l i e r c o a l e s c e n c e
by p l a s t i c s h e a r l o c a l i z a t i o n of m a j o r v o i d s . T h u s ,
the f e a s i b i l i t y of using the c r i t i c a l s t r a i n m o d e l f o r
p r e d i c t i n g upper shelf i r r a d i a t e d f r a c t u r e t o u g h n e s s
cannot be t e s t e d at p r e s e n t , and m u s t a w a i t r e l i a b l e
i n f o r m a t i o n f o r the c r i t i c a l f r a c t u r e s t r a i n s and i n i t i a t i o n JIc v a l u e s f o r i r r a d i a t e d s t e e l .
p r o v i d e s a v i t a l connection b e t w e e n continuum p l a s t i c i t y
and m i c r o s t r u c t u r a l m e c h a n i s m s of f r a c t u r e .
ACKNOWLEDGMENT S
The work was performed under
R P 8 8 6 - I f r o m the E l e c t r i c P o w e r
P a l o Alto, C a l i f o r n i a . T h a n k s a r e
B a s s a n i for his c r i t i c a l r e v i e w of
C o n t r a c t No.
Research Institute,
due to D r . John
the m a n u s c r i p t .
REFERENCES
1. Reports of the United States Atomic Energy Commission Heavy Section
Steel Technology (HSST) Program, HSST Technical Reports no. 1-36,
1968-1975.
2. R. A. Wullaert, J. W. Scheckherd, and R. W. Smith: ASTM STP 611, ASTM,
pp. 400-17, 1976.
3. R. H. Van Stone: General Electric Report no. SRD-78-116 for EPRI, pp.
5.1-5.13, General Electric Company, Schenectady, NY, July, 1978.
4. R. O. Ritchie, J. F. Knott, and J. R. Rice: J, Mech. Phys. Solids, 1973, vol.
21, pp. 395-410.
5. F. A. McClintock: Fracture, An Advanced Treatise, H. Leibowitz, ed., vol. 3,
pp. 47-225, Academic Press, NY, 1971.
6. A. C. MacKensie, J. W, Hancock, and D. K. Brown: Eng. Fract. Mech., 1977,
vol. 9, pp. 167-88.
7. D. M. Parks: J. Eng. Mater. Technol., Ser. H, 1976, vol. 98, pp. 30-35.
8. E. Orowan: Rep. Prog. Phys., 1948, vol. 12, p. 185.
9. J. F. Knott: Z Iron Steellnst., 1966, vol. 204, pp. 104-11.
] 0. J. W. Hutchinson: J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1968, vol. 16, pp. 13-31.
11. J. R. Rice and G. F. Rosengren: tbid., pp. 1-12.
12. J. R. Rice and D. M. Tracey: Numerical and ComputationalMethods in
StructuralMechanies, S. J. Fenves et al., eds, Academic Press, NY, 1973.
13. D. M. Tracey: J. Eng. Mater. Technol., Series H, 1976, vol. 98, pp. 146-51.
14. J. R. Rice and M. A. Johnson: Inelastic Behavior of Solids, M. F. Kanninen
et al., eds., p. 641, McGraw Hill, NY, 1970.
15~ R. M. McMeeking: J. Eng. Mater. Technol., Series H, t976, vol. 98, pp. 1465t.
I6. S. P. Rawal and J. Gurland: Met. Trans. A, 1977, vol. 8A, pp. 691-98.
17. D. A. Curry and J_ F. Knott: Met. Sci., 1976, voL 10, pp. 1-6.
18. D. A. Curry: C.E.R.L. Technical Report No. RD/L/N 64/78, Central Electricity Research Laboratory, Leatherhead, England, 1978.
19. H. J. Rack: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1976, vol. 24, pp. 165-70.
20. J. R. Rice: J. Appl. Mech., Set. E, 1968, vol. 35, p. 379.
21. T. R. Wilshaw, C. A. Rau, and A. S. Tetelman: Eng, Fract. Mech., 1968, vol.
1,pp. 191-211.
22. A. S. Tetelman, T. R. Wilshaw, and C. A. Rau: Int. J: Fract. Mech., 1968,
vol. 4, p. 147.
23. R. Hill: The Mathematical Theory of Plasticity, Oxford University Press, 1950.
24. A. P. Green and B. B. Hundy: d. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1956, vol. 4, pp. 128-44.
25. J. R. Griffiths and D. R. J. Owen: Ibid., 1971, vol. 19, pp. 419-31.
26. D. R. J. Owen, G. C. Nayak, A. P. Kfouri, and J. R. Griffi.ths: Int. J. Num.
Methods Eng., vol. 6, 1973, p. 63.
27. J. W. Hancock and A. C. MacKenzie: J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1976, vol. 24,
pp. 147-69.
28. R. O. Ritchie and R. M. Horn: Met. Trans. A., 1978, voL 9A, pp. 331-44.
29. P. W. Bridgman: Studies in Large Plastic Flow and Fracture, McGraw Hi!l,
1952.
30. R. M. McMeeking: J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1977, vo], 25, pp. 357-81.
31. R. K. Pandey and S. Banerjee: Eng. Fract. Mech., 1978, vol. 10, pp. 817-29.
32. J. R. Hester and C. R. Brooks: Proceedings of Heavy Section Steel Technology Program, Fourth Annual Information Meeting, Oak Ridge National
Laboratory, March/April 1970.
33. W. L. Server and W. Oldfield: EPRI Report no. NP-933, Electric Power
Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, December 1978.
34. J, D. I_andes and J. A. Begley: Westinghouse Scientific Paper 76-1E7JTINTF.P3, Westinghouse Scientific Laboratories, Pittsburgh, PA, May, 1976.
35. W. O. Shabbits: HSST Technical Report no. 13, Westinghouse Electric Corp.,
Pittsburgh, PA, December, I970.
36. J. R. Mager and F. O. Thomas: HSST Technical Report no. 5, Westinghouse
Electric Corp., Pittsburgh, PA, November, 1969.
37. G. W. Hunter and J. A. Williams: Nuc. Eng. Des., 1971, voL 17, pp. 131-48.
38. J. A. Williams: HSST Technical Report no. 31, Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory, Richlaud, WA, 1973.
39. W. Oldfield, R. A. Wullaert, W. L. Server, and T. R. Wilshaw: ETI Technical
Report no. TR75-34R, Effects Technology, Inc., Santa Barbara, CA, July, 1975.
40. J. M. Steichen and J. A. Williams: HSST Technical Report no. 32, Hanford
Engineering Development Laboratory, Richland, WA, July, 1973.
V O L U M E IOA, O C T O B E R 1 9 7 9 - 1 5 6 9
41. W. L. Server: J. Eng. Mater. Technol., Ser. H, 1978, vol. 100, pp. 183-88.
42. P. E. Bennett and G. M. Sinclair: J. Basic Eng., Ser. D, 1966, vol. 88,
pp. 518-24.
43. J. A. Williams: HSST Technical Report no. 36, Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory, Richland, WA, January, 1975.
METALLURGICAL TRANSACTIONS A