You are on page 1of 2

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

114 / Wednesday, June 14, 2006 / Notices 34375

417) and the Generic Animal Drug and testing phase of the regulatory review Dated: May 17, 2006.
Patent Term Restoration Act (Public period, while 335 days occurred during Jane A. Axelrad,
Law 100–670) generally provide that a the approval phase. These periods of Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug
patent may be extended for a period of time were derived from the following Evaluation and Research.
up to 5 years so long as the patented dates: [FR Doc. E6–9224 Filed 6–13–06; 8:45 am]
item (human drug product, animal drug 1. The date an exemption under BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
product, medical device, food additive, section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
or color additive) was subject to and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C.
regulatory review by FDA before the 355(i)) became effective: May 25, 1995. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
item was marketed. Under these acts, a The applicant claims April 24, 1995, as HUMAN SERVICES
product’s regulatory review period the date the investigational new drug
forms the basis for determining the application (IND) became effective. Food and Drug Administration
amount of extension an applicant may However, FDA records indicate that the
[Docket No. 2006E–0042]
receive. IND effective date was May 25, 1995,
A regulatory review period consists of which was 30 days after FDA receipt of Determination of Regulatory Review
two periods of time: A testing phase and the IND. Period for Purposes of Patent
an approval phase. For human drug 2. The date the application was Extension; CUBICIN
products, the testing phase begins when initially submitted with respect to the
the exemption to permit the clinical human drug product under section AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration,
investigations of the human drug 505(b) of the act: December 21, 2000. HHS.
product becomes effective and runs FDA has verified the applicant’s claim ACTION: Notice.
until the approval phase begins. The that the new drug application (NDA) for
approval phase starts with the initial DUTASTERIDE (NDA 21–319) was SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
submission of an application to market initially submitted on December 21, Administration (FDA) has determined
the human drug product and continues 2000. the regulatory review period for
until FDA grants permission to market 3. The date the application was CUBICIN and is publishing this notice
the drug product. Although only a approved: November 20, 2001. FDA has of that determination as required by
portion of a regulatory review period verified the applicant’s claim that NDA law. FDA has made the determination
may count toward the actual amount of 21–319 was approved on November 20, because of the submission of an
extension that the Director of Patents 2001. application to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks may award (for This determination of the regulatory and Trademarks, Department of
example, half the testing phase must be review period establishes the maximum Commerce, for the extension of a patent
subtracted as well as any time that may potential length of a patent extension. that claims that human drug product.
have occurred before the patent was However, the U.S. Patent and ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
issued), FDA’s determination of the Trademark Office applies several and petitions to the Division of Dockets
length of a regulatory review period for statutory limitations in its calculations Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
a human drug product will include all of the actual period for patent extension. Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
of the testing phase and approval phase In its application for patent extension, 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B). this applicant seeks 769 days of patent electronic comments to http://
FDA recently approved for marketing term extension. www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
the human drug product DUTASTERIDE Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
(dutasteride). DUTASTERIDE is
indicated for the treatment of submit to the Division of Dockets Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
symptomatic benign prostatic Management (see ADDRESSES) written or Policy (HFD–7), Food and Drug
hyperplasia in men with an enlarged electronic comments and ask for a Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
prostate gland. Subsequent to this redetermination by August 14, 2006. Rockville, MD 20857, 301–594–2041.
approval, the Patent and Trademark Furthermore, any interested person may SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Office received a patent term restoration petition FDA for a determination Price Competition and Patent Term
application for DUTASTERIDE (U.S. regarding whether the applicant for Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
Patent No. 5,565,467) from extension acted with due diligence 417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
GlaxoSmithKline, and the Patent and during the regulatory review period by Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
Trademark Office requested FDA’s December 11, 2006. To meet its burden, Law 100–670) generally provide that a
assistance in determining this patent’s the petition must contain sufficient facts patent may be extended for a period of
eligibility for patent term restoration. In to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. up to 5 years so long as the patented
a letter dated October 31, 2002, FDA Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., item (human drug product, animal drug
advised the Patent and Trademark pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in product, medical device, food additive,
Office that this human drug product had the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30. or color additive) was subject to
undergone a regulatory review period Comments and petitions should be regulatory review by FDA before the
and that the approval of DUTASTERIDE submitted to the Division of Dockets item was marketed. Under these acts, a
represented the first permitted Management. Three copies of any product’s regulatory review period
commercial marketing or use of the mailed information are to be submitted, forms the basis for determining the
product. Shortly thereafter, the Patent except that individuals may submit one amount of extension an applicant may
and Trademark Office requested that copy. Comments are to be identified receive.
FDA determine the product’s regulatory with the docket number found in A regulatory review period consists of
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES

review period. brackets in the heading of this two periods of time: A testing phase and
FDA has determined that the document. Comments and petitions may an approval phase. For human drug
applicable regulatory review period for be seen in the Division of Dockets products, the testing phase begins when
DUTASTERIDE is 2,373 days. Of this Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., the exemption to permit the clinical
time, 2,038 days occurred during the Monday through Friday. investigations of the drug becomes

VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:47 Jun 13, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00076 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM 14JNN1
34376 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 14, 2006 / Notices

effective and runs until the approval which was 30 days after FDA receipt of DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
phase begins. The approval phase starts the IND. HUMAN SERVICES
with the initial submission of an 2. The date the application was
application to market the human drug National Institutes of Health
initially submitted with respect to the
product and continues until FDA grants human drug product under section
permission to market the drug product. National Institute of Allergy and
505(b) of the act: December 20, 2002. Infectious Diseases; Cooperative
Although only a portion of a regulatory
FDA has verified the applicant’s claim Research and Development Agreement
review period may count toward the
actual amount of extension that the that the new drug application (NDA) for (CRADA) Opportunity for Furthering
Director of Patents and Trademarks may CUBICIN (NDA 21–572) was initially the Development of a Suite of
award (for example, half the testing submitted on December 20, 2002. Computer Programs for Modeling and
phase must be subtracted as well as any 3. The date the application was Simulating Complex Cellular Biological
time that may have occurred before the approved: September 12, 2003. FDA has Processes
patent was issued), FDA’s determination verified the applicant’s claim that NDA ACTION: Notice.
of the length of a regulatory review 21–572 was approved on September 12,
period for a human drug product will 2003. SUMMARY: The National Institute of
include all of the testing phase and This determination of the regulatory Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID),
approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. a component of the National Institutes
review period establishes the maximum
156(g)(1)(B). of Health (NIH), Department of Health
potential length of a patent extension.
FDA recently approved for marketing and Human Services (HHS), seeks to
However, the U.S. Patent and
the human drug product CUBICIN enter into a CRADA with a commercial
Trademark Office applies several
(daptomycin). CUBICIN is indicated for partner to co-develop a suite of
the treatment of complicated skin and statutory limitations in its calculations
computer programs for modeling and
skin structure infections caused by of the actual period for patent extension.
simulating complex cellular biological
susceptible strains of the following In its application for patent extension, processes.
Gram-positive microorganisms: this applicant seeks 1,347 days of patent The existing suite of computer
Staphylococcus aureus (including term extension. programs allows biologists to develop
methicillin-resistant strains), Anyone with knowledge that any of and test quantitative models of cell
Streptococcus pyogenes, S. agalactiae, the dates as published are incorrect may biological processes. The graphical
S. dysgalactiae subsp. equismilis, and submit to the Division of Dockets interfaces of the programs make it
Enterococcus faecalis (vancomycin- Management (see ADDRESSES) written or possible to develop realistic models of
susceptible strains only). Subsequent to electronic comments and ask for a molecular interactions and cellular
this approval, the Patent and Trademark redetermination by August 14, 2006. processes that take into account the
Office received a patent term restoration Furthermore, any interested person may intracellular and extracellular spatial
application for CUBICIN (U.S. Patent petition FDA for a determination inhomogeneity of signaling components
No. 4,885,243) from Cubist regarding whether the applicant for without the user having to deal with the
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and the Patent extension acted with due diligence partial differential equations and state
and Trademark Office requested FDA’s automata that underlie the quantitative
during the regulatory review period by
assistance in determining this patent’s simulation of the models. The program
December 11, 2006. To meet its burden,
eligibility for patent term restoration. In suite offers graphical symbols and drag-
the petition must contain sufficient facts
a letter dated February 24, 2006, FDA and-drop mechanisms to define
advised the Patent and Trademark to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. molecular interactions, molecular
Office that this human drug product had Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., complexes, cellular stimulus-response
undergone a regulatory review period pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in mechanisms, and the structure of
and that the approval of CUBICIN the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30. extracellular compartments. An
represented the first permitted Comments and petitions should be intuitive graphical interface can be used
commercial marketing or use of the submitted to the Division of Dockets to inspect and interact with running
product. Shortly thereafter, the Patent Management. Three copies of any simulations; for example, molecules and
and Trademark Office requested that mailed information are to be submitted, cells can be placed into the simulated
FDA determine the product’s regulatory except that individuals may submit one compartments, cells can be selected for
review period. copy. Comments are to be identified detailed analysis of their behavior and
FDA has determined that the with the docket number found in intracellular, spatially-resolved
applicable regulatory review period for brackets in the heading of this biochemistry. One part of the program
CUBICIN is 6,444 days. Of this time, document. Comments and petitions may suite reads the molecular interaction
6,177 days occurred during the testing be seen in the Division of Dockets network data that are generated by the
phase of the regulatory review period, Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., program based on the user defined
while 267 days occurred during the Monday through Friday. bimolecular interactions and displays
approval phase. These periods of time them as interaction graphs, visualizing
were derived from the following dates: Dated: May 17, 2006. the reaction dynamics in the modeled
1. The date an exemption under Jane A. Axelrad, cellular signaling pathways.
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug, Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug It is anticipated that the collaboration
and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. Evaluation and Research. will result in the commercialization of
355(i)) became effective: January 22, [FR Doc. E6–9225 Filed 6–13–06; 8:45 am] the software.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES

1986. The applicant claims January 18, BILLING CODE 4160–01–S DATES: NIAID will consider all
1986, as the date the investigational new capability statements received within 45
drug application (IND) became effective. days of the date of publication of this
However, FDA records indicate that the notice. Capability statements received
IND effective date was January 22, 1986, thereafter may be considered if a

VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:47 Jun 13, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00077 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM 14JNN1

You might also like