Professional Documents
Culture Documents
========================================
When teachers have the freedom to choose course materials, they need to take a
structured approach to coursebook evaluation and base their decision on certain
criteria that will help them judge whether the coursebook will be suitable for a
particular group of learners. Cunningsworth (1995:14) points out that coursebook
analysis and evaluation is useful in teacher development and helps teachers to gain
good and useful insights into the nature of the material. Similarly, in teacher training,
materials evaluation is a valuable component and serves the dual purpose of
sensitizing student teachers to some of the more important features to look for in
coursebooks and familiarizing them with a range of published materials.
It is very important to make the right decision concerning the choice of a coursebook
because the results of an evaluation will probably lead to a large investment of
money in a published course and from the moment such an investment is made, you
will probably have to live with the consequences of it for some time, even if it later
proves to have been a bad choice (Hutchinson & Waters 1987:96).
Hutchinson and Waters (ibid.: 97) describe the evaluation of a coursebook as a
matching process: matching needs to available solution. The first step in this
matching process is carrying out needs analysis which involves the assessment of
learners need and aims concerning the language they are going to learn. Other factors
that need to be considered are learners gender, nationalities and educational
backgrounds. Apart from learners, teachers need to think about themselves as well,
and various aspects of a learning teaching situation, such as the methodological
approach they tend to prefer, the level of personal initiative they bring to their
teaching, their freedom to diverge from the syllabus and whether they have the right
to adapt or supplement the standard coursebook (Cunningsworth, 1995).
The next step in evaluation a coursebook is considering the aims and objectives of the
course such as the language items, skills and functions that have to be covered (ibid.).
Not less important is the context in which the learning and the teaching
processes will take place such as the role and status of the target
language in learners home country, the intensity and length of the
course, the availability of technical and other resources, and so on.
S
means the extent to which students are likely to find the
coursebook
interesting.
stands for the question whether the book has been tried and
tested in real
learning situations.
Another three-stage procedure that will allow teachers to assess books on basis of
their own beliefs and their assessment of their students needs and circumstances is
suggested by Harmer (2001: 301-302):
Selecting areas for assessment: we first need to list the features we wish to
look at in the coursebook(s) under consideration, as in the following example:
Price (of coursebook components)
Availability
Layout and design
Instructions
Methodology
Syllabus type, selection and grading
Language study activities
Language skill activities
Topics
Cultural acceptability
Usability
Teachers guide
Stating beliefs: we are now in a position to make belief statements about any
or all of the areas we have decided to concentrate on. Thus can be done by a
group of teachers writing their individual beliefs and then combining them an
agreed set such as the following statements about layout:
The page should look clean and uncluttered
The lesson sequence should be easy to follow
The illustrations should be attractive and appropriate
The instructions should be easy to read
Using statements for assessment: we are now ready to use our statements of
belief as assessment items. This means that for each of our areas we list our
statements, and can then use a simple tick and cross system to compare
different books, as in this layout and design checklist:
Area
Assessment statements
The instructions
easy to read.
are
Guideline Four suggests that the course-book should not only support
learning but it should also provide a methodology.
There are a number of checklists that may help teachers make the right choice of
coursebook materials. They usually contain key categories and a number of questions
for each of them. Hedge (2000: 358) gives an example of such a checklist:
Category
The view of language
Questions
What levels of language receive attention?
How is the language system categorized?
Are social aspects of language as communication taken
into account, e.g. level of formality?
The view of language Is there explicit reference to grammatical terms and
learning
concepts?
Is there an appropriate balance of accuracy and fluency
activities?
Is there a balance of modes of language use, i.e. listening,
speaking, reading and writing?
Does the first language have a role in the materials?
Learners
What age group do the materials have in mind?
How does the book relate to the needs of learners?
Is the content interesting and challenging to the learners?
The view of education Does the book have general educational goals?
Are these appropriate to the learners?
Do they fit the national curriculum?
Do the materials encourage learner independence?
The environment of Does the teachers role in the book fit in with local
learning
perceptions?
Is the cultural content accessible/appropriate?
Is the grading and sequencing appropriate to the amount
and intensity of time available?
Grants questionnaires (1987: 122-127) can also be very helpful for teachers when
they have to choose and evaluate coursebooks:
Questionnaire - Part 1: Does the book suit to your students?
1. Is it attractive? Given the average age of your students, would they enjoy using it?
2. Is it culturally acceptable?
3. Does it reflect what you know about your students' needs and interests?
4. Is it about the right level of difficulty?
5. Is it about the right length?
6. Are the course's physical characteristics appropriate?
7. Are there enough authentic materials, so that the students can see that the book
is relevant to real life?
8. Does it achieve an acceptable balance between knowledge about the language, and
practice in using the language?
9. Does it achieve an acceptable balance between the relevant language skills, and
integrate them so that work in one skill area helps the others?
10. Does the book contain enough communicative activities to enable the students to
use the language independently?
Questionnaire - Part 2: Does the book suit the teacher?
1. Is your overall impression of the contents and layout of the course favourable?
2. Is there a good, clear teacher's guide with answers and help on methods and
additional activities?
3. Can one use the book in the classroom without constantly having to turn to the
teacher's guide?
4. Are the recommended methods and approaches suitable for you, your students
and your classroom?
5. Are the approaches easily adaptable if necessary?
6. Does using the course require little or no time-consuming preparation?
7. Are useful ancillary materials such as tapes, workbooks and visuals provided?
8. Is there sufficient provision made for tests and revision?
9. Does the book use a 'spiral' approach, so that items are regularly revised and
used again in different contexts?
10. Is the course appropriate for, and liked by, colleagues?
Questionnaire - Part 3: Does the textbook suit the syllabus and examination?
1. Has the book been recommended or approved by the authorities?
2. Does the book follow the official syllabus in a creative manner?
3. Is the course well-graded, so that it gives well-structured and systematic
coverage of the language?
Aims
Content
Questions
Who is the material intended for? (Learners ages,
gender,
nationality, study or work specialism, status/role with
respect to
specialism, knowledge of English, knowledge of
specialism,
knowledge of the world, educational backgrounds,
interests.)
What are the aims of the materials?
What type(s) of linguistic description is/are used in
the materials?
What language points do the materials cover? (What
particular
structures, functions, vocabulary areas?)
What is the proportion of work on each skill? Is there
skills
integrated work?
What micro-skills are covered in the material?
What kinds of texts are there in the materials? (For
example
manuals, letters, dialogues, reports, visual texts,
listening texts.)
What is/are the subject-matter area(s), assumed
level of knowledge,
and types of topics in the materials? What treatment
are the topics
given? (For example medicine, biology; secondary
school, first
year college, postgraduate level of knowledge;
hospital
organisation, medical technology as types of topics;
straightforward topic treatment, factual.)
How is the content organised throughout the
materials? (Around
language points, by subject-matter, by study skills,
by a
combination of means.)
How is the content organised within the units? (By a
set pattern of
components, by a variety of patterns.)
How is the content sequenced throughout the book?
(From easier to
more difficult, to create variety, to provide recycling,
for example.)
How is the content sequenced within a unit? (From
guided to free,
from comprehension to production.)
Methodology What theory/ies of learning are the materials based
on?
What attitudes to/expectations about learning
English are the
materials based on?
What kinds of exercises/tasks are included in the
materials? (For
example guided or free, comprehension-orientated or
production
orientated, ones that require one right answer or can
be given many
possible right answers, mechanical ones or problemsolving ones,
role plays, simulation, drama games.)
What teaching-learning techniques can be used with
the materials?
(Pair-work, small-group work, student presentations,
for instance.)
What aids do the materials require? (Cassette
recorders, overhead
projectors, realia, wall charts, video.)
What guidance do the materials provide? (Lists of
vocabulary and
language-skills points, technical information,
suggestions for
further work, tests, and methodological hints.)
In what ways are the materials flexible? (Can they be
begun at
different points? Can the units be used in different
orders? Can they
be linked to other materials? Can they be used
Others
expectations of the course, and if necessary, what further steps we need to take.
Harmer (2001: 302-302) suggests three steps:
Teacher discussion: when new books are being used it helps if the teachers
who are using the same book get together and compare their experience. This
may involve going through lessons (and exercises) one by one, or it may
centre around a discussion of the audio material and its related exercises.
Someone in the group should circulate a record of what is said, so that
teachers can review the discussions before coming to a conclusion.
Using coursebooks
In some situations teachers have to follow a set coursebook and are not allowed to
make any modifications. In other situations they are given a syllabus and they have to
choose and design the materials according to the needs of the learners and the
requirements of the programme. Probably the most likely situation is where teachers
use a coursebook, but they are free to use it selectively and to supplement it with other
materials.
Grant (1987: 7-8) maintains that perfect coursebooks do not exist,
but there is a best book available for every teacher and their
learners due to the wide range of published materials on the
market. According to him, the ideal coursebook should satisfy three
conditions: it should suit learners needs, interests and abilities, it
should suit the teachers, and it also has to meet the needs of official
easily packed and stacked; it does not depend for its use on hardware or a supply of
electricity.
6. Guidance
For teachers who are inexperienced or occasionally unsure of their knowledge of the
language, the coursebook can provide useful guidance and support.
7. Autonomy
The learner can use the coursebook to learn new material, review and monitor
progress with some degree of autonomy. A learner without a coursebook is more
teacher-dependent.
Despite the advantages of coursebooks for both teachers and learners, there are some
drawbacks as well. Because in a way coursebooks impose certain teaching
methodologies, it is advisable for teachers to change the coursebooks after certain
period of time so that they can have an opportunity to re-evaluate the coursebook they
have been using and to reflect on their beliefs about language learning and teaching.
Teachers should also be aware that they should not follow the coursebook rigidly if
they feel that it does not satisfy the learners needs or the program requirements.
Harmer (1991: 257) points out that coursebooks can have negative
effects on teaching
as well, since they tend to concentrate on introducing new language
and controlled work, which might result in teachers depending
heavily on the course-book. Since textbooks tend to follow the same
format from one unit to the next, each unit looks more or less alike.
Thus, a teacher who over-uses a textbook and thus repeatedly
follows the sequence in each unit may become boring over a period
of time for he will find himself teaching the same type of activities in
the same order again and again. In such a situation, even with good
textbooks, students may find the study of English becoming routine
and thus less and less motivating. Classes will start appearing
increasingly similar and the routine will become increasingly
monotonous.
Ur (1991: 185) adds other disadvantages of using coursebooks:
1. Inadequacy
Every class in fact, every learner has their own learning needs: no one coursebook
can possibly supply these satisfactorily.
2. Irrelevance, lack of interest
The topics dealt in the coursebook may not necessarily be relevant or interesting for
your class.
3. Limitation
A coursebook is confining: its set structure and sequence may inhibit a teachers
initiative and creativity, and lead to boredom and lack of motivation on the part of the
learners.
4. Homogeneity
Coursebooks have their own rationale and chosen teaching/learning approach. They
do no usually cater for the variety of levels of ability and knowledge, or of learning
styles and strategies that exist in most classes.
5. Over-easiness
Teachers find it too easy to follow the coursebook uncritically instead of using their
initiative; they may find themselves functioning merely as mediators of its content
instead of as teachers in their own right.
Grant (1987: 13) compares traditional coursebooks to those
published under the influence of the communicative approach in
order to get a clearer picture of the differences between the two
types of materials and says that these days the word
communicative is on everyones lips. Almost every new textbook
claims to be communicative. He explains that traditional
coursebooks emphasise the grammatical aspect of language and
concentrate on accuracy rather than fluency. They contain more
reading and writing activities than speaking or listening ones, so
that students learning from such materials will probably find it
difficult to achieve successful oral communication. The main
problem with traditional textbooks is this: students work through
them, sometimes for years, and often conscientiously. However,
despite this, at the end of their studies they are still incapable of
using the language: they may 'know' its grammar - the system - but
they can't communicate in it (ibid.). Communicative coursebooks,
according to Grant, emphasise the importance of communicative
functions, contain activities centred around skills using, reflect the
authentic language of everyday life and encourage intensive
cooperation among students, and in that way they make heavier
demands on teachers organisational abilities. Students working with
such materials are more likely to produce fluent oral communication
than those learning from traditional course-books.
Harmer (1991: 258) claims that coursebooks rarely provide a
balanced selection of skills and activities and focus on presenting
language and controlled practice. The need for balance is a
methodological consideration since it is through this balance that
students are exposed to a variety of learning experiences that will
help them to acquire and learn English, and the best person to
achieve to achieve the correct balance is the teacher who knows the
students and can gauge the need for variety and what the balance
should be. He concludes that a coursebook should not be considered
as a sacred text but rather as an aid: Teachers will have to work out
the best way to use their books: they should never let the textbook
use them, or dictate the decisions they make about the activities in
which the students are going to be involved (ibid.).
Hutchinson and Waters (1987: 107-108) identify six main purposes
of course materials:
Cunningsworth summarises the roles of coursebooks by stating that they identify the
main role of the teacher as that of a guide or facilitator and a monitor. Essentially, the
teacher is seen as guiding learners through the learning process, with support from the
course-book, and monitoring student progress, correcting errors when this is useful for
the learning process (Cunningsworth 1995:110).
References
Cunnigsworht, A. (1995). Choosing your Course book. Oxford: Heinemann.
Grant, N. (1987). Making the Most of Your Textbook. London: Longman.
Harmer. J. (1991). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Harlow: Longman.
Harmer, J. (2001). The Practice of English Language Teaching. (3rd ed.) Harlow:
Longman.
Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Hutchinson, T. and Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: A learningcentered approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ur, P. (1991). A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.