You are on page 1of 3

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

40 / Wednesday, March 1, 2006 / Proposed Rules 10459

12866, as amended by Executive Order Disability Insurance; 96.002, Social 902(a)(5), 1382, 1382c, 1382h, 1383(a), (c),
13258. Thus, they were subject to OMB Security—Retirement Insurance; 96.004, and (d)(1), and (p), and 1383b; secs. 4(c) and
review. Social Security—Survivors Insurance; 5, 6(c)–(e), 14(a), and 15, Pub. L. 98–460, 98
96.006, Supplemental Security Income.) Stat. 1794, 1801, 1802, and 1808 (42 U.S.C.
Regulatory Flexibility Act 421 note, 423 note, 1382h note).
We certify that these proposed rules List of Subjects 4. Revise § 416.913(a)(3) to read as
would not have a significant economic 20 CFR Part 404 follows:
impact on a substantial number of small Administrative practice and § 416.913 Medical and other evidence of
entities because they would affect only procedure, Blind, Disability benefits, your impairment(s).
individuals. Thus, a regulatory Old-age, Survivors and Disability (a) * * *
flexibility analysis as provided in the Insurance, Reporting and recordkeeping (3) Licensed optometrists, for
Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended, requirements, Social Security. purposes of establishing visual
is not required.
20 CFR Part 416 disorders only (except, in the U.S.
Paperwork Reduction Act Virgin Islands, licensed optometrists, for
Administrative practice and the measurement of visual acuity and
These proposed rules do not impose procedure, Aged, Blind, Disability
any new reporting requirements on the visual fields only). (See paragraph (f) of
benefits, Public assistance programs, this section for the evidence needed for
public. Reporting and recordkeeping statutory blindness);
List of References requirements, Supplemental Security
* * * * *
Income (SSI).
During development of these [FR Doc. E6–2852 Filed 2–28–06; 8:45 am]
proposed rules, we reviewed the Dated: December 20, 2006.
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
following information: Jo Anne B. Barnhart,
• Council on Optometric Education, Commissioner of Social Security.
Accreditation Manual: Professional For the reasons set out in the
Optometric Degree Programs, St. Louis, preamble, we propose to amend subpart DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
MO, 10/1998. P of part 404 and subpart I of part 416
• American Optometric Association, of chapter III of title 20 of the Code of
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
State/Territory Statutory Language the Administration
Federal Regulations as set forth below:
Practice of Optometry, 3/2002.
• American Optometric Association, PART 404—FEDERAL OLD-AGE, 50 CFR Part 600
Optometric Clinical Practice Guidelines. SURVIVORS AND DISABILITY
1. Comprehensive Adult Eye and [Docket No. 050520139–6034–03; I.D.
INSURANCE (1950– ) 030305A]
Vision Examination, St. Louis, MO, 5/1/
1994. Subpart P—[Amended] RIN 0648–AS46
2. Care of the Patient with Primary
Angle Closure Glaucoma, St. Louis, MO, 1. The authority citation for subpart P
of part 404 continues to read as follows: Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions;
6/23/1994. Fishing Capacity Reduction Program;
3. Care of the Patient with Anterior Authority: Secs. 202, 205(a), (b), and (d)– Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands King and
Uveitis, St. Louis, MO, 6/23/1994. (h), 216(i), 221(a) and (i), 222(c), 223, 225, Tanner Crabs; Industry Fee System for
4. Care of the Patient with Age- and 702(a)(5) of the Social Security Act (42 Fishing Capacity Reduction Loan
Related Macular Degeneration, St. U.S.C. 402, 405(a), (b), and (d)–(h), 416(i),
Louis, MO, 6/23/1994. 421(a) and (i), 422(c), 423, 425, and AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
5. Care of the Patient with Amblyopia, 902(a)(5)); sec. 211(b), Pub. L. 104–193, 110 Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
St. Louis, MO, 6/29/1994. Stat. 2105, 2189. Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
6. Care of the Patient with Open Angle 2. Revise § 404.1513(a)(3) to read as Commerce.
Glaucoma, St. Louis, MO, 3/23/1995. follows: ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
7. Care of the Patient with Retinal comments.
§ 404.1513 Medical and other evidence of
Detachment and Related Peripheral your impairment(s).
Vitreoretinal Disease, St. Louis, MO, 4/ SUMMARY: NMFS publishes this
(a) * * *
27/1995. (3) Licensed optometrists, for proposed rule to exempt any crab
8. Care of the Patient with Strabismus: purposes of establishing visual landed under the Community
Esotropia and Exotropia, St. Louis, MO, disorders only (except, in the U.S. Development Quota (CDQ) Program
6/28/1995. Virgin Islands, licensed optometrists, for from the fee regulations for the Bering
9. Care of the Adult Patient with Sea/Aleutian Islands King and Tanner
the measurement of visual acuity and
Cataract, St. Louis, MO, 6/28/1995. Crab Fishing Capacity Reduction
visual fields only);
10. Care of the Patient with Diabetes Program, to provide that crab buyers
Mellitus, St. Louis, MO, 5/1/1998. * * * * * disburse fee collections to NMFS not
• National Board of Examiners in later than the 7th calendar day of each
PART 416—SUPPLEMENTAL
Optometry, ‘‘Topic outline of national month, and to provide that the annual
SECURITY INCOME FOR THE AGED,
test’’, http://www.optometry.org. report from each crab buyer shall be
These references are included in the BLIND, AND DISABLED
submitted to NMFS by July 1 of each
rulemaking record for these proposed Subpart I—[Amended] calendar year. The fee regulations
erjones on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS

rules and are available for inspection by otherwise remain unchanged. The intent
interested individuals making 3. The authority citation for subpart I of this proposed rule is to modify the fee
arrangements with the contact person of part 416 continues to read as follows: rules so that they do not apply to any
shown in this preamble. Authority: Secs. 702(a)(5), 1611, 1614, crab allocated pursuant to the CDQ
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance 1619, 1631(a), (c), and (d)(1), and (p), and Program, and to ease the fee collection
Program Nos. 96.001, Social Security— 1633 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. burden for crab buyers.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:37 Feb 28, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM 01MRP1
10460 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 40 / Wednesday, March 1, 2006 / Proposed Rules

DATES: Written comments on this interested in the program’s full allocations from the fee regulations
proposed rule must be received by implementation details should refer to because they did not vote in the crab
March 31, 2006. these two documents. NMFS initially buyback program’s fee referendum,
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments proposed and adopted the program’s NMFS did not include the ex-vessel
by any of the following methods: implementation rule as section 600.1018 value of crab landed under the CDQ
• E-mail: 0648–AS46@noaa.gov. of Subpart L of 50 CFR part 600, but allocations in the required formula for
Include in the subject line the following NMFS has since, without other change, establishing the reduction loan sub-
identifier: BSAI Crab Buyback RIN re-designated the rule as section amounts for whose repayment the
0648–AS46. E-mail comments, with or 600.1103 in a new subpart M of part reduction fishery was responsible, and
without attachments, are limited to 5 600. the recipients of the CDQ allocations do
megabytes. NMFS allocated the prospective not directly benefit from the crab
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: $97,399,357.11 million reduction loan buyback.
http:www.regulations.gov. to the six reduction endorsement NMFS has been informed by crab
• Mail: Michael A. Sturtevant, fisheries involved, as the following sub- buyers that requiring fee principal
Financial Services Division, National amounts: disbursement to NMFS on the last
Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 East- 1. Bristol Bay red king, business day of the month presents
West Highway, Silver Spring, MD $17,129,957.23, problems in properly accounting for
20910–3282. 2. BSAI C. opilio and C. bairdi, crab landings in a timely fashion. Crab
• Fax: (301) 713–1306. $66,410,767.20, buyers are unable to complete their
3. Aleutian Islands brown king, accounting process prior to the end of
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
$6,380,837.19, that business day. Therefore, in order to
Michael A. Sturtevant, Financial
4. Aleutian Islands red king, allow crab buyers sufficient time to
Services Division, NMFS headquarters,
$237,588.04, disburse fee principal, NMFS proposes
at 301–713–2390. 5. Pribilof red king and blue king, that deposit principal disbursement
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: $1,571,216.35, and shall be made to NMFS not later than
Electronic Access 6. St. Matthew blue king, the 7th calendar day of each month.
$5,668,991.10. NMFS also proposes that the annual
This Federal Register document is On November 24, 2004, NMFS report from each crab buyer shall be
also accessible via the Internet at the published another Federal Register submitted to NMFS by July 1 of each
Office of the Federal Register’s Web site notice (69 FR 68313) advising the public calendar year. This should allow ample
at http://www.access.gpo.gov/su-docs/ that NMFS would, beginning on time for the State of Alaska to publish
aces/aces140.html. December 27, 2004, tender the crab average crab price data for the previous
Background reduction program’s reduction calendar year.
payments to the 25 accepted bidders.
Sections 312(b)-(e) of the Magnuson- On December 27, 2004, NMFS required Classification
Stevens Fishery Conservation and all accepted bidders to then The Assistant Administrator for
Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1861a(b) permanently stop all further fishing Fisheries, NOAA (AA), has determined
through (e)) generally authorized fishing with the reduction vessels and permits. that this proposed rule is consistent
capacity reduction programs. In Subsequently, NMFS: with the Magnuson-Stevens Act and
particular, section 312(d) authorized 1. Disbursed $97,399,357.11 in other applicable laws.
industry fee systems for repaying the reduction payments to 25 accepted This proposed rule has been
reduction loans which finance bidders; determined to be not significant for
reduction program costs. 2. Revoked the relinquished reduction purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Subpart L of 50 CFR part 600 is the permits; NMFS has certified to the Small
framework rule generally implementing 3. Revoked each reduction vessel’s Business Administration, under Section
sections 312(b)-(e). fishing history; 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act,
Sections 1111 and 1112 of the 4. Notified the National Vessel that this proposed rule would not have
Merchant Marine Act, 1936 (46 App. Documentation Center to revoke the a significant economic impact on a
U.S.C. 1279f and 1279g) generally reduction vessels’ fishery trade substantial number of small entities.
authorized reduction loans. endorsements and appropriately There are currently six CDQ groups
The Consolidated Appropriations Act annotate the reduction vessel’s that receive CDQ crab allocations and
of 2001 (Public Law 106–554) directed document; and participate in the BSAI crab fisheries.
the Secretary of Commerce to establish 5. Notified the U.S. Maritime This proposed rule seeks to revise the
a $100 million fishing capacity Administration to prohibit the reduction regulations to expressly exclude the
reduction program in the Bering Sea/ vessel’s transfer to foreign ownership or recipients of the CDQ allocations from
Aleutian Islands king and Tanner crab registry. the crab buyback program’s fee
fishery. Congress amended the On July 28, 2005, NMFS published a collection system. The CDQ groups
authorizing act twice (Public Law 107– Federal Register document (70 FR allocations did not vote in the crab
20 and Public Law 107–117), once to 43673) proposing regulations to buyback program’s fee referendum and
change the crab reduction program’s implement the crab buyback program’s NMFS did not include the ex-vessel
funding from a $50 million industry fee system. value of crab landed under the CDQ
appropriation and a $50 million loan to On September 16, 2005, NMFS allocations for establishing the
a $100 million loan and once to clarify published a Federal Register document reduction loan sub-amounts.
erjones on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS

provisions about crab fishery vessels. (70 FR 54652) implementing the crab The total fee to be collected for any
NMFS published the crab reduction buyback program’s industry fee system given year is calculated based on a
program’s proposed implementation regulations. Fee collection and payment formula using projected landings, the
rule on December 12, 2002 (67 FR began on October 17, 2005. interest rate, and the amortization
76329) and its final rule on December NMFS proposes to exempt any crab schedule, and it is calculated in advance
12, 2003 (68 FR 69331). Anyone landed by the recipients of the CDQ for the entire year. In determining the

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:37 Feb 28, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM 01MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 40 / Wednesday, March 1, 2006 / Proposed Rules 10461

annual fee, the contributions from six CDQ groups would be positively (b) * * *
recipients of the CDQ allocations were affected by this proposed rule. Reduction fishery means the fishery
not considered in the calculation. The List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 600 for all crab rationalization crab,
collection of fees on CDQ crab landings excluding CDQ allocations, in all crab
would result in the repayment of fees Fisheries, Fishing capacity reduction,
Fishing permits, Fishing vessels. rationalization fisheries.
above what was expected for this year.
As a result of the additional revenue, Dated: February 24, 2006.
* * * * *
the buyback loan would be repaid William T. Hogarth, (h) * * *
slightly earlier than expected and would Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, (4) Fish buyers in each reduction
result in a slight decrease in the overall National Marine Fisheries Service. endorsement fishery shall in accordance
amount of interest accrued on the loan. For the reasons set out in the with § 600.1014, deposit and disburse,
Removal of the CDQ landings from the preamble, 50 CFR part 600 is proposed as well as keep records for and submit
fee assessment would not have a to be amended as follows: reports about, the fees applicable to
negative impact on the expectations of each such fishery; except the
the remaining BSAI crab harvesters PART 600—MAGNUSON-STEVENS
requirements specified under paragraph
since they were not expecting fee ACT PROVISIONS
(c) of this section concerning the deposit
payments from the CDQ landings based 1. The authority citation for part 600, principal disbursement shall be made to
on the fee calculations provided by Subpart M, continues to read as follows: NMFS not later than the 7th calendar
NMFS. Furthermore, the contributions day of each month; and the
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
from CDQ landings are relatively small requirements specified under paragraph
2. In § 600.1104, paragraph (b), the
compared to the overall reduction loan (e) of this section concerning annual
definition of ‘‘Reduction fishery’’ is
amount. The contributions from the reports which shall be submitted to
revised and paragraph (h)(4) is revised
CDQ crab landings would represent 10 NMFS by July 1 of each calendar year;
to read as follows:
percent of the total reduction loan and, * * *
amount. This proposed rule is necessary § 600.1104 Bering Sea and Aleutian
to ensure that recipients of CDQ crab are Islands (BSAI) crab species fee payment * * * * *
excluded from the requirement to pay and collection system. [FR Doc. E6–2892 Filed 2–28–06; 8:45 am]
fees on their BSAI crab landings. The * * * * * BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
erjones on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:37 Feb 28, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM 01MRP1

You might also like