Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ME TECHNICAL PAPER w
x
ABSTRACT
Introduction
1273
ME TECHNICAL PAPER w
x wavelet transform analysis
5000
4000
T(0,1)b
3000
T(0,1)c
T(0,2)c
2000
1000
0
Excitation zone
fT(0,2)c = 93.5 kHz
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Frequency (kHz)
(a)
U77
78
Ur
Uz
80
U
82
84
U86
86
-1
T(0,1)c, f = 21 kHz
(b)
78
Ur
80
Uz
U
82
84
86
-1
(c)
T(0,1)c, f = 32 kHz
1275
ME TECHNICAL PAPER w
x wavelet transform analysis
Wf ( a, b ) =
1
a
t b
f (t )
dt
a
where
(t) indicates a mother wavelet
* indicates its complex conjugation.
Wf (a,b) is a wavelet coefficient for the wavelet (t).
Wf (a,b) measures the variation of the signal when the time t
is equal to b. The higher the correlation between the
frequency of the wavelet and the frequency of the partial
signal, the larger the coefficient. A large value of scale stands
for a big window with a widespread view of the signal with
lower resolution; a small value of scale represents a small
window with a detailed view of the signal with more accurate
resolution. The continuous wavelet transform features the full
provision of the signal information and describes the energy
distribution of the signal over the time-scale domain.
(a)
Experiment
An experiment was designed to investigate the guided wavebased inspection technique for detecting the discontinuities of
the wall on a bitumen coated pipe.
(b)
Experimental Setup
(c)
Figure 2. (a) The guided wave testing system that was used;
(b) the schematic diagram of a typical guided wave testing
configuration; (c) the coordinate system to describe the axial
and circumferential location.
1276
TABLE 1
Axial location
(mm)
Circumferential
location ()
Circumferential
length (mm)
Depth
(mm)
Axial extent
(mm)
Cross-section
change
3500
4000
4500
4500
0
0
0
270
100
50
100
30
3.5
3.5
2
6
30
30
30
30
10%
5%
5%
5%
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Figure 3. The profile of test Pipe 1 and Pipe 2: (a) the transducer ring is mounted 1.5 m from End 1 on Pipe 1; (b) the
geometry parameters of the artificial discontinuity on Pipe 1;
(c) the transducer ring is mounted 3.24 m from End 3 on Pipe
2; (d) the geometry parameters of the natural discontinuity
on Pipe 2.
1277
ME TECHNICAL PAPER w
x wavelet transform analysis
End 3 to Weld 5 is a new pipe and the rest is the old one.
When the old bitumen coating was removed between Welds
5 and 6, three natural discontinuities (general corrosions),
labeled ND1, ND2 and ND3, with different dimensions were
revealed on the section. The depth parameter D of the natural
discontinuity is described in Figure 3d. The three natural
discontinuities on Pipe 2 were marked and photographed, as
shown in Figure 4. A profilometer was also used to measure
the depth on the chalked area for the discontinuity map of the
three natural discontinuities. As shown in Figure 4, the
discontinuity maps were plotted as a contour image from the
data measured by the profilometer. The horizontal axis of the
map indicates the axial location calculated from the middle of
the transducer ring position, and the vertical axis of the map
indicates the circumferential location around the pipe. Zero
degrees refers to the topmost point of the pipe. The color at
each point is associated with the measured depth, with the
lighter color corresponding to the greater depth, and the dark
color corresponding to the lesser one. The discontinuity maps
showed the variation of the wall thickness loss in the three
areas of ND1, ND2 and ND3. By comparing Figures 4a, 4b
and 4c, the ND1 with a maximum depth of 3.95 mm was
identified as severe corrosion, the ND2 with a maximum
depth of 2.39 mm was classified as minor corrosion and the
ND3 with maximum depth of 3.34 mm was classified as
medium corrosion.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 4. The discontinuity map measured by the profilometer. Results show the photo and map of (a) ND1; (b) ND2; (c) ND3.
1278
TABLE 2
0.0
21
1.0
24
2.0
27
3.0
30
4.0
34
1279
ME TECHNICAL PAPER w
x wavelet transform analysis
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
Figure 5. The reflected signals from various features on the 152.4 mm Pipe 1 and Pipe 2: (a) the complete signal of bare Pipe 1;
(b) the zoomed view of 5a; (c) the zoomed signal of bare Pipe 2; (d) the zoomed signal of coated Pipe 1; (e) the zoomed signal
of coated Pipe 2.
1280
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Figure 6. Variation of reflection ratio with the operating frequency regime: (a) each artificial discontinuity on bare Pipe 1;
(b) each natural discontinuity on bare Pipe 2; (c) each artificial discontinuity on coated Pipe 1; (d) each natural discontinuity on
coated Pipe 2.
1281
ME TECHNICAL PAPER w
x wavelet transform analysis
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Figure 7. The reflected signals from various features on the 152.4 mm coated pipe 2: (a) frequency regime = 1.0; (b) frequency
regime = 2.0; (c) frequency regime = 3.0; (d ) frequency regime = 4.0.
1282
(a)
(b)
The authors would like to acknowledge the support of this work by the
National Science Council of Taiwan under Grant No. NSC 97-2221-E110-029.
REFERENCES
1283
ME TECHNICAL PAPER w
x wavelet transform analysis
Alleyne, D. N., T. Vogt and P. Cawley, The Choice of Torsional or Longitudinal Excitation in Guided Wave Pipe Inspection, Insight, Vol. 51, No. 7,
July 2009, pp. 373377.
Barshinger, J. N. and J. L. Rose, Guided Wave Propagation in an Elastic
Hollow Cylinder Coated with a Viscoelastic Material, IEEE Transactions
on UFFC, Vol. 51, No. 11, November 2004, pp. 15471556.
Cawley, P., M. J. S. Lowe, D. N. Alleyne, B. Pavlakovic and P. Wilcox,
Practical Long Range Guided Wave Testing: Applications to Pipes and
Rail, Materials Evaluation, Vol. 61, No. 1, January 2003, pp. 6674.
Cheng, J. W., S. K. Yang and B. H. Li, Torsional Guided Wave Attenuation in Buried Pipe, Materials Evaluation, Vol. 64, No. 4, April 2006,
pp. 412416.
Demma, A., D. N. Alleyne and B. Pavlakovic, Testing of Buried Pipelines
Using Guided Waves, Third Middle East Non-Destructive Testing Conference and Exhibition, Manama, Bahrain, 2730 November 2005.
Demma, A., P. Cawley, M. J. S. Lowe and A. G. Roosenbrand, The Reflection of the Fundamental Torsional Mode from Cracks and Notches in
Pipes, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 114, No. 2, August
2003, pp. 611625.
Demma, A., P. Cawley, M. J. S. Lowe, A. G. Roosenbrand and B.
Pavlakovic, The Reflection of Guided Waves from Notches in Pipes: a
Guide for Interpreting Corrosion Measurements, NDT & E International,
Vol. 37, No. 2, April 2004, pp. 167180.
Rose, J. L., D. Jiao and J. Spanner, Ultrasonic Guided Wave NDE for
Piping, Materials Evaluation, Vol. 54, No. 11, November 1996,
pp. 13101313.
Guided Ultrasonics, Ltd., Wavemark G3 Procedure Based Inspector Training
Manual, Version 1.0, Guided Ultrasonics, Ltd., Nottingham, England,
2005.
Leymarie, N. and S. Baste, Guided Waves and Ultrasonic Characterization
of Three-dimensional Composites, Review of Progress in Quantitative
Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 19, New York, Plenum, May 2000,
pp. 11751182.
Marzani, A., E. Viola, I. Bartoli, F. Lanza di Scalea and P. Rizzo, A Semianalytical Finite Element Formulation for Modeling Stress Wave Propagation in Axisymmetric Damped Waveguides, Journal of Sound and
Vibration, Vol. 318, No. 3, 2008, pp. 488505.
1284
Mu, J. and J. L. Rose, Guided Wave Propagation and Mode Differentiation in Hollow Cylinders with Viscoelastic Coatings, Journal of the
Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 124, No. 2, 2008, pp. 866874.
Mudge, P. J., Field Application of the Teletest Long Range Ultrasonic
Testing Technique, Insight, Vol. 43, No. 2, February 2001, pp. 7477.
Nunez Ledesma, V. M., E. Perez Baruch, A. Demma, and M. J. S. Lowe,
Guided Wave Testing of an Immersed Gas Pipeline, Materials Evaluation,
Vol. 67, No. 2, February 2009, pp. 102115.
Onsay, T. and A. G. Haddow, Wavelet Transform Analysis of Transient
Wave Propagation in a Dispersive Medium, Journal of the Acoustical Society
of America, Vol. 95, No. 3, 1994, pp. 14411449.
Pavlakovic, B., M. J. S. Lowe, D. N. Alleyne and P. Cawley, Disperse: A
General Purpose Program for Creating Dispersion Curves, Review of
Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 16, New York,
Plenum, 1997, pp. 185192.
Rizzo, P., I. Bartoli, A. Marzani, and F. Lanza di Scalea, Defect Classification in Pipes by Neural Networks Using Multiple Guided Ultrasonic Wave
Features Extracted After Wavelet Processing, Journal of Pressure Vessel
Technology, Vol. 127, No. 3, 2005, pp. 294303.
Simonetti, F., Lamb Wave Propagation in Elastic Plates Coated with
Viscoelastic Materials, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 115,
No. 52, 2004, pp. 20412053.
Simonetti, F. and P. Cawley, A Guided Wave Technique for the Characterization of Highly Attenuative Viscoelastic Materials, Journal of the
Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 114, No. 1, July 2003, pp. 158165.
Simonetti, F. and P. Cawley, On the Nature of Shear Horizontal Wave
Propagation in Elastic Plates Coated with Viscoelastic Materials, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, Vol. 460, No. 2048, 8 August 2004,
pp. 21972221.
Siqueira, M. H. S., C. E. N. Gatts, R. R. da Silva and J. M. A. Rebello, The
Use of Guided Waves and Wavelets Analysis in Pipe Inspection, Ultrasonics, Vol. 41, No. 10, May 2004, pp. 785797.
Yang, W. X., A Natural Way for Improving the Accuracy of the Continuous Wavelet Transforms, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 306,
September 2007, pp. 928939.