You are on page 1of 2

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

4 / Friday, January 6, 2006 / Notices 957

should be submitted on or before proposed rule change is available on February 2, 2004 and was amended
January 27, 2006. CBOE’s Web site, http://www.cboe.com, twice.8 The Linkage Fees Credit is a
For the Commission, by the Division of at CBOE’s principal office, and at the program that credits DPMs for
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated Commission’s Public Reference Room. transaction fees they incur related to the
authority.12 execution of outbound P/A orders, as
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Jonathan G. Katz, defined in the Plan for the Purpose of
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Secretary. Creating and Operating an Intermarket
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Option Linkage, to assist DPMs in
[FR Doc. E6–19 Filed 1–5–06; 8:45 am] Change
offsetting the additional costs they incur
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P In its filing with the Commission, in routing orders to other exchanges in
CBOE included statements concerning order to obtain the National Best Bid or
the purpose of and basis for the Offer. The Exchange will determine as
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE proposed rule change and discussed any
COMMISSION part of its annual budget review process
comments it received on the proposal. whether the Linkage Fees Credit should
[Release No. 34–53044; File No. SR–CBOE– The text of these statements may be be continued, modified or eliminated in
2005–114] examined at the places specified in Item the future. Any proposed changes to the
IV below. The Exchange has prepared Linkage Fees Credit would be filed with
Self-Regulatory Organizations; summaries, set forth in sections A, B, the Commission.
Chicago Board Options Exchange, and C below, of the most significant
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and aspects of such statements. 2. Statutory Basis
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed The Exchange believes that the
Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
proposed rule change is consistent with
Thereto Relating to Extension of the Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Section 6(b) of the Act 9 in general, and
Prospective Fee Reduction and DPM Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4)
Change
Linkage Fee Credit Programs of the Act 10 in particular, in that it is
1. Purpose designed to provide for the equitable
December 30, 2005.
The Exchange proposes to extend two allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the other charges among its members.
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Exchange-fee related programs through
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 the end of January 2006: The B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
notice is hereby given that on December Prospective Fee Reduction Program and Statement on Burden on Competition
16, 2005, the Chicago Board Options the DPM Linkage Fees Credit Program.6
CBOE believes that the proposed rule
Exchange, Incorporated (‘‘CBOE’’ or Each program is currently due to expire
change would impose no burden on
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities at the end of 2005. The Exchange has
competition that is not necessary or
and Exchange Commission determined to extend each of these
appropriate in furtherance of the
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule programs for an additional month
purposes of the Act.
change as described in Items I, II, and because the Exchange’s 2006 budget is
expected to be approved in January C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
III below, which Items have been
2006. Statement on Comments on the
prepared by the Exchange. On December
Prospective Fee Reduction Program. Proposed Rule Change Received From
22, 2005, CBOE filed Amendment No. 1 The Exchange proposes to continue the Members, Participants or Others
to the proposed rule change.3 CBOE has Prospective Fee Reduction Program
designated this proposal as one CBOE did not solicit or receive any
(‘‘PFRP’’) through January 31, 2006. No written comments with respect to the
establishing or changing a due, fee, or other changes to the PFRP are proposed.
other charge imposed by a self- proposal.
The current PFRP took effect on August
regulatory organization pursuant to 1, 2004.7 The PFRP is intended to III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act,4 and Rule reduce Market-Maker and DPM Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,5 which renders transaction fees in periods of high Commission Action
the proposal effective upon filing with volume. The Exchange will determine
the Commission. The Commission is The foregoing proposed rule change
as part of its annual budget review has been designated as a fee change
publishing this notice to solicit process whether the PFRP should be
comments on the proposed rule change, pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the
continued, modified or eliminated in Act 11 and Rule 19b–4(f)(2) 12
as amended, from interested persons. the future. Any proposed changes to the thereunder. Accordingly, the proposal is
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s PFRP would be filed with the effective upon filing with the
Statement of the Terms of Substance of Commission. Commission. At any time within 60
the Proposed Rule Change DPM Linkage Fees Credit Program. days of the filing of the proposed rule
The Exchange proposes to continue the change, the Commission may summarily
CBOE proposes to amend its Fees DPM Linkage Fees Credit Program
Schedule to extend through January 31, abrogate such rule change if it appears
(‘‘Linkage Fees Credit’’) through January to the Commission that such action is
2006 the Prospective Fee Reduction 31, 2006. No other changes to the
Program and the DPM Linkage Fees necessary or appropriate in the public
Linkage Fees Credit are proposed. The
Credit Program. The text of the Linkage Fees Credit took effect on 8 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 49341

(March 1, 2004), 69 FR 10492 (March 5, 2004) (SR–


12 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

6 See Sections 19 and 21 of the CBOE Fees CBOE–2004–08); 49769 (May 25, 2004), 69 FR
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). Schedule, respectively. 31145 (June 2, 2004) (SR–CBOE–2004–13); and
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50175 52660 (October 24, 2005), 70 FR 62355 (October 31,
3 In Amendment No. 1, CBOE deleted all 2005) (SR–CBOE–2005–80).
(August 10, 2004), 69 FR 51129 (August 17, 2004) 9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
references to an extension of the Fixed Annual Fee (SR–CBOE–2004–38). See also Securities Exchange
Program. Act Release No. 52111 (July 22, 2005), 70 FR 43729
10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 11 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
(July 28, 2005) (SR–CBOE–2005–52) (extension of
5 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). PFRP through the end of 2005). 12 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:23 Jan 05, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM 06JAN1
958 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 4 / Friday, January 6, 2006 / Notices

interest, for the protection of investors, submissions should refer to File II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
or otherwise in furtherance of the Number SR–CBOE–2005–114 and Statement of the Purpose of, and
purposes of the Act.13 should be submitted on or before Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
January 27, 2006. Change
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to For the Commission, by the Division of In its filing with the Commission, the
submit written data, views, and Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated Exchange included statements
arguments concerning the foregoing, authority.14 concerning the purpose of, and basis for,
including whether the proposed rule Jonathan G. Katz, the proposed rule change and discussed
change, as amended, is consistent with Secretary. any comments it received on the
the Act. Comments may be submitted by [FR Doc. E6–22 Filed 1–5–06; 8:45 am] proposed rule change. The text of these
any of the following methods: statements may be examined at the
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
places specified in Item IV below. The
Electronic Comments Exchange has prepared summaries, set
• Use the Commission’s Internet forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ the most significant aspects of such
rules/sro.shtml); or COMMISSION
statements.
• Send an e-mail to rule-
comments@sec.gov. Please include File [Release No. 34–53045; File No. SR–PCX– A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Number SR–CBOE–2005–114 on the 2005–132] Statement of the Purpose of, and
subject line. Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Pacific Change
Paper Comments Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and 1. Purpose
• Send paper comments in triplicate Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Rule Change Relating to Obligations of The purpose of this filing is to delete
Securities and Exchange Commission, Lead Market Makers PCX Rule 6.82(c)(15), a sub–paragraph
Station Place, 100 F Street NE., of Obligations of Lead Market Makers.
Washington, DC 20549–9303. December 30, 2005. Along with the deletion of PCX Rule
All submissions should refer to File Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 6.82(c)(15), the PCX proposes to amend
Number SR–CBOE–2005–114. This file Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Commentary .02 to PCX Rule 6.82,
number should be included on the (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 which addresses PCX Rule 6.82(c)(15).
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the This rule, dealing with the handling of
notice is hereby given that on December
Commission process and review your public customer orders that are not
30, 2005, the Pacific Exchange, Inc.
comments more efficiently, please use automatically executed on the PCX
(‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘PCX’’) filed with the
only one method. The Commission will because there is a better-displayed bid
Securities and Exchange Commission or offer on another exchange, is
post all comments on the Commission’s
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule scheduled to be operative on January 1,
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the change as described in Items I and II 2006.
submission, all subsequent below, which Items have been Under PCX Rule 6.82(c)(15), when a
amendments, all written statements substantially prepared by the Exchange. public customer order is not
with respect to the proposed rule The Exchange filed the proposed rule automatically executed on the PCX due
change that are filed with the change as a ‘‘non-controversial’’ rule to a better bid or ask price being
Commission, and all written change under Rule 19b–4(f)(6) under the displayed on another exchange, a Lead
communications relating to the Act,3 which rendered the proposal Market Maker (‘‘LMM’’) is obligated, as
proposed rule change between the effective upon filing with the soon as practical, to address the order
Commission and any person, other than Commission. The Commission is by either executing the public customer
those that may be withheld from the publishing this notice to solicit order at a price that matches the best
public in accordance with the comments on the proposed rule change available price displayed at any other
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be from interested persons. exchange or by routing the public
available for inspection and copying in customer order via intermarket linkage
the Commission’s Public Reference I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
(‘‘Linkage’’) for execution at any other
Room. Copies of such filing also will be Statement of the Terms of Substance of exchange displaying the best price in
available for inspection and copying at the Proposed Rule Change the market at the time. Outbound
the principal office of the Exchange. All Linkage orders on the PCX are still
The Exchange proposes to delete PCX
comments received will be posted handled via manual interaction with the
Rule 6.82(c)(15) in its entirety. The
without change; the Commission does Linkage system. Manual interaction
not edit personal identifying Exchange also proposes to amend
with the Linkage system can be a time
information from submissions. You Commentary .02 to PCX Rule 6.82. The
consuming process that potentially
should submit only information that text of the proposed rule change is
could result in the delay of a public
you wish to make available publicly. All available on PCX’s Web site, http:// customer order being executed at a
www.pacificex.com, at PCX’s Office of better price available at a competing
13 The effective date of the original proposed rule the Secretary, and at the Commission’s exchange. By deleting PCX Rule
change is December 16, 2005, and the effective date Public Reference Section. 6.82(c)(15), in the event that an LMM
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

of Amendment No. 1 is December 22, 2005. For


purposes of calculating the 60-day period within does not execute the order at the better
which the Commission may summarily abrogate the price displayed on another exchange,
proposed rule change, as amended, under Section 14 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). the LMM would not be required to send
19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, the Commission considers
the period to commence on December 22, 2005, the
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). the order to the competing exchange via
date on which CBOE submitted Amendment No. 1.
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. Linkage. Public customer orders that are
See 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C). 3 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). not executed on the PCX could still be

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:23 Jan 05, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM 06JAN1

You might also like