Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Capacity Building
Wayne Seidel
July 1, 2009
This project was funded in part under the Coastal Zone Management Act, by NOAA’s
Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, in cooperation with Minnesota’s
Lake Superior Coastal Program.
Introduction
The Lake County SWCD requested $5,400 in Coastal Nonpoint funding to implement
projects and build District capacity. The District used the funding to assist in
implementing Minnesota’s Lake Superior Coastal Nonpoint Pollution Control Program
by providing engineering, educational, and technical assistance in Lake County. Specific
projects included increased technical assistance to solve erosion problems, participation
in natural resource issue-based meetings, assistance in planning and conducting the North
Shore Erosion Forum, and having District Supervisors serve on state-wide and regional
natural resources planning efforts.
Proposed Work
Listed below is a detailed compilation of the proposed projects.
Urban / Rural:
1. Provide site reviews on land disturbing projects to assess compliance with erosion
and sediment control ordinances (private property owners, local units of
government).
2. Assist the Lake County Planning Commission on land use issues related to water
quality such as erosion and sediment control, storm water management, and
wetlands conservation.
3. Work with Cities, Townships, and County on erosion and sediment control
measures.
4. Provide assistance in revising the Lake County Land Use Ordinance, notably the
provisions on storm water management and erosion control.
5. Participate on the Arrowhead Water Quality Team to develop educational
materials and programs on water quality used throughout northeastern Minnesota.
6. Assist with implementation of the Two Harbors Storm Water Management Plan.
7. Assist the CCLNS Joint Powers Board Engineer with site reviews, assessment
summaries, and project planning on erosion control projects.
Forestry:
1. Provide landowner contacts for CCLNS Forester.
2. Have SWCD Supervisors participate on Laurentian RC&D Committee,
Wetland Conservation:
Ordinance.
SWCD Supervisors:
Lake County SWCD Supervisors served on a host of regional and state-wide planning
efforts including Laurentian RC&D Committee, Minnesota Forestry Committee, CCLNS
Joint Powers Board, and the Lake County Water Plan Advisory Committee. These are
typically bi-monthly meetings and the Supervisors provide a report on recent committee
activities at each SWCD meeting.
North Shore Erosion Forum:
Helped plan and conduct a one-day North Shore Erosion Forum held in Two Harbors on
June 18, 2009. Approximately thirty local decision-makers participated in the morning
session that included presentations on the Challenges of Erosion Control in Northern
Minnesota, Storm Water Management, and the Cook County Storm Water Ordinance.
Twenty-three people participated in a three-hour afternoon tour that featured successful
projects on shoreline stabilization and storm water management. The forum was
sponsored by the North Shore Management Board.
* See the attached narratives and other supporting materials for specific project details.
Conclusions
This project was effective in enhancing the technical assistance provided by District staff,
increasing the leadership capacity of District Supervisors to work on a regional and
statewide basis, and to develop new land use management tools for Lake County.
Minnesota's La ke Superior Coastal Progra m Project Number: 3 10-05-08
Contract Number: B1 6370
Progress Report Date Received by MLSCP :
Project Title: Lake County SWCD Program Imp lementati on / Capacity Building
Name & Tille of Person Completing Report Wayne Seidel, Project Manager
1. Thoroughly discuss progress made during this reporting period , ci ting specific
tasks li sted in contract scope of services.
The project is now underway and a toloal of 81 hours were logged on a vari ety of
projects incl uding those listed below:
2. Identify and di scuss any problems or concems (issues or project implementation and
adm ini strati on).
None
Name & Title of Person Completing Report Wayne Seidel, Project lanager
1. Thoroughly discuss progress made dnring this reporting pet-iod, citing specific
tasks I isted in contract scope of services_
The proj ect is now wlderway and a total of 147.5 hours were logged on a variety of
projects including those li sted below:
2. Parti cipated in the following natural resource issued-based meetings: Forestry Focus
Group Interview (University of Minnesota), Lake County SWCD, MASWCD State
Convention.
2. Identify and di scuss any problems or concerns (issues or proj ect implementation and
adm ini stration).
None
Nmlle & Title of Person Comp leting Report Wayne Seidel, Project Manager
1. Thoroughl y discuss progress made during this repo,·ting period , citing specific
tasks listed in contract scope of services.
A total of 24.5 additional homs were logged on a vm'iety of projects including those listed
bel ow:
1. Field Reviews/Requests for info rmation - Conducted 14 reviews and/or requests for
inform ation on proposed developments, erosion problems, wetlmld monitoring plans,
wetland restoration plans, and land use violations (wetlands). This included work on two
cun'ent erosion control projects utili zing District Cost-Share funding and fi ve potential
cost-share proj ects. I also revised om Erosion & Sediment Control P lan Checkli st for use
with the revised Lake County Stonn Water Ordinance.
2. Identify and discuss any problems or concerns (issues or project implementation and
adm ini stratio n) .
None
Minnesota’s Lake Superior Coastal Program Project Number: 310-05-08
Contract Number: B16370
Progress Report Date Received by MLSCP:
Name & Title of Person Completing Report Wayne Seidel, Project Manager
1. Thoroughly discuss progress made during this reporting period, citing specific
tasks listed in contract scope of services.
A total of 112 additional hours were logged on a variety of projects including those listed
below:
4. Led a process to hire a Lake County Volunteer to conduct the Beach Water Quality
Monitoring Project for the Lake County Health Department. The volunteer takes water
quality samples once a week from May through August.
5. Completed the Non-Point Grant Final Quarterly Progress Report and the Final Report.
2. Identify and discuss any problems or concerns (issues or project implementation and
administration).
None
#B16370
Expense Summary
Wayne Seidel – Conservation Specialist - Per contract with the University of Minnesota
Extension Service that includes salary, travel/meal expenses, and benefits in hourly figure
= $42.50 / hour.
A total of 287.5 hours were expended on this Non-Point Grant project as detailed by the
following time log for Wayne Seidel from July 16, 2008 – June 30, 2009.
2008
2009
Activities
Representati ve, has secured the services of Krech & Ojard Engi neers to provide
site superv ision during construction.
S. Derek McCorison - Provided resource information on a prospective land purchase
- wetlands, access, utilities - along with a copy of the Lake County Property
Owner' s Resource Guide.
6. Go lf Course Erosion Control Project I Courthouse Park.ing Lot - Participated in
an August 1 41h meeting to finalize construction plans on the golf course and to
provide design input on the new Courthouse parking lot.
7. Kane Lake Gravel Pit - Participated in a TEP meeting on July 29 1h to review a
potential wetland replacement site.
8. Provided information on critical area stabilization to Kelly Faughnan.
9. Field inspected a shoreline erosion problem near Castle Danger with Peter and
Charlette Malechi .
Miscellaneous:
1. Completed the 2007 Non-Point Grant Final Progress Report and the Di strict has
since received the funding.
2. The Water Plan Advisory Committee met on July 1 7'h and received an update on
projects completed to date. The meeting included a presentation by Nate Meyer,
Un iversity of Minnesota Extens ion, on the Field Day Research Project conducted
1h
in Lake County. The next meeting will be October 7 •
3. 1 pal1icipated in a Coastal Program Evaluation Meeting on August 51h to eva luate
the effectiveness of the Coastal Program . I provided information on how the
Coastal Program has assisted our effo l1s to develop the Lake County
Demonstration Forest, initi ate Storm Water Management Planning &
Implementation in Two Harbors, revise the Property Owner' s Guide, and provide
technical assistance to Lake County residents.
4. David Falk and I met with the Lake County Board on July 29 1h to review the
District 2009 Budget Request. We shared additional information and photos of
the recently completed Skunk Creek Project.
5. Participated in the Arrowhead Water Quality Team meeting on July 21 st.
6. Prepared the SWCD county fair displays .
7. Contacted Wayne Zellmer and Dan Steward, BWSR. regarding the Lake County
local levy (15% increase ) and inquired about the possibili ty of using cost-share
funds on an upcoming storm water management project.
8. Participated in the August 51h Depar1ment Head meeting and shared information
on the comp leted Skunk Creek. project.
9. Good News ... Itasca County completed their " Northwood' s Guide for Propeli)'
Owners in Itasca County". Their guide used the Lake County PORG as a
template.
Monthly Narrative -September 11,2008
Activities
Silver Creek Township completed the streambank stabilization project on Crow Creek. A
new concrete box culvert has replaced the under-sized corrugated metal pipe and the
streambank has been armored with rock rip-rap. All disturbed areas have been re-seeded
and covered with erosion control blankets. The cost-share contract and invoice support
materials will be processed in October.
Demonstration Forest Update: Our first Pavilion Planning Committee meeting was
held on August 27'h and we made good progress on brainstorming ideas for the new
pavilion. Wayne Dahlberg will prepare concept design drawings for review at our next
meeting scheduled for September 30 th . Note: I wi ll be bringing the Lake County
Extension Committee out for a site visit on September 16th
Ruth and I prepared and set up the display booth at the Lake County Fair. Our display
featured our Lake County SWCD display (staff, purpose, accomplishments, major
programs) plus individual display boards highlighting the following projects: Skunk
Creek Streambank Stabilization Project & Lake County Demonstration Forest.
Note: The Skunk Creek Photos are currently on display in the Courthouse lobby.
Matt Huddleston, Walt VanDenHeuvel and I met with Russ Huseby on September 4th
to field inspect his property south of Lax Lake. We reviewed an Administrative
Subdivision Application and then walked the property. On the largest wetland impact
area, Russ has burned all of the windrowed trees, done additional clearing on adjacent
upland property, used a dozer to move soil and wood ashes, and disced the entire
cleared area. On the north edge of the property, the wetland impact area has been
rock raked and the woody debris removed. The Wetland Restoration Plan has not
been completed.
Miscellaneous:
1. Participated in the September 2nd Department Head meeting.
2. Water Plan Advisory Committee - The next meeting will be on October 14th and
will include a 45 -minute presentation on the proposed Polymet Mining Project
near Babbitt. Meeting materials were sent out on August 28 th and additional
agenda items include updates on: Demonstration Forest, Coastal Program
Evaluation Team, Lake County Volunteer, Extension Annual Conference Storm
Water Tour (10/21).
3. Good News -Itasca County completed their "Northwood ' s Guide for Property
Owners in Itasca County" and Crow Wing County competed their "Lake
Stewardship Guide." Both were modeled after the Lake County Property Guide.
Monthly Narrative - October 9, 2008
Activities
Miscellaneous:
I. Participated in the CCLN S Joint Powers Board meeting on September 16'h
2. Pm1icipated in the Area III MASWCD Meeting in Mi lle Lacs County on
September 24-25 . We had a follo w-up meeting on September 25,h to di scuss the
merging of the two JPB work areas within Area Ill.
3. Started planning the 2009 Contractors Workshop with Jolm Chapman. Universi ty
of Minnesota. We are tentatively plmming for late-April to mid-May.
4. AEOA requested 50 copies of our Property Owner' s Guide for use in meetings
with new homeowners. They were aware of the Cook County booklet as well and
would like to see one put together for St. Loui s County.
5. Provided information to local 8'h grade teachers on a FREE Groundwater
Education Program Opportunity. The offer is from the Science M useum of
Milmesota in pm1nership with the Milmesota Association of SWCDs.
6. Sent MPCA Grant information on Water Quality Monitoring to Ray Doran, White
[ron Chain of Lakes Assoc iation.
7. Drafted a letter of support for the Emerald Ash Borer Training conducted by
University Extension this past spring (award nomination).
Monthly Narrative - November 6, 2008
Activities
Great News! The Science Museum of Minnesota and the MN Association ofSWCDs
are jointly sponsoring a series of 50 days of classroom education training (statewide) on
groundwater for 8th grade students. We applied and received word that our application
for the FREE Groundwater Education Programs for earth science students was accepted.
Lake County received one day for Two Harbors and one day for Silver Bay. The material
is especially important because the students will learn how groundwater moves through
rock via a multi-media presentation and hands-on activities.
1. Two Harbors Golf Course - The Lake County Highway Department assisted the
City of Two Harbors Public Works Department in completing the gully
stabilization project. Construction has been completed and the Cost-Share
Voucher is ready for approval.
2. Old Two Harbors Dump Site - Critical Area Stabilization. Construction has been
completed and the Cost-Share Voucher is ready for approval.
3. Tim & Karen Erickson (Gooseberry Cabins) - All permits except the DNR
Waters Permit have been approved. The project is slated to be completed this fall.
4. Silver Creek Township - Streambank Stabilization on Crow Creek. Construction
has been completed and the Cost-Share Voucher is ready for approval.
5. Clay Nicles - The Lake Superior shoreline stabilization project completion
deadline has been extended to June II , 2009.
6. Pat & Nancy Harvey - The Beaver River stream bank stabilization project is slated
for construction in 2009.
Clean Water Partnership Grant - WICOLA:
The White Iron Chain of Lakes Association will be applying for Clean Water Partnership
funds to expand their water quality monitoring program. They wi ll need a local sponsor
to administer the grant and have requested that either Lake County or the Lake County
Soil & Water Conservation District consider this role.
2009 ENVIROTHON:
The 2009 ENVIROTHO will be held at Camp Chicagami near Eveleth on Monday,
May 4th I will continue to coordinate the Wildlife Station (fi ve presenters) for both the
northern and southern E VIROTHON Competitions in Area III. Preliminary information
has been sent to Team Advisors Penny Juenemann, Two Harbors, and Mike Casper,
Silver Bay.
Miscellaneous:
I . Completed and submitted the Non-Point Grant Progress Report.
2. Pal1icipated in the Extension Fall Program Conference held at the DECC on
October 20-22. The conference included a poster session where Nate Meyer, Barb
Liukkonen and I displayed the poster and shared the results of the Lake County
Natural Resources Field Day Study.
3. Lake County PlalUling & Zoning submitted a STAR Grant proposal to augment
our Clean Water Legacy funding for improving the storm water management
provisions in the Lake County Land Use Ordinance.
4. Provided additional copies of the Lake County Property Owner's Guide to the
Silver Bay Library and Silver Bay City Hall.
Monthly Narrative - December 11,2008
Activities
Lake County 8th grade students recently had the opportunity to learn more about
groundwater thanks to ajoint effort between the Lake County SWCD, the Science
Museum of Minnesota and the Lake Superior School District. The Science Museum
provided six FREE presentations - two in Silver Bay and four in Two Harbors. The
students learned how groundwater is stored in rocks; how it moves; how it is connected to
lakes, rivers and wells; and most importantly, about the importance of keeping our
groundwater clean from contamination. Much to the students delight, they had the chance
to use groundwater simulator models to learn how groundwater levels change with
rainfall and pumping wells. This "hands on" activity also showed them how susceptible
groundwater is to contamination. Using colored dyes they simulated a diesel fuel spill
and observed how contaminants move in the groundwater. Thanks to the help of 8th
grade teachers Ed Walker and Tony Altiere, the students now have a better understanding
of groundwater and the importance of keeping our drinking water clean.
5. Steve Bartz, DNR - sent a seed mix and copy of the E & S Control Plan template.
Demonstration Forest Update: We have received the final plans of the proposed
Demonstration Forest Pavilion from Wayne Dahlberg, Architect. He did an excellent job
and we will continue to pursue funding for construction.
Plmm ing continues and we have the oral presentation judges and presenters fin ali zed.
Area III also received a $500 donation from Minnesota Energy. The next plann ing
Miscellaneous:
I. Met with our new BWSR Board Conservationi st, Ryan Hughes, on December 2 nd
Ryan was accompanied by Ron Shelito and Dan Steward , BWSR staff. Ruth and I
shared information about the Lake SWC D to familiari ze Ryan with our proj ects. past
successes mld provided an overview of our Di strict Board and Staff.
2. Used Vacation and Fl ex time in November.
3. Rece ived final payment of $25,000 from the Great Lakes Commi ssion for the Skunk
Creek Streambank Stabilization Project.
4. Met with Tom Martinson. prospective SWCD Supervisor, to exp lai n the duties and
responsibilities of this elected position.
5. Wrote a letter of support fo r the Sugarloaf - I orth Shore Stewardshi p Associ at ion
regarding thei r Coastal Grant application to prov ide local workshops on terrestrial
invasive spec ies educat ion.
Monthly Narrative - January 8, 2009
Activities
Note: My wife, Karen, has been in St. Mal)" s hospital with a serious blood infection
since Janua ry l SI. They have iso lated the strep bacteria and she is currently
undergoing treatment with antibiotics. The ordeal has been extremely painful for
Karen but we are trusting God for a complete healing. Due to this situation, I will
not be attending the January Stll meeting.
Miscellaneous:
I. Received my new office computer thanks to assistance from the Information Systems
Department (set-up and new software installation). I allocated $1200 from the
Extension budget combined with $316.13 from the Lake County Soil & Water
Conservation District to fund the computer purchase.
2. Tom Gelineau and I participated in a focus group interview in Hibbing on December
16th for the Tree Inspector Program. The University of Minnesota conducts the
training for this statewide program and needed input on current community needs. I
invited Tom to join me for the interview because he serves as the Public Works
Director for Two Harbors and has a passionate interest in urban forest management.
Prior to the interview I also contacted Swede Larson, Silver Bay Street
Superintendant, to get his perspective on important tree management issues.
3. Submitted the photo of Brenda VanBergen with the SWCD Board to the Lake
County News Chronicle.
4. Good News! Funding for the Lake County Soil Survey is on the "Recommended
List" from the Legislative Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources (LCCMR).
Lake County is currently working with NRCS to determine if the in-kind offer of
work space in Silver Bay is still needed by the soil survey crew.
5. Completed my 2008 Self-Assessment and 2009 Extension Plan of Work.
6. Completed and submitted the Non-Point Grant Progress Report for September
December.
Monthly Narrative - February 5, 2009
Activities
*Thank you for all of yo ur thou ghts and prayers for my wife, Karen, this past
month. She is now home and doing well after a 14-day hospital stay. Her left wrist
and hand arc still very painful but we count our blessings daily - for hea lth, family,
go od friends , and a loving God.
2009 ENVIROTHON:
Regi stration information has been sent to teachers at William Kelley High SchooL Two
Harbors High School and Lakeview Clu-i stian Academy regarding this year's
ENVIROTHO . I have also begun working with my four co-presenters for the Wildlife
Station . We will have tbe Wi ldlife Station Test completed by the end of February.
Miscellaneous:
I. Met wi th Jim Pinkney and Larry Squillace on February 2 nd to di sc uss the WICOLA
Clean Water Partnership Grant Request. Fo llow-up conversation with Nolan
Baratono, MPCA, on grant administration procedures.
2. Reviewed the Cost-Share Audit results with Ryan Hughes, BWSR Board
Conservationist. Overall we are doing well but need to begin imp lementi ng a new
B WSR requirement - field inspections of comp leted projects on a scheduled basi s.
3. Good ews! The Lake Co unty Board approved our 2009 budget request - $38,630.
4. I have begun planning for the 2009 Natural Resources Fi eld Day. The Field Day will
be held on Thursday, May 2 1st at Split Rock Lighthouse State Park.
5. Reviewed the amended Joint Powers Board Agreement.
Monthly Narrative - March 5, 2009
Activities
M iscellan eous :
I . Delivered the final report for the Demonstrati on Forest Pavi lion Plmming Project to
the DNR Coastal Program Office.
2. Participated in the March 3'd Department Head Meeting.
3. I sent the proposed Joint Powers Board Agreement to Russ COIU-OW, Lake County
4. Reviewed the Laurentian RC&D Annual Plan of Work at the request of Paul
Sandstrom.
Activities
Demonstration Forest:
l . The Demonstration Forest Committee met on March 3 1st to discuss the pavilion
project, trail maintenance, educational offerings, and D R Habitat Proj ect
proposals. We have received information on a potential donor for the pavilion
proj ect through Les Olilla, D R Trails @ Grand Rapids. If the group is interested
in our project, we will have a site visit this spring/summer. We also began putting
together courses that we could offer to elementary and secondary students. These
may include forestry (p lanting, bud-capping, pruning), orienteering (compass
skills, pacing, geo-caching), wildlife sign, and hi story. We also proposed six
potential projects for the D R to consider doing at the Demonstration Forest.
These included constructing wildli fe openings, planting fruiting trees & shrubs,
installing wood duck nesting boxes, and conducting wildlife research .
2. Met with the County Board on April 7'h to review fou r items.
a. Membership on the Demon stration Forest ConU11ittee - Rich Sve (Brad
Jones - Alternate)
b. Update on the Pavilion Project (potential donor) .
c. Request establi shment of a Pavili on Donation Fund - The Board is in
supp0l1 of establi shing this fund .
d. Recommend addition of two 40-acre parcel s to the Demonstration Forest
The Board will consider thi s item at their action meeting on April1 4'h
3. The next Demonstration Forest meeting will be held on April 28'h and we have a
Work Day set for April 30'h to conduct trail and restroom maintenance.
2009 ENVIROTHON:
We now have thirty-three teams regi stered for the Torthern ENV IROTHON that will be
held at Camp Chicagami near Eve leth on May 4'h This includes three teams from Two
Harbors.
Miscellaneous:
I. P8.l~icipated in the April 7'h Department Head Meeti ng.
2. Russ Co nrow, Lake Cou nty Attorney, provided feedback on the proposed Joint
Powers Board Agreement. He offered recommendations on insurance provisions and
membership.
3. Met with Mary Mjelde, Lake County Information Systems, to receive training on
updating the Lake County SWCD web page. J added a number of before and after
4. We received word that the Skunk Creek Watershed Project did not recei ve an award
from the MiIUlesota Environmental Initiative Organization. The Wimllng entries
were outstanding. See letter for wilUling projects.
5. Nathan Sclu'oeder will be our featured presenter at the June 91h Water Plan Advisory
Comm ittee meeting. Nathan will provide an update on the Knife Ri ver TMDL
Proj ect.
6. Palticipated in the Gypsy Moth Open House held on March 18 1h at the Courthouse.
The program was hosted by the Minnesota Dept. of Agriculture and included
submitted the quarterl y Progress Report to DNR for the Ion-Point Grant.
9. Continued preparation for the 2009 Natural Resources Field Day on May 2 1st. Jesse
Schomberg, Sea Grant Extension, will be a new presenter and will be co-presenting
the Lake Superior Game with me. I' ve also deve loped an evaluation tool to use with
the students.
Monthly Narrative - May 14,2009
Activities
2009 ENVIROTHON:
Twenty-eight teams competed in the 2009 ENVIROTHON held at Camp Chicagami near
Eveleth on May 4th The three teams from Two Harbors placed 1st, 3'd and in a tie for
th
6 ! The top three teams will go on to the State ENVIROTHON Competition to be held
in Stewartville on May 18th I coordinated the Wildlife Station along with four Wildlife
Biologists.
Demonstration Forest:
1. The Demonstration Forest Committee met on April2S th to review potential
education activities. These may include forestry (planting, bud-capping, pruning),
orienteering (compass skills, pacing, geo-caching), wildlife sign, and history
(rai lroad camp, homestead, gravel pit). We also decided to use the remaining trail
medallions to better mark the trail system, especially the new Lowland Ash Trail.
Nancy Gellennan, DNR, shared that three wood duck boxes had been erected
adjacent to the Old Camp Trail ... within one week of our request!
2. The County Board approved the establishment of a Pavilion Donation Fund and
approved the addition of two forty-acre parcels on the northern edge of the
Demonstration Fores!.
3. We held a Work Day at the Demonstration Forest on April 30 th to conduct trail
and restroom maintenance. We cleared deadfalls from the entire 4.5 mile trail
system, cleaned the two restrooms, and made one new sitting bench on the
Lowland Ash Trail.
4. I met with Todd Lindahl to tour portions of the Demonstration Forest area to
glean some of the important historical highlights from his research and field work.
We hiked portions of two old rail grades (one with 60 feet of rail still in place),
looked at old mining test pits, and visited a potential prehistoric fire ring. Todd
has provided me with dozens of historical pictures to use in developing a field
activity for students.
Work continues on planning the upcoming Natural Resources Field Day for Lake County
6th grade students. I have met with the students and teachers to provide an orientation,
have mailed out schedules to presenters and teachers, met with staff at Split Rock
Lighthouse, and have trained Jesse Schomberg to teach the Lake Superior Game.
Miscellaneous:
I. The Lake County CIU'onicle wrote a feature article on the wood cllipper being shared
between Silver Bay and Two Harbors. This wood chipper was purchased through a
Coastal Program Grant that was supported by both Extension and Lake SWCD.
2. Kim Slanga, former Lake County Volunteer, was selected by the Itasca SWCD for
3. Completed a staff eva luation for Ryan Hughes, BWSR Board Conservationist.
4. Wrote a letter to Forum Communications regarding the dismissal of Forrest Johnson,
fOlmer editor of the Lake County News Chronicle. Forrest was well-respected and
always went over and above to help publicize both SWCD and Extension proj ects.
5. Contacted LeAnn Buck, MASWCD, and requested guidaIlce on whether the SWCD
should sign US DA Attaclunent C. No forma l response yet.
Monthly Narrative - June 11,2009
Activities
We had great weather, excited students, and enthusiastic presenters ... all ingredients to
help make our 22 nd Annual Natural Resources Field Day a success! Approximately 100
sixth grade students combined with 10 teachers and adult volunteers to enjoy the full-day
program. The students watched the movie, "The Age of Steel", and learned about the
history and culture of the North Shore. Following the movie, they toured Split Rock
Lighthouse and the Lighhouse Keeper's home. After lunch the students participated in
three sessions - Water Quality (Lake Superior Game), Recreation, and Forestry. During
these sessions they had the opportunity to role playas well as participate in "hands on"
activities such as tree planting. Judging from the Thank You letters and student
evaluations, the program was very well -received. I sent copies of the letters and
evaluations to each of our presenters.
The Phase I Proposal for the Kawishiwi Watershed Clean Water Protection Project has
Helped to plan a North Shore Erosion Forum meeting that will be held on June 18 th at the
Community Center Building in Two Harbors . The meeting is intended for local officials
that are involved in land use decisions such as elected officials and planning commission
the North Country", and will be leading an afternoon tour on shoreline erosion control
projects and storm water management projects in the Two Harbors area. The program
will also feature presentations on stom1 water mar1agement and the development of the
Cook County Storm Water Ordinance. The meeting is being sponsored by the North
Miscellaneous:
I. Participated in the Knife River TMDL Public Meeting held in Knife Ri ver on June
10'iI. The two-hour meeting featured presentations on the TMDL process. forest
stewardship initiati ves in the watershed. past fo restry efforts, and a preview of the
Implementation Plan (due to be completed by December 2009).
2. Attended the JPB Meeting held in Duluth on May 27 th The meeting included an
update on erosion control and forestry projects from staff and continued di sc ussion
on combining the two JPB areas effective July 1st. Issues still to be determined
include the persOIUlel policy handbook (sick leave accrual, vacati on canyover, flex
time), and office space (co-locate with N RCS, Courthouses, secure pri vate space, and
home work options explored). Other topics of di scussion included R CS
Attachment C and an update on the budget.
nd
3. Participated in the June 2 Department Head Meeting. All Department s were
requested to submit budgets fi ve percent less than their 2009 budgets due to the
budget situation.
Upcoming:
A JOlnr powers org:miz:mon o(Oullon. Cook. L.lke. NOrlh St. LoUIs..1nd SolJth Sf. Lmlls
Wayne Seidel
LakeSWCD
Lake County Service Center
6163" Ave. E.
Two Harbors, MN 55616
R.C .,
This letter is in regards to Dan Walkers property located on Lake Superior in between Two Harbors and Castle Danger.
(NW 1/4, SE 1/4 , Section 6, T. 53N. R.9 W .l . The landowner has experienced bank erosion on his property due to the
nature of the clay bank and the wave action that is present at the toe of the slope during times of intense wave action.
The sliding bank in the most severely eroding area has dimensions of approximately 20-30 feet high and 130 feet long as
measured along the sliding bank. The bank is sparsely vegetated in areas and has some tree and shrub cover in other
areas. The erosion rate appears to be at a slow to moderate rate and may get faster when the water levels come back
up. The geology of the site consists of clay over bedrock. The smooth bedrock slopes back from the lake at a point
where the clay bank intersects the bedrock. The bedrock is very hard and appears to be very stable and resistant to
erosion.. An oblique aerial photo of the site is attached along with site photos.
Erosion at the site is caused by two factors, erosion at the toe of the clay slope from the wave action from very intense
northeast winds, which causes over steepening of the slope, and overland runoff causing slope instability due to soil
saturation . The toe erosion due to wave action is most likely the driving force behind the erosion with the run on being a
secondary factor. There are two main alternatives for controlling toe erosion at this site. Alternative A, install bedrock
pinned large rip rap at the toe of the slope with additional rip rap extending up the slope, or install a concrete wall that
would be pinned into the bedrock as well.
The concrete wall option would consist of pouring a concrete wall that would be most likely pumped to down the slope.
The footings would be pinned into the bedrock through the use of concrete anchors or epoxy. The wall forms would then
need to be set and poured on top of the footings. The design may also consist of concrete tiebacks, which would
functions to prevent the wall from tipping. This design would require a structural engineer to review; therefore, my
recommendation is preliminary. Final design would consist of structural calculations and wall sizing therefore the wall
thicknesses presented in my estimate are based on past projects and not exact design calculations. Plantings could be
done on and on top of the slope to reinforce the soil and prevent further erosion from occurring due to water run on. The
cost estimate for the above-related work is estimated at approx. $30,000.
The pinned rock alternative would consist of mobilizing large diameter rip rap on the order of 2-3 feet in diameter and
pining the bottom row of rocks to the bedrock. This would give the rock a firm foundation and would prevent the
revetment from washing into the lake from toe failure. The estimate was for rock to be placed 6 feet vertically up the bank
and to a thickness of 3 feet This would result in approx. 300 CY of rock being placed on the shoreline. An access road
would also need to be constructed to allow access down to the bottom of the slope for construction of the rock revetment
C:\Oocuments and Settinqs\A11 Users\Oocuments\ACTIVE PROJECTS\lake\Potential Projects\dan walker\d an walker site memo.doc
As with the concrete wall alternative native planUngs to enhance the soil strength on and on top of the slope would be
recommended. This alternative is estimated to cost approx. 533,000.
Either alternative could provide bank protection and would greatly reduce bank erosion at this site. The concrete wall
alternative is estimated to cost slightly less and may involve a smaller construction footprint. Therefore, I would
recommend if the landowner wants to slow or stop the erosion from occurring at his site that the concrete wall option be
the first option pursued with the rock rip rap as the second .
Sincerely,
??-/~
Keith Anderson, P.E.
Conservation Engineer
enclosures
C:\Documents and SettinQs\A1I Users\OocumentsV\CTIVE PROJECTS\Lake\Potential Projects\dan walker\dan walker site memo.doc
Brenda K. Van Bergen Don E. Warner Thomas R. Geli neau David W. Falk Phillip R. Goutermont
Distr ict 1 Distr ict 2 District 3 District 4 District 5
FinlandlUll org, Silver Bay City of Two Harbors LarsmontJ Sil ver Creek} Unorg.
Territory NO. 1 Knife River Territory No.2
July 23 , 2008
Thank you for considering our request to allow the Encampment Forest Association
(EFA) to procure rock from the former Castle Danger Landfill site for a stream bank stabilization
project. EFA will need approximately 345 cubic yards ofD.O.T. Standard Class 4 to 5 to 5+ (up
to 1 - 1 Y, CY rocks) for use in armoring eroding areas along the Encampment River. This
project has public benefits by reducing sediment in the Encampment River and improving water
quality in Lake Superior.
My only concern with the project is the lack of field engineering assistance being
provided to the contractor, Mecklin Construction. Presently, EF A does not have an engineer
who will oversee installation of the project. r have recommended that John Bathke, EF A
Representative, retain a registered professional engineer to monitor the project more closely to
ensure that the project is installed correctly - according to the design specifications he had
prepared by Krech & Ojard Engineering. r would recommend that you make this rock available
to EF A contingent on their providing engineering services sufficient to oversee the project.
Brenda K. VanBergen Don E. Warner Thomas R. Gel ineau David W. Falk Phillip R. Goutermont
District I District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5
FinlandlUnorg. Silvcr Bay City of Two Harbors Larsmontl Silvcr Creek} Unorg.
Tcrrilory No. I Knife River Territory No.2
To : Gill Hensgens
I appreciated the opportunity to meet with you on July 23 rd to field inspect a waterway
that outlets onto your property from an adjoining parcel to the north owned by John Christensen.
My understanding is that your primary concerns include: I) that the water may not have
historically flo wed in this location and, if so, why should you suffer property inconveniences as a
result ; 2) the runoff water may contain excess levels of nutrients since the watershed includes an
area where horses are kept; and, 3) what alternatives do you have to deal with the situation.
Following my visit to your property I also spoke with Mr. Christensen. My site review
included walking hi s propelty as well to view any contributing factors to the waterway issue.
My assessment of the situation is as follows:
1. The waterway that flows southerly under Mr. Christensen's driveway is a natural historic
flow path for water. I observed a broad natural swale (with an incised channel) that was
well vegetated with mature trees on Mr. Christensen' s property. Furthermore, I observed
an old channel that outlets over the bank on your propelty that goes directly downslope
towards the Stewart River. This may have been the historic outlet of this waterway but it
no longer receives water. I am unclear as to what circumstances may have changed to
cause thi s to occur.
2. Mr. Christensen has constructed a new access road (within the past year) approximately
200-300 feet further north of the existing driveway with a ditch on the upslope side that
conveys runoff water towards Highway 3. This ditch has reduced the amount of
contributing watershed to the waterway that flows onto your propel1y.
3. The contributing watershed includes the Christensen's home, garage, corral and a bam
that houses horses. The runofflikely contains elevated levels of nutrients since surface
runoff moves through the corral which contains manure and urine from the hqrses.
4. Your response to the waterway entering onto your property was to constwct a vegetated
swale to move the water in a southeasterly direction toward the old Highway -3 ditch.
This swale, however, remains waterlogged following heavy flow events such as spring
runoff and heavy rains. The waterlogged condhion makes the area more difficult for
lawn maintenance as was evidenced by deep ruts caused by the riding lawn mower.
1explored the following options to minimize the water problems Oil your property:
I. Re-route the flow easterly along the n0l1h side of Mr. Christensen' s driveway. To do so
would kill large numbers of mature trees due to the excavation necessary to maintain
grade towards Hi ghway 3. This would not be beneficial to either of yo u because of the
loss of trees (C hri stensen) and the partial removal of an ex ist ing vegetati ve screen that is
to yo ur benefit.
2. Re-establi sh the natural waterway towards the Stewart River. This is not a preferred
option in my opinion. Re-directing the water away from the steep slope to an alternative
safe outlet will result in less potential erosion and will have less of a detrimental impact
on the Stewart Ri ver if, in fact , the nutri ent levels are elevated.
3. My prefe rred option is to improve the existing constructed waterway on your property by
installing a rock-lined center channel that mayor may not include drain tile. This will
ensure more positive drainage by acting as an under-drain and will minimi ze localized
ponding. Additional work may be necessary in the ditch on old Highway 3 to maintain
an adequate grade to move the water away from the swale outlet.
Please contact me if you have any further questions on my summary or if you need
additional information on thi s matter.
Disclaimer: This report was prepared while acting within the scope of my employment. Any
civil engineering related opinions offered in this repol1 are of a preliminary nattlre onl y, and are
not to be construed as a final engineered design nor cel1ified by a registered professional
engIneer.
Enclosure : Photo of waterway looking north onto the Chri stensen property.
Page \ ,
Wayne Seidel
HiJim,
Thanks for the inquiry on shoreland buffers ... good questions. Fortunately , Extension has a lot of research-based
information to offer on this topic. A great website is the following : http://wrc.umn.edu/outreach/shore/
Two incredibly helpful people would be Mary Blickenderfer and Eleanor Burkett. Mary can be reached at
Blick002@umn.edu , and Eleanor can be reached at Burke044@umn.edu .
They do workshops across the state and are good people to work with. One of the most useful sections I found that WOl
answer a number of your questions would be:
http://www.shorelandmanagement.org/quickins.html
Also, two native seed sources (and possibly plants ) would include:
Maybe we should host a workshop at your site next year ... think about it. I have long thought that this would have great
benefits for Lax Lake and might be a rallying point for the Lake Association . Let me know.
Wayne
P.S. I'll be sending a notice out later today regarding the date for the next Water Plan meeting . The response was mixe(
for a Polymet field tour so we'll have them provide a presention on October 14th.
Wayne R. Seidel
Conservation Specialist
Cook and La ke County Soil & Water Conservation Districts
9/3/2008
Brend<l K. Van Bergen DOll E. Warner Thomas R. Gelin eau Dav id W. Falk Philli p R. G outer llloni
District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5
FinlandJUnorg. Silver Bay City of Two Harbors LarslllontJ Si l\lcr Crcck} Unorg.
Territ ory No. I Knife Rivcr Territory No. 2
We are working with Tim and Karen Erickson, GoosebelTY Cabins, to correct a severe
shoreline erosion problem . Their plan is to protect approximately 100 lineal feet of eroding bank
by pinning large rocks into the bedrock and then backfilling with smaller rock. The Lake County
SWCD has provided technical design assistance tlu'ough Keith Anderson, Joint Powers Board
Engineer, and we have also worked with the contractor, Mecklin Construction, to fmalize the
design.
Please consider our request to procure rock from the fonner Castle Danger Landfill site
for this Lake Superior shoreline stabilization proj ect. The project will require approximately 40
60 cubic yards ofD.O.T. Standard Class 4 to 5 to 5+ (up to 1 - I y, CY rocks) including the
smaller rocks needed for backfill behind the pinned rocks. The Eri ckson's understand the cost of
the rock is $ 1 per cubic yard .
The justification for tlli s request is that the proj ect has public benefits by reducing
sediment pollution into Lake Superior.
Thank you for considering this request and please contact me if you have any questions .
Compiled by:
Matt Huddleston, Lake County Planning and Zoning Department
Wayne Seidel, Lake County Soil Et Water Conservation District
Walt Van Den Heuvel, Lake County Planning and Zoning Department
On September 4, 2008, Matt Huddleston, Wayne Seidel, and Walt Van Den Heuvel
visited Russ Huseby's property on Lax Lake to determine if the WCA Restoration
Order issued by the Lake County SWCD had been carried out and completed by the
required July 31 , 2008 deadline. We met with Russ Huseby at approximately 9
a. m. and field reviewed an Administrative Subdivision Application that Mr. Huseby
had pending. Following this review, we walked to the southernmost end of the
wetland violation area (black ash swale) that was noted as Graded Area 3 in the
Restoration Order. We observed the following:
1. Additional land clearing had occurred on the adjoining upland areas both to
the north and south of the black ash swale. The trees were removed and the
areas cleared of vegetation had been disced.
2. The wood debris windrowed from the initial land clearing in the wetland had
been burned and the ashes spread .
3. The entire wetland impact area had been leveled. Bulldozer tracks were
observed in the wetland swale and the area had been disced. Mr. Huseby
indicated the work had been performed with a rubber tired tractor as well as
tracked earth moving equipment. Sparse vegetation appeared to be emerging
throughout the site, however, the required seeding and tree planting had not
been started.
4. Road Impact Area 3 had not been restored and was still actively being used as
a road.
5. See attached photos for a comparison of the site from September 2007 (photo
028) to September 2008 (photo 001) . Also included is a sequence of
overlapping photos taken in September 2008 (photos 002, 003 , 004, 005) .
Accompanied by Mr. Huseby, we drove to the northern edge of the property
(south of the Wax lax Road) and observed Graded Area 1. We noted the following
conditions:
1. According to Mr. Huseby, the woody debris had been removed , the site had
been rock-raked, and the area had been disced.
2. Road Impact Areas 1 and 2 had not been restored and Road Impact Area 1 was
still actively being used as an access road.
3. See attached photos for a comparison between September 2007 (photos 018,
016) and September 2008 (photos 006 , 007, 008) .
Still accompanied by Mr. Huseby, we walked to Graded Area 2 (south and east of
Mr . Huseby's daughter's house). We observed no additional change to this area.
However, we did observe additional clearing south of this area that would have
corresponded to the eastern end of Graded Area 3. Mr. Huseby confirmed that
additional clearing had occurred but would not allow us to field inspect this site.
Overall Observations :
Summary of Hare Lake Wetland Restoration Site Visit on September 26, 2008
Compiled by:
On September 26,2008, Tim Peterson, Wayne Seidel, and Walt VanDenHeuvel met with Tony
Demars and Matt Brunner at Hare Lake to review the status of the wetland creation effort started
one year ago. The wetland creation (0.20 acres) was initiated to offset 0.11 acres of wetland
Mr. Demars showed us the northernmost wetland creation area and we observed a rectangular
shaped area with mineral soil that contained ponded water up to four inches deep. Wetland plant
species included wool grass, tag alder and sedges. White cedar, tamarack and black spruce were
planted along the perimeter. A monitoring plan had not yet been stal1ed but the monitoring plan
will confirm whether or not the site is developing into a functioning wetland.
In addition to the above restoration site, Mr. Demars showed us two additional linear areas
adjacent to the hiking trail (on the old roadbed) that were naturally converting to wetland. These
areas were wet due to sidehiLl seeps and we observed woolgrass, sedges, Canada blue-joint grass
1. Develop and conduct a monitoring plan to determine if the three sites are developing
as functional wetlands. The plan specifics are contained in the Army Corps of
Engineers Permit (as-built drawings, report timelines, success criteria, etc.)
2. Survey the three areas to determine the alnount of area eligible for wetland creation.
3. Plant additional trees (tamarack, black spruce, white cedar) to attain a 1000 tree per
acre stocking rate.
4. Repair two areas of erosion that cross the hiking trail.
Wayne Seidel
Wayne ,
Thanks for the follow up. I must have misunderstood the species during our discussion. White cedar, black spruce and
tamarack is what I originally planned for, so I am complete agreement. Sorry for the confusion .
Tony
Hi Tony,
I had an opportunity to review your wetland monitoring plan and it looks good, overa ll - species lists, coverage noted,
accurate map, hydrology, management recommendatiOns, etc .. The on ly discrepency was that during our September
fie ld review and in my subsequent fo llow-up letter I recommended the fo llowing species for planting - white cedar, black
spruce, and tamarack - at a stocking rate of 1000 trees p~r acre . Your report states on page 2, item 114, that the TEP
recommended black ash, red maple and white cedar at a 800 tree per acre stocking rate . Due to the likelihood of
Eme rald Ash Borer coming to Minnesota in the future, we aren't recommend ing that peop le plant any ash species.
Thanks.
Wayne
Wayne R. Seidel
Conservation Specialist
.A iOli-J{ powers org:ll11z.7rJon ofCulton, Cook. LIke, .North !:Jr. Louis. ,wd South St. LOUl:t;
SOII .1I1d HJ:1ll'r ConSl'TI":lrion Di!J'rrlcfs t:lskcd With prol'lding conscn,1ClOn engmeenng
.1S5J5(,llh(' co I1h'mbcr S IVCDs .md nonhc.1stcrn lv/i"rmeso(;l I.7nd oCCUp/CH.
Wayne Seidel
LakeSWCD
Lake County Courthouse
601 3rd Ave, East
Two Harbors, Minnesota 55616
Wayne:
This letter is in regards to a site visit conducted on June 30, 2008 at the Soiseth property located north
of Larsmont at 726 Old North Shore drive (Section 15, T52N , R,11W.), The concern from the
landowners is from a small intermittent stream that fiows through their property, The stream bisects
their property and fiows between their house and their driveway. A bridge is used to get across the
stream , which is down cut in a relatively deep channel that varies in depth and width but below the
bridge is approximately 10 feet wide and 6-8 feet deep. The eroded channel walls extend downstream
approximately 90 feet on either side of the channel. The channel bottom is composed of a variety of
substrates that varies from gravel to boulders to bedrock, Downstream of the bridge the stream banks
are bare and eroding, The west bank is fairly close to the Soiseth's house,
The cause of the stream bank erosion may be due to the constriction in the stream that is caused by
the bridge abutments, The bridge abutments are made of cast in place concrete and in fair to good
condition , The abutments force the stream to constrict to a channel opening of approximately 6 feet
wide, This channel constriction causes an increase in velocity during high fiows that has created a
plunge pool below the bridge. An analysis of the upstream hydrology was not performed but this could
also have an effect on the erosion. If the watershed of the stream is being developed without
stormwater management devices or considerations the resulting impacts could be due to increased
stream fiows during rainfall or snowmelt events,
1, Remove and repair Bridge Abutments to allow for a wider channel bottom.
2, Install riprap revetment on both sides of the channel walls downstream of the bridge,
3. Install Concrete walls on either side of the channel.
Alternative #1 consists of removing and repairing the main cause of the problem and would help
prevent the situation from getting greatly worse in the long term but would not stabilize the downstream
banks, The landowners should consider widening the stream channel under the bridge at a point in
time where work needs to be done on the bridge abutments or bridge itself. In the mean time, the
landowners could monitor the condition of the concrete and bridge and replace it if the concrete shows
more serious signs of deterioration. Alternative #2 consists of pinning or digging to rock rip rap into the
stream bed and sloping back at an angle of 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical) for a vertical distance of
approximately 4-5 feet. Above this location the bank could be shaped and planted with shrubs to allow
for greater slope stability. The rip rap would need to be sized and elevation determined as to the point
of the top of the rock with flood flows in mind , The estimated cost for this project is approximately
$15 ,500, This estimate includes restoration, erosion control, plantings, and seeding. This is an
engineer's estimate and upon further design would be updated with more refined information.
The concrete wall alternative would most likely be more expensive than the rip rap alternative and may
not look as natural as well placed and selected rip rap. The very preliminary estimate for a 5 foot high
concrete wall on either side of the channel downstream of the bridge is approximately $27,700. Due to
costs this alternative was eliminated from consideration.
My recommendation would be to rip rap both sides of the channel and shape and plant the areas
above the rip rap with native vegetation, If you or the landowner have any questions regarding the
above alternatives please call.
Sincerely,
Site Photos
Ajoinf poweJ's OIgmizaiol1 o/Ca-/lon, Cook, Lrite, N0I111 Sf. Louis, md Sowh SI. Louis
Soil md W(tel' Consenaiol1 Districts ta;ked with providing conservaiOIl el1gilleeJing
assis(mce io member SJV CDs {lid 11Ort/tm'(ern lHinnesota Imel occllpiers.
Wayne Seidel
LakeSWCD
Lake County Courthouse
601 3rd Ave. East
Two Harbors, Minnesota 55616
Wayne:
This is a summary letter describing a drainage problem located in the City of Silver Bay above Davis
Drive (See Attached Map). A site visit on November 5'", 2008 with yourself and Swede Larson from the
City of Silver Bay was performed. My short history and understanding results from a landowner
concern that is located on the upper side of Davis Drive with the concern being that his yard is wet in
areas that he believes should not be. This portion of the City is located just below a steep hillside with
intermittent drainages that result from runoff on the hillside onto shallow soils and bedrock. When the
city was developed the city planners and engineers, in order to manage surface water runoff,
constructed a series of interceptor ditches that capture hillside runoff and effectively shunts the runoff
into the closest stream. This ditch system intercepts not only the water but also any sediment that is
transported down the hillside. The landowners' yards in this area are at or below the bottom of the
interceptor ditch. It appears that the interceptor ditch bottom is located on bedrock. One theory is that
the wet yard problem that landowners are having is resulting from the groundwater following the
bedrock profile and intersecting the yards below the ditch. This is a theory and was not confirmed in
our site investigation. The ditch also, in one location where an intermittent stream discharges, is filling
with coarse sediments resulting from erosion upstream in the small drainage. These sediments are
causing a blockage in the ditch impeding the water flow. In addition to the main interceptor ditch a
secondary ditch running parallel to the main ditch runs behind the residences below the main ditch.
This ditch is much more subtle and appears to over the years with ground movements and rutting has
not maintained a constant slope and allows for water pooling.
The recommendations for this problem are controlled by access to the ditch and other factors. The
upstream contributing drainages may have things going on in their watersheds that may be causing the
sedimentation in the ditch. It was noted that several trails might be causing bank instability and erosion.
This activity may be leading to increased erosion and stream instability. Other recommendations are
the following:
1. Remove accumulated sediment from the interceptor ditch and return the bottom to the original
profile.
2. Re-grade the ditch located on landowner properties to provide more positive drainage.
3. Allow natural vegetation if landowner preferences allow in landowner ditches to provide for
additional water absorption.
4. As time and resources allow, investigate the source of the upstream erosion and mitigate by
relocating or installing erosion control on trail networks.
Please call or e-mail with any questions regarding the above analysis and recommendation
Sincerely,
A joinr powcr$ olg,ma<1rion O/elr/ron, Cook, L.1k<'. Norm !)r. Louis. .wJ South St. LOllis
Soil,1fJd 1jI,1(l"r COf1SCn,1f/OIl D,:~(nCts f:Jskcd With pro nding cOIJSCn",7tloll ClIginccring
:lSS1~~wncl' ro member S I VCDs .111d l1orcllC'.15rt'rfl Nfmnr'Sot,l hnd occllpier:. .
Wayne Seidel
LakeSWCD
Lake County Courthouse
601 3rd Ave. East
Two Harbors, Minnesota 55616
Wayne:
This letter is in regards to a site visit conducted on June 30, 2008 at the Jacobson property located just
north of County Highway 11 (SW Y.., NE Y.., Section 33, T53N . R.11W.). The landowner has property
on the main branch of the Knife River. The area of concern is where the river is meandering and
intersecting a low terrace that may be in the 50 year floodplain. The bank height is approximately 5-6
feet in height and is experiencing a low rate of erosion. Cracking of the bank soils were observed on
the top of the bank. The land use on top of the bank is primarily lawn area. This lawn was created
relatively recently most likely in the last 5-10 years.
It appears that the erosion at the Jacobson property may be enhanced by the removal of deep rooted
woody vegetation along a bend in the river. The native woody vegetation acts to reinforce and stabilize
banks naturally. When removed and replaced with short rooted grass this stabilizing mechanism is not
available to reinforce the banks. Therefore, in order to reestablish this resisting force my
recommendation is a replanting with native trees and shrubs in the area that is most susceptible to
bank erosion. In addition these trees should provide shade that is integral to maintaining cool water
necessary for trout survival. The trees that should be planted include long-lived conifers such as
spruce, red and white pine. A view corridor from the house to the river can be maintained through well
planned tree planting .
A structural approach to the erosion problem is to add flow diversion structures such as stream vanes
or J-hooks along with a bankfull bench. The vanes or j-hooks are structures that project upstream at a
25-30 degree angle to the tangent to the bank. The vanes and j-hooks are keyed into the bank at
bankfull height and slope down to the stream bottom. During high flows the water will intersect the
vanes and be directed towards the center of the channel. In addition , this type of remedy will create
pools downstream from the tip of the vanes. J-hooks are just slight modifications to vanes with added
rock at the tip of the vane to create a deeper pool area below the vane. Along with the vanes a bankfull
bench may be added to create a reinforced stream bank with area above the bank for the river to
spread out during flood events. The bench can be made of soil reinforced with bioengineering
practices or small rip rap. The bench in the Jacobson case would need to be approximately 150 feet
long and approximately 3-4 feet in height. The work that is proposed in the river will need permits from
DNR Division Waters with comments from DNR Fisheries. Due to the high profile nature of the Knife
River this proposal would get close scrutiny and require the full 60-day review time before it could be
permitted. The total estimated costs for the project that includes the tree and shrub planting is
approximately S8,000.
Sincerely,
Site Photos- View Looking upstream from the east side of the river.
• Page4 June 30, 2009
Top Ten Potential Projects
Lake County
Goal: To conh'o l erosion and prevent sed iment and other pollutants from entering Lake
Superior / stream / lake / wetland / storm drain systems during construction.
E rosion & Sediment Control Principles and Measures (circle all that apply to your project)
Protecting Waterways:
6 . Maintain and protect all natural waterways. Retain at least a 20-foot wide strip of natural
vegetation along all waterways to filter out sediment and other pollutants.
7. Use rock rip-rap at both the inlet and outlet ends ofcul vel1S to prevent scour erosion and use
energy dissipaters at the outlet ends (e.g. plunge poo ls) .
8. In areas of concentrated fl ow in sta ll rock check dams, triangular dikes, bio rol ls or rock
12. Install water bars on access roads to prevent concentrated water runoff from fl owing dO\\l n
the road surface, eroding gra ve l, and/or fillin g in the ditches.
13. To reduce mud transported onto paved roads, a rock construction entrance pad may be
required (6" layer of 1-3" washed rock / a minimum of 50 feet in length / underlain by geo
textile fabr ic).
14. Cover any stockpiled topsoil with plastic (or ot her imperv io us coveri ng) or use a temporary
seed mix to establish vegetation. Consider using stoc kpiled topso il shaped into earthen
berms to serve as temporary sediment bas ins.
CCLNS Joint Powers Board #3
-
2 15 :--':onh FIrst An.-nuC' East. Room I ! 0
"
A j Olnr pow,'rs org,1niz.l{IOI1 OrelrlrOn. Cook. LIke, 1Vorrh St. LOllis, ,wei Sourh Sr. LOllis
!:Jot! and lI ~lfcr COJJSClT.1f10n Discri.:rs tasked wirh Pl'o l'/~Hng cons{'n:uion engmeering
February 5, 2009
Wayne Seidel
LakeSWCD
Lake County Courthouse
601 3rd Ave. East
Two Harbors, Minnesota 55616
Wayne:
This letter is in regards to a site visit conducted on November 5, 2008 in the City of Two harbors adjacent to the
proposed campground expansion north of 7th Avenue (NW )1.., NW )1.., Section 32 , T53N . R.10W.). The
resource concern is the ditch running on the north side of the avenue that is down cutting and causing sediment
to be transported into Lake Superior. The ditch accepts water from the neighborhood north of the area and
across highway 61. The watershed appears mainly urban and developed long before stormwater rules that
would mandate capture and treatment of stormwater. The high peak storm flow rates that discharge from the
urban area have eroded the ditch in question. There is an access road to the tourist information center that
runs across the ditch. This access road has a culvert that is perched and in poor condition.
The remedy for the above problem is to reinforce the ditch with a rock lined channel. This will enable the water
to flow over the rock without eroding the soil in the channel. The ditch would be excavated to a typical cross
section , have geotextile applied and then followed by 1-2 foot thickness of well graded rock rip rap. If this
project moves forward the design would consist of sizing the rip rap, a survey of the site, and the preparation of
a plan set. The culvert underneath the access road is also recommended for replacement. The site would
also need revegetation and mulching to complete the project. The estimated cost for the above-related work is
approximately $14,000 (see attached estimate).
I would enjoy working on this project if it fits with the Lake SWCO's and landowner' s priorities. Feel free to call
or e-mail with any questions.
Sincerely,
Site Photos
th
View of ditch in question from 7 Avenue. Eroding ditch is hidden by vegetation
...- : '.
May 19,2009
From: Wayne Seidel, Conservat ion Spec iali st - Lake Co unty SWCD
I have visited the site twice in May and wanted to prov ide you with both an update and some
summary recommendati ons.
On May 7'h. Keith Anderson (JPB Engineer) and I wal ked up the tributary (above Blomberg's)
all the way to the headwaters. We observed minimal dislUrbance or land use changes that would
result in additional water coming down this waterway. Thi s is the tributary that has contributed a
sedim ent plume to the ditch that has blocked fl ow and allowed water to back up behind it
(directly ups lope from Blomberg' s pro perty).
On May 141h, I visited the site again with Jim Blomberg. We hiked up the snowmob ile/ATV trail
and observed the erosion occuning on the trail system. According to Jim ' s recollect ion, the trail
has eroded more severely recentl y. The trail s cut across the slope and act as a diversion by
captm in g all the cross-slope drainage. The water concentrates in the treads and unuer heavy
runoff conditions will erode the soil. In many areas the soil is wmpleldy eroded away to
bedrock.
Recommendations:
l. Consider a periodic cleanout of the Si lver Bay ditch from above Blomberg' s to a point
south west of the snowmobil e/ATV bridge. Tlu s will removed accumulated sediment and
minimi ze ponding.
2. Consider constructi on of a diversion in the trail northwest of the trai l bridge to divert
water southwesterl y to a natural waterway that enters the ditch downstream of the bridge.
Thi s will prevent the water fro m continuing to erode the trail and depositing sediment at
the bridge site.
3. The property owners down-slope fro m the ditch need to consider re-establishing the
secondary ditch constructed in their back yards. Thi s will prov ide a second line of
defense to help move surface and sub-surface water away fro m their propel1y.
4. The trail system is a maze of disj ointed trail s that will further disru pt natural water fl ow
on this slope. The thi n soils are easi ly eroded.
I have also attached a series of trail photos for your review. Please contact me ifl can be
of further assistance on th is matter @ (2 18) 834-8377.
A ja/or powers org:mizaoon arCH-fron, Cook, Lake, North St. Louis, and South SL Louis
SOli ilnd \·V,2{er Consen'ac1olJ Districts L'lsked with prol'l(iJiJg const:rvilfJon engineering
June 9, 2009
Wayne Seidel
LakeSWCD
Lake County Service Center
6163'" Ave. E.
Two Harbors, MN 55616
RC ,
This letter is in regards to shoreline erosion at the Nelson's property located on Lake Superior just southeast of
Gooseberry State Park. (NE 1/4, SW 1/4 , Section 27 , T. 54N. R9 W). The shoreline in this region of the shore is
composed of intermittent hard and soft bedrock interspersed with areas of clay soils. It appears that the soft bedrock
underlies clay soils and in areas the clay soils have run over the top of the soft bedrock. The soft bedrock at the toe of the
slope is slowly eroding . The area of most significant erosion on this property is a section of shoreline that has dimensions
of approximately 20-30 feet high and 95 feet long as measured along the eroding bank. The second area of more minor
erosion is shorter in extent but closer to the house. Measurement on this second area was not able to be performed due
to the large wave action on the day of the site visit. For the purposes of cost estimating , 50 feet was used. The two
erosion prone areas are bounded by points of fractured crumbled bedrock. The bank is sparsely vegetated in areas and
has some tree, shrub, and grass cover in other areas. The erosion rate appears to be at a slow to moderate rate and
may increase when the lake water levels rise again. This area like many North Shore shorelines has exceptional scenic
quality and any remedial action, if taken , should take the visual impact into account in order to minimize potential visual
impacts. An oblique aerial photo of the site is attached.
Erosion at the site is caused by two factors, erosion at the toe of the clay soft bedrock slope from the wave action from
very intense northeast winds, which causes over steepening of the slope, and overland runoff causing slope instability
due to soil saturation. A few things to consider if a remedial action is taken to control erosion at this site are the following.
The rate of erosion should be considered along with the assets or soil loss that is being protected. In this case the main
physical asset is the house that is located closest to the northeast eroded slope. This slope appears somewhat stable
and is the least affected by the strong northeast winds that produce the largest wave action. The amount of soil loss on
the site appears to be low to moderate as compared with other sites that have little to no bedrock and all clay down to the
waters edge. The least cost remedy is to plant additional trees and shrubs in the shoreland area that will absorb water
and strengthen the soils through rooting.
One alternative for physicaVengineering solutions consist of the use of large rip rap, approx. 24-48" diameter, placed at
the toe of the slope and vegetating the slope up from there. On Lake Superior rip rap is typically toed into the shoreline 4
5 feet to counter the scour produced by intense wave action. The drawback of this approach is the potential visual
impact, the loss of beach area due to the rip rap needing to be at a slope, and the potential cost and construction related
impacts. The benefits are that this remedy has been used successfully to control erosion along various reaches of
shoreline and is proven to be a long term remedy. A second alternative would be to install a concrete wall type structure
The concrete wall option would consist of pouring a concrete wall that would be most likely pumped to down the slope.
The footings would be either dug approx. 4 feet below the existing grade or pinned into the bedrock through the use of
concrete anchors or epoxy. The wall forms would then need to be set and poured on top of the footings. The design may
also consist of concrete tiebacks, which would functions to prevent the wall from tipping . This design would also require a
structural engineer to review. Final design would consist of structural calculations and wall sizing therefore the wall
thicknesses presented in my estimate are based on past projects and not exact design calculations. Plantings could be
done on and on top of the slope to reinforce the soil and prevent further erosion from occurring due to water run on. The
cost estimate for the above-related work is estimated at approx, $33,000, (See Attached),
The rock rip rap alternative would consist of mobilizing large diameter rip rap on the order of 2-3 feet in diameter and
pining the bottom row of rocks to the bedrock and/or toeing into the existing cobble shoreline, This would give the rock a
firm foundation and would prevent the revetment from washing into the lake from toe failure, The estimate was for rock to
be placed 4-6 feet vertically up the bank and to a thickness of 3 feet. This would result in approx, 260 CY of rock being
placed on the shoreline. An access road would also need to be constructed to allow access down to the bottom of the
slope for construction of the rock revetment. As with the concrete wall alternative native plantings to enhance the soil
strength on and on top of the slope would be recornmended, This alternative is also estimated to cost approx. $33,000
(see Attached),
Either alternative could provide bank protection and would reduce bank erosion at this site. The concrete wall alternative
would involve a smaller construction footprint and if done correctly less of a visual impact. Therefore, I would recommend
if the landowner wants to slow or stop the erosion from occurring at his site that the concrete wall option be the first option
pursued with the rock rip rap as the second. If interested the gabion basket approach could be further analyzed, If an
engineering solution is selected a MN DNR Waters permit would be required,
L
Sincerel~
fl~~
Keith Anderson, P,E,
Conservation Engineer
enclosures
SUBTOTAL $28,491
s
Brend a K. VanB ergen Don E. Warn er Thomas R. Gel ineau David W. Fall-: Ph illip R. Gou iennoni
Di strict I Distri ct 2 Distri ct 3 Dislricl 4 District 5
Fin landfU norg. Silver Bay City Of Two Harbors l.al"5montl Sil vcr Creek! Unorg.
We are working with Pat and Nancy Harvey to COITect a severe streambank erosion
problem along the Beaver Ri ver. Their plan is to protect approx imatel y 200 lineal feet of
eroding bank by constrLlcting a rock rip rap bench along the bank and in stalling a series of stream
"vanes" to deflect water away from the outer bank. The Lake County SWCD has provided
technical design assistance through Keith Anderson, Joint Powers Board Engineer, and we will
also be working with their contractor to finali ze the design.
Please consider our request to procure rock from the former Castle Danger Landfill site
for this streambank stabilization project. The project will require approximatel y 90 cubic yards
of D.O.T. Standard Class 4 and 50 cubic yards of Class 2 (smaller rocks needed for the bench).
We understand the cost of the rock is $1 per cubic yard.
The justifi cation for thi s request is that the proj ect has public benefits by reducing
sediment pollution into the Beaver Ri ver and, ultimatel y, Lake Superior.
Thank you for considering thi s request and please contact me if you have any questions.
At this forum, attendees will learn about erosion efforts along the North
Shore, how stormwater contributes to erosion, and how a stormwater
control ordinance can be effective. Also, the forum will include field visits
to local erosion project sites and a discussion on what considerations
should be made during development projects along the North Shore. The
goal of the forum is to educate local officials and support good land use
decision making by local government staff, planning commissions, and
elected boards to expand their knowledge on erosion issues.
Management, in conjunc
tion with Minnesota's
Isarabia@ardc.org
9 :30 AM REGISTRAT IO
10:00 AM We1comellntroducti on
NSMB Representative
I I :35 PM LUNCH
3: 15 PM Wrap-Up/Questions
This project was funded in part by the Co astal Zo ne Management Act. by NOAA's Ojfice
ofOcean and Coastal Resource A'fanagement, in conjunction lrith Minnesota's Lake
. Superior Coastal Program.
..
Legend
,.,
~ Skunk Creek
Tour Route