Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OF MATTER
JANUARY 2014
Copyright
2014
Copyright is held by Prof Martin Dove, Queen Mary University of
London
i
Acknowledgements
In the end this book will be published with full accreditation to all involved. At this time, these people are Anthony Phillips, Serena Maugeri
and Min Gao from Queen Mary University of London, and David Palmer and Mike Conley of CrystalMaker Software Ltd. The movies and
crystal structure images were produced using a development version of
the CrystalMaker visualisation software. Funding to support some of the
work was provided by a grant from Queen Mary University of London.
ii
Preface
the screen (which can be inorganic or organic materials); the transparent conductors used to give the screen its response to touch; the thin
strong glass front cover; and even the lightweight alloys used for the
case.
iii
We have had the techniques to understand the atomic structure of materials since the pioneering work of Henry and Lawrence Bragg in developing the x-ray diffraction method in 1913. It might of course be argued that mankind developed a detailed knowledge of metalwork
through the bronze and iron ages and past the industrial revolution
without any knowledge of the atomic structure of metals, and there are
other examples of materials that were successfully exploited without
any understanding of their structure (one example is the active component of polaroid materials, which was only understood very recently
and 150 years since their first use), but we now ask so much more of
modern materials in terms of the microscopic size of components, the
speeds of which we expect responses, and the robustness required to
see millions of components work together reliable for long periods of
time. And it is because we ask so much of our materials that we need
to have good materials design, and good design needs a good knowledge of material structures.
This book is about the atomic structure of materials, giving the reader
the opportunity to observe and experiment.
iv
CHAPTER 1
Welcome
Forward to chapter
vi
Introduction
Preamble
This book is concerned with the structure of matter at the atomic
level. Nature has given us 84 stable (or virtually stable) atom types,
with a range of size, valence, and shape of electronic orbitals, giving rise to different ways of bonding with other atoms, which leads
to the rich diversity of material structures and properties that are either found naturally or can be synthesised. Understanding the
atomic structure of matter, and how its properties are determined by
the structure, is as much as a visual task as it is a matter of writing
equations. This book has been created specifically to help address
7
In this book you will find animations and images that are impossible to
reproduce within the traditional book format, and usually only possible
to access with specialised software or via web tools. These will give an
unparalleled perspective on the atomic structure of matter.
a solid has both size and shape, a liquid has size but no fixed shape (a
liquid flows (Movie 1.1 shows the atomic motions within a liquid), and
a gas has neither shape nor size (a gas expands to fill the space it is in).
Inevitably, this picture is rather a gross simplification, but it does at
least open up a basic characterisation.
We will mostly be concerned with the solid state. We will mostly be
concerned with solids that are crystalline in form, but we will also discuss glasses. We should quickly dispel some myths regarding the solid
state that might be implied by this basic characterisation, namely that
solids are static ordered objects. We will see in this book that some solids are indeed well ordered, but even in these cases the atoms are vibrating back and forth around their average positions, with their kinetic
energy corresponding to the temperature of the material. In some cases
the motions can be quite large, leading to some degree of structural
disorder. Molecules can tumble, some atoms can form on a fluid subphase within the structure, and glasses form with significant topological disorder. Moreover, even in the most ordered structures, imperfections known as defects can arise through the crystal growth phase,
as a result of subsequent handling, and indeed spontaneously due to
the atomic motions.
But the foundation to understanding the solid state is indeed the perfectly ordered crystalline phase, where atoms are arranged in neat patterns that repeat almost indefinitely throughout three-dimensional
space. To understand crystal structures requires an appreciation of symmetry and chemical bonding, both of which have a significant visual
component.
are shown in Gallery 1.1. These crystals were all produced naturally
within the Earth's crust, either as a result of slowly growing from solutions or from the molten state.
The mysterious shapes of snowflakes, which always have a hexagonal
symmetry, must arise from some internal structure of the ice crystals in
exactly the same way that the more regular shapes of naturally grown
crystals reflect an inner structure.
Iron-rich meteorites have a composition that is primarily iron (majority
phase) and nickel. As the meteorite was cooled, the metal phase sepa-
Optical birefringence
A second experiment on this crystal of calcite or indeed on many
crystals can be performed using two sheets of polaroid film. Light
propagates as vibrating electrical and magnetic fields, and the polarisation (that is, the direction in which the vibrating electrical field is generated) can lie in any direction perpendicular to the direction in which
the light wave is travelling. A polaroid sheet is typically made from
11
appears as if some internal axis of the crystal is aligned with the polarising direction of the polaroid sheets.
12
13
Scale
Length scales
We operate on the length scale of the metre. The metre is a bit
longer than our walking stride, but we can stretch our arms a little
bit wider than one metre. It might be a walking journey of about
one thousand metres (1 km) to visit the local shops, and a car or
train journey of up to a few hundred km to visit our friends and families. The subjects of geography and geology take us into the realm of
thousands of km, and astronomy takes us way beyond such distances. Going downwards in size we start to struggle with objects of
the size of a millimetre or so (such as the screw that hold my spectacles together). The thickness of paper or the width of a human hair
14
takes us down to some hundredths of a millimetre, which is now expressed in terms of tens of micrometers (one micrometre, written as 1
m, is equal to 1 millionth of a metre, 106 m). Fine powders have
grain sizes that go below 1 m, but by now we have reached the limits
of the human eye. Optical microscopes allows us to see down to a fraction of a m, but we then touch the limits of visible light, with wavelength of order 0.5 m.
We often hear about nanotechnology and nanoparticles. The nanometre is one thousandth of a 1 m, or 109 m. Viruses have sizes of upwards of 20 nm (rather smaller than bacteria). Inorganic nanoparticles
(examples such as gold, germanium and silicon dioxide) can be grown
to sizes down to 10 nm. DNA molecules are about 2.5 nm wide. The
development of fast computers depends on being able to produce silicon circuits that are as thin as 25 nm.
Clearly the length scale of the atom must be smaller than the
nanoscale. In fact it is down by one order of magnitude, namely about
0.1 m or 1010 m. This length scale is sufficiently special that it has its
own unit, the ngstrom, namely 1 = 1010 m, and this unit is permitted under the SI system. It is the unit that is routinely used in the science of atomic structures of materials, and is the unit that will be used
here.
For further reading, Wikipedia has a nice article comparing length
scales from the very large to the very small.
Time scales
Our natural time scale is 1 second. This is the unit we count down the
start of a race, for example, and is about the time it takes us to stride 1
m. A slow heart will beat at a rate of once per second. The human
15
Vibrations are not the only dynamics of interest. Materials will have
missing atoms and impurity atoms. The time scale for atoms to hop into
vacant sites or for impurity atoms to hop between neighbouring sites is
typically of the order of 1 s, or faster or slower by powers of 10 depending on temperature and the height of the potential energy barriers.
Thus we can see dynamical processes associated with large-scale
atomic motions diffusion on the frequency range from kHz to GHz.
Again, Wikipedia has a useful article on time scales from the very slow
to the very fast.
16
Seeing atoms
It should be clear from the preceding section that the world of the
atom is outside what we might expect to see with any optic device.
The wavelength of visible light is so much larger than the size of the
atom that there is no scope to build a microscope that will allow us
to focus down to the atom. Howev
Australian father and son team William (Leeds) and Lawrence (Cambridge) Bragg showed that beams of x-rays can be scattered by crystals
through a process known as diffraction, because the wavelength of xrays (a form of electromagnetic radiation like light, but with much
shorter wavelength) is similar to the distances between bonded atoms.
For example, a common source of x-rays in the laboratory is from a
copper anode, giving x-ray beams with a wavelength of 1.54 . The
first experiments with x-rays used photographic film to record the xrays scattered by the crystal, finding that the scattered beams were only
found in well-defined directions. These researchers deduced the mathematical relationships that showed how the scattering in these special
directions is related to the internal structure of the crystal, thereby proving for the first time that crystals do have an internal periodic structure.
von Laue was awarded the Nobel prize for Physics in 1914, and the
Braggs were awarded the prize the following year (see the Appendix).
X-ray diffraction, as the technique is now called, was quickly refined.
The theory was developed to enable the intensities of reflections to be
related to the positions of the atoms, and methods established to allow
researchers to deduce the atomic structure of crystals from the completed diffraction data. Nowadays this method is routine for most materials indeed, it is now operated as a service rather than as an intellectual effort for most materials and materials as complex as crystals of
proteins and virus can be tackled using the method. Indeed, x-ray diffraction was the crucial technique for deducing the atomic structure of
DNA, and that was only 40 years after the discoveries of von Laue and
the Braggs.
Figure 1.4 shows an example of the diffraction of x-rays by a crystal as
recorded on a x-ray photographic film. The primary feature (admittedly
enabled through a particular way of recording the photograph that re-
X-rays, however, do not see atoms. The way they are scattered by a crystal is directly determined by the arrangement of atoms within a crystal,
which allows us to deduce the atomic structure of a crystal from x-ray
diffraction data but only through subsequent analysis.
Electron microscope
The electron microscope exploits the wave nature of electrons. Electrons accelerated to energies of 10 keV will have a wavelength of
0.12 , and shorter wavelengths correspond to higher energies than
can be generated. Because electrons are charged particles they will interact with the electrons and the electric fields within the crystal,
which gives rise to the diffraction but also leads to loss of energy of the
beam. Thus experiments with electron beams are performed on very
thin samples.
The electron beam is diffracted in the same way that x-rays are diffracted, but because the wavelength is so small the angle of diffraction
is much smaller. This allows the use of electromagnetic fields acting as
lenses to recombine the scattered beams to create an image, performing the mechanical analogue of the analysis of x-ray diffraction. Thus it
is possible to directly record an image of the atoms in the crystal. Well,
it is not the sort of image we might see with light, because atoms will
scatter x-rays in complicated ways that means that features in the image will not necessarily correspond to actual atoms. One example of
when we can associate atoms with features is shown in Figure 1.5,
which shows an image of crystalline silicon. Here the blobs represent
actual atoms, as is confirmed by the inset showing the crystal structure
modelling by software.
19
CHAPTER 2
Forward to chapter
xxi
try. Gallery 2.1 shows how it is possible to describe some of the point
symmetry elements:
Considering an axis coming out of the plane of atoms and passing
through an atom, it is clear that rotation of the plane by (n /6) 360,
23
where n is any integer, will bring the whole structure into coincidence with itself. This type of symmetry is called rotational symmetry, and the fact that we can rotate by 1/6th of a revolution means
that this this is called 6-fold rotational symmetry.
There are other points in the plane where there is a different type of
rotational symmetry. The point between three atoms defines the position of the axis of 3-fold rotational symmetry, where we can rotate
the structure by any (n /3) 360 to bring it back into coincidence
with itself. The point where two atoms touch defines the position of
the axis of 2-fold rotational symmetry, where now the rotation is
(n /2) 360.
If we draw an infinite line that passes through the centres of two connected atoms, we see that this line defines a mirror such that the arrangement of atoms to the left of the line is a mirror image of the atoms to the right; this is called mirror symmetry. Identical lines can be
drawn at 60 rotations, reflecting the 6-fold rotational symmetry.
There is an additional set of mirror planes at right angles to this initial
set, passing through one atom and also through the point where two
neighbouring atoms touch.
More information on point symmetry is provided in Appendix A.
we need to allow for the lattice to be both rotated and translated without losing the definition of the lattice. Thus the lattice is more usually
described in terms of the lengths of these two vectors and the angle between them. This is illustrated in Figure 2.1.
The two vectors of the lattice actually define a repeating volume (or
area in two dimensions) of the crystal, as shown in Gallery 2.2. This volume is called the unit cell, and is the fundamental repeating entity. In
our two-dimensional example, the unit cell contains just one atom, but
in most cases the unit cell will contain several atoms; when we generalise to three dimensions shortly, our first example will contain 2 atoms
in the unit cell.
The dimensions of the unit cell, namely the lengths of the edges of the
unit cell (that is, the lengths of the vectors that define the lattice) and
the angle(s) between the vectors, are collectively called the lattice parameters. In three dimensions, the three unit cell lengths are given the
symbols a, b and c, and the three angles have the symbols , and .
The relationship between these parameters, and particularly how the
angles are defined in terms of the three vectors (e.g. is the angle between the vectors of length b and c), is shown in Figure 2.1. The vectors that define the lattice are denoted as a, b and c (but see Box 2.1).
The symmetry of the unit cell defined for the two-dimensional array of
spheres is reflected in the values of the lattice parameters, namely that
we have a = b and = 120 (by convention the obtuse angle is chosen).
Sometimes it is possible to define a unit cell that is twice as large as the
smallest possible unit cell but which has unit cell angles that are 90. It
is possible to define such a unit cell for our two-dimensional arrangement, as seen in on the imagines in Gallery 2.2. In this case, we have
a=
3b. There is now a lattice point in the centre of the unit cell;
25
Box 2.1
The use of the lattice vectors a, b and c follows the standard
practice of people who study crystal structures, but other communities prefer a convention that might appear more logical,
namely the set of vectors a1, a 2 and a3. However, the logic
doesnt survive the attempt to name the angles between the vectors. Thus this convention is often used within Physics text
books where much of the discussion concerns simple crystals of
metals, where it is easy to avoid having to think about the unit
cell angles.
26
Three-dimensional close-packed
structures
Going from two to three dimensions
The easiest way to generate a three-dimensional close-packed structure is to stack close-packed layers on top of each other. The best
way to do this is not to merely place one atom above another, but
instead to translate the second layer such that the atoms in this
plane snug into the dimples between atoms within the first plane.
These dimples lie at the middle of the triangle defined by three
touching atoms. The interesting thing is that there are two times as
many of these dimples as there are atoms, separated by distance
a / 2 as seen in Figure 2.2. Thus when we come to add a third
plane, it has a choice of which set of dimples to use that has a sig27
FIGURE 2.2 Two sets of dimple sites (red and yellow) in the 2d closepacked layer into which atoms in an equivalent layer above
achieve three-dimensional close packing.
nificance that was not important when we added the second layer. If
we denote the positions of the atoms as the set A, the positions of one
set of dimples as B and of the other set of dimples as C (see Figure 2.2),
we can consider the original plane of atoms as lying in set A and the
second set of atoms as lying in positions defined by B. We then need to
define the positions of layers 3 and beyond, and decide how often the
sequence of layers repeats in this new third direction. It is found that
nature tends to chose two options, namely the sequences ABAB and
ABCABC, which we will now consider separately.
28
1 2 1
, ,
3 3 2
In the hcp structure, each atom has 6 atomic neighbours in the closepacked plane, and 3 atomic neighbours in each of the planes above
and below. This gives a total of 12 neighbours, arranged in the shape of
polyhedron shown in Interactive 2.3.
29
a ()
c ()
c/a
Difference
Be
2.286
3.584
1.568
4.0%
Cd
2.979
5.619
1.886
+15.5%
Co
2.507
4.070
1.623
0.6%
Hf
3.196
5.051
1.580
3.2%
Lu
3.503
5.551
1.585
2.9%
Mg
3.209
5.211
1.624
0.6%
Os
2.734
4.317
1.579
3.3%
Re
2.761
4.456
1.614
1.2%
Ru
2.706
4.282
1.582
3.1%
Sc
3.309
5.273
1.594
2.4%
Tc
2.625
4.388
1.672
+2.4%
Ti
2.951
4.686
1.588
2.8%
3.647
5.731
1.571
3.8%
Zn
2.665
4.947
1.856
+13.7%
Zr
3.232
5.147
1.593
2.4%
1 2 1
, ,
3 3 3
2 1 2
, ,
3 3 3
1 1
, ,0
2 2
1 1
,0,
2 2
1 1
0, ,
2 2
But what we have defined is not a primitive cell, but instead a conventional cell where each atom position also represents a lattice point. The
30
cell volume per atom of Vcell = a 3 /4 = 4 2r 3. The volume actually occupied by one atom is Vatom = 4r 3 /3. Thus the fraction of space occupied by the spherical atoms is
f = Vatom /Vcell = (4r 3 /3)/(4 2r 3) = / 18 = 0.74.
31
a ()
Element
a ()
Element
a ()
Ag
4.085
Ir
3.839
Pt
3.924
Al
4.050
Kr
5.656
Rh
3.803
Ar
5.313
Ne
4.446
Sr
6.085
Au
4.078
Ni
3.524
Xe
6.129
Ca
5.588
Pb
4.951
Cu
3.615
Pd
3.891
Dynamics
The impression given by this discussion is that these structures consist
of hard spheres that are tightly packed together. In reality, as we will
see later, the atoms are not very hard, and there is a degree of flexibility with regard to how close the atoms can approach each other.
INTERACTIVE 2.7 The polyhedron formed by the nearest-neighbours
in the cubic close-packed structure, where each vertex represents
the site of the neighbouring atom and where the origin atom is
located at the centre of the polyhedron.
The hcp structure will have the same packing efficiency as the ccp
structure, because it uses the same closed-packed planes and stacking
of pairs of planes.
Some examples of ccp metals with their lattice parameters are given in
Table 2.2.
We will learn later that the atoms moved due to a large number of
waves travelling through the crystal. There are so many waves that the
accumulated action on any individual atom appears chaotic, but in reality the atomic motions are following well-defined vibrations.
Movie 2.1 shows the dynamics of atoms in a ccp structure at a temperature close to the melting point. The key impression to gain from this animation is the extent to which atoms are able to vibrate back and forth
in spite of the impression we have earlier that atoms can be represented as hard spheres. Atoms appear able to vibration with an amplitude as large as 1530% of the interatomic separation at temperatures
close to the melting point.
32
33
Body-centred cubic
Many crystal structures of the metallic elements adopt a different simple crystal structure, which is defined as a cubic unit cell with an atom
at the centre of the cube, so that the fractional coordinates of the two
atoms are
1 1 1
, ,
2 2 2
35
a ()
Element
a ()
Element
a ()
Ba
5.028
Li
3.510
Rb
5.585
Cr
2.910
Mo
3.147
Ta
3.301
Cs
6.141
Na
4.291
3.030
Fe
2.867
Nb
3.300
3.165
5.328
Ra
5.148
3 /8 = 0.68.
[001]. The ccp structure of the kamacite phase is harder to see because
we are viewing it down the x-y axis, the direction we will call [110].
The interface is then cut at an angle to the main axes in both cases. We
are not in a position to describe crystal faces or planes of atoms, but
for future reference, the interface is described as the (110) plane of
taenite and the (111) plane of kamacite. From knowing how we have
defined the vector directions, you can probably see that these plane
designations make some sense.
For a perfect match, the repeat distance going down the interface in
each direction needs to be very similar. In the case of this interface, the
two vectors are the [110] vector in kamacite and half of the [112] direction in taenite. For this interface to be relatively free of strain requires
the following relationship between the unit cell parameters:
3/2ataenite =
2akamacite
If we approximate taenite as the pure nickel ccp structure and kamacite as the pure iron bcc structure, using the data from the previous tables we find that the left hand term equals 4.316 and the right hand
side equals 4.055 . This matches to an agreement of 6%. This is not
perfect, but the difference can be accommodated.
Diamond structure
If we look again at the ccp structure, it can be seen that there are potential sites for additional atoms in the spaces between the atoms of the
ccp structure. These are shown in Interactive 2.11, which shows sites
that have 6 atomic neighbours in the shape of a regular octahedron,
and sites with 4 atomic neighbours in the shape of a regular tetrahedron. We will consider these spaces in more detail when we consider
the crystal structures of some simple compounds.
The case of the tetrahedral sites is much more interesting here, because
the elements carbon (diamond), silicon, germanium and tin (the phase
of time called grey tin) crystallise in a structure in which half of the tetrahedral sites are occupied. The structure is shown in Interactive X.
The atomic positions are
37
It is worth re-iterating that each atom in the diamond structure has four
neighbouring atoms. This is unlikely to lead to an efficient packing of
spheres (see below), but instead elements forming the diamond structure have strong directional covalent bonding that favours tetrahedral
arrangements of atoms.
The packing fraction of the diamond structure is easily calculated. The
interatomic distance is one quarter of the cube diagonal, and so the lattice parameter is equal to a = 8r / 3. With 8 atoms in the cubic unit
cell, the space occupied by one atom is a 3 /8 = 64r 3 /3 3. The packing
fraction is thus
f = (4r 3 /3)/(64r 3 / 27) =
3 /16 = 0.34
which is exactly one half of the packing fraction of the bcc structure.
1 1
, ,0
2 2
1 1 1
, ,
4 4 4
3 3 1
, ,
4 4 4
1 1
,0,
2 2
;
3 1 3
, ,
4 4 4
1 1
0, ,
2 2
;
1 3 3
, ,
4 4 4
Or described in conventional terms, the diamond structure has a facecentred cubic lattice, with two atoms in the entity called the motif or
basis that are then duplicated by the lattice vectors. The motif of basis
is described as having atoms at the two positions
0,0,0
1 1 1
, ,
4 4 4
38
39
Crystal symmetry
We have noted that crystals are defined by the existence of symmetry;
without symmetry a solid would be a glass rather than a crystal. We
identified two types of symmetry. One is the point symmetry, defined
as the set of symmetry operations that cause the environment around a
point to be transformed so as to generate an identical copy. The other is
the translational symmetry, by which translation of the entire crystal by
a lattice vector will give a new structure that is identical to the original
structure.
a volume that is some multiple of the primitive unit cell. The unit cell
edge lengths are denoted by the scalar quantities a, b and c, and the
angles between the three lattice vectors have symbols , and .
the motif or basis is the set of atoms associated with each lattice
point. Some of our examples so far only had one atom in the motif,
but the hcp and diamond structures both have two.
Centred lattices
We have met two descriptions of the unit cell (indeed, of the lattice) in
which it is conventional to define the unit cell to be a multiple of that
of the primitive lattice. This is always done in order to be able to define
unit cells with right-angles where possible. The possible centred lattices
are
Face-centred unit cell, where there is a lattice point at the origin of
the unit cell and at the centres of each face of the unit cell. A face
centred lattice is given the symbol F.
Body-centred unit cell, where there is a lattice point at the origin and
centre of the unit cell. A body-centred lattice is given the symbol I.
Single-face centred lattice, where there is a lattice point at the origin
and at the centre of one face of the unit cell. Depending on which
face is chosen, a single-face-centred lattice is given the symbol A, B
or C.
Rhombohedral lattice, that is too much to discuss here but should be
mentioned. This has symbol R.
40
Point symmetry
We have been introduced to point symmetry in terms of two symmetry
operations, namely rotational and mirror symmetries:
rotational symmetry exists when the crystal is rotated by 360 /n and
comes back into coincidence with itself. For a molecule the integer n
can have any value, but the existence of the crystal lattice is only
commensurate with values for n of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6. Translational symmetry is inconsistent with n = 5, although this symmetry appears to
be present in some materials called quasi-crystals. We have explicitly
met the cases n = 3 and n = 6 so far. This symmetry is denoted by the
number n.
mirror symmetry describes the situation when a crystal can be reflected in a plane to generate an exact copy of itself.
There is technically one other type of symmetry we need to be concerned with, although it has one important case that is often treated
separately; this is the rotoinversion symmetry, in which a rotation
about an axis by an angle 360 /n is then combined with changing the
sign of all three coordinate values, called the inversion operation. Rotoinversion symmetry is denoted by the symbol n.
The special case of the simplest rotoinversion symmetry, 1, is called the
centre of symmetry. Many crystals have a centre of symmetry. Crystals
with this symmetry cannot have a polar axis without application of an
electric field.
It is also worth remarking that the rotoinversion symmetry 2 is equivalent to a mirror plane.
41
A third example is the combination of a 2-fold axis and a perpendicular mirror plane. We take the case where the 2-fold axis (and hence the
normal to the mirror plane) is along the x axis. The operations of the 2fold axis and mirror plane respectively give new symmetricallyequivalent positions x, y, z and x, y, z. If we now operate on the position
generated by the 2-fold axis by the mirror symmetry, we generate a
fourth symmetrically-equivalent position: x, y, z x, y, z, which corresponds to the action of a centre of symmetry, of symbol 1.
To extend this analysis, it should be clear that three mutually perpendicular mirror planes will generate three 2-fold axes along the intersections of the mirror planes, and a centre of symmetry.
There are in fact 32 unique combinations of point symmetry elements
that are consistent with the existence of the crystal lattice; these are
called the crystallographic point groups.
At this point we have no reason to care about this level of detail, but
when we come to think about applications of crystal structures it will
be the case that symmetry can be extremely important. For example,
micro-scale transducers and actuators (for example in microphones),
infrared sensors, spark generators, and quartz oscillators, depend on
the absence of a centre of symmetry of the material being used. Some
optical applications depend on materials not having higher rotational
symmetry.
x, y, x
x, y, z
x, y, z
x, y, z
x, y, z
x, y, z
x, y, z
The origin corresponds to the point with the centre of symmetry. The
points that lie on the mirror planes have coordinates
0,y, z
x,0,z
x, y,0
If we one of these, say the first, operation of the 2-fold rotation axes
will generate equivalent positions at
0,y, z 0,y, z ; 0,y, z ; 0,y, z
42
Similarly the points that lie along the 2-fold rotation axes are
x,0,0 ;
0,y,0
0,0,z
Now if operate by the mirror planes, we get the set of equivalent positions
x,0,0 ;
0,y,0
0,0,z
1
,0,0
2
1 1 1
, ,
2 2 2
1 1
0, ,
2 2
1
0, ,0
2
;
1 1
,0,
2 2
0,0,
;
1
2
1 1
, ,0
2 2
43
Triclinic
Monoclinic
Orthorhombic
Trigonal / Rhombohedral
Tetragonal
Hexagonal
Cubic
A, B or C
the lattice itself has a 6-fold rotational symmetry. But it is possible for
the motif to have only 3-fold rotational symmetry and take this lattice. A primitive unit cell with the second set of lattice parameters
can be recast in terms of the first if the 3-fold axis is aligned with the
c lattice of this first lattice, but in so doing the unit cell is three times
as large as that of the primitive unit cell.
tetragonal, for which the defining symmetry is the presence of a single 4-fold axis, with lattice parameters a = b c and = = = 90.
hexagonal, for which the defining symmetry is the presence of a 6fold axis, with lattice parameters a = b c ; = = 90, = 120.
cubic, for which the defining symmetry is the presence of four 3-fold
axes, with lattice parameters a = b = c and = = = 90. It is
tempting to believe that all cubic structures have 4-fold rotational
axes along the three cubic lattice directions, but there are cubic crystals for this which is not the case.
44
These 7 axes can be defined with and without centring, to give a total
of 14 lattices, called the Bravais lattices. These are enumerated in Table
2.4 and shown as 3d images in Appendix B.
It is worth remarking that when we combine the 32 crystallographic
point groups with the Bravais lattices, and allow screw axes to replace
rotation axes and glide planes to replace mirror planes, there is a total
number of 230 combinations, which are called the crystallographic
space groups.
Going forward
1/2
1/2
The key information that is needed going forward from this section is
that regarding the Bravais lattices. We will now meet crystal structures
of the elements that do not have cubic or hexagonal symmetry.
Pressure (GPa)
20
Melt
Diamond
10
Graphite
0
2000
4000
Temperature (C)
Carbon
For many years it was believed that there are two basic forms of carbon, namely graphite and diamond. The diamond structure is identical
to that of silicon discussed in an earlier section of this chapter, with tetrahedral coordination, whereas graphite (which is the more common
form as the stable form at ambient pressure) consists of sheets of carbon in a hexagonal arrangement, with weak bonds between the sheets.
This is shown in Interactive 2.13. The crystal structure has trigonal symmetry through the way that the hexagonal ring are stacked on top of
each other, with atoms at positions
0,0,0
0,0,
1
2
1 2
, ,0
3 3
2 1 1
, ,
3 3 2
48
INTERACTIVE 2.14 C60 molecules crystallise in a simple cubic closepacked structure, which only develop orientational order at lower
temperatures. This image shows the ordered structure, that is
clearly based on the ccp arrangement of molecules.
molecule sits on a lattice site. The point symmetry of these sites contains 3 perpendicular 4-fold rotation axes, yet the molecule itself does
not have this symmetry. The only way for the symmetry to be reconciled is if the molecules are rotationally disordered, so that the 4-fold
rotational symmetry reflects the range of molecular orientations. In real49
Diatomic molecules
Here we consider the molecules H2, N2, O2, F2, Cl2, I2 and Br2. The
halogens form crystal structures in which the molecules are aligned in
what is often called a herringbone structure, as illustrated in Interactive
2.16, typically with orthorhombic lattices. Like the case of carbon
50
crystalline phase. For example, N2 has the hcp structure with tumbling
of the molecules. The structure is shown in Movie 2.3.
52
53
CHAPTER 3
Size constraints
56
the anions touch each other in each coordination, providing the case
of 12-coordination for good measure:
r
4-coordination: + =
r
r
6-coordination: + =
r
r
8-coordination: + =
r
1
3/2 1
1
21
1
31
r
12-coordination: + = 1
r
= 4.449
= 2.414
= 1.366
Examples
Values of ionic radii for many common cations and anions are tabulated in Appendix D. The ratios for some simple oxides are given in Ta57
Compound
Radius ()
Coordination
Radius ratio
MgO
0.86
1.453
CaO
1.14
1.096
TiO2
0.745
1.678
SiO2
0.40
3.125
Al2O3
0.675
1.852
ble 3.1, where we take the radius of the O2 anion as 1.25 . The fact
that Si4+ usually always forms tetrahedral coordination with O2 in compounds at ambient pressure is clearly explained by the radius ratio (at
high pressure it forms an octahedral coordination; the published tables
of ionic radii assign a larger radius for Si4+ of 0.54 this case). The examples of Mg2+, Al3+ and Ti4+ are clearly also comfortable as having octahedral coordination. The one oddity is Ca2+, which is a large ion and
would happily have 8 neighbouring oxygen atoms. In fact the coordination of Ca2+ is found to be quite variable between different materials
and crystal structures, and indeed irregular. In short, there is no requirement that the radius ratio rules be obeyed, but they do allow us some
degree of understanding of how materials behave.
Sometimes these structures are named after a particular case; for example, the type of crystal structure found for NaCl is often called the NaCl
structure. This however can be somewhat complicated, not least because NaCl actually changes its structure to the other type of alkali halide structure under pressure. Instead, one common system is called the
Strukturbericht system, which is a way to designate structure types
based on letters and numbers. The letter codes are A for elements (see
58
A1
A2
A3
A4
A9
Structure
ccp
bcc
hcp
diamond
graphite
Table 3.2), B for binary compounds, C for AX2 compounds, D for AmXn
compounds, and so on, but quickly the scheme becomes unwieldy
since the number part labels the structure in a way that is not at all logical, and structures that are slight deformations of another structure are
not indicated as such. However, you will encounter this scheme in
your private research, and thus is worth indicating here, albeit without
being worth making a lot of fuss over.
59
Binary AX compounds
The way forward
It turns out to be useful to make reference to some of the simple elemental structures we looked at in Chapter 2, and to consider additional sites called interstitial sites or interstices that are simply
the voids int he elemental structures. We did just this when we considered the diamond structure, where we identified the octahedral
and tetrahedral interstitial sites in the ccp structure, and noted that
the diamond structure involved adding atoms to half of the tetrahedral interstices.
60
tional unit cell), and the motif can be described as having fractional coordinates:
This structure can be described as the ccp structure with the octahedral
interstices occupied by the other atom; it is shown in Interactive 3.5.
The lattice type is face-centred cubic (4 lattice points in the conven-
A = 0,0,0 ; X =
1
,0,0
2
61
1 1 1
, ,
2 2 2
Examples of materials the crystallise in this structure are all alkali halides except CsCl, CsI and CsBr, and binary oxides (such as MgO and
62
1 1 1
, ,
4 4 4
INTERACTIVE 3.7 Crystal structure of ZnS sphalerite (B3), with a facecentred cubic structure. Each atom is in tetrahedral coordination.
This structure is found for a number of important semiconductor compounds, such as CdTe, InP and GaAs.
1 2
1 2 3
, ,0 ; X = , ,
3 3
3 3 8
63
Other AX structures
It is not necessary to develop a longer list of structures, although in fact
there are not many standard types. The NiAs (B8) structure is one that is
based on the hcp structure with the filling of octahedral interstices. A
number of other structures are generated by intermetallic compounds.
64
The curious point about this structure is that it has linear SiOSi linkages, which are not energetically favourable, and instead the structure
deforms by tilting of the rigid SiO4 tetrahedra to generate a tetragonal
structure with bent SiOSi linkages. At low temperature this occurs by
a phase transition to a tetragonal structure, but at high temperature this
is a dynamic process, involving large-amplitude rotations of the SiO4
tetrahedra as shown in Movie 3.3.
The cristobalite structure is the first structure that is crystallised by annealing silica glass, and indeed the density of silica glass is much
closer to that of cristobalite than of quartz.
69
71
1 1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
, , ; X at , ,0 , ,0, , 0, ,
2 2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
1 1 1
1
1
1
, , ; B at 0,0,0 ; X at ,0,0 , 0, ,0 , 0,0,
2 2 2
2
2
2
Regardless of how we chose to write the structure, the key characteristic is that the B site has six X neighbours forming a perfect octahedron
both the A and B atoms were touching the X atoms, we would have the
following two formula based on ionic radii r :
a = 2(rB + rX)
a=
2(rA + rX)
It is never possible to satisfy both equations, and as a result the structure is liable to distort in some way. Sometimes this is achieved through
rotations of the BX6 octahedra, as indeed occurs in the type structure
CaTiO3. In other cases the distortions to accommodate size mismatch
involve the cations being slightly displaced from their symmetric sites
(which in the ideal cubic structure are sites with a centre of symmetry).
The fact that the perovskite structure is able to do so means that it can
accommodate a huge range of chemical compositions, which in turn
means that the physical properties can be finely tuned.
The X (oxygen) atoms are represented by ellipsoids that reflect the anisotropy of their thermal motion. It can be seen that the main motions
are in the direction perpendicular to the BXB direction. This is highly
suggestive of significant rotational motion of the BX6 octahedra. This is
confirmed through animations of the thermal motion of the structure,
seen in octahedral and atomic representations in Movies 3.2 and 3.3
respectively.
Perovskites can be formed both as oxides and halides (some reports of
perovskites made replacing oxygen by sulphur). In the case of oxides,
the total cation charge will need to add up to +6 | e | ; examples are
where one cation has charge +5 | e | and the other +1 | e | , such as
NaNbO3; where one cation has charge +4 | e | and the other +2 | e | ,
such as BaTiO3; and where both cations have charge +3 | e | , such as
LaAlO3. It is possible to have the A site vacant and the B site occupied
by a hexavalent cation, as in WO3. In the case of the halides the sum of
74
Polarisation (Cm2)
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
300
400
500
600
Temperature (K)
700
800
103
20
104 /
10
0
700
800
900
1000
Temperature (K)
FIGURE 3.2 Temperature dependence of the dielectric constant of
the perovskite LiTaO3 together with its inverse to show the linear
relationship with temperature.
The perovskite structure is one that you will want to be familiar with.
Materials with this structure have properties that lead to a huge impact
on modern life, along with silicon. The rapid progress in technology,
particularly digital technologies, would not be possible without the
perovskite structure.
76
Molecular crystals
Introduction
In the chapter on the crystal structure of the elements, we noted that
some elements (for example, carbon, nitrogen and the halogens) exist as molecules that retain their molecular character completely
when they form crystal structures. In this section we will look at
crystals that are formed from discrete molecules.
We will find an interesting contrast between molecular symmetry
and crystal symmetry. In some cases, the most efficient packing of
molecules disregards the symmetry of the molecule. In other cases,
77
the molecules are almost spherical and have dynamic rotational disorder, as we met previously for N2 and C60.
Herringbone structures
Many molecular crystals form crystal structures in a low-symmetry lattice often monoclinic in an arrangement that maximises packing efficiency without exploiting the symmetry of the molecule. One typical
example is the crystal structure of the molecule naphthalene, C10H8.,
shown in Interactive 3.21. The molecular symmetry has a centre of symmetry, three mirror planes and three 2-fold axes. Yet the only symmetry
78
MOVIE 3.7 Animation of the vibrations of sym-triazine in the hightemperature rhombohedral phase, viewed edge-on to the
molecular mirror plane.
Orientationally-disordered structures
The examples of molecular crystals we have shown so far involve molecules with distinct shapes. On the other hand, some molecules have
such highly-symmetric structures that they are almost spherical, and in
these cases the orientational forces within the crystal structure are not
In the field of crystal design, there is a lot of interest in hybrid structures made from metal cations and organic ligands. It is possible to design structures that are analogues of zeolite frameworks, for example
where a metal cation replaces the silicon site and the ligand replaces
the linkage oxygen site, but because of the size of the organic molecules it is possible to create structures with very large pore size and
concomitant low density.
One example is zinc imidazolate, Zn(C3N2H3)2, where the zinc atoms
bond to the nitrogen atoms in the ligand. The analogy with silica is
made complete by the fact that the zinc atoms can bond to four
ligands, forming near-perfect ZnN4 tetrahedra which appear to be reasonably rigid entities. An example is shown in Movie 3.10, which
81
82
CHAPTER 4
Bonding
Introduction
In this chapter we pose the question of what holds the atoms together in a crystal structure. One one hand the answer might be considered to be quite simple: it is the electrostatic energy coupled
with the existence of electrons. But on the other hand, the way in
which this combination works out in practice gives us a wide variation of bonding. Here we mostly consider bonding in non-metals,
and we
84
Coulomb interaction
The primary binding force in ionic crystals comes from the Coulomb interaction between charges (which is important even in crystals where the nearest bonds could be said to be covalent, such as
in SiO2).
The Coulomb energy between two ions of charge Q1 and Q2 has the
form
E=
Q1Q2
40r
15
10
Energy
5
0
5
Distance
10
FIGURE 4.1 Contributions to the Coulomb energy of the NaCl structure, where the distance scale is set as the nearest-neighbour has
distance value of 1, and where the energy is in units where the charge values and 1/40 are set to be equal to 1. The connected blue
points represent the contribution to the crystal energy neighbour-by-neighbour. The red curve represents the running sum of the
neighbour-by-neighbour points. The black line represents the summation over 8-ion cubes. The result at infinite distance is the Madelung
constant, which for the NaCl structure is equal to 1.74756.
tor here is that the energy varies as the inverse of the distance. If we assume a uniform distribution of charged sites in the crystal that is characterised by the quantity that defines the number of atoms per unit volume, a thin spherical shell of space at a distance r from an origin
charge with thickness r will have a volume 4r 2r and hence will
contain 4r 2r charged sites. Thus the energy of interaction between
the origin charge and the charges within the shell will be equal to
E=
Q1
QQ
Q2 4r 2r = 1 2 rr
40r
0
TABLE 4.1 Values of the Madelung constant for various highsymmetry cubic crystal structures, together with the relationship
between nearest-neighbour distance and the unit cell parameter.
Lattice type
d/a
NaCl (B1)
1.747567
1/2
CsCl (B2)
1.762677
3/2
Sphalerite (B3)
1.638057
3/4
Fluorite (C1)
2.519396
3/4
Cuprite (C3)
4.442482
3/4
Cristobalite (C9)
4.453383
3/8
ReO3 (D09)
2.984664
1/2
excluding examples such as FeS2), the Coulomb energy can be described by a simple formula:
Q +Q
E = NA
40 d
where Q + and Q are the charges of the cation and anion, d is the distance between nearest-neighbour ions, NA is Avogadros number, and
is a numerical constant called the Madelung constant that is a fixed
number for each structure type. Examples are given in Table 5.1.
For all other crystal structures (ionic crystals with more than 2 ion
types, cubic crystals where the ion positions are not determined by
symmetry, and crystals belonging to another lattice type; basically almost all crystal structures!) there are sophisticated methods to compute
the Coulomb energy accurately and efficiently. These are all based on
Fourier transform methods.
87
Note that the Coulomb energy of a crystal is always negative and will
become more negative as the volume is decreased.
We do have the question of what values of ionic charge to use. In some
cases it might be quite reasonable to use the formal valence charges
(for example, Q + = + | qe | and Q = | qe | , where qe is the charge of
the electron, works well for NaCl), but there will be cases where there
is some degree of covalent bonding and when charge values lower
than the formal valence charge are more realistic. For example, many
models for SiO2 have Q + = + 2.4 | qe | and Q = 1.2 | qe | instead of the
formal values +4 | qe | and 2 | qe | respectively, as determined by quantum mechanical calculations.
88
5
4
Energy
E(r) = E0 + B exp(r /)
3
2
1
0
0.8
1.2
1.4
90
Dispersion interactions
There are crystals for which the Coulomb interaction will not provide adequate binding. These include the rare-gas solids (Ne, Ar, Kr,
Xe), molecular crystals (for example, organic molecules or the molecules of the elements such as N2, F2 S8 and C60), and crystals of elements where parts of the crystal are not held together by covalent
bonds (such as the interactions between layers in the graphite structure, or between chains in Se). In many of these cases there will be
Coulomb interactions, but these will be weak. Thus the binding energy of these systems needs to come from another origin.
91
dipole moment on the second atom. The energy of this interaction will
be proportional to 12 /r 3, where 2 is the induced moment. Taking
account of our previous argument for the size of 2, we have an energy
that is proportional to 2 12 /r 6. When averaged over time, this is pro-
r
FIGURE 4.3 Two atoms whose electron density is polarised
(separated by distance r), where the darker shade represents an
excess of electrons over the the average, and lighter shade
represents a corresponding deficiency of electrons.
The most common interaction in this case is one called the dispersion
interaction (alternatively the dispersive interaction). This arises from fluctuations in the electron density in the interacting atoms.
Whilst the spatial average of the electrons in an atom will have a spherical shape, at any instance in time the charge distribution will not be
spherical. Indeed, at any instance in time the fluctuation in the charge
distribution will lead to a fluctuation electrostatic dipole moment. Although the time-average of this dipole moment will be zero, so that we
cannot obtain an interaction between two atoms merely on the basis of
the interaction between these fluctuating moments, there is a part of
the fluctuations within the two atoms that will be correlated.
Figure 4.3 illustrates this correlation. One atom is instantaneously polarised, generating an electric field. This field is seen by the second atom,
and the field will then polarise this atom further over the top of the
naturally fluctuating polarisation. The size of this polarisation will be
proportional to 2 1 /r 3, where r is the interatomic separation, 2 is the
electronic polarisability of the second atom, and 1 is the instantaneous
dipole moment on the first atom. There will be a direct interaction between the fluctuating dipole moment on the first atom and the induced
portional to 2 12 /r 6.
There are two things about this argument. First, the minus sign follows
from the fact that two aligned moments have a negative (attractive) energy. Second, the square of the average is necessarily of positive value,
and thus the overall energy of this interaction is always negative and
hence attractive.
We also remark that this energy is proportional to the square amplitude
of fluctuation of the moment. This in turn is proportional to the electronic polarisability (you do not expect the amplitude itself to be proportional to the polarisability because the amplitude will have sign and
the polarisability is a fixed constant value). Hence the energy is proportional to 12 /r 6.
It follows that if we can write the dispersion energy in the form Cr 6,
the coefficient C can be said to follow a combining law given its proportionality to the produce of the polarisabilities of the two atoms. If
we have atoms labelled i and j, it is likely to be the case that
Cij =
be determined empirically rather than by calculation we have a constraint to reduce the number of parameters; if we have a set of N different atoms, there will be N(N 1)/2 terms to be determined, but exploiting this constraint reduces the number of parameters down to N.
Researchers often combine the dispersion interaction with the repulsive
interaction to create functions that are tuned together. One example is
the Buckingham interaction:
92
E(r) = B exp(r /) Cr 6
This function is popularly used, in conjunction with electrostatic interactions, in the study of inorganic materials and crystals formed from
small organic molecules. In fact the coefficients B, and C can be
tuned to work well for a wide range of organic crystals, giving a predictive power to such models.
E(r) = 4
[( r ) ( r ) ]
6
E/
12
This function has been written in a particular way to highlight the fact
that the combination of the +ar 12 and C/r 6 terms leads to a particular interpretation. The constant represents the energy of a bond, and
the constant characterises the equilibrium separation of the two atoms, which we write as r0 = 21/6. It is easy to show that = (a /C )1/6
and = C 2 /4a. This function tends to be used when there is a strong
desire to reduce the number of variables. Given that is fixed by the
size of the atom, the only free parameter is , and with the combining
constraint the problem is made even easier.
We compare the Buckingham and Lennard-Jones potential in Figure
4.4, by assuming the minima and and the energy at the minima are the
same, and that both have the same dispersion energy. Thus the value of
C in the Buckingham potential is equal to C = 4 6. The energy at the
minimum of the Buckingham potential can be written as
= B exp(r0 /) 2
which means that B exp(r0 /) = . The minimum of the Buckingham
potential is obtained as the solution of
0.8
1.2
1.4
r/
1.6
1.8
=
r=r0
B exp(r0 /) + 6Cr07 = + 12 = 0
r0
from which we obtain = r0 /12. Thus we obtain the plots for these two
functions shown in Figure 4.4, with (by construction) the same depth of
the potential energy functions and the same behaviour at larger atomic
separations, but different behaviour at short distances. In fact the Buckingham function is badly behaved at short distances because the dispersion energy will tend towards a value of as r 0 but the repulsive
93
energy will only tend towards the value of B. Quantitatively the main
difference between the two functions is in the value of the second differential of the energy at the minimum. This is 20% larger for the
Lennard-Jones potential than for the Buckingham potential when the
Buckingham potential is tuned against the Lennard-Jones potential. The
second differential is the quantity that determines the forces constants
associated with atomic vibrations and properties such as elastic constants. And as we remarked when we discussed the repulsive interactions, here we are using the greater flexibility of the Buckingham
model (3 parameters) to fit the two-parameter Lennard-Jones model; it
would not be so easy to get as good a fit by tuning the parameters of
the Lennard-Jones function to give best agreement with an arbitrary
Buckingham function.
It should be noted that when we combine these functions with Coulomb interactions, the concept of a minimum in the function becomes
meaningless, since the minimum we require in the crystal is the minimum with respect to the crystal energy, not to specific bond parameters. Each atom will be at a minimum of the potential energy it sees
(that is the definition of the state of equilibrium, and corresponds to the
state of experiencing no force), but this potential energy will consist of
contributions from more atoms than the nearest neighbour atoms. Thus
long-range interactions that push the crystal inwards to reduce volume
will also force the nearest-neighbour atoms to be closer than they
might ordinarily like to be.
94
Hydrogen bonding
There are many crystals containing hydrogen where the interactions
considered this far are inadequate to explain the stability of the crystal structure.
Many examples are found in molecular crystals where there are
cases when a bond containing hydrogen, such as NH, will align
with a feature in another molecule. For example, the crystal structure of the molecule imidazole, C3N2H4, has an arrangement of atoms such that the NH bond in one molecule points towards a nitrogen atom in the neighbouring molecule that does not have its own
bonded H atom. This effect is primarily electrostatic in origin, because the moments along the NH bond in the first molecule are
95
97
Lattice energy
Introduction
We now define a quantity called the lattice energy, which is equivalent to the energy of the crystal structure with all atoms at rest, essentially the potential energy of the classical crystal at a temperature
of zero. Note the irony of the fact that having gone to some trouble
in this book to ensure that we use names correctly, the conventional
name for the crystal potential energy has confused the words crystal
and lattice (a similar confusion occurs for the topic of lattice dynamics, which really concerns waves travelling through the crystal with
the lattice itself having no dynamics). Thus the alternative name cohesion energy is sometimes used.
98
The lattice energy is defined easily in the case where it can decompose
into interactions between pairs of atoms that are dependent on the distance between atoms. In this case, we can denote two atoms by the labels i and j, their separation as rij and their interaction energy as ij(rij ),
the lattice energy is given as
W=
1
ij(rij )
2
ij
where the factor of 1/2 is used to cancel the fact that the sum involves
counting all pairs twice. The sum is over all atoms in the crystal and
over all neighbours. In practice the sum over all neighbours is very sensible, but the sum over the crystal is normalised to a fixed quantity
such as one mole of formula units.
Argon
Krypton
Xenon
a ()
4.466
5.313
5.656
6.129
W (kJ/mol)
1.88
7.74
11.2
16.0
In addition to giving information about the crystal structure, a calculation of the equilibrium crystal structure can be used to calculate physical properties. Equations exist to obtain properties such as dielectric,
piezoelectric and elastic constants from appropriate differentials of the
lattice energy with respect to ionic displacements and lattice strain.
The lattice energy, and its relationship to the equilibrium structure and
physical properties, is often used to tune models of interatomic forces
(namely to tune values of ionic charges and the parameters in the Buckingham model say), on the basis that the best model should be capable
of reproducing the structure and experimental data for properties.
Whilst this approach carries some risk (your model is designed to get
the right answer), it nevertheless can be useful to derive predictive models, for example for organic crystals.
99
q
+ 6B exp(a /2)
40 a /2
where we use the fact that the nearest-neighbour distance is a /2, and
where q is the charge on an ion (the cation and anion have equal but
opposite charge values, with the sign taken account of through the leading minus sign).
TABLE 4.3 Experimental data for the set of alkali halide crystals with
the NaCl structure: a is the lattice parameter, W is the lattice
energy, and K is the bulk modulus.
Li
Na
Rb
Cl
Br
a ()
4.028
5.140
5.502
6.000
W (kJ/mol)
1014.3
832.6
794.5
743.9
K (GPa)
67.1
29.8
23.8
17.1
a ()
4.634
5.640
5.978
6.474
W (kJ/mol)
897.5
764.4
726.7
683.2
K (GPa)
46.5
24.0
19.9
15.1
a ()
5.348
6.294
6.596
7.066
W (kJ/mol)
794.5
694.0
663.5
627.5
K (GPa)
30.5
17.4
14.8
11.7
a ()
5.630
6.582
6.890
7.342
W (kJ/mol)
759.3
666.8
638.8
606.6
K (GPa)
26.2
15.6
13.0
10.6
The equilibrium value of the lattice parameter is determined by the condition W/a = 0. This is written as
W
= 0 = WC /a WR /2
a
It thus follows that
=
1
W
a 1
2 (
WC )
100
70
60
K (GPa)
W (kJ/mol)
50
40
30
20
10
4
4.5
5.5
6
a ()
6.5
7.5
0
4
4.5
where V is the crystal volume and P is the pressure (note that various
texts use either B or K as the symbol for the bulk modulus, and we use
K to avoid confusion with the parameter in the BornMayer function,
but its inverse, namely the bulk compressibility, is sometimes also
given the symbol K). This gives a measure of the extent of volume reduction under pressure, with smaller volume changes corresponding to
5.5
6
a ()
6.5
7.5
large values of B. To put this into what will be a more useful form, we
use the relationship at zero temperature P = W/V to give
2W
K=V
V 2
To proceed, we will assume we can use formal charges for the ions. At
this point we should ask a question of the consistency of the data,
since the use of formal charges throughout relies on this. The data for
the lattice energy and bulk modulus are plotted against lattice parameter irrespective of ion type in Figure 4.5. The fact that the data fall onto
common curves suggests that we can treat all alkali halides within the
same model framework, which in turn relies on being able to use the
same charges for all compounds.
It is straightforward to use a spreadsheet or similar work package to determine values of and B for the model, but as numbers they are simply parameters of a model are of limited interest. What is more interest101
The calculated value of K for each system is compared with the experimental data in Figure 4.6. You can judge for yourself whether the agreement is good; personally for such a simple model with just two parameters per system, I feel that the agreement is really quite good, particularly given that different data sources give slightly different values for
the experimental data of the lattice energy and bulk modulus, and I suggest that the model captures the essence of the bonding in these materials.
70
60
Kcalc (GPa)
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
10
20
30
40
Kexpt (GPa)
50
60
70
The same can be done for many other systems, and indeed this forms
the basis of modern computational materials physics and chemistry. Different systems may require a different level of sophistication, for example accounting for charge differently, allowing electronic polarisability,
and allowing for the effects of covalency on specific bonds and to account for bending of bonds. For some materials (and the perovskites
are one particular case) such simple modelling cannot capture all the
interesting science, particularly when the phenomena are concerned
with subtle electronic effects.
ing is to test whether these models can predict the experimental values
of the bulk modulus. We rewrite the equation by noting that the volume of one mole of formula units is V = NA a 3 /4. It this follows that
4 2W
K=
9NA a a 2
It is straightforward to show that
2WC WR
2W
=
+ 2
a 2
a2
4
102
CHAPTER 5
Diffraction
Radiation beams
Preamble
We know from school science that light is diffracted when it passes
through a mask cut with lines and holes, and that each type of mask
has a characteristic pattern. This phenomenon is not due to the light
per se, but arises from the fact that the wavelength of light is not too
dissimilar to the physical dimensions of the lines and holes in the
mask. On this basis we can imagine that any radiation with a wavelength that is of the order of the spacing between atoms might be
diffracted in a way that is characteristic of the arrangement of atoms. Thus, provided we can interpret the diffraction pattern, diffrac104
So we first need to be able to generate beams of radiation with the appropriate wavelength. In terms of electromagnetic radiation, given that
the typical interatomic separation is of order 12 , the radiation we
need is within the x-ray spectrum. X-rays were discovered in 1895 by
Wilhelm Rntgen, observing them as generated when a beam of electrons of sufficient energy struck a target. This method of production of
x-rays was quickly refined and improved. In 1912 the first diffraction of
x-rays from a crystal was reported by von Laue and co-workers, and in
the following year the father and son team of William and Lawrence
Bragg interpreted the diffraction patterns and turned the observation
into a scientific method.
Many universities and research laboratories now have x-ray diffraction
facilities, optimised for measurements from single crystals and from
powder samples, all based on the idea of
105
106
107
Define origin
ki
ks
= r cos
2
= r cos
Position r
FIGURE 5.2 Path of radiation beam scattered by two particles.
The radiation beam is defined as a wave with a given direction and
wavelength, both of which are encapsulated in the quantity called the
wave vector, which is given the symbol k. This is defined such that the
vector is aligned with the direction in which the wave front travels, and
the modulus of the wave vector is defined by the wavelength:
2
k =
For several reasons, as we will see, wave vector is a much more useful
quantity than wavelength.
What we are more interested in is how the scattering from a collection
of particles causes interference effects, because interpreting these interference effects is the key to understanding structure. We start by considering the scattering of two particles. What we chose as an origin is arbi-
trary, so we place one particle at the origin and one at a position r relative to the origin. The situation is encompassed in Figure 5.1, which
shows the path when the wave is scattered by two particles through the
same angle. In this figure, one beam travels further than the second
beam. If the incoming beam has a common wave front, the scattering
from two particles at random orientation to the wave front will introduce a change in path length for one particle relative to the other.
The additional path length in Figure 5.1 is equal to 1 + 2. If we define
the wave vector of the incoming beam as ki, the angle identified in
Figure 5.1 and hence the value of 1 can be obtained from the vector
dot product ki r:
ki r =
2
2
r cos =
Similarly we can define angle and the value of 2 from the dot product with the scattering wave vector ks:
ks r =
2
2
r cos(180 ) = 2
The important variable here is neither the wave vector of the incoming
wave nor the wave vector of the scattering wave, but the difference between these two wave vectors, and thus we give this its own symbol
Q = ki ks
108
and we note that the phase difference from the scattering from the two
particles is equal to Q r. Thus the scattering of the wave from these
two particles will be moderated by the factor
F(Q) = 1 + exp(iQ r)
If we have a collection of particles, each with position rj relative to
some origin, the modulation in amplitude of a wave that is scattered is
given as
F(Q) =
exp(iQ rj )
Here we have explicitly assumed that the scattering from each particle
is the same. We can account for this by a simply per-particle multiplicative factor:
F(Q) =
fj exp(iQ rj )
= ki
+ ks
4 2
2ki ks = 2 (2 2 cos )
4
sin
Where this function is important is in considering the scattering of xrays from the electrons in an atom. We are not able to identify specific
positions for the electrons, but instead the wave functions define a function for the electron density. This function gives us one important limiting case, namely forward scattering where = 0 and Q = 0:
F(0) = (r) dV
In the case of scattering of x-rays by the electrons in an atom, the amplitude of forward scattering is simply equal to the integral of the electron
density and hence to the number of electrons multiplied by the charge
of the electron.
109
(r rj )
(r rj ) = 0 when r rj
Thus the function is defined as having a non-zero value only when the
position is the same as the position of the particle. Since the particle
exists with probability 1, we are consistent with the value of the integral of the Dirac delta function:
F(Q) =
formalism.
(r) dr = 1
We next need to know the Fourier transform of the Dirac delta function. This is best evaluated in the infinitesimal limit, where separate the
Fourier integral into the region of space immediately in the vicinity of
the point, where we can say that the factor exp(iQ r) does not vary
with r, and the rest of space. In the rest of space the integral is equal to
zero, so we only need to consider the integral within the vicinity of the
point. This is best illustrated in one dimension, where we consider the
variable x instead of r:
(x xj ) exp(iQx) dx =
xj +
(x xj ) exp(iQx) dx
= exp(iQxj )
xj +
(x xj ) dx = exp(iQxj )
(r rj ) exp(iQ r) dV =
exp(iQ rj )
Convolution
To exploit the use of Fourier transforms to study scattering from crystalline materials, it turns out to be useful to define the process of convolution. This is used extensively in defining a crystal structure, in that the
crystal structure can be defined in terms of placing an identical set of
atoms into the space associated with each lattice point (the unit cell).
This process can be identified with the convolution operation, which
formally is the process of replacing all points of one function with a
copy of a second function to obtain a third function. This is written
mathematically as
f (x) = g(x) h(x)
and is defined in one dimension such that
f (x) = g(w) h(x w) dw = g(x w) h(w) dw
111
Convolution theorem
The convolution theorem states that the Fourier transform of a convolution is the product of the Fourier transforms of the separate functions.
The Fourier transforms are defined as
F(q) = g(x) exp(iqx) dx
and similarly for G(q) and H(q). We can write the Fourier transform of
the convolution as
F(q) =
g(w)h(x w)exp(iqx)dwdx
112
sin(qa)/qa
This is simply the expression of F(q) = G(q) H(q). This is a fantastically useful theorem in science for a wide range of applications.
qa
FIGURE 5.4 The sinc function.
equal to multiplied by an integer, that is when q = n /a where n in
an integer, except for the case n = 0, where instead the function has a
value of 1 . The width of the sinc function might be defined as twice
the point at which it has value of 1/2. This has value q = 1.207 /a.
The point is that the width of the Fourier transform is proportional to
1/a, where we recall that a is the width of the original function. Thus if
we have one function with a peak, its Fourier transform will also have a
peak but with a width that is inversely proportional to the width of the
first function.
10
Scattering factor
Si4+ cation
Al3+ cation
Mg2+ cation
4
2
0
0.0
F anion
0.5
1.0
1.5
sin /
FIGURE 5.5 Amplitude of the scattering of x-rays from four
isoelectronic ions
the electrons in an atom. From what we have done so far, we can immediately say that the scattering of x-rays from an atom will give the
Fourier transform of its electron density (after accounting for the angular dependence of the scattering of electromagnetic radiation from a
charge particle, and accounting for any polarisation of the x-ray beam).
In Figure 5.4 we show the amplitude of scattering of x-rays from four
isoelectronic ions as a function of sin / = Q /4. The extent to which
the scattering functions are spread out in Q is determined by the charge
on the atomic nucleus, with the F anion having the lowest nuclear
charge and the Si4+ cation having the largest. The larger charge means
that the electron orbitals are closer to the nucleus, as reflected in the
ionic radii given in the Appendix. Thus Si4+ is the smallest ion of the
four, and thus we expect its Fourier transform to extend further.
114
last convolution is that of the atoms position in the motif and the
spread of positions arising from thermal motion.
Thus formally we can write this as Crystal Structure = Lattice Motif
Atomic Electron Density Thermal Motion. The scattering of x-rays
will therefore be given as
F(Q) = FT(Lattice) FT(Motif) FT(Electrons) FT(Atomic Motions)
Our problem is made easier by the fact that we simply calculate the
Fourier transforms of the separate components and multiply them together.
U,V,W
(r (Ua + V b + Wc))
U,V,W
We use the property of the Fourier transform of the Dirac delta function
discussed previously to reduce this function to
R(Q) =
U,V,W
where the imaginary component cancels because the lattice has a centre of symmetry. The sum is over an infinite number of terms, and will
only have a non-zero value for a set of values of Q that cause the argu-
know nothing of these three vectors a*, b* and c*, but we label them
as such by analogy with the crystal lattice vectors a, b and c. We thus
require that
(ha* + kb* + lc*) (Ua + V b + Wc) = n 2
for all values of U, V and W, which in turn will set constraints on values
of h, k and l and on the vectors a*, b* and c*.
Now we need to decide how to work with these new quantities. Let us
set the case that V = W = 0. Thus the phase relation gives us
(ha* + kb* + lc*) Ua = n 2
We can define the direction of the vectors such that b* a = c* a = 0.
This means that we would be left with
hUa* a = n 2
We are free to make whatever definition we like, so we could set
a* a = 2. This means that h U must be an integer (any integer), and
this can only be achieved if h in turn is an integer. We can perform a
similar analysis for the other quantities, such that
a* a = b* b = c* c = 2
and that all other dot products, such as a* b and c* a are all equal to
zero. In turn this means that the vector a* is perpendicular to both b
116
b* c a
c* a b
bc
a (b c)
b* = 2
ca
a (b c)
c* = 2
ab
a (b c)
The denominators are all the same because the combinations of products are all the same and equal to the volume of the unit cell.
Now we consider the general case:
(ha* + kb* + lc*) (Ua + V b + Wc) = 2(hU + kV + lW )
which is an integer multiplied by 2.
of waves, be they the waves that are diffracted in an experiment designed to measure the crystal structure, or the waves of atoms vibrations (including sound), or the waves of electrons in metals. The reciprocal lattice vectors are special vectors in this space. Here we are beginning to see that they are the vectors associated with diffraction, but for
vibrations and electrons they are vectors where we find a new translational symmetry for the wave vectors.
are restricted to the set of integers. This new lattice is called the reciprocal lattice, the name chosen perhaps because it is the Fourier inverse of
the original lattice, and perhaps because the scale of the vectors in this
space have dimensions of 1/length.
117
This point is illustrated in Figures 5.6 and 5.7, which show photographs
recording the scattering of electrons and x-rays respectively from crystalline materials. The key observation is that scattering is limited to specific points in reciprocal space, which correspond to the points of the
reciprocal lattice.
We now relate the description of the reciprocal lattice to the arrangements of planes of atoms in the crystal. Consider the situation shown in
Figure 5.8. We say that this plane intersects the unit cell at distances
a /h, b/k and c/l along the three vectors of the unit cell, where h, k and
l are integers. There will be a parallel plane that passes through the origin, as part of an infinite set of planes. We can define vectors within
118
the plane that will of course have a zero dot product with the plane
normal. We consider one that connects two intercepts
r=
Incoming beam
of radiation
Scattered beam
of radiation
1
1
a b
h
k
dhk
we have
r d*hkl =
1
1
a b (ha* + kb* + lc*)
(h
k )
plane, and hence the separation of planes. Taking p as any of the intercepts of the plane with the unit cell vectors, say p = a /h, we have
1
d*hkl
2
d*hkl
It thus follows that the spacing of planes denoted by the three indices
hkl, which we denote as dhkl, is given as
dhkl = 2 / d*hkl
180 2
recall that we also obtained a value for the modulus of this vector in
terms of the radiation wavelength and scattering angle. Thus we can
write
dhkl = 2 / d*hkl = 2
4 sin
119
Miller indices
The set of integers h, k and l is used to define a particular planes in a
crystal, as per Figures 5.6 and Figure 5.8. These planes are not not just
a ingle plane of atom, but the complete set of parallel planes displaced
relative to each in a way that reflects the translational symmetry (Figure
5.10). The three numbers that define a set of planes have their own
name, Miller indices, and are also designated by the three integers we
have used. They are enclosed in round brackets to denote the set of parallel planes, (hkl ), with the set of equivalent planes being denoted by
curly brackets as {hkl}. For example, the (100) plane of a crystal with
cubic symmetry is part of the set {100} which includes also (010),
(001), and also (100), (010) and (001).
/2 = dhkl cos(90 )
which immediately gives us the Bragg law. This derivation is rather
quicker than approaching the problem via the reciprocal lattice, but
we nevertheless need the reciprocal lattice for a complete analysis.
Actually the complete set of negatives do not make sense from one perspective, in that the set of planes designated by (h, k, l ) are equivalent
to those designated by (h, k, l ). What is different, however, is how we
define the plane normal. The vector normal to the planes is the vector
d*hkl, and for the set of planes (h, k, l ) the plane normal will point in the
site directions.
Thermal motion
Thermal motion arising from harmonic waves will give a Gaussian distribution of atomic displacements. The Fourier transform of a Gaussian
is also a Gaussian. In the case of harmonic waves, the thermal motion
in the isotropic approximation is described by a Gaussian function of
2
the form exp (uj2Qhkl
/2), where uj2 is the mean square displacement
of x-ray diffraction, the inverse Fourier transform will give the electron
density:
(x, y, z) =
hkl
This quantity is called the structure factor, and provides the link between the structure and diffraction. Note that we now use the symbol
F(hkl ) in place of F(Qhkl ) following normal convention.
If we could measure a complete set of structure factors we could perform the inverse Fourier transform and obtain the structure. In the case
121
amples were solved in the very early days of crystallography. Most crystals do not have the positions of the atoms determined exactly by symmetry, but symmetry will help to reduce the number of coordinates.
which has a value of zero if h + k + l is an odd number. Similar relationships between the values of the Miller indices and non-zero structure
factors exist for other centred lattices.
The first task is to identify the Bravais lattice. The unit cell parameters
will be able to identify the lattice types (triclinic, monoclinic etc), although there are cases when two unit cell lengths are coincidentally
indistinguishable, and when unit cell angles are coincidentally too
close to 90 to be sure that they are not of that value. The existence of
a centred lattice will be clear from the diffraction patterns because
some reflections will be systematically absent. We take as an example
a body-centred lattice. The structure factor based on the conventional
unit cell will contain terms of the form
exp 2i(h x + k y + lz) + exp 2i (h(x + 1/2) + k(y + 1/2) + l(z + 1/2))
This can be written as
exp 2i(h x + k y + lz) (1 + exp i(h + k + l ))
The second task is to identify the symmetry of the space group, having
significantly reduced the number of possibilities by identifying the Bravais lattice. The diffraction pattern will have a symmetry that reflects
the underlying crystal symmetry. For example, planes of relection and
rotation axes will be seen in the symmetry of the diffraction pattern.
Consider a crystal with a mirror plane perpendicular to the z axis, such
that an atom at position x, y, z will have a copy at x, y, z . The structure
factor will contain terms of the form
exp 2i(h x + hk + lz) + exp 2i(h x + hk lz)
Clearly if we reverse the sign of l we have the same result. Thus in the
case of a crystal with this mirror plane it follows that F(hkl ) = F(hkl ).
A similar result will follow for rotation axes.
Symmetry operations that contain a translation give unambiguous evidence of their existence in the form of systematic absences, namely
sets of structure factors that have zero value because of the symmetry.
Consider the case of a screw axis along the y axis, so that a position
x, y, z has an equivalent position x, y + 1/2,z. The structure factor will
contain terms of the form
exp 2i(h x + k y + lz) + exp 2i (h x + k(y + 1/2) lz)
When h = l = 0, this can be written as
exp 2i(k y) (1 + exp ik)
123
This will equal zero for all odd values of k. Similar conditions exist for
glide planes. From these systematic absences it is possible to identify
the presence of screw axes and glide planes. On this basis, coupled
with the symmetry of the diffraction pattern, it is possible to narrow
down the set of symmetry operations in a particular crystal.
We note however that there is one problem that will haunt us, and that
is that by definition the sets of structure factors has its own centre of
symmetry, namely that
interpret these peaks, and there will be many of them, but often we are
helped by symmetry.
F(hkl ) = F(hkl )
This is known as Friedels law. It arises from the fact that the complex
conjugate of the structure factor can be written as F*(hkl ) = F(hkl ),
and by construction
F(hkl )
we might expect to find some cases where we are left with some ambiguity.
jk
For example, suppose we have a crystal with a mirror symmetry perpendicular to the y axis. Thus an atom at position x, y, z will have an equivalent atom at position x, y, z. Thus the vector between these atoms will
lie at 0,2y,0, and the Patterson function should show a peak at this special position. Similarly, if the structure has a mirror plane such that an
atom at position x, y, z will have an equivalent at x, y, z, and the Patterson function will show a peak on the plane 2x,0,2z. Thus it will become possible to obtain estimates of the atomic coordinates from the
Patterson function. Although there will be, in principle, many peaks, it
turns out that in practice if the crystal contains one atom that is a lot
heavier than the other atoms (that is, it has many more electrons), the
Patterson function will be dominated by peaks associated only with
this atom. Given that this atom will contribute heavily to the value of
the structure factor, by identifying the positions of the heavy atoms it
will be possible to identify the phases of many of the stronger structure
factors.
Nowadays the Patterson function is not necessary because we have statistical methods called direct methods to identify the phases of
structure factors directly from the data. Discussion of these methods
takes us beyond the scope of these notes, but the gist is readily explained. The statistics of structure factors works best if we replace each
atom by an equivalent point atom, that is, we deconvolve out the elec124
f j2
gj2
fj gj
nj cos(2iH X)
where we denote the Miller indices hkl as the set H, the coordinates
x yz by the set X, and the dot product H X = h x + k y + lz. nj represents the per-atom normalisation factor, and the overall normalisation
n = 1.
requires that
j
j
fj gj = UH
We also have
f j2 =
nj = 1
We can write
gj2 =
nj cos2(2iH X) =
1
1
nj (1 + cos(2i2H X)) = (1 + U2H)
2
2
j
hkl
Fobs(hkl ) Fcalc(hkl )
where Fobs(hkl ) and Fcalc(hkl ) are the observed (that is, measured and
normalised) and calculated structure factors respectively. Note that at
this stage we do not explicitly need to know the phases of the structure
factors; these will be set by the crystal structure at each stage of the
least squares procedure.
125
Once this process is completed we will have a very good determination of the crystal structure, and with modern data good precision is
possible (third decimal place of the fractional coordinates at worst).
126
Glasses
What is a glass?
The title of this section assumes there is a generally accepted answer, but this is far from the truth. We have some general observations that can guide us to a pragmatic, if not ideal, answer.
A glass is an apparently solid object formed by rapid cooling of a
liquid. Quite how rapid will depend on the solid; a silicate liquid
can be cooled quite slowly and still form a glass (this is exploited by
glass makers), but a metal has to be cooled incredibly quickly to
form a glass phase.
A glass does not have a well-defined crystal structure, as can be
seen in a diffraction experiment. Whereas a crystal will give well128
FIGURE 6.1 Representation of the arrangement of atoms in a twodimensional continuous random network, showing no long-range
order but nevertheless a high degree of short-range order with a
clear average bond length and bond angle, and with each atom
having three nearest neighbours.
neighbours. It will follow that each atom will also have a reasonably
well-defined set of second and third neighbours too.
There are a number of well-understood glass-forming materials. The
most common is any material containing silicon, ranging from pure silicon dioxide, SiO2, which we have met before when considering crystals of simple formulae, to various compounds that could variously be
described in terms of the general formula (SiO2)x(Al2O3)y(XO)z(Y2O)1-x-y,
where X is a divalent cation such as Mg2+ or Ca2+, and Y is an alkaline
cation such as Na+ or K+. In this case the Si4+ and Al3+ cations form tet129
bonds is slow, and in part because the energy of the disordered state
is not much higher than the energy of the ordered structure.
Another important family of glasses are materials containing S and Se
anions, often called the chalcogenides. These materials also form covalent networks, albeit with lower dimension than the threedimensional networks of the silicate glasses.
A number of organic materials can also form glasses. In part this is
because the shapes of the molecules allow them to become trapped
in their orientations within the liquid state as they are cooled.
131
FIGURE 6.4 First shells of neighbours for several atoms in the twodimensional continuous random network.
around the first-neighbour distance. Indeed, if we integrate over a band
of distances than encompasses the first neighbour distance, we expect
R+
n(r)dr = 42r
R+
g12(r)dr = N1
133
g(r)
4
SiSi
4
2
T (r)
3
2
SiO
20
0
0
r ()
10
12
14
FIGURE 6.6 PDF function T(r) for silica glass, measured by neutron
scattering.
Figure 6.6 shows an experimental measurement of the PDF of amorphous silica. Actually the plot shown is not g(r) but a related function
T(r) = 4rg(r); the key point about this function is that it is proportional to g(r) multiplied by r. Hence at higher values of r, where
g(r) 1, T(r) becomes a straight line. The data were obtained from neutron scattering (we will discuss the methodology later).
The PDF shows a number of features at low r, which as seen in the
pure g(r) functions obtained by using the experimental data to obtain a
model for the structure. The first two distinct peaks are due to SiO and
OO nearest-neighbour distances. The average distances are read from
10
0
OO
6
4
2
0
6
8
r ()
10
12
14
the peak positions. The mean SiO (around 1.6 ) and O-O (around
2.6 ) distances are consistent with the existence of near-perfect SiO4
tetrahedra as noted earlier. The third peak corresponds to the first SiSi
stance. It is much weaker than the other two peaks because it is
broader, because the scattering factors are weaker for Si, and because
there are only half as many silicon atoms as oxygen atoms. It represent
a mean distance of around 3.2 , which is consistent with a mean Si
OSi angle of 150. Beyond this distance there is an overlap of various
peaks in the individual g(r) functions and indeed overlap of the different functions, which means that interpretation of the information
within the PDF is difficult without some modelling activity.
135
fj exp(iQ rj )
136
S(Q) =
1
F(Q
N
1
fj fk exp (iQ (rj rk ))
N
j,k
1 2
exp(iQ (rj rk ) = 4 d exp(iQrjk cos ) sin d
0
0
We substitute x = cos and hence that sin d = dx, and perform the
trivial integration over , to obtain
sin(Qrjk )
1 +1
exp(iQ (rj rk ) = 2 exp(iQrjk x) dx = Qr
jk
1
Hence we can write the scattering intensity as
sin(Qrjk
1
S(Q) =
fj fk
N
Qrjk
j,k
Note that this function includes terms where j = k, which we now separate from the scattering from pairs of different atoms:
S(Q) =
sin(Qrjk
1
1
f j2 +
fj fk
N
N
Qrjk
j
j,k
Now we can make use of the PDF. We define cm as the relative concentration of atoms of species type m; thus in SiO2 cSi = 1/3 and cO = 2/3.
Thus the first term simply becomes
1
f j2 =
cm f m2
N j
m
The second term is a double sum over all atoms. The first of these can
be replaced by a sum over atom types, since we are considering the average behaviour associated with each atom type. The second sum is the
sum over all neighbours, which can be replaced by scanning distances
and using the probability of finding the next atom. This probability is
defined by g(r), but we do need to be careful about what happens at
large distance. Therefore we use instead the probability 4nr 2 multiplied by the correlation g(r) 1, and the bit we subtract will be added
back in at the end. On this basis, we can write
sin(Qrjk
1
sin(Qr)
fj fk
= 4
cmcn fm fnr 2 (gmn(r) 1)
dr
N
Qr
Qr
jk
j,k
m,n
The bit we left out when we went from g(r) to g(r) 1 integrates to a
term that is only non-zero at Q = 0. Thus we can write
S(Q) =
cm f m2 + 4
m,n
sin(Qr)
dr + S0
Qr
137
where S0 is the term that exists at Q = 0, which actually is never measured in an experiment.
0.4
sin(Qr)
4
cmcn fm fnr (gmn(r) 1)
dr = S(Q)
cm f m2 S0 = i(Q)
Qr
m,n
m
2
m,n
c c f f g (r) 1) = Qi(Q)sin(Qr) dr
m n m n ( mn
m,n
0.2
0.0
-0.2
0
i(Q)
m,n
cmcn fm fn (gmn(r) 1)
The functions D(r) and Qi(Q) are the primary functions for measurements of the PDF. The i(Q) function for amorphous silica is shown in
Figure 6.8. Both D(r) and Qi(Q) oscillate in value about zero at high
values of r and Q respectively, which is achieved by the subtractions in
both cases. And because of the subtractions, the functions are negative
at low r and Q, and because both these functions contain a factor of r
and Q respectively they vary as r and Q at the start.
There is one very important point to note, which is always a problem
with performing Fourier transforms in practical terms regardless of what
sort of data we mean. In our case, we can measure Qi(Q) only over a
10
20
Q (-1)
30
40
the function to be transformed has zero value at Qmax, and it significantly reduces the ripples in the transform. However, because of the
convolution theorem, when we transform Qi(Q) M(Q) we obtain
D(r) FT[M(Q)], where FT[M(Q)] is the Fourier transform of M(Q). We
have previously identified that the sinc function is the Fourier transform
of the box function, and hence the Fourier transform of M(Q) is in turn
a box function. Thus the experimentally-derived D(r) function is broadened by convolution with a box function of full width 2 /Qmax.
139
CHAPTER 7
Magnetic materials
Magnetic ions
A number of atoms or ions have magnetic moments, although by no
means all. There are three origins of magnetism in atoms. First is the
magnetic moment of the nuclear, which arises when the numbers of
protons and neutrons in the nucleus are such that there is not a cancellation of the moments of these particles. We will find, however,
that in terms of the magnetic structures of materials the nuclear moments are not important (although they are extremely important in
experimental methods such as magnetic resonance techniques, and
are are important at very low temperatures).
The second origin of atomic magnetism is from the spin orbital angular moment of the electrons. Clearly in open-shell ions with odd
141
S = 1/2
L =2
S = 3/2
S=1
L =3
S=2
L =3
L =2
S = 5/2
L =0
S=2
L =2
S = 3/2
L =3
S=1
L =3
S = 1/2
L =2
S=0
L =0
There is a separate rule that determines how the vectors S and L combine to form J.
Similar rules are found for the filling of the 7 partially-empty f levels (lz
from +3 to 3) as found in rare-earth metals. These rules are called
Hunds rules.
There is one difference between transition metal and rare earth metal
ions. In the transition metals, the unfilled shells are in the outer part of
the atom, which means that when the ion is within a crystal these electrons see the fields from the local environment, and the net effect is
that the orbital angular momentum does not operate to contribute to
the overall magnetic moment, which is given by the spin angular moment only. This is not the case for the rare earth ions; in their case the
unfilled shells are below some closed shells and are shielded from the
effects of the crystalline fields.
The size of the magnetic moments can be measured by measuring the
magnetisation of a sample when in an applied external magnetic field.
Broadly it is found that the qualitative description given here is correct,
although there is a small number of exceptions. The response of a crys142
143
Response of a material to an
applied magnetic field
Diamagnetism
We consider first a relatively weak effect, which is found in all materials regardless of whether there is a net magnetic moment in the atoms. Without going into detailed analysis, the key point is that in a
classical sense we can think about the orbital angular momentum
corresponding to an electric current loop in the atom. Application
of a magnetic field, by Lenzs law, will generate an opposing current
that will generate a magnetisation in the opposite direction to the
applied field. Thus we can write
M = Bext
144
where Bext is the externally-applied magnetic field, and where for this
effect , which is called the susceptibility (formally = M/B), has a
negative value.
Paramagnetism
Of more interest is the effect of a magnetic field on a crystal containing
non-interacting magnetic ions. Here we discuss the behaviour of the
magnetic susceptibility as a function of temperature, but using plausibility arguments rather than detailed thermodynamic analysis.
At high temperatures, the magnetic ions have a lot of thermal energy,
and a high value of the externally-applied magnetic field is needed to
align the moments. On cooling, the thermal opposition to ordering is
lessened, until at zero temperature it is very easy to order the magnetic
moments. Thus we expect the paramagnetic susceptibility is expected
to have the form
= C/T
This temperature dependence, known as Curies law, is found for many
paramagnetic systems. It can be derived quite easily from thermodynamics, although like many laws it is obtained as a limiting behaviour
(here for the case of a weak field). The constant C can be calculated
from the magnetic properties of the ion, and in particular it is directly
determined by the size of the magnetic moment. From quantitative
measurements of the susceptibility is it therefore possible to obtain values for the magnetic moments, which can be compared with the analysis given in the previous section. It is generally found that there is excellent agreement, albeit with a few exceptions.
145
Magnetic interactions
Phase transitions
In some cases the magnetic moments interact, which leads to a
spontaneous ordering of the atomic moments. Once the moments
order, they create a magnetisation. It is possible (but for the moment
dont take this literally) that this magnetisation, M, then acts with the
external magnetic field to create a new field
Beff = Bext + M
When we apply this to the Curie law, we obtain
146
M=
C(Bext + M )
T
C
Bext
T C
It thus follows that the susceptibility now has a new form, known as
the Curie-Weiss law:
=
C
T Tc
Exchange interactions
We now understand that the interactions between two magnetic ions
occurs as a result of their overlapping wave functions. There is a coupling between the spin angular momentum of electrons in two atoms
of the form
E = J Si Sj
which is purely a result of quantum mechanics. This interaction is
much stronger than the result of direct magnetisation.
Direct exchange occurs when two magnetic ions are touching such
that their electrons overlap. However, this is very rare.
Super-exchange is a mechanism in which two magnetic ions can interact via an intermediate ion. It is illustrated in Figure 7.1 for the case of
two d-electron ions (such as Mn2+) interacting via an intermediate O2
anion. In this case the moment on one cation interactions with the electrons in one lobe of electrons in the oxygen in a way that favours antiparallel alignment. This immediately polarises the electron on the opposite lobe of the oxygen atom, which causes the second cation to have
147
Co
Ni
Gd
EuO
EuS
1043
1394
631
289
70
16.5
Ordered phases
The scenario described above is for the case when the magnetic order
leads to a macroscopic magnetic polarisation. For materials containing
only one type of magnetic ion, this will typically involve all the magnetic moments being aligned together. This phenomenon is called ferromagnetism. A ferromagnetic phase transition will occur at a fixed temperature, and below the transition temperature the magnetisation will
increase gradually up to a saturation value namely when all the moments are perfectly aligned at low temperature. Some examples are
given in Table 7.1.
In a ferromagnet, the exchange interactions favour parallel arrangement of the moments, but in fact this is not the common case. It is
more usual for exchange interactions to favour alignment in opposite
directions. In the magnetic crystal, this type of moment orientation also
occurs at a particular transition temperature, but there is no bulk magnetisation. Instead, the existence of the magnetic order can be seen in
diffraction experiments.
MnF2
MnO
CoO
FeO
Cr2O3
Fe2O3
Fe3O4
CoFe2O4
NiFe2O4
67
116
292
116
307
950
858
793
858
a simple lattice translation are no long equivalent. This means that the
unit cell is now a multiple of the unit cell described by the atoms. In
the case of MnO it is clear that the unit cell doubles along the a, b and
c axes (although in fact it is possible to define a smaller primitive unit
cell). This means that the (100) Bragg peak, which is absent in a facecentred cubic diffraction pattern, now corresponds to the (200) reflection of the new unit cell, and hence is visible in a neutron diffraction
measurements (the neutron has its own magnetic moment, and thus is
able to detect magnetic ordering in a material).
A number of examples are given in Table 7.2.
The magnetic susceptibility for an antiferromagnet needs to be described in terms of the two magnetic sublattices, each of which will
generate an equivalent of the M term that we used to describe the susceptibility of a ferromagnet. But now the interaction is negative, and
were we to follow a similar analysis that derived the susceptibility of
the ferromagnet but carried by by sublattice, we would find that the susceptibility varies as
=
C
T + T
564
567
A third state of ordering occurs for cases when there is more than one
type of magnetic ion; the mineral magnetite, formula Fe3O4, containing
both Fe2+ and Fe3+ cations is an example. These materials are called ferrimagnetic. In many cases, and Fe3O4 is one, the magnetic moments of
the two ions do not cancel and there is a net magnetisation in the ordered state.
Several examples of ferrimagnetic materials are given in Table 7.3.
The fourth state we will discuss is where the magnetic moments order
in a spiral structure, a property called spiral magnetism or helical magnetism. We consider a simple energy of the form
E = NS 2(J1 cos J2 cos 2) = NS 2 (J1 cos J2(2 cos2 1))
where is the angle between neighbouring moments, J1 is the exchange interaction for nearest neighbours, and J2 is the exchange interaction for second-nearest neighbours (hence the 2 argument in the cosine). This equation holds for interactions in a one-dimensional system,
or between ferromagnetic planes. The equilibrium structure is that for
which E / = 0:
(J1 4J2 cos )sin = 0
cos =
J1
4J2
149
ues of J2), and for all negative values of J2 either of these states is favoured over the spiral state. However, when J2 is positive, the secondneighbour interactions oppose the same alignment of second-nearest
neighbours, and if they are strong enough they make the system prefer
the spiral ordering. We take the case of positive J1 (the argument is exactly the same for negative J1 but in that case we would compare with
the antiferromagetic energy). The spiral state is preferred if the energy if
the spiral phase is lower than that of the ferromagnetic state:
J12
Eferro > Espiral NS (J1 J2) > NS
+ J2
( 8J2
)
2
This reduces to
J12
J12
(J1 J2) >
J2 8J1 + 16J2 >
8J2
J2
INTERACTIVE 7.2 Example of a spiral magnetic structure in a simple
cubic structure.
The energies for the different cases are
= 0 Eferro = NS 2(J1 J2)
= Eantiferro = + NS 2(J1 + J2)
J1
J12
2
cos =
Espiral = NS
+ J2
4J2
( 8J2
)
The ferromagnetic case is favoured over the antiferromagnetic case
when J1 > 0 for all negative values of J2 (regardless of whether we have
ferromagnetic or antiferromagnetic ordering, the second neighbours always have the same orientations, which are favoured by negative val-
150
Bulk magnetisation
Our final point concerns the macroscopic measurements of magnetisation. In principle it would seem that all you might need to do is
put a sample into an instrument that merely measures magnetism
and you would get an answer. However, it is not as simple as this,
mostly because different parts of the sample may form a net magnetic moment independent from other parts of the sample, with the
result that the overall sample magnetisation remains close to zero.
Figure 7.2 shows and example of how a material can form small regions called domains in which the magnetisation points along
different directions. The shapes of these domains will be determined
by a number of factors associated with the interactions between
151
M,P
P= E
M= B
M0,P0
Bc,Ec
Bc,Ec
B,E
M0,P0
152
Hysteresis loops are relatively easy to understand. At high field the magnetisation is the equilibrium value for the temperature plus a contribution caused by the applied field, namely M = M0 + B. When the direction of B is reversed, the magnetisation doesnt flip but instead is reduced slightly from the value of M0 until a certain field strength, called
the coercive field strength and given the symbol Bc, is reached. Only
then is the magnetisation reversed.
Clearly it costs energy to reverse the magnetisation, and to understand
this we need to have a picture of what is happening at the atomic level.
It costs a lot of energy to flip the direction of a single atomic moment
because of its interaction with its neighbours, so the easiest place for
the moments to flip is at the domain wall. What you might expect,
therefore, is for the applied field to move the domain walls. Unfortunately they are pinned by defects within the crystal; Figure 7.4 shows
an example of the sort of defect that will trap or pin a magnetic domain wall.
153
Appendices
360/n, where n is an integer, brings the structure back onto itself. For
three-dimensional crystals, the only allowed values of n are 1, 2, 3, 4
and 6. The case n = 1 does nothing of course, but is included within
the formalism specifically to denote the absence of other symmetry.
Transformations for different values of n assuming that the rotation axis
is along the z axis are
n = 2 : x, y, z ; x, y, z
n = 3 : x, y, z ; y, x y, z ; x + y, x, z
n = 4 : x, y, z ; y, x, z ; x, y, z ; y, x, z
n = 6 : x, y, z ; y, x y, z ; x + y, x, z ;
x, y, z ; y, x + y, z ; x y, x, z
Rotoinversion symmetry is rather harder to imagine. It is a two stage
process, involving a rotation by 360/n followed by the transformation
x, y, z x, y, z. The rotoinversion symmetry is given the symbol n. Thus
we have the following transformations, where the rotation axis is assumed to be along z:
1 : x, y, z x, y, z
155
2 : x, y, z ; x, y, z
3 : x, y, z ; y, x y, z ; x + y, x, z ;
x, y, z; y, x + y, z ; x y, x, z
4 : x, y, z ; y, x, z ; x, y, z ; y, x, z
6 : x, y, z ; y, x y, z ; x + y, x, z ;
x, y, z ; y, x y, z ; x + y, x, z
In this case, 1 corresponds to what is called a centre of symmetry,
namely that any point has a corresponding image where all coordinates have reversed sign. This is a particularly important symmetry for
the properties of crystals. The case 2 is equivalent to the operation of a
mirror plane.
It turns out that there are 32 point groups consistent with the presence
of a crystal lattice. This is slightly fewer than the maximum number of
permutations because some of the combinations are equivalent; this is
illustrated by the previously-noted fact that the 2 symmetry is equivalent to a mirror symmetry.
Symmetry of lattices
A lattice is a collection of points in a periodic arrangement. By construction, all lattices contain a centre of symmetry.
The seven lattice types are given in the table above. There is scope for
confusion here, because the table actually has eight entries. This is because the rhombohedral type is a special form of the trigonal lattice.
Point groups
These symmetry operations can be combined to form sets, which are
know as the point groups. For example, consider the a simple example
of combining a 2-fold axis with a perpendicular mirror plane. This is
given the symbol 2/m, and there are 4 positions generated by the combination; one as the starting point, one produced by the 2-fold axis,
one generated by the mirror plane, and one generated by the operation
of both the 2-fold rotation and the mirror plane. This set of equivalent
coordinates is
2/m : x, y, z; x, y, z; x, y, z; x, y, z
Note that the operation of both the 2-fold rotation and mirror plane has
generated the centre of symmetry.
156
B. Bravais lattices
The Bravais lattices are 14 lattice formed from the seven lattice types
and now allowing for lattice points to also exist at face centres and
case where there is a lattice point at the centre of each of the faces of
the unit cell, C-centred corresponds to the case where this is a lattice
point in the centre of the face opposite the c lattice vector, and Icentred corresponds to the case where there is a lattice point at the centre of the unit cell. Note that it is also possible to refined A-centred and
B-centred lattices, where there are lattice points at the centres of the
faces opposite the a and b lattice vectors respectively; it only makes
sense to define these for the cases of orthorhombic and monoclinic lattices, where the choice of C-centre is a matter of convention.
ways. The one lattice that has a 3-fold rotation axis is the rhombohedral lattice as shown here. However, it is possible to populate the hexagonal lattice with a motif with only 3-fold rotation axis so as to generate a trigonal crystal, although the underlying lattice is hexagonal. It is
possible to draw a hexagonal lattice within the rhombohedral lattice
with a unit cell that is three times larger than that of the rhombohedral
unit cell.
159
160
161
162
163
Here we calculate the geometry for four coordination polyhedra consisting of a central cation surrounded by 4, 6, 8 and 12 anions. The cations and anions are treated as spheres with radii r + and r respectively,
and here we calculate the radius ratios r /r + for the cases where the
cationanion bond distance is equal to r + + r and where the distance
between closest anions is equal to 2r , namely the case where anions
are in contact both with the bonded cation and their neighbouring anions. In practice you can imagine that in
4-coordinated cation
In this case, the anions form a perfect tetrahedral arrangement around
the cations, with the angle between two cationanion bonds being
equal to cos1(1/3) = 109.47. By geometry we find that
2r =
8 +
(r + r )
3
1
3/2 1
= 4.449
6 coordinated cation
In this case the anions form a perfect octahedral shape, with the angle
between two cationanion bonds being 90. The geometry shows that
2r =
2 (r + + r )
1
21
= 2.414
8 coordinated cation
In this case, the anions form a perfect square around the cation, with
the angle between two cationanion bonds being equal to
cos(1/3) = 70.53. From geometry we have
2r =
2
3
(r + r )
r
=
r+
1
31
= 1.366
12 coordinated cation
The anions form a perfect icosahedron, with the angle between two
cationanion bonds being 60. Geometry gives
2r + = r + + r
and hence
r
=1
r+
which is only achieved in practice for the case where the anion is the
same as the cation.
165
D. Ionic radii
Radius ()
Cation
Radius ()
Al3+
0.53
Mn4+
0.53
B3+
0.25
Mn5+
0.47
Be2+
0.41
Mn6+
0.395
Cd2+
0.92
Mn7+
0.39
Cu+
0.74
Mo5+
0.60
Cu2+
0.71
Mo6+
0.55
Fe2+
0.77
Na+
1.13
Fe3+
0.63
Ni2+
0.69
Ga3+
0.61
P5+
0.31
Ge4+
0.53
Si4+
0.40
Anion
Radius ()
Anion
Radius ()
In3+
0.76
Sn4+
0.69
Br
1.82
O2
1.25
K+
1.51
Ti4+
0.56
Cl
1.67
S2
1.70
Li+
0.73
W6+
0.56
1.19
Se2
1.84
Mg2+
0.71
Zn2+
0.74
2.06
Mn2+
0.80
Zr4+
0.73
166
Octahedrally-coordinated cations
Cube-coordinated cations
Cation
Radius ()
Cation
Radius ()
Cation
Radius ()
Cation
Radius ()
Ag2+
1.08
Mo5+
0.75
Ba2+
1.56
Na+
1.32
Al3+
0.675
Mo6+
0.73
Bi3+
1.31
Pb2+
1.43
B3+
0.41
Na+
1.16
Ca2+
1.26
Rb+
1.75
Ba2+
1.49
Ni2+
0.83
Cd2+
1.24
Sc3+
1.01
Be2+
0.59
Ni3+
0.70
Cs+
1.88
Sn4+
0.95
Bi3+
1.17
Ni4+
0.62
Fe2+
1.06
Sr2+
1.40
Ca2+
1.14
P5+
0.52
Fe3+
0.92
Ta5+
0.88
Cd2+
1.09
Pb2+
1.33
In3+
1.06
Ti4+
0.88
Cs+
1.81
Rb+
1.66
K+
1.65
Y3+
1.16
Cu+
0.91
Sc3+
0.885
Li+
1.06
Zn2+
1.04
Cu2+
0.87
Si4+
0.54
Mg2+
1.03
Zr4+
0.98
Cu3+
0.68
Sn4+
0.83
Mn2+
1.10
Fe2+
0.75
Sr2+
1.32
Fe3+
0.69
Ta3+
0.86
Ga3+
0.76
Ta4+
0.82
Ge4+
0.67
Ta5+
0.78
In3+
0.94
Ti2+
1.00
K+
1.52
Ti3+
0.81
Li+
0.90
Ti4+
0.745
Mg2+
0.86
W4+
0.80
Mn2+
0.81
W5+
0.76
Mn3+
0.72
W6+
0.74
Mn4+
0.67
Y3+
1.04
Mn7+
0.60
Zn2+
0.88
Mo3+
0.83
Zr4+
0.86
Mo4+
0.79
always be the case that the greatest value of these tables is firstly to calculate expected bond lengths, and secondly to account for differences
in size of two ions. They might be less accurate for tasks such as calculating the radius ratios r /r + that we have talked about in terms of understanding the relative stabilities of different structure types.
167
Ua
Uh
Wout
C
A
Win
X
FIGURE 8.1 Illustration of a vacuum tube used to create beams of
x-radiation. C represents the cathode that emits the electrons,
and A represents a metal target that acts as the anode. The
beams of x-rays emitted from the target are denoted by X.
tory x-ray sources are shown in Figure 6.2. There are two features of
these spectra. The first is a set of sharp peaks in the spectra, which in
168
4p
4s
3d
N
3p
3s
M
2p
2s
L
K
M
M
1s
2
1
L2
L
K wavelength ()
K wavelength ()
Fe
1.935
1.757
Cu
1.541
1.392
Mo
0.709
0.621
Ag
0.559
0.497
fired onto the target. Any accelerating charge, which includes deceleration and deflection, will emit electromagnetic radiation, and in an xray source this effect is seen as the continuous distribution. This is
called Bremsstrahlung radiation (from the German for slowing
down). The cut-off at low wavelength corresponds to the maximum
energy of the electrons as defined by the accelerating voltage of the xray tube. Again, much of the Bremsstrahlung spectrum can be absorbed by filters.
The principles of creating x-rays within the laboratory have not
changed significantly over many years, although there are specialised
sources that have more intense and more focussed beams. The biggest
changes have come in the methods used to detect the scattered beams
of x-rays. Much early work used photographic file, with instruments designed to optimise the way that the photographic sheets were exposed
to the diffracted beams of x-rays. It became possible to measure the
darkening of the photographic film with a high degree of accuracy.
However, film has largely been replaced by electronic detectors, now
based on semiconductors (where the x-ray photon is converted to an
electron-hole pair) and/or scintillation devices (where the x-ray photon
is converted to an optical photon). The Braggs actually used ionisation
detectors, where the x-ray photon ionises a gas and produces a pulse
of electrical current, and such detectors were used for a long time after,
but the modern detectors have the advantage of having much better
spatial resolution and thus can be assembled in an array that covers a
wide area of the scattering space but enables the specific x-ray photon
to be pinpointed to a specific pixel within the array.
Synchrotron radiation
There is an inherent limit to the intensity of x-ray beams produced in
the laboratory, in spite of the development of specialised tubes designed to increase the intensity. This limitation is most keenly felt in
two regards. First, when measurements need to be fast because many
measurements are required, for example on a large suite of samples or
when wanting to perform measurements at many temperatures, and secondly when sample environment (particularly high-pressure apparatus)
absorbs the beam.
Synchrotron radiation is generated by rapid acceleration of beams of
electrons. In a modern facility, beams of electrons are accelerated
around a rings using bending magnets. Through being directed in a circular orbit the electrons continuously emit radiation. However, more
intense and focussed beams of radiation can be produced through devices inserted in the path of the electron that cause sudden changes in
direction of the beam. These sudden changes are much more efficient
at producing intense beams of x-rays.
Specific wavelengths are selected by what is called a monochromator
crystal, in which the by a particular alignment of crystal planes only xrays of a specific wavelength are diffracted.
170
171
It is interesting to note the large number of Nobel Prizes that have been
won for work connected with and around the topic of this book,
namely the physics and chemistry of materials.
The range of work is large. It encompasses discovery of underpinning
phenomena (such as x-rays and the diffraction of x-rays), developments
of experimental measurements techniques and analysis (such as x-ray
diffraction, electron microscope, neutron and light scattering methods,
surface scanning methods, nuclear magnetic resonance), experimental
methods (such as cooling to liquid helium temperatures and high pressures), theory and computation (such as theories of superconductivity,
quantum Hall effect, understanding universal phenomena associated
with phase transitions, and development of simulation methods), discoveries of new effects or materials (such as graphene, hightemperature superconductivity, tunnelling effects in superconductors),
and phenomena associated with technological developments (such as
the transistor and the large magnetoresistence).
Here we list, with photographs, all Nobel laureates in the disciplines of
Physics and Chemistry whose work can more-or-less be said to be in
the area of materials physics and chemistry.