Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISSN 0733-4273
CASE STUDIES
Case Material
Gina was a 27-year-old single Christian woman
who had been referred for psychotherapy by the
church where she had been helping in college
ministry. Her referral was precipitated by the discovery that she had engaged in homosexual
behavior with another woman whom she had met
during a community-wide church event. Though
historically depressed and emotionally over controlled, this impulsive act so startled Gina that she
readily consented to treatment. Over the course
of several months in therapy, it became evident
overtures, Gina's female friends were "so religiously hung up about sex" that they refused to
respond in kind. My treatment did not involve
directly challenging Alex's views about same-sex
behavior; indeed, Alex did not even view his
activity as being homosexual in nature and such
an approach would have likely destroyed our
alliance. Gina's sexual behavior in general was
not a specific focus of her therapy. Instead, my
treatment involved interventions common to
DID. As regards Alex, his fundamental, trauma
driven cognitive distortions needed to be challenged, including his belief in having a separate
body from Gina's and his need to be oriented to
the present where further trauma was no longer
an immanent threat. Alex began to question his
own dissociative understanding of himself and
the outside world. The facilitation of communication among Gina's alternate identities further
eroded the dissociative barriers and provided a
greater context for Alex to empathically understand the nature of the trauma they had experienced, eventually leading to significant grief
work that included Alex's deeply hidden feelings
of failure for being unable to prevent some of
Gina's abuse. A growing sense of Christian-oriented spirituality within Gina's system of alternate
identities also gave momentum to the therapeutic
process, and this was instrumental to relieving
Alex's feelings of failure and guilt.
In the end, as Gina listened to her dissociated
identities and gained a more coherent sense of
self, Alex willingly integrated with Gina's
increasingly united consciousness. Interestingly,
Gina reported that her experience of same-sex
attractions and conflicts were greatly reduced,
though she sometimes noticed them temporarily
during particularly stressful circumstances in her
life. This could be interpreted as a brief reactivation of her formerly dissociated Alex ego state,
but not to the point of a renewed dissociative
split. As is typical for DID treatment, integration
of the dissociated personality states marked the
beginning of Gina learning to live without dissociative coping mechanisms and having to develop more adaptive coping skills. The treatment
needs related to Alex would not be complete
without assisting Gina post-integration to develop greater skill and comfort in her social relations (particularly with men), a task which took
significant time to accomplish despite her great
desire to achieve a level of heterosexual functioning that was satisfying to her.
CASE STUDIES
1
patients to shift from the role of victim to that of a
perpetrator and in so doing gain a psychological
sense of control and mastery over their potentially
self-destroying traumatic circumstances. Homosexually oriented female alternate identities in female
patients may also sexually victimize women, but in
this case the assumption of the perpetrator role
may also, serve to enable the patient to avoid the
intense fear of sexual contact with men.
insights for psychotherapeutic treatment, particularly where unwanted same-sex attractions and
behavior have been reported in traumatized
patients who evidence a significant degree of dissociation. Some of these are described below in
no particular order of importance.
Sexual behavior as a secondary issue
Dissociative and traumatized patients may be
very focused on the unacceptability of their
same-sex behavior and attractions, especially if
they come from conservatively religious backgrounds. While it may be tempting for therapists who are Christian to place an initial focus
primarily on the patient's sexual behavior, this
would be a mistake. The psychodynamics of
opposite-gender identities illuminates the reality
that in these cases same-sex sexual behavior is
often formed as a psychological adaptation to
cope with trauma. Therefore, while the therapist sometimes will need to assist the patient in
establishing boundaries on sexual behavior, the
goal of effective treatment cannot simply be
behavioral management, unless the underlying,
trauma-driven dissociative distortions in cognitions and self-perception are addressed, the psychological coping mechanisms that may give
rise to the unwanted same-sex behavior and
attractions are likely to continue to perpetuate
them. The goal is to dissolve the dissociative
barriers between identities through the processing of traumatic material and correction of related cognitive distortions. Ross (1989) observed
that opposite-gender identities can be integrated
with no disturbing effect on the patient's primary gender identity.
Trust is a must
It is impossible to stress how important the
establishment of safety and trust is in the treatment of DID related unwanted same-sex attractions and behavior. This insight is related to the
previous one in that religious moralizing by the
therapist regarding same-sex behavior will only
serve to hinder the patient's ability to address it
by reinforcing the defensive functions of the
opposite-gender and other identities. The conservative Christian patient, in particular, is quite likely to have already internalized condemnatory
messages regarding same-sex behavior, so that an
early treatment goal is to facilitate the development of a strong alliance by providing a safe,
nonjudgmental environment. Same-sex behaviors
and attractions can be therapeutically examined
more from a position of functional curiosity than
alternate identities. It is evident from this analysis that there is a dearth of literature addressing
this topic and that what literature there is has
evolved in ways that mirror the cultural shifts
regarding the psychological status of homosexuality. That is, the earlier analyses seem more
open to the application of a dissociative trauma
model in understanding the origins of some
same-sex behavior and attractions. By contrast,
more recent discussions appear to discount their
potential etiological significance. Without arriving at any peremptory determination on this subject, I want to close by making two observations
that I believe will ensure a scientifically responsible treatment of the topic.
First, responsible theorizing about the role of
opposite-gender identities in same-sex behavior
and attraction has to acknowledge that such
extreme dissociative dynamics are likely to be
involved in only a relatively small percentage of
individuals with such experiences. Case examples such as that of Gina have a primarily heuristic value for the development of hypotheses and
cannot be assumed applicable to other cases in
the absence of further scientific evidence.
Insights gleaned from DID sufferers may well
have a broader relevance to non-DID patients
who report childhood trauma and same-sex
behavior, but even then one has to. be careful not
to over generalize their relevance in understanding the origins of behavior associated with
minority sexual orientation. I am familiar with
cases of DID where the post-integration sexual
orientation identified as homosexual, so it should
not be assumed that the healing of trauma necessarily results in a heterosexual adjustment.
That being said, however, the other danger to
avoid is to deny altogether the psychodynamic
implications of opposite-gender identities in
comprehending trauma-driven contributions to
the genesis of some cases of same-sex behavior
and attractions. The more recent writing on this
subject appears to discount such possibilities as
a perquisite for being scientifically credible
(Howell, 2002; Rivera, 2002). From my perspective, however, a scientifically honest curiosity
into this phenomenon that is not constrained by
sociopolitical considerations would be eager to
undertake research and theorizing about it. Yet
a fairly pervasive silence on this intriguing topic
currently exists within the dissociative disorders
and human sexuality fields. Perhaps this is
occurring out of an understandable desire to not
add to the stigmatization of sexual minorities by
Ross, C. A. (2002). Sexual orientation conflict in the dissociative disorders. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation,
3(4), 137-146.
Rosik, C. H. (2003). Critical issues in the dissociative disorders field: Six perspectives from religiously sensitive
practitioners. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 31,
113-128.
Walling, D. R, Goodwin, J. M., & Cole, C. M. (1998).
Dissociation in a transsexual population. Journal of
Sex Education & Therapy, 23(2), 121-123.
Watkins, J. G., & Watkins, H. H. (1982). Ego-state therapy. In L. E. Abt & I. R. Stuart (Eds.), The newer therapies: A source book (pp. 137-155). New York, NY; Van
Nostrand Reinhold.
World Professional Association for Transgender Health
(2011). Standards of Care for the Health of Transsexual, Transgender, and Gender Nonconforming People
(7th Edition). Retrieved from http://www.wpath.org/
Author
Christopher H. Rosik, Ph.D., is a psychologist and
Director of Research at the Link Care Center in Fresno,
California. He is also a member of the clinical faculty at
Fresno Pacific University. His areas of interest include
missionary and pastoral care, dissociative disorders,
human sexuality, and the philosophy of social science.
Copyright of Journal of Psychology & Christianity is the property of Christian Association for Psychological
Studies and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the
copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for
individual use.