TAM-BYTES

September 21, 2015

Vol. 18, No. 38
TAM Webinars
Ethical Issues in Dealing with Medical Records: HIPAA Requirements
and Confidentiality Concerns, 60-minute webinar presented by Marty
Phillips, with Rainey, Kizer, Reviere & Bell in Jackson, on Tuesday,
October 20, at 10 a.m. (Central), 11a.m. (Eastern).
*Earn 1 hour of DUAL credit
10 Rules to Use in Tennessee Civil Lawsuits, 60-minute webinar
presented by Brandon Bass, with The Law Offices of John Day in
Brentwood, on Wednesday, October 28, at 2 p.m. (Central), 3 p.m. (Eastern).
*Earn 1 hour of GENERAL credit
Estate Administration in Tennessee: Identifying Assets and Satisfying
Creditor Claims, 60-minute webinar presented by Grayson Smith
Cannon, with Phillips & Ingrum in Gallatin, on Wednesday, November 18, at
2 p.m. (Central), 3 p.m. (Eastern).
*Earn 1 hour of GENERAL credit
For more information or to register, call (800) 727-5257 or visit www.mleesmith.com

TAM On-Site Events

Probate & Estate Planning Conference for Tennessee

Attorneys
WHEN: Thursday & Friday, October 22 & 23
WHERE: Nashville Nashville School of Law
CLE: Earn all your CLE for 2015 up to 15 hours of GENERAL credit
and 3 hours of DUAL credit!!
FACULTY: Rebecca Blair, The Blair Law Firm, Brentwood; Julie A.
Boswell, Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC, Nashville;
Jennifer Surber, Surber, Asher, Surber & Moushon, PLLC, Nashville;

Harlan Dodson, Dodson, Parker, Behm & Capparella P.C., Nashville;

Donald J. Farinato, Hodges, Doughty & Carson, PLLC, Knoxville; David
Heller, Martin Heller Potempa & Sheppard, Nashville; Steve McDaniel,
Wyatt Tarrant & Combs LLP, Memphis; John McDonald, Evans, Jones &
Reynolds, PC, Nashville; Hunter R. Mobley, Howard Mobley Hayes &
Gontarek, PLLC, Nashville; Jeff Mobley, Howard Mobley Hayes &
Gontarek, PLLC, Nashville; Joel D. Roettger, Gentry, Tipton & McLemore,
P.C., Knoxville; Stacy Roettger, The Trust Company of Knoxville,
Knoxville; Brian S. Shelton, Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP,
Nashville; Alexander M. Taylor, Kennerly Montgomery & Finley, P.C.,
Knoxville; and Matthew Thornton, Bourland, Heflin, Alvarez, Minor &
Matthews, PLC, Memphis
HIGHLIGHTS: Advanced estate planning tips; checklists with trust drafting
tips; estate planning with trusts; will drafting tips - planning opportunities and
challenges for 2015 and beyond; planning for digital assets; revocable trusts
versus traditional will; planning for a gradual transfer of land within the family;
features of properly designed grantor trust for Medicaid and veterans planning;
minimizing fees and costs by utilizing alternatives to probate; how to use
retirement assets in estate planning; strategies for resolving TennCare claims;
trusts, estate planning, and probate update; tips for practicing in probate court;
ethical issues arising in estate planning and estate administration, such as client
confidentiality, billing inquiries, and other difficult-to-resolve dilemmas; and
sample forms and checklists.
To learn more or to register, visit: http://www.mleesmith.com/probate.

Tennessee Real Estate Law Conference

WHEN: Friday, October 30
WHERE: Nashville Nashville School of Law
CLE: Earn up to 7.5 hours of CLE, including 6.5 hours of GENERAL and
1 hour of DUAL credit
FACULTY: Kim Brown, Sherrard & Roe; Christopher S. Dunn, Waller,
Lansden, Dortch & Davis; Robert C. Goodrich Jr., Burr & Forman; Lisa
Helton, Sherrard & Roe; Zachary Miller, Burr & Forman; C. Palmer
Pillans, Butler Snow; Marcy Shelton, Gullett Sanford Robinson & Martin;
Wes Turner, Gullett Sanford Robinson & Martin; and Dudley M. West,
White & Reasor, PLC.

HIGHLIGHTS: Drafting commercial leases; commercial development and

financing; mechanics and materialmens liens; commercial foreclosure
issues; hot topics in title insurance; consumer mortgages and the impact of
the new CFPB rules; ethical considerations in real estate law; and real estate
case law/legislative update
To learn more or to register, visit: www.mleesmith.com/tn-real-estate-2015.

Law Conference for Tennessee Practitioners

WHEN: Thursday & Friday, November 12 & 13
WHERE: Nashville -- Marriott Franklin/Cool Springs
CLE: Earn all your CLE for 2015 up to 15 hours of GENERAL credit
and 3 hours of DUAL credit!!
FACULTY: Judge Frank Clement, Court of Appeals, Middle Section;
Judge Joseph P. Binkley, Circuit Court, Davidson County; Chancellor
Ellen Hobbs Lyle, Chancery Court, Davidson County; Chancellor Russell
T. Perkins, Chancery Court, Davidson County; David Anthony, Bone
McAllester & Norton PLLC; Laura Baker, Law Offices of John Day P.C.;
Dale Conder, Rainey Kizer Reviere & Bell PLC; Dan Coughlin,
Massengill, Caldwell & Coughlin PC; Griffin Dunham, Emerge Law PLC;
Sandy Garrett, Chief Disciplinary Counsel, Board of Professional
Responsibility; Candi Henry, Dodson Parker Behm & Capparella PC;
Randy L. Kinnard, Kinnard, Clayton & Beveridge; Brenton H. Lankford,
Stites & Harbison PLLC; Matt Potempa, Martin Heller Potempa &
Sheppard; and Richard Spore, Bass, Berry & Sims PLC
HIGHLIGHTS: Overview of Tennessees new business court; recent
developments in healthcare liability; use of judgment liens on real and personal
property; family law highlights; tips on handling uninsured/underinsured
motorist claims; sophisticated deposition strategies; rules that practitioners
seldom encounter; representing a client in a business divorce; using websites and
social media to promote your law practice; probating wills and administering
estates; pretrial motion practice; the deferential abuse of discretion standard of
review; update from the Board of Professional Responsibility; ethics and
evidence; and professionalism in the practice of law.
To learn more or to register, visit: http://www.mleesmith.com/law-conference-2015.

Tennessee Workers Comp Conference

WHEN: Thursday & Friday, November 19 & 20
WHERE: Nashville Embassy Suites Franklin/Cool Springs
CLE: Earn up to 14 hours of GENERAL credit and 1 hour of DUAL credit!!
FACULTY: WORKERS COMP JUDGES: Judge Tim Conner; Judge
Marshall Davidson; Judge Pam Johnson; and Chief Judge Ken Switzer.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT: Troy
Haley; Dr. Robert B. Snyder; April Verdoni; and Lance Wheaton.
WORKERS COMP ATTORNEYS: Mary Dee Allen; Fred Baker; Leslie
Bishop; Kitty Boyte; Greg Grisham; Sean Antone Hunt; Steve Libby;
Mary Beth Maddox; Marshall McClarnon; Kenneth D. Veit; and Elaine
M. Youngblood. OTHERS: Wendy Fisher; Dr. Jeffrey Hazlewood; and
Christine Chris McEvoy.
HIGHLIGHTS: Insight from judges on the Court of Workers
Compensation Claims and the Workers Compensation Appeals Board;
comparison of cases and factual scenarios under the old and new law; review
of medical panels under the new law, hot topics in workers comp today, and
the interplay between workers comp, the ADA, and the FMLA; insight
from Department of Labor and Workforce Development representatives on
the drug-free workplace program, the new pain management rules, penaltyworthy offenses, and the ombudsman program; and a doctors perspective
on deterring abuse of pain medication in workers comp claims. Attorney
track also features a session on dos and donts when trying a case in the
Court of Workers Compensation Claims, how the new rules really work in
practice, settlement options including MSAs, hot topics in workers comp
from both the plaintiffs and defense perspectives, ethical issues arising
under the new law, and a panel discussion each day featuring defense and
plaintiffs attorneys, as well as a review of the latest cases from the
Tennessee Supreme Court, Workers Compensation Appeals Panels,
Workers Compensation Appeals Board, and Court of Workers
Compensation Claims.
To learn more or to register, visit: http://www.mleesmith.com/workers-comp-2015.

Family Law Conference for Tennessee Practitioners

WHEN: Thursday & Friday, December 3 & 4
WHERE: Nashville Nashville School of Law

CLE: Earn all your CLE for 2015 up to 15 hours of GENERAL credit
and 3 hours of DUAL credit!!
FACULTY: Judge Robert L. Childers, circuit court, Shelby County;
Judge Phillip Robinson, circuit court, Davidson County; Judge Joseph
Woodruff, circuit court, 21st Judicial District (Hickman, Lewis, Perry, and
Williamson counties); and Judge Thomas Wright, circuit court, 3rd Judicial
Circuit (Greene, Hamblen, Hancock, and Hawkins counties); along with
attorneys Amy J. Amundsen, Rice, Amundsen & Caperton PLLC,
Memphis; John J. Hollins, Jr., Hollins, Raybin & Weissman PC, Nashville;
Cathy Speers Johnson, Thompson Burton PLLC, Nashville; Stanley A.
Kweller, Jackson, Kweller, McKinney, Hayes, Lewis & Garrett, Nashville;
Marlene Moses, MTR Family Law, PLLC, Nashville; Linley Richter, Jr.,
Richter & Rasberry, P.C., Memphis; Kevin Shepherd, Maryville attorney;
Greg Smith, Stites & Harbison PLLC, Nashville; Jason Talley, Cheatham,
Palermo & Garrett Law; and Jacob Thorington, Cheatham, Palermo &
Garrett Law, Nashville
HIGHLIGHTS: Protecting a clients separate assets; valuing and dividing
marital property; access to mental health records in a custody case; special
issues in military divorce; practical tips from judges on issues such as attorney
fees, contempt, and child custody modification; marketing yourself and your
law firm; social media tips and tricks; domestic violence cases and mediation;
cohabiting couples and same-sex marriages; attorney fees in family matters and
contempt; case law/legislative update; and ethical considerations in family law.
To learn more or to register, visit: http://www.mleesmith.com/family-law-15.

Attorney Technology Conference

WHEN: Friday, December 11
WHERE: Nashville Nashville School of Law
CLE: Earn up to 7.5 hours of CLE, including 6.5 hours of GENERAL and
1 hour of DUAL credit
FACULTY: Judge Thomas Brothers, Davidson County Circuit Court;
David Anthony, Bone McAllester Norton PLLC, Nashville; Andre J.
Bahou, Bahou Law PLC, Brentwood; Ian Bourgoine, Belmont University
College of Law, Nashville; Nancy Eady, Morris, Haynes, Wheeles, Knowles,
& Nelson, Alexander City, AL; William M. Jeter, Heaton and Moore PC,
Memphis; Tom Shaw, Assistant General Counsel, CCA Legal Department;
and Russell Taber, Riley Warnock & Jacobson PLC, Nashville

HIGHLIGHTS: Practical tech tips: Recovering data, archiving and

preserving data, and sharing and retrieving data; time-saving tools that
every attorney should have in his or her technology toolkit; how to make
your social media evidence usable at trial; a judges perspective on
technology in the courtroom and e-discovery; how to find free legal
research sites and free case law; tips and strategies for collecting social
media evidence to use at trial; how to find practice tools, such as sample
forms, contracts, briefs, and settlements; update on new federal e-discovery
rules; how to use blogs and social media to grow your practice; and ethical
issues inherent in cloud computing
To learn more or to register, visit: www.mleesmith.com/tech-2015

IN THIS WEEKS TAM-Bytes

Supreme Court rules trial court erred in determining that written
notice of claim that plaintiff filed with Division of Claims
Administration, filed within one-year limitations period, was
sufficient to trigger 90-day window provided in TCA 20-1-119 to
name non-party defendant as comparative tort-feasor;
Court of Appeals, in defamation case, declines to extend fair report
privilege to apply to informal reports and official and unofficial
investigations, contacts, and communications;
Court of Appeals says TCA 62-5-703 grants decedents surviving
spouse right to control inscription on decedents headstone as part of
right of disposition;
SUPREME COURT
CIVIL PROCEDURE: When tree planted on property owned by state fell
on plaintiff's car on 12/24/09 while he was crossing bridge in Clarksville,
plaintiff filed written notice of claim against state on 12/17/10, Division of
Claims Administration failed to honor or deny claim within 90 days and
claim was transferred on 3/17/11 to administrative clerk of Claims
Commission, plaintiff filed formal complaint with Claims Commission on
4/14/11, state filed amended answer on 9/18/12 alleging that City of
Clarksville was comparatively at fault, Claims Commission allowed
amendment on 10/5/12, and plaintiff filed suit against city on 11/26/12, trial
court erred in determining that written notice of claim that plaintiff filed
with Division of Claims, filed within one-year limitations period, was
sufficient to trigger 90-day window provided in TCA 20-1-119; complaint,
not written notice of claim, is "original complaint" under TCA 20-1-119, so

90-day window to name non-party defendant as comparative tort-feasor was

never triggered; TCA 9-8-402(b), tolling provision in Claims Commission
Act, is not applicable to toll statute of limitation for claim against
municipality filed under Governmental Tort Liability Act. Moreno v. City
of Clarksville, 9/18/15, Nashville, Kirby, dissent by Wade, 29 pages.
http://www.tncourts.gov/sites/default/files/morenorichard.opn_.pdf
http://www.tncourts.gov/sites/default/files/morenorichardopn_dissent_final.pdf

WORKERS COMP APPEALS PANEL

WORKERS COMPENSATION: Evidence did not preponderate against
trial courts finding that bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome of employee, truck
driver, was caused or aggravated by his employment when trial court found
that employee did have carpal tunnel syndrome to some extent prior to
becoming an employee of [employer] and that his work with [employer]
advanced or aggravated his CTS to the point where it became much more
symptomatic and caused him to seek medical treatment; trial court properly
reversed its original award of temporary total disability from 9/10/07 until
7/6/11 when employee could have worked (with restricted duties) during
period from 9/07 until maximum medical improvement in 7/11, it appears
that employees inability to work was based on other medical issues, not
carpal tunnel syndrome, and thus, employee failed to prove causal
connection between work injury and his ability to work. DeMorato v.
Cherokee Insurance Co., 9/10/15, Memphis, Brasfield, 9 pages.
http://www.tncourts.gov/sites/default/files/demoratoopn.pdf

WORKERS COMPENSATION: Trial court did not err in according

presumption of correctness to anatomical impairment rating of MIR
physician in case in which plaintiff contends that AMA Guides Sixth
Edition, upon which MIR physician based his rating, is medically incorrect
as applied to employees injury; while under certain circumstances, failure
to properly follow AMA Guides may be excused, there is no authority for
proposition that following AMA Guides as statutorily directed somehow
renders physicians determination based thereon invalid. Alexander v. A&A
Express LLC, 9/10/15, Memphis, Brasfield, 16 pages.
http://www.tncourts.gov/sites/default/files/alexanderopn.pdf

WORKERS COMPENSATION: When defendant terminated plaintiff on

8/22/12, but parties contractually agreed that she would continue working
for defendant through 9/28/12, plaintiff injured her back on 8/27/12 while
working for defendant, she continued working for defendant following her
injury and through 9/28/12, at which time her employment ended, plaintiff
did not return to work for defendant following end of her employment with

defendant and her release from treatment on 3/20/13, and plaintiff filed
workers compensation complaint on 8/13/13, trial court erred in ruling that
plaintiff had meaningful return to work and applying 1.5 times cap; even
layoff of employee for purely economic reasons following employees postinjury return to work may be deemed termination of employment
relationship which results in absence of meaningful return to work and
inapplicability of 1.5 times cap; temporary nature of plaintiffs employment
with defendant following her termination and contractual extension is not
relevant to application of meaningful return to work concept; trial court
appears to have based its finding that plaintiff had meaningful return to
work upon plaintiffs return to work immediately after accident and her
continuing to work until expiration of her contract, but, at that point in time,
plaintiff had not reached maximum medical impairment and had not
received any restrictions, and hence, it was premature for trial court to make
its meaningful return to work determination based on that point in time.
Swaner v. G4S Youth Services LLC, 9/14/15, Nashville, Cantrell, 12 pages.
http://www.tncourts.gov/sites/default/files/g4s-swaneropnjo.pdf

COURT OF APPEALS
TORTS: In defamation and false light invasion of privacy action based on
allegedly defamatory newspaper article published by defendant newspaper,
reporter, editor, and publisher detailing plaintiffs involvement in recentlyapproved investment by Memphis City Council to fund revitalization of
Southbrook Mall located in Whitehaven neighborhood of Memphis, trial
court erred in concluding that fair report privilege applied when
councilmans statement could reasonably be read as involving unofficial,
off-the record statement that lack[s] the dignity and authoritative weight
of official actions and proceedings; article did not form assertion under
which plaintiffs claim of defamation can be sustained for purpose of
motion to dismiss when article raised question about plaintiffs involvement
in Southbrook Mall project and whether he was being honest with city
officials, but question raised did not constitute assertion by defendant that
plaintiff was either hiding his involvement or deceiving city officials;
statements were capable of being defamatory sufficient to avoid dismissal
of plaintiffs claim of defamation by implication when plain and natural
import of articles language and implications suggest that plaintiff had not
been forthright with city leaders regarding his control or financial interest
over project, and nature of these allegations may hold plaintiff up to ridicule
and disparage any reputation he had as fair and forthright businessman.
Grant v. Commercial Appeal, 9/18/15, ES, Stafford, 22 pages.
http://www.tncourts.gov/sites/default/files/grantgopn.pdf

INSURANCE: When plaintiffs acquired homeowners insurance policy in

1995 that did not expressly include or exclude sinkhole coverage, policy
was renewed every year through 2011, prior to effective date of TCA 56-7130, insurers doing business in Tennessee were not required to make
available coverage for insurable sinkhole losses on dwellings they insured,
for policies issued or renewed on or after January 7, 2007, statute stated
that every insurer offering homeowner property insurance in Tennessee
shall make available coverage for insurable sinkhole losses on any dwelling,
including contents of personal property contained in the dwelling, to the
extent provided in the policy to which the sinkhole coverage attaches, in
3/11, plaintiffs house was damaged by what they allege was sinkhole, and
plaintiffs filed suit against insurer in 7/12 asserting claims for breach of
contract, violations of Tennessee Consumer Protection Act, and bad faith
under TCA 56-7-105, TCA 56-7-130 did not require insurers to notify
policyholders that they could purchase sinkhole coverage; when policy
covered accidental direct physical loss to property covered under Dwelling
and Other Structures Coverages except for losses excluded in this section,
facts material to determining cause of damages to plaintiffs home were
disputed, and insurer is not entitled to summary judgment. Patterson v.
Shelter Mutual Insurance Co., 9/11/15, MS, Clement, 12 pages.
http://www.tncourts.gov/sites/default/files/patterson.keith_.opn_.pdf

ESTATES & TRUSTS: When decedent was married twice and had four
children with first wife and three with second, Doyle, son of second
marriage, sought to have admitted to probate will providing bequests of
$1,000 to other children, stating that decedent had considered children of
deceased child and omitted them from share of estate, and rest, residue, and
remainder of decedents estate was bequeathed to Doyle, and three children
filed complaint to contest will, evidence did not preponderate against trial
courts finding that confidential relationship existed between Doyle and
decedent when decedent placed confidence in Doyle with regard to
activities of daily living and financial affairs, among other things, and that
because of that confidence Doyle had ability to influence and exercise
dominion and control over decedent; evidence did not preponderate against
trial courts finding that Doyle had failed to rebut presumption of undue
influence by clear and convincing evidence when decedent was 90 years old
when he executed will, had previously suffered stroke, and had diabetes,
decedent had between third and sixth grade education, and two other
children from decedents second marriage, testified that they offered to do
more to assist decedent and that they were told by Doyle that they could not
and that he had things under control, and that they were unaware of

existence of will and its terms until after decedents death. In re Estate of
Dukes, 9/11/15, ES, Swiney, 23 pages.
http://www.tncourts.gov/sites/default/files/inreestateofdoyleidukesopn.pdf

ESTATES & TRUSTS: TCA 62-5-703 grants decedents surviving

spouse right to control inscription on decedents headstone as part of right
of disposition, i.e., right to determine disposition of remains of decedent,
including location, manner, and conditions of disposition and arrangements
for funeral goods and services; inscription of certain name on decedents
headstone is not attempt to change persons name, or correct error on
persons birth certificate, and name change statute is not implicated when
name other than decedents legal name, i.e., nickname or moniker, is used
on headstone. In re Estate of Love, 9/18/15, WS, Armstrong, 7 pages.
http://www.tncourts.gov/sites/default/files/inreestateoflovet.pdf

PROPERTY: When deed granting easement refers to already existing

right-of-way, dimensions and location of easement may be construed to
conform to right-of-way already in existence at creation of easement; in
case of dispute over private airstrip easement, because of indefinite nature
of location of airstrip easement, trial court correctly considered extrinsic
evidence in making its ruling notwithstanding dimensions of airstrip
referred to in deed and agreement; burdens of express easement appurtenant
pass regardless of whether purchaser has notice, and false assertions of
abandonment by common grantor are insufficient to terminate rights of
dominant estate. Holder v. Serodino, 9/16/15, MS, McBrayer, 21 pages.
http://www.tncourts.gov/sites/default/files/holderc.opn1_.pdf

GOVERNMENT: In case in which Bivens, incumbent candidate for

office of Sheriff of Monroe County, challenged election for sheriff based
upon ineligibility of other candidate (White), trial court properly voided
election when White lacked statutorily prescribed qualifications to hold
sheriffs office because he did not possess three years of full-time
experience as POST Commission certified law enforcement officer; trial
court properly found no ambiguity or conflict between statutory
qualifications required by TCA 8-8-102 and definition of requisite three
years of full-time experience in TCA 38-8-101(2). Bivens v. White,
9/16/15, ES, McClarty, 16 pages.
http://www.tncourts.gov/sites/default/files/bivensopn.pdf

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: In case in which wife obtained order of
protection against estranged husband which specified that husband must

not come about wife (including coming by or to shared residence) for any
purpose and must not contact wife, either directly or indirectly, by phone,
email, messages, text messages, mail or any other type of communication or
contact, order of protection was not ambiguous order clearly instructed
defendant to refrain from coming about wife and coming by their
previously shared residence, and ordinary person would understand orders
prohibitions; defendant did not violate protective order when he came
about wife in shopping plaza or came about wifes residence while
traveling to cookout, but husband knowingly violated order of protection
when he stopped his vehicle on road and tried to take picture of wife and
her male friend. State v. Daniel, 9/16/15, Nashville, Witt, 9 pages.
http://www.tncourts.gov/sites/default/files/danieldonadedwardopn.pdf

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: In case in which defendant was convicted of

six counts of aggravated sexual battery in connection with offense
committed against defendants 6-year-old stepdaughter, trial judge did not
abuse discretion in allowing state to use leading questions during victims
direct examination in light of victims age and circumstances of case and
fact that leading questions did not unduly prejudice defendant because after
questions, victim agreed that such encounters occurred and then added
further details about incidents from her own memory. State v. Diaz,
9/18/15, Nashville, Page, 20 pages.
http://www.tncourts.gov/sites/default/files/diazluisjorgeopn.pdf

COURT OF WORKERS COMP CLAIMS

WORKERS COMPENSATION: Employee carried his burden of
establishing that he suffered injury primarily arising out of and in course
and scope of employment when employee testified that, while loading
materials onto truck, he noticed that materials being lowered from top of
tower were falling, that while reaching to grab rope from pulley in attempt
to secure them, plaintiff lost his balance, and that, as he fell to ground, he
heard his knee pop; plaintiff is entitled to past temporary partial disability
benefits when employee injured his knee on 11/3/14, employer fired him
for tardiness and refusal to complete job duties on 11/5/14, employee gave
timely written notice of injury on 11/7/14, and medical providers diagnosed
employee with knee derangement and issued discharge instructions that
prohibited him from bearing weight on his knee. Asberry v. Site
Communications, 6/5/15, Baker, 12 pages
http://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1104&context=utk_workerscomp

WORKERS COMPENSATION: For period beginning 3/10/15, doctors

records indicate that he released employee to return to limited duty with no

lifting over 10 pounds maximum and no occasional stooping, bending, or

twisting, employee testified that she started working as security officer on
3/21/14, and hence, employee is entitled to temporary partial disability
benefits of $241 per week from 3/10/15 through 3/20/15; employee is
entitled to temporary partial disability benefits at $46 per week beginning
3/21/15 through date of this order; employee is entitled to ongoing
temporary partial disability benefits until she is released to return to fullduty work by authorized treating physician or placed at maximum medical
improvement. King v. Als Foodland, 6/5/15, Johnson, 16 pages.
http://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1114&context=utk_workerscomp

If you would like a copy of the full text of any of these opinions, simply
click on the link provided or, if no link is provided, you may respond to
this e-mail or call us at (615) 661-0248 in order to request a copy. You
may also view and download the full text of any state appellate court
decision by accessing the states web site by clicking here:
http://www.tncourts.gov