Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Micron
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/micron
Review
University of Vienna, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmaceutics, Faculty of Life Sciences, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria
Graz University of Technology and Centre for Electron Microscopy Graz, Institute for Electron Microscopy and Fine Structure Research (FELMI-ZFE), Steyrergasse 17, 8010 Graz,
Austria
b
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 30 May 2011
Received in revised form 18 July 2011
Accepted 19 July 2011
Keywords:
Nanoemulsion
Submicron emulsion
Electron microscopy
Scanning electron microscopy
Transmission electron microscopy
Cryo ATEM
a b s t r a c t
The characterisation of pharmaceutical formulations by microscopic techniques is essential to obtain
reliable data about the actual morphology of the system. Since the size range of colloidal drug delivery systems has long ago reached the lower end of the nanometer scale, classical light microscopy has
been replaced by electron microscopy techniques which provide sufcient resolution for the visualisation of nano-sized structures. Indeed, the superior resolution and methodological versatility of electron
microscopy has rendered this technique an indispensable tool for the analysis of nanoemulsions. Microscopic analysis of these lipid-based drug delivery systems with particle sizes in the lower submicron
range provides critical information about the size, shape and internal structure of the emulsion droplets.
Moreover, surfactant aggregates such as liposomes or multilamellar structures which remain unnoticed
during particle size measurements can be detected in this fashion. This review provides a brief overview
about both transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) techniques
which have been employed to characterise nanoemulsions. Of special interest are sophisticated cryo techniques of sample preparation for both TEM and SEM which deliver high-quality images of nanoemulsions
in their natural state. An overview about the instrumentation and sample preparation for all presented
methods is given. Important practical aspects, sources of error and common artefacts as well as recent
methodological advances are discussed. Selected examples of electron microscopic studies of nanoemulsions are presented to illustrate the potential of this technique to reveal detailed and specic information.
2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Contents
1.
2.
3.
4.
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nano-sized emulsion systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.1.
Properties and characterisation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2.
Laser light scattering versus electron microscopy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.3.
Development of microscopic techniques for visualisation of nanoemulsions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Scanning electron microscopy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.1.
Experimental setup, sample preparation and potential artefacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2.
SEM-based techniques for characterisation of nanoemulsions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Transmission electron microscopy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.1.
Experimental setup, sample preparation and potential artefacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
86
86
86
87
88
89
89
89
89
89
Abbreviations: TEM, transmission electron microscopy; SEM, scanning electron microscopy; EELS, electron energy-loss spectroscopy; EDX, energy dispersive X-ray
spectroscopy; DLS, dynamic light scattering; PDI, polydispersity index; AFM, atomic force microscopy; ESEM, environmental scanning electron microscopy; STEM, scanning
transmission electron microscopy; FF-TEM, freeze-fracture transmission electron microscopy; EFTEM, energy-ltered transmission electron microscopy; MDM, minimum
detectable mass; MMF, minimum detectable mass fraction; ELNES, energy-loss near edge structure.
Corresponding author. Tel.: +43 316 873 8335; fax: +43 316 811 596.
Corresponding author. Tel.: +43 4277 55404; fax: +43 4277 9554.
E-mail addresses: victoria.klang@univie.ac.at (V. Klang), nadejda.matsko@felmizfe.at (N.B. Matsko).
1
These authors contributed equally to this work.
0968-4328/$ see front matter 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.micron.2011.07.014
86
5.
6.
7.
8.
4.2.
Conventional TEM for characterisation of nanoemulsions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
Cryo-preparation techniques for SEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
5.1.
FF-SEM and cryo SEM: experimental setup, sample preparation and potential artefacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
5.2.
FF-SEM and cryo SEM for characterisation of nanoemulsions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
Cryo-preparation techniques for TEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
6.1.
Freeze-etching and freeze-fracturing for TEM: experimental setup, sample preparation and potential artefacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
6.2.
Freeze-fracture TEM for characterisation of nanoemulsions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
6.3.
Cryo TEM: experimental setup, sample preparation and potential artefacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
6.4.
Cryo TEM for characterisation of nanoemulsions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
Advanced techniques: cryo analytical TEM (cryo ATEM) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
1. Introduction
87
Fig. 1. (A) Visual appearance and cryo TEM image of a nanoemulsion. Images reprinted from Sonneville-Aubrun et al. (2004) with permission from Elsevier. (B) Cryo TEM
image of a nanoemulsion with nano-sized oil droplets (homogeneously lled circles) and vesicles (unlled circles). The black scale bar represents 200 nm. Image reprinted
from Norden et al. (2001) with permission from Elsevier. (C) TEM micrograph of an amphotericin B nanoemulsion with particle sizes between 100 and 400 nm, prepared
by the freeze-fracturing technique. Image reprinted from Benita and Levy (1993) with permission from Wiley. (D) Visualisation of the size distribution and morphology of
nanoemulsions by atomic force microscopy, reprinted from Marxer et al. (2011) with permission from Elsevier.
particle size distribution and thus the homogeneity of the formulation. A small PDI below 0.2 indicates a narrow droplet size
distribution and thus better stability against destabilisation phenomena such as Ostwald ripening (Klang and Valenta, 2011c).
The characterisation and stability assessment of nanoemulsions is
strongly associated with their droplet size and PDI. If both parameters remain largely unchanged during a prolonged observation
period, a formulation is usually considered physically stable. Initial and regular subsequent measurements are required for an
exact stability assessment. Apart from light scattering techniques,
microscopic methods can be employed to monitor changes in
droplet size. Thus, electron microscopy is not only a valuable
tool for formulation characterisation, but also for the stability
assessment of nanoemulsions since certain changes in formulation properties remain undetected during DLS analysis, as detailed
below.
2.2. Laser light scattering versus electron microscopy
In context with nanoemulsion characterisation and stability
assessment, DLS exhibits certain limitations and may provide
incomplete information. Firstly, it may fail to recognise the
presence of a small population of large droplets present in
nanoemulsions (Benita and Levy, 1993). Likewise, other surfactant aggregates such as liposomal vesicles or lamellar structures
are not detected; the exact composition of the colloidal system
thus remains unknown. However, such structures are frequent
by-products of high-pressure homogenisation and should be
accounted for (Klang et al., 2011a). Fig. 1B demonstrates the composition of such a mixed colloidal dispersion of nano-sized oil droplets
and liposomes. Moreover, the shape of the analysed oil droplets is
usually assumed to be a perfect sphere for calculation of the DLS
results, which is not always the case. Thus, determined particle
sizes for droplets of variable shape may not be entirely representative. Furthermore, most samples have to be diluted prior to
DLS measurements to ensure sufcient transparency for accurate
88
droplet size determination (Klang and Valenta, 2011c). As a consequence, reversible destabilisation phenomena such as occulation
or the appearance of larger aggregates may remain unnoticed.
In order to account for these issues, additional techniques of
analysis are highly recommendable. Methods such as sedimentation eld ow fractionation (Benita and Levy, 1993), nuclear
magnetic resonance spectroscopy (Norden et al., 2001; Takegami
et al., 2008) or Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (Scheuing,
1990; Whittinghill et al., 1999) have been proposed in this context. However, the microscopic visualisation of the investigated
nanoemulsions might represent the most reliable and informative
method for formulation characterisation.
When employing microscopic techniques for nanoemulsion
characterisation, the presence of larger droplets is not an entirely
uncommon observation (Hatanaka et al., 2010; Preetz et al., 2010),
albeit a rarely reported one. Experience has shown that it is possible to obtain excellent DLS data for nanoemulsions over months of
stability monitoring while a microscopic analysis of the same sample reveals a denite change of the internal structure. Recently,
Preetz et al. (2010) demonstrated the importance of microscopic
analysis for the characterisation of nanoemulsions and nanocapsules. It was found that the mean droplet size determined by
DLS was around 150 nm for all investigated systems. In contrast,
freeze-fracture TEM revealed variable droplet sizes between 50
and 500 nm with the highest frequency around 100 nm, which was
additionally conrmed by atomic force microscopy (Preetz et al.,
2010).
Thus, the importance of electron microscopic techniques for
the analysis of nanoemulsion droplet size and overall morphology
needs to be emphasized. Surprisingly, hardly any review articles
can be found on this specic topic. An excellent overview of cryo
TEM analysis of colloidal systems in general was recently published
(Kuntsche et al., 2011). Cryo TEM is certainly among the most useful
techniques for the investigation of nanoemulsions since it delivers
detailed information about the internal structure of the observed
colloidal systems in their native state. The present review aims to
give an overview of the electron microscopy techniques that have
been employed for the analysis of nanoemulsions so far and possible future developments. It is important to note that all mentioned
techniques have their benets and drawbacks. In any case, the studied images have to be representative of the whole sample. Image
analysis software should be employed only for systems with a suitable contrast and composition. Several rounds of analysis are highly
recommendable. A good overview of the investigated systems can
be obtained by combination of DLS or static laser diffraction and
cryo TEM (Kuntsche et al., 2009).
2.3. Development of microscopic techniques for visualisation of
nanoemulsions
Optical light microscopy can be considered the simplest method
to examine the microstructure of nanoemulsions. However, it was
soon realised that this technique is futile for the exact visualisation of nano-sized droplets below 500 nm (Benita and Levy, 1993;
Drzymala and Krajczyk, 1985). In context with nanoemulsions, the
applications of light microscopy are limited to the detection of
pronounced destabilisation phenomena such as coalescence and
Ostwald ripening (Jumaa and Mueller, 1998; Welin-Berger and
Bergenstahl, 2000) or monitoring of phase transitions (Jahanzad
et al., 2010; Rao and McClements, 2010). Likewise, the presence of
larger aggregates, droplets (Baker and Naguib, 2005; Burapapadh
89
90
appear to be absorbed. In the case of ordered or crystalline sample material, this results in diffraction contrast, which is strongly
dependent on the crystal orientation. In amorphous materials,
a mass thickness contrast is formed, where the image brightness depends on the local mass thickness. Thus, darker regions
in the bright eld image mode are regions of higher scattering
(Sawyer and Grubb, 1996). For more detailed information on electron microscopy, general literature is recommended (Bozzola and
Russell, 1999; Egerton, 2005).
In case of nanoemulsions, cryo preparation methods are of
course the most suitable methods of analysis. If cryo TEM is not
available, a conventional negative staining analysis with or without dilution can be performed on nanoemulsions to obtain certain
basic informations. Staining techniques are frequently employed
for imaging of colloidal systems with TEM since they are easy, fast
and universally applicable (Kuntsche et al., 2011; Massover, 2008).
The most common staining agents are salts of heavy metals such as
molybdenum, tungsten or uranium which possess atomic numbers
between 42 and 92. These agents must be benign to the wet specimens, form a thin glassy layer upon drying and must resist electron
beam radiation damage to a satisfying extent (Massover, 2008).
In context with nanoemulsion analysis, phosphotungstic acid or
its salt solutions (Desai et al., 2008; Ganta and Amiji, 2009; Liu
and Yu, 2010; Pathan and Setty, 2011; Seki et al., 2004) or uranyl
acetate (Araujo et al., 2011; Hatanaka et al., 2010; Schalbart et al.,
2010) are most frequently employed. During sample preparation,
a droplet of the nanoemulsion is placed on a carbon coated grid
onto which it is rapidly adsorbed. Subsequently, an aqueous solution of a heavy metal salt is applied for staining. The sample is
then left to dry and nally observed by TEM at room temperature. This technique allows for the identication of the dehydrated
shells of the nanoemulsion droplets which are stabilised by surfactant. The strongly scattering metal ions form an amorphous
shield enveloping the weakly scattering oil droplets to enhance the
electron microscopy contrast (Brenner and Horne, 1959). A high
reverse contrast is thus seen in bright eld TEM images, with light
droplets against a darker background. Negative staining can be used
to visualise the size, shape and internal structure of the sample.
The negative stain not only provides contrast for weakly scattering
specimens, but also physical support against collapse of the sample
structure during drying and protection against electron beam damage (Massover, 2008). The sample may also be coated with a carbon
lm under ambient conditions before investigation (Burapapadh
et al., 2010).
However, it should be kept in mind that conventional electron
microscopy is prone to artefacts in case of surfactant solutions, i.e.
hydrated colloidal dispersions (Egelhaaf et al., 2000). For hydrated
samples such as nanoemulsions, the factors affecting the preservation of the structural integrity are identical in both TEM and SEM
(Mueller, 1991). Both drying and staining techniques can affect the
structure and morphology of the sample; thus, great care should
be taken during interpretation of the obtained images (Friedrich
et al., 2010). Severe shrinkage or even complete collapse, selective dimensional modication and aggregation of the constituents
of colloidal systems due to complete dehydration and drying usually cause strong structural changes. In addition, the use of heavy
metal salts leads to a selective sample appearance since only structures that can be reached by or react with the staining agents can
be detected (Hayat, 2000). Consequently, the uppermost surface
of the sample as well as the compounds of the system that can
chemically react with the staining agents are clearly observed while
many compounds of the sample remain practically invisible. As a
result, the nal EM images may describe completely modied structures which have nothing in common with the original formulation
morphology. Moreover, conventional negative staining on continuous carbon support lms bears the risk of sample distortion due
to adsorption and attening during the drying of the thin aqueous lm of negative stain or evaporation in the TEM (Harris, 2008).
Apart from adsorption artefacts, variable spreading and incomplete
specimen coverage by the stain solution can lead to non-uniform
staining results. Specimen distortion from surface tension forces
during evaporative drying or the formation of a saturated salt solution before the nal drying may occur as well (Massover, 2008).
Techniques based on cryoxation and low temperature electron
microscopy help to overcome these major problems. However, not
all TEM laboratories are equipped with cryo electron microscopy
facilities. Therefore, the application of air-dried negative staining
techniques for biological specimens or other aqueous systems such
as colloidal dispersions remains justied (Harris, 2008).
91
Fig. 2. (A) Electron micrographs obtained after negative staining of a lipid nanoemulsion system (lipid nano-spheres, LNS ,left-hand side) and a conventional fat emulsion
for parenteral nutrition (LM, right-hand side). Images reprinted from Seki et al. (2004) with permission from Elsevier. (B) TEM photomicrograph of a carbamazepine-loaded
nanoemulsion. Image reprinted from Kelmann et al. (2007) with permission from Elsevier. (C) TEM micrographs of nanoemulsions prepared with different types of oil:
(1) phenyl trimethicone, (2) poly-dimethylsiloxane, (3) cetyl ethylhexanoate, (4) dioctanoyl-decanoyl-glycerol, (5) isopropyl myristate and (6) liquid parafn. Scale bars
represent 150 nm. Images reprinted from Nam et al. (2010) with permission from the American Chemical Society (ACS). (D) TEM photomicrograph of a parenteral emulsion
after negative staining using phosphotungstic acid. The scale bar represents 500 nm. Image reprinted from Ganta et al. (2008) with permission from Elsevier. (E), (F) TEM
photomicrographs of nano-sized emulsions with castor oil (E) or soybean oil (F). The scale bars represent 500 nm. For the latter system, coalescence phenomena are visible.
Images reprinted from Ibrahim et al. (2009) with permission from Elsevier. (G) TEM photomicrographs of thalidomid-loaded and blank nanoemulsions with polysorbate. The
scale bars represent 100 nm.
Image reprinted from Araujo et al. (2011) with permission from Elsevier.
or destruction has to be expected under the dehydration conditions of electron microscopy (Liu and Yu, 2010). Even if images
of more or less intact oil droplets are obtained, the information
that is conveyed is frequently limited since a very restricted area of
the investigated specimen may remain intact and can be presented
(Fig. 2G). In this case, no information is obtained about the polydispersity of the droplet size distribution or the presence of additional
structures within the sample.
Apparently, conventional TEM may be most successfully
employed for the real-space determination of nanoemulsion
droplets after continuous phase-evaporation if the employed oil
has a large molecular weight, as observed by Mason et al. (2006). A
silicon oil-in-water nanoemulsion was stained with uranyl acetate
and placed on a TEM grid coated with a monolayer polymer
lm. After evaporation of the water the sample was observed at
92
Fig. 3. Comparison of cryo TEM and conventional TEM after negative staining with uranyl acetate: nanoemulsions stabilised by either 5% (A and B) or 2.5% (w/w) of sucrose
stearate (C and D) were investigated with both methods. On the left hand side (A, C), the cryo TEM images are given. On the right hand side (B, D), the corresponding images
obtained by conventional TEM at room temperature are given. For conventional TEM, the risk of beam damage is imminent as indicated in the lower right hand corner of
image D.
Image A and B are reprinted from Klang et al. (2011b), image C is reprinted from Klang et al. (2011a) with permission from Elsevier.
primarily the nature of the oil which is decisive for the quality of
the obtained images, but the efcacy of the employed surfactant
to stabilise the oil droplets. In Fig. 3, a conventional cosmetic oil
of a molecular weight around 300 g/mol was emulsied using different amounts of a sucrose ester surfactant. Perfectly clear phase
boundaries of the droplet shells after evaporation in the TEM were
found for systems of an ideal surfactant concentration of 2.5% (w/w)
and high physical stability (Fig. 3D). A surplus of surfactant did not
improve the formulations general properties (Fig. 3B), but rather
destabilised the system by introducing aggregates and leading to
droplet deformation. The obtained images of both formulations corresponded comparatively well to the native structures as observed
by cryo TEM. Although the obtained TEM images are of course far
from describing the real state of the emulsion, they provide certain information that might be useful in nanoemulsion studies, e.g.
about sample stability against external stress. The stability of the
emulsied oil droplets is after all an important quality parameter.
However, it is again emphasised that the potential of TEM at room
temperature is limited to such basic aspects; an exact visualisation
of the droplet shape remains conned to cryo TEM. Interpretation
of TEM images of nanoemulsions should therefore be performed
with caution.
93
94
Fig. 4. (A) Cryo SEM images of nanoemulsions. Image reprinted from Saupe et al. (2006) with permission from Elsevier. (B) Freeze-fracture SEM images of conventional
nanoemulsions stabilised by lecithin (L) or oleylamine (O) and corresponding silica-coated lecithin (LSA) or oleylamin (OSA) nanoemulsions.
Images reprinted from Eskandar et al. (2009) with kind permission from Springer Science and Business Media.
95
then covered with a strengthening layer of electron-lucent carbon to stabilise the ultra-thin metal lm (Preetz et al., 2010).
More specically, the cold fractured surface, possibly etched,
is shadowed with evaporated platinum or gold at an average
angle of 45 in a high vacuum evaporator. A second coat of carbon, evaporated perpendicular to the average surface plane, is
often performed to improve stability of the replica coating. The
topographical features of the frozen, fractured surface are thus
transformed into variations in the thickness of the deposited
platinum layer of the replica (Severs, 2007).
IV. The specimen is then returned to ambient temperature and
pressure and the extremely fragile pre-shadowed metal
replica of the fracture surface is released from the underlying biological material by careful chemical digestion with acid
solutions or detergents. The still-oating replica is thoroughly
washed free from residual chemicals, carefully placed on ne
grids, dried and then investigated in the TEM (Preetz et al., 2010;
Severs and Robenek, 2008).
Further details and practical advice on freeze-fracture electron microscopy can be found in the literature (Gulik-Krzywicki,
1997; Severs, 2007). Overall, freeze-fracture electron microscopy
can be employed for the analysis of a large spectrum of different materials, including liquids and dispersions, at intermediate
to low resolution. Freeze-fracture TEM (FF-TEM) is well adapted
to study lipid-containing colloidal suspensions, such as liposomes,
nanoemulsions and nanoparticles despite the relatively low signal
to noise ratio of the replicas. Polymer solutions, microemulsions
and biological systems can be investigated as well (Brandl et al.,
1997; Gulik-Krzywicki, 1997; Yan et al., 2005; Zhou et al., 2010).
The most important feature of this technique is the tendency of the
fracture plane to follow a plane through the central hydrophobic
core of frozen membranes, thus splitting them in half. As a result,
planar views of the internal structure of the samples are obtained
(Severs, 2007).
The main drawback of FF-TEM is that the obtained information
strongly depends on the quality of the fracture (Belkoura et al.,
2004). Freeze-fracturing techniques are complex in nature and the
different steps of sample preparation, such as chemical xation,
cryoprotective pre-treatment, cryoxation, freeze-fracturing, etching and replication, may signicantly inuence the appearance of
96
Fig. 6. Freeze-fracture TEM micrographs of different lecithin-based nanoemulsions. Images reprinted from Zhou et al. (2010) with kind permission from Springer Science
and Business Media. The inuence of increasing contents of glycerol within the formulation is demonstrated by decreasing particle sizes and a more homogeneous droplet
size distribution. Coalescence phenomena as indicated by the arrows in image A can be detected.
of less than 200 nm. Secondly, cryo-sectioning using high pressure freezing devices after vitrication of the bulk sample can be
performed (Moor, 1987; Mueller and Moor, 1984). In this context, different cutting techniques to obtain vitried sections thin
enough for high resolution observation are available (Al-Amoudi
et al., 2003; Dubochet et al., 1983; McDowall et al., 1983). Thirdly,
a lm of the liquid sample can be prepared that is subsequently
vitried as a thin layer. The thickness of the lms can be controlled
interferometrically before vitrication (Denkov et al., 1996). The
latter two methods can be applied for various tasks, but are rather
complex and demanding in nature. Thus, vitrication after blotting
of the sample is the most widely employed technique.
The sample preparation for cryo TEM involves three main
steps:
I. A small aliquot (approximately 3 l) of a uid suspension containing the sample is applied to the surface of a supporting
substrate such as a holey or continuous carbon lm that is
attached to the surface of a standard TEM specimen grid (Fukami
and Adachi, 1965; Reichelt et al., 1977).
II. Subsequently, the droplet is carefully blotted with lter paper
until most of the supernatant liquid is removed and only a thin
layer of approximately 100 nm thickness is left on the support
substrate. On perforated carbon support lms, the thin sample
lm is left stretched over the holes (Fig. 7A).
III. The thin uid layer is rapidly immersed into a suitable cryogen of high heat capacity, which leads to instantaneous and
contaminant-free freezing. This vitrication or shock-freezing
by propelling the grids into a cryogen is ideally performed by
means of a plunging device and a humidity- and temperaturecontrolled environmental vitrication system (Dubochet et al.,
1987; Norden et al., 2001). The vitried samples then need to be
transferred into the TEM cryo holder of the microscope under
97
Fig. 7. Images of a typical nanoemulsion analysed by cryo TEM after plunge freezing. (A) A conventional TEM grid coated with a holey carbon lm is shown. The letters
indicate the carbon layer (C), the holes in the carbon lm (H) and the frozen hydrated sample (S). The scheme on the right hand side depicts the formation of the thin liquid
sample layer which remains after blotting with a lter paper just before the freezing procedure. (B) Segregation of nanoemulsion droplets: smaller droplets remain in the
thinner parts of the sample lm while larger ones are only found in the thicker parts of the sample layer.
98
99
Fig. 8. (A) Cryo TEM micrograph of a positively charged nanoemulsion containing deformed bicompartmental structures. Image reprinted from Teixeira et al. (2000) with
kind permission from Springer Science and Business Media. (B) Cryo TEM image which presumably shows similar structures containing phytosphingosine and ceramides.
The latter image appears to suffer from severe out-of-focus problems, perhaps due to insufcient freezing of the sample. The large structures indicated by the arrows cannot
be clearly identied as emulsion droplets and might be ice crystals.
Image reprinted with permission from Elsevier (Yilmaz and Borchert, 2005).
Fig. 9. Visualisation of differences in formulation morphology: cryo TEM micrographs of diluted nanoemulsions (1:10, v/v) stabilised by (A) 2.5% of lecithin alone (mean
particle size: 186.41 11.06, n = 3) or (C) 2.5% of lecithin and -cyclodextrin (mean particle size: 175.82 00.47, n = 3), (B) 2.5% of sucrose stearate alone (mean particle size:
141.21 08.73, n = 3) or (D) 2.5% of sucrose stearate and -cyclodextrin (mean particle size: 144.77 10.61, n = 3). The addition of the cyclodextrin apparently promotes the
formation of spherical droplets in case of lecithin-based systems (Fig. 7A versus 7C). The arrowheads included in Image 7A indicate the presence of vesicular structures, such
as liposomes and multilamellar layers. In case of sucrose-stearate based systems, hardly any differences were observed after addition of -CD.
All images reprinted from Klang et al. (2011a) with permission from Elsevier.
100
Fig. 10. (A) Cryo TEM micrograph of a nanoemulsion stabilised by lecithin, sucrose stearate and -cyclodextrin. The excess of surfactant induces the formation of additional
multilamellar structures. Image reprinted from Klang et al. (2010) with permission from Elsevier. (B) Cryo TEM micrograph of a nanoemulsion stabilised by comparatively
high amounts of sucrose stearate (5%, w/w) after dilution with distilled water (1:10, v/v). It remains to be investigated whether the deformation of the droplets was caused
during production or during sample preparation for cryo TEM.
Image reprinted from Klang et al. (2011b).
Cryo EELS has not yet found broader application for nanoemulsion characterisation. Firstly, frozen hydrated nanoemulsions
usually contain specic atoms like N, P, Cl or F in such low concentrations that the detection limit of cryo EELS does not allow to
Fig. 11. Application of cryo EELS for the analysis of frozen hydrated samples: differentiation of calcium carbonate particles (A) from ice crystal formations (B). The scale
bars represent 100 nm. The corresponding chemical composition of the analysed compound is depicted on the right hand side (C, D). Vitried specimens were examined in
a eld emission Tecnay F20 TEM operating at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV using an Oxford CT3500 cryo holder (Oxford Instruments, UK) that maintained the vitried
specimens at 160 C during sample observation. Images were recorded digitally on a cooled UltraScan CCD (Gatan, USA).
101
Baker, M.T., Naguib, M., 2005. Propofol: the challenges of formulation. Anesthesiology 103, 860876.
Bali, V., Ali, M., Ali, J., 2010. Study of surfactant combinations and development of
a novel nanoemulsion for minimising variations in bioavailability of ezetimibe.
Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 76, 410420.
Baspinar, Y., 2009. Nano- and microemulsions for topical application of poorly soluble immunosuppressives. PhD Thesis. Free University Berlin, Germany.
Baumeister, W., 2002. Electron tomography: towards visualizing the molecular
organization of the cytoplasm. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12, 679684.
Belkoura, L., Stubenrauch, C., Strey, R., 2004. Freeze fracture direct imaging: a new
freeze fracture method for specimen preparation in cryo-transmission electron
microscopy. Langmuir 20, 43914399.
Benita, S., Levy, M.Y., 1993. Submicron emulsions as colloidal drug carriers for
intravenous administration: comprehensive physicochemical characterization.
J. Pharm. Sci. 82, 10691079.
Benita, S., Magalhaes, N.S., Cave, G., Seiller, M., 1991. The stability and in vitro release
kinetics of a clobride emulsion. Int. J. Pharm. 76, 225237.
Bilbao-Sainz, C., Avena-Bustillos, R.J., Wood, D.F., Williams, T.G., McHugh, T.H., 2010.
Nanoemulsions prepared by a low-energy emulsication method applied to
edible lms. J. Agric. Food Chem. 58, 1193211938.
Bogner, A., Jouneau, P.H., Thollet, G., Basset, D., Gauthier, C., 2007. A history of scanning electron microscopy developments: towards wet-STEM imaging. Micron
38, 390401.
Bogner, A., Thollet, G., Basset, D., Jouneau, P.H., Gauthier, C., 2005. Wet STEM: a
new development in environmental SEM for imaging nano-objects included in
a liquid phase. Ultramicroscopy 104, 290301.
Bouchemal, K., Briancon, S., Perrier, E., Fessi, H., 2004. Nano-emulsion formulation
using spontaneous emulsication: solvent, oil and surfactant optimisation. Int.
J. Pharm. 280, 241251.
Bouchet-Marquis, C., Hoenger, A., 2011. Cryo-electron tomography on vitried sections: a critical analysis of benets and limitations for structural cell biology.
Micron 42, 152162.
Bozzola, J.J., Russell, L.D., 1999. Electron Microscopy. Jones & Bartlett Learning Publishers, Sudbury, Massachusetts.
Brandl, M., Drechsler, M., Bachmann, D., Bauer, K.H., 1997. Morphology of semisolid
aqueous phosphatidylcholine dispersions, a freeze fracture electron microscopy
study. Chem. Phys. Lipids 87, 6572.
Brenner, S., Horne, R.W., 1959. A negative staining method for high resolution electron microscopy of viruses. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 34, 103110.
Buchheim, W., 1982. Aspects of sample preparation for freeze-fracture/freeze-etch
studies of proteins and lipids in food systems. Food Microstruct. 1, 189208.
Bullock, G.R., 1984. The current status of xation for electron microscopy: a review.
J. Microsc. 133, 115.
Burapapadh, K., Kumpugdee-Vollrath, M., Chantasart, D., Sriamornsak, P., 2010.
Fabrication of pectin-based nanoemulsions loaded with itraconazole for pharmaceutical application. Carb. Polym. 82, 384393.
Burauer, S., Belkoura, L., Stubenrauch, C., Strey, R., 2003. Bicontinuous microemulsions revisited: a new approach to freeze fracture electron microscopy (FFEM).
Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 228, 159170.
Calder, P.C., Jensen, G.L., Koletzko, B.V., Singer, P., Wanten, G.J., 2010. Lipid emulsions
in parenteral nutrition of intensive care patients: current thinking and future
directions. Intensive Care Med. 36, 735749.
Calderilla-Fajardo, S.B., Cazares-Delgadillo, J., Villalobos-Garcia, R., QuintanarGuerrero, D., Ganem-Quintanar, A., Robles, R., 2006. Inuence of sucrose esters
on the in vivo percutaneous penetration of octyl methoxycinnamate formulated in nanocapsules, nanoemulsion, and emulsion. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 32,
107113.
Corts-Munoz,
M., Chevalier-Lucia, D., Dumay, E., 2009. Characteristics of submicron
emulsions prepared by ultra-high pressure homogenisation: effect of chilled or
frozen storage. Food Hydrocolloids 23, 640654.
Daniels, R., 2001. Galenic Principles of Modern Skin Care Products, Skin Care Forum.
Society for Dermopharmacy.
Danino, D., Talmon, Y., 2000. Cryo-transmission electron microscopy. In: Baskin,
A., Norde, W. (Eds.), Physical Chemistry of Biological Interfaces. Marcel Dekker,
New York, pp. 799821.
Denkov, N.D., Yoshimura, H., Nagayama, K., Kouyama, T., 1996. Nanoparticle arrays
in freely suspended vitried lms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 23542357.
Desai, A., Vyas, T., Amiji, M., 2008. Cytotoxicity and apoptosis enhancement in brain
tumor cells upon coadministration of paclitaxel and ceramide in nanoemulsion
formulations. J. Pharm. Sci. 97, 27452756.
do Amaral, M., Bogner, A., Gauthier, C., Thollet, G., Jouneau, P.-H., Cavaille, J.Y., Asua, J.M., 2005. Novel experimental technique for the determination of
monomer droplet size distribution in miniemulsion. Macromol. Rapid Commun.
26, 365368.
Drzymala, J., Krajczyk, L., 1985. Electron microscopic observation of ne polydispersed emulsion. J. Colloids Surf. 15, 249253.
Du Plessis, J., Tiedt, L.R., Kotze, A.F., Van Wyk, C.J., Ackermann, C., 1987. A transmission electron microscope method for determination of droplet size in parenteral
fat emulsions using negative staining. Int. J. Pharm. 46, 177178.
Du Plessis, J., Tiedt, L.R., Van Wyk, C.J., Ackermann, C., 1986. A new transmission
electron microscope method for the determination of particle size in parenteral
fat emulsions. Int. J. Pharm. 34, 173174.
Dubochet, J., Adrian, M., Chang, J.J., Lepault, J., McDowall, A.W., 1987. Cryoelectron microscopy of vitried specimens. In: Steinbrecht, R., Zierold, K. (Eds.),
Cryotechniques in Biological Electron Microscopy. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp.
114131.
102
Dubochet, J., Chang, J.-J., Freeman, R., Lepault, J., McDowall, A.W., 1982. Frozen aqueous suspensions. Ultramicroscopy 10, 5562.
Dubochet, J., McDowall, A., Menge, B., Schmid, E.N., Lickfeld, K.G., 1983. Electron
microscopy of frozen-hydrated bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 155, 381390.
Egelhaaf, S.U., Schurtenberger, P., Mueller, M., 2000. New controlled environment
vitrication system for cryo-transmission electron microscopy: design and
application to surfactant solutions. J. Microsc. 200, 128139.
Egerton, R.F., 1986. Electron Energy-loss Spectroscopy in the Electron microscope.
Plenum Press, New York, USA.
Egerton, R.F., 2005. Physical Principles of Electron Microscopy: An Introduction to
TEM, SEM and AEM. Springer, New York, USA.
Eskandar, N.G., Simovic, S., Prestidge, C.A., 2009. Nanoparticle coated submicron
emulsions: sustained in-vitro release and improved dermal delivery of all-transretinol. Pharm. Res. 26, 17641775.
Fang, J.Y., Leu, Y.L., Chang, C.C., Lin, C.H., Tsai, Y.H., 2004. Lipid nano/submicron
emulsions as vehicles for topical urbiprofen delivery. Drug Deliv. 11,
97105.
Fox, C.B., 2009. Squalene emulsions for parenteral vaccine and drug delivery.
Molecules 14, 32863312.
Frank, W., 1992. Electron Tomography: Three-Dimensional Imaging with the Transmission Electron Microscope. Plenum Press, New York, USA.
Friedrich, H., Frederik, P.M., de With, G., Sommerdijk, N.A., 2010. Imaging of selfassembled structures: interpretation of TEM and cryo-TEM images. Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 49, 78507858.
Fukami, A., Adachi, K., 1965. A new method of preparation of a self-perforated micro
plastic grid and its application. J. Electron Microsc. (Tokyo) 14, 112118.
Ganta, S., Amiji, M., 2009. Coadministration of Paclitaxel and curcumin in nanoemulsion formulations to overcome multidrug resistance in tumor cells. Mol. Pharm.
6, 928939.
Ganta, S., Paxton, J.W., Baguley, B.C., Garg, S., 2008. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of chlorambucil delivered in parenteral emulsion. Int. J. Pharm. 360,
115121.
Goldstein, G.I., Newbury, D.E., Echlin, P., Joy, D.C., Fiori, C., Lifshin, E., 1981. Scanning
Electron Microscopy and X-ray Microanalysis. Plenum Press, New York, USA.
Groves, M.J., Wineberg, M., Brian, A.P.R., 1985. The presence of liposomal
material in phosphatide stabilized emulsions. J. Dispersion Sci. Technol. 2,
237243.
Gulik-Krzywicki, T., 1997. Freeze-fracture transmission electron microscopy. Curr.
Opin. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2, 137144.
Hamilton-Attwell, V.L., Du Plessis, J., Van Wyk, C.J., 1987. A new scanning electron
microscope (SEM) method for the determination of particle size in parenteral
fat emulsions. J. Microsc. 145, 347349.
Harris, J.R., 2008. Negative staining across holes: application to bril and tubular
structures. Micron 39, 168176.
Hatanaka, J., Chikamori, H., Sato, H., Uchida, S., Debari, K., Onoue, S., Yamada, S., 2010.
Physicochemical and pharmacological characterization of alpha-tocopherolloaded nano-emulsion system. Int. J. Pharm. 396, 188193.
Hatziantoniou, S., Deli, G., Nikas, Y., Demetzos, C., Papaioannou, G.T., 2007. Scanning electron microscopy study on nanoemulsions and solid lipid nanoparticles
containing high amounts of ceramides. Micron 38, 819823.
Hayat, M.A., 2000. Principles and Techniques of Electron Microscopy: Biological
Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Hoeller, S., Sperger, A., Valenta, C., 2009. Lecithin based nanoemulsions: a comparative study of the inuence of non-ionic surfactants and the cationic
phytosphingosine on physicochemical behaviour and skin permeation. Int. J.
Pharm. 370, 181186.
Hoppe, W., 1981. Three-dimensional electron microscopy. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 10, 563592.
Ibrahim, S.S., Awad, G.A., Geneidi, A., Mortada, N.D., 2009. Comparative effects of different cosurfactants on sterile prednisolone acetate ocular submicron emulsions
stability and release. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 69, 225231.
Ilan, E., Amselem, S., Weisspapir, M., Schwarz, J., Yogev, A., Zawoznik, E., Friedman, D.,
1996. Improved oral delivery of desmopressin via a novel vehicle: mucoadhesive
submicron emulsion. Pharm. Res. 13, 10831087.
Isaacson, M., Johnson, D., 1975. The microanalysis of light elements using transmitted energy loss electrons. Ultramicroscopy 1, 3352.
Jahanzad, F., Josephides, J., Mansourian, A., Sajjadi, S., 2010. Dynamics of transitional
phase inversion emulsication: effect of addition time on the type of inversion
and drop size. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 49, 76317637.
Jores, K., 2004a. Lipid nanodispersions as drug carrier systemsa physicochemical characterization. PhD Thesis. Martin-Luther-University, Halle-Wittenberg,
Germany.
Jores, K., Mehnert, W., Drechsler, M., Bunjes, H., Johann, C., Maeder, K., 2004b.
Investigations on the structure of solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and oil-loaded
solid lipid nanoparticles by photon correlation spectroscopy, eld-ow fractionation and transmission electron microscopy. J. Control. Release 95, 217
227.
Jumaa, M., Mueller, B.W., 1998. The effect of oil components and homogenization
conditions on the physicochemical properties and stability of parenteral fat
emulsions. Int. J. Pharm. 163, 8189.
Kelmann, R.G., Kuminek, G., Teixeira, H.F., Koester, L.S., 2007. Carbamazepine parenteral nanoemulsions prepared by spontaneous emulsication process. Int. J.
Pharm. 342, 231239.
Kesselman, E., Talmon, Y., Bang, B., Abbas, S., Li, Z., Lodge, T.P., 2005. Cryogenic
transmission electron microscopy imaging of vesicles formed by a polystyrenepolyisoprene diblock copolymer. Maromolecules 38, 67796781.
Kim, G., Sousa, A., Meyers, D., Shope, M., Libera, M., 2006. Diffuse polymer interfaces
in lobed nanoemulsions preserved in aqueous media. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128,
65706571.
Klang, S.H., Baszkinb, A., Benita, S., 1996. The stability of piroxicam incorporated in a
positively-charged submicron emulsion for ocular administration. Int. J. Pharm.
132, 3344.
Klang, V., Matsko, N., Raupach, K., El-Hagin, N., Valenta, C., 2011a. Development
of sucrose stearate-based nanoemulsions and optimisation through gammacyclodextrin. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm..
Klang, V., Matsko, N., Zimmermann, A.M., Vojnikovic, E., Valenta, C., 2010. Enhancement of stability and skin permeation by sucrose stearate and cyclodextrins in
progesterone nanoemulsions. Int. J. Pharm. 393, 152160.
Klang, V., Schwarz, J.C., Matsko, N., Rezvani, E., El-Hagin, N., Wirth, M., Valenta, C.,
2011b. Semi-solid sucrose stearate-based emulsions as dermal drug delivery
systems. Pharmaceutics 3, 275306.
Klang, V., Valenta, C., 2011c. Lecithin-based nanoemulsions. J. Drug Del. Sci. Tech.
21, 5576.
Knoll, M., 1935. Auadepotentiel und Sekundremission elektronenbestrahlter Krper. Z. Tech. Phys. 16, 467475.
Koning, R.I., Koster, A.J., 2009. Cryo-electron tomography in biology and medicine.
Ann. Anat. 191, 427445.
Kothleitner, G., Hofer, F., 1993. Quantitative microanalysis using electron-loss
spectrometry I. Li and Be in oxides. Microsc. Microanal. Microstruct. 4,
539560.
Krivanek, O.L., Mory, C., Tence, M., Colliex, C., 1991. EELS quantication near the
single-atom detection level. Microsc. Microanal. Microstruct. 2, 257267.
Kuntsche, J., Horst, J.C., Bunjes, H., 2011. Cryogenic transmission electron microscopy
(cryo-TEM) for studying the morphology of colloidal drug delivery systems. Int.
J. Pharm., doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.02.001.
Kuntsche, J., Klaus, K., Steiniger, F., 2009. Size determinations of colloidal fat emulsions: a comparative study. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 5, 384395.
Leapman, R.D., 2003. Detecting single atoms of calcium and iron in biological structures by electron energy-loss spectrum-imaging. J. Microsc. 210, 515.
Lepault, J., Booy, F.P., Dubochet, J., 1983. Electron microscopy of frozen biological
suspensions. J. Microsc. (Oxford) 129, 89102.
Liu, C.H., Yu, S.Y., 2010. Cationic nanoemulsions as non-viral vectors for plasmid
DNA delivery. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 79, 509515.
Marxer, E.E., Brussler, J., Becker, A., Schummelfeder, J., Schubert, R., Nimsky, C.,
Bakowsky, U., 2011. Development and characterization of new nanoscaled ultrasound active lipid dispersions as contrast agents. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 77,
430437.
Masaki, Y., Tanaka, M., Nishikawa, T., 2003. Physicochemical compatibility of
propofol-lidocaine mixture. Anesth. Analg. 97, 16461651.
Mason, T.G., Wilking, J.N., Meleson, K., Chang, C.B., Graves, S.M., 2006. Nanoemulsions: formation, structure, and physical properties. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 18,
R635R666.
Massover, W.H., 2008. On the experimental use of light metal salts for negative
staining. Microsc. Microanal. 14, 126137.
Massover, W.H., 2011. New and unconventional approaches for advancing
resolution in biological transmission electron microscopy by improving macromolecular specimen preparation and preservation. Micron 42, 141151.
McDowall, A.W., Chang, J.-J., Freeman, R., Lepault, J., Walter, C.A., Dubochet, J., 1983.
Electron microscopy of frozen-hydrated sections of vitreous ice and vitried
biological samples. J. Microsc. (Oxford) 131, 19.
Menold, R., Luttge, B., Kaiser, W., Schmidt, A., 1972. Gefrierbruchtechnik zur
Untersuchung von Suspensionen und Emulsionen. Chem. Ing. Tech. 44, 1226
1232.
Mohammed, A.R., Weston, N., Coombes, A.G.A., Fitzgerald, M., Perrie, Y., 2004. Liposome formulation of poorly water soluble drugs: optimisation of drug loading
and ESEM analysis of stability. Int. J. Pharm. 285, 2334.
Moor, H., 1987. Theory and practice of high-pressure freezing. In: Steinbrecht, R.A.,
Zierold, K. (Eds.), Cryo-techniques in Biological Electron Microscopy. SpringerVerlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 175191.
Mou, D., Chen, H., Du, D., Mao, C., Wan, J., Xu, H., Yang, X., 2008. Hydrogel-thickened
nanoemulsion system for topical delivery of lipophilic drugs. Int. J. Pharm. 353,
270276.
Mueller, M., 1991. Cryotechniques in biologycal electron microscopy. Encyclopedia
Hum. Biol. 2, 721730.
Mueller, M., Moor, H., 1984. Cryoxation of thick specimens by high pressure freezing. In: Mueller, M., Becker, R.P., Boyde, A., Wolosewick, J.J. (Eds.), The Science
of Biological Specimen Preparation. SEM, AMF OHare, Chicago, Illinois, pp.
131138.
Nam, Y.S., Kim, J.W., Shim, J., Han, S.H., Kim, H.K., 2010. Nanosized emulsions stabilized by semisolid polymer interphase. Langmuir 26, 1303813043.
Norden, T.P., Siekmann, B., Lundquist, S., Malmsten, M., 2001. Physicochemical
characterisation of a drug-containing phospholipid-stabilised o/w emulsion for
intravenous administration. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 13, 393401.
Oleshko, V.P., Gijbels, R.H., Van Daele, A.J., Jacob, W.A., Xu, Y.E., Wang, S.E., Park, I.Y.,
Kang, T.S., 1998. Combined characterization of composite tabular silver halide
microcrystals by cryo-EFTEM/EELS and cryo-STEM/EDX techniques. Microsc.
Res. Tech. 42, 108122.
Orlova, E.V., Sherman, M.B., Chiu, W., Mowri, H., Smith, L.C., Gotto Jr., A.M., 1999.
Three-dimensional structure of low density lipoproteins by electron cryomicroscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 84208425.
Pathan, I.B., Setty, C.M., 2011. Enhancement of transdermal delivery of tamoxifen
citrate using nanoemulsion vehicle. Int. J. Pharm. Tech. Res. 3, 287297.
103
Sitte, H., Edelmann, L., Neumann, K., 1987. Cryoxation without pretreatment at
ambient pressure. In: Steinbrecht, R., Zierold, K. (Eds.), Cryotechniques in Biological Electron Microscopy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. p.87p.113.
Sjoeblom, E., Friberg, S., 1978. Light-scattering and electron microscopy determinations of association structures in W/O microemulsions. J. Colloid Interface Sci.
67, 1630.
Solans, C., Izquierdo, P., Nolla, J., Azemar, N., Garcia-Celma, M.J., 2005. Nanoemulsions. Curr. Opin. Coll. Int. Sci. 10, 102110.
Sole, I., Pey, C.M., Maestro, A., Gonzalez, C., Porras, M., Solans, C., Gutierrez, J.M.,
2010. Nano-emulsions prepared by the phase inversion composition method:
preparation variables and scale up. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 344, 417423.
Sonneville-Aubrun, O., Simonnet, J.T., LAlloret, F., 2004. Nanoemulsions: a new vehicle for skincare products. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 108109, 145149.
Steinbrecht, R.A., Zierold, K., 1987. Cryo Techniques in Biological Electron
Microscopy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sutton, S.R., Newville, M., Rivers, M.L., 2003. Synchrotron X-ray microscope analysis.
Geophys. Res. Abstracts 5, 13260.
Tadros, T., Izquierdo, P., Esquena, J., Solans, C., 2004. Formation and stability of nanoemulsions. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 108109, 303318.
Takegami, S., Kitamura, K., Kawada, H., Matsumoto, Y., Kitade, T., Ishida, H., Nagata,
C., 2008. Preparation and characterization of a new lipid nano-emulsion containing two cosurfactants, sodium palmitate for droplet size reduction and sucrose
palmitate for stability enhancement. Chem. Pharm. Bull. (Tokyo) 56, 10971102.
Talmon, Y., 1999. Cryogenic temperature transmission electron microscopy in the
study of surfactant systems. In: Binks, B.P.E. (Ed.), Modern Characterization
Methods of Surfactant Systems. Marcel Dekker, New York, p. p147.
Tamilvanan, S., Benita, S., 2004. The potential of lipid emulsion for ocular delivery
of lipophilic drugs. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 58, 357368.
Teixeira, H., Dubernet, C., Rosilio, V., Benita, S., Lepault, J., Erk, I., Couvreur, P., 2000.
New bicompartmental structures are observed when stearylamine is mixed with
triglyceride emulsions. Pharm. Res. 17, 13291332.
Trotta, M., Pattarino, F., Ignoni, T., 2002. Stability of drug-carrier emulsions containing phosphatidylcholine mixtures. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 53, 203208.
Wabel, C., 1998. Inuence of lecithin on structure and stability of parenteral
fat emulsions. PhD Thesis. Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen-Nrnberg,
Germany.
Wang, X., Jiang, Y., Wang, Y., Huang, M., Ho, C., Huang, Q., 2008. Enhancing antiinammatory activity of curcumin through O/W nanoemulsions. Food Chem.,
108.
Welin-Berger, K., Bergenstahl, B., 2000. Inhibition of Ostwald ripening in local anesthetic emulsions by using hydrophobic excipients in the disperse phase. Int. J.
Pharm. 200, 249260.
Whittinghill, J.M., Norton, J., Proctor, A., 1999. A fourier transform infrared spectroscopy study on the effect of temperature on soy lecithin-stabilized emulsions.
J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 76, 13931398.
Yakovlev, S., Misra, M., Shi, S., Firlar, E., Libera, M., 2010. Quantitative nanoscale water
mapping in frozen-hydrated skin by low-loss electron energy-loss spectroscopy.
Ultramicroscopy 110, 866876.
Yan, Y.L., Zhang, N.S., Qu, C.T., Liu, L., 2005. Microstructure of colloidal liquid aphrons
(CLAs) by freeze fracture transmission electron microscopy (FF-TEM). Colloids
Surf. A 264, 139146.
Yilmaz, E., Borchert, H.H., 2005. Design of a phytosphingosine-containing, positivelycharged nanoemulsion as a colloidal carrier system for dermal application of
ceramides. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 60, 9198.
Zeevi, A., Klang, S., Alard, V., Brossard, F., Benita, S., 1994. The design and characterization of a positively charged submicron emulsion containing a sunscreen
agent. Int. J. Pharm. 108, 5768.
Zhou, H., Yue, Y., Liu, G., Li, Y., Zhang, J., Gong, Q., Yan, Z., Duan, M., 2010. Preparation
and characterization of a lecithin nanoemulsion as a topical delivery system.
Nanoscale Res. Lett. 5, 224230.
Zhu, Y., Egerton, R.F., Malac, M., 2001. Concentration limits for the measurement of
boron by electron energy-loss spectroscopy and electron-spectroscopic imaging. Ultramicroscopy 87, 135145.