You are on page 1of 2

10658 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

42 / Friday, March 4, 2005 / Notices

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: donors and family members served by Dated: February 24, 2005.
Thomas E. Balbier, Jr., Executive the OPTN. In addition, the Director, Elizabeth M. Duke,
Director, Advisory Committee on Organ Centers for Disease Control and Administrator.
Transplantation, at (301) 443–1896 or e- Prevention; the Administrator, Centers [FR Doc. 05–4223 Filed 3–3–05; 8:45 am]
mail Thom.Balbier@hrsa.hhs.gov or for Medicare and Medicaid Services; the BILLING CODE 4165–15–P
Sherry Whipple, Public Health Analyst, Commissioner, Food and Drug
Division of Transplantation, at (301) Administration; and the Director,
443–2764 or e-mail National Institutes of Health (or the DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
Sherry.Whipple@hrsa.hhs.gov. designees of such officials) serve as non- HUMAN SERVICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As voting ex officio members.
Specifically, HRSA is requesting National Institutes of Health
provided by 42 CFR 121.12 (64 FR
56661), the Secretary established the nominations for up to 13 voting Notice of Meeting; Interagency Autism
Advisory Committee on Organ members of the ACOT representing: Coordinating Committee
Transplantation. The Committee is Thoracic transplant surgery, thoracic
governed by the Federal Advisory transplant medicine (physicians), liver The National Institutes of Health
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), transplant surgery, pediatrics, ethics, (NIH) hereby announces a meeting of
which sets forth standards for the organ procurement organizations, the Interagency Autism Coordinating
formation and use of advisory transplant candidates/recipients, and Committee to be held on May 16, 2005,
committees. transplant/donor family members. on the NIH campus in Bethesda,
The ACOT advises the Secretary, Nominees will be invited to serve a 4- Maryland.
acting through the Administrator, year term beginning approximately July The Children’s Health Act of 2000
HRSA, on all aspects of organ 27, 2005, and ending July 26, 2009. (Pub. L. 106–310), Title I, Section 104,
procurement, allocation, and mandated the establishment of an
HHS will consider nominations of all
transplantation, and on other such Interagency Autism Coordinating
qualified individuals with a view to
matters that the Secretary determines. Committee (IACC) to coordinate autism
ensuring that the Advisory Committee
One of its principal functions shall be research and other efforts within the
includes the areas of subject matter
to advise the Secretary on ways to Department of Health and Human
expertise noted above. Individuals may
maximize Federal efforts to increase Services (HHS). In April 2001, the HHS
nominate themselves or other
living and deceased organ donation Secretary delegated the authority to
individuals, and professional
nationally. Matters that may be establish the IACC to the NIH. Within
associations and organizations may
reviewed by the ACOT include the the NIH, the National Institute of Mental
nominate one or more qualified persons
following: Health (NIMH) is the designated lead for
for membership on the ACOT.
• Proposed enforceable OPTN this activity.
Nominations shall state that the The IACC meeting will be open to the
policies submitted for Secretarial nominee is willing to serve as a member
approval; public, with attendance limited to space
of the ACOT and appears to have no available. Individuals who plan to
• Organ allocation policies of the conflict of interest that would preclude
OPTN; attend and need special assistance, such
the ACOT membership. Potential as sign language interpretation or other
• The OPTN’s system of collecting, candidates will be asked to provide
disseminating and ensuring the validity, reasonable accommodations, should
detailed information concerning notify the contact person listed below in
accuracy, timeliness and usefulness of financial interests, consultancies,
data; advance of the meeting.
research grants, and/or contracts that
• The current state of knowledge might be affected by recommendations Name of Committee: Interagency Autism
regarding transplantation; and of the Committee to permit evaluation of Coordinating Committee.
• Additional medical, public health, possible sources of conflicts of interest.
Date: May 16, 2005.
ethical, legal, coverage and financing Time: 9 a.m.–4:30 p.m.
issues and socioeconomic issues A nomination package should include Agenda: Discussion of autism activities
the following information for each across Federal agencies.
relevant to transplantation. Place: National Institutes of Health, 31
The ACOT consists of up to 25 nominee: (1) A letter of nomination
stating the name, affiliation, and contact Center Drive, Building 31, Conference Room
members, including the Chair. Members 10 (6th floor), Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
and Chair shall be selected by the information for the nominee, the basis Contact Person: Ann Wagner, PhD,
Secretary from individuals for the nomination (i.e., what specific Division of Services and Intervention
knowledgeable in such fields as organ attributes recommend him/her for Research, NIMH, NIH, 6001 Executive
donation, health care public policy, service in this capacity), and the Boulevard, Room 7142, MSC 9633, Bethesda,
transplantation medicine and surgery, nominee’s field(s) of expertise; (2) a Maryland 20892, E-mail:
biographical sketch of the nominee and awagner@mail.nih.gov, Phone: 301–443–
critical care medicine and other medical
a copy of his/her curriculum vitae; and 4283.
specialties involved in the identification Any member of the public interested in
and referral of donors, non-physician (3) the name, return address, and
presenting oral comments to the Committee
transplant professions, nursing, daytime telephone number at which the may notify Dr. Wagner, as listed above, at
epidemiology, immunology, law and nominator can be contacted. least 5 days in advance of the meeting.
bioethics, behavioral sciences, The Department of Health and Human Interested individuals and representatives of
economics and statistics, as well as Services has special interest in assuring organizations may submit a letter of intent,
representatives of transplant candidates, that women, minority groups, and the a brief description of the organization
transplant recipients, organ donors, and physically disabled are adequately represented, and a short description of the
oral presentation. Presentations may be
family members. To the extent represented on advisory committees; limited to 5 minutes; we request both printed
practicable, Committee members should and therefore, extends particular and electronic copies for the record. In
represent the minority, gender and encouragement to nominations for addition, any interested person may file
geographic diversity of transplant appropriately qualified female, written comments with the Committee by
candidates, transplant recipients, organ minority, or disabled candidates. forwarding his or her statement to Dr.

VerDate jul<14>2003 19:07 Mar 03, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04MRN1.SGM 04MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 42 / Friday, March 4, 2005 / Notices 10659

Wagner, as listed above. The statement of the burden of the proposed collection information on the: project context,
should include the name, address, telephone of information; (c) ways to enhance the target population, engagement activities,
number, and, when applicable, the business quality, utility, and clarity of the housing, service delivery model,
or professional affiliation of the interested information to be collected; and (d) staffing, service integration, systems
person.
Information about the meeting and online
ways to minimize the burden of the integration, and community planning.
registration forms are also available on the collection of information on Data collection will be conducted
NIMH homepage at http:// respondents, including through the use over a 36-month period. At each project
www.nimh.nih.gov/autismiacc/index.cfm. of automated collection techniques or site a series of measures will be used to
Dated: February 23, 2005.
other forms of information technology. assess: (1) How chronically homeless
clients are assisted in obtaining
Raynard S. Kington, Proposed Project: Cross-Site Process
permanent housing and supportive
Deputy Director, National Institutes of Health. Evaluation of the Collaborative
services, (2) how clients are maintained
[FR Doc. 05–4171 Filed 3–3–05; 8:45 am] Initiative To Help End Chronic
in permanent housing and supportive
Homelessness—New
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P services, (3) how the project affects
The Substance Abuse and Mental client quality of life, (4) how the project
Health Services Administration’s expands or enhances the existing
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND (SAMHSA), Center for Mental Health service system in the short-term and
HUMAN SERVICES Services (CMHS) and Center for long-term, (5) how the project extends
Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) will its reach to beyond the original number
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
fund an evaluation of the Collaborative of clients and project funding, (6) how
Services Administration
Initiative to End Chronic Homelessness the project develops structures to
Agency Information Collection (CHI). The CHI is assisting sustain itself after grant funding ends,
Activities: Proposed Collection; unaccompanied homeless individuals and (7) how the project influences local
Comment Request with a disabling condition who have policy related to homelessness.
been continuously homeless for one Data collection instruments are semi-
In compliance with Section year or had at least four episodes of structured and will be administered by
3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork homelessness in the past three years to trained evaluation staff. Annual
Reduction Act of 1995 concerning achieve permanent housing and make interviews will be conducted with key
opportunity for public comment on use of supportive services. Within informants associated with the projects
proposed collections of information, the SAMHSA, CMHS will be the lead through annual visits to project sites
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Center. and telephone interviews. Focus groups
Services Administration will publish This evaluation will monitor and with project consumers will be
periodic summaries of proposed describe the implementation and conducted during annual visits. One-
projects. To request more information progress of the 11 local projects of the page activity checklists will be required
on the proposed projects or to obtain a Initiative. A cross-site process every other month from a random
copy of the information collection evaluation is needed to assure a high sample of project staff (staff may be
plans, call the SAMHSA Reports level of accountability and to describe randomly selected more than once each
Clearance Officer on (240) 276–1243. and analyze the critical elements of the year). Project documentation from
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether projects that influence the clients, the project advisory and managerial groups
the proposed collections of information services, and the system outcomes, (e.g., meeting minutes) will be reviewed
are necessary for the proper using the same research methods for all for evidence of service system and
performance of the functions of the sites. SAMHSA will conduct an policy change.
agency, including whether the evaluation by including a site-by-site The estimated annual response
information shall have practical utility; description of critical project elements burden to collect this information is as
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate including qualitative descriptive follows:

Number of Responses/ Burden/ Annual burden


Instrument respondents respondent response (hrs) (hrs)

Project Coordinator Interview ............................................................ 11 1 1.5 17


Team Lead Interview ......................................................................... 11 1 2 22
Clinician Interview .............................................................................. 11 1 1 11
Case Manager Interview .................................................................... 33 1 2 66
Property Manager Interview .............................................................. 11 1 .5 6
Advisory Board Member Interview .................................................... 11 1 1.2 13
Partner Agency/subcontractor Interview ............................................ 33 1 1.2 40
Outside Stakeholder Interview ........................................................... 11 1 .75 8
Consumer Focus Group .................................................................... 66 1 1.5 99
Activity Checklist ** ............................................................................ 66 3 .5 99

Total Annual* .............................................................................. 264 ............................ ............................ 380


* Sums and averages are rounded up to nearest integer.
** These respondents are selected from the same staff as the interviews above (project coordinator, team lead, clinician, case manager).

VerDate jul<14>2003 19:07 Mar 03, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04MRN1.SGM 04MRN1

You might also like