Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By Harfah Masady.,NCC.,RN.
Overview
Medical transport of high-risk and critically ill newborns requires skilled personnel and specialized
equipment. Ideally, a neonatal transport team forms a single component associated with a larger
system of perinatal care composed of a tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), a perinatal
care unit, cadres of medical and surgical pediatric subspecialists, and a neonatal outreach program.
This article reviews the issues related to transport of the critically ill newborn population, including
personnel, medical control, equipment, policy development, and transport administration. (See the
image below.)
Vehicles for ground transport of pediatric and neonatal patients in the United States are usually
truck chassis-based and either large enough to transport a single patient, similar in size to most
ambulances (on the right), or larger units designed to transport several critically ill infants in
transport incubators (on the left). Note that children's hospital units often may use custom, childfriendly designs. Note that despite the color schemes, the units must have mandatory safety
features common to ambulances (eg, lights, lightbars, sirens, the "Star of Life," highly reflective
stripes).
A significant number of neonates require emergent transfer to a tertiary care center, often because of
medical, surgical, or rapidly emerging postpartum problems. These are termed outborn neonates,
because they have been born somewhere besides the facility to which theyve been transferred.
Studies show that shortened interfacility transport time leads to improved outcomes for the smallest
and most critically ill newborns. (Critically ill neonates who are born in the specialized center itself,
perhaps because of prenatal detection of a problem or because the referral center routinely delivers
care to at-risk perinatal populations, are termed "inborn" neonates.)
Because the outcome of an outborn neonate with major medical or surgical problems (including
extreme prematurity) remains worse than for an inborn infant, primary emphasis should always
remain on prenatal diagnosis and subsequent in-utero (ie, maternal) transfer whenever possible.
Despite advanced training and technology, mothers usually make the best transport incubators.
Development of neonatal transport, perinatal regionalization, and NICUs
The emergence of skills to care for ill or premature newborns can be linked to exhibits of premature
infant care at public expositions, such as the 1933 World's Fair in Chicago. These exhibits preceded
the emergence of NICUs and the transport of ill infants.
After establishment of centers to care for ill neonates, attention shifted to caring for infants who were
either born at home or in inadequately equipped centers. Transport of outborn neonates to specialty
centers initially used clever adaptations of incubators otherwise carried in an automobile. Butterfield
has written an excellent and personal review of these beginnings. [1]
The next evolution in transport developed from the lessons in aeromedical transport of the wounded in
World War II, Korea, and Vietnam. The need for rapid evacuation of trauma patients from the scene of
accidents led to the development of a system of trauma centers and aeromedical transport services.
In 1976, the Committee on Perinatal Health, sponsored by the March of Dimes, proposed a system for
regionalized perinatal care and defined three levels of hospital care, which served throughout the
1970s and 1980s as a national model for the rapid development of neonatal referral centers. [2] This
model required the development of a neonatal transport system, which was associated with a
significant reduction in the US neonatal mortality rate.
Because neonatal transport was required for NICU referral centers, and because pediatric transports
to pediatric ICUs (PICUs) were increasing, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) formed a Task
Force on Interhospital Transport and subsequently developed guidelines. [3]
The appearance of various commercial products for the care of neonatal patients in the transport
environment paralleled the proliferation of neonatal transport programs.
Medical director
The neonatal transport team medical director, who should be a licensed physician and familiar with air
and ground emergency medical services, supervises and evaluates the quality of medical care.
Ideally, this physician is a board-certified subspecialist in neonatal/perinatal medicine, pediatric
intensive care, or both. However, as an alternative, an adult-oriented medical director of a transport
team may use subspecialty physicians as consultants.
The medical director should be actively involved in (1) the selection of appropriate personnel, (2)
continuing team education and training, (3) the development and review of policies, (4) the quality
management program, and (5) the selection, orientation, and supervision of medical control
physicians.
Communications
To initiate the transport process, a mechanism is needed for immediately contacting the appropriate
medical control physician upon receiving a transport request. The medical control physician decides
whether transfer is appropriate, discusses stabilization issues with the referring physician, and, if
indicated, authorizes or recommends a mode of transport. Additional communication occurs between
referring physicians, accepting physicians, medical control physicians, transport team members, and
pilots or drivers.
Ideally, a dedicated communications center operates 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to allow for
constant communication during the triage process and transport. A dedicated communications center
is especially valuable for rotor-wing aircraft transport or for teams with multiple ground units.
Several viable models are available for communications; to increase efficiency, the trend is to share
resources via consolidated communications centers. An alternative method of initial contact is for the
referring physicians to call the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) directly and have the unit personnel
place them in contact with the appropriate transport team medical control physician. This mechanism
of routing communications is more commonly used by smaller centers and transport teams.
Medical transport systems appropriately focus on rapid arrival of the transport team and medical
direction of the team upon arrival at bedside. However, prior to the arrival of the transport team,
medical direction and advice to the stabilizing personnel at the referring hospital may be invaluable.
Upon being informed of a transfer request, the medical control physician is put in contact with the
referring physician to discuss the case. Such discussion is essential to allow for adequate preparation
of the accepting hospital and transport team and to provide direction on pretransport stabilization prior
to the arrival of the transport team. Communication of vital signs, laboratory values, and previous
therapies allows for effective comanagement of the patient.
Intravenous access
Nearly all ill neonates require peripheral or central intravascular access during transport. The team
must have the necessary equipment and skills for routinely and reliably securing intravenous (IV)
access in these tiny and challenging patients.
Advanced procedures
Staff competency also ideally includes training in other unusual invasive procedures, such as
percutaneous needle aspiration of the chest, chest tube insertion, umbilical catheter insertion, and
intraosseous vascular access.
Table 1. Advantages and Disadvantages of Potential Transport Team Staff Relative to Neonatal
Transport Skills and Abilities (Open Table in a new window)
Availability
Versatility
Costs
Paramedic (EMT-P)
Good
Lower
Fair
Low
Low
Nurse (RN)
Good
Fair
Low
Fair
High
Good
Fair
Excellent
Good
Moderate
Low
Good
Good
High
High
Fair
Good
Variable
Good
Moderate
Low
Excellent
Variable
High
Very high
Cross-training issues
Often, the critically ill neonatal patient cannot be adequately stabilized and managed in an outlying
referring hospital, leading to time pressures in arranging for transport team arrival. One possible
alternative to long delays and increasing costs is to use seasoned, cross-trained personnel, including
cross-trained NICU personnel, to perform transports. The feasibility of this alternative is dependent on
adequate planning and training and a carefully defined triage mechanism. Because personnel crosstraining necessitates more training, demands should be carefully evaluated.
Mode of Transport
Ground ambulance
This mode of transport is used for relatively short-distance transport (up to 25 miles) when surface
transportation is more efficient and often more rapid than air transport. It must also be used when
climactic conditions preclude air transport (see Table 2, below). Advantages include the following (see
the images below):
Lowest transport costs
Transport vehicles may be equipped as a specialty vehicle exclusively for pediatric and/or
neonatal patients
Ground units may be equipped to simultaneously transport 2 patients in the event of twin or
higher-order multiple transport requests
Comparatively
roomy
interior
space
allowing
for
improved
patient
access
This transportation mode (see the image below) may be used for medium-distance transfers (up to
150 miles). Advantages include the following (see Table 2, below):
Rapid departure and arrival of the team to the patient, decreased out-of-hospital time space
Interior of a rotor-wing aircraft (helicopter) configured for neonatal transport. A flight incubator and 2 crew
members are on board. The aircraft is an MBB (Messerschmidt-Bolkow Blohn) Model BK-117A4 manufactured
by American Eurocopter (Grand Prairie, Texas), reconfigured and operated by Omniflight (Dallas, Texas). Note
the limited access to the incubator and equipment that highly restricts crew movements.
Higher costs
Compromised patient assessment and/or interventions during flight due to high environmental
noise and vibration levels
Restricted patient access during flight
space allowed for patient transport is adequate Interior of a fixed-wing aircraft configured for
neonatal transport. A flight incubator and 2 crew members are on board. The aircraft is a King Air Model 200
(Raytheon-Beech Aircraft, Witchita, Kansas). Note that interior space is adequate.
Disadvantages include the following:
Rotor-wing Aircraft
Fixed-wing Aircraft
Departure times
Excellent
Excellent
Poor to fair
Arrival times
Fair to poor
Excellent
Good
Out-of-hospital time
Poor
Excellent
Fair to excellent
Patient accessibility
Good
Poor
Fair
Weather issues
Excellent
Poor
Fair to good
Cost
Low
High
High
Predeparture Stabilization
Method 1
The transport team assumes patient care and rapidly loads the neonatal patient for transport, thereby
reducing out-of-hospital time and maximizing access to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)
management. For neonates with rapidly progressing disease processes, this reduces the potential for
progression of the disease prior to arrival.
Method 1 is more often used with less-experienced team personnel, with rotor-wing transfer, or both.
This approach leads to shorter out-of-hospital intervals. The addition of several low-level
interventions, such as peripheral intravenous insertion, nasogastric tube insertion, oxygen
administration, or Foley catheter insertion, does not generally add significant delay to the time of
stabilization. This transport model is similar to the model typically used in trauma calls, affectionately
known as "swoop and scoop."
Method 2
The neonate is maximally stabilized prior to departure from the referring hospital. This minimizes the
need for interventions en route to the NICU in the relatively uncontrolled transport environment but
results in longer stabilization times and may lead to more time for disease progression. The
performance of high-level interventions, such as intubation, arterial cannulation, central venous
cannulation, or chest tube insertion, will lead to markedly prolonged stabilization times. Method 2 is
used more often with transport teams that incorporate physicians or highly skilled physician extenders
and/or with longer ground or fixed-wing transports.[6]
Combination method
Each neonatal patient undergoes a careful assessment (eg, vital signs), a rapid blood glucose
determination, and establishment of IV access. Because respiratory distress is such a frequent
problem with a large proportion of critically ill neonates, special effort should be paid to assessing the
airway and the competence of oxygenation and ventilation.
Following this initial, rapid assessment, most neonates who are not stable or are deteriorating rapidly
are stabilized quickly and then expediently transferred. Alternatively, some clinical situations require
more extensive and immediate interventions in the field, including artificial surfactant administration
for extreme respiratory failure, and evacuation of a pneumothorax, among others.
transported for HIE. Of those patients, 23 required additional active cooling by the transport team. Of
the actively cooled infants, 5 had core temperatures of less than 30C; thus, caution is indicated. No
clinical data have documented the effectiveness of these techniques in eventual neurodevelopmental
outcomes.
One study found reduced morbidity and mortality resulting from therapeutic whole-body hypothermia
in newborns with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy who required retrieval and transport to a regional
NICU. Newborns of 35 weeks' gestation or more who received this treatment within 6 hours of birth
realized a decreased mortality rate and an increased survival rate free of sensorineural disability at 2
years, with minimal adverse effects.[9]
Monitoring issues
Routine NICU care involves patient monitoring with cardiorespiratory monitors that use adhesive
chest leads and pulse oximetry monitors that use pulse-detecting extremity probes. Continuous
monitoring of blood pressure requires the use of transducers that are in line with indwelling central
lines (eg, umbilical catheters). The increased vibration and electromechanical interference associated
with the transport environment frequently interferes with or precludes such monitoring.
The premature neonate's small size and small signals complicate electronic interference issues.
These interference problems are greatest during aircraft takeoff and landing. At these times, the crew
may be distracted by required flight protocols, are restrained for safety reasons, and may be unable to
accurately assess the patient. The highest probability of monitoring failure, therefore, occurs during
the periods when the patient is most likely to become destabilized and require intervention.
Flight physiology
Increasing altitude affects physiology in a number of ways; this includes causing decreased partial
pressure of gasses, expansion of trapped gas compartments (eg, pneumothorax), lowered
environmental temperatures, and altered drug metabolism. Flight crew members and medical control
physicians must be familiar with these concepts.
Flight team personnel are also affected by the transport environment and need to be familiar with how
their own performances are altered. For example, if a flight team member with a head cold and upper
airway congestion experiences a sinus squeeze upon takeoff, they need to recognize and deal with
this phenomenon quickly so that patient care and team safety are not compromised.
baby syndrome. In this example, the discrepancy in drug metabolism is due to decreased and altered
hepatic elimination.
For hepatically eliminated drugs, the neonate may have either a reduced or absent capacity for
certain enzymatic degradation pathways. Thus, a drug that is metabolized by one enzymatic pathway
in adults (eg, glucuronidation) may be metabolized in infants via a completely different pathway (eg,
sulfation); this can result in unpredictable drug metabolism. The enzymatic processes progressively
develop in the fetal liver, with more complex enzymatic processes requiring more gestational
development (ontogeny of development).
One should use caution when administering drugs excreted by the kidney, because the neonate,
especially the premature and/or critically ill infant, initially has a decreased glomerular filtration rate
and generally has decreased renal function. Prolonged dosing intervals are often used for
medications with renal excretion, and serum drug levels are often required.
Quality Assurance
Quality management program
In addition to patient care issues, a quality management program assesses all other aspects of the
transport program as well. This includes continuous monitoring and assessment of communications,
initial and continuing education, maintenance of required licensure and certifications, ambulance and
aircraft maintenance, and operational issues, especially safety.
Quality management should be deeply imbedded into the program by beginning with a program
scope-of-care and mission statement. Hospital administration should guide the process with the
involvement of the transport staff and the medical director.
Transport programs should have established patient care guidelines that are reviewed on an annual
basis by the staff, management, and medical director. There should be prospective agreement on the
applicable quality indicators. Industry guidelines for standards of operation and standards of care,
such as those issued by the Association of Air Medical Services (AAMS) [10] and the Commission on
Accreditation of Medical Transport Systems (CAMTS),[4] are available and should be used.
For many other issues, however, the team should decide on the indicators (objective measures that
are prospectively delineated and collected for analysis) and thresholds (statistical measure of
compliance on the specific indicator) for acceptable outcome or compliance. Thresholds must be
attainable, realistic goals for assessing compliance and quantifying improvement.
An annual review needs to be made of the quality assurance process itself. Involving the staff in a
peer review process increases the success of a quality assurance program.
Data collection
Data collection provides important information that is used in previously described quality assurance
functions. The transport team often takes on the task of data collection so that it functions as a
component of a larger system of perinatal care.
Transport data are monitored to provide hospital- or physician-specific topics for review by perinatal
outreach programs. Referring practitioners are interested in hearing discussions on issues they
perceive to be timely. Discussing recent cases and situations in their institutions is effective in
outreach and continuing education efforts.
Data collection increases the efficiency of a transport service. Monitoring the hour of transport
requests, length of transport time, length of time at bedside, incidence of delayed calls, and incidence
of overtime is useful in altering schedules or timing of elective reverse transports.
Finally, data collection should be increasingly used for clinical or outcomes research. Published data
on neonatal transport issues and outcomes is surprisingly limited. However, the Canadian Neonatal
Network published their experience in abstract form from 2006-2007 on the transport of 2,313 infants
with estimated gestational age of less than 32 weeks from outlying centers to 25 Canadian regional
neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).[11] Using the Transport Risk Index of Physiologic Stability
(TRIPS) score, they documented that 49.4% of transported neonates had increased scores (clinical
deterioration) during transport. Significant variables in this analysis included the following:
Distance travelled
Team composition
Gender
Is the proposed accepting hospital capable of providing the care required by the recovering
neonate
Can the predictable future needs of the infant be met by the institution (eg, subspecialty
medical or surgical consultations)
Has permission been granted by the parent(s) for the infant to be transported
Does the estimated remaining length of stay balance the costs and risks of reverse transport
Have any social factors that may affect the choice of convalescing hospital been identified
Has the third-party payor (e.g., insurance company) approved the transfer
Will the costs of the transport and subsequent hospitalization be approved by the payor
and/or will the costs be acceptable to the parents
Do the physicians and hospitals at both facilities agree that the transfer is in the baby's and
family's best interests
Will the ultimate follow-up physician provide care at the receiving hospital, thereby facilitating
continuity of care
Are adequate level I and II nursery personnel available who are sufficiently experienced in
caring for the infant population
Has a well-functioning working relationship been noted between the tertiary and level I and II
hospitals relative to physicians, staff, and administration
What motivates the level I and II hospitals to participate in the perinatal system as full
partners rather than to be resigned to a role such as "patient donors" or competitors to the tertiary
hospital
These considerations reduce costs and maintain the availability of the primary team for incoming
calls.