You are on page 1of 18

CT8: CMP Upgrade 2014/15

Page 1

Subject CT8
CMP Upgrade 2014/15
CMP Upgrade
This CMP Upgrade lists all significant changes to the Core Reading and the ActEd
material since last year so that you can manually amend your 2014 study material to
make it suitable for study for the 2015 exams. It includes replacement pages and
additional pages where appropriate.
Alternatively, you can buy a full replacement set of up-to-date Course Notes at a
significantly reduced price if you have previously bought the full price Course Notes in
this subject. Please see our 2015 Student Brochure for more details.

This CMP Upgrade contains:

all changes to the Syllabus objectives and Core Reading

changes to the ActEd Course Notes, Series X Assignments and Question and
Answer Bank that will make them suitable for study for the 2015 exams.

The Actuarial Education Company

IFE: 2015 Examinations

Page 2

CT8: CMP Upgrade 2013/14

Changes to the Syllabus Objectives and Core Reading

1.1

Syllabus Objectives
No changes have been made to the syllabus objectives.

1.2

Core Reading
No changes have been made to the Core Reading.

IFE: 2015 Examinations

The Actuarial Education Company

CT8: CMP Upgrade 2014/15

Page 3

Changes to the ActEd Course Notes


Chapter 13
Page 24
The second sentence in the section headed Step 2: Starting at State (1,2) has been
corrected to say:
Starting from State (1,2), the possible derivative payoffs at time 2 are c2 (1) = 0 and
c2 (2) = 0 .

The Actuarial Education Company

IFE: 2015 Examinations

Page 4

CT8: CMP Upgrade 2013/14

Changes to the Q&A Bank


Q&A Part 1
Question 1.5
The bullet points at the end of the solution to part (ii) have been rephrased as follows to
make them clearer.
Hence, as Colins wealth decreases the:

absolute amount of his investment in risky assets will increase (as his absolute
risk aversion decreases as his wealth decreases)
[1]

proportion of his wealth that is invested in risky assets will increase (as his
relative risk aversion decreases as his wealth decreases).
[1]

IFE: 2015 Examinations

The Actuarial Education Company

CT8: CMP Upgrade 2014/15

Page 5

Changes to the X assignments


Assignment X1
Question X1.7
In the middle of the solution to part (i), an extra % sign has been added to the E [ AB ]
term. So, the solution now says:

E [ A] = 6.0%

E [ B ] = 6.1%

E [ AB ] = 19%%

[1]

Assignment X2
Question X2.5

The wording in (i) has been changed to the following:


Explain why, in economic terms, the value of the US Dollar is likely to increase
when rd > re .
The solution to the question is unchanged.
Question X2.6

The solution to part (i) has been changed to the following:


Standard Brownian motion is a continuous-time stochastic process with state space R .
[]
It has:

independent increments

[]

stationary increments

[]

continuous sample paths.

[]

The distribution of the increments Bt - Bs ( 0 s < t ) is given by:


Bt - Bs ~ N (0, t - s)

The Actuarial Education Company

[]

IFE: 2015 Examinations

Page 6

CT8: CMP Upgrade 2013/14

B0 = 0 .

[]
[Total 3]

QuestionX2.7

The wording to part (iii)(a) has been changed to make it clearer what is required. It
now says:
Explain whether the longitudinal and cross-sectional properties will be the same or
different for the following two data sets:
(a)

the monthly share prices

(b)

the log returns over the next month.

The solution to the question is unchanged.

Assignment X3

Question X3.5

The wording in part (i) has been changed and now says Explain what is meant by a
replicating portfolio. The solution is unchanged.

Question X3.9

The first phrase in the solution to part (iv) has been edited and now simply says We
can use put-call parity:.

IFE: 2015 Examinations

The Actuarial Education Company

CT8: CMP Upgrade 2014/15

Page 7

Assignment X4

Question 4.2

Part (i) of this question has been expanded a little and is now as follows.
The price of a non-dividend-paying stock at time 1, S1 , is related to the price at time 0,
S0 , as follows:
S1 = S0u with probability p and
S0 d with probability 1 - p .
The continuously compounded rate of return on a risk-free asset is r.
(i)

(a)

Determine the replicating portfolio for a European call option written on


the stock that expires at time 1 and has a strike price of k, where
dS0 < k < uS0 . You should give expressions for the number of units for
each constituent in the portfolio.

(b)

Use your expressions in (i)(a) to find a formula for the price of the
European call option.

(c)

Use put-call parity to derive a formula for the price of the corresponding
European put option, with the same strike price and strike date.

(d)

Show that the price of the European call option in (i)(b) can be written as
the discounted expected payoff under a probability measure Q. Hence
find an expression for the probability, q, of an upward move in the stock
price under Q.
[7]

Part (ii) of the question is unchanged. The revised solution to part (i) is as follows.
(i)(a) Replicating portfolio of European call option
We have two possibilities for the price at time 1:
S0 u
S1 =
S0 d

if the price goes up


if the price goes down

The Actuarial Education Company

IFE: 2015 Examinations

Page 8

CT8: CMP Upgrade 2013/14

We can hold an amount f of the stock, and amount y of cash at time 0 with the
intention of replicating a derivative whose payoff at time 1 is cu if the stock price goes
up and cd if the stock price goes down.
We equate the value of the portfolio at time 1 with the payoffs on the call option at
time 1 and solve the simultaneous equations:

f S0u +y er = cu
f S0 d +y er = cd
cd u - cu d
u - d

y = e- r

giving

and

cu cd
S0 (u d )

[1]

[]

[]

By the no-arbitrage principle, the value of this portfolio at time 0, V0 , must also be the
value of the derivative contract at that time.
Finally, we are actually asked to replicate a European call with strike price of k. This
implies that cu = uS0 - k and cd = 0 since we are told that dS0 < k < uS0 . Substituting
in our expressions for f and y gives:

f=
and

S 0u - k
S0 (u - d )
- ( S 0u - k ) d
S u-k
= -e - r 0
d

u - d
u-d

y = e- r

[]
[]
[Total 3]

Note that we could have alternatively worked with the explicit expressions for the payoff
from the start. In this question it wouldnt have really mattered; perhaps the maths is
slightly easier just dealing specifically with the call option, although at least with cu
and cd you get answers that should be familiar from Core Reading. In addition, if the
question had asked later for the corresponding expressions for a put, then the method
presented here would have saved you a considerable amount of time. It often pays to
read all the parts of a question before starting it.

IFE: 2015 Examinations

The Actuarial Education Company

CT8: CMP Upgrade 2014/15

Page 9

(i)(b) Price of European call option


By the no-arbitrage principle, the price of the European call option is given by:
V0 = f S0 + y

[]

Substituting the expressions for f and y from (i)(a) into this gives:
V0 = S0 + =

er d
( S u k ) d r
S 0u k
S0 e r 0

= e ( S0u k )
S0 (u d )
ud
ud

[1]

[Total 1]
(i)(c) Price of European put option using put-call parity
Put-call parity says that for European calls and puts with the same strike price and date:
p0 + S0 = c0 + ke - r

[]

So:
p0 = c0 + ke - r - S0
er - d
= e - r ( S0 u - k )
+ ke - r - S0

u-d
=

ie

e- r
S0 ue r - S0 ud - ke r + kd + ku - kd - S0 ue r + S0 de r

u - d

=e

-r

er - u
( S0 d - k ) u - d

[1]
[Total 1]

(i)(d) Price of European call under risk-neutral measure Q


As in part (i(a)) we could work with the general case using cu and cd but its quicker
to use the explicit expressions because cd = 0 simplifies matters.

We want to show that:

V0 = f S0 +y = e - r EQ (C | F0 ) = e - r q ( S0u - k )

The Actuarial Education Company

IFE: 2015 Examinations

Page 10

CT8: CMP Upgrade 2013/14

where C is the call option payoff at time 1 and q is the required (risk-neutral)
probability of an upward stock price movement.
[]
Now, comparing the pricing formula for the call option in (i)(b) to:

e - r EQ (C ) = e - r q ( S0u - k )

gives us:

q=

er - d
u-d

[]
[Total 1]

A new question has been added on the Merton model as follows. (Note that all of the
existing questions are still relevant.)
Question

An analyst is using the Merton model, together with the following information, to value
the five-year zero-coupon bonds (ZCBs) issued by a company:

The nominal value of ZCBs issued is $100 million.

The companys shares have a market capitalisation of $118.46 million.

The volatility of the companys underlying assets has been estimated to be


25% pa.

The five-year risk-free force of interest is 5% pa.

(i)

Calculate the price per $100 nominal of a five-year risk-free ZCB.

(ii)

Using your answer to (i) to obtain an initial estimate, and then applying linear
interpolation, estimate the value of the companys assets (to the nearest $10,000)
and hence show that the value of its ZCBs is $76.47 million.
[5]

(iii)

(a)

State the formula for the delta of a European call option based on the
Black-Scholes formula (assuming no dividends) and use it to derive a
formula for the delta of the ZCBs with respect to the value of the
companys assets.

(b)

Estimate the numerical value of delta using your calculations in part (ii)
and use it to estimate the new value of the ZCBs following a $10 million
fall in the value of the companys assets.

IFE: 2015 Examinations

[1]

The Actuarial Education Company

CT8: CMP Upgrade 2014/15

(c)

Page 11

The actual value of the ZCBs following a $10 million fall in the value of
the companys assets is $76.16 million. Give a possible reason for the
discrepancy between your estimated value of the ZCBs and the actual
value.
[5]
[Total 11]

Solution

(i)

Price of risk-free zero-coupon bond

Price = 100 e -50.05 = $77.88


(ii)

[1]

Value of companys assets and ZCBs

Adding together the value of the company shares and the risk-free ZCBs gives a starting
value for the value of its assets of:

Ft = 118.46 + 77.88 = $196.34m

[]

Recall the Merton model for the current value of the shares:
Et = Ft F( d1 ) - L e - r (T -t ) F(d 2 ) ,

where d1 =

F
log t + r + s 2 (T - t )
L

s T -t

, d 2 = d1 - s T - t

[]

So, substituting the starting value of 196.34 for Ft into this formula, together with:

the outstanding term of the ZCBs, T - t = 5


the volatility of the companys assets, s F = 0.25

the risk-free force of interest, r = 0.05


the nominal value of the ZCBs, L = 100

gives:

d1 =

196.34
log
+ 0.05 + 0.252 5

100
0.25 5

The Actuarial Education Company

= 1.9336

[]

IFE: 2015 Examinations

Page 12

CT8: CMP Upgrade 2013/14

d 2 = 1.9336 - 0.25 5 = 1.3746

[]

and hence:
Et = 196.34 F(1.9336) - 100 e -0.055 F(1.3746) = $119.832m

0.97342

[]

0.91537

This is (about 1.37) greater than the observed market capitalisation and delta (the
change in the share price with respect to the total asset value) is positive. So, try a
lower estimate for the total asset value.
[]
Note also that as the option represented by the shares is very in-the-money (as Ft is
much greater than L = 100 ), delta is close to one.
So, in order to reduce the market capitalisation by about 1.37, we need to try a value of
Ft a bit more than 1.37 less than 196.34. So, we next try Ft = 194.90 . This gives:

d1 =

194.90
log
+ 0.05 + 0.252 5
100
0.25 5

= 1.9205

d 2 = 1.9205 - 0.25 5 = 1.3614


and hence:
Et = 194.90 F(1.9205) - 100 e -0.055 F(1.3614) = $118.431m

0.97260

0.91331

This is just below the market capitalisation of $118.46 (and delta is close to one), so
lets try an asset value that is slightly higher, eg Ft = 194.95 . This gives:

d1 =

194.95
log
+ 0.05 + 0.252 5
100
0.25 5

= 1.9209

d 2 = 1.9209 - 0.25 5 = 1.3619

IFE: 2015 Examinations

The Actuarial Education Company

CT8: CMP Upgrade 2014/15

Page 13

and hence:
Et = 194.95 F(1.9209) - 100 e -0.055 F(1.3619) = $118.479m

0.97263

0.91338

Finally, linear interpolation between 194.90 and 194.95 gives:

Ft = 194.90 + 0.05

118.46 - 118.431
= $194.93m
118.479 - 118.431
[2 for correct Ft via appropriate interpolation]

Alternatively, trying Ft = 195.00 gives:

d1 =

195.00
log
+ 0.05 + 0.252 5

100
0.25 5

= 1.9214

d 2 = 1.9214 - 0.25 5 = 1.3624


and hence:
Et = 195.00 F(1.9214) - 100 e -0.055 F(1.3624) = $118.528m

0.97266

0.91346

So, linear interpolation between 194.90 and 195.00 gives:

Ft = 194.90 + 0.10

118.46 - 118.431
= $194.93m
118.528 - 118.431
[2 for correct Ft via appropriate interpolation]

Hence, the value of the companys ZCBs must be:


Bt = 194.93 - 118.46 = $76.47m

[]
[Maximum 5]

(iii)(a) Delta of the ZCBs


If the underlying asset pays no dividends then, according to the Black-Scholes formula:
D call = F(d1 )

The Actuarial Education Company

[]

IFE: 2015 Examinations

Page 14

CT8: CMP Upgrade 2013/14

In the Merton model:


Ft = Et + Bt

[]

Differentiating this equation partially with respect to Ft gives:


1 = DE + DB
ie

DB = 1 - DE

[]

So, recalling that the Merton model suggests that the companys shares are effectively a
European call option on its underlying assets, we have:
D B = 1 - F(d1 )

[]
[Total 2]

(iii)(b) Numerical value of delta


D B = 1 - F(d1 )
So, using F(d1 ) 0.97262 from part (ii) we have:
D B = 1 - 0.97262 = 0.02738

[]

Markers: Please accept any value for D B between:


D B = 1 - 0.9726 = 0.0274
and

D B = 1 - 0.9727 = 0.0273

Estimated fall in the value of the ZCBs

If the value of the companys assets falls by $10 million, the value of the ZCBs will
therefore fall by approximately:
10 D B = 10 0.02738 = $0.2738m

[1]

Bt' = 76.47 - 0.2738 = $76.196m

[]

to:

[Total 2]

IFE: 2015 Examinations

The Actuarial Education Company

CT8: CMP Upgrade 2014/15

Page 15

(iii)(c) Reason for discrepancy between estimate and actual value


The difference between the estimated value and the actual value stems from the fact that
delta is not constant but varies with the change in the value of the companys assets. [1]
In other words, the difference arises because gamma is non-zero.
Alternatively, the values may differ because the values of one or more of the other
parameters (eg the volatility) may have changed.
[1]
[Maximum 1]
In fact, partially differentiating the formula for delta gives:

GB =

2 Ft
Et2

=-

f (d1 )
<0
Fts T - t

which tells us that delta decreases as the value of the companys assets increases and
conversely that it increases with a fall in the value of the companys assets. So, in this
instance, assuming delta is constant means that the fall in the value of the ZCBs is
under-estimated. Hence, the estimated ZCB value is greater than the actual value.

The Actuarial Education Company

IFE: 2015 Examinations

Page 16

CT8: CMP Upgrade 2013/14

Other tuition services


In addition to this CMP Upgrade you might find the following helpful with your study.

5.1

Study material
We offer the following study material in Subject CT8:

Online Classroom

Flashcards

Sound Revision

Revision Notes

ASET (ActEd Solutions with Exam Technique) and Mini-ASET

Mock Exam

Additional Mock Pack.

For further details on ActEds study materials, please refer to the 2014 Student
Brochure, which is available from the ActEd website at www.ActEd.co.uk.

5.2

Tutorials
We offer the following tutorials in Subject CT8:

a set of Regular Tutorials (lasting two or three full days)

a Block Tutorial (lasting two or three full days)

a Revision Tutorial (lasting one full day)

Live Online Tutorials (lasting three full days)

Live Online Revision Tutorials (lasting half a day or a whole day).

For further details on ActEds tutorials, please refer to our latest Tuition Bulletin, which
is available from the ActEd website at www.ActEd.co.uk.

IFE: 2015 Examinations

The Actuarial Education Company

CT8: CMP Upgrade 2014/15

5.3

Page 17

Marking
You can have your attempts at any of our assignments or mock exams marked by
ActEd. When marking your scripts, we aim to provide specific advice to improve your
chances of success in the exam and to return your scripts as quickly as possible.
For further details on ActEds marking services, please refer to the 2015 Student
Brochure, which is available from the ActEd website at www.ActEd.co.uk.

5.4

Feedback on the study material


ActEd is always pleased to get feedback from students about any aspect of our study
programmes. Please let us know if you have any specific comments (eg about certain
sections of the notes or particular questions) or general suggestions about how we can
improve the study material. We will incorporate as many of your suggestions as we can
when we update the course material each year.
If you have any comments on this course please send them by email to CT8@bpp.com
or by fax to 01235 550085.

The Actuarial Education Company

IFE: 2015 Examinations

All study material produced by ActEd is copyright and is sold


for the exclusive use of the purchaser. The copyright is owned
by Institute and Faculty Education Limited, a subsidiary of
the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries.
Unless prior authority is granted by ActEd, you may not hire
out, lend, give out, sell, store or transmit electronically or
photocopy any part of the study material.
You must take care of your study material to ensure that it is
not used or copied by anybody else.
Legal action will be taken if these terms are infringed. In
addition, we may seek to take disciplinary action through the
profession or through your employer.
These conditions remain in force after you have finished using
the course.

IFE: 2015 Examinations

The Actuarial Education Company

You might also like