Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Page 1
Subject CT8
CMP Upgrade 2014/15
CMP Upgrade
This CMP Upgrade lists all significant changes to the Core Reading and the ActEd
material since last year so that you can manually amend your 2014 study material to
make it suitable for study for the 2015 exams. It includes replacement pages and
additional pages where appropriate.
Alternatively, you can buy a full replacement set of up-to-date Course Notes at a
significantly reduced price if you have previously bought the full price Course Notes in
this subject. Please see our 2015 Student Brochure for more details.
changes to the ActEd Course Notes, Series X Assignments and Question and
Answer Bank that will make them suitable for study for the 2015 exams.
Page 2
1.1
Syllabus Objectives
No changes have been made to the syllabus objectives.
1.2
Core Reading
No changes have been made to the Core Reading.
Page 3
Page 4
absolute amount of his investment in risky assets will increase (as his absolute
risk aversion decreases as his wealth decreases)
[1]
proportion of his wealth that is invested in risky assets will increase (as his
relative risk aversion decreases as his wealth decreases).
[1]
Page 5
E [ A] = 6.0%
E [ B ] = 6.1%
E [ AB ] = 19%%
[1]
Assignment X2
Question X2.5
independent increments
[]
stationary increments
[]
[]
[]
Page 6
B0 = 0 .
[]
[Total 3]
QuestionX2.7
The wording to part (iii)(a) has been changed to make it clearer what is required. It
now says:
Explain whether the longitudinal and cross-sectional properties will be the same or
different for the following two data sets:
(a)
(b)
Assignment X3
Question X3.5
The wording in part (i) has been changed and now says Explain what is meant by a
replicating portfolio. The solution is unchanged.
Question X3.9
The first phrase in the solution to part (iv) has been edited and now simply says We
can use put-call parity:.
Page 7
Assignment X4
Question 4.2
Part (i) of this question has been expanded a little and is now as follows.
The price of a non-dividend-paying stock at time 1, S1 , is related to the price at time 0,
S0 , as follows:
S1 = S0u with probability p and
S0 d with probability 1 - p .
The continuously compounded rate of return on a risk-free asset is r.
(i)
(a)
(b)
Use your expressions in (i)(a) to find a formula for the price of the
European call option.
(c)
Use put-call parity to derive a formula for the price of the corresponding
European put option, with the same strike price and strike date.
(d)
Show that the price of the European call option in (i)(b) can be written as
the discounted expected payoff under a probability measure Q. Hence
find an expression for the probability, q, of an upward move in the stock
price under Q.
[7]
Part (ii) of the question is unchanged. The revised solution to part (i) is as follows.
(i)(a) Replicating portfolio of European call option
We have two possibilities for the price at time 1:
S0 u
S1 =
S0 d
Page 8
We can hold an amount f of the stock, and amount y of cash at time 0 with the
intention of replicating a derivative whose payoff at time 1 is cu if the stock price goes
up and cd if the stock price goes down.
We equate the value of the portfolio at time 1 with the payoffs on the call option at
time 1 and solve the simultaneous equations:
f S0u +y er = cu
f S0 d +y er = cd
cd u - cu d
u - d
y = e- r
giving
and
cu cd
S0 (u d )
[1]
[]
[]
By the no-arbitrage principle, the value of this portfolio at time 0, V0 , must also be the
value of the derivative contract at that time.
Finally, we are actually asked to replicate a European call with strike price of k. This
implies that cu = uS0 - k and cd = 0 since we are told that dS0 < k < uS0 . Substituting
in our expressions for f and y gives:
f=
and
S 0u - k
S0 (u - d )
- ( S 0u - k ) d
S u-k
= -e - r 0
d
u - d
u-d
y = e- r
[]
[]
[Total 3]
Note that we could have alternatively worked with the explicit expressions for the payoff
from the start. In this question it wouldnt have really mattered; perhaps the maths is
slightly easier just dealing specifically with the call option, although at least with cu
and cd you get answers that should be familiar from Core Reading. In addition, if the
question had asked later for the corresponding expressions for a put, then the method
presented here would have saved you a considerable amount of time. It often pays to
read all the parts of a question before starting it.
Page 9
[]
Substituting the expressions for f and y from (i)(a) into this gives:
V0 = S0 + =
er d
( S u k ) d r
S 0u k
S0 e r 0
= e ( S0u k )
S0 (u d )
ud
ud
[1]
[Total 1]
(i)(c) Price of European put option using put-call parity
Put-call parity says that for European calls and puts with the same strike price and date:
p0 + S0 = c0 + ke - r
[]
So:
p0 = c0 + ke - r - S0
er - d
= e - r ( S0 u - k )
+ ke - r - S0
u-d
=
ie
e- r
S0 ue r - S0 ud - ke r + kd + ku - kd - S0 ue r + S0 de r
u - d
=e
-r
er - u
( S0 d - k ) u - d
[1]
[Total 1]
V0 = f S0 +y = e - r EQ (C | F0 ) = e - r q ( S0u - k )
Page 10
where C is the call option payoff at time 1 and q is the required (risk-neutral)
probability of an upward stock price movement.
[]
Now, comparing the pricing formula for the call option in (i)(b) to:
e - r EQ (C ) = e - r q ( S0u - k )
gives us:
q=
er - d
u-d
[]
[Total 1]
A new question has been added on the Merton model as follows. (Note that all of the
existing questions are still relevant.)
Question
An analyst is using the Merton model, together with the following information, to value
the five-year zero-coupon bonds (ZCBs) issued by a company:
(i)
(ii)
Using your answer to (i) to obtain an initial estimate, and then applying linear
interpolation, estimate the value of the companys assets (to the nearest $10,000)
and hence show that the value of its ZCBs is $76.47 million.
[5]
(iii)
(a)
State the formula for the delta of a European call option based on the
Black-Scholes formula (assuming no dividends) and use it to derive a
formula for the delta of the ZCBs with respect to the value of the
companys assets.
(b)
Estimate the numerical value of delta using your calculations in part (ii)
and use it to estimate the new value of the ZCBs following a $10 million
fall in the value of the companys assets.
[1]
(c)
Page 11
The actual value of the ZCBs following a $10 million fall in the value of
the companys assets is $76.16 million. Give a possible reason for the
discrepancy between your estimated value of the ZCBs and the actual
value.
[5]
[Total 11]
Solution
(i)
[1]
Adding together the value of the company shares and the risk-free ZCBs gives a starting
value for the value of its assets of:
[]
Recall the Merton model for the current value of the shares:
Et = Ft F( d1 ) - L e - r (T -t ) F(d 2 ) ,
where d1 =
F
log t + r + s 2 (T - t )
L
s T -t
, d 2 = d1 - s T - t
[]
So, substituting the starting value of 196.34 for Ft into this formula, together with:
gives:
d1 =
196.34
log
+ 0.05 + 0.252 5
100
0.25 5
= 1.9336
[]
Page 12
[]
and hence:
Et = 196.34 F(1.9336) - 100 e -0.055 F(1.3746) = $119.832m
0.97342
[]
0.91537
This is (about 1.37) greater than the observed market capitalisation and delta (the
change in the share price with respect to the total asset value) is positive. So, try a
lower estimate for the total asset value.
[]
Note also that as the option represented by the shares is very in-the-money (as Ft is
much greater than L = 100 ), delta is close to one.
So, in order to reduce the market capitalisation by about 1.37, we need to try a value of
Ft a bit more than 1.37 less than 196.34. So, we next try Ft = 194.90 . This gives:
d1 =
194.90
log
+ 0.05 + 0.252 5
100
0.25 5
= 1.9205
0.97260
0.91331
This is just below the market capitalisation of $118.46 (and delta is close to one), so
lets try an asset value that is slightly higher, eg Ft = 194.95 . This gives:
d1 =
194.95
log
+ 0.05 + 0.252 5
100
0.25 5
= 1.9209
Page 13
and hence:
Et = 194.95 F(1.9209) - 100 e -0.055 F(1.3619) = $118.479m
0.97263
0.91338
Ft = 194.90 + 0.05
118.46 - 118.431
= $194.93m
118.479 - 118.431
[2 for correct Ft via appropriate interpolation]
d1 =
195.00
log
+ 0.05 + 0.252 5
100
0.25 5
= 1.9214
0.97266
0.91346
Ft = 194.90 + 0.10
118.46 - 118.431
= $194.93m
118.528 - 118.431
[2 for correct Ft via appropriate interpolation]
[]
[Maximum 5]
[]
Page 14
[]
DB = 1 - DE
[]
So, recalling that the Merton model suggests that the companys shares are effectively a
European call option on its underlying assets, we have:
D B = 1 - F(d1 )
[]
[Total 2]
[]
D B = 1 - 0.9727 = 0.0273
If the value of the companys assets falls by $10 million, the value of the ZCBs will
therefore fall by approximately:
10 D B = 10 0.02738 = $0.2738m
[1]
[]
to:
[Total 2]
Page 15
GB =
2 Ft
Et2
=-
f (d1 )
<0
Fts T - t
which tells us that delta decreases as the value of the companys assets increases and
conversely that it increases with a fall in the value of the companys assets. So, in this
instance, assuming delta is constant means that the fall in the value of the ZCBs is
under-estimated. Hence, the estimated ZCB value is greater than the actual value.
Page 16
5.1
Study material
We offer the following study material in Subject CT8:
Online Classroom
Flashcards
Sound Revision
Revision Notes
Mock Exam
For further details on ActEds study materials, please refer to the 2014 Student
Brochure, which is available from the ActEd website at www.ActEd.co.uk.
5.2
Tutorials
We offer the following tutorials in Subject CT8:
For further details on ActEds tutorials, please refer to our latest Tuition Bulletin, which
is available from the ActEd website at www.ActEd.co.uk.
5.3
Page 17
Marking
You can have your attempts at any of our assignments or mock exams marked by
ActEd. When marking your scripts, we aim to provide specific advice to improve your
chances of success in the exam and to return your scripts as quickly as possible.
For further details on ActEds marking services, please refer to the 2015 Student
Brochure, which is available from the ActEd website at www.ActEd.co.uk.
5.4