Professional Documents
Culture Documents
mix design are tested for their strength with the help of compressive strength test on
concrete cubes and cylinders.
The concrete mix design proves to provide better quality economically.
Following are the advantages of concrete mix designs:
1. Good quality concrete as per requirements this means the concrete will have required
strength, workability, impermeability, durability, density and homogeneity.
2. Nominal mix concrete may suggest more cement than other materials, and concrete mix
designs gives the accurate quantity of cement consumption. Thus it is an economical
solution for large projects.
It is possible to save up to 15% of cement for M20 grade of concrete with the help of
concrete mix design. In fact higher the grade of concrete more are the savings. Lower
cement content also results in lower heat of hydration and hence reduces shrinkage cracks.
3. Best use of available materials:
The nominal mix of concrete does not consider the quality of local construction materials.
The concrete mix design is based on the quality of available materials locally. Thus it is
also an economical solution to reduce the transportation cost of materials from long
distance.
4. Desired Concrete Properties:
The designed mix concrete will have desired concrete properties based on project or
construction requirements. Requirements such as durability, strength, setting times,
workability etc. can be controlled with the type of construction with concrete mix design.
Other requirements such as early de-shuttering, pumpability, flexural strength, lightweight
concrete can also be controlled.
Requirements of concrete mix design should be known before calculations for concrete
mix. Mix design is done in the laboratory and samples from each mix designed is tested for
confirmation of result. But before the mix design process is started, the information about
available materials, strength of concrete required, workability, site conditions etc. are
required to be known.
In cold climates, the initial setting time of concrete increases as the moisture loss rate is
very low. Due to this, water cement ratio is considered appropriately. Admixtures should
also be recommended to prevent freezing of concrete in case of very cold climate.
5. Exposure conditions of concrete: Exposure conditions play an important role in the mix
design of concrete. The exposure conditions such as chemical actions, coastal areas etc.
needs to be considered for the given site. Generally exposure conditions as per code of
practices are mild, moderate, severe, very severe and extreme exposure conditions for
concrete constructions.
The grade of concrete and durability requirements of concrete changes with exposure
conditions. For extreme exposure conditions some standard codes mention minimum
strength of concrete as M35.
6. Batching and mixing methods: There are two types of batching method, i.e. volumetric
batching and batching by weight. These two conditions should be known for concrete mix
design calculations.
The mixture design of Reactive Powder Concrete primarily involves the creation of a dense
granular skeleton. Optimization of the granular mixture can be achieved by the use of
packing models.
Property of RPC
Description
Recommended
value
Type of failure
eliminated
Reduction in
aggregate size
Coarse aggregate
are replace by
fine sand, with a
reduction in the
size of the coarse
aggregate by a
factor of about
50.
Maximum size of
fine sand is 600
m
Mechanical,
chemical &
thermomechanical
Enhanced
mechanical
properties
Improved
mechanical
properties of the
paste by the
addition of silica
fume
Youngs modulus
values in 50-75
Gpa range
Distribution on
the mechanical
stress field
Reduction in
aggregate to
matrix ratio
Limitation of sand
content
Volume of the
paste is at least
20 % voids index
of noncompacted sand
By any external
source (for
example
formwork).
The Reactive Powder Concrete family includes two types of concrete, designated RPC 200
and RPC 800, which offers interesting implicational possibilities in different areas.
Mechanical for the two types of RPC are given in the table. The high flexural strength of
RPC is due to addition steel fibres.
Comparison of RPC 200 Mpa and RPC 800 Mpa:
Property
Pre-setting pressurization,
Mpa
Compressive strength
170 to 230
490 to 680
650 to 810
30 to 60
45 to 141
Table shows typical mechanical properties of RPC compared to a conventional HPC having
compressive strength of 80 Mpa. As fracture toughness, which is a measure of energy
absorbed per unit volume of material to fracture, is higher for RPC, it exhibits high
ductility. Apart from their exceptional mechanical properties, RPC have an ultra-dense
microstructure, giving advantageous water proofing and durability characters. These
materials can be therefore be used for industrial and nuclear waste storage facilities.
RPC has ultra-high durability characteristic resulting from its extremely low porosity, low
permeability, limited shrinkage and increasing corrosion resistance. In comparison to HPC,
there is no RPC given in table enable its use in chemically aggressive environments and
where physical wear greatly limits the life of other concretes.
Laboratory investigations of Materials used in RPC:
The materials used for the laboratory study, there is specification and properties have been
presented in the table.
Materials used in the study and their properties:
Sl.n
o
Sample
Specific gravity
3.15
31 m 7.5 m
1.
2.
Micro silica
2.2
5.3 m 1.8 m
3.
Quartz powder
2.7
5.3 m 1.3 m
4.
Standard sand,
grade-1
5.
6.
River sand
2.65
0.6mm 0.3 mm
7.1
Length: 30 mm
and diameter:0.4
mm
2.61
2.36 mm 0.15
mm
Mixture proportions
RPC F
HPC F
1.00
1.00
0.25
0.12
0.31
1.09
0.20
0.03
0.023
0.4
0.4
Workability and density were recorded for the fresh concrete mixtures. Some RPC
specimens were heat cured by heating in a water bath at 90o C after until the time of testing.
Specimens of RPC and HPC were also cured in water at room temperature. The
performance of RPC and HPC was monitored over time with respect to the following
parameters.
Compressive strength
Flexural strength
Water absorption
The workability of RPC mixtures (with and without fibres), measured using the mortar
flow table test as r\per ASTMC10916, was in the range of120-140%. On the other hand, the
workability of HPC mixtures (with fibres), measured using the slump test as per ASTM
C23117, was in the range of 120-150mm. The density of fresh RPC and HPC mixture was
found to be in the range of 2500-2650 kg/m3.
Compressive strength:
The compressive strength analysis throughout the study shows that RPC has higher
compressive strength than HPC, as shown in fig. compressive strength is one of the factors
linked with durability of a material.
The maximum compressive strength of RPC obtained from this study is as 200Mpa, while
the maximum strength obtained for HPC is 75Mpa. The incorporation of fibres and use of
heat curing was seen to enhance the compressive strength of RPC by 30 to 50%. The
incorporation of fibres did not affect the compressive strength of HPC significantly.
Flexural strength of RPC:
Plain RPC was found to possess marginally higher flexural strength than HPC. Table
clearly explains the variation in flexural strength of RPC and HPC with the addition of steel
fibers. Here the increase of flexural strength of RPC with the addition of fibers is higher
than that of HPC.
As per literature, RPC 200should have an approximate flexural strength of 40 Mpa. The
reason for low flexural strength obtained in the study could be that the fibers used (30mm)
were long and their diameter was relatively higher. Fibre reinforced RPC (with appropriate
fibres) has the potential to be used in structures without any additional steel reinforcement.
This cost reduction in reinforcement can compensate the increase in cost by the elimination
of coarse aggregates in RPC to some extent.
Flexural Strength at 28 days, Mpa
RPC
NC
11
RPC F
NC
18
HPC
NC
8
HPC F
NC
10
Maximum size of aggregate affects the workability and strength of concrete. It also
influences the water demand for getting a certain workability and fine aggregate content
required for achieving a cohesive mix.
For a given weight, higher the maximum size of aggregate, lower is the surface
area of coarse aggregates and vice versa. As maximum size of coarse
aggregate reduces, surface area of coarse aggregate increases. Higher the
surface area, greater is the water demand to coat the particles and
generate workability. Smaller maximum size of coarse aggregate will require
greater fine aggregate content to coat particles and maintain cohesiveness of
concrete mix. Hence 40 mm down coarse aggregate will require much less
water than 20 mm down aggregate. In other words for the same
workability, 40mm down aggregate will have lower water/cement
ratio, thus higher strength when compared to 20mm down aggregate.
Because of its lower water demand, advantage of higher maximum
size of coarse aggregate can be taken to
lower the cement consumption.
maximum size of aggregate, which will have lower area of contact with cement mortar
paste, will fail earlier because of bond failure. Hence for higher grades of concrete (M40
and higher) it is advantageous to use lower maximum size of aggregate to prevent bond
failure.
Grading of coarse aggregate:
The coarse aggregate grading limits are given in IS 383 1970 table 2, Clause 4.1 and 4.2
for single size aggregate as well as graded aggregate. The grading of coarse aggregate is
important to get cohesive & dense concrete. The voids left by larger coarse aggregate
particles are filled by smaller coarse aggregate particles and so on. This way, the
volume of mortar (cement-sand-water paste) required to fill the final voids is minimum.
However, in some cases gap graded aggregate can be used where some intermediate size is
not used. Use of gap-graded aggregate may not have adverse effect on strength. By proper
grading of coarse aggregate, the possibility of segregation is minimised, especially for
higher workability. Proper grading of coarse aggregates also improves thecompactability of
concrete.
Shape of coarse aggregate:
CoAse aggregates can have round, angular, or irregular shape. Rounded aggregates because
of lower surface area will have lowest water demand and also have lowest mortar paste
requirement. Hence they will result in most economical mixes for concrete grades up to
M35. However, for concrete grades of M40 and above (as in case of max size of aggregate)
the possibility of bond failure will tilt the balance in favour of angular aggregate with more
surface area. Flaky and elongated coarse aggregate particles not only increase the water
demand but also increase the tendency of segregation. Flakiness and elongation also reduce
the flexural strength of concrete. Specifications by Ministry of Surface Transport restrict
the combined flakiness and elongation to 30% by weight of coarse aggregates.
Strength of coarse aggregate:
Aggregate Absorption:
Aggregate can absorb water up to 2 % by weight when in bone dry state, however, in some
cases the aggregate absorption can be as high as 5%. Aggregate absorption is used for
applying a correction factor for aggregates in dry condition and determining water demand
of concrete in saturated surface dry condition.
FACTORS AFFECTING CONCRETE MIX DESIGN STRENGTH
Factors that affects the concrete mix design strengths are:
Variables in Mix Design
A. Water/cement ratio
B. Cement content
C. Relative proportion of fine & coarse aggregates
D. Use of admixtures
A. Water/cement ratio
Cement is the core material in concrete, which acts as a binding agent and imparts strength
to the concrete. From durability considerations cement content should not be reduced below
300Kg/m3 for RCC. IS 456 2000 recommends higher cement contents for more severe
conditions of exposure of weathering agents to the concrete. It is not necessary that higher
cement content would result in higher strength. In fact latest findings show that for the
same water/cement ratio, a leaner mix will give better strength. However, this does not
mean that we can achieve higher grades of concrete by just lowering the water/cement
ratio. This is because lower water/cement ratios will mean lower water contents and result
in lower workability. In fact for achieving a given workability, a certain quantity of water
will be required. If lower water/cement ratio is to be achieved without disturbing the
workability,cement content will have to be increased. Higher cement content helps us in
getting the desired workability at a lower water/cement ratio. In most of the mix design
methods, the water contents to achieve different workability levels are given in form of
empirical relations.
Water/cement ratios required to achieve target mean strengths are interpolated from graphs
given in IS 10262 Clause 3.1 and 3.2 fig 2. The cement content is found as follows:
Thus, we see that higher the workability of concrete, greater is cement content
required and vice versa. Also, greater the water/cement ratio, lower is the cement
content required and vice versa.
C. Relative proportion of fine, coarse aggregates gradation of
aggregates
iii. Cement content: Leaner mixes require more proportion of fine aggregates than richer
mixes. This is because cement particles also contribute to the fines in concrete.