Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
The wooden defects identification plays a vital role
while making wooden materials. In order to find the
defects in the wooden pieces is complex when these
wooden raw materials grind in the mill. Our goal is
obtain the wooden defects without producing any human
efforts and cost. The wooden knots which affects the
wooden creatures. Many companies take steps to avoid
wooden materials with the knots and the defects. But it
leads to more cost and need more number human
resource. The feature can be extracted to obtain the
results of defects. We propose NSGA II algorithm for
aspect set extraction. The idea behind the NSGA II is
that a ranking selection method is used to emphasize
good points and a niche method is used to maintain
stable subpopulations of good points. It differs from
simple genetic algorithm only in the way the selection
operator works.
Keywords: NSGA II Algorithm, Grayscale based Aspect.
1. INTRODUCTION
Nowadays, the visual defect removal process in
wood is done in the rough mill. Selection of wood defect
still relies on manpower as the operators, where
operators must quickly examine a board for defects and
then remove them while maximizing the yield for parts.
The operators must perform multiple operations at high
speed and under difficult conditions. Refers to that fact,
a critical need for improved processing in the wood
products manufacturing industry is the development of a
new system that can efficiently and cost-effectively
convert existing wood raw materials into high-quality
products. The development of new processing
technologies will require a sensing system that can
automatically inspect wood and accurately pinpoint
critical aspects that affect the quality of the internal
product. This system would allow accurate and
consistent identification of the type and location of
defects for either removal or grading purposes.
Automatic inspection system to detect wood knot need
www.ijsret.org
122
International Journal of Scientific Research Engineering & Technology (IJSRET), ISSN 2278 0882
Volume 3 Issue 1, April 2014
2. RELATED WORK
The use of a Pareto-based approach instead of a
classical one is supported by the theory as well as the
experiments carried out. We have also shown the
importance of using a validation set in order to avoid
selecting subsets of aspects with poor generalization
ability. The experts usually do an initial identification
with respect to the macroscopic elements (the
impression of touch, smell, weight, color). If there is still
doubt, then the expert will observe the microscopic
elements in the cross-sectional area, radial cross-section,
and cross tangent. This activity uses a magnifying glass.
In previous research have showed that the
recognition rate varied results with a variety of methods
used, include:
Aspect used is the texture analyst added RGB
with enlargement 24 times, using five different
types of wood.
Aspect used is the texture analyst; method used
is ANFIS and uses five types of wood.
Next research is the comparison of rate
recognition based input aspects with enlarged 24
times, using five different types of wood.
The next research using 15 types of wood,
texture analysts and RGB as input ANN, using
ANNBP and give the recognition rate 95%.This
value is enough high, due to the number of
species that used only 15 types, and test data that
are used most of the images are sourced from the
same sample with image training.
The drawbacks are listed below
Recognition rate and the aspects that used in this
research have not been satisfactory.
3. METHODOLOGY
Many different types of aspects can appear on
the surface of wooden boards, lineal or parts. Some of
these aspects should not appear on the surfaces of wood
products. These aspects then become undesirable or
removable defects for those products. To manufacture
these products boards are cutup in such a way that these
undesirable defects will not appear in the final product.
Studies have shown that manual cutup of boards does
not produce the highest possible yield of final product
from rough lumber. Because of this fact a good deal of
research work has been done to develop automatic defect
detection systems [6, 4]. Color images contain a lot of
valuable information which can be used to locate and
identify aspects in wood.
A very important part of any automatic defect
detection system based wholly or impart on color
imagery is the location of areas that might contain a
wood aspect, aspect that depending on the product being
manufactured may or may not be a defect. This location
process is called Image Enhancement. While a number
of automatic defect detection systems have been
proposed that employ color imagery, none of these
systems use color imagery to do the Image Enhancement
[8, 17]. Rather these systems typically average the red,
green, and blue color channels together to form a black
and white image. The Image Enhancement operation is
then performed on the black and white image. The basic
hypothesis of this research is that the use of full color
imagery to locate defects will yield better Image
Enhancement results than can be obtained when only
black and white imagery is used. To approach the color
wood image Enhancement problem two conventional
clustering procedures were selected for examination [10,
16].
The methodology of the proposed system
consists of image acquisition, image pre-processing,
aspect extraction, Clustering and dimension reduction in
the pre classification stage and the final classification.
3.1. Image Acquisition
The 500x500 pixel wooden images are collected
as a dataset for the application.
www.ijsret.org
123
International Journal of Scientific Research Engineering & Technology (IJSRET), ISSN 2278 0882
Volume 3 Issue 1, April 2014
www.ijsret.org
124
International Journal of Scientific Research Engineering & Technology (IJSRET), ISSN 2278 0882
Volume 3 Issue 1, April 2014
Let
be the cumulative
histogram value of color I at channel k, where Hk(j) is
the histogram value for color j at channel k, N be the
depth of channel k, the feature value for percentile y is:
Fk(y)=I, where Ck(i) y, 1 i N
Where the mean value be
And the total amount of values all the pixels of a
two dimensional matrix m x n pixels is
Tr
ai
ni
ng
im
ag
e
Training Image
Test image
Blocking Image
Metrics Performance
GD
Best
Worst
Median
Average
SP
Best
Worst
Median
Average
Image Blocks
Image Segment
Blocks
(Edge Detection)
NSGA-I
0.03072
0.11512
0.06454
0.06629
0.00858
0.03048
0.01434
0.014995
NSGA-II
0.02993
0.41516
0.09786
0.11863
0.00645
0.49180
0.4142
0.08465
OUTPUT
Iteration count = 1, obj. fcn = 22026440.452337
NSGA-II
Decision
Making
Feature
Extraction
(Correlation)
www.ijsret.org
125
International Journal of Scientific Research Engineering & Technology (IJSRET), ISSN 2278 0882
Volume 3 Issue 1, April 2014
5. CONCLUSION
6. REFERENCES
www.ijsret.org
126
International Journal of Scientific Research Engineering & Technology (IJSRET), ISSN 2278 0882
Volume 3 Issue 1, April 2014
www.ijsret.org
127