Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lehigh Preserve
Fritz Laboratory Reports
1967
This Technical Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Civil and Environmental Engineering at Lehigh Preserve. It has been accepted
for inclusion in Fritz Laboratory Reports by an authorized administrator of Lehigh Preserve. For more information, please contact
preserve@lehigh.edu.
,
j
A.ABC:;~ATO~Y_.
r7?/TZ
\~ C/L?7~4r
$r.A?,.6';oGP'~,.y
__,,2 /;:~;;c;~/V&"""O
. ~,..q~&..L.:
A-"~~..R _..;;?~Lt:9
"'~~'A:??;.':""" ~~,.y.Z~-
,ry
~/~~.4Rt:P"C"
~..f.
.......
"""'005~~ Ve:~
q~
A'k./s
C7~?~:1~
--;-------------------------------_.-_._-_...,-------.----,-.._------k
Cd;?
Io-"7?-"?
- - - - _..._,..
$~
.v
~.s)
6)
_._.~---------_._
$40.>''-1;;' 6av~
'"
'"
,,~
/rc"'S,;?7'bt?"
.r-?re:rfr-?7iP:;/~.
t:?Y'e.....o/C"
rk t?Yt:"--~
/V=- ~ ~.2..
/f' =-
-6" r.-?'C'"
.3$,
as-
J!
!~
I te/
;rCev.> ~ 1/-}
--------_.-----_P._--_..-.._.- --
__.~~.=_C-?7c;:vv
! ,..::;'AG.-!-!
.5:r~ P
s""'v~
4Qn'"
diO
4~
..#;r<..... "."",..
--iI
2'-
0:..r4.;;". e
_-
($2
I
;
~: ~
4/
-t'9 0 I'};.
1:1
reo
//0
.. a 66' /;'..
I Arr ~(/-~
r'"
II
L.
~..
7-
;J(~
~.
~r
Cl~4(/-e>.$.S)
/:
"/tIJ., If:' ...( ~~
~ e:;J..,";;~
Zl:
a:;?
. , . ...
q~
)
6/"'1.
~O~ /~
.. O. '.;JI'..."
==-
6: . $.......4'#
oft/O
r:::l?
~. c;;-'" qt:1 G 2
;:,~
.1:'G8
Iff
a7t6/ ..
/4'" "
aGS "
9.9,,0"
~7..sn
by
Joseph F. Vojta
and
Alexis Ostapenko
-i
248.18
TABLE OF CONTENTS
iii
ABSTRACT
1.
INTRODUCTION
2.
Computation Procedure
11
12
26
27
2.2.1
29
2.2.2
Discussion of the
33
3.1.1
3.1.2
Proc~dure
39
40
40
41
Numerical Integl'ation
3.2.1 Typical Ultimate Strength Plots
42
43
3.2.2
4.
2.1.4
3.3
2.1.7
3.2
2.1.6
3.
2.1.3
2.1.5
2.2
42
45
47
47
50
54
-ii
248.18
4.2
56
4.2.2
4.2.3
4.2.4
59
4.2.5
5.
60
64
66
68
5.1
5.2
68
69
Conclusions
Recommendations for Future Research
6.
NOMENCLATURE
71
7.
76
8.
APPENDIX
8.1 Numerical Integration for Ultimate Strength
8.1.1 Subscripting
8.1.2 Initial Values
8.1.3 First Segment
9.
111
111
111
112
112
8.1.4
Other Segments
114-
8.1. 5
End Conditions
A) Pinned Ends
B) Fixed Ends
Ultimate Condition
116
116
117
117
8.1.6
57
REFERENCES
120
-iii
248.18
ABSTRACT
This report presents the results of an analytical investigation of the ultimate strength of longitudinally stiffened plate
panels with plate width to thickness ratios such that the plate
buckles before the ultimate strength of the panel is reached.
The loading conditions considered are axial loads at the ends
and a simultaneous uniformly.distributed load applied laterally.
The major element of the panels is a plate having a large widththickness ratio (bit) such that the plate buckles before the
attainment of the ultimate axial load.
The analysis is performed by solving equilibrium equations
numerically with a digital computer.
248.18
-1
1.
INTRODUCTION
..
A ship hull is essentially a hollow box girder composed of
plates stiffened by a grid of longitudinal and transverse members,
Fig. 1.1.
The longitudinal
framing resists the bending action and also increases the buckling
strength of the outer plating by subdividing it into a series of
..
subpanels.
of longitudinal framing.
This report deals with the analysis and design of the longitudinally stiffened plate panels which serve as the bottom
plating.
An
248.18
-2
This
plate
(l)~
buckling load.
its main plate element, and the correct prediction of the failure
load depends on the knowledge of the
be~avior
of this plate
component.
The history of the stability of plates under edge compression
dates back to 1891, when Bryan presented the analysis for a simply
supported rectangular plate acted upon by a uniformly distributed
compressive load on two opposite edges of the plate.** Davidson
studied plate action in the P9stbuckling range.(6)
He recommended
* The
248.18
-3
In 1965 Tsuiji
The ultimate
.,
..
,.
-4
248.18
..
248.18"
-5
2.
~he
panel as
m-~-P
Moment-Curvature Relationships
Kondo developed
M-~
for the case where the cross section contained plate elements
that have width-thickness ratios, (bit), sufficiently low, such
that the plate would not buckle until after the ultimate load is
reached.(l)
method to find the M-0 relationships for cross sections where the
main element was a plate having a large bit value and which buckled
before failure.(3)
248.18
'.
-6
utilized here .
Moment-curvature relationships for constant axial thrust,
depend on the magnitude of the axial load, the moment, the
material properties of the member, namely the yield stresses of
the plate and stiffener, the dimensions of the cross section, and
the magnitude and distribution of the residual stresses.
2.1.1
The
loads considered are a compressive axial load, pI, acting into the
plane of the paper and "a uniformly distributed lateral load, q, on
the plate side of the cross section causing compresssion in the
plate at the center of the span during bending, (Fig. 2.2).
The
moments, mC and mD, are a portion of the total panel moment, mI.
The end moments are assumed equal and are called m.
In the
idealized cross section the areas of the plate and stiffener flange
are assumed to be concentrated about a horizontal line through their
248.18
-7
mid-thicknesses.*
Residual Stresses
The zone
The compressive
where
cr r
= the
= the
= the
(2.2)
-8
248.18
-.
where
cR
(2.3)
is the plate buckling coefficient which depends on the length-towidth ratio of the plate.
The ratio .vb for "longitudinally stiffened panels is usually
larger than 3 and the corresponding k value is approximately equal
to 4.
a cR
TT
E
2
3(1-~
(b/t)2
(2.4)
248.18
-9
This
-10
248.18
The plate
max
= 1.2
(~)0.6
cR
0.2
0.65
(EO
cR
-0.2
+ 0.45
(::R)
(2.5)
cr
248.18
-11
0.6
crp.)
= 12 (e
- )
(cr cR max
.. cR
cR
'
cR
3( 1 - E)
~)
2(YP} + 3
cR
t
where
- 0.65 (
-0.2
+0.45 (~) (2.5)
cR
(2.6)
- 1
2.1.5
Stress-Strain Diagrams
stress~strain
diagrams for the plate and for the stiffener are very important.
Utilizing the plate buckling action, the diagrams chosen are shown
in Fig. 2.7.
The stress-strain diagram for the plate has 3 steps for the
compression range, '(Fig. 2. 7a).
248.18
-12
Assumptions
2)
3)
cro~s
section.
The idealized
248.18
-13
.t
4)
5)
6)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
248.18
13)
14)
When
Sign Convention
2)
3)
Positive Bending
cr
- fA w (e s + ~)E
- gA e
(e E - cr )
Ew
ys
(2.7)
248.18
-15
where
= the
= the
. respectively.
= the average stress in the plate
cr
cr
ys
cr
= the
f,g
.
f
where
d = the depth of the stiffener.
a
= the
0'=
AW
Af
'2 (A + A
(2.9)
248.18
-16
gd = d
(2.10 )
e-ys
ee-e s
(2.11)"
:+:~s
fd = d [ 1 - (
)J
(2.12)
be rewritten.
dimensional form, the equations will
The non-
(2
ecR
~) - 2"f
ecR
_2)-e
cr
(Jr
cR
cR
Aw (~ + cryS )
A e cR
cr cR
( l _ cryS )
Aw
A . e cR
Af(cryS+~)
A
crcR
e cR
(2.13 )
crcR
e A
1
1
cr
A
___) _ w + -f (l-a--f)( YS4 s~
cR A
2
3
cr cR eCRrA
s
e cR
+ (l-a) ( --- +
- 2" g
(0' -
1
39")
cr yS )
cr cR
(2.14)
(2.15 )
248.18
...
g
-17
= a (2_~)(1)
cR
cR
T
,
..
f = 1 - a
(2.16)
cR
(2
+ ~) (+)
cR
cR
~
(2.17)
cR
where
cR
= the
cR
=E
(2.18)
(2.19)
(2.20)
SpL = ad
.P
CR
= the
P CR = AO'cR
S L
(2.22)
-18
248.18
following procedure:
( 1)
(2)
The terms (
~
cR
~eb
YS
C1
)
C1 c R
(3)
When (e +
If)
C1
(4 )
When ecR < (ee + 1:) < e p max' the plate has buckled,
but the average plate stress has not yet reached its
C1
( 5)
When (ee + 1:) > p max' the average plate stress has
reached its maximUm value and remains constant.
C1
pmax
Thus
yielding~
In this
248.18
-19
Using steps (1), (2), and (3), above, the axial load and moment
can be written as
P
P cR
mcR
_ s
Aw
- cR + 2A
1 [
(2_i)
cR
) ( s
1 (1
= (SpL) ['2
(2.23)
cR
"3 -
ex
rCR
Ad
PcR
...E:.....
(2.25)
~cR
mcR
(SpL)L 2
Ad
(2.26)
cR
.
m-~
relationships.
solved directly while the axial load equations are rearranged and
used to solve for
~/~cR.
The value of the ultimate '"bending moment for the cross section
is required by the numerical integration procedure.
This moment
248.18
-20
1)
~)J
O'eR
= _ 1 ~1"(O'_!')
2
max (S"T'
~
( ...!!!.....).
m
eR
.Ad
(2.27)
.1" =
2)
m)
.( --meR
O'S) Af
- --A 0' eR
Q'
Ap C O'ys _
A O'eR
+ O'r "l
O'eR
O'eR LJ
0' pmax
Ad
(2.29)
where
(2.30)
3)
m)
eR max
m--
= (SlpL
O'p _ O'ru
O'eR
O'eR
(2.31)
Ad
where
=
GL
Pe R
(2.32)
-21
248.18
D.
Negative Bending
1f (E -cr )A - 29"1(Ee+crys) A
- -2
,s ys w
w
(2.33)
(2.34)
..,
(2.35)
gd = _ ( e +~ys ) d
see
(2.36)
]
[1 + ( es+e_YS)
d
e
.
fd =
(2.37)
es
1 (
P cR - cR.- 2"
e cR
ee ) Aw
cR
T -
( s
e cR
(2.38)
-22
248.18
1:
f
2
(1-0'-
1:3 f )
(2.39)
(2.40)
f =1 - 0'
(2
-~
)
e
e
cR
(2.41)
cR
Table 2b
contains the equations for axial load and bending moment for various
strain conditions for negative bending.
When e
248.18
-23
(2)
When
ys < (e
O'r
The term
e
O'ys )
does not exist and is assumed to be
( -- +
cR
O'cR
equal to zero.
(3)
.term
0'
(--2.
O'cR
(4 )
When cR < (e
but the average plate stress has not yet reached its
maximum value.
Then
0'
O'r'
When (e + --E) > pmax ,the average plate stress has
.
reached its maximum value and remains constant.
O'p =
(6 )
0'
Thus
pmax .
O'r
When (e + T) < - yp' the plate has yielded in
tension.
Thus
v~p
=-
v~
yp .
is expressed by
O'r
s > ys' (e+ --)
E > c R ,
O'r
ys < (e + r) < ys
-24
248.18
From steps (1) and (4), above, the axial load and moment can be
written as
cR
cR
_e)~_(_s
(2.43 )
+(
O"pKoiter
O"cR
A + ~f (l-~- ~f)
W
(2.44)
(A:
A;)
+ 2"
O"pKoiter
+
O"cR
( e _
~)
cR
cR
0":; ) f - (CR- ~)
cR
2
(2.45)
(:w)
(~)
-25
248.18
mcR
1
= --;:::--
(s~~)
[~
(2.46)
(.l!!.-)
=
m max
C~~)
cR
~ a]
( 2 .47)
T =
As
[ A
(~)_
C1
cR
(C1 pmax
C1 cR
..2)J
ocR
(2.48)
-26
.24.8.18
2)
(2.49)
where
(2.50)
2.1.7
Computation Procedure
m-~
Fig. 2.10.
The steps are as follows:
1)
2)
plate strains,
3)
cR
248.18
-27
6)
~,
cR
corresponding to this strain state.
8)
~,
cR
Approximately
l-~
curve.
The m-~ curve thus computed is ready for use in the numerical
-28
248.18
apply this method to sections with a plate having high bit such
-that the plate buckles.
The procedure is used to compute, for given material parameters, the maximum slenderness ratio that the panel can have
while sustaining the assigned loading conditions.
found for both fixed and pinned end conditions.
Solutions are
By assuming a
Then,
obtained.
plots .
248.18
-29
2.2.1
= ds
= the
= the
= the
(2.51)
where
s
~
slope.
distance along the centroid of the panel.
curvature of the panel.
=0
tFy = 0
IMG = 0
tF z
h + qbds p sin e
v + Qbds p cos e
m
vdscos e
=0
(v+dv) = 0
ds
hds sin e - qbds p 2 (h+dh)
(2.52)
(2.53)
(m+dm)
=0
(2.54 )
-30
248.18
'.'
>
,.
In
(2.55)
ad)
dz
= ds
cos 8
(2.56)
dy
= ds sin 8
(2.57)
'.
dh
ds
= qb
(1 - ~ad) sin8
(2.58)
dv
ds
= qb
cos 8
(l-~ad)
(2.59)
dm
ds
(2.60)
- v cos 8 - h sin 8
= 01
0i +l
- ~i
6s.
where .
n n
l"i'l"i+l
6s.
J
s
'J
(2.61)
248.18
-31
ds
(2.62)
(2.63)
and the horizontal and vertical forces and the moment are
....
~
Si+l
h.1+ 1 = hi + . s.
qb(l-~ad)
sin 8ds
= h.1
v.1+ 1
cos 8. )
1
(2.64)
li+l
s.
qb(l-~ad) cos 8 ds
1
= v. + qbl1z. - qbad ( sin 8 i +l - sin 8.1 )
1
J
= v.1
. mi + l = m.1
= m.
(2.65)
fi+l
fi+l v
ds - s.
cos
8
h sin 8 ds
S.
1
1
2
2
6z.
_6y.J__
_J_
h. l1y . -v . l1z . - qb
ad6z.
2 +
2
1
J 1 J
J
(2.66)
..
l1z. =
J
Ji+l
_
cos8ds ~ l1s .cos8.
s.
J
1
1
(~i
3
~i+l)
6.
sin 8. (6s.)
1
(2.67)
-32
248.18
b.y.
J
=h
(2.69)
cos 8 - v sin 8
= t
i+l
2b.s.
J'7-:::r_---::~-....",
(2.70)
~~ei+l-ei-(0i+1-0i) ad}
where
Eqs. 2.69
are non-dimensionalized.
r
1 2
8 = 8.1 + iP.1 S -d
-2 (iP.1+ l-iP.)(S)
a ~+
yp
1
8.1+ 1
b.Z.
J
= 8.1
+ -2 (iP.1+ l-iP.)
1 b.S.J --d
a ~ yp
b. Sj cos8 i - (
b. y . = b.S.
J
(2.71)
,L
J v gyp
iP.
iP i +l )
T
+ -6-
sin 8
+ ( :i +
aS j )
iP~+l)
(2.72)
2
y~ sin 8 i
(b.S .)2
J
_~
cos 8
CfU
~(sin8.
yp
1+ l-sin8.)]'
1
(2.73)
(2.74)
(2.75)
(2.76)
-33
248.18
'
yp
(cos8. l-COS9.)J
1+
1
(2.77)
N . 1 = H lCes 8. 1 - V. 1
1+
1+
1+
ard
1+
Ie:::
yp
(2.78)
sin 8.1+ 1
268.
L. +
J
-------='-----
(2.79)
2-
where
...
'
6 .
6Y = ~
QIR
= qbEad
2'
Gyp A
H -
G.1+ 1 =
N=
mad
= Y~
r
h
crA'.
yp
= adv
Ar
J~
Gyp
e( i+l) , r
1
- -ad - ~
yp'
~
3'
yp Ar
L - t
2'
yp'
Af
l ' Aw
2
(1-2a) --A + (-3 -a)--A +a
GypA
2 .2.2
num~rical
248.18
-34
.>'
Using this
=0
(2.80 )
fixed~end
condition, defined by
8=0
(2.81)
case.
Throughout the procedure Eqs. 2.71 to 2.77 are used to maintain equilibrium for each segment.
~(i+l)a
at the
other end (terminal end) these equations are solved to find the
moment by Eq. 2.77..
can be obtained from the moment-curvature curve which is now nondimensionalized to the
formM-~.
~(i+l)c
~(i+l)C
is
248.18
segment.
computed.
-35
of the segment
(2.82 )
L=2I;6S.
j
J
mid~span
Z=2I;6Z.
j
J
(2.83)
Y=I;6Y.
j
J
(2.84)
(2)
(3)
~(i+l)a
at the end
of the segment
-36
248.18
.i
(4)
(5)
(6)
From the
M-~
..
(7)
~(i+l)c
as a new
specified amount compute 9.1+ l' H.1+ l' and V.1+ 1 from
Eqs. 2.72, 2.76, and 2.75, sum L, Z, and Y by Eqs.
2.82, 2.83, and 2.84.
Compute L, Z,
248.18
..
-37
When
Calculate L,
~ ~
and repeat
fixed~that
plot.
The result is
the maximum length that the panel can have for the
given set of loads.
'! .
248.18
-38
When
..
M-~
Given
248.18
-39
3.
Numerous computer runs were made and the m-0. curves and
maximum lengths
we~e
The
major emphasis in these runs was for steels having yield stresses
of 34, 47, and 80 ksi which correspond respectively to the MS-34,
HTS-47, and BY-80 steels used by the Navy.*
II,
= 0.35 to 0.. 60
b = 60.to 110
(3.1)
=q
(d/t)
= 40
to 480 psi
= 0.00 to 0.15
Sec. 3.3
....
-40
248.18
.
9
Moment-Curvature Computations
The computation of moment-curvature relationships consist
the cross section, and the computation of the moment and corresponding curvature for the various strain states.
3.1.1
'.
This is again
248.18
..
-41
The
Moment-Curvature Curves
ranges.
'.
cross section .
(2). For high axial loads the. moment is not zero for zero
curvature.
PiP cr
= 1.80
For axial
= 1.60.
*See Ref. 3 for the effect of post buckling on the moment capacity
of the section, as well as its effect on the moment curvature curves.
248.18
-42
,.
Numerical Integration
3.2.1
The relation between the loading and the maximum length that
a"
r = O.lS.
a yp "
=q
(d/t)
= 180
or 320),
and low axial load, the curves are relatively insensitive to changes
in axial load.
in~rease
-43
248.18
~.
The general trends caused by the changes in the various nondimensional geometric parameters will now be briefly discussed.
These are utilized in the development of the design curves
presented in Chapter 4.
-44
248.18
Figures 3.3a and 3.3b show plots for various values ofq(d/t) .
.~
Curves for high bit ratios are consistently above those with lower
ratios.
t/r they vary approximately with the stress ratio cryp Icr c R raised to
"
(.2.)
The reverse is
true for high PIPeR values when the ends are simply-supported or
when bit is less than 80 for the fixed end conditions.
However,
for fixed ends cases with bit greater than 80 the curves for various
As/Ap tend toward convergenceat t/r = O,(Fig. 3.6b) .
248.18
"
-45
A
f
The stiffener area ratio, X-'
has only a small effect on the
s
ultimate strength plots of PIP cR vs. t/r. This is shown in Figs.
Figure
lateral loads of 6.5 psi while T-3 and T-14 had 13.0 psi.
of the plate was about 57 for all specimens.
The bit
-46
248.18
-dotted lines are for cases with assumed plate compressive residual
stresses.
The grillage
psi.
~ested
76.25 which was considerably higher than the values used in the
tests at Lehigh University.
Nevertheless, it
248.18
-47
;,
4.
i,
This chapter
describes ultimate strength design curves for cases where the main
plate element of the panel is in.the postbuckling range (bit> 45). *
~
4.1
These
248.18
..
-48
design curves, presented for one yield stress value, display the
feasibility of obtaining design curves for plate panels with large
b/t.
Corresponding design
This
panel~hat
is,
sectional parameters As/A p ' Af/A s ' b/t, and d/t, and some
dimensional value that will fully dimensionalize the cross section.
-49
248.18
. ..
=
13 =
w =
y =
p
A/A
s p
Af/A s
(4.1)
bit
d/t
..
section.
sectiona~
the stiffeners.
as follows:
Ap
= b 2 /w
2
= p b /w = pA P
2
Af = Sp b /w = SA s
2
Aw = p b /w (l-~) = As
2
A = b /w (l+p)
As
(4.2)
- A
f
-50
248.18
Their
Simply-Supported Ends
0'
Pctx
in such a way
d
= q . (F)'
give
O'cR
By
and 8 held
constant.
However, since
(4.3)
and
P
P
cR O'cR
2
P'w
Bb(l+p)
V5.
= Po = 0.34
".
a =8 o
and
248.18
-51
where
.(tlr)
(1+P7 2)]
PoR
/1yp
= 8l.8
pt;
(4.5)
yP'W
O'cR
and
P
N
(1+p/2)
/yp
0.0003895
p'w2 .
(4.6)
Bb
PCRO'CR
in which O'yp
= 47.0
ksi, E
= 29,600,
J.L
= 0.30
results using numerical analysis for various bIt ratios, while the
lines plot the approximate average. value.
By
y and
= 0.34
and
e = 0.60.*
The
other portions of the design curves will then modify the value of
N for various values of p and
*r
(.
e.
248.18
-52
as bit values get larger, hence in this graph and in the graphs
that follow the curves for bit values greater than SO diverge
noticeably from. those having bit less than SO.
the final design curves utilize separate plots for bit <. 80 and
bit> 80 (see the center graph in Fig. 4.8).
~
. for each-In addition, for p and e other than used in Fig. 4.1
cr yp
the action is relatively unchanged by the residual stresses. Thus
the residual stress variations are accounted for directly in this
starting graph (Fig. 4.8).
The value N must now be modified for different values of p and
a.
Since
a has
= 0.000223
P'w
Bb
(2+ P )
l+p
(4.7)
(1 -
~)(~)
[1
_(Pi~4)(0.707+0.00150*Q)(-21.9/N-.S/2+32.5/N-.8/-1)]
(4.8)
-53
248.18
IN-.81
in Fig. 4.3.
Since the plot in Fig. 4.3 works well for each
~,
it was
used for the final two portions of the design curve (two graphs at
either side of Fig. 4.8).
p (0.20,0.34,0.48).
~,
curves of N vs. R
for various p are combined into one line that represents all p for
a given value of
e.
This is for B
= 0.35
and 8
= 0.60
with
obt~ined.
Then,
PIW2
(2+ p )
from b (inches) = 0.000223
BN
l+p
* At
(4.9)
248.18
..
-54
C4 .10)
Fixed Ends
S = E C tP/ )
PCR(;yp)0.67)
cR
= 45
f;t
p t . 65
yW
C4.11)
-55
248.18
'.
N = ---p---
(4.12)
= 0.001287
(eYYP ) 0.675
cR (JcR
= Po
a = eo .*
As for the simply-supported case, separate curves are drawn
t/r vs.
P c R(eY
.::.l )0.675
eYcR
4.5.
as R vs. N
pI w1. 650
N = 0.0017246
Bb(l+p)
~ ~ (1 - ~.5) [1+
.
[<O.0915/(N-.37)/-O.025)+(
(4.13)
.3~i:,fp)
[0.1585/(N-.68)/+O.012~][~-(Q2~~80)(N - 0.50)]
J(4.14)
.'
248.18
,.
-56
I(N-O.37)/and/(N~0.68)/signifyabsolute
values .
e.
supported case, the curves for various p are combined into one and
the curves are modified to give an R that is "equivalent" to R
based of 6
= 60 ,
e,
computed as
...
b (inches) = 0.0017246
(4.15)
BN(l+p)
computed by Eq. 4.2 and the areas of the total cross section can
be obtained by multiplying these ratios by the width ratio, Bib.
4.2
This is done
...
e = eo
= 0.60).
= 0.34,
-57
248.18
It
=q
(y)).
values of y, w,
loads.
~ssumed
advan~
Schematic Example
q, compute Q.
248.18
-58
O"r
line is
theri~o
A horizontal
these for his cross section, he can stop here and compute b as
follows:
2
'.,
P'w
b (inches) = 0.0003895
"""EN"""
b (inches) .- 0.001287
P'w
Q
~o
1.65
BN'
for S S Ends
(4.16)
for Fixed-Ends
(4.17)
e. i-
correspondi~g
4.15.
b ( inches) = 0.000223
b (inches) = 0.0017246
P' w (2+ p )
BN
l+p
1.65
P'w
BN(l+p)
for S. S. Ends
(4.9)
( 4 .15)
-59
248.18
"
other area values may then be computed for the idealized cross
section by Eqs. 4.2.
section are obtained from Eq. 4.10 and the values for the total
cross section are obtained by multiplication by Bib.
4.2.2
The ultimate strength design curves are shown in Figs. 4.8 and
4.9.
form.
1)
Assume y, w, p, and
~;'
compute
S,
Q,
O'r
O'yp
Formulas for S are given on the design charts
-0
O'r
= 47'
0'
=q
(y), q in psi.
2)
Draw a vertical
O'r
line to the curve for the correct Q and ---.
O'yp
3)
Proceed to the right for bit < 80 and to the left for
bit
4)
80.
If P
80.
= Po = 0.34
and
= ~o = 0.60
compute -b from
or ~ ~
0 0
If either
p~
248.18
5)
-60
~,
6)
7)
8)
4.2.3
Numerical Examples
= 0.. 00
pI = 12,800 ~ips
1)
- 11.25 psi
= 41 1
8' = 500"
= '22'
kSi
= 45.0
500(272)
= 9.~75
12800(16)(60)65
-61
248.18
3)
.'
"
4)
Both
and
curve for p =
5)
Q = 180.
'"'
6)
Dra~ing
7)
b=0.0017246
8)
horizont~lline
0~653.
p,(w)1.650 _
[(12800)(60)1.650]_
BN(l+p)
.- 0.0017246 500(0.653)(1~8) - 39.0 in.
. 2
2
12.17 In. - 4.26 in.
= 7.91-
+ 25.35 in.
in.
= 37.52 in.
3~~~ = 12.82
13.
248.18
-62
b
t - - - 39.0in. = 0.65 in.
60
w
in.
= 0.75
(That is t f
Th
en
_ Af _
f - t f
in)
The idealized cross section for this example is shown in Fig., 4.10.
The total panel will then consist of a plate 500 in. wide with
'"
Given:
P'
= 30'
= 17'
.(,
1)
Assume ~
q
O'r
5800 kips
=
= 204 TT
360 TT
OTT
0"
= 0.60,
O'yp
= 16.0 psi
= 5.0 ksi
= O'ys = 47.0
= 0.48,
= 85,
= 20.
O'r
Compute S, Q, - - , and use Fig. 4.8.
O'yp
= 81.8~P'yw -
81.8
360( 204)
5800( 20) 85
5.0 - 0 . 1062
- r -_ 4"7O'yp
= 7.05
ksi
-63
248.18
-~
2)
Drawing
4)
not,(p~0.34).
5)
6)
7)
8)
Computation
--.
248.18
-64
= 67.8in~.
67.8 (Bib)
= 62.45
0 735
= bl w = 62.45in.
85
=.
= ty = 0.73
p(l-B)b
.y
in. (20)
= 14.69
= 0.48(.40)
20
.
In.
in.
- f - 12.9in. = 14.75 .
f - t - O. 875in.
In.
f
Some remarks
..
saving in time when compared with various other design methods used
248.18
-65
,.
~ .
in a few tentative cross sections that have been decided upon for
further analysis.
ends require less time than do the curves for the fixed end case
that was used here, by virtue of more convenient powers of w in
the various formulas used.
No criteria were enforced for determining the most advantageous
cross section.
However, section
section 7 requires.
instance.
The design curves presented in this chapter determine a cross
section that will just sustain the loading.
..
~'iOne
such criterion for local buckling might be that given for the
web in Reference 2. This conservatively gives
d/w < 8000 (for 47 ksi this gives d/w < 36.9)
- j(Jys
Note that section 5 of the 10 trial sections has d/w ~ 40.9 which
does not fulfill this requirement.
248.18
-66
an~lysis
was
by this substitution.
To calculate these percent
".
*The design curves were formulated from many computer runs. After
these curves were completed, it was found that the computer program
had a slight error. The design curves and the various other graphs
presented in this report still retain this slight error. However,
the comparisons with test results described in Section 3.3 have
been corrected. The discussion of computer programs has also been
corrected.
The corrected slenderness ratios are always higher "than the previous
erroneous results. The differences are generally about 3 percent
for fixed end cases and 5 percent for simply-supported ends. The
extreme maximum errors are about 6.5% for fixed ends and 8.5% for
simply-supported ends. This means that the design curves as
presented are slightly conservative and therefore have a small
safety factor already applied .
248.18
-67
The
"in two specific cases where the axial loads are very low.
Although
the magnitude of error was small for these cases, the percent errors
are still large.
the average percent errors are about 1.6 and 2.1 percent respectively
fo~
,.
.,
248.18
-68
5~
5~lConclusions
'
..
~articular
..
-69
248.18
5.2
should be investigated.*
2)
* Research
".
248.18
4)
-70
With
o.
a)
1II
b)
Initial imperfections.
c)
d)
e)
,;
. 248.18
-71
6.
NOMENCLATURE
"
bf
depth of stiffener
dh
dm
ds
dv
modulus of elasticity
strain ratio
248.18
..
-72
idealized section;
~
cr
yp
non~dimensional
.'
.'
yp
mT
~ending
mT
c
m
cR
"e"
mT
section; - crypA
n
CR
yp
-73
248.18
q (d/t)
QIR
q
lateral load
sp
SpL
t.S
. t.s
thickness of plate
tf .
thickness of flange
t.Y
-74
248.18
".
t,y
t,Z
.a
stress
OCR
0p
average stress
~n
plate
'.
a yp
ys
e cR
p max
yp
e ys
..
curvature
\i1cR
\i1 yp
cR
yp
curvature corresponding to plate yield; ad
-75
248.18
oj
increment of curvature(non-dimensional)
,.
248.18
-76
7.
m-~-P
Table I-a
Strain State
0~
@2r
Ce
c!"s t-----'1
~ce
~
'I------l
@;f'
~s
6/6"
F..
c-.
t----I.-1/a"
I------f
ce
~~~
~
I-----f E~
d'S
I~J /-r"
L'tP
<;.
@)
~~.
i =-:L!:: ~
IJU'r~c.
- (POS. BENDING)
Strain Values
Moment, m/m cR
-~s-<~ -< ~s
(G"do"" 5)~c;~
"'do
&.q
~.,. 5)<E~
-~.. -< -&
-<
4- _~,.(~ _ ~ _
if...
~ ><tYs
E"",
:;-J >Ec-"
e;
5E;:",. "
~""i'
- J
a;;.
(;.~V
~
,. !E
5-)< ~s
...Fd4) >~,q.
C;>~
)rA;}{ii),~ ~
ce ... ~ _ a;- _
tff.,q
4;;
(-;;'1
-L-
(-z)
a;;,.
e>If.
(~?'::=J~~
. .(/--e;(P "&[(1
FC-..., . E~
,4
-L
~ ~-C;s
[.L{~-c9~~
EfT X~~
Sr", - c::e;.A'
",
-(r . . i~~+~~"~1il
4....
&,.,
~j(&)
cc-....
&-;.....
_2.(t>&_.Y)(4
~ ~)(!"~J
2
3
E_
tE:;....
A
/
~ >~I
C"_
,({e
- ~l5i1rr~
&'" e:- A
())
>c5-...
( E., ....
(~:;)
Z - (~ . . ~)(~s.)
( .
",
(~ .... 5).:: -s
(.4
ce)(:1
6-~
~~ffe. _ ~ _ ~(~)
Ce
edt
(~""7
(C; ....
~..,.
cfYs
(4~5)<4s
(4+
_/ ~- '2' (3-~
' j(.EfP
6 X~J
(foJ
C&A - c:s
~)(!~
A'" ~&
&-v- &~
,4
Z . . 2oc(!)(f;XM((/)) r:;;;J
-~~
~)(1t){!
- ~ - E.,.~~
~+&A
~'~A'A
,. ....
..
..
m-~P
Table l-b
Strain State
~~
~:
ce
1---1
t---I
c..
~&
ce
I---l
~r---t4
e~~
Ee
~d~~"
~s
@')
%
~~
m~
@t
/d
--.l
~8
Strain Values
Moment, m/mcR
-~ .. <c!'; <~..
4-~
- ~~+fo/t;s
-~.. <cs <4.
(E,o'- ~>c;~
ee.
E-r
<Zl.....
-L~/(-L
_cocj(CS
- ~c>4'
~ )(~.y_q:~
- ty4j]
.2 3
e;.~
A
~_
A
-6-- <~+~}<~
(:-~)
- 4,q
c;'!;;
/ [CL
';(3 - eX.
-(1: - q;~ ~(1) ~.s;-)
4W
&"1'
tt;;,.
Eo
ec &", - ~
Jt=r
(.~
A c:c....,;:~
~:~
1& "a: A
thr
~~ >(t:";r'" ~-)
E., -
.::c;....
-(F
+~ +
a;)(:&
~c~~a;,A
4 > 4..
:J<c:...
-~s c;, ...5k
- <... <(t:.. ..
t!; > ~s
( df,'"
5J> t!;,q
-e;.. 4"'5J<~
...
~>cy
e;,...
1---1
- e;,.. ~f!i~~~
.f;....
- (NEG. BENDING)
E. _
&~
(~
c:r..,.
~)(~y
E~
E... _ ~ ; ~ rr7"iJ""':
/J
2(E~
~A) (A ~ (ab,)
+ ce
F~
~...,
oc(c;
~.. - !err1;9~+V
4...
A
('I)
+.2
_~E.
- &j(1t)-~Ee - d;;... 4J~~
4-....
&,19 A
~.q ~A ez:;; 4)
-.!- [-!(L_~)r
U~
- ~E;
+ ~ + t?;;
~~
({;;J
2.3
~
~
A
tf;..,~..,.
A
_/_~
~ )(~
-"r;/- ~ -3f,t&
~}(:'!
(;7)
2 ('
3 - oc){;E.
E~ - ~"f:
A +2"
&::-R - ~
,41
.,.(/_oc)~Es
- ~)(:1- <>C~t!S
~'" c.:,q A
&:'"
~-L_~~6
&'" -
_I'
( ; ; ; ) .2 .:J
- C;
)(&jJ
t:1<r""'. A
E'J(5r)
/f-te- f}(R
-~,~
A r .2
Cor Cdr. A
t!:r
~ )~Es
6;,s)(41
d;; ...a;:,.
~(;J
c;.,q - Ec-A
A - , ~E;
&..., - t7;"..,.
A ]
t:C
/-tJ(;
:~& ~)r#~+~
A . (~ (i;-)~(-; -c4(~ - Z)(-:;vj.,. :-(/-q:- t}(tc:-~f~
-(~
~.... -~Y17-~+1e:+;r~
c~ A
~ t& 4; A
(/
~c.
&)(A~9
-A
- at:~Es
., ~
-a;)(,~J
&.....
a;.q .... 4,p
A
,
+ /-cc CCR
- E;.q
-....J
CO
..
"
Strain State
Strain Values
-.10
5-)<-$s
~>~ ..
-~ -<@;ry4ff}<:E;"l
(47'-5)< -~s
m-~-P
- (NEG. BENDING)
Moment, m/m"R
(i;;'j[~(j-co/C~: -:;}(;~-oc(::
-Z)67
."
..
Table 2
Given:
"
TRIAL SECTIONS
Fixed Ends
.f,
:=
pI = 9000 kips
= 11.5 psi
ys
r
yp
= 47.0 ksi
= 4.0 psi
Values
Tria
No.
Computed
Values Found in
Values
Design Curves
\...2:..a
yp
N'
--
.34
.60
12.5
85
11.25
143.7
.0852 .538
.48
.60
12.5
85
11.25
143.7
.34
.60
18
110
8.62
207.2
.0852 .67
.48
.35
10
60
14.06
115.0
,20
.60
14
60
11.88
161.0
--
--
A
p
A
f
54.05"
34.4 11. 7
7.0 4.68
4G.l .637
7.95 .589
.75
9.34
.550
47.9"
27.0 12.9
7.7 5.18
39.9 .563
7.0
.736
.75
6.90
--
62.5"
35.5 12.1
7.2 4.76
.465
.75
9.65
.373
40.1"
26.8 12.9
4.5 8.36
39.7 .669
6.7
.26
.625 7.20
.500
36.95"
22.8
4.5
2.7 1.82
27.3 .616
8.6
.211
.5
5.46
.45
.60
21.0
110
7.97
241.7
.775
49.75"
22.5 10.1
6.1 4.04
32.6 .453
9.5
.426
.625 9.76
.45
.60
17.5
60
10.62
201.3
.560
27.26"
12.4
3.4 2.23
18.0 .455
7.9
.281
.5
5.6
6.70
.25
.40
75
14.59
92.1
.0852 .44
64.0
.370
68.9"
63.1 13.3
5.3 7.96
76.4 .918
7.3
.867
.625 8.51
.30
.50
12
90
11.22
138.0
.0852 .55
45.0
.540
61.6"
42.1 12.6
6.3 6.33
54.7 .685
8.2
.772
.75
8.45
10
.35
.50
16
70
10.6
184.0
.550
38.35"
21.0
3.7 3.67
28.4 .548
8.8
.419
.50
7.35
7.4
CO
-81
248.18
Table 3
3.2%
1.6%
Average Error
Average Error if
largest value is omitted
3.6%
2.1% .
-82
248.18
.)
It
Longitudinal
Bulkhead
Transverse
Rib
Longitudinal
Stiffener
..,..==========:!::::!:::====-====-r
Fig. 1.1
Fig. 1.2
,.
Wave Forces
LOngitudina I
. Girder
248.18
-83
..
Fig. 2.1
..
~+PI
=mo =mI
I
Fig. 2.2
...
Loading Conditions
mlo
-84
~
Ap = bt
Symm.
Af = bf tf
Aw = dw
As = bftf + dw
A = bt + bf tf + dw
~d
-x
Fig. 2.3
,-~
Symm.
CTyp (Tension)
~
b
Fig. 2.4
248.18
-85
1_ _1
.>6.
O"edge O"avg.
i"oi"o
ax.
Fig. 2.5
--~
248.18
-86
=r;= \\I
Point
it
I
I
I
I
II
A II
I
I
I
I
I
I
,.
... ...
O"edge
O"edge
0:=0;
A
Fig. 2.6
YP O"'p max.
-87
248.18
Average Stress
(]"
..
,
r~
(]"p
rJimL
OJ
Koiter's
p max.
Eqn. Compression
Edge Strain, Ee
Tension
,.
Fig~
2.7a
Average Stress
(]"
Compression
--------------.f-------------t- E
S
Strain
Tension
Fig. 2.7b
-88
248.18
Flange
9d)__ ;f--+__....-
-----LPlate
O"p
O"ys
EEe
r,
Fig. 2.8
..
Flange
f~_ _ _
gd
Plate
O"p
O"ys
-EEe
Fig. 2.9
..
-89
248.18
READ
Input Values
.'.
t
ASSUME
Plate edge strain e/CR
INCREMENT or DECREMENT
Plate strain by ~e/CR
100 points for
.-,
Ineg. bending
then
pas. bending
~/CR<
CALCULATE
/CR & m/mCR for
specified
value
strain state
PRINT
ee/CR' /CR'
M/M CR
PROCEED
To numerical integration to
find the maximum length
Fig. 2.10
m-~-P
Calculations
-90
248.18
'"
o
:;:
o
P = Constant
a::
en
en
Q)
Q)
1:)
Q)
Ci5
Non - Dimensional Center Curvature
!o
""CR
Fig. 2.11
dz
flo.
Fig. 2.12
-91
248.18
8=0-
8=0
LJ...J.--.......~
8=v=0
P
Deflected
Shope
m
Diagram
4:
Fig. 2.13
248.18
.'
-92
........
CALL
m-):l relationship for constant P
ASSUME
midspan curvature t Calways pos.)
0
FIND
corresponding moment Mol
IsegmentSELECT
length fiS
ASSUME
terminal. curvature t Ci+l)a
COMPUTE
fiZ j , fiY j , Mi +l ,
CALL
Hi' Vi
New tCi+l)a
assumed as
old tCi+l)c
COMPUTE
terminal curvature t Ci+l)c
I
>0.00001
I
I
COMPUTE
/[tCi+l)a - tCi+l)c]/
<0.00001
COMPUTE
9i +l , Hi +l , Vi +l ,
SUM
t'lj' I::Z y I::S j
Increment midspan
curvature by M o
t
Let terminal values here become
initial values on the next segment
M> 0
COMPUTE
fiS for m=O, LP, x P, y P, & eP for S.S. case
S.S. values
previously
comDuted
CL i +l -, Li ) > 0 or
&S.ult. conds.
previously computed
9>0
I fiS
e<o
COMPUTE
for 9=0 , Lf , Xf , y f ,
I
I
Fig. 2.14
.&
.'.
..
".
b
-t-=85
2.40
- - _ . No Residual Stress
:~ =0.20
: ; =0.60
~=O.l5
CTyp
1.60
...... ......
(~pcr)max.
,,
1.20
0.80
0.40
-0.80
-0.60
-0.40
-0.20
+0.20
+0.40
+0.60
(~mcr )max.
Fig. 3.1
+0.80
',.
.'
0.60
0.30
1.45
.5:..
a"yp
= 0 15
bIt = 85
0.40
As/Ap= 0.20
AVAS = 0.60
a"ys = oyp = 47 ksi
1.80
0.20
I
I,
,-
I
I
-4.0
-3.0
-2.0
-1.0
2.0
I
J
3.0
4.0
1+CR
PIPeR =1.80 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I f J
1.60 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 r - f
-0.20
1.45 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A J
1.30 ------..,-..----------.-.==
1.00-----------------0.40
0.30----------------
-0.60
Fig. 3.2
Moment-Curvature-Thrust Curves
\.0
~
-95
248.18
1.60
JL=85
:;=0.20
1.20
~=0.60
O"ys
0=40
0.80 Q=320
Q= !80
- - No Residual Stresses
0.40
40
Fig. 3.3a
70
100
~
r
00,
1.60
1.20
P;
Per
0.80
Q= 320
0= 180
0.40
40
70
100
130
160
J....
r
Fig. 3.3b
248.18
-96
2.00
1.60
---- bit = 60
72
85
110
1.20
0.80
CT'ICTyp 0.00
AS/Ap 0.20
AliAS
=0.60
70
Fig. 3.4a
100
2.00
1.60
1.20
I}p'
CR
0.80
0.40
40
Fig. 3.4b
70
100
130
160
248.18
-97
.
bit = 60
72
85
110
O"~ayp = 0.00
AS/Ap = 0.20
Af/As
=0.60
0.80
0.60
p
PcR
Sf. )0.675
O"CR
0.40
0.20
160
,<
Fig. 3.5b
-98
248.18
1.60
..E..=
85
t
CTr =0.00
CTyp
1.20
~
.~
Af
Q=40
~p.cr
0.80
~Q=180
0.40
\\
I\
II
'AS =0.60
CTyp =CTys=47.0ksi
---:~=0.20
0.34 '
J1
40
0.48
100
70
-.J...
r
Fig. 3.6a Ultimate Strength Curves for
Various As/A p - Simply-Supported Ends
1.60
~~
~\ \~
~\ \~
1.20
Q= 320
0.80
~~~
~~VQ'40
,{Q=180
,\
\
I'
\\
.'
,"''''
'
\',I
"
100
Fig. 3.6b
\
\ \'
\'\\ ''\
0.40
130
',,,
160
-99
248.18
.....
1.60
""
'\
'\
b
-=85
\
~
1.20
:s =0.20
p
'7Per
~r =0.00
yp
CTyp =CTys=47.0 ksi
0.80
----~=0.35
---~=0.60
0.40
..
1.60
1.20
0.80
0.40
40
70
100
130
...L
r
Fig. 3.7b
..
.;.
I-'
co
1.00
0.80
Theoretical Prediction
6.5 psi
0.60
P
/p
cr
Theoretical Prediction
13.0 psi
TEST SPECIMENS
0.40
=S.5.,13.0psi
0.20
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
I
I-'
Fig. 3.8
a
a
...
.'
1.00
Theoretical .Prediction
6.5psi
0.80
Theoretical Prediction
13.0psi
0.60
FAP
cr
TEST SPECIMENS
0.40
0.20
10
20
30
40
-r
50
60
70
80
I
t-'
Fig. 3.9
I-'
1.60
Test Result
1.40
1.20
1.00.
PIPer
0.80
0.60
0.40
SPECIMEN DATA
11
Plate Thickness: 0.315
Stiff. Depth: 6.00 II
A re a of PI ate: 7. 56 in. 2
Area of Sti ff. : 3.36 in. 2
Area of Flange: 1.68 in. 2
bIt: 76.25 ksi
CTyp: 36.75 ksi
- - - - - Theoretical Prediction
With CTr: 3.0 psi
Theoretical Prediction
With No Residual Stress
CTys : 37. 4 k s i
Lateral Load=15.0 psi
0.20
10
20
30
40
Fig. 3.10
I-'
I\)
rv
.p-
1.20
co
I-'
5.5. ENDS
co
O"'r
-=0.00
O"'yp
1.00
N31~
0.80
:~ =0.60
Q.CD
It)
en
CD
If)
0
0
0
0.60
dII
Z
, Approximate
Curve
0.40
0.20
12
16
20
24
28
32
5=81.8,j' B.(
yP'w
I
I-'
Fig. 4.1
LN
-104
248.18
1.20
,--.
'",
Q.1Q.
++
1.00
AS/Ap = 0.20
C\I-
....~
N31~
-0. III
-----
=0.34
=0.48
---
0.80
"
:\
rt)
C\I
C\I
0.60
5.5. Ends
Q = 110
AtlAs =0.60
0.40
CTIfCTyp = 0.00
0
0
q
0
II
Fig. 4.2
\\
50
20
10
\\\
bit = 72
0.20
~\
60
70
80
1.20
"
1.00
,--.
~I~
0.80
N31~
-0. III
0.60
rt)
C\I
C\I
o
o
0.40
Oi'/CTyp = 0.00
II
5.5. Ends
Q= 110
AtlAs = 0.60
0.20
bit = 72
CTyp =CTyS =47.0 ksl
o
R=
10
20
30
40
50
60
-.
tv
~
1.00
.co
t-'
co
Fixed Ends
O"f/oyp =0.00
0.80
AS/Ap=0.34
Af/As =0.60
.10
co
:3
.0
0-
ksi
0.60
Computed { bIt < 80
Points
0 bIt ~ 80
j'.
ex>
C\J
q
0
0.40
Approximate
Curves
II
:z
0.20
Q=320
12
16
20
24
28
32
36
40
44
S=45.0V< 1 BL
P yw O. 65
I
Fig. 4.4
I-'
U1
248.18
- -106
0.80
0.60
...
c\
AS/Ap =0.20
-0.34
=0.48
~I~
~3-
.Q
c..CE1
Fixed Ends
Q =110
AtlAs =0.60
\Q
,...
(\J
0.40
Oi'/CTyp = 0.00
z"
bit - 72
ayp =CTys
=47.0 ksl
0.20
20
~r
40
Fig. 4.5
60
80
100
120
0.80
0.60
If
AS/Ap = 0.20
::c
_3
c..CE1
*
,...
=0.34
=0.48
0.40
(\J
oq
Fixed Ends
Q = 110
AtlAs =0.60
z"
0.20
CTr/CTyp
=0.00
bit =72
CTyp = CTys - 47.0 ksl
o
R=
20
40
60
80
100
120
Fig. 4.6
a.
....
l\.)
b/t~80 SI
+0>
bit ~ 80
t-'
co
Box II B"
Modification
For As/Ap
Box
t
I
R.
bit < 80
B II
Modification
For As/Ap
N~
II
I R2
S2 bit < 80
I
I
I
Box "C"
Modification
I For Af/A s
I
N.
N2
Fig. 4.7
t-'
-...J
-108
248.18
~.::> 87.
,
/5'L
5 .... 8/.8 -v"py~/I'~/
RR
A
- - A~ =0.20
/.0
As
---- A=0.34
.
p
As
- - - -,;:-=0.48
p
0.8
7.8
0=40
7.6"
0.6
7.4
:0.4
0=180
t:J ....//o
0.2
,+
/00
80
26
40
A~'p
..... 48-==:;:il~'Zl1."i7
/.R
..... RO
Ap .:7.35
4
...p
t:J
t:J
/.0
18
J'(d~)~b/t)
14
10
20
6
1.2
//0
06"
04
0.8
0.6
0.2
q = Lateral load (psi)
o =q (d/t) ,
Fig. 4.8
psi
~:
0=110
0=180
P'{b/t)
b = 0.000223 BN (I + As lAp)
80
0=40
0.4
6. Compute b:
60
=0.35
Af
- - As =0.60
40
7.6"0
40
5 = 81.8
22
0=320
-109
248.18
As
-=/)20
A
(/.
'P
A.
=034
,l
p
As
- - - - Ap =0.34
O"y~
j" =048
As
--- A
~Q=40
'P
=110
=:180
=)20
IV
0=40
0=/80
=0.20
~ __ O"R' = 0.150
__ :s
=0.48
Q =40
'04
0=320
26
bit < 80.
A
---- A. '/" =035
08
S:: 45.0
i 22
A'
18
BL
0.8
: : = 0.35
~:
I. Assume b/t,d/t,As/Ap,Af/As
AT
T=060
:s0=40
0=//0
2. Compute S, Q, CTR/O"yp
06
IV
04
0.6
Q=40
0.4
_pi (b/t')I.650
0.2
= Total panel
Q =q (d/t) , psi
Fig. 4.9
= Panel
width (in.)
Q =110
=0.60
length (in.)
248.18
-110
0.75"+
0.761"
0.65"
{=
I~...
Fig. 4.10
1l
----=.-39.0
10.4"
_J
14.75"
0.875
11
={=
--.-
- - r--0.599"
0.735"
14.69"
r- ~l======================6=2=.4=51=1=============~J
Fig. 4.11
248.18
-lll
8.
8.1
APPENDIX
Further infor-
Subscripting
(2)
consider~tion.
(4)
(5)
-112
248.18
(6)
computed, respectively.
8.1.2
Initial Values
M-~
, is chosen.
The corresponding
curve.
(8.1)
~o
is found.
(8.2)
= PiP yp
8.1.3
First Segment
..
(i+l)a =
(8.3)
-113
248.18
(8.4 )
Here the equation for M(i+l) is from Eq. 2.77 where the last two
terms have been dropped because of their negligible contributions.
The curvature
from the
M-~
~(~
curve.
1+
~(i+l)a.
is imposed:
~(i+l)c - ~(i+l)a
~(i+l)c
(8.5)
< 0.00001
~(i+l)c
is calculated.
When
~(i+l)c
-114
248.18
~( i+l)
.~
(i+l) c
1
8..1+ 1
= 80
+ '2 (~i+l +
Hi + l
= H0
+ QIR YP @Y j ;
Vi +l
= V0
+ QIR [6Z j
Y.1+1
= Y0
+ 6Y.
~.)(
ad
r
6S .) ad J
J
YP
+ (cos
. 801+ 1
"-
COS
8o~
~(sin8o 1 - sin8
0
YP
1+
(8.6)
Z.1+1 . = Z0 + 26Z.
J
L.i+i
= Lo
+' 268.
J
.1
8.1.4
Other Segments
segment.
After finding the terminal values for a segment, a check must
be made to see if the end conditions have been passed; that is, has
If this is
not the case, the values for the following segment can be calculated.
o segmen t W1'11 be assume d as th e J.th segment spann1ng
0
f rom p01nt
.
Th 1S
i to point i+l.
-115
248.18
As a first approxi-
<P(i+l)a
(8.7)
AS
U
t1y. = 68.
M.1+ 1
Ac
Llo.:l
.)2
r---r.
eyp Sln 9 i
~ II
.r.eyp
6J
Q'd
cos9.
1
(8.8)
= M.1
c,
<p( i+l) c
1
9.1+ 1
= 9.1
H.1+ 1
= H.1
= Y.1
t1Y. ,
[f).Z~
- ad
t1S. ..E... Ie
yp
J ad
+ (cos9.1+ 1 - COS9 i )]
~ ( sine. 1
yp
1+
z.1+ 1 = z.+
1 2t1Z.J ,
Sin9 )]
i
2t1S.
L.1+ 1 = L.+
1
J
(8.9)
248.18
-116
8.1.5
End Conditions
Pinned Ends
When moment changes sign, the distance along the segment
to the point of zero moment is found by assuming the variation in moment to be parabolic~ The non-dimensional
distance, dS P , from point i to this point is found by
solving Eq. 8.10.
P
I-M.)t.S.
10J (dS )
[ (M.1- l-M.)6S.+(M.
1
J
1+
1
J-
2
+ [ (M.1 -M.1- 1) 6S J. +(M.1+ I-M.1 )1'6S.
,j JdS P
~ J-~
(8.10)
J-
J -:.
P
dS
zP = z.
1 + 2 6S.
P
dS
yP = y.
1 + 6S.
J
r
1
~d le yp ' (6S.)
(8.11)
/.J.Z
J
6Y.
-117
248.18
B)
Fixed Ends
When the slope changes its sign, the non-dimensional
F
distance, d8 , to this point is found by solving the
parabolic equation.
F
(d8 )
r( 8.1- 1-8.)
68 .+( 8. 1-8.) 68. lJ
L
1
J
1+
1
J-
,f-J d8 F
2
+ R8.-e. 1)68. +(8 .. 1- 8 .)(68.
L 1 1- J
1+
1
J-L
+ 8. ( 68 .. 68. 1) ( 68. 1+ 68 .)
1
J J-.
JJ
(8.12 )
by Newton's Method.
(t
MF
i.
F
F
L = L1 + 2d8
F
F
6Z.
Z = Z.1 + 2 d8
68.
J
J
F
F
Y = y.1 + d8
68. 6Y.J
J
8.1.6
(8.13)
Ultimate Condition
248.18
-118
(8.14)
( 8.15)
If
(8.16)
one.
. P
=h
(8.17)
Lk_1-2Lk+Lk+l
(8.18)
Then by assuming
~~
zP
-119
248.18
(d~;)
zp =
(8.19)
Similarly xP and gP are computed from Eqs. 8.18 and 8.19 when
xP or gP is inserted instead of zp. The curvature at mid-span is
(8.20)
Equations
8.17 and 8.20 are' used to find the length, LF , and the mid-span
F XF , and MF are found with
curvature, ~ F ,respectively. Z,
o
,.
248.18
-120
9.
REFERENCES
1.
Kondo, J.
ULTIMATE STRENGTH OF LONGITUDINALLY STIFFENED PLATE
PANELS, SUBJECTED TO COMBINED AXIAL AND LATERAL
LOADING, Fritz Laboratory Report 248.13, Lehigh
University, August, 1965
2.
3.
Tsuiji, T.
STRENGTH OF LONGITUDINALLY STIFFENED PLATE PANELS
WITH LARGE bit, Fritz Laboratory Report 248.14,
Lehigh University, 1965
4.
5.
6.
Davidson, H. L.
POST-BUCKLING BEHAVIOR OF LONG RECTANGULAR PLATES,
Fritz Laboratory Report 248.15, Lehigh University,
June, 1965
7.
Bleich, F
BUCKLING STRENGTH OF METAL STRUCTURES, McGraw Hill,
New York, 1952
8.
9.
248.18
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
ou~
at Fritz Engineering
Dr. Lynn
S~
Beedle
development of the data for this report many thanks are extended
to Messrs. R. A.Strawbridge and D. Fahringer, and to
Mrs. Chenchang Ho Ko.
The authors are also indebted to Mr. John M. Gera, Jr. and
Miss SharonD. Gubichfor preparing the drawings and to Miss
Marilyn L. Courtright and Mrs. Carol A. Kostenbader who labored
hard in typing the manuscript.
UNCLASSIFIED
Se ClI rI ty CI assi f Icat on
'.
UNCLASSIFIED
2b. GROUP
3. REPORT TITLE
.lIT..TIMATE STRENGTH DESIGN OF LONGITUDINALLY STIFFENED PLATE PANELS WITH LARGE bit
1
~V ana1yt~fa1 ~r~eftigat~9n
n .<lfp nt:anp <::: tJi
. .<lrQ'p
'r
Joseph F. Vojta
Alexis O~tapenko
7a. TOTAL NO. OF PAGES
6. REPORT DATE
August, 1967
120
b . N0 OF REFS
Nobs-94092
b. PRO,JECT NO.
248.18
c.
gb. ,OTHER REPORT NOISI (Any other numbera that may be aasillned
thla report)
d.
10. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
o~tain
Department of Navy
Naval Ship Engineering Center
Washington, D. C.
13. ABSTRACT
I
I
I
,
,
i
UNCLASSIFIED
Security Classification
UNCLASSIFIED
Security Cla881fication
14.
KEY WORDS
,.
LIN K B
LINK"
ROLE
WT
ROLE
LINK C
WT
ROLE
W.T
--'
.>
UNCLASSIFIED
Security ClaBBification
r----,--------[----I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
__-_i
T-------,-----[~~_-_-
I
KEY WORDS
analysis, combined loads,
design curves, longitudinal
stiffeners, ship plates,
ultimate strength
I.
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
KEY WORDS
analysis, combined loads,
design curves, longitudinal
stiffeners, ship plates,
ultimate strength
1.
I
I
I
I
I
I
r---- ---------[~~~~~1------------1~~~~~~:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
L
KEY WORDS
analysis, combined loads,
design curves, longitudinal
stiffeners, ship plates,
ultimate strength
1.
-1-
KEY WORDS
analysis, combined loads.
design curves, longitudinal
stiffeners, ship plates,
ultimate strength
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - - - - - - - - -----_-1
DATE ISSUED
&
..